February 2019
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728  

Should we have a statue commemorating Hitler?

(Tuesday/Wednesday blog)

I know the Religion of Peace is a religion of peace. You know the Religion of Peace is a religion of peace. Our progressive, open-minded, libtard rulers keep telling us the Religion of Peace is a religion of peace:

This is in spite of the fact that there have been more than 34,600 religiously-inspired terrorist attacks in over 60 countries since 9/11.

Also our rulers keep telling us that Islamism has nothing to do with Islam which is a moderate religion promoting peace and tolerance. But strangely, many of those who lecture us about this greatest of religions, know an awful lot less about it than those who practice and lead it:

While we’re quoting Turkish leaders, I recently (4 minutes ago) came across this quote which is attributed to Kemal Attaturk – the founder of the secular Turkish state:

Depuis plus de 500 ans, les règles et les théories d’un vieux sheikh arabe, et les interprétations abusives de générations de prêtres crasseux et ignares ont fixé, en Turquie, tous les détails de la loi civile et criminelle. Elles ont réglé la forme de la constitution, les moindres faits et gestes de la vie de chaque citoyen, sa nourriture, ses heures de veille et de sommeil, la coupe de ses vêtements, ce qu’il apprend à l’école, ses coutumes, ses habitudes et jusqu’à ses pensées les plus intimes. L’islam, cette théologie absurde d’un bédouin immoral, est un cadavre putréfié qui empoisonne nos vies.

He seems to have had fairly strong views about the role of religion in holding back his country’s development. This is presumably why he deliberately set out to separate the state from religion – a policy which is being rapidly undone by the current leader.

Anyway, here for your enlightenment and education is yet another Islamic expert who appears not to understand the peaceful nature of his great religion. In this brief clip, an Islamic researcher suggests that they should erect a statue to Hitler because of what he did to the Jews. Silly man, doesn’t he realise that the Religion of Peace is a religion of peace?

https://www.memri.org/tv/egyptian-researcher-gad-zoghby-should-erect-statue-hitler-because-did-jews-holocaust-khomeini-worse

How do you negotiate with a useless drunk like Juncker?

(Monday blog)

I don’t have any stories today, so here are a few excruciating examples of the absurd behaviour of the useless drunk who currently rules over about 500 million Europeans.

Sometimes, I feel a bit sorry for the lying, treacherous hopeless May. After all, how can you negotiate anything with a useless drunk like Juncker? And then there’s the added difficulty that Juncker is just an impotent puppet of Germany as the EU is really run by European Commission Secretary-General Martin Selmayr whose grandfather was a high-ranking Nazi officer deeply involved in the slaughter of about 20 million Russians.

Then there are further complications. Most of May’s supposed ‘negotiating team’ want to fail so they can keep Britain in the EU. That’s why they tricked May into signing up for the ghastly Irish Backstop which effectively keeps Britain as a vassal state to the EU in perpetuity. But this great plan by the UK-hating British civil servants and Eurocrats like Selmayr, Tusk and Verhofstadt may be backfiring as it has been rejected by the UK Parliament. But having backed May into a corner with the Irish Backstop, the Eurocrats have also backed themselves into a corner and cannot give ground without losing face.

Moreover, our UK-loathing Remoaner MPs are trying to undermine May’s pitifully limited negotiating position by excluding the possibility of a No-deal Brexit.

What a mess!

And there’s a final complication. The Eurocrats don’t care if a No-deal Brexit results in thousands or even tens of thousands of job losses across the EU. Their only concern is preserving their own jobs and privileges and forever expanding their great EU superstate’s power and control.

Anyway, to brighten up our Monday, here’s the man that 27 EU leaders thought was a fit person to rule over about 500 million Europeans.

Look in particular at how he treats women. If Trump had done anything remotely like Juncker, millions of howling, mouth-frothing, pussy-hat-wearing lefties would be demanding his removal. But when a worthless, drunkard, globalist puppet like Juncker sexually denigrates women, nobody says anything and our mainstream media don’t even mention the incidents.

Is Salvini the Saviour?

(weekend blog)

Somalis’ contribution to America

First I’d like to thank a reader for doing a little background research on the (IMHO) foul-mouthed, anti-semitic, ignorant, US-hating new congresswoman Ilhan Omar whom I featured in Friday’s blog.

