And here’s some of the text that went with that picture:
Over 82.5% of parents in Pakistan are first cousins, 6.8% are blood relatives, 6.3% belong to the same caste and family, and only 4.4% are married out of their families.
A lot of international studies carried out in different parts of the world have also confirmed the hazards of consanguineous marriages and have suggested a comprehensive ban on cousin marriages across the globe. However in Pakistan, ignorance, caste superiority and complexes are main hurdles in the way of reducing the number of cousin marriages.
The study says that there is a 20 percent chance that the children can acquire a genetic problem. The data also shows that the infant mortality risk is higher (over 1.2%) in first-cousin marriages and in terms of birth defects, the risks rise from about 2% in the general population to 4% when the parents are closely related.
Talking to Pakistan Today, Dr Aslam Khan said a human being carries gene mutations which are recessive (hidden) and when families interbreed, these mutations could become dominant and may start showing more expression in the population. “But when a population has a small gene pool the gene mutation can become more frequent,” he said, adding that in consanguineous marriage, disorders which include blindness, deafness, skin diseases, and neurodegenerative conditions become more common”.
This all comes, not from some rabid Izlumophiliac, but from the respected Pakistan Today newspaper.
Now let’s move to Britain
While many lot of babies born of first cousin marriages die soon after birth, Of the inbred babies who do not die right away, a large number of them have so many physical and mental disabilities, that UK taxpayers are forced to bear the costs of caring for these genetic freaks for the rest of their lives.
A BBC investigation in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin.
Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths. One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the risk that the child dies during labor increases by 50 percent. The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders — e.g., cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy — is 18 times higher.
And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 (criterion for being “retarded”) increases 400 percent among children from cousin marriages.
Multi-cultural impoverishment?
So, who is really wrecking the NHS and social services?
Is it old people who are living too long after working and paying taxes all their lives? Maybe? Or maybe old people are healthier than they have ever been and aren’t as much a strain on the NHS and social services as the progressive liberal elites like to suggest?
Is it the morbidly obese? Observing some of the fat whales waddling around ASDA with their trollies full of crisps and burgers, one could see that they are certainly a burden. Though on my recent visits to hospital, the fattest people I saw were the hospital staff.
Or is everyone afraid to point the finger of blame where it really should be pointed – first-cousin marriages – because to mention that would be waaccissst, and Izlumophobic and divisive and supposed ‘hate speech’?
Here’s a picture of two men who are being sought by the Met Police for raping another man. The rape took place on 24 October 2018. But the Met police have only just released the pictures. So one could wonder why it took useless politically-correct Cressida Dick’s useless politically-correct Met Police so long to release the cctv pictures:
The Met Police describe the men as being “white Eastern Europeans”. Hmmm. I’m not quite sure I fully buy that description. Perhaps the fact that the two supposedly “white Eastern Europeans” don’t really look like “white Eastern Europeans” may explain the worthless Met Police’s delay in releasing the pictures? I guess the Met Police were busy trying to think up a description of the men which didn’t mention what they really look like?
Who knows? Who would trust anything our police say anymore?
Of course, the rape victim may have given the Met Police information indicating that the two rapists were “white Eastern European”. But in my humble opinion, these two “white Eastern Europeans” look awfully like some of these fine chaps:
Furthermore, I suspect the the worthless, Met Police don’t really want to catch these men at all and probably only released the pictures (months after the event) under pressure from the victim and/or his family to give the impression the Met Police were actually doing something.
I further suspect that if a white Brit were to chuck a brick or a bacon sandwich through a mosque window, the Met Police would issue crystal clear cctv pictures within a few hours of the ‘hate crime’ in order to catch the evil perpetrators. But when two men (possibly from a multi-culturally enriching background) rape another man, we only get two blurry cctv pictures several months after the crime.
The whole think stinks.
