February 2018
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728  

How our lying charities perpetuate poverty

(Wednesday/Thursday blog)

Readers will all be aware of the current wave of scandals hitting our politically-correct, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, greed-driven charities. It appears that many charity and aid workers with big salaries and even bigger expense accounts – the Lords of Poverty – sent to poor countries and disaster zones were exploiting their positions of wealth and power to f*ck anything that moves – particularly if that anything was aged between 10 and 15 years old. Sometimes the charity f*ckers paid money to their often underage victims sometimes they just gave them a little extra food or some badly-needed medicine for their families that we paid for.

But the real scandal with our foreign aid charities is that they claim to be trying to eradicate poverty when actually they are knowingly perpetuating it.

We’re all tackling poverty – the big lie

Here are the mission statements of a few of the better-known anti-poverty charities:

They all look rather similar, don’t they? They’re all reducing or ending poverty – supposedly.

Now let’s look at what has happened over the last 30 or so years. In China, where our anti-poverty charities don’t operate, over 600 million people have been taken out of poverty (living on $1.90 or less per day). In Africa, where all our charities are busy spending billions supposedly reducing or ending poverty, around 600 million more people have been pushed into into poverty. How could this remarkable situation arise? How were the Chinese so successful when our charities have failed so dismally?

What about over-population and corruption? Could they be the reasons for the catastrophic failure of our wealthy charities in Africa?

The perpetuation of poverty

Here I’d like to paraphrase Charles Dickens’s Mr Micawber: “Population growth 2%, economic growth 4% – result happiness (less poverty). Population growth 4%, economic growth 2% – result misery (more poverty)”. The Chinese understood this and instituted their incredibly successful “one child” policy (which the libtards in the West criticised so much) while pushing economic growth above the level of population growth – result happiness for 600 million people.

The population of most African countries is doubling every 20-25 years while most have stagnant economies or economies that are shrinking due to civil tribal wars as ever more people fight over limited resources of things like land, water and mineral wealth. So, what do you think happens? Yup, another 600 million people in poverty over the last 30 years. Moreover, here’s the UN 2012 projection for the population of Africa:

There are about 1.2 billion people in Africa now. Of these probably 800+ million are desperately poor and struggling to survive. By the end of this century, there will be 3.57 billion Africans though I have a feeling that since 2012, the UN have upped their projections to around 4 billion. But for the purpose of today’s blog, let’s stick with the ‘low’ figure of 3.57 billion. At  least 2.5 billion (and probably more) of these 3.57 billion people will be living in poverty or be desperately poor.

However much money we give, it will never be enough to feed, clothe and house all these people. Then, of course, the situation is made much worse by the all-pervasive corruption that affects every African country. The organisation Transparency International estimates that African rulers loot three times as much money each year from their countries as their countries receive in aid and foreign investment. That means that if we were to just cut African corruption by 50% we could stop all foreign aid and charity and African countries would still be richer.

Oh dear, did Oxscam and Save the Children and the Red Cross and others of their ilk forget to tell you that?

The curse of political correctness

The only way to reduce poverty in Africa and other poor countries is to control population growth and cut corruption. But nobody dare say this as it would be “racist” and “imperialist” and “neo-colonialist” and even “fascist” etc etc to suggest that Africans should reduce their family sizes and that African rulers, businessmen and bureaucrats should reduce their corruption.

Oxscam and all the other charities know this. For over 30 years we’ve been paying for digging wells and providing food and tents and mosquito nets (that then get resold by the recipients) etc etc and in those 30 years, all the aid agencies and charities have achieved is an extra 600 million people in Africa who are poor or living in poverty.

Let them come to Europe?

Another blatant lie we are being told by the internationalists and globalists and UN is that if we open our borders to more Africans, we can help solve the problem of African poverty.

By the end of this century there will be at least 2.37 billion more Africans and probably over 2.5 billion of Africa’s projected population of 3.57 billion will be poor or living in poverty. How many should be bring to Europe? Ten million? Nope that wouldn’t make even a dent on the 2.5 billion desperate people. How about 50 million? Nope, still hardly solving the problems of the 2.5 billion poor. One hundred million? That won’t do much. Perhaps we should bring 500 million to Europe and totally destroy the European economy and civilisation? Yet even that won’t hugely reduce the number of poor in Africa.

