August 2018
« Jul    

Overpopulation and corruption kill! Monsoons don’t! Ebola doesn’t! Famines don’t!

(weekend blog)

Was it the monsoon wot did it?

Here we go again. It’s monsoon season and there are floods – floods of water pouring down the hills and floods of tears as the BBC and C4 News interview survivors whose family members have supposedly been “killed by the monsoon”. And, of course, the rising number of deaths each year are used as proof of Global Warming or Climate Change or whatever it’s called this week.

I’m not unsympathetic. But I don’t believe anyone was killed by the monsoon. Population growth in India is completely out of control. There are over 1,250,000,000 Indians and that number is increasing by about 15 million a year:

India is full and getting fuller by the day:

Moreover, corruption is everywhere in India. Thus the need to house India’s ever-growing population leads to massive illegal deforestation and illegal building.

So, when it rains, what happens? Unable to soak into the ground, the monsoon rains form into floods which destroy homes and lives. But what is really doing the killing – the rain or the overpopulation and the corruption which have led to the monsoons becoming ever more deadly?

I suspect it’s the overpopulation and the corruption.

Can I prove this? No. But here are some things I can prove:

Ebola deaths caused by corruption?

Remember the 2014 Ebola outbreak? Remember how we were all asked by the charities to give generously? Remember how British health workers risked their lives going to Africa to help treat the ebola victims? But there’s one crucial fact you probably don’t remember because nobody told you. In 2013, about €60m of EU taxpayers’ money (including British aid money) was donated to Liberia to build clinics and train health workers. Of this €60m, about €3m actually reached the Liberian Ministry of Health. As for the other €57m, that was stolen by corrupt Liberian politicians and bureaucrats.

Liberia was the African country with the highest death rate from ebola partly due to a lack of clinics and health workers.

Tsunami deaths caused by corruption?

Or how about the 2004 disastrous Asian tsunami? Once again, we all generously donated money to help the poor victims. We were so generous that many corrupt Asian politicians and bureaucrats must have thought it was Christmas. For example, in utterly venal Sri Lanka corrupt customs officers impounded vehicles and medical supplies we sent to help Sri Lanka’s 516,000 displaced tsunami victims and the families of the 35,000 who died. The customs officers and their political bosses would only release the vehicles and medical supplies in return for an immediate payment of $1m in cash bribes and a further $2m, also in cash.

As for the 35,000 who did actually die, were they killed by the tsunami or by the fact that their houses were just shacks because they lived in poverty while their rulers became billionaires?

Does malaria really kill?

Or let’s go to Cambodia. In 2013, about $20m was given in aid to buy mosquito nets for poorer families. Of this $20m, about $3m was paid in bribes to officials at the country’s National Malaria Centre. The other $17m was wasted because the corrupt businessmen given the contracts to produce the nets made more profit by not treating the nest with insecticide and so the original nets had to be scrapped and replaced using even more aid money.

Oh look, it’s another Ethiopian famine! Quelle surprise!

Now let’s go the the biggest basket case of all – Ethiopia

There’s a famine in the Horn of Africa (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan etc) ever 7 to 10 years due to a lack of rain and ensuing crop failures. That’s why, for the last 60+ years we’ve been pouring our aid money into these countries.

Yet things never seem to get better. I wonder why not.

Here’s a clue – the population of Ethiopia was around 40 million when Saint Bob Geldorf did his BandAid thingy. It’s now close to 100 million:

So, if Ethiopia couldn’t feed 40 million 34 years ago, how is it meant to feed about 100 million now and then about 200 million by 2040?

As for corruption, according to Transparency International Ethiopia’s elites loot over $2bn a year from their supposedly ‘poor’ country. And I believe that Ethiopia’s top ten families are worth around $24bn+. If Ethiopia wasn’t so totally corrupt, it could afford to provide water and food and hospitals and roads and education and electricity for its own people and wouldn’t need any of our aid.

It’s Christmas every day for Africa’s rulers

And for any newer readers who haven’t seen it, here’s a video a reader made for me about what really happens with our foreign aid billions:

Gang of white British men charged with sexual exploitation of M*slim girls in Huddersfield

(Friday blog)

It’s OK, relax. The headline is ‘fake news’. I was only joking.

