September 2017
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  

I’m off to talk to Plod

You’ve probably seen the story. Following a US air attack in April on ISIS militants, a university student – a white male – wrote on his blog or FaceBook or whatever: ‘I’m glad we could bring these barbarians a step closer to collecting their 72 virgins’. The student had previously written other comments on social media expressing negative views about our friends from Eezlumic State, for example:

Mr Travers has previously caused controversy over inflammatory comments made on gender issues

Following this expression of negative opinions about ISIS and radical terrorist Eezlum, a second-year history student – a woman of colour – claimed that such comments ‘put minority students at risk and in a state of panic’ and breached the student code of conduct. Now the student who criticised ISIS is being investigated by the university for Eezlumophobia.

The woman of colour who made the complaint identifies herself online as ‘a self-proclaimed feminist and womanist from inner-city London’. I’m not quite sure what a “womanist” is, but I expect it’s something rather noisy and deeply unpleasant.

The lady in question added: ‘I value inclusivity as well as building and preserving safe spaces for us. Creating a truly intersectional campaign is incredibly important to me and my first job will be to work alongside the other liberation groups to ensure EUSA (Edinburgh University Students’ Association) are fully representative of our views. Here at Edinburgh I want BME Students to engage in conversations about the issues that affect us.’ Sounds like total bollox to me. But hey, what do I know?

Admittedly the gentleman criticising radical Eezlumic terror is only being investigated by the university authorities, not the police. At least, not yet. But the story shows how limited free speech has become in progressive, diverse multi-cultural Britain and, in fact, throughout Europe:

 I know I’m finding it increasingly difficult to write anything without the risk of some politically-correct, virtue-signalling, lefty libtard idiot reporting me to the police.

So, I’ve decided to go and talk to Plod to get some written guidelines from Plod about what can be written and what constitutes a supposed “hate crime”. This is especially important ever since the (IMHO) utterly useless, politically-biased, Eezlumophiliac, Eezlumofascist Director of Public Prosecutions decided a few weeks ago that writing anything remotely critical about any person or group constituted a “hate crime” on the same level as attacking them in the street and hospitalising them.

For example, if I wrote something that is statistically-correct like “nowadays you’re more likely to be killed by Eezlumic terror than by right-wing terror or Hindu terror or Buddhist terror”, is that a justifiable statement of fact? Or is it a “hate crime” slandering all Moozerlums everywhere in a totally unforgivable way? Or if I wrote “if you want a toasted bacon sandwich, it’s probably best not to go to a Halal restaurant”. What is that? Is it a statement of the obvious? Or is it a supposed “hate crime”? And what if I wrote “Halal/Kosher slaughter is inhumane and should be banned?” Is this a valid opinion? Or a supposed “hate crime”?

I imagine it will take me a couple of weeks to get some kind of sensible answer from Plod if it is even possible. So I will stop writing my blog now and plan to re-start on Thursday 28 September.

There are apparently people who believe Plod spends much of his/her time trawling the Internet reading blogs like mine looking for supposed “hate crimes”. If this is true, my break will give Plod some time to go and catch some real criminals – burglars, rapists (except those from a certain group who are allowed to do what they want), muggers, car thieves, illegal immigrants, fraudsters etc etc.

Now I understand what they mean by having 4 wives

(weekend blog) Here at snouts-in-the-trough our aim is to enlighten and educate our readers to the many wonders of the world we live in. In particular we feel it’s important to increase cross-cultural understanding to break down barriers and ensure we all live happily ever after in the diverse, multi-cultural paradise our rulers are creating for us by encouraging a massive, Third-World invasion into our formerly advanced, civilised, democratic, tolerant countries.

As part of this mission to educate and inform, I attach below a very short video (less than half a minute). If it is genuine (and it looks genuine) this seems to show a gentleman from the world’s most advanced culture with his four wives. In the video, the gentleman appears to be pleasuring one of his four wives while the other three wait patiently for him to take them to sexual Nirvana too when it’s their turn.

With any luck, this gentleman and many like him will soon be heading to Europe and Benefits Britain to give our females the benefits of their well-practised amorous skills.

That’s something to look forward to.

Coming soon to a street near you:

(to watch the video, click on the headline below and then on the arrow in the middle of the picture)

Having four demanding “wives” sure does keep a Muslim on his toes

Pat Condell has invaded my “safe space”! Again! Boo-hoo-hoo-hoo!