She’s a Somali who the USA granted citizenship to when she was 14 and her family appealed for that privilege as refugees. And this is the thanks they (the US) got. She clearly got elected because so many Somali refugees gathered in the area of Minneapolis she represents, that it’s now called ‘little Mogadishu.’ Some detestable cynics claim the main activity in that area is crime, that the Somalis take to like ducks to water. It doesn’t take long to find items like this regarding their conduct: “They came to the U.S. as supposed ’refugees,’ but now it has been discovered that a number of Somali immigrants are stealing hundreds of millions in American welfare money that they are literally shipping back to Africa stuffed in suitcases. Worse, the cash is going to fund the various Islamist terror armies there.”

I have written previously about the fabulous contribution Somalis have made to our once great country. So, I’ll not go any further into this particular subject in this blog.

Is Salvini the Saviour of Europe?

In English, the Italian verb ‘salvare’ means to ‘save’.

In this short video clip, someone in the crowd where Italian Interior Minister Matteo Salvini is giving a speech calls him a “shitty murderer” for preventing boats full of migrants landing in Italy. In response, Salvini says: “A round of applause for the gentleman who has won 10 illegal (Muslim) migrants.  Give your first name, family name, fiscal code, and we will send you 20 migrants and you get to take care of them and feed them everyday.”

Along with a few East European leaders, Salvini is one of the few political leaders who dares stand up for European values and European culture against the Soros-backed globalists who want to destroy Europe by flooding our continent with often illiterate, often-uneducated, often unemployable, often violent, often criminal, Third-World garbage:

And who want to replace elected country governments with unelected, bureaucratic supra-national bodies like the corrupt, wasteful EU and the even more corrupt, wasteful UN.

Unfortunately Italy is rapidly going bankrupt as, being in Euro area, it is unable to devalue its currency to make its products more competitive. So the globalists – Merkel and Macron – will probably use Italy’s dire financial situation to destroy the Italian government and replace it with EU puppets who will do as the globalists demand.

Anyway, here’s Salvini fighting to save Italy and Europe from the Third-World invasion:

Why would a new member of Congress hate America so much?

(Friday blog)

I found the short video below interesting.

In the video newly elected member of Congress Ilhan Omar engaged in a nasty exchange with special envoy to Venezuela Elliott Abrams, accusing the diplomat of being a liar and pressing him on his involvement in the Iran-Contra affair and killings in Central America during the Reagan administration. She also appears to be accusing him of supporting genocide.

Abrams was named the special envoy to Venezuela last month, shortly after the Trump administration recognized opposition leader Juan Guaidó as the country’s legitimate president. The move came as part of an increasing effort to pressure embattled President Nicolás Maduro amid an economic and humanitarian crisis in Venezuela.

Wednesday’s contentious exchange was the latest high-profile moment for Omar, in what she has just this week, come under bipartisan scrutiny after issuing multiple tweets on Sunday that were condemned as anti-Semitic.

Abrams is a highly educated and very experienced diplomat who has served in a variety of foreign policy positions for several U.S. Presidents. He received his B.A. from Harvard College, a Masters degree in international relations from the London School of Economics, and his J.D. from Harvard Law School. During George W. Bush’s first term in office, Abrams was appointed as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director on the National Security Council for Near East and North African Affairs. In Bush’s second term, he was given the job of deputy national security adviser. Abrams first came to national prominence in the Reagan administration in the 1980s, where he was Assistant Secretary of State for Human Rights, and later Assistant Secretary for Inter-American Affairs. He is currently a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. On January 25, 2019, he was appointed by President Trump as Special Envoy on Venezuela.

I’m not sure what qualifications and experience (if any) Ms Omar has to her name.

It’s interesting how Abrams reacts with calm and dignity while the (IMHO) repulsive Ilhan Omar  spews out her loathing of the US. She is meant to be using her time to question Abrams on behalf of American voters. Instead she just uses it to insult him

Ilhan Omar seems to be typical of the violently anti-American, anti-white and anti-semitic garbage that the historically-ignorant, virtue-signalling, libtard snowflake generation have elected into the US Government. And, as far as I understand, Ms Omar has called for funding for the US Department of Homeland Security and ICE (Immigration and Customs Control) to be drastically cut. I think we can imagine why she would do that?

 

It’s not just us filthy unbeliever infidels who will be killed

(Wednesday/Thursday blog)

In my most recent blog, I featured a learned cleric from our most loveliest religion explaining that non-believers had four choices – convert, be oppressed, be enslaved or be killed. I even suggested that this cleric, who had probably studied the Koran for more than forty years, possibly knew more about his religion than British libtards desperately trying to come up with such a broad definition of Izlumophobia that free speech would be impossible.

I must apologise if this gave the impression that it was only worse than pigs and apes unbelievers who were targets for a bit of a bashing from the world’s most peacefullest religion.