Of course, I know there are plenty of white male rapists. Moreover, it’s probably difficult to find a Catholic priest who isn’t a lifelong, Olympic-level kiddy-fiddler. But white British men tend not to indulge in decades of industrial scale gang-rape, gang-sodomisation, gang-torture and gang-trafficking of underage girls (encouraged by the local police and social workers and Labour politicians in the name of multi-culturalism).

And, of course, the girls being abused and gang-raped and gang-sodomised and beaten and sold for sex tend not to come from the Moozerlum community.

Anyway, are there any white British men left in Huddersfield? Or is the whole town now a Third-World paradise?

But looking at the mainstream media headlines, you’d have had trouble identifying which particular community the Huddersfield rapists came from.

Here’s what Sky News reported: “West Yorkshire police charge 31 people in child sex inquiry”. Though Sky News went on to claim the abused were “women aged 12-18”. Ooops, I thought females aged 12 to 18 were ‘girls’ not ‘women’.

The Daily Mail also decided to not mention the ethnic origin of the perpetrators: “Thirty men and a woman charged for sexual exploitation of girls as young as 12”. Though at least the Daily Mail didn’t claim the abused were “women”.

And so it goes on. I couldn’t find any mainstream media even mentioning that the men were “Asian”. No, this time they were just “people” or “men”. It seems that, given all the previous reports of “Asian” men indulging in their national sport with white girls, the mainstream media have now been instructed by those on high to no longer even mention the word “Asian”.

So who are these men? And which community do they come from?

I just don’t know. Do you?

Wait, I’ve got an idea. Perhaps their names might give us a clue?

According to one article I read, West Yorkshire Police said the accused include:

  • Banaras Hussain, 37, of Shipley, charged with one count of rape of a female over 16.
  • Banaris Hussain, 35, of Huddersfield, charged with one count of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Mohammed Suhail Arif, 30, of Huddersfield, charged with rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Iftikar Ali, 37, of Huddersfield, charged with attempted rape of a girl aged 13-15 and three counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Mohammed Sajjad, 31, of Huddersfield, charged with four counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15, one rape of a girl under 13 and facilitating the commission of a child sex offence.
  • Fehreen Rafiq, 38, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of facilitating the commission of a child sex offence.
  • Umar Zaman, 30, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Basharat Hussain, 31, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Amin Ali Choli, 36, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of rape of a female over 16.
  • Shaqeel Hussain, 35, of Dewsbury, charged with rape of a girl aged 13-15 and two counts of trafficking.
  • Mubasher Hussain, 35, of Huddersfield, charged with rape of a girl aged 13-15 and sexual assault
  • Abdul Majid, 34, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Mohammed Dogar, 35, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of facilitating the commission of child sex offence.
  • Usman Ali, 32, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Mohammed Waqas Anwar, 29, of Huddersfield, charged with five counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Gul Riaz, 42, of Huddersfield, charged with rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Mohammed Akram, 41, of Huddersfield, charged with two counts of trafficking with a view to sexual exploitation of a female and rape of a girl aged 14-15.
  • Manzoor Akhtar, 29, of Huddersfield, charged with trafficking and three counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15.
  • Samuel Fikru, 30, of Camden, charged with two counts of rape of a girl aged 13-15

From looking at the names, I’m getting the feeling that most of the accused actually are what our media used to refer to as “Asians” but what the rest of us might call………………… (Censored due to political correctness).

Oh, and here are some other men from no particular community or cultural group who have reportedly been caught having fun with rather young “women” (as Sky News would probably call 10 to 15 year-old girls)


Meanwhile from those total turkeys in Turkey

A great story from the idiots in Turkey. Given the current spat between the US and Turkey, those clever Turks are demonstrating their patriotism by taking their iphones, which they’ve already paid for, and smashing them with hammers or shooting bullets through them. Duh, I’m sure Apple will be devastated, especially when things cool down and the dumb-ass Turks have to go out and buy new replacement iphones.

But will these lame-brained, zero-IQ Turkish d*ckheads also stop using computers with Microsoft, stop flying on planes made by Boeing and stop using FaceBook and Instagram and YouTube and other US Internet companies where they post videos of themselves destroying American products they’re already bought?

Good grief – human stupidity seems to have no limits!