Don’t believe the lies of the Lords of Poverty

Oxscam and Save the Children and Red Cross and all the others in their lucrative industry know that all the money we give will have little to no effect on reducing African poverty as long as population growth hugely outstrips economic growth and as long as African rulers keep looting their countries. But the charities and aid agencies say nothing and pretend that they are achieving something – which they are not.

They are all dishonest, greedy and self-serving and should not get any of our money!

And here, for any new readers, is a short (3 minutes) video I made about the “Foreign Aid Farce”:

They weren’t prostitutes! They were raped!

(Monday/Tuesday blog)

I have been struck down by the flu or something similar so won’t be writing much today. The only comment I’d like to make is that we should be careful when calling the girls (and boys?) f*cked by aid workers “prostitutes”. There is a huge difference between the ladies of Amsterdam, Hamburg and Kings Cross in London who could get jobs in shops or factories and still choose to earn a (much better) living by selling sex and the girls (and boys?) forced by poverty, destitution or natural disaster to sell the only thing they have left to sell – their bodies.

Personally, I can see nothing wrong with aid workers using real prostitutes. However to exploit the desperate and destitute – the very people the aid workers are extremely well-paid to help – for sex is extremely close to rape and should be treated as such. The sight of a couple of these hypocritical, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, exploitative, libtard bastards being prosecuted and then jailed in the countries where they committed their crimes would soon send a signal that their ‘fun’ is over.

And here’s a comment from a Times reader:

“I live in SE Asia, and find this whole story very bizarre. In countries like Cambodia or Vietnam the charity / NGO / UN-subsidiary workers were almost the only people with vast amounts of spending money. And they spent most of it in girly bars, which were about the only entertainment venues for foreigners (there were local places that were a lot of fun, but they wouldn’t have been seen dead mixing with the people they had come to ‘help’). Any night, you could see rows of their hugely expensive top-of-the-range SUVs parked outside, with the name of the organisation blazoned proudly down the side. They made no attempt to be sneaky about it, and yet suddenly everyone’s surprised?”

Oh, and you’ve probably read that yet another (IMHO) self-righteous, preachy, holier-than-thou, lefty virtue-signaller, Brendan Cox husband to murdered MP Jo Cox, has had to leave his position in 2 or 3 charities because of ‘problems’ with his behaviour. He was apparently allowed to resign before investigations into his activities were completed. So I guess we’ll never find out what the jolly chap was up to. The usual lefty cover up? Of course not! Just a coincidence!

And to cheer us all up, here are two possibly inbred, probably rather intolerant and rather unintelligent idiots from the Religion of Progress and Peace trying to throw stones at a synagogue in France (click on the headline below to watch the very short video clip):

POETIC JUSTICE: Two Muslims in hoodies caught on CCTV pelting stones at a synagogue in France

Harsh laws for us – no laws for them?

(Friday/weekend blog)

Hooray for Female Genital Mutilation (FGM)!

I found the video below about FGM quite difficult to watch. In fact I felt quite squeamish and stopped watching during the first couple of minutes.

The NHS in England recorded 5,391 new cases of FGM in the past year.

Almost half involved women and girls living in London, NHS Digital found. A third were women and girls born in Somalia, while 112 cases were UK-born nationals. Most of the cases were spotted by midwives and doctors working in maternity and obstetric units. The majority had originally had FGM done to them abroad and as a young child.

The practice is illegal in the UK , has been illegal for around 30 years and it is compulsory for family doctors, hospitals and mental health trusts to report any new cases in their patients.

FGM – intentionally altering or injuring the female external genitalia for non-medical reasons – potentially carries a sentence of up to 14 years in jail. But as far as I know, there haven’t been more than 2 prosecutions, if that. Yet you would have thought that it would be something that was fairly easy to prove.

One law for us – no laws for them?

