December 2018
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Why is France’s most famous granny-grabber so loathed?

(weekend blog)

As our beloved treacherous Theresa looks like she’ll (hopefully) get the sack next week, things aren’t looking so great for the Emperor of Arrogance over in France either. It’s almost as if people are fed up of being lied to, belittled, insulted and betrayed by the arrogant, dishonest, self-serving, democracy-hating, globalist ruling elites.

Surrender our country! Resistance is futile!

(Thursday/Friday blog)

Resistance is futile

Ever more countries have decided to boycott the 10/11 December Marrakesh signing of the West’s suicide note – The United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration.

But it’s alright, don’t worry. Britain will be there (along with Holland and our German overlords) enthusiastically signing away control over our borders and our country – or, at least, what little is left of our diverse, multi-culturally-enriched country. After all, can you imagine the outraged, foam-flecked howling and screaming from the UK-hating, lefty libtards at the BBC and C4 News if the British government were to have the cojones to follow countries like the US, Australia, Poland, Israel, Austria, Hungary, Italy, France, Bulgaria, Slovakia and the Czech Republic by refusing to submit to United Nations control?

Treacherous liar and waste of skin Theresa May has already handed over almost total sovereignty of our country and our future to the corrupt, undemocratic, German-controlled EU Fourth Reich. So, passing control of our borders to the United Nations would only be a logical next step in the total surrender and destruction of our once great country. Meanwhile the petition against signing The United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration has now passed 110,000 signatures. But, of course, this will be totally ignored by our spineless, West-loathing, virtue-signalling rulers. It seems that resistance is futile.

Losing our country

I hope all readers managed to watch the first 5 or so minutes of the video I posted yesterday of a speech in the Swedish parliament. It was a touchingly poignant lament by a patriotic Swedish MP over the loss of his once beautiful, peaceful, prosperous country.

And, while we’re on the subject of losing one’s country, here’s Paul Joseph Watson. Enjoy!

It’s no joke

(Wednesday blog)

A petition to sign

First here’s a link to a petition asking our useless, rapefugee-hugging, craven, lying government to refuse to sign the UK Compact on Migration

https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/232698

There are already over 98,000 signatures (there were just 95,000 this morning). Of course, our rulers will ignore this. But you might as well do it anyway.

Sir David – a clarification

Yesterday I wrote about national treasure Sir David Attenborough’s speech at Monday’s climate conference in Poland. Sir David warned that supposed Climate Change could lead to the collapse of human civilisation and the destruction of the natural world. But I wondered why the mighty Sir David didn’t (as far as I know) mention the most significant cause of increasing CO2 emissions and destruction of the natural world – the rapidly rising human population:

I haven’t managed to find a full copy of Sir David’s speech so cannot be certain that he didn’t mention the need to control our rising population but I’ve not managed to find any report that has him mentioning the need for population control.

So, I should mention that the great naturalist has previously warned about the need to control population:

https://futurism.com/david-attenborough-if-we-dont-limit-our-population-growth-the-natural-world-will

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/10/03/slowing-population-growth-key-saving-planet-says-david-attenborough/

If, as I suspect, Sir David didn’t mention population control at the great conference in Poland, I’ll leave it up to readers to judge whether that was due to forgetfulness or due to Attenborough’s abject prostration of his principles to the great god of political correctness.

It’s not a joke

There’s a joke doing the rounds in Germany. Yes, I know, Germans don’t have a sense of humour and their ‘jokes’ aren’t funny. But here it is anyway:

A Palestinian migrant posing as a Syrian refugee is walking down the street. Seeing another man, he goes up to him, shakes his hand and says “Thank you so much for allowing me and my 3 wives and 14 children to come and live in Germany and get a big house free and free healthcare and free education for my children and lots of money each month so I could afford to buy a second-hand Mercedes”.

The man replies “Don’t thank me, I’m not German. I’m from Nigeria.

A few minutes later the Palestinian posing as a Syrian refugee goes up to another man, shakes his hand and again says “Thank you so much for allowing me and my 3 wives and 14 children to come and live in Germany and get a big house free and free healthcare and free education for my children and lots of money each month so I could afford to buy a second-hand Mercedes”.

The man replies “Don’t thank me, I’m not German. I’m from Pakistan”.

A few minutes later, the same procedure – the fake refugee thanks another man only to be told “Don’t thank me, I’m not German. I’m from Ethiopia”.