Miguel’s retirement plan vs M’hammed’s retirement plan

(Thursday blog)

The lunacy of our lame-brained leaders

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) run by wrinkled French prune, Christine Lagarde, has just issued a new report on Spain’s economic future:

According to the wrinkled Froggy prune Lagarde’s great organisation, Spain must open its borders to more than five million migrants over the coming decades in order to fund its pension system due to Spain’s ageing population.

This claim comes despite data that shows 3.5 million Spaniards are presently unable to find work, and that the country’s youth unemployment rate is stuck at 34 per cent. Even though Spain already has that huge wealth of untapped human potential suffering from unemployment, the IMF insisted that mass migration is the solution, by “increas[ing] the number of contributors to the pension system”.

Why is this new report important?

Because our globalist rulers are making the same ludicrous claim about all Western European countries. Because it was this type of thinking which led Adolf Merkel to open Germany’s borders to over a million invaders. Because it shows the utter stupidity of our lame-brained leaders.

So, let’s briefly analyse just 3 reasons why the pro-migration elites are so totally misguided:

1. Artificial intelligence

At the same time as our rulers are lecturing us about the need to tear down our borders and let Africa and the Middle East in, we’re also being warned about how artificial intelligence will destroy many traditional jobs and lead to mass unemployment in the West.

It is clear that increasing mechanisation of tasks reduces the need for workers. So we’ll be hard-pressed to find jobs for our own citizens.

Thus, we have absolutely no need for migrant hordes from Third-World shit-holes

2. IQ, skills and employability

Here they are – the Europeans of the future:

Apparently these are the doctors, engineers and computer scientists who will save Western Europe’s ageing population from economic collapse.

At least that’s what Adolf Merkel and French prune Lagarde and George Soros and the libtard BBC and C4 News and others of their ilk claim we pig-ignorant plebs should see in these pictures:

However, a misanthropic cynic might see an invading army of low-IQ, illiterate, violent, uneducated, unemployable human detritus who have ruined their own countries through their own stupidity and are now coming to ruin our countries turning Europe from an advanced civilisation into just another Third-World shit-hole:


3. Miguel’s retirement plan vs M’hammed’s retirement plan

But the biggest flaw in the Froggy prune’s ‘brilliant’ report is that most of the Third-World invaders have absolutely no intention of spending their lives working to pay taxes to support the retirement of ageing Europeans.

Our lamebrained leaders envisage a golden future where Miguel and Fritz and Luigi and Costas and Soren will enjoy comfortable retirements paid for by the hard work and taxes of M’hammed and Abdul and Ali and Hamza.

However, M’hammed and Abdul and Ali and Hamza have quite different plans. They plan to get into Europe, have multiple wives, produce as many mini-Jihadis as possible and then live comfortably on benefits of up to €100,000 a year for the rest of their lives with free schooling for their mini-Jihadis, free housing, free healthcare, free everything while supplementing their income from crime and getting their entertainment from ….well… know what……..

So, there’s a more than slight problem here – Miguel and M’hammed both plan to live comfortably from the hard work and taxes of the other.

Oooops, it seems as if our rulers haven’t thought about how deal with this not inconsiderable contradiction.


Meanwhile, back in Britain – it’s A’Level results day

Today over 200,000 school-leavers will decide to waste £60,000 each on useless degrees that won’t lead to graduate jobs.

Today school-leavers get their A’level results. Around 500,000 of them will be celebrating and heading off to university in September.
But should so many really bother going to university? At around £60,000 in tuition fees and living costs a Uni degree will be the second most expensive thing these school-leavers and their families will ever buy. However for at least 200,000 of them, their degree will not lead to a graduate job and a graduate salary and yet will burden them with unrepayable debt for most of their working lives.
My latest book THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON exposes how many universities have gone from being centres of academic excellence to becoming large corporate, profit-obsessed businesses with overpaid chief executives intent on cramming in as many tuition-fees-paying students as possible regardless of whether students will benefit from their degrees and be able to get graduate jobs. On many courses, less than one in ten graduates will get graduate jobs.

Lefties quickly change their tune on the burqa!