Once again, it seems that under our ever-so-progressive, ever-so-liberal libtard politicians and police, our laws are applied selectively. If white indigenous Brits commit animal cruelty, we are prosecuted by the RSPCA and the authorities. Yet our friends from the Religion of Progress and Peace (ROPP) are allowed to continue with their cruel Halal slaughter and nobody bleats a word in protest. In fact, they are helped by our rulers’ refusal to force retailers to mark whether meat has been humanely or barbarically slaughtered

If a white, indigenous Brit was to rape an underage girl (especially a girl from migrant racial group) there would be all hell to pay. Yet for over 14 years gangs of supposed ‘Asians’ (actually members of the ROPP and mostly from Pakistan and Bangladesh) were allowed by the politicians and police to rape over 50,000 white under-age British girls in towns across Britain and nobody did anything. Eventually, when the scandal broke, there were a few token prosecutions.

Under the (IMHO) inept, UK-hating Director of Public Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, any white Brit expressing any views any other person finds ‘hostile’ can be prosecuted for a supposed ‘hate crime’. But preachers from our favourite religion are allowed to go on spouting their hate-filled bile week after week and the police and authorities do absolutely nothing.

When a Brit leaves a bacon sandwich on the steps of a mosque, that’s a ‘hate crime’. When one of our friends from the ROPP blows up children and teenagers at a Manchester concert, the police and authorities claim there is no evidence that this was a ‘hate crime’.

We Brits are subject to British law and cannot claim any exemptions. But there are at least 30 Sharia courts operating in the UK. These should be illegal as the testimony of a woman is worth less than the testimony of a man. This means Sharia courts are guilty of sex discrimination. Plus they undermine British law. But you won’t hear the libtards and feminists protesting about Sharia courts and you won’t see the authorities acting to close them down.

Clitorises away!

I’m no expert on female anatomy, though I am always trying to improve my knowledge. So, for people like me, here’s a guide to the female vagina:

And apparently when you get your clitoris chopped off, you’re not going to have much fun having sex. Like wearing Darth Vader outfits and Sharia Courts, this is just another medieval practice enforcing male domination over women. But, of course, nobody ever thought about enforcing our laws against this barbarity.

And here are some ladies talking about the joys of having their bits cut off:

 

 

Stop starving the (fat) Palestinians! Horrible Mr Trump!

(Wednesday/Thursday blog)

The Capetown water crisis

First a small insight into the water crisis affecting Capetown:

With geniuses like that running the country, no wonder South Africa is falling apart and will soon turn into another Zimbabwe.

Are obese Palestinians really starving?

When democratically-elected President Trump recently cut financial aid to the Palestinians there were the usual howls of protest from the usual virtue-signalling, progressive Trump-loathing libtards. Several European countries are trying to make up for the loss of American funding and are quickly sending tens of millions of Euros to make up for the deficit. You can thank the mainstream media for this.

 

Here’s a typical pro-Palestinian piece of propaganda by the usual lying idiots:

Not so fast. Take a look at this video in Arabic from al-Jazeera, translated by MEMRI, which shows you the real situation in Gaza, which the mainstream media would rather you not see. 

If the situation in Gaza is as bad as many Western journalists and diplomats want you to believe, then why is Gaza’s life expectancy (74.2 years) now five years higher than the world averageThe World Health Organization has listed people in Gaza and the West Bank as among the most obese in the world, with women ranking #3 (5 places higher than the U.S.) and men ranking #8 for highest obesity rates.

So where are all the starving Palestinians?  Probably at the bustling, well-stocked glitzy shopping malls, the impressive children’s water park, the fancy restaurants and private clubs, the luxury hotels, the crowded food markets, and toy shops brimming with the latest plush toys:

(The video is quite long at 11 minutes, but you only need to watch a couple of minutes to get the real truth about the supposedly ‘starving’ Palestinians:

Europe’s three tribes?

(Monday/Tuesday blog)

Simplifying the situation slightly, it seems that there are three quite distinct tribes developing in Europe:

1. Anywheres

There are what have been called the “Anywheres”. These are the supposedly ‘progressive’ liberal elites. Their jobs and families aren’t under pressure from the tsunami of Third-World garbage pouring into Europe. In fact, they see migration as a benefit as they get cheaper plumbers, electricians, cleaners etc from Eastern Europe and never come into contact with the often in-bred, often criminal multi-cultural enrichers pouring over Europe’s non-existent borders.

The Anywheres would see things like patriotism and national pride as old-fashioned and bigotry. In Western European countries the Anywheres control politics, business, policing and the media. The Anywheres are more concerned about ‘issues’ than their countries.