For hundreds of years, a schism in Christianity left Catholics and Protestants torturing and murdering each other in quite a variety of unpleasant ways. Similarly a schism between Sunnis and Shiites has led to members of the peacefullest most tolerantest religion also slaughtering each other in fairly high numbers.

Just to illustrate, here’s a ‘heartwarming’ story from Sunni Saudi Arabia.

This is 6-year-old Zakaria Al-Jaber

Or at least this was Zakaria Al-Jaber. I imagine he doesn’t look quite the same since he was beheaded by a Sunni taxi driver.

Multiple sources provide conflicting reports regarding the details of the boy’s murder, but all are consistent in the claim that the child was beheaded using broken glass in front of his mother.

According to Shia Rights Watch, Zakaria Al-Jaber and his mother had taken a taxi to a shrine in Medina, and when they arrived an “unknown man approached them” and asked if they were Shiite Muslims.

The mother reportedly said “yes”.

Activists report that minutes after this conversation a car stopped by the woman and pulled the child away from her and attacked him with a broken piece of glass. Witnesses report that Zakaria Al-Jaber was beheaded from behind as mother watched and screamed.

Shia Rights Watch claims that no bystanders intervened. Whether this was because they were afraid of being hurt, were filming the beheading on their mobile phones or were quite pleased to see a Shiite getting murdered is not clear.

According “sources close to the family,” the perpetrator was the taxi driver who stopped the car and “forced the boy out near a coffee shop in the Al-Tilal neighborhood.” The driver then allegedly smashed a glass bottle to obtain a shard of glass, which he then used to slash the boy’s throat, and stab him.

The traumatized mother is said to have tried to stop the driver from attacking the boy but fainted.

Clearly the Saudi authorities have been learning from European leaders as they quickly issued a statement declaring that the boy’s murderer had ‘mental health issues’. Therefore, as the murderer had these ‘mental health issues’, the beheading obviously had nothing to do with any religion.

These ‘mental health issues’ really seem to be occurring ever more frequently in ever more countries.

I wonder why?

It’s not a phobia when they tell you they want to kill you!

(Monday/Tuesday blog)

New libtard definitions of Izlumophobia

Our rulers are busy making up new definitions of Izlumophobia in order to suppress any criticism of our wonderfullest, most favouritest religion.

Here’s the latest version from a few councils:

• Calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of Muslims in the name of a racist/fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.
• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
• Accusing Muslims as a group of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Muslim person or group of Muslim individuals, or even for acts committed by non-Muslims.
• Accusing Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, of inventing or exaggerating Islamophobia, ethnic cleansing or genocide perpetrated against Muslims.
Community or to their countries of origin, or to the alleged priorities of Muslims worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
• Denying Muslim populations, the right to self-determination e.g., by claiming that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is a terrorist endeavour.
• Applying double standards by requiring of Muslims behaviours that are not expected or demanded of any other groups in society, eg loyalty tests.
• Using the symbols and images associated with classic Islamophobia.
• Holding Muslims collectively responsible for the actions of any Muslim majority state, whether secular or constitutionally Islamic.

And now from someone who knows what they’re talking about

But here’s someone who probably knows more about our bestest most loved religion than those progressive libtard idiots who are trying to extend the definition of Izlumophobia to crush any semblance of free speech.

In his weekly fatwa session, which he uploads to his YouTube channel, Kuwaiti cleric Othman Al-Khamis said that apostates must be killed.  In a video uploaded on January 9, 2019, Sheikh Al-Khamis said that apostasy is tantamount to scorning Islam. In an October 14, 2015 video, Sheikh Al-Khamis said that only infidels may be enslaved, adding that people who do not worship Allah must convert to Islam, pay the jizya poll tax, be forced into slavery, or be fought against and killed.

If we’re to believe that this fine and wise cleric knows slightly more about the happiest and most peacefullest religion in the world than progressive British libtards, then it’s not a phobia when they tell you they want to forcibly convert you and, if you refuse to convert, they want to oppress you, enslave you or kill you:

https://www.memri.org/tv/kuwaiti-cleric-othman-khamis-no-feel-bad-infidels-enslaved-refuse-convert-islam-apostasy-death

Let us give thanks to our many multi-cultural enrichers

(weekend blog)

This weekend I’d like to introduce you to Hewad Shivzad. It’s just possible that the BBC and C4 News and all the other mainstream media will decide that Hewad Shivzad’s story isn’t newsworthy.