And here, for those who haven’t seen it, is a video I made about how I believe the (IMHO) total waste of skin, Cressida Dick, became the big boss of the Met police (with thanks to Gilbert and Sullivan):
At the time, the world’s climatologists all apparently agreed that the Earth was warming so rapidly that the polar ice caps would melt and many major coastal cities would become uninhabitable. Helpfully, the newspaper also had a nice picture of how Manhattan would definitely be under water within a few decades due to the supposed rapid melting of the polar ice caps:
Here’s another nice picture of how Manhattan could soon be under water due to the supposed rapid melting of the polar ice caps.
This scare story was from 2010 and is still ongoing.
In the meantime – between the 1934 “we’re all going to die from global warming” scare story and the 2010 “we’re all going to die from global warming” scare story – the world’s leading climatologists all agreed that we were heading for a new Ice Age. So we were actually all going to freeze to death from the cold, not drown from melting ice caps due to warming.
In 1974, 42 of them wrote a letter to President Nixon warning of the catastrophic effects of a new Ice Age in just the same way that the same supposed ‘experts’ are now warning of the catastrophic effects of Global Warming
Here’s part of the text of the 1974 letter to Nixon:
Dear Mr. President:
Aware of your deep concern with the future of the world, we feel obliged to inform you on the results of the scientific conference held here recently. The conference dealt with the past and future changes of climate and was attended by 42 top American and European investigators. We enclose the summary report published in Science and further publications are forthcoming in Quaternary Research.
The main conclusion of the meeting was that a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experience by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon.
The cooling has natural cause and falls within the rank of processes which produced the last ice age. This is a surprising result based largely on recent studies of deep sea sediments.
Existing data still do not allow forecast of the precise timing of the predicted development, nor the assessment of the man’s interference with the natural trends. It could not be excluded however that the cooling now under way in the Northern Hemisphere is the start of the expected shift. The present rate of the cooling seems fast enough to bring glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present pace.
The practical consequences which might be brought by such developments to existing social institution are among others:
(1) Substantially lowered food production due to the shorter growing seasons and changed rain distribution in the main grain producing belts of the world, with Eastern Europe and Central Asia to be first affected.
(2) Increased frequency and amplitude of extreme weather anomalies such as those bringing floods, snowstorms, killing frosts, etc
You’ll possibly be pleased to see that the new Ice Age was supposed to increase the “frequency and amplitude” of extreme weather events. Exactly the same claim the Warmies are now making about supposed Global Warming. So, in the 1970s, every time there was a big storm or flooding or hot weather or cold weather this was definite proof of global cooling. But now every time there’s a big storm or flooding or hot weather or cold weather this is definite proof of global warming. How convenient!
In the 1970s, a gentleman who became the voice of the world’s climatologists (a bunch of people just as reliable as astrologists) was John P Holdren. He wrote a series of apocalyptic articles about how the new Ice Age would lead to massive crop failures in the Northern hemisphere, starvation and a migration of people from North to the South. John P. Holdren then did a spectacular reverse ferret and later became Saint Obama’s key adviser on (yup, you guessed it) supposed global warming.
Is the Earth warming? Or is it cooling? We don’t know. And does human activity have any effect on the climate? Probably not.
The only thing we do know is that, whatever the supposed ‘scientific consensus’, there will always be plenty of ‘scientists’ and media ‘experts’ and power-hungry politicians eager to jump on whatever is fashionable bandwagon in order to further their own lousy careers and increase their own self-importance and power over us.
I am a brainless, progressive, lefty, BBC-believing, virtue-signalling, rapefugee-hugging, brain-dead snowflake.
I believe that all cultures are equal, that there is no evil anywhere in the world, that sh*t-hole countries are sh*t-holes because of nasty waacisst Western colonialists and that if we all sat around – people of every race – lit candles, held hands, welcomed rapefugees and sang ‘Kumbaya’ then the world would be a peaceful place full of love and multi-culturalism and diversity and harmony and no crime.
But sadly, not everyone is like me. Not everyone is a progressive, brain-dead, narcissistic, virtue-signalling, rapefugee-hugging idiot like me.