This happens several more times making the fake refugee ever more confused. Eventually, after being told by yet another man “Don’t thank me, I’m not German. I’m from Somalia” he asks “where are all the Germans?” The Somali looks at the watch he has just stolen and replies “they must be at work”.

Here’s a slightly better German joke: “Yesterday I had a German plumber working at my house. But he connected the gas to the shower. Old habits die hard”.

The loss of Europe

And here is an extraordinarily poignant speech from a member of the patriotic Sweden Democrats lamenting the loss of his country. The speech is in the first 5 minutes of the 23-minute video and is the only bit worth watching. I apologise that it’s in Swedish which I speak. However, there are subtitles:

Lying scumbag May – have you no shame?

(Tuesday blog)

Twisting Theresa the Traitor

Watching the (IMHO) duplicitous, lying, self-serving, treacherous Theresa May desperately twisting and turning as she tries to hide the truth about her supposed ‘deal’ must surely mark a low point in British politics.

As I’ve already explained, Theresa’s stitch-up could trap us in the EU forever and prevent Britain making any trade deals with non-EU countries. Or, if we ever want to leave the EU, every single EU country can demand massive concessions from us by threatening to use its veto. Spain can demand we hand back Gibraltar, other countries can demand full access to UK fishing waters, the EU could demand the UK raises its VAT and corporate tax rates so we can’t compete with EU countries and so on and so on. And, if we sign treacherous Theresa’s sell-out, we’re totally powerless in the face of any demands EU countries make.

May’s excuse for a government is frantically trying to suppress its own legal advice, that we taxpayers have paid for, so that MPs, the press and voters can’t find out what a disaster May’s ‘deal’ is.

The dishonesty of our rulers is astonishing. Have they no shame?

Give generously to help produce more starving African children!

(Monday blog)

Yemen bollox

I guess we’ve all seen them – the TV commercials where ‘famous’, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling actors tell us that we need to give and give and give and give to help starving Third-Worlders in Africa. This year, it’s Yemen that we must help. And, as our well-heeled luvvie superiors demand our money to help Yemen, we’re shown picture after picture of poor starving Yemeni children:

It’s horrific and it’s difficult to look at. But I worry that we’re only being told one side of the story.

Yemen is a total Third-World sh*thole. It’s the poorest of the Arab/Moozerlum countries – and there’s some pretty tough competition for that prize. But let’s look for a moment at the population of supposedly poverty-stricken Yemen:

I’m no expert in demographics. But if excrement-covered, backward, stone-age, starving Yemen couldn’t feed its population of about 5 million in 1970 and then couldn’t feed its population of about 10 million by 1985 and then couldn’t feed its population of about 20 million by 2005 and then couldn’t feed its population of about 25 million by 2010, how the f**k is it going to feed its current population of just under 30 million now?????????????

Bleating luvvies tell us that the problem in Yemen is due to people starving because of the ongoing war. This is bollox of the highest magnitude. The problem in Yemen is NOT war, but that one of the poorest countries in the world is producing too many children. What Yemen needs is not more food, but some birth control. But nobody in the West dares say this as this would be considered waaacccciiiisssst and colonialist and Izlumophobic etc etc etc.

Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan – same story, same lies

For at least the last 60 years we’ve been ordered by our superiors to give generously – to Ethiopia, to Somalia, to the Sudan – the list goes on and on. But what has been the result? Ever more starving Africans.

When Saint Bob did his 1984/5 BandAid thing, there were about 40 million Ethiopians.

Now there are almost 100 million and in 23 years there will be about 200 million!!!!!!! Moreover, there’s a rain shortfall in the Horn of Africa (Ethiopia, Eritrea, Sudan) every 7 to 10 years. I think I read somewhere it’s connected to the El Nino weather phenomenon.

So, if primitive, backwards, basket-case Ethiopia couldn’t feed its 40 million people when Saint Bob single-handedly saved Africa in 1984/5, how is it going to feed about 100 million now? And about 200 million by around 2040?

Without birth control, Africa will drag itself and us into chaos

I’m fed up with the lies spewed out by self-serving charities such as Oxfam and Save the Children and Christian Aid and UNICEF and all the others of their ilk with their well-paid bosses and child-raping employees. We’ve been giving and giving and giving to Africa for over 60 years and where are the water wells, and hospitals and universities and electricity plants and roads and all the other things we’ve paid for time and time again?

