Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here:
Cookie Policy
I have started work on making five or six 2-3-minute hopefully slightly amusing political parody videos for YouTube. After all, in these grim times we all need something to smile about.
I attach below a link to the first of these.
I want to ask your help. I would like you to send the link to these videos to as many people, politicians, media and other organisations as you can and also ask them to send the links on to other people, politicians, media and organisations as the more people who view these videos, the better.
The videos are a bit rough and ready and not quite Hollywood quality. But I have a restricted budget and have done the videos as well as I can for my budget.
I hope you will help me. Here’s the first of these videos:
I have written before discussing whether an English civil war was inevitable. In this blog, I thought it might be worth considering what conditions might lead to a civil war. I ain’t no historian or philosopher or climatologist other supposed ‘expert’ generously paid to push a certain politically-correct agenda. But, perhaps with just a little non-expert common sense, one can begin to identify some situations which might make a civil war more likely.
Situation 1: Second-class citizens – a significant part of the population, usually a minority but in some cases it could even be a majority, feels they don’t have the same rights and opportunities as some other section of the population. That was clearly the case during 1968-1998 Troubles in Northern Ireland where the minority Catholic community felt it was oppressed by the Protestant majority. This was also partly responsible for the Ukraine mess where the Russian-speaking areas were engaged in a low-level civil war with the Ukrainian areas and this gave Russia an excuse to invade.
Situation 2: Radicalisation – here most people in a group might want to integrate with other sections of society and live in peace. But radical elements within one group increasingly agitate to gain power and influence with the aim of imposing their beliefs and way of life on all other groups. And the more success the radicalised agitators have, the more they are able to create hostility and division between their group and the rest of society thus deliberately increasing radicalisation. This was probably the cause of the collapse into violence of Lebanon, the ongoing low-level civil war in Southern Thailand and may be responsible for some of today’s bloodletting in several African countries
Situation 3: Economic decline and corruption – when an economy declines, some groups might start competing for the decreasing resources available. This situation is exacerbated when a corrupt ruling class is seen to be extracting much of the available wealth for itself. This competition for resources can quickly lead to fragmentation of society and violence. This has probably been the cause of several South American civil wars. Maybe our friends in Zimbabwe can be a leading example of this and we can soon expect the Zimbabwification of utterly corrupt failing South Africa
Situation 4: Distrust/contempt for the ruling elites – when people feel that the ruling elites are no longer acting in the interests of the general population, this can lead to mistrust of and contempt for political and societal leaders. Social cohesion will soon break down and there will be a sense of it being ‘every community having to look after itself and to h*ll with all others‘.
Situation 5: Invasion – if a population feel that their country is being over-run by people from outside and their heritage, history, customs and culture are being desecrated and destroyed, they may eventually turn to violence to try to protect the things they consider of value.
All the above are, of course, just part of some theoretical musings early on a Thursday morning. I’ll leave it up to readers to decide whether any, some of or all of the above might apply to today’s Britain.
I was going to write a blog today about the recent unrest in Northern Ireland. But then I remembered that whenever there is a ‘race’ riot against the allegedly criminal activities of multi-cultural enrichers, the truth is covered up by the authorities and the enrichers are protected while those expressing discontent with our country’s surrender to the Third-World invasion get vilified by those in power and banged up for years by our two-tier, utterly corrupt, ludicrously-misnamed ‘justice system’.
So, following Shakespeare’s advice that ‘discretion is the better part of valour’, I funked out. That’s how hidden censorship works.
Instead, here’s a (hopefully amusing) shortish video from Talk TV. It features Kevin O’Sullivan and Isabel Oakeshott discussing the latest comic performance from broken Britain’s utterly useless and incompetent Border Farce.
Apologies about the failure to continue this blog over the last few days. I employed a freelancer to sort out an issue with my laptop. Rather than actually doing the work, he sent me an email telling me what I needed to do. I explained to the gentleman that, if I were to employ say an electrician to rewire my home, I would expect that electrician to do the work and not just send me an email telling me how to do it myself. So he sent me another email basically implying I was an idiot if I couldn’t follow his instructions. So I did try what he suggested and lost all my links to websites I had subscribed to, all my usernames and passwords and probably lost lots more besides. It has taken me a few days and many hours to sort this mess out. Oh, and when I refused to pay the person for his ‘work’, he blamed me for not following his advice correctly.