(Wednesday blog)

The Westminster car crash

I suppose I should mention what the BBC is still calling the “Westminster crash”. It’s wonderful how the BBC still maintains it was a “crash” in spite of the fact that the driver drove around London for over half an hour looking for a decent-sized crowd to drive into.

As for the crasher, he’s a Sudanese (Moozerlum?) gentleman living in a multi-cultural, diverse, colourful area of Birmingham – a UK city where white ethnic Brits (as I highlighted in my blog yesterday) are in a minority.

Here’s the crasher:

Quite clearly the crasher will be found to be suffering from psychological problems. I’m sure we all wish him well with his recovery.

And, by the way, Mr Crasher, if you want to kill lots of stinking, ungodly infidels, you’ll need a nice big “truck of peace” like your chums used in Nice and Berlin and not a tiny secondhand Ford Fiesta:


Burqa babes – the lefties’ hypocrisy

The Establishment is howling with manufactured outrage at Boris Johnson’s burqa comments. As for the lefties, they’re foaming at the mouth and screaming for supposedly “racist”, “Izlumophobic” Johnson to be sacked. So this might be a good time to remind ourselves what a few prominent, (IMHO) sickeningly hypocritical lefties have said about burqa babes in the past.

Let’s start with the (IMHO) blubbery botty-bothering lefty luvvie and national treasure Sir Stephen Fry. Here he is on Have I got News For You making fun of a burqa babe saying what sounds like “I just posted a letter in something like that”:

Ooops. Mr Fry is apparently saying that a babe in a burqa looks like a letter-box. But I don’t remember the howls of lefty outrage. I don’t remember the self-righteous, holier-than-thou libtards screaming for the blubbery botty-botherer to be banned from our TV screens.

Then the other members of the programme also make their supposedly ‘humorous’ comments about the burqa babe. Again no lefty protests about those either. But when Boris merely repeats what Lord Stephen Fry says, there is widespread outrage. Odd that, isn’t it?

Or we could take lefty opinion-leader and Guardian columnist Polly Toynbee. Here’s what she wrote about the burqa in 2001 “The top-to-toe burka, with its sinister, airless little grille, is more than an instrument of persecution, it is a public tarring and feathering of female sexuality. It transforms any woman into an object of defilement too untouchably disgusting to be seen. It is a garment of lurid sexual suggestiveness: what rampant desire and desirability lurks and leers beneath its dark mysteries? In its objectifying of women, it turns them into cowering creatures demanding and expecting violence and victimisation. Forget cultural sensibilities.”

Or even the lovely, fragrant Cherie Blair in 2007: “if you get to a stage where a woman is not able to express her personality because you can’t see her face, then you do start to have to ask whether this is something that is actually acknowledging the woman’s right to be a person in her own right.”

I could go on, but I imagine readers now get the picture – the lefties seem to have done a stunning reverse ferret on the burqa. Until Boris made his comments, the lefties ridiculed the burqa and claimed it was an instrument for the oppression of women. But since Boris spoke, the lefties now claim the burqa is “practcal”, a symbol of freedom and empowerment and liberation of women and something we should welcome in a liberal open society etc etc etc blah blah blah.

Here’s the inimitable Paul Joseph Watson from 2017 ridiculing a BBC programme which tried to show the lefties’ new position on the burqa – how wonderful the burqa is.

Lefties – don’t they make you sick!!!!!!!!

Those silly billies in America don’t understand the joys of multi-culturalism

(Tuesday blog)


I’m going to be busy for the next month as I have to send around 150 emails a day trying to push up sales of my latest book THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON. (I expect to sell only about 2-3 books for every 100 emails sent, so it’s a bit of an uphill struggle).

So I was planning on stopping this blog.

But every time I decide to stop writing my blog because readers won’t show their support by buying copies of my latest book, a couple of readers make donations to my site and a couple of others tell me they’ve bought all my books and then I feel obliged to carry on with my daily drivelling in spite of the fact that 99.5% of readers refuse to show any support.

It’s not fair!

I don’t need your money. I only get £0.45 for every book sold. What I need is to sell just 5 or 6 copies a day as that would push my book up to being the top-seller in “Education” on Amazon and thus bring it to the attention of people interested in the subject.

Oh, by the way, I should be briefly on Radio Surrey/Sussex at around 10.10 this morning.

Sweden – going, going…….