This young chap, Hewad Shivzad, is just 19 years old. Here he is:

What I mean is that he claims to be just 19 years old. Hewad Shivzad claims to be 19 years old now because, when he originally entered the UK to claim asylum in March 2017, he said he was just 17 years old. This hugely increased his chances of being granted leave to remain as a supposed ‘vulnerable child’.

You or I might be tempted to think that this fine fellow, Hewad Shivzad, looks to be at least 30. But the Home Office and immigration authorities never do medical checks on would-be child migrants to establish their real age as that would be waaaccciiissssttt. So we have to accept that Hewad Shivzad is 19 years old as he claims. This mirrors the fiasco when Britain was forced by pressure from virtue-signalling progressive libtards to take in a bunch of supposed ‘child refugees’ from Calais. Most of these ‘child refugees looked to be rather older than children:

Talking of children, let me explain the contribution multi-cultural enricher Hewad Shivzad has made to our once great country.

Hewad Shivzad isolated a primary school-age girl and lured her away to subject her to a sexual attack lasting 30 to 40 minutes. He ignored her pleas for him to stop, sexually assaulted her and forced himself on her, Teesside Crown Court heard. If the girl was of primary-school age, then she would have been anything from 5 to 11 years old at the time Hewad Shivzad decided to give her a jolly good dose of multi-cultural enrichment.

A judge said the victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was a blameless, charming, innocent and “innately kind” girl. She read out a moving statement from the girl’s mother, who said: “I’m worried that this will have ruined her life.” The mum said the rape massively affected her daughter, leading to anger, violent behaviour and harming herself. “We are really struggling as a family,” she added. “She talks about what happened all the time. I think that she’s depressed. I really need some help for her.”

Hewad Shivzad has been sent to prison. But he’ll probably serve half or less of his supposed 15-year sentence and be out on the streets again in about 7 years or less. As far as I understand, there has been no mention of deporting him when he is released even though he clearly lied about his age to stay in Britain and even though he raped a child of primary-school age.

In his life in Britain, Hewad Shivzad will probably damage many more innocent lives and probably cost us millions of pounds in benefits and policing and prison costs. Yet nobody has considered throwing him out of our country. After all, as the progressive media and the brain-dead, virtue-signalling snowflakes produced by our failing learn-nothing schools and safe-space universities keep telling us:

Though the parents of tens of thousands of raped and abused girls might not agree with the progressive libtards that the Third-World detritus our rulers are so enthusiastically importing to turn our boring, white monocultural country into a thriving, diverse multi-cultural paradise are quite as harmless as the virtue-signalling elites claim.

I had always thought that the primary duty of any government is to protect its own people. It is not to give a life of luxury, with almost unlimited money and sex, to every piece of parasitic, pig-ignorant, illiterate, low-IQ, unemployable, deeply criminal, rape-obsessed Third-World sh*t who decides to come here.

It’s clear from Hewad Shivzad’s story and thousands of similar cases that our government has failed in this most basic duty.

Finally a comedy sketch that makes fun of progressive liberals

(Thursday/Friday blog)

For years supposed ‘comedians’ on the BBC and other channels have ‘entertained’ us by mocking anyone with views that aren’t leftist, progressive, virtue-signalling, rapemigrant-hugging and politically correct.

But finally a comedy sketch has emerged that dares ridicule the progressive, lefty, #metoo, snowflake idiots who have turned our democracy into an idiocracy.

The sketch isn’t great but it’s at least a small glimpse of hope as we descend into sheep-like snowflake madness:

“Self-inflicted” – the adjective the mainstream media never use

(Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday blog)

I want you to imagine the population of the UK doubling every 20 years. Officially there are just over 66 million people living in the UK. But if you include all the unregistered illegal immigrants, the real figure is probably comfortably over 70 million. However, for the purposes of this exercise, let’s accept the official 66 million figure.

So, if the UK population doubled every 20 years we’d have about 132 million people by 2040 and around 264 million by 2060. It should be more than blindingly obvious to anyone except a progressive, liberal, rapefugee-hugging moron that such population growth would be utterly disastrous. There would be mass unemployment, widespread poverty, most people would be living in overcrowded slums and there would be constant civil war as different ethnic groups fought over limited resources of food, water and space, while the rich would retreat into well-guarded, fortress-like compounds. Britain with 264 million people (or even 132 million) would be a dystopia that would make Soylent Green look like girl guides’ picnic.