I do seem to be having some problems with the people I hire to do work which they claim to be qualified to do. I’ve been trying to produce some parody videos for the last 2 months and have posted the project details on a couple of websites where freelancers can bid for work. Unfortunately I have been forced to cancel the work that 10 different freelancers were doing as I found out they had been using AI to write their proposals and that they actually didn’t have a clue how to do the videos. They tried all sorts of tricks to get the work and bully me into paying for garbage. One even claimed to be English and live in the UK. But I found out he was actually Pakistani and lived in Pakistan.
And then there was the car electrician. My car battery had been draining and going flat every few days. This great electrician supposedly investigated the problem and came to the conclusion that my car’s ‘electronic control unit’ (ECU) needed to be replaced. But as my car was 17 years old, replacement parts were no longer available so he suggested I might as well scrap the car and buy a new one. My car has only done about 39,000 miles so I was reluctant to get rid of it. So, instead of following the great auto electrician’s advice, I thought about the problem for all of maybe five minutes, checked the battery and realised that when I wasn’t using the car, a fault meant that the fan which blows fresh air into the car was drawing electricity from the battery even when the car wasn’t being used. So, the solution – switch off the fan when I’m not driving the car. That seemed to me to be better and somewhat cheaper than scrapping the car and buying a new one.
We’re already ‘outnumbered’
Hopefully you’ll all have seen the story about White British being a minority within 40 years. It was covered in quite a few news outlets. Though, I’ve just done a quick check and can’t find any mention of this story on ‘our’ BBC. Quelle surprise!
Here’s one of the charts showing how White British will become a minority:
The problem for me is that White British are already a minority where it matters – in our major cities and towns. Let’s start with London:
White British: 43.4% of London’s population identifies as White British, compared to 78.4% for England and Wales overall.
Other White: 14.6% of Londoners identify as Other White.
Black African: 7.9% of London’s population identifies as Black African.
Indian: 7.0% of London’s population identifies as Indian.
Asian: 20.7% of London’s population identifies as Asian.
Black: 13.5% of London’s population identifies as Black.
Mixed/Multiple Ethnic: 5.7% of London’s population identifies as Mixed/Multiple Ethnic.
How about Birmingham:
White: 48.6%
Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME): 51.4%
Asian: 23.3%
British Pakistani: 17.0%
British Indian: 5.8%
Bangladeshi: 4.2%
Black: 7.9%
At the last census in 2021, White British were still in a majority in Manchester:
White: 57% (313,630)
Asian: 21% (115,113)
Black: 12% (65,891)
Mixed: 4.7%
Other Ethnic Groups
But only by a small margin and that may have changed by now.
Many of our major cities and towns are already lost to the invasion of multi-cultural enrichers. But within 40 years, we’ll probably have lost our whole country. Our rulers in the ConLibLab uniparty must know this. But they seem intent on destroying our country in order to turn Britain into a Third-World hell-hole. Who said the ‘Great Replacement’ was a crazed conspiracy theory? But as we now know, what was a supposed ‘conspiracy theory’ yesterday, soon turns out to have been true all along.
Who would have thought it? UK-loathing, globalist, Davos-man Starmer has suddenly become a great Churchillian British patriot promising to spend billions on improving our country’s military. Hooray for General Starmer!
But are we really sufficiently stupid to believe (IMHO) lying liar Starmer’s latest lies? The Britannica Dictionary definition of SMOKE SCREEN: “something that you do or say to hide something or to take attention away from something. ‘His campaign promises were just a smoke screen’.”
I would humbly suggest that there will be an almost infintessimal real increase in our military’s budgets. Instead, I believe that Starmer’s possibly surprising Damascene conversion to supposedly building up Britain’s defences is just a convenient smokescreen which is intended to kill two birds with just one stone.