(There were some interesting comments on my blog about Woofie yesterday. To read them just click on the title of yesterday’s blog)

He’s back. Yes, after months of silence Pat Condell is back. And he’s saying horrible things. As usual. He’s saying things that upset me. As usual.

I want diversity! I want multi-cultural enrichment! I want the (IMHO) deranged Nazi Angela ‘Mad Cow’ Merkel to destroy horrible Western European culture and civilisation. I want the whole of Europe to follow Sweden’s example by becoming a violent, excrement-covered, backward, primitive, crime-ridden, lawless Third World hell-hole. I want this! I want this!!! I want this!!!!!

Why does Pat Condell keep criticising what is happening to our continent? Why does he keep invading my safe space? I want to cry! Boo-hoo-hoo-hoo!

Watch out dog-owners! Woofie could be the next thing banned in multi-cultural Britain!

As Britain becomes a much more inclusive, much more diverse, much more Third-World country, we need to change many of our long-held traditions and customs to make the ‘new Britons’ more welcome in our once great country.

There are many disgusting customs we have which upset the hordes pouring over our uncontrolled borders – free speech, tolerance, democracy, low levels of corruption, equality between men and women, permitting homosexuality, making rape a crime rather than a harmless hobby for men, not cutting off clitorises, working rather than living off benefits, eating pork, humanely stunning animals before slaughtering them, allowing females outside the home without making them look like Darth Vader on a bad hair day etc etc

But one thing that really pisses off many of those who have come to enrich our country is the British habit of keeping dogs as pets:

I can’t understand how dog owners can be so selfish. Don’t they understand that they are offending many of the people invading and taking over our country?

Here’s a leaflet pushed through the doors of many people in an area being taken over by multi-cultural enrichers explaining the problem:

So, dog owners, it’s time to show more respect for your new neighbours. It’s time for you to adapt to the new Britain:

It’s time for you to tell Woofie and Buster and Yappie and Chomper and Tara that their days may be numbered. It’s time for you to make your guests more welcome by getting rid of your canine friends.

And, Woofie, you’re not going to escape the coming purge on dogs by pretending to be a multi-cultural enricher:

That won’t work!

You’re not fooling anyone with that disguise!

You’d have to be pretty stupid to claim ***** is more violent than any other religion

I’m getting fed up of people claiming that there is one religion that is slightly more violent than all other religions.

After all, look at how few people have been killed and maimed by our favourite religion over just the last 7 days.

Only around 15 people a day are getting killed and around 10 a day are getting injured in religiously-inspired attacks by people from the religion that some idiots accuse of being more violent than other religions.

Meanwhile nobody has been killed or injured in religiously-inspired attacks by other religions.

So let’s stop all this nonsense about a certain religion being a tad inclined to violence. If you disregard all the attacks listed below, then all religions are pretty much the same:

Date Country City Killed Injured Description
2017.09.05 Nigeria Bulamari 4 0 Boko Haram murder four farmers in a drive-by shooting.
2017.09.05 Mali Kidal 2 2 Two peacekeepers bleed out following a landmine attack by suspected Islamists.
2017.09.04 Pakistan Karachi 1 1 Ansar ul Sharia members open fire on police, killing one.
2017.09.04 Somalia Elasha Biyaha 2 4 A remote-controlled bomb takes down two passersby.
2017.09.04 Myanmar Maungtaw 1 0 Another Hindu villager is reported killed by Muslim terrorists.
2017.09.04 Iraq Ramadi 7 0 Terrorists break into a home and shoot all seven members of a family to death.
2017.09.03 Kenya Ukunda 2 2 Suspected al-Shabaab members open fire on a church during service, killing two guards.
2017.09.03 Somalia Kismayo 11 10 At least eleven others are killed when a suicide bomber strikes a local security base.
2017.09.03 Iraq Anbar 16 0 Sixteen civilians are executed in cold blood by caliphate members.
2017.09.02 Pakistan Karachi 2 0 A child is among two people killed by Ansar ul Sharia gunmen.
2017.09.02 Iraq Samarra 7 12 Suicide bombers take out seven employees at a power plant.
2017.09.01 Pakistan Shati Meena 3 2 A father and son are among three people dismantled by Islamic bombers.
2017.09.01 Somalia Af-Urur 13 10 A group fighting for an Islamic State plants a bomb that claims thirteen lives.
2017.09.01 India Panta Chowk 1 7 One person is killed when Lashkar-e-Toiba members attack a bus.
2017.08.31 Sweden Stockholm 0 1 A police officer is stabbed in the neck by a Muslim migrant.
2017.08.31 Iraq Tal Afar 3 7 A female suicide bomber murders three Iraqis.
2017.08.31 Burkina Faso Djibasso 1 0 Religious radicals shoot a border guard to death.
2017.08.31 Algeria Tiaret 2 0 A suicide bomber detonates at a police station, killing two, including an officer who sacrificed himself.
2017.08.31 Kenya Tanu 2 3 Two people are killed when al-Shabaab members plant landmines in the road and then machine-gun survivors.
2017.08.31 Libya Nofaliya 2 2 An Islamic State suicide bomber detonates at a checkpoint, killing two guards.
2017.08.31 Nigeria Tudun Wada 2 4 Extremists murder a Christian father and son, then kidnap three women and a baby.
2017.08.30 Afghanistan Phusht Koh 3 0 Three police are vaporized by a Taliban roadside bomb.
2017.08.30 Kenya Nyongoro 1 0 A truck driver is shot to death by Islamists.
2017.08.30 Nigeria Banki 18 0 Islamists butcher eighteen young people with knives.
2017.08.30 Afghanistan Jalalabad 2 0 At least two people are killed during a suicide attack on a lawmaker’s house.

