Tuesday-Wednesday blog
“A 53-year-old white British man”
First, I hope you noticed that, in the first news reports about a car ploughing into crowds celebrating some football thing in LIverpool, the BBC stressed 2 or 3 times that the man arrested was “a 53-year-old white British man“. Amazing how such information can be released so quickly when similar information about the identity of the Southport murderer was withheld for so long. And when information was eventually released, we were told the Southport murderer was “a Welsh choirboy”:

“The Great British Giveaway“
We Brits should be very proud – very proud of our extraordinary generosity. Our country is to all intents and purposes bankrupt. Our national debt is around 95.5% of GDP and rising. Our debt/GDP is lower than countries like Greece (158.2%), Italy (136.3%), France (113.8%), Belgium (105.6%) and Spain (104.3%). But is rather embarrassingly higher than Estonia (24.0%), Bulgaria (24.6%), and Luxembourg (26.6%). Moreover, every year we pay around £100bn on debt interest which is also rising. But, in spite of being increasingly bankrupt, we spray our borrowed money on anyone who isn’t British, while our government finds ever more new and exciting ways to extract our money to pay for our generosity.
Let’s look at just a few of our extravagances:
- The ludicrous Chagos giveaway – we are giving British territories away to Mauritius and also paying Mauritius around £30bn over the next 99 years to take territories to which Mauritius has no legal claim. The population of Mauritius is only around 1.261 million. So, if we’re giving that dump say £300 million a year that’s almost £300 to every Mauritian citzen. But, of course, most Mauritians will never see any of that money. According to the Transparency International Corruption Index, Mauritius is one of the world’s more corrupt countries on a similar level as such earthly paradises as Rwanda, Saudi Aabia, Georgia and Oman. So we can expect to see an awful lot of very very happy Mauritian politicians, bureaucrats and businesspeople over the next 99 years. What will Starmer do next? Give billions to Spain to take Gibraltar? Give billions more to Argentina to take the oil-rich Falklands? After all, we have so much money we can seemingly afford to keep funding the Great British Giveaway forever.
- The Channel illegal migrants – these people apparently pay thousands of pounds or dollars or euros or whatever to what the (IMHO) lying, UK-hating, globalist scumbag Keir Starmer calls ‘evil people smuggling gangs‘. Yet if these illegal migrants can afford the smugglers’ fees, why are we giving them free accommodation in 4-star hotels, free new clothes, free new smartphones, free spending money, free legal aid to fight deportation and much much more? Why? Apparently because we’re a very generous country and enjoy throwing our money away on anyone except British citizens. Our generosity is costing us at least £7 billion or £8 billion a year just in hotel costs. When you throw in all the other things we shower on these Third-World often uneducated, often unemployable, often criminal, often West-loathing invaders, the real amounts must be astronomical.
- The Foreign Aid fiasco – and then there’s foreign aid. We give over £10bn a year to the world’s most corrupt countries. And this massive giveaway seems to increase almost every year.

And the more we give, the richer the ruling elites in the recipient countries become while their citizens seem to become ever poorer.
- Money for nothing – Our generosity doesn’t just extend to foreigners. Once people live in Britain, we seem to prioritise anyone but Brits. According to our government’s own statistics, the overall unemployment rate in 2022 was 4%. Around 3% of white people were unemployed in 2022, compared with 6% of people from all other ethnic groups combined. People from the combined Bangladeshi and Pakistani (9%), Asian ‘other’ (7%) and black (7%) ethnic groups had the highest unemployment rates out of all ethnic groups while white people had the lowest unemployment rates out of all ethnic groups (3%). Out of all regions, Yorkshire and the Humber had the highest unemployment rates for people from the mixed (15%), ‘other’ (15%), and combined Pakistani and Bangladeshi (12%) ethnic groups. When explaining why some ethnic groups seem to live off British taxpayers more than others, our government explained: “The reasons for poor labour market outcomes for certain ethnic groups are complex”.
So, here’s a message to all the world’s most useless and corrupt countries – if you want money, just ask Starmer or, better still, come to Britain. We Brits are extremely generous with the money we pay in taxes in “The Great British Giveaway”.
An article in the telegraph from David Blair tries to make sense of this nonsense.
“Outdated Foreign Office dogma makes Britain weak. Chagos proves it”
“Our diplomats still believe the rules-based international order protects us. It just doesn’t”.
“the sacred dogma of British diplomats”
The “sacred dogma” pervades the entire administration irrespective of the government. To these people, the “international order” means the UK complying with everything, no matter what other countries might do.
It’s the same logic that has the UK “leading the way” on net-zero, even though our government’s determination to destroy the economy will have no effect whatsoever on the climate and no other government is going to follow in our footsteps.
Ivory tower dwelling at its finest completely adrift from the modern world. Oxbridge PPE and classicists graduates living in pampered luxury at tax payers expense but one good thing the Chagos island episode has done is shine a light on this important area that has been largely unnoticed.
No doubt the quick release of information about the driver will be claimed as learning from past mistakes. What is impossible to understand is why the government doesn’t see a problem with their policies.
Jordan Peterson recently described those promoting net zero as insane and compared it to a religious movement. I have been an atheist all my life but I don’t believe he is right. There’s a calmness about most religions and in comparison there is anger about the net zero brigade when challenged. I have yet to see a TV debate involving a scientist who understands that we are not causing climate change. The only person was Mark Steyn who challenged the hockey stick and he soon vanished from our screens. Why is there no challenge to Al Gore’s inconvenient truth over his claim of correlation between carbon dioxide and temperature with carbon dioxide claimed to be causing temperatures to change when the mathematical analysis shows the opposite? This should be obvious to every maths teacher and yet not a single school is pointing this out. It also doesn’t say much for all the adults who have gone through the government propaganda machine.
I have tried to convince an ex-politician about the scientific case about climate change and his response was “ Winning this debate (he means net zero) is not dependent on the relatively esoteric scientific one.” Keeping the masses ignorant seems to be the priority.
I have just started reading Mike Lofgren’s book about the Deep State in reference to Washington. This is what Paul is talking about. The politicians are no longer in control and are just puppets controlled by our real masters and most of the media are now part of the Deep State. Matt Goodwin has a series of articles at the moment about the “elites”.
I really miss Maggie Thatcher. We desperately need her now.