There are some people, believe it or not, who think that some cultures are better than others, who don’t believe what the BBC tells us, who believe that some places are total sh*t-holes because their inhabitants are violent, dangerous, low-IQ, semi-morons and that importing millions of illiterate, uneducated, probably low-IQ, violent, rape-obsessed, deeply criminal semi-morons from Africa and the Middle East will be a disaster for once civilised, once cultured, once democratic Europe:
Here’s one of these people who don’t agree with me.
First some good news that the BBC and C4 News might have ‘forgotten’ to report – following the election of the patriotic Bolzonaro in Brazil, one of his first acts as president was to pull out of the UN Global Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration – the agreement that makes migration a human right. The reason for Brazil pulling out – the new president believed that each country should have the right to control its own borders.
Remember, that’s the agreement that the British Government signed up to which was hardly mentioned anywhere in the UK mainstream media. Perhaps the BBC and C4 News ‘forgot’ to report that as well?
Better check your mattress
Have you bought a new mattress recently? If so, I suggest you jump up and down on it a few times. Then if your mattress says “ouch“, you might want to cut it open to see if there’s a multi-cultural enricher inside:
Apparently these two supposedly “impoverished” Africans each paid about $5,000 to people smugglers to hide them in mattresses and transport them into Spain and a life of luxury living off benefits and drug-dealing somewhere in Europe:
And, of course, once in Europe they would have unlimited opportunities to rape white girls for entertainment:
Sadly for them their great plan didn’t quite work and they were caught at the border. But as Spain is a signatory to the UN Global Pact for Safe and Orderly Migration, no doubt these two wonderful people will be allowed into Europe to enrich our society in the only way they know how. As the video below reports – instead of being sent straight back to whatever sh*t-hole they came from, these two enrichers are “being processed by a Spanish immigration centre”.
Perhaps they’ll even be able to come to Britain? Let’s hope so. We really need highly qualified, productive, hard-working migrants like these two.
Meanwhile, the Royal Navy has added extra ships in the Channel to act as free ferry services for anyone wanting to leave safe France to come to Benefits Britain.
Forgive my ignorance, but WTF is the point of having border guards if they actually help illegal migrants across the border from Africa to Europe or if, in the case of Britain, our own navy provides a free, luxury ferry service with food, drinks and healthcare for anyone leaving the French coast?
Oh, I forgot. It’s now the human right of any ignorant, illiterate, unemployable, violent, low-IQ, scumbag from any self-inflicted sh*t-hole on the planet to move to Europe.
If you go to the Leave Means Leave website, just by entering your postcode you can send a pre-written email to your MP demanding that he/she abides by the 2016 vote to leave the EU.
I just did this and received a pre-written reply from my MP in which he claims it wasn’t clear what we were voting for and that the referendum was so long ago that the result should no longer be considered valid. My feelings on reading my MP’s rely cannot be expressed here in polite language:
You are receiving this email as you have contacted me regarding the Brexit deal, whilst I would have liked to respond to each one individually, unfortunately this has proven to be an impossible task due to time limitations. As I am sure you can imagine, I have received more correspondence on this issue than any that has come before. I am grateful for the hundreds of emails and letters sharing views, asking questions and encouraging me to support a variety of different proposals. These vary from supporting the Government’s proposal, to voting against it in order to either leave the EU with no deal (with a view to strike a harder Brexit), to negotiate a Norway Plus model, or hold a second referendum. I understand and appreciate how emotive this topic is, and have taken the time to carefully consider every argument presented to me. At no given time during this process has there been a consistent majority in favour of any one possible scenario. A number of factors must be considered. As a constituency, Bournemouth East voted 55% in favour of leaving the EU. In May 2017, the two main parties (82.4% of the electorate) stood on manifestos to honour a ‘smooth and orderly Brexit.’ I have always been clear on my position to respect the result of the referendum and ensure my constituents have reason to continue to trust the democratic process. In 2015 we knew this was an issue too big for Parliament alone to decide, and therefore it was put to the public to exercise direct democracy. As we know the nation voted to leave the EU – but in the absence of any manifesto stipulating what leaving the EU actually meant, the Prime Minister had to interpret the arguments made and respond with a proposal. The deal that was put before Parliament returns control of our borders, laws and spending, provides for an orderly transition, and retains a workable partnership with Europe that will enable us to establish an essential future relationship. Where we are today is not where I wanted us to be. I want to see Britain playing a more influential role on the international stage, at a time when the world around us is getting more dangerous and complex. We are an outward looking country with a history of understanding and resolving the challenges that occur well beyond our shores. So, stepping away from an international organisation, such as the EU, even with the many flaws, does not seem logical. Britain’s strength, developed over millennia is its commitment to democracy. Regardless of my own views it is my democratic duty as an MP to honour the referendum result by supporting this Brexit deal. If this deal is not agreed by Parliament I cannot support Britain walking away with no deal. This would have detrimental impact on our economy, security and international credibility. The deal on the table therefore is the best available in honouring the referendum result. If Parliament cannot agree to support this deal we must recognise that the original mandate to leave (taken over two years ago) will begin to date, and will soon no longer represent a reflection of current intent. Once again I am grateful for constituents getting in touch. The complexity of this debate is reflected in differences of opinion at so many levels. Kind regards,
And here are a bunch of (IMHO) treacherous Remainers who are doing everything they can to keep us in the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic, German-run EU:
Somewhere in Crapistan, persecuted Christian Aasia Bibi is rotting away having been supposedly freed after 8 years condemned to death for supposedly ‘insulting the prophet’.
Whenever Third-world detritus wants to come to Britain, we’re told we must accept them because of Britain’s supposed ‘historical links’ to whatever sh*t-hole the often violent, often low-IQ, often illiterate, usually unemployable, usually West-hating, democracy-loathing people come from:
And there are plenty of virtue-signalling, braindead snowflakes who’ll demand we take in whatever human and subhuman garbage that washes up on our shores:
But when a Christian gets into a bit of trouble, our surrender to the Religion of Peace is so comprehensive that our Religion of Peace Home Secretary refuses to give this Christian asylum in Britain. As for the virtue-signalling, braindead snowflakes, I haven’t heard many of them demanding we give asylum to Crapistani Christian Aasia Bibi. In fact, I suspect the progressive lefties (and our Home Secretary) hope that Aasia Bibi is killed as soon as possible as she’s an embarrassment to them because her very existence exposes their hypocrisy and their hatred of Western civilisation.
Here are a couple of other examples of Britain’s surrender to the Religion of Wonderfulness:
Legal aid:
January 1. Four British jihadis, sentenced to life in prison for planning a major terror attack in Birmingham, received nearly £800,000 (€900,000; $1 million) in taxpayer-funded legal aid to cover their failed defense, according to information obtained through a freedom of information request. Khobaib Hussain, 25, Naweed Ali, 30, Mohibur Rahman, 33, and Tahir Aziz, 38, received £790,485 to pay for lawyers. Some £635,822 went to the trial lawyers; each of the defendants was represented by a Queen’s Counsel and junior barrister. The billing process is not yet complete; the final figure likely to be higher.
We keep being told that legal aid budgets are being cut. But I guess this just applies to taxpaying, white indigenous Brits. If you’re a multi-cultural enricher, you can apparently have as much legal aid as you want.
Social care:
Another budget that is being cut is that for social care. So, many of Britain’s elderly are being left to rot without proper support in spite of having worked and paid taxes for most of their lives. But if you’re a 25- to 35-year-old multi-cultural enricher pretending to be just 16 or 17 years old, there’s plenty of money available for you.