Most of the laws made in Western European countries are made by the Anywheres for the benefit of the Anywheres. Hence the seemingly endless focus on equality and legalising gay marriage and promoting transgenderism and other such crap – issues which are alien to most ordinary people. The Anywheres are the people who invented the concept of ‘hate crimes’ and ‘hate speech’ to criminalise free speech and prevent anyone protesting about their plan to use mass immigration to erase national borders and force us all into one single, centrally-controlled EUSSR.

And, of course, the Anywheres are avid supporters of new taxes and restrictions to fight supposed ‘Climate Change’ (or Global Warming or whatever it’s called this week) even though these taxes and restrictions are leading to hundreds of thousands of job losses for ordinary people as our factories become uncompetitive and production moves to China and India.

In Britain the Anywheres are Remainers and they constantly hector us about the supposed financial consequences of leaving their much-adored European Union. Perhaps the Anywheres  can be summed up by Oscar Wilde’s phrase as “people who know the price of everything and the value of nothing” as the Anywheres, while bleating about the costs of Brexit, place no value at all on things like sovereignty, controlling your own borders, making your own laws and preserving communities.

2. Somewheres

A second group are the “Somewheres”. The Somewheres still value things like patriotism and national pride. The Somewheres want their countries to be ruled by their own politicians and not corrupt, unelected, self-serving bureaucrats under the control of the German Chancellor. Many Eastern European countries (Hungary, Poland, Austria etc) are ruled by the Somewheres.

The Somewheres are worried as they see their communities being destroyed by uncontrolled immigration and by de-industrialisation as their jobs move to China and other countries.

The Somewheres are people who want to belong to recognisable communities in recognisable countries with borders and their own laws, languages and traditions. The Somewheres see their cities and towns being taken over by a hostile, largely parasitical, often criminally violent invading army and their schools, health services and policing collapsing under the pressure of all the newcomers many of whom take and take and take without ever contributing anything.

The Somewheres understand the value of national sovereignty, proper  border control, community cohesion and belonging to a clearly recognisable group. The Somewheres in Britain, of course, voted to leave the EU and now see their Anywhere politicians and business leaders and media reneging on their promise to abide by the results of the UK EU Referendum. Laws in Western European countries are seldom made for the benefit of the Somewheres. The politicians supported by the Somewheres are always sneeringly dismissed as “right-wing” and “populist” (and even “fascist”) by Anywhere politicians and the Anywhere media.

3. The Ummah

Then there is a third tribe which will soon be the most populous ‘country’ in Europe even though nobody dares talk about this due to the Anywheres’ laws criminalising any criticism of any specific group. The members of the Religion of Progress and Peace (ROPP) form the Ummah. There are probably about 25 million of them in Europe now. By 2040 there will be over 50 million and by 2060, probably over 100 million.

From a very young age they are taught that their loyalty is to their religion and NOT to the countries where they happen to live. They are also taught that anyone outside their religion is inferior and should be conquered and forced into submission. As for the Jews, the ROPP has some very clear teachings on what should happen to them.

The ROPP does not believe in integration and accepting Western values, traditions and laws. Instead it teaches that the ROPP’s values, traditions and laws are superior to those of the West and should be imposed on the West.

The Anywheres and the Somewheres are in demographic decline due to falling birth rates among indigenous Europeans. The members of the Ummah are increasingly rapidly due to uncontrolled immigration and high birth rates.

Who will win?

These three tribes have virtually no understanding of each others’ beliefs and values and little interest in understanding each others’ beliefs and values.

It will be interesting to see which of these three tribes ends up victorious in the cultural, political, religious and probably military battles that lie ahead of us in Europe.

The Ummah – one of Europe’s largest countries?

(Friday/weekend blog)

One way of looking at what’s going on in Europe under Merkel and Soros is to contrast how Europeans see their continent with how our friends from the Religion of Progress and Peace (ROPP) see it.

The European View

The Europeans understand themselves as people who have historically inherited territories from their forefathers, traditionally clans and tribes. Each of these territories has a common language, identity and border. Those territories are to be found on the European continent.

Many of these European countries have joined an economic union, which has grown to include political aspects. There are currently 28 states within the European Union.