Aim one is to try to counter the image Starmer has of being an anti-British, migrant-hugging, EU UN and WEF stooge. But the key aim is to provide a convenient cover for Reeves to raise taxes again and again and again. Now Starmer and Reeves can claim that they have to raise taxes, not because they have trashed the economy with Reeves’s budget from hell, but because Labour are tremendous patriots and need more of our cash to build up our military.
Yogi Berra told us that predictions are hard to make, especially about the future:
But I predict Reeves will push up taxes supposedly to spend on our defence, but that almost all the extra revenue raised will be squandered on enormous pay rises for our useless over-paid, over-pensioned, incompetent, self-serving, parasitic, Labour-adoring, skive-from-home public sector.
Oh, and while we’re on the subject of (not) defending Britain, I noticed that Operation Sea Lion, the planned German invasion of Britain, intended to use about 90,000 German troops in the first wave of attacks. Under Starmer, we can expect around 50,000 Third-World invaders this year. Fewer than Operation Sea Lion, but an invasion of military-age, UK-hating men nevertheless and, like the Operation Sea Lion troops, all dedicated to conquering Britain and destroying anything of value in our country.
First, here’s a rumour which might be true. The Chinese Communist Party is rather displeased with the economic collapse of China which has caused many Chinese businesses to go bankrupt mainly due to the Trump-Xi standoff and tariff wars. As a consequence Xi ‘Winnie the Pooh’ PingPong may yesterday’s man and his successor may already be moving into Xi PinPong’s office.
Further rumours suggest that PingPong has agreed the conditions of his departure and these include protection for his family possibly by them avoiding prosecution for becoming eye-wateringly rich during PingPong’s premiership.
Paris lies, lies and more lies?
As most of the photos of the Paris riots after PSG won some football match are taken at night, it’s difficult to see the colour and thus ethnicity of the rioting supposed football fans. We have been told repeatedly that the rioters were PSG fans. But there are strong indications that the rioters were actually an army of multi-cultural enrichers invading the centre of Paris from the migrant ghettos which enrcircle Paris mainly outside the Boulevard Périphérique. Certainly, the burning of cars, looting of shops, shooting fireworks at the police and harassment of females look more like the standard modus operandi of our multi-cultural friends.
I can’t provide definite evidence of this claim. But here are two videos which both at the start suggest that Third-Worlders, rather than French football fans, were really the main participants in the riots and destruction. But, of course, nobody in our mainstream media would dare admit that if it is true. Much better for us plebs to be told that ‘far right’ football thugs were the cause of the problem.
One of the great lies (among so many) put out by Labour’s Mad Ed MIliband and his scientifically-challenged Labour Party chums is that UK electricity prices are so high due to high international gas prices. And, of course, they blame Mr Putin ad nauseam and claim that the only way to get UK electricity prices down is to get rid of gas and replace it with supposedly ‘cheaper’ renewables.
So, let’s just do a simple test of the veracity or otherwise of Labour’s and Mad Red Ed’s claims.
Here’s a chart of UK electricity prices from 2019 to 2025:
And here’s a chart of international natural gas prices from 2020 to 2025:
Are the two related? Certainly from 2020 to mid 2022, the two charts seem to correlate. Gas prices and UK electricity prices shot up following the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But the collapse in international gas prices towards the second half of 2022 back towards the 2020 level has not been in any way matched by a corresponding fall in UK electricity prices. In fact, while international gas prices were back around the 2020 level, the UK’s electricity prices remained about 40% higher than they were in 2020.
Hmmm. What could be the reason for that you might wonder. Could it be the billions we are paying every year in subsidies for Johnson’s, Sunak’s and now the Starmer/Miliband’s useless, expensive, intermittent and unreliable wind turdbines desecrating our landscape and slaughtering birds and the solar parks covering once fertile, productive agricultural land?
I think most of us know the answer. So, don’t believe the Starmer/Miliband “clean energy superpower” nonsense. We are being naturalgaslit by our incompetent, UK-hating rulers as they make our lives poorer and more miserable in their West-loathing crusade for degrowth as they enthusiastically bankrupt British companies and households with crushing energy costs in order to turn Britain into an impoverished, hopeless, basket-case Third-World country.