January 3. Each lone child migrant in Britain costs taxpayers nearly £70,000 a year — £67,634 —according to the Association of Directors of Children’s Services. Expenses include £50,716 for residential placement and linked care costs, £4,805 for education, £3,915 for healthcare and £3,826 for social workers. For each lone child migrant, councils also typically pay £440 for interpreters and child advocates, £480 for English language lessons, £70 for dentists and £20 for doctor registration. Home Office statistics show that there are currently at least 4,500 unaccompanied youngsters seeking asylum in Britain — and costing taxpayers more than £300 million a year. Town halls are legally responsible for all costs associated with each child under their care until they are 25.
But if you dare criticise the preferential treatment of multi-cultural enrichers compared to the way taxpaying Brits are treated/neglected, then you’re immediately branded as a racist and bigot and a Nazi and a fascist and worse.
They say that you can find out who really rules you by finding out who you are not allowed to criticise. We are not allowed to criticise anyone or anything from the Religion of Total Peacefulness. I think that tells us all we really need to know about who really rules Britain:
Ever since their infamous “Hockey Stick” graph was shown to be based on fraudulent data, the Himalayan glaciers didn’t melt as predicted and the earth stopped warming more than 15 years ago, the Warmists have been desperately looking for a new weapon with which to attack anyone who didn’t subscribe to their Man-Made Global Warming cult.
The Warmists found their greatest weapon of mass deception when some guy called Cook (or should that be “Crook”?) published a study claiming that about “97% of scientists agreed that Global Warming was caused by human activity” (Anthropogenic Global warming – AGW). There’s only one problem – Mr Cook was (IMHO) either a liar or a buffoon.
Mr Cook’s group looked through the abstracts of 25 years of articles about supposed Global Warming – they didn’t read the actual articles! Based on just a few lines of each abstract (not the full article), they classed each article into one of 7 categories ranging from articles that appeared to endorse the AGW theory to those that rejected it.
The results were as follows:
1. Endorsed AGW with quantification – 65
2. Endorsed with no quantification – 934
3. “Implicit” endorsement – 2,934
4. Uncertain – 8,269
5. “Implicit” rejection – 53
6. Reject without quantification – 15
7. Reject with quantification – 10.
Total papers included – 12,280.
Then Mr Cook’s group did something very clever/dishonest (delete as appropriate). They took out the 8,269 papers which didn’t take a position. That left 3,933 papers which possibly endorsed the AGW theory and just 78 which rejected it. So suddenly you have just 4,011 papers which expressed an opinion and of these 3,933 (97%) could be interpreted as endorsing the AGW theory. This is madness. This is an absurd abuse of all mathematical and scientific processes.
Let’s look at the figures another way. There were 12,280 papers discussing supposed Global Warming. Of these, a minuscule 65 (0.5%) endorsed the AGW theory and were confident enough to quantify by how much the earth would warm. Then there were just 934 (7.6%) which endorsed the AGW theory, but were not confident enough to make any numerical predictions about the expected warming. So, we actually have a pathetic 8.1% that explicitly backed up the theory of AGW. This is laughable! And it’s rather far away from the claimed 97%!
Then we have a big bunch – 2,934 scientific papers (23.9%) – which Mr Cook’s group (perhaps creatively?) interpreted as “implicitly” supporting the AGW theory. So in total, out of the 12,280 abstracts reviewed, a mere 3,933 (32%) explicitly or “implicitly” could be interpreted as supporting the AGW theory and the rest (68%) either didn’t express an opinion or else disputed the AGW theory.
So, to claim that 97% of scientists agreed that humans were responsible for supposed Global Warming is utterly ludicrous. As usual with figures used by the Warmists, there seems to have been blatant manipulation of the data to prove a point that the data didn’t actually support.
It’s a pity that none of the politicians and journalists who have parroted the “97% claim” bothered to look at the original figures as I have done.
But there’s one thing we can be sure of – at least 97% of the gullible idiots being produced by today’s Snowflake Indoctrination Centres (schools and universities) are utterly convinced that world-renowned climatologist Chicken Little’s predictions are correct.
Here’s Paul Joseph Watson to start off the year. He helpfully shows that being a holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, self-righteous, naive, snowflake, rapefugee-hugging lefty idiot can seriously damage your health.