Instructional videos for all the family – from Al-YouTube

As our rulers push on with their policy of race replacement to move Britain ever further towards the wondrous multi-cultural society the lefties and libtards and BBC and C4 News etc want to impose on us, the world’s favourite website, Al-YouTube, has some great instructional videos to help you and your family adapt to life in the new Britain.

Here are just a few of the most popular educational videos that all your family will certainly find very useful and enjoy:

..HOW TO BLOW YOURSELF UP
..PAEDOPHILIA FOR FUN AND PROFIT
..HOW TO DRIVE A CAR/LORRY INTO A CROWD
..HOW TO ASSASSINATE CARTOONISTS
..HOW TO WRITE A FATWA AGAINST AUTHORS
..SCENIC TOURS OF ROTHERHAM AND ROCHDALE
..PRONUNCIATION OF ALAHU AKBAR
..BEHEADING FOR FUN AND PROFIT
..HOW TO MAKE VIDEOS OF BEHEADINGS
..HOW TO STAB RUSSIANS
..HOSTAGE TAKING FOR FUN AND PROFIT
..CHILD MOLESTING FOR FUN AND WHATEVER
..HOW TO BLOW UP ANCIENT STATUES
..HOW TO RUN OVER SPANIARDS
..WIFE BEATING 101
..WHAT’S UNDER THE BURKA
..CRUCIFIXION FOR BEGINNERS (and CHRISTIANS)
..SLAVE TRADING 101, 102,
..ADVANCED SLAVE TRADING
..HOW TO SEEK ASYLUM IN SWEDISTAN
..BURKA FASHION SHOWS
..HOW TO GANG RAPE IN SWEDEN
..HOW TO GANG RAPE IN FRANCE
..MAKING GANG RAPE IN ITALY ENJOYABLE FOR WOMEN
..HOW TO LIVE IN THE SEVENTH CENTURY
..SUCCESSFUL ACID ATTACKS ON WOMEN WHO REFUSE TO HAVE SEX WITH YOU
..HOW TO CO-OPT COWARDLY BRITISH POLITICIANS
..HOW TO SHOOT UP A MILITARY BASE
..HOW TO CREATE NO-GO ZONES
..HOW TO GET SHARIA LAW
..HOW TO FLY A PLANE INTO A BUILDING
..HACKING UP CHRISTIANS FOR NOT CONVERTING TO ISLAM
..GOAT SEX vs SHEEP SEX – ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW
..HOW TO TAKE OVER LEBANON AND KILL CHRISTIANS
..HOW TO TAKE OVER ITALY AND THE VATICAN

It seems that Al-YouTube have deleted HOW TO USE A TOILET as nobody ever viewed it. But Al-YouTube has kept some old favourites which never seem to go out of date:

..FGM – DO IT AT HOME AND AMAZE YOUR FRIENDS

..CALAIS TO DOVER – A TRAVEL GUIDE

I highly recommend that readers go to the Al-YouTube website.

It’s got everything you ever needed to know to survive and thrive in the new not-so-great Britain.

Myanmar – Who are the victims? Who are the oppressors?