The European union is attractive to the many small countries in Europe. Together they perceive they can be represented better as a multicultural block on the world economic stage where America and China play a leading role. Neither Norway nor Iceland, Ukraine and Switzerland belong to the European Union.

The Ukraine and Russia are not considered part of this area.

The Europeans, under the leadership of the European Union, project a common understanding as a community open to the world. “Welcome Refugees”, the Willkommenskultur, is imposed with judicial measures.

Such an open EU without internal and external borders offers the population of any nation, any religion and any gender of the world the opportunity to resettle in European territory. Against the will of the indigenous folk and with the help of military forces (Frontex, NATO, airlifts from Africa, etc.)

The ROPP View

ROPP ideology foresees a strict discrimination not only between man and woman but also between (the good) Moozerlums and the Kafir (the bad unbelievers), in particular Christians and the hated Jews, but also including all other religions such as Hindus and Buddhists.

Moozerlums represent the mono-cultural Izlum, which lives together in the Ummah. The Ummah is a homogeneous Izlumic community that lives in an area without defined borders. The area is dynamic. Where country borders do exist, such as in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the borders are often porous and do not really represent borders as the Europeans understand this term.

The space where the Ummah lives represents a universal world order, which is ruled by the Caliph using Izlumic Sharia law, to which all inhabitants of the Ummah must be subservient.

As the Ummah expands, Christian and Jewish places of worship are either destroyed or reformed as mosques. The latter method is far quicker to implement than building. And as the Ummah expands whole parts of some cities become ‘no go’ areas for local inhabitants and the police – the public space is captured and consumed.

Comparing the populations of the 28 European Union member states — the national states — with the size of the Ummah — the young, mobile Izlumic population without borders — then it is evident that Izlum, the Ummah in 2017 has more mass than 82% of all the other European states.

(The countries marked in red are those with smaller populations than the Ummah)

Country Population Muslims Percent
01 Belgium 11,258,434 630,000 5.60%
02 Bulgaria 7,202,198 630,000 8.75%
03 Denmark 5,659,715 230,000 4.06%
04 Germany 82,301,678 4,760,000 5.78%
05 Estonia 1,315,944 0.00%
06 Finland 5,471,753 40,000 0.73%
07 France 66,991,000 4,710,000 7.03%
08 Greece 10,812,467 610,000 5.64%
09 United Kingdom 63,179,000 2,960,000 4.69%
England 53,010,000
Wales 3,063,000
Scotland 5,295,000
Northern Ireland 1,811,000
10 Ireland 4,625,885 50,000 1.08%
11 Italy 60,795,612 2,220,000 3.65%
12 Croatia 4,225,316 60,000 1.42%
13 Latvia 1,986,096 0.00%
14 Lithuania 2,921,262 0.00%
15 Luxembourg 562,958 10,000 1.78%
16 Malta 429,344 0.00%
17 Netherlands 17,100,475 1,000,000 5.85%
18 Austria 8,584,926 450,000 5.24%
19 Poland 38,567,614 0.00%
20 Portugal 10,374,822 30,000 0.29%
21 Romania 19,861,408 70,000 0.35%
22 Sweden 10,005,673 430,000 4.30%
23 Slovakia 5,421,349 0.00%
24 Slovenia 2,062,874 70,000 3.39%
25 Spain 46,468,102 980,000 2.11%
26 Czech Republic 10,538,275 0.00%
27 Hungary 9,849,000 0.00%
28 Cyprus 847,008 280,000 33.06%
Total 572,599,188 20,220,000 3.53%

The inhabitants of the Ummah see their primary loyalty as being to the Ummah and NOT to any of the geographical countries we Europeans recognise. And given that the population of the Ummah will probably double every 20 or so years while the indigenous populations of most European countries are declining, by 2050 the Ummah will soon be one of the largest countries in Europe that you may never have heard of.

This rather suggests that it will be a case of Europeans having to integrate with the followers of the Religion of Progress and Peace – as we already see happening with Sharia courts, slaughter of animals without stunning, 8-year-old girls forced to wear headscarves, Ummah children getting their education in mosques rather than schools, the criminalisation of free speech, the police and politicians covering up rapes and other crimes by members of the Ummah etc etc etc – rather than them integrating with us.