They don’t exist because most of our money has disappeared into the offshore bank accounts of Africa’s billionaire, kleptocrat rulers or the pockets of well-paid charity workers. Meanwhile Africa’s starving, poverty-stricken masses reproduce at a speed that most rabbits would envy.

Africa’s problem is NOT a lack of food. Africa’s problem is a lack of birth control:

In the last 40 years, with their ‘one child policy’ the Chinese have taken over 600 million people out of poverty by ensuring economic growth is faster than population growth. In the last 40 years, Africa has pushed 600 million more people into poverty because population growth in Africa has always been faster than economic growth.

But with the population of Africa at about 1.3 billion now and due to double within 22 years to about 2.6 billion and hit 3.6 billion by around 2050, we are facing a total catastrophe. Not only will millions regularly starve in Africa, but tens of millions will flee Africa’s self-inflicted misery by migrating to Europe:

And they will transform our once prosperous, civilised continent into the same kind of violent, conflict-ridden, poverty-stricken hell-holes they have come from.

So this Christmas, give generously to Africa and you’ll just increase the number of people born into poverty and hopelessness.

In fact, we should only give aid to African countries which implement tough birth control policies and tell the rest to go whistle because their misery is entirely self-inflicted.

You’ve already been fooled and lied to by the charities so many times in the past. Don’t get fooled again!

Globalism vs nationalism – the greatest struggle of our times?

(weekend blog)

Day after day there is much heat and noise in the media about Trump, Brexit, supposed ‘Global Warming’ (or Climate Change or whatever it’s called this week), immigration, Izlumophobia etc etc.

But behind it all there is a very straightforward conflict – the conflict between Globalism and Nationalism.

Globalists believe:

  • countries and nationalists are the source of war
  • most electorates are ‘deplorables’ – narrow-minded, backward, ignorant and xenophobic
  • democracy is an outmoded concept that has passed its sell-by date due to the stupidity of most electorates
  • the multi-millionaire elites know best what’s good for us
  • there is a need to eradicate the concept of communities and countries
  • all cultures are equal in spite of the obvious superiority of Western civilisation

Here are some of the world’s leading Globalists:

And Globalists want to control all our futures by doing things like:

  • ignoring the results of any democratic votes that conflict with their policies
  • handing power to unelected, transnational organisations like the EU and the United Nations
  • removing borders and increasing immigration to dilute national identities
  • forcing diversity and multi-culturalism down people’s throats
  • destroying the careers and livelihoods of anyone they can brand as Climate Change deniers or waaacccciiissssts
  • crushing free speech by criminalising any criticism of their policies as ‘hate thought’ and ‘hate crimes’

Nationalists, on the other hand, believe:

  • people want to belong to clearly identified communities
  • people want to feel pride in their cultures, countries and history
  • politicians are elected to represent the interests of voters
  • unelected, undemocratic transnational bodies like the EU and United nations are often self-serving, wasteful and corrupt
  • excessive diversity can lead to a breakdown in social cohesion and to conflict
  • politicians should respect the results of democratic votes
  • people should always have the power to vote out politicians who work against their interests

So, whenever you see politicians and media talking heads spouting off about what we common people want, there’s just one question to ask yourself: are they Globalists or Nationalists?

Once you know on which side of this conflict they are, then their views on everything from trade to climate change to immigration to democracy become clear and predictable.

I don’t normally recommend videos longer than about 3 minutes. But this 16-minute video from Black Pigeon so clearly lays out the biggest issue of our times – the conflict between Globalism and Nationalism – that I believe it’s worth watching at least a few minutes of it:

Migration is good for us! Diversity is our strength!

(Friday blog)

Wow, it’s so exciting! I almost can’t wait! Less than two weeks to go before Britain signs up to the wonderful United Nations Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. Yipppeee!

Of course, some countries have leaders that are patriotic and understand they have been elected to represent the interests of their citizens and so have refused to sign this brilliant agreement. So far, countries that have pulled out are the United States, Hungary, Austria, Croatia, Poland, Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, Israel, and Estonia, with Australia, Italy, Belgium, and Switzerland likely to follow. But these countries are run by what our Davos globalist heroes like Merkel and Macron and Soros and suchlike contemptuously call “nationalists“. You have to realise that “nationalists” are bad, “globalists” are good!

Britain will, of course, sign.

And naturally there are waaacccissst, cynical critics who have dubbed the agreement a ‘suicide pact’ that will destroy Western culture and civilisation because migration to the wealthy West will become a human right for hundreds of millions of usually illiterate, usually ignorant, often low-IQ, often violent, often intolerant, usually unemployable, frequently deeply criminal Third-World migrants.

