Thursday-Friday blog
I have written before discussing whether an English civil war was inevitable. In this blog, I thought it might be worth considering what conditions might lead to a civil war. I ain’t no historian or philosopher or climatologist other supposed ‘expert’ generously paid to push a certain politically-correct agenda. But, perhaps with just a little non-expert common sense, one can begin to identify some situations which might make a civil war more likely.
Situation 1: Second-class citizens – a significant part of the population, usually a minority but in some cases it could even be a majority, feels they don’t have the same rights and opportunities as some other section of the population. That was clearly the case during 1968-1998 Troubles in Northern Ireland where the minority Catholic community felt it was oppressed by the Protestant majority. This was also partly responsible for the Ukraine mess where the Russian-speaking areas were engaged in a low-level civil war with the Ukrainian areas and this gave Russia an excuse to invade.
Situation 2: Radicalisation – here most people in a group might want to integrate with other sections of society and live in peace. But radical elements within one group increasingly agitate to gain power and influence with the aim of imposing their beliefs and way of life on all other groups. And the more success the radicalised agitators have, the more they are able to create hostility and division between their group and the rest of society thus deliberately increasing radicalisation. This was probably the cause of the collapse into violence of Lebanon, the ongoing low-level civil war in Southern Thailand and may be responsible for some of today’s bloodletting in several African countries
Situation 3: Economic decline and corruption – when an economy declines, some groups might start competing for the decreasing resources available. This situation is exacerbated when a corrupt ruling class is seen to be extracting much of the available wealth for itself. This competition for resources can quickly lead to fragmentation of society and violence. This has probably been the cause of several South American civil wars. Maybe our friends in Zimbabwe can be a leading example of this and we can soon expect the Zimbabwification of utterly corrupt failing South Africa
Situation 4: Distrust/contempt for the ruling elites – when people feel that the ruling elites are no longer acting in the interests of the general population, this can lead to mistrust of and contempt for political and societal leaders. Social cohesion will soon break down and there will be a sense of it being ‘every community having to look after itself and to h*ll with all others‘.
Situation 5: Invasion – if a population feel that their country is being over-run by people from outside and their heritage, history, customs and culture are being desecrated and destroyed, they may eventually turn to violence to try to protect the things they consider of value.
All the above are, of course, just part of some theoretical musings early on a Thursday morning. I’ll leave it up to readers to decide whether any, some of or all of the above might apply to today’s Britain.
There is a common theme in this analysis which is the idea of group identity. Ayn Rand recognised this problem. She believed in individualism, rights being individual and a society based on cooperation between individuals. We are moving further and further away from her philosophy. She believed in industrialisation but she did not witness the impact of the internet. Individualism seems to be an impossibility now and a meaningful definition of civilisation has been lost.
For decades, governments have tried to make policy changes permanent by signing international agreements. This has undermined the central pillar of the British constitution, namely that no government may bind its successors. It also exposes politicians who blame civil servants for pointing out you cannot violate the treaty you all signed up to and the consequences can be seen on the streets of Ballymena.
Sad that the fit young men the establishment love to import here are not as gay as them. A bit stabby and rapey is not ideal for social cohesion and plonk a load in hotspots like Belfast or Liverpool seems designed to provoke trouble which of course it is. They want trouble as it helps them justify their two tier system of justice but will the army and police who are left to enforce this shit show really want to put their lives on the line to enrich and protect the mad commie ideologies of north London human rights lawyers. Similar to Ukraine who would put their life on the line to fight for globalist parasites who want to put you in jail and steal your future.
Both of you are correct, I feel we getting very close to the tipping point of anarchy which normally follows apathy.
Our leaders and the establishment really don’t care carrying on with the agenda dictated to them by their masters. They have had 14 years to plan this invasion Bury thier heads in the sand.
Devide and conquer the population.
RFK said “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable”
John Fitzgerald Kennedy