If I were to ask you which of the world’s religions was the most peaceful, I think your first choice (if you’re being serious) would be “Buddhism”. Yet the whole British mainstream news media is currently peddling a narrative about how “evil” Buddhists are massacring innocent Rohinga Moozerlums in Myanmar.

It’s all very odd.

But could there be a reason that Myanmar’s normally peaceful Buddhists are more than a tad pissed off with their Rohinga neighbours? Not according to the BBC and C4 News and the main papers. For them it’s clear that the Buddhists are the oppressors and the Rohinga the innocent victims

But then the British media tend to conveniently overlook the possibly thousands of Buddhist girls who have been raped, tortured and sometimes killed by Rohinga:

Does that sound familiar? Think Rotherham, Oxford, Rochdale and almost every other British town with a large “Asian” population.

And the British media don’t seem to worried about the many Buddhist monks brutally murdered by Rohinga gangs:

Nope, the British media once again treat the Rohinga Moozerlums as innocent victims.

But let’s go on a brief world tour: in the Philippines there is an ongoing bloody conflict between Moozerlums and Christians; in Thailand and Myanmar there is ongoing bloody conflict between Buddhists and Moozerlums; in India/Pakistan there is constant violence between Hindus and Moozerlums and Sikhs and Moozerlums; in Moozerlum Pakistan and Bangladesh abuse, oppression, rape and murder of Christians is widespread; in the Middle East Moozerlums want to exterminate all the Jews; in Egypt there is horrific oppression abuse, rape and murder of Coptic Christians; across Africa Christians are being hacked and burnt to death every single day by their Moozerlum friends:

in Europe there’s around one attack a week by Moozerlums on Western Europeans; in Moozerlum countries Christians often meet an unfortunate end:

and there is even daily slaughter of Moozerlums by other Mozerlums.

Of course, unlike Jon Snow and Kathy Newman and Krishnan Whatever, I’m no expert in Myanmar’s ethnic conflict. But it does seem that the Myanmar Buddhists have asked themselves the question – can we ever live in peace with our country’s Moozerlum immigrants?

I’ll leave it up to you to decide what the answer to that question might be.

The Drunk and the Skunk – why we should worry

Last week was quite a good one for the British Brexit negotiators. Apparently a junior UK official made a Powerpoint presentation to the two negotiating teams in which he showed that the EU’s demand for up to £90bn in divorce payments from Britain was a total pile of crap with no financial or legal justification.

It seems that the pompous garbage from Brussels were shocked. After all, with a resurgent (Nazi?) Germany pulling their strings, normally nobody dares challenge them because most European countries – Holland, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, France, Italy etc etc – have repeatedly shown throughout recent history to be snivelling cowards who do what their German rulers tell them. But history also shows that Britain is probably the only country that ever dares face down the Nazis (sorry, I meant Germans) and prevent them dominating and destroying Europe.

But while the British negotiating team was giving the finger to the Nazi EU bureaucrats, there was something else going on in Brussels. Here it is, probably the most repulsive photo of the week:

No, it’s not two rampant Mandelsonians at a European LGBT convention. In fact it’s our very own former PM, the (IMHO) war criminal, lying, self-serving, prostitute to dictators Anthony Blair meeting one of his best mates – the reportedly frequently inebriated EU Commission boss Juncker the Drunker.

So, what was the (IMHO) lying Skunk Blair doing with the Brussels Drunk? Perhaps the Skunk was there to assure the Drunk that, if the EU refused to do a deal with Britain, Blair would ensure that he would work to keep Britain under Nazi German control in the EU? After all, Labour have just done a reverse-ferret suddenly moving from promising Britain would leave the Single Market (with its freedom of movement and thus no control over our borders) to staying in the Single Market under complete Nazi Germany control.

Why would the Skunk do this? Partly, I assume it’s because he hates Britain and all Britain stands for – democracy, rule of law, fairness, free speech – and like all progressive internationalists wants to wipe out the concept of countries and bring us all under the control of a narrow clique of unelected hereditary bureaucrats.

But maybe there’s something else in it for the (IMHO) treacherous Skunk Blair? Maybe the Skunk is trying to do a deal whereby, if he keeps Britain in the EU, his reward will be becoming the next EU Commission President? After all, no man has more love for himself than he would lay down his country for his own personal ambition. And no man has more love for himself than Anthony Lynton Blair. Then the fragrant, charitable, much-loved, popular Cherie could be “Europe’s First Lady”.