But where do all these holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, self-righteous, naive, snowflake, rapefugee-hugging, lefty idiots come from? Here’s a clue: our universities, which have been transformed into snowflake indoctrination centers for the mentally gullible. Young people graduating from university today probably know less than they did before they entered ‘uni’. At their beloved ‘uni’ they become experts in anti-knowledge, or “fake facts” that they think are true.
For example, nearly all college graduates today believe that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant that will destroy the planet. Yet any honest scientist who graduated a generation earlier will confirm that carbon dioxide is the single most important nutrient for plants, responsible for the “greening” of rainforests, food crops, grasslands and even aquatic ecosystems. CO2 is the molecule of life, yet college graduates have been indoctrinated with anti-knowledge that claims CO2 is a poison.
As for different cultures, our universities and progressive media have brainwashed the gullible into believing that white Western-European culture is somehow responsible for all the evils in the world and that cultures like our mostest favouritest wonderfullest religion are as good as, if not superior to, Western culture.
As Paul Joseph Watson so admirably shows, when one of these indoctrinated, progressive, snowflakes meets reality, the results are often not pretty – for the lefty, rapefugee-hugging snowflake.
This is just to say that I have seen the video of one of the Scandinavian girls being beheaded in Morocco by our friends from the world’s most wonderfullest, peacefullest religion.
It is brutal. One of the men puts a foot on the poor girl’s head while another cuts her throat while she is screaming. Then the throat-cutter starts hacking away at the girl’s neck to remove her head completely. It seems the knife he is using is quite blunt as this takes some time before the head is fully removed. I suspect that all this time, the girl is still alive and can feel what’s happening to her. But she can no longer scream in agony as her vocal cords have been cut through. In the meantime, gurgling sounds are coming from the girl as her blood gushes out while the men talk and laugh while one hacks and hacks and hacks away at the girl’s neck with the blunt knife till the girl’s head is eventually severed from her body. The men then toss the severed head onto the ground
I won’t provide the link as this would probably make me guilty of breaking some law or other – Izlumophobia, waaacisssm, who knows? I do know that in Sweden, sharing this video can get you up to four years in prison. Yet returning ISIS fighters get new identities, free homes, free money, free everything despite the many people they will have beheaded, mutilated, crucified, burnt alive and murdered in the name of their god.
I believe we were told that only one of the girls had been beheaded. But I have seen pictures of both girls’ severed heads, so I suspect that, as usual, we’re not getting the whole truth. In fact, I suspect that if the attackers had not uploaded this video of the beheading themselves, we would never have found out that one (or both) girls was/were beheaded. Instead, the brutal nature of their deaths would have been covered up to protect you know who.
I also know that in Sweden it was reported that the murders had nothing to do with our loveliest religion and that the girls had died from ‘knife wounds to the neck’. Yup, I guess that’s one way of describing having your head being hacked off with a blunt knife in a process taking several, no doubt agonising and terrifying, minutes
It’s a funny old world when communicating an atrocity by our friends from our favouritest religion is considered almost as great a (and in Sweden a greater) offence than the atrocity itself.
Rather than being desperately censored by our supine rulers (who are so afraid of Izlum they won’t give asylum to Pakistani Christian Aasia Bibi), perhaps this video of the Scandinavian girl’s brutal beheading should be played on every TV channel and in every school in the country so we can face up to the truth about the greatest threat Western civilisation has ever faced. This would be better than sleep-walking to our extinction.
(p.s. About a week after writing this, I finally found out that both girls had in fact been beheaded. I’m not sure that any of the UK mainstream media have reported this. I believe that, if the murderers had not posted a video of one of the beheadings, then we would have been told that the girls had died in a ‘hiking accident’ or something like that. After all, you know what is a religion of peace so it would have been impossible for members of this great religion to slaughter two beautiful, life-enhancing girls in such an awful way)
David Craig, on January 16th, 2019