When a driver rammed into a bunch of people in Liverpool who were celebrating Liverpool winning one of the so many football competitions which we have now that there seem to enough for every team to win something, we were told astonishingly quickly that the alleged perpetrator was “a 53-year-old white man”. The mainstream media then went into a frenzy of praise for our police’s supposed wonderful transparent new policy of openness about the suspect’s ethnicity when someone allegedly commits a dreadful crime. However, when a prisoner stabbed a prison officer injuring him so badly that he had to be airlifted to hospital, we didn’t get any information about the age and ethnicity of the prisoner. Though one can assume that, as the alleged stabber was already in prison, the authorities were well aware of his ethnicity. And when a driver crushed a police officer’s legs by allegedly reversing into the officer seven times, we weren’t told the ethnicity of this alleged perpetrator either.
A cynic might thus be tempted to believe that the wonderful new police policy of openness only applies when the alleged criminal is white. When the alleged criminal is from one of our multi-culturally enriching communities, I think we can expect a continuing deafening silence as to the alleged criminal’s ethnicity.
Do you trust Keir Starmer?
While we’re on the subject of liars, here’s a short clip from a speech Keir Starmer made from some factory somewhere. With rolled up sleeves to show he is a practical, get-stuck-in-there man of the people, Starmer launched a blitzkrieg attack on Nigel Farage by asking anyone who could be bothered to listen whether they would trust Nigel Farage with their jobs and pensions and the economy and suchlike:
So perhaps we should consider a few questions like:
would you trust Starmer to control illegal immigration?
would you trust Starmer to enforce border control?
would you trust Starmer to negotiate a good deal with his beloved EU?
would you trust Starmer to enact policies to grow the UK economy?
would you trust Starmer to bring Mad Ed Miliband under control in order to lower our highest-in-the-world energy prices?
would you trust Starmer to protect British territories like the Chagos Islands, the Falklands and GIbraltar?
would you trust Starmer to bring us lower taxes to, as he claims, “put more money into people’s pockets“?
would you trust Starmer to protect free speech in the UK?
would you trust Starmer to bring our profligate, incompetent, useless public services under control and cut public spending in order to “fix the foundations” of our bankrupt economy?
would you trust Starmer to ensure that the law applies to everybody equally regardless of their ethnicity and religion?
would you trust Starmer to always stand up for the interests of British people?
would you trust Starmer with anything?
For a few years, the polling company YouGov has been running a bi-monthly survey which includes a question on how trustworthy people believe the main politicians are. Here are the latest results for Starmer:
As you’ll see, the percent who view Starmer as being “untrustworthy” has more than doubled from around 20% to 56%. But what astonishes me most about this chart is that even just over 20% of people see Starmer as “trustworthy”. Who are these idiots? I guess they’re all Guardian readers and BBC believers. Nobody else could be so stupid.
Here’s a rather unpleasant (or very unpleasant) story from that Scandinavian migrant hell-hole (sorry, I meant ‘Scandinavian socialist paradise’) Sweden. It seems like Sweden has its particularly Scandinavian version of the Rotherham, Rochdale, Oldham, Oxford etc etc rape gangs scandal.
About 58% of men convicted in Sweden of rape and attempted rape over the past five years were born abroad, according to data from Swedish national TV. Public broadcaster SVT said it had counted all court convictions to present a complete picture in Sweden. But Sweden had thousands more reported rapes, and there is no ethnic breakdown for those. Moreover, many thousands more rapes will go unreported.
There are many reasons why thousands of rapes in Sweden are not being reported. One may be that victims are too ashamed to go to the police. Another could be that victims may have been threatened by the rapists. But one of the saddest reasons for the under-reporting of rapes is that many rapes are committed on elderly Swedish women with dementia by their migrant ‘carers’. So the grannies may not even remember that they have been raped. And even if they can remember that they have been raped, they may be so confused that they don’t know how to report that they have been sexually abused.
Here’s the story of Sweden’s elderly rape scandal on Spiked:
I haven’t watched the BBC series where Simon Reeve travels around Scandinavia. But I rather suspect that this is one aspect of Scandinavian life he will ‘forget’ to mention.