Fun times ahead?

Merkel – why are you destroying your own country?

(Wednesday/Thursday blog)

I found this short video quite poignant. It features an Iranian woman who escaped the hell that is Iran and who has been living in Germany for the last 31 years. She is married and has children and is asking Mad Adolf Merkel why she is bringing the hell that is the Religion of Peace and Progress into Germany and transforming Germany into a violent, backward Third-World country.

Was the Trump memo really a “nothingburger”?

Attached below is the best article I found describing the current spat between Trump and the US Establishment (Democrats, FBI and Department of Justice)

The four key points seem to be:

1. The FBI put together a ‘dodgy dossier’ which would have made our own Tony Blair proud. The dodgy dossier was based on work done by a British former intelligence officer and fantasist paid by the Clinton campaign and was used to persuade the DoJ to issue a wiretap warrant on a Trump adviser in the hope of proving collusion between Trump and Putin. The FBI ‘forgot’ to tell the DoJ the tainted source of their information

2. For over a week the Establishment argued that releasing a memo about collusion between the Clinton campaign and the FBI would damage US intelligence gathering and expose many US agents

3. Trump ignored these warnings and released the 4-page memo

4. As soon as the memo was released, the US Establishment did a reverse ferret and claimed there was nothing in it of any importance and that it was just a “nothingburger“. But if it was really just a “nothingburger”, why did the US Establishment fight so hard to prevent Trump releasing the memo?

Anyway, here’s the article:

The Democrats and the media spent a week lying to the American people about the “memo.” 

The memo was full of “classified information” and releasing” it would expose “our spying methods.” By “our,” they didn’t mean American spying methods. They meant Obama’s spying methods. 

A former White House Ethics Lawyer claimed that the Nunes memo would undermine “national security.” On MSNBC, Senator Chris Van Hollen threatened that if the memo is released, the FBI and DOJ “will refuse to share information with the House and Senate Intelligence Committees.” 

Senator Cory Booker howled that releasing the memo was “treasonous” and might be “revealing sources and methods” and even “endangering fellow Americans in the intelligence community.” 

The memo isn’t treasonous. It reveals a treasonous effort by the Democrats to use our intelligence agencies to rig an election and overturn the will of the voters. 

The only two “sources” 18 are Christopher Steele, who was funded by the Clinton campaign, and a Yahoo News article, that were used to obtain a FISA warrant against a Trump associate. That Yahoo story came from Michael Isikoff, the reporter who knew about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky but suppressed it. It was based on more leaks from Steele which the FBI and DOJ chose to ignore. Steele’s identity was already well known. The only new source revealed is Yahoo News

No vital intelligence sources were compromised at Yahoo News. And no Yahoo News agents were killed. 

The media spent a week lying to Americans about the dangers of the memo because it didn’t want them to find out what was inside. Today, the media and Dems switched from claiming that the memo was full of “classified information” that might get CIA agents killed to insisting that it was a dud and didn’t matter. Oh what tangled webs we weave when first we practice to deceive. 

On Thursday, the narrative was that the memo would devastate our national security and no one should ever be allowed to read it. By Friday, the new narrative was that the memo tells us nothing important and we shouldn’t even bother reading it. The lies change, but suppressing the memo remains the goal. 

Rep. Nadler, infamous for securing pardons for Weather Underground bombers, got caught between narratives when he insisted that the memo was “overhyped,” but suggested that it “endangers national security.” “I don’t think anybody will be terribly shocked by what’s in the memo,” he told CNN. 

And requested an emergency meeting of the House Judiciary Committee – a body he will head if Democrats win the mid-term elections. 

Calling emergency meetings is not the response to an “overhyped” and non-shocking memo. 

There is no legitimately classified information in the Nunes memo. But it does endanger a number of “Americans” in the “intelligence community” who colluded with the Clinton campaign against America. 

It endangers former FBI Director Comey, former Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, current Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and the current FBI General Counsel Dana Boente who had previously served as the Acting Attorney General. These men and women had allegedly signed FISA applications that were at best misleading and at worst badly tainted. 

The Clinton campaign had enlisted figures in the FBI and the DOJ to manipulate an election. The coup against America operated as a “state within a state” inside the United States government. 