There were organised riots in Sweden last night when apparently gangs of “dark-skinned” youths set fire to over 90 cars in eight different locations:

This rioting follows an attack on a police station that was being built in a heavily migrant area of the Swedish city of Gothenberg.

Perhaps they were just showing their gratitude to the Swedish people for providing them with homes, money and loads of lovely blondes to molest?

Silly billy Americans don’t understand the joys of multi-culturalism

Here’s a shortish video made by some very very stupid American people. They’re so stupid. Really really stupid. They simply don’t seem to understand all the benefits open borders and uncontrolled immigration and multi-culturalism and diversity have brought to once great Britain.

How can anyone be so very very silly?

Thankfully we have the libtard BBC and C4 News to tell us daily how fantastic open borders and uncontrolled immigration and multi-culturalism and diversity have been for our once great country. I believe the BBC is even running a series of programmes called something like “The Great Asian Summer”.

Well done, BBC. Thank you, BBC. Thank you for giving us real news, not like the biased fake news in the video below!

What use is a university degree in Total Bollox?

(Sunday/Monday blog)

More wonderful news from that bastion of Christian civilisation and common sense – Hungary.

Last week, Hungary’s government stopped universities from offering courses in Gender Studies, saying there is no need for graduates in the labor market and they take taxpayer money away from other programs.

In a statement, Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs said that there is “no demonstrable demand for graduates of ‘social gender studies’ in the Hungarian labor market. There is no economic rationale for studies such as these, and so we have reason to presume that it was not created in response to labor market needs, and equally not to furnish students with skills that can be readily and directly converted on the labor market”. 

Kovacs went on to say that such programs “take valuable resources away from other programs, and deteriorate the economic stability of universities. State universities operated from public funds must take this into consideration as the purpose of these higher education institutions is to meet genuine social and labour market needs”.

Can you imagine any British government having the courage to take on the liberal, lefty, progressive, virtue-signalling libtard establishment by doing something equally sensible? In Britain, if you get just one grade E at A Level, then you can study something utterly useless like Gender Studies at a new university and be entitled to around £50,000 in student loans for tuition and living expenses that you’ll never have to pay back as you’ll never earn enough to repay them.

After reading about what has happened in sensible Hungary, I Googled ‘Gender Studies’ in UK universities and found at least 64 MA courses in “Gender Studies and Sexuality”. But why would anyone spend three years and up to £60,000 getting a degree in Total Bollox (sorry, I meant “Gender Studies and Sexuality”)? Well, here’s one explanation I found on a university studies portal:

Gender & sexuality studies is a multi-disciplinary field dealing with the various social and cultural aspects of men and women. Sub-disciplines include women’s studies, feminism, men’s studies and LGBT studies. Masters and Bachelors in Gender & Sexuality analyse themes related to broad fields of interest such as literature, language, history, politics, sociology, law, and medicine.

Useful stuff, huh? And here’s another:

Bachelor’s or a Master’s degree in Gender & Sexuality Studies give you the insights and knowledge to educate the world against prejudice (new or old), and pretty much win every argument against obnoxious creeps. As a subdiscipline of Social Sciences, Gender & Sexuality Studies teaches you the historic, social, and cultural views of gender representation.

Why is femininity associated with soft words and shy glances? Why are men expected to be strong and powerful, always aspiring to become a CEO or a president? By studying Gender & Sexuality, you will learn how to challenge old concepts and invest in new ones, modernising mentalities and approaches. Graduates can be expected to find work in various fields, all ranging from:

• Teaching
• Health and Welfare
• Political or Public Policy-Making
• Media Writing and Advertising
• Management of Private and Public Enterprises

I’m seldom speechless, but reading this total bollox I really can’t find anything intelligent to say.

Can you?

As for the claim that Gender Studies can be an entry into all sorts of interesting and important jobs – I find that ever so slightly implausible:

Though, I stand to be corrected. Perhaps it’s just me who is out of touch. After all, in today’s politically-correct Britain, perhaps people with degrees in Utter and Total Bollox can always find well-paid (but totally unnecessary?) jobs, especially at the BBC and in the public sector? Maybe it will soon even be compulsory, in the interests of diversity, for all organisations in Britain to have someone in senior management with a degree in Total and Utter Bollox?