Blair’s business career as an adviser to dictators seems to have crashed. Blair now needs another way to further increase his wealth and keep himself preening on the world stage. So, I would worry about the recent Drunk and Skunk Brussels love-in. I would worry that the Skunk is preparing to sell out his country in order to further ingratiate himself to his globalist paymasters and further enrich himself.

Beware the Drunk and the Skunk – they loathe us and would do anything to increase their power over us.

Oh, and here’s one of the cultural-enrichers in Italy doing the only job he knows how to do in order to supplement his benefits money with an ‘honest, hard day’s work’:

How to be a progressive feminist

I am a progressive feminist. This man has hurt my feelings. This man has offended me. This man should be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned for speaking the truth and offending people like me:

Free speech is dead! The truth is a crime! The libtards have won!

A couple of days ago, I listed the three steps towards totalitarian thought control in Britain

1. Invention of the “hate crime”

The first step towards the imposition of Britain’s totalitarian-state repression of free speech was the invention of the totally spurious concept of the “hate crime”.

A “hate crime” is defined as an offense motivated by hostility, or that shows hostility, toward the victim’s disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity.

The key issue here is how our rulers have linked the words “hate” and “hostility”. Somehow they’re claiming that anything motivated by “hostility” is automatically a “hate crime” even though there is a massive difference between “hostility” and “hate”.

If I dared criticise some person or group, it would be difficult to prove I “hated” them but easy to show I was “hostile” to them. Thus any criticism automatically becomes a “hate crime”.

2. Anyone can claim someone is offended

We all know that there are many thousands of idiots who spend hours on-line every day looking for something they can claim offends them. Then they can express “outrage” on “social media” and maybe even start a “twitterstorm” or suchlike. But the wonderful (from our rulers’ point of view) thing about the supposed offence of “hate crime” is that a person doesn’t have to be personally offended by the “hate crime”.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) already defines hate crime as ‘any offence which is perceived by the victim, or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice’.

So, if you consider yourself offended by anything I write, or even if you are not offended but you feel someone else somewhere might have been offended, then the police would have to investigate whether I had committed a “hate crime”.

3. Words are now judged as dangerous as physical attacks

Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), the most senior public prosecutor in England and Wales, has decided in her wisdom that on-line “hate crime” against any person or group is the equivalent of a physical assault. Like her predecessor, Keir Starmer (now, surprise surprise a Labour MP), Saunders appears to be a progressive, Blairite lefty who finds (IMHO) free speech abhorrent and wants it crushed.

So Saunders has extended the concept of “hate crime” without needing to get any approval from the Government or Parliament. According to Ms Saunders, police should investigate any “hate crime” and judges should sentence anyone found guilty as if they had committed a physical assault.

Conclusion – it’s over

These three legal moves put together now mean that Britain probably has more oppressive censorship laws than most totalitarian countries. How we have allowed this to happen in a country that throughout history has been a champion of democracy and free speech is incredible. Venezuela’s laughable tin-pot dictator Maduro must be looking on in envy at how Britain’s rulers managed to extinguish freedom of speech without any protests or violence.

In this new environment, it’s clearly impossible to write a blog like mine without risking investigation and possible prosecution should anyone anywhere feel that my blog was possibly hostile to someone somewhere even if that supposedly “offended person” was completely unaware of anything I had ever written.

I have already been warned once by my local Plod about writing supposed “hate crimes”. Yet Plod apparently doesn’t have any time or resources to investigate rapes, murders, burglaries, motor theft, acid attacks, knife crime, illegal immigration, slavery, local government corruption etc etc.

Had my readers been a little more supportive of my blog, I would have risked continuing. But when 98.7% of my readers were so tight-fisted that they refused to buy a copy of my most recent book (I just asked you to buy it, not to read it), it would be stupid for me to take a personal risk for people who couldn’t give a damn.

I might review the situation in six months (March 2018) after I’ve seen what happens to other bloggers. In the meantime, as they say in the cartoons, “that’s all folks”.

In the meantime, I would recommend www.breitbart.com/london/ or www.thereligionofpeace.com or www.barenakedislam.com

But a British government forcing even blogs like my totally insignificant efforts to close down should serve as a mark of shame for our country and a terrible betrayal of all those who made sacrifices to preserve our freedom and democracy.

The libtards have won!

We cowardly Brits should all hang our heads in shame for allowing this to happen!