Critics have also pointed out that:.

  • the word “right” appears more than 100 times in the agreement
  • the word “democracy” doesn’t appear once
  • migrants are given legal rights to everything from social services to health care
  • migrants are given the legal right to bring all family members with them, no matter their skill or fit

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to erasing international borders, this UN deal also targets any local citizens who might object to their country being turned into a massive refugee camp.

  • it requires pro-migrant information to be part of school curriculums
  • it requires governments to “sensitize” and “educate” the news media, and to punish any media that don’t support mass migration

An earlier United Nations report gives suggested levels for migration for the years 2000 to 2050:

Germany – 40 million; Italy – 35 million; the EU – 153 million; Europe in total – 235 million.

The USA and the UK get off quite lightly in this total catastrophe with the USA scheduled for 44 million (because the US has already been so thoroughly enriched by migrants and criminal gangs from Latin America) and the UK getting a mere 13 million (I guess because we have so many multi-cultural enrichers here already busy raping, robbing and murdering while getting benefits, free housing, free healthcare, free everything). Though the one person Britain won’t allow into our country is Pakistani Christian Aasia Bibi who will be slaughtered by our friends from the world’s most farouritest religion unless she can find asylum in a safe country.

Some backward, prehistoric fools in the West have even suggested that the more diverse a country’s population is, the less cohesive that society will be and that too much diversity can lead to civil war as different groups fight for that country’s resources and political power.

But I’m a brain-dead libtard snowflake and so I don’t believe any of that negativity. “Tear down the borders!” I say, “let everyone in!”

Our future is so exciting with all these excellent people coming to enrich our lives in the West.

Here’s a United Nations video telling us how wonderful things will be. Although, this agreement is so fantastic that almost all the Western mainstream media have chosen to avoid mentioning it.

Hooray for migration! Hooray for the United Nations!

 

Written in Brussels, by Brussels, for Brussels

(Thursday blog)

UK surrenders to Germany

Yesterday I tried to explain that treacherous, lying, duplicitous Theresa May’s supposed ‘deal’ was a complete capitulation to the EU. Throughout the whole supposed ‘negotiation’ May has sidelined her two supposed ‘Brexit secretaries’ and instead huddled with Remoaner civil servants to concoct an abject surrender to the German-run EU – a surrender written in Brussels, by Brussels, for Brussels..

So, my thanks to a reader for providing a link to this article from the Spectator which explains in legalistic detail just 40 of the worst horrors hidden away in May’s surrender

https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2018/11/the-top-40-horrors-lurking-in-the-small-print-of-theresa-mays-brexit-deal/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

To paraphrase a real leader “never in the history of human affairs has so much been given away so easily by so few at the expense of so many”.

And now, with the weight of the whole ‘Davocracy’ establishment behind it, it looks likely that May’s capitulation to Germany will be pushed through by our globalist, UK-hating rulers condemning us to be a vassal state under the control of a German Fourth Reich run from Brussels in perpetuity

What a betrayal of the Leave vote! What a disaster for Britain!

Arleene, Arleene, Arleene, Arleeeeene

And here, to cheer us up, is traitor Theresa begging the DUP to support her plan:

Why we need to ditch treacherous Theresa’s dreadful betrayal of our country

(Wednesday blog)

There has already been much too much heat and noise generated by May’s Brexit supposed ‘deal’. And a week or so ago, I joined the ranks of the BoBs (Bored of Brexit) and wrote that we might as well accept Theresa May’s ‘deal’ and get on with leaving the EU.

But that was before I understood the poison pill hidden away in the small print. So, I would like to thank the diminutive French granny-banging would-be Napoleon for exposing the reality that May keeps trying to hide from us when metrosexual Emmanuelle Macron gloated that France would demand access to Britain’s fishing waters or else block Britain ever leaving the EU.

May keeps rabbiting on about the great future Britain will have outside the EU. But the problem is that May has sold out any chance of us ever getting to this future.

As far as I understand, Britain and the EU still have to negotiate our future relationship. Furthermore, as far as I understand, every single European country will have the ability to veto any future trade deal. This gives 27 countries the ability to blackmail Britain and demand anything they want. But Britain hasn’t got any cards to play in the negotiations to come. May has already agreed to hand over £39bn or more and to pay another £10bn or so a year for any further year we remain shackled to the EU.