A reader has just contacted me telling me that I’m wasting my time trying to get my readers to buy my latest book THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON.

He’s probably right. So, I’ll stop wasting my time and yours.


(as for the reader who made a small contribution to the running costs of this site a couple of weeks ago, I’ll be contacting you to return your money)

Tourists – don’t go to Sadiq Khan’s London! It’s too dangerous!

(weekend blog)

Is your home really insured?

First a warning: Sitting in my bank for over two hours while they tried (not too hard) to find some money that had gone walkabout, I started flicking through a local estate agent’s magazine. I came across one article on home insurance. In it the writer claimed that, when you left your home unoccupied (even for a few minutes), unless all doors and windows were locked and unless all keys from the inside of doors and windows were removed then, if you had a burglary, your insurance company would refuse to cover you. Apparently, in the small print of many home insurance policies is an obligation on the homeowner to lock and remove the keys from the inside of all doors and windows.

If this article is right then, given that many people will often leave an upstairs window open when they are out and given that many people leave the keys on the inside of locked doors and windows, this means that many of us aren’t actually insured even though we think we are.

Perhaps you should check this with your home insurer?

Tourists – don’t go to Sadiq Khan’s London!

Now that only one in three  ‘Londoners’ is actually white British, London’s multi-cultural-enriching mayor, Sadiq Khan, can be sure that he’ll be re-elected time after time after time. In fact, given London’s demographics, it was an incredible achievement that former mayor Boris Johnson managed to get elected twice.

And now with Mayor Khan firmly and lucratively ensconced in the mayor’s office, lucky Londoners are benefiting from Mayor Khan’s ever so sympathetic approach to members from London’s multi-cultural-enriching communities – crime is soaring!

One of the most popular crimes at the moment seems to be moped crime – robberies and acid attacks:

I believe that now a mobile phone is stolen in London every five minutes. So you can hardly claim our multi-cultural communities aren’t hard-working. That’s a lot of phones to steal. And, even if you don’t have your phone stolen, someone will probably stab you now that most ‘Londoners’ seem to carry knives:

So, what are the police doing? Well, not much actually. Here are London’s two intrepid crime fighters:

Impressive, huh?

Under their brilliant leadership an amazing 3% of moped crimes are solved. So, the message to moped robbers is “hey guys, with Khan and Dickless in charge, you’ve got a 97% chance of getting away with your crimes”.

Though this is hardly surprising when ordinary police aren’t allowed to chase moped criminals in case the moped criminals’ human rights are affected by them getting hurt falling off or crashing their mopeds. And, of course, in the incredibly unlikely event of moped criminals being caught, the courts will let them off anyway. After all, persecuting someone like Tommy Robinson is much more important to our police and judges than dealing with real criminals.

Or perhaps London’s police are too busy attending Gay Pride marches encouraging Mayor Khan’s beloved ‘diversity’ to do any real policing?

A cynic might be tempted to conclude:

And here, for anyone who hasn’t yet seen it, is my own personal tribute to Cressida Dickhead:

It’s time to learn a new expression – “pathological altruism”

(Friday blog)

Hell has open borders

First, here’s sign seen outside a church in America:

I wonder if this sign is trying to tell us something?

Welcome to “pathological altruism”

Here are some wonderful people demonstrating for ‘open borders’:

They want 300 million or 400 million or perhaps 500 million or maybe even a billion or two probably violent, probably low-IQ, mostly illiterate, mostly unemployable, mostly West-hating Third-Worlders to be allowed to come to the West and destroy our countries, cultures and civilisation

Why would anyone be so stupid? Why would anyone be so utterly and suicidally stupid?

Here’s Paul Joseph Watson explaining a new disease that has infected the progressive, liberal, virtue-signalling, holier-than-thou elites, the mainstream media and their useful idiots on the left and among our braindead snowflake youth with their worthless university degrees in social justice and feminism and sexual politics and equality etc etc

The new disease is called “pathological altruism”.

Unless we can find a cure for “pathological altruism” the West will be destroyed. I suspect the only possible cure for “pathological altruism” might be a heavy dose of reality.

But by then it might be too late?

Hey, Lammy and Warsi and C4 and BBC! Where’s your outrage?