“The political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials,” the memo informs us. But they did not reveal on the FISA application that their core evidence came from the Clinton campaign. Sources were certainly being protected. But they were Clinton sources. 

The memo reveals that without the Steele dossier there would have been no eavesdropping on Carter Page, the Trump associate targeted in this particular case. “Deputy Director McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that no surveillance warrant would have been sought from the FISC without the Steele dossier information.” But the FISA application neglected to mention that its primary source had been paid by the Clinton campaign, was unverified and would continue to be unverified. 

FBI Director Comey testified that he had told President Trump that the dossier was “unverified.” Yet the “unverified” piece of opposition research was used as the basis for a FISA application. 

As Rep. Jim Jordan noted, “FBI takes ‘salacious and unverified’ dossier to secret court to get secret warrant to spy on a fellow American, and FBI doesn’t tell the court that the DNC/Clinton campaign paid for that dossier. And they did that FOUR times.” 

“There’s been no evidence of a corrupt evidence to obtain warrants against people in the Trump campaign,” Rep. Adam Schiff insisted. That’s why he tried to block the release of the evidence. 

The evidence was unverified opposition research. Its source had been paid by the Clinton campaign. Not only had Steele been indirectly working for the Clinton campaign (when he wasn’t being paid by the FBI), but he made no secret of his own political agenda to stop Trump. 

“In September 2016, Steele admitted to Ohr his feelings against then-candidate Trump when Steele said he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president,” the memo informs us. 

That’s former Associate Deputy Attorney General Bruce Ohr whose wife was being paid by an organization hired by the Clinton campaign to investigate Trump. Ohr then passed along his wife’s opposition research to the FBI. The evidence couldn’t be any more corrupt than that. 

Steele was passionate about Trump “not being president.” So were his handlers who ignored his leaks to the media until he “was suspended and then terminated as an FBI source for what the FBI defines as the most serious of violations-an unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI.” His previous meetings, including the one that allegedly generated the Yahoo News article, were ignored. 

Tainted investigations are nothing new. Law enforcement is as fallible as any other profession. But the memo reveals a snapshot of just how many top figures colluded in this corrupted and tainted effort. 

What drove them to violate professional ethical norms and legal requirements in the FISA applications? 

Top DOJ and FBI officials shared Steele’s “passion,” and that of his ultimate employer, Hillary Clinton, to stop Donald Trump at all costs. And they’re still trying to use the Mueller investigation to overturn the election results in a government coup that makes Watergate look like a children’s tea party, 

Former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe is already under investigation. He’s suspected of trying to sit on the Wiener emails until the election was over. This alleged failed cover-up triggered the Comey letter which hurt Hillary worse than a timely revelation would have. McCabe’s wife had financial links to the Clintons. 

Former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates was an Obama holdover who had foolishly tried to use the DOJ to go to war with President Trump. Both Yates and Dana Boente were Obama and Holder choices. During the groundless prosecution of the former Republican governor of Virginia, Boente had declared, “No one is above the law.” We’ll see if that’s true with everyone who signed the FISA applications. 

If Boente signed false or misleading FISA applications, he should be removed as FBI General Counsel. 

The memo is only the first crack in the wall. But it’s grounds for an investigation that will expose the abuses that led to eavesdropping on Trump officials. And the motives of those who perpetuated them. 

Washington Post piece suggested that just releasing the memo alone would allow Mueller to charge President Trump with “obstruction of justice.” That’s how badly they want to get Trump. 

A clear and simple fact emerges from the memo. 

Top figures in the DOJ and the FBI, some loyal to Obama and Hillary, abused the FISA process in the hopes of influencing or reversing the results of an election by targeting their political opponents. The tool that they used for the job came from the Clinton campaign. Using America’s intelligence services to destroy and defeat a political opponent running for president is the worst possible abuse of power and an unprecedented threat to a democratic system of free open elections. 

We have been treated to frequent lectures about the independence of the DOJ and the FBI. But our country isn’t based around government institutions that are independent of oversight by elected officials. When unelected officials have more power than elected officials, that’s tyranny. 

