Following my blog yesterday about the Albanian piece of sh*t who lied her way to a free kidney transplant thus condemning a British person on the waiting list to an early death, a reader wondered whether ethnic minorities were well-represented in organ and blood donations.
You can probably guess the answer.
But rather than me giving my biased, ignorant, worthless opinions, here’s part of an article from the British Medical Journal which seems to answer the reader’s question:
According to an article in the British Medical Journal“there has been a huge failure to boost organ donation from members of black, Asian, and other minority ethnic communities. It is a similar story with the registration of donors for blood stem cell transplantation, with severe shortages of minority ethnic donors skewing the cell type matches available.
Ethnic minorities constitute 10.8% of the UK population but are over-represented on organ waiting lists (24%) and under-represented on the ODR (Organ Donation Register). Of actual organ donors, only 4.2% are from minority ethnic backgrounds.
Although minority ethnic registrants on the ODR increased by 61.3% between 2008 and 2012, the actual numbers remain small (73,512 on 31 March 2008 and 118,598 four years later), and the increase equates to only 2.8% and 3.5%, respectively, of all registrants with known ethnicity.
Relatives of non-white people are also less likely than white people to give consent for organ donation from loved ones who have died in appropriate circumstances for donation (30.3% v 68.5% for donation after brain death).
For these reasons minority ethnic people have longer median waiting times for organs. This is predominantly a consequence of biological differences between ethnic groups because of disparate frequencies of different blood groups and particular combinations of alleles for human leucocyte antigen found in members of different ethnic communities.
A new approach should be to tackle the elephant in the room: the problem of apathy or so called free riders—people who are happy to receive an organ but not to donate.
We’re constantly being told by the progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling libtards that it’s our fault ethnic minorities don’t integrate.
Is it really our fault that ethnic minorities are so keen to benefit from organ and blood donations but less than enthusiastic about donating themselves?
Oh, and here to cheer us all up is Sweden’s total surrender of their country to the invading hordes – yup, it’s time for Swedes to integrate with the new arrivals rather than the new arrivals adapting to the Swedish/European way of life!
By the way, please note the subliminal message sent by the use of the young lady at the end of this short (one minute) video. I think this is letting Swedes know who their new rulers will be:
Toady I thought I’d bring you a small story, which the BBC certainly won’t report, and which shows yet again how our rulers – and particularly the NHS – are betraying us.
It concerns an Albanian woman who came to Britain using a fake Greek ID card to get into the country and start claiming benefits. When she fell ill, she was given a £72,000+ kidney transplant for free by our useless, foreigner-loving, Brit-hating NHS.
This story raises two issues:
How easy it is for anyone from whatever Third-World sh*thole to come to Britain using fake ID due to the total impotence of our supposed ‘border control’ (an oxymoron if there ever was one). Officially the population of the UK in 2016 was 65.6 million. But in 2007, one supermarket chain calculated that there were actually 77 to 80 million people in Britain
There is a shortage of kidneys for people needing a transplant. So how did a foreigner supposedly from Greece – a country that is such an economic basket case that girls will sell themselves for €10 a time (suck and fuck), the price of a pork kebab – get to the front of the transplant queue? Given that British citizens are dying while waiting for a kidney transplant, some Brit will die in order for this Albanian scumbag pretending to be Greek could get her transplant for free
Here’s the story:
Fatmira Tafa, 31, came to Britain in 2014 in the back of a lorry. Nadricim Bengasi, also an illegal immigrant, gave Tafa a falsified Greek ID in the name of Eleni Manola, so that she could pose as a European Union citizen and gain access to British benefits and services.
It was while living in Cardiff, Wales, that Tafa became ill and received treatment and a kidney transplant on the NHS at University Hospital Wales in October 2016, costing the hospital a total of £72,469. As an Albanian citizen, she would have been placed on dialysis, stabilised, and returned to Albania — but, posing as an EU citizen, she gained access to Wales’s organ waiting list, depriving a British person of the life-saving operation.
In Wales in 2015/16, there were 242 patients waiting for a vital organ transplant — up 10 per cent from two years before — and 27 people died waiting.
Last year, the NHS reported that across the whole of the United Kingdom, waiting time for a kidney transplant was down by 18 per cent, but patients were still having to wait 944 days — more than two and a half years. The taxpayer-funded health service also noted that since the previous World Kidney Day, 62 per cent of patients who have died waiting for an organ transplant were waiting for a kidney.