Fortunately, Britain’s population is not doubling every 20 years. But the population of Crapistan is;

In fact, the population of practically every Asian and African sh*thole is doubling every 20 or so years:

When writing about poverty and famine and floods and earthquakes and suchlike, the one word the media never use is “self-inflicted”. Africa is NOT poor. Africa is one of the richest continents in the world. Africa has massive resources of land, water and minerals. But most Africans live in abject poverty. Why? Because there are too many of them and because their populations are growing much faster than their economies.

“Help” scream Oxfam and Save the Children and Unicef’s well-paid bosses and kiddy-fiddling staff, “give us more money to help the poor Africans”. After World War II under the Marshall Plan, Europe received about $20 billion (in today’s money) over 5 years to aid rebuilding. Since massive aid started flowing into Africa in the mid 1960s, Africa has received about $20 billion (in today’s money) every 5 years – equivalent to ten Marshall Plans. The result – more Africans live in excremental cesspit poverty than they did before the huge flows of foreign aid started.

What about famines?

“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about famines? We need to help people affected by famines“. Rubbish. For example, there is a lack of rainfall in the Horn of Africa every 7 to 10 years. This is completely predictable and could be planned for. But it could only be planned for if Ethiopia and Somalia and Sudan etc had growing economies that could support their people. But all these sh*tholes have are rapidly growing populations that no reasonable amount of foreign aid can ever adequately feed, clothe and house. As I keep repeating, in 1964 or whenever it was that Saint Bob did his BandAid thingy, there were about 40 million Ethiopians, now there are about 100 million. And by 2040 there will be about 200 million. How are you going to find jobs, homes and food for all of those people?

What about floods?

“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about floods? We need to help people affected by floods”. Rubbish. The main reason there are often devastating floods in the usual Third-World sh*tholes is due to excessive population growth. This leads to deforestation so that, when the rains do come, they are not absorbed into the ground through the trees but instead turn into deadly torrents causing landslides and loss of life. When it was thought London might be flooded, the Thames Barrier was built between 1974 and 1984. Most floods can be avoided if a country has the resources and money.

What about civil war?

“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about civil war? We need to help people affected by civil wars”. Rubbish. Most civil wars start when there are too many people fighting over too few resources – land, food, water etc. If there were fewer people and thus more resources available for each person, probably most civil wars wouldn’t happen.

It’s population control we need, not aid!

As long as sh*thole countries double their populations every 20 or so years we will have misery, poverty, war and other disasters. This misery is mostly self-inflicted! But this is something the useless, biased, ever so progressive mainstream media will never admit.

In the last 30 years, with their one-child policy, the Chinese have managed to take over 600 million people out of poverty. In the last 30 years, due to their explosive population growth, our friends in Africa have managed to push another 600 million people into poverty

We need to stop giving foreign aid and charity to these countries with rapidly-growing populations. All we’re doing is encouraging yet more unsustainable population growth. Instead we need to set conditions on all foreign aid and charity money – that only countries with active birth control programmes will receive our help.

But we can’t do this as we would be accused of “neo-colonialism” and “neo-imperialism” and, of course, the old favourite “racism”.

So, we can’t stop Africa’s and all the Sh*tistans’ population explosion. In fact, through foreign aid and charities, we’re actually encouraging it. And when their failed sh*thole countries inevitably collapse, millions of these people will flood into Europe, overwhelm us and destroy what’s left of our civilisation:

Cowardly Finns tell migrants “ota raiskata tyttäremme”

(weekend blog)

On Thursday/Friday, I featured an article from the Gatestone Institute about how migrant grooming/rape gangs had started ‘doing a Rotherham’ in the Finnish town of Oulu. Part of the article I didn’t include went on to discuss why local politicians and the authorities were denying there was a problem and were refusing to take any action, just as Rotherham’s councillors, police and social services also all looked the other way while large gangs of our multi-cultural friends were enthusiastically enriching Rotherham’s underage girls using all the orifices they could find.

But perhaps I’m being unfair to the Finnish authorities. In some towns they seem to be making great efforts to integrate new arrivals. Here are some nice photos successful integration:

And here’s another:

And here’s another:

And here’s a small compilation:

There are plenty more similar photos from Finland available on the Internet.

What kind of parent would allow their young daughters to hang out with much older, migrant men from Africa and the Middle East? Only cowardly, libtard Finns brainwashed by political correctness into believing all cultures are equal when Western European culture is clearly vastly superior to the cultures of the self-inflicted sh*thole countries most of these migrants come from.

Oh, and by the way, the “ota raiskata tyttäremme” in the title of this weekend’s blog means “please rape our daughters” which seems to be the attitude of Finnish politicians, police and social services just as it was in Rotherham, Oxford, Newcastle, Bradford and so many other English towns.