First, I hope you noticed that, in the first news reports about a car ploughing into crowds celebrating some football thing in LIverpool, the BBC stressed 2 or 3 times that the man arrested was “a 53-year-old white British man“. Amazing how such information can be released so quickly when similar information about the identity of the Southport murderer was withheld for so long. And when information was eventually released, we were told the Southport murderer was “a Welsh choirboy”:
“The Great British Giveaway“
We Brits should be very proud – very proud of our extraordinary generosity. Our country is to all intents and purposes bankrupt. Our national debt is around 95.5% of GDP and rising. Our debt/GDP is lower than countries like Greece (158.2%), Italy (136.3%), France (113.8%), Belgium (105.6%) and Spain (104.3%). But is rather embarrassingly higher than Estonia (24.0%), Bulgaria (24.6%), and Luxembourg (26.6%). Moreover, every year we pay around £100bn on debt interest which is also rising. But, in spite of being increasingly bankrupt, we spray our borrowed money on anyone who isn’t British, while our government finds ever more new and exciting ways to extract our money to pay for our generosity.
Let’s look at just a few of our extravagances:
The ludicrous Chagos giveaway – we are giving British territories away to Mauritius and also paying Mauritius around £30bn over the next 99 years to take territories to which Mauritius has no legal claim. The population of Mauritius is only around 1.261 million. So, if we’re giving that dump say £300 million a year that’s almost £300 to every Mauritian citzen. But, of course, most Mauritians will never see any of that money. According to the Transparency International Corruption Index, Mauritius is one of the world’s more corrupt countries on a similar level as such earthly paradises as Rwanda, Saudi Aabia, Georgia and Oman. So we can expect to see an awful lot of very very happy Mauritian politicians, bureaucrats and businesspeople over the next 99 years. What will Starmer do next? Give billions to Spain to take Gibraltar? Give billions more to Argentina to take the oil-rich Falklands? After all, we have so much money we can seemingly afford to keep funding the Great British Giveaway forever.
The Channel illegal migrants – these people apparently pay thousands of pounds or dollars or euros or whatever to what the (IMHO) lying, UK-hating, globalist scumbag Keir Starmer calls ‘evil people smuggling gangs‘. Yet if these illegal migrants can afford the smugglers’ fees, why are we giving them free accommodation in 4-star hotels, free new clothes, free new smartphones, free spending money, free legal aid to fight deportation and much much more? Why? Apparently because we’re a very generous country and enjoy throwing our money away on anyone except British citizens. Our generosity is costing us at least £7 billion or £8 billion a year just in hotel costs. When you throw in all the other things we shower on these Third-World often uneducated, often unemployable, often criminal, often West-loathing invaders, the real amounts must be astronomical.
The Foreign Aid fiasco – and then there’s foreign aid. We give over £10bn a year to the world’s most corrupt countries. And this massive giveaway seems to increase almost every year.
And the more we give, the richer the ruling elites in the recipient countries become while their citizens seem to become ever poorer.
Money for nothing – Our generosity doesn’t just extend to foreigners. Once people live in Britain, we seem to prioritise anyone but Brits. According to our government’s own statistics, the overall unemployment rate in 2022 was 4%. Around 3% of white people were unemployed in 2022, compared with 6% of people from all other ethnic groups combined. People from the combined Bangladeshi and Pakistani (9%), Asian ‘other’ (7%) and black (7%) ethnic groups had the highest unemployment rates out of all ethnic groups while white people had the lowest unemployment rates out of all ethnic groups (3%). Out of all regions, Yorkshire and the Humber had the highest unemployment rates for people from the mixed (15%), ‘other’ (15%), and combined Pakistani and Bangladeshi (12%) ethnic groups. When explaining why some ethnic groups seem to live off British taxpayers more than others, our government explained: “The reasons for poor labour market outcomes for certain ethnic groups are complex”.
So, here’s a message to all the world’s most useless and corrupt countries – if you want money, just ask Starmer or, better still, come to Britain. We Brits are extremely generous with the money we pay in taxes in “The Great British Giveaway”.
David Craig, on June 13th, 2025