“Health tourism” continues to cost the UK taxpayer around £2 billion a year, with one non-EU citizen leaving a Manchester hospital with a £530,000 bill.
It is not just non-EU citizens who are short-changing Britons. Figures obtained from the Department of Health through Freedom of Information requests showed that the United Kingdom paid out over £630 million to EU and other European Economic Area countries like Norway for Britons’ health care abroad under supposedly reciprocal rules. However, the UK claimed back only a little under £66.5 million from EU/EEA countries for NHS treatment — a discrepancy of some £564 million, or £11 million a week.
No wonder our useless, mismanaged NHS is forever claiming it needs more money. After all, any piece of lying garbage from anywhere in the world can waltz into the UK and demand and get free medical treatment while being prioritised ahead of local Brits.
Here, from the “thereligionofpeace.com” website, are just a few headlines of stories of multi-cultural enrichment from around the world over the last few days. But there are so many that make one’s spirit soar with joy, it’s difficult to know which one to focus on:
With so much fake news, propaganda and lies on the Internet and in the mainstream media, who knows what to believe?
What is known and certain is that Hitler used a ‘false flag’ incident to justify the invasion of Poland. Stalin used one to justify the invasion of Finland. The US used several to justify escalating the Vietnam war and the US had planned to down one of its own planes or sink one of its own ships near Cuba to justify an invasion there. And then, of course, there was our very own Anthony Blair with his dodgy dossier used to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq.
These are just a few of many ‘false flag’ incidents used by politicians to fool the public and justify military action. And every time there is a ‘false flag’ incident, the mainstream media conveniently and remarkably swallows the government line about what happened and never dares question the official narrative.
So, what really happened in Syria? For the last couple of blogs, I’ve presented reports from that ‘ever reliable’ source – Russian TV – predicting a ‘false flag’ chemical attack on civilians which the West would use to justify military action against Assad’s forces.
But was it really Assad’s forces or the bearded, lunatic, anyone-slaughtering supposed ‘rebels’ – actually Izlumic terrorists – who used chlorine gas? Who knows?
But here are a few pictures allegedly from Syria and possibly suggesting our rulers might even be lying to us. You can make up your own minds.
Here’s one of the supposed poisonous gas cylinders dropped on Douma’s civilian population:
Please note that the bed it apparently landed on appears undamaged, even though the huge ‘poisoned gas’ cylinder has supposedly just been dropped hundreds of feet by a Syrian army helicopter and landed with such force that it crashed through the roof. If you want to buy a strong bed, then clearly Douma in Syria is the place to go. I also noticed that the window blinds seem to have been blown inwards whereas one would have thought that a rush of compressed gas would force them outwards.
And here’s a very lucky little – girl – she’s been saved 3 times by 3 different rescuers:
And here’s a young boy before and after supposedly being killed by evil Assad’s forces:
And here’s a young girl supposedly lying between the graves of her parents:
And finally, here’s a young girl having her make-up done before her ‘dead body’ is photographed:
I don’t know what to think or who to believe. You can make up your own minds.
Oh, and here’s someone who, as usual, was right all along:
(to leave a comment, just click on the title of today’s blog)
Just one more blog about the supposed chemical attack in Syria. Then tomorrow, I’ll show you loads of faked pictures of supposed ‘atrocities’ by Assad’s troops in Syria.
Below is a YouTube video posted on 13 February 2018 – long before Assad’s supposed chemical attack which gave Trump, May and some Frenchman the excuse to bomb a few empty sheds in Syria.
The video is from Russia’s propaganda machine – Russian TV in the US.
Just like the video I featured at the weekend, this video explains how the rebels in Syria – the usual low-IQ, inbred, violent, bearded, anyone-slaughtering, moronic, lunatics from our favourite religion – will conduct a ‘false flag’ chemical attack to draw the West into the conflict against Assad.
Obviously I’ve no idea who actually carried out the chlorine gas chemical attack. But I do find these two videos ever so slightly troubling. And it is perhaps even more troubling that none of the Western mainstream media have mentioned these videos or the possibility that it might not have been Assad’s forces who were responsible.
After all, why would Assad take the risk of using chemical weapons? Assad has won his civil war and so had no need to use chemicals just to kill a few civilians:
I wouldn’t normally go to Russia Today (RT) TV for reliable news. But it is a bit worrying that the video below, predicting a ‘false flag’ chemical attack in Syria, was posted on Youtube on 17 March 2018 – a couple of weeks before the actual attack which has been blamed on Assad and which has given the US, UK and France a great excuse to bomb Syria.