A Justice Department that acts as the Praetorian Guard for a political campaign is committing a coup and engaging in treason. The complex ways that the Steele dossier was laundered from the Clinton campaign to a FISA application is evidence of a conspiracy by both the DOJ and the Clinton campaign. 

It’s time for us to learn about all the FISA abuses, the list of NSA unmasking requests of Trump officials by Obama officials and the eavesdropping on members of Congress. We deserve to know the truth. 

The memo has been released. Now it’s time to release everything.  

(Daniel Greenfield FrontPage Magazine)

Major butt hurt for ‘Democrats’ at Trump’s State of the Union speech

(Friday/weekend blog)

I don’t know if readers are fully aware of the utterly disgraceful behaviour of Democrat Members of Congress during Trump’s State of the Union speech a couple of days ago. The Democrats sat in disrespectful sullen silence throughout the speech. On the one occasion one Democrat did try to stand to applaud. But he quickly saw that all around him remained glued to their chairs so immediately sat down again.

Although the ‘opinion polls’ (mostly conducted by pro-Clinton media) appear to show that Trump is the most unpopular president in US history, the Democrats might just be getting a bit worried. Trump is actually getting things done and the US economy is growing with unemployment among ethnic minorities at the lowest level for several decades. While many Americans may not like Trump, they might just decide that Trump is an effective president – unlike Saint Obama who appears to have achieved less than zilch during his 8 years in the White House – and they might just (horror of horrors for the Democrats) vote for Trump again in 2020.

Anyway, here’s Paul Joseph Watson briefly explaining what a bunch of hypocritical, partisan, unpatriotic cnuts the Democrat Members of Congress are:

What a coincidence! Migrant-free Poland safest European country for women

(Wednesday/Thursday blog)

Poland (along with other East European countries) has been in the news for its absolute refusal to take in any of Merkel’s invading army of multi-cultural-enriching migrants.

By an extremely odd, and to me inexplicable, coincidence Poland has also just been ranked as the safest country in mainland Europe for women.

Every year a consultancy New World Wealth produces a report called “Global Wealth Migration Review”.

The report mainly looks at the movement of high net worth individuals (HNWI) across the world.

However, part of that analysis involves reviewing the safest countries for women as this is a way of establishing how civilised or otherwise a country is and this correlates to its likely future prosperity: “Woman safety is one of the best ways to gauge a country’s long term wealth growth potential, with a correlation of 92% between historic wealth growth and woman safety levels,” the report says. “This means that wealth growth is boosted by strong levels of woman safety in a country.”

The 10 safest countries for women in 2017 were:

  1. Australia
  2. Malta
  3. Iceland
  4. New Zealand
  5. Canada
  6. Poland
  7. Monaco
  8. Israel
  9. USA
  10. South Korea

The rankings are based on the percentage of each country’s female population that has been a victim of a serious crime over the past year.

The safest countries in each region were:

    • Europe: Malta, Poland, Monaco, Iceland.
    • Asia Pacific: Australia, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Japan, South Korea.
    • Middle East: Israel, UAE.
    • Africa: Mauritius, Botswana, Namibia.
    • Americas: USA, Canada.

The least safe countries in the world for women in 2017 include Somalia, Sudan, Iraq and Syria.

Sweden’s rush into the Third-World

As for dear old, once prosperous, once civilised, once admired Sweden:

Following its rulers’ decision to import more often violent, often inbred, often low-IQ, often illiterate, often unemployable, often parasitical, often misogynistic migrants per head of population than any other European country, rape now seems to be the most popular sport in the country:

(The blue line is the total number of sex offences)

In 2011 at least 77% of rapes in Sweden were committed by men with a foreign background (“Utlandsk bakgrund”):

For reasons that should be more than obvious, the Swedish authorities no longer report the ethnicity of people committing crimes. But I would expect that by now over 95% of crimes, particularly sex crimes, are committed by people with a foreign background.

As for Sweden’s future ‘prosperity’, I have previously shown the results of a United Nations forecast which predicts Sweden becoming a Third-World country within the foreseeable future:

 

But I suppose that Sweden’s decline and the admission of so much (IMHO) sub-human garbage is just another coincidence. To think that there is any connection between immigration and rising rape levels would be “racist” as anyone in Rapey Rotherham, especially the police, social services and councillors, could tell you.