We can already imagine the demands other countries will make – access to British fishing waters, special immigration rights for their citizens, loads of supposedly ‘environmental’ taxes on energy to prevent Britain becoming more competitive, maybe even increased business taxes in Britain to prevent Britain luring companies away from EU countries. The Spanish will probably demand joint sovereignty over Gibraltar. And so it goes on – demand after demand after demand. And we will have to give in to every single one.

For years into the future, Britain and the EU will squabble over these things and every year that passes will prolong uncertainty for business, cripple Britain economically, further enrich the EU at Britain’s expense and make Britain into a vassal state and a global laughing stock. (This is presumably why May’s excuse for a government refuses to publish the full legal advice on her proposed betrayal of our country)

For this reason and this reason alone we need to ditch May’s dreadful ‘deal’ and ditch the most incompetent, duplicitous, dishonest and useless PM our once great country has ever had.

When Trump made clear that May’s supposed ‘deal’ would prevent Britain signing a trade deal with the US, there were the usual howls of protest from the usual mainstream media and political talking heads.

But, as usual, Trump was right.

Any politician backing May’s capitulation to the EU is a traitor to our country. But we should remember that “greater love of himself hath no man than he will lay down his country for his own career”.

Here’s Nigel Farage commenting on May’s treasonous sell-out of our country:

Sunk by political correctness?

(Tuesday blog)

The pride of the Norwegian navy

Today I wanted to take a break from all the serious, ‘we’re doomed’ stories and instead bring you the sad tale of the pride of the Norwegian navy – the advanced frigate KNM Helge Ingstad:

You might have seen this story in the news a couple of weeks ago. The warship, one of Norway’s five top modern frigates, was on her way home to Haakonsvern naval base. Unfortunately, on 8 November on the way, the well-equipped modern warship managed to collide with an oil tanker:

​The KMN Helge Ingstad is one of five Nansen-class frigates billed as “unsinkable” due to its construction with water-tight zones designed to keep the warship “intact and operable”.

Yet the collision with the oil tanker left a big enough hole in the starboard side of the frigate for the warship to take on water. The crew was forced to abandon the vessel and now the ‘unsinkable’ frigate has sunk:

Oil tankers are quite big – this one was around 250 metres long. So they’re not the kind of ship that could tiptoe past one’s cabin window without you noticing they were there. Moreover, the weather was excellent while the waters in the area offer maritime traffic real-time shipping control. Also, there was radio-contact between the vessels when the accident happened.

So one is left with the nagging question as to why the frigate, with all its radars and sensors and other smart navigational stuff, could not spot the massive oil tanker and change course to avoid the collision.

It’s all a mystery

The big bosses in the Norwegian navy have been remarkable quiet about how they managed to lose their unsinkable frigate on a quiet, calm, peaceful day. However, the selfsame big bosses have not always been so reticent in talking about this particular boat.

In the Norwegian magazine, Armed Forces Forum No. 2 in 2017 it was proudly stated that “Four out of five navigators on frigate KNM Helge Ingstad are women“.

“It is advantageous to have many women on board. It will be a natural thing and a completely different environment, which I look at as positive,” Lieutenant Iselin Emilie Jakobsen Ophus said. She is a navigation officer at KNM Helge Ingstad, according to Defense Forum.

In yet more politically-correct, libtardian guff, the magazine claimed that:

“There has always been a perception that the Armed Forces are characterized by a very masculine environment, and in many ways it is true. It is mostly men in the Armed Forces, but it is important for me to show that you do not have to be ‘one of the guys’ to assume a role in the Armed Forces. Finding one’s place should not be at the expense of being a woman,” said Ophus.

When more women are able to work together, “it becomes easier to discover and to create a more balanced defense,” Armed Forces Forum opined.

In the same magazine where the Norwegians boast about gender equality in their Navy, they also explained that they are looking into every department of their Armed Forces to increase the  number of females.

Not only did the sinking of the unsinkable frigate cost the Norwegian Navy its entire annual budget, but the country reportedly lost millions with several oil and gas fields which were temporarily shut down due to the accident.

Perhaps they were holding the map upside down?

At this point one could be tempted to make jokes about women navigators and maps.

One might also wonder whether the good lady navigators were so busy discussing their lipstick or nail varnish or new hairstyles that they forgot to look out the window.

But I’m far too mature and enlightened and feminist to sink so low!

(my thanks to the excellent website zerohedge for this story)