After all, Assad was clearly winning the civil war and so had no reason to use chemical weapons just to kill a few civilians.
I was recently treated by the NHS and I don’t recognise all the stories of an overburdened, collapsing NHS that I see in the media. The ambulance came within 40 minutes – it would have been sooner if my case had been life-threatening; I was taken straight to A&E on arrival; was seen within 30 minutes by an A&E nurse with blood samples taken; saw a doctor within an hour of arrival; was assessed by a specialist nurse within 2 hours of arrival; had a CT scan within 3 hours of arrival, but this was just a precaution and would have been faster if it had been judged necessary; and then I was discharged with a promise that further appointments would be arranged. Sure enough, within 4 days I was seen by a neurologist and, the day after that, the hospital rang me with dates a few days later for an MRI scan and other tests.
At no time did I get the impression that the hospital staff were in any way rushed off their feet or lacking in resources. Of course, I wasn’t scheduled for any operation, so can’t comment on things like operation waiting times and cancellations. But my experience echoed the one I had 12 months ago when my mother spent four weeks in hospital after a stroke. The whole system seemed to be running with reasonable efficiency and in no way looked close to collapsing under excessive demand.
All this got me wondering whether we actually have two quite different NHSs in England – the ‘English’ NHS and the ‘multi-culturally-enriched’ NHS
The ‘English’ NHS
This version of the NHS can be found in two types of towns – towns where the majority of people are indigenous English or towns where there are quite a few migrants but these migrants are generally from Eastern Europe, are often well-educated and have come to England to work and not sponge off other people’s efforts. If these migrants have families, these usually consist of one or at most two children.
Most people using the English NHS only go to hospital when absolutely necessary; if they go to hospital they might be accompanied by at most one relative or friend; most of them wait patiently for their turn to be seen; most of them treat hospital staff with respect and most of them behave like reasonably civilised First-World human beings.
The towns where I live and where my mother lived are both ‘English’ towns where the population is mostly indigenous English and migrants are mostly hard-working Eastern Europeans. In both towns there is what I have called the ‘English NHS’
The multi-culturally-enriched NHS
This version of the NHS is found, I believe, in towns and cities where there is a large population of people from the Third-World who have generously sacrificed their lives in their home countries to come to Britain to share with us their rich cultural heritage – violence, crime, intolerance, first-cousin marriages, FGM, homophobia, misogyny, parasitism and hatred of everything Western civilisation stands for.
Rather than only going to hospital when absolutely necessary, the multi-cultural enrichers turn up at A&E at the slightest hint of any medical problem. When an enricher goes to A&E, they are usually accompanied by at least 5 to 10 male relatives – brothers, cousins, uncles or whatever. Many of these male relatives will never have done a day’s legal work in their lives and thus will never have paid any taxes to support the NHS. But they will all feel that they are entitled everything the NHS has to offer.
The enrichers will often barge into the hospital shouting at hospital staff and demanding that their relative is seen immediately, all the time jabbering into their mobile phones. The enrichers are not particularly given to queuing or waiting their turn. If the supposedly sick relative is female, there will be much histrionic ululating and moaning from under her Darth Vader fancy dress as if she is on the brink of an immediate and very painful death.
The enrichers are also very particular about which hospital staff are allowed the privilege of treating their supposedly sick family member. If the patient is male, the enrichers will often refuse to allow a female doctor to examine them as they consider females lower than dogs. But if the patient is dressed up as Darth Vader on a bad hair day, the enrichers will probably demand that she is only seen by female nurses and female doctors.
Because of all the shouting, pushing, arguing, threats and intimidation of hospital staff by the enrichers, it can often take at least five times as long to treat a multi-culturally-enriching patient as it does to treat an English one. Moreover, given the enrichers’ tendency to have huge families and their predilection towards first-cousin marriages, which often result in physically- or mentally-damaged children, enricher families put much more pressure on their local NHS than more civilisationally-advanced English or hard-working East European families.
I suspect that the hospitals which are collapsing under the demands of increasing numbers of patients tend to be those in the more multi-culturally-enriched areas of our once great country. But nobody dares suggest this as that would be a heinous crime against political correctness.
Every year millions of live sheep are shipped in horrendous conditions from Australia to a barbaric death in the Middle East. But some are perhaps lucky – the conditions on the ships are so horrendous that they die before our Arabian friends get the chance to slit their throats
Many die of stress, heat exhaustion and thirst
Their bodies are piled up around the ships
Many lambs born during the voyage die
The rotting bodies are dumped into the sea
I imagine they can’t be killed humanely in Australia and their frozen bodies shipped to our Arab friends as that would deprive our Middle Eastern chums the pleasure of halal slaughter.