(Thursday blog)

The (IMHO) liberal, progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, attention-seeking elites have been desperately crawling over each other in order to prove who is the most outraged over Boris Johnson’s rather benign but accurate comparison of letter-boxes and burkha babes. Johnson should apologise! Johnson should resign! Johnson should be thrown out of the Tory Party! Johnson should be prosecuted!  Johnson should be hung, drawn and quartered! And so on and so forth.

The winners in this appalling “I’m more outraged than you” competition seem to be MP David Lammy and Baroness Warsi.

But, Lammy and Warsi, what about being outraged over these three guys?

Yesterday in Brighton, the botty-bothering (I hope that’s politically correct) capital of Britain, these three apparent multi-cultural enrichers attacked two gay men and hospitalised them breaking the jaw of one of the shirt-lifters (I hope that’s politically correct). Are Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over this violent homophobic attack? If so, I must have missed it.

And then we have the Rotherham ‘Asian’ rapists and the Rochdale ‘Asian’ rapists and the Oxford ‘Asian’ rapists and the many other towns’ ‘Asian’ rapists:

Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over 50,000+ white, usually underage British girls being raped and sodomised and beaten and tortured over at least fifteen years? If so, I must have missed it. Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over the fact that not a single policeperson or social worker or anyone else in the Establishment has been held to account for 50,000+ ‘Asian’ rapes of mostly underage white girls? If so, I must have missed it.

Here are some Christians being beheaded for being Christians:

To me this seems a bit more serious than Boris’s letter-box comments. Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over this beheading? If so, I must have missed it.

And here’s a Christian being crucified:

Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over this crucifixion? If so, I must have missed it.

In fact, just two days ago a man in Saudi Arabia (I think he was a Bangladeshi) was executed by crucifixion. Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged? If so, I must have missed it.

And, just to remind us of Boris Johnson’s supposed ‘hate crime’, once again here’s a man posting a letter in a letter box:

Rather humorous, I thought. Though, of course, in politically-correct Britain, humour is now a ‘hate crime’.

So, don’t believe the professionally outraged desperately trying to destroy Boris Johnson.

Their selective outrage and hypocrisy are more than nauseating.

And here, from the good old days when humour was permitted, is a short sketch where Harry and Paul meet a burkha beauty:

Scrotland – where the men are women and the women are men?

(Wednesday blog)

We should have known. After all, the signs were there for hundreds of years – Scrottish men dressing up in women’s clothing:

(Still, at least they’re not dressing up as letter-boxes)

And now we’re told that children in Scrotland are set to be told that “your gender is what you decide” from their first year at primary school under draft education guidelines.

Drawn up by the left-liberal Scottish National Party (SNP) government, Education Scotland, and regional National Health Service (NHS) boards, the guidelines will be part of a teaching resource to be used in Relationships, Sexual Health, and Parenthood lessons, which schools must provide as a “core” subject from early years alongside literacy and numeracy.

Teachers will be told to highlight the importance of challenging gender stereotypes in classes under the new guidelines, according to the Scotsman newspaper, which said the changes will come into effect next year.

The newspaper reports that the guidelines instruct teachers to tell children as young as five: “Your sex is what you are told by a doctor when you are born. Most people are told they are a male child (a boy) or a female child (a girl). Your gender is what you decide,” the draft guidelines then assert, adding: “People might think they know your gender because of the clothes you wear or the things you like to do. You are a unique person, you know who you are.”

A spokesman (sorry, I meant ‘spokesperson’) for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, which commissioned the new resource on behalf of a number of other agencies, said it was “still in its early early stages” but “will cover issues that young people themselves have told us are important to them such as consent, healthy relationships, emotions and feelings as well as LGBTI issues”.

The spokesperson added: “It is important that the advice and learning young people receive is relevant to its time and provides them with the knowledge and skills to help keep them safe and make the right decisions for themselves.”

“Scrotland values tolerance, Scrotland values diversity, Scrotland values respect, and above all, Scrotland values love.”
The SNP regularly boasts that Scotland is “leading the world” with regards to LGBT lobby-approved social policy, with first minister Nicola Sturgeon having led the nation’s biggest Pride parade last month.
And here is a picture that Scrottish children will no doubt be shown as part of their sex education:
Is Scrotland actually leading the world in stupidity?