I can’t stand it. It seems like every TV channel and every newspaper and every political leader actually believe Global Warming is caused by human activity. This is truly incredible. Not since people believed that the Earth was flat and you could fall off