Hopefully all readers know what a ‘spoonerism’ is. A spoonerism is an error in speech (often deliberate in order to be ‘humorous’) in which corresponding consonants, vowels, or morphemes are switched between two words in a phrase. These are named after the Oxford don and ordained minister William Archibald Spooner, who was famous for doing this.
Some better known spoonerisms are
on holidays people flung hags out of windows
at a wedding: “It is kisstomary to cuss the bride.”
Well, I’d like to add a new term to the English language – a ‘ruddism‘. ‘Ruddisms’ are named after our esteemed home secretary, Amber Rudd. A ‘ruddism’ is when you blatantly lie when claiming that more/or less of something does not lead to more/less of something that is clearly related when it’s blisteringly and blindingly obvious that the statement is a lie.
Let me explain. Yesterday the fragrant Ms Rudd dismissed claims on Sunday that police cuts were to blame for the rise in violent crime as she prepared to publish a new strategy to supposedly tackle the problem.
The home secretary insisted that, in spite of government cuts to police budgets and numbers, police forces across the country had the resources and the manpower to tackle the increasing violence on Britain’s streets. “While I understand that police are facing emerging threats and new pressures, leading us to increase total investment in policing, the evidence does not bear out claims that resources are to blame for rising violence,” she said.
So here’s Amber Rudd’s ‘ruddism’ – “fewer police does NOT lead to rising crime”.
I’ve tried to think up a few ‘ruddisms’ of my own. Here they are:
being stupider than other people does NOT mean you’re less intelligent
eating more junk food than other people does NOT mean you might get fatter
having less money than other people does NOT mean you might be poorer than them
prosecuting people for expressing concerns about uncontrolled Third-World migration does NOT mean you’re restricting free speech
more diversity does NOT mean less cohesive communities
being an inbred, low-IQ, misogynist, religious maniac obsessed with killing unbelievers and displaying an ISIS flag at your home while growing a long beard and screaming ‘death to all infidels‘ whenever you go out shopping does NOT mean you might be more likely to commit acts of violence or terrorism
Thank you, Amber Rudd for enriching the English language.
As our once great country becomes increasingly multi-culturally enriched, I imagine we can expect many more ‘ruddisms’ from our rulers in the months and years to come.
First the wonderful news – it seems that Hungarian patriot and defender of Western civilisation, Viktor Orban, has won a 3rd election victory by a landslide. How the treacherous, lefty, progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, Izlumophiliac libtards must be choking on their eco-friendly, fairtrade cornflakes this morning. Over the last few days, even the supposedly objective TIMES has been spewing insults and bile at Orban. Yet Orban has managed to beat a concerted campaign of establishment vituperation (funded by Mr Soros?) because the Hungarians were not afraid to vote to preserve their own country.
When an invasion is NOT an ‘invasion’
And now a truly worrying story of the suppression of free speech in France.
French conservative politician Nicholas Dupont-Aignan, who gave his support to anti-mass migration presidential candidate Marine Le Pen last year, has been given a suspended fine of 5,000 euros for speaking about a “migrant invasion”.
Mr. Dupont-Aignan made the comments on January 17, 2017, during his own run for the French presidency before he was knocked out after the first round vote. He had said: “In 2016, the Socialists compensate for the decline in birth rate by the migratory invasion. This is now!”Le Figaroreports.
On Wednesday, a court in Paris found the conservative guilty of provocation to hatred or discrimination with a suspended 5,000 euro fine being handed down. The case was brought to the court by the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism (Licra) which claimed Dupont-Aignan’s parliamentary immunity should not apply in the case.
Please note that the gentleman said nothing about the ethnicity or the religion of the invaders. Yet he was still found guilty of supposed ‘racism’
When around 156,000 troops took part in the D Day invasion of Normandy, that was apparently an ‘invasion’:
But when over a million possibly often inbred, possibly often low-IQ, possibly often violent, possibly often criminal, possibly often illiterate, possibly often unemployable Third-Worlders flood into Europe every year, according to ‘French justice’ (a wonderful oxymoron) that is definitely NOT an invasion
Meanwhile hundreds (thousands?) of ISIS jihadis are returning to Europe and being welcomed with open arms, free housing and lots of benefits. Yet Marine le Pen is being prosecuted in France for tweeting a photo of an ISIS beheading.
David Craig, on April 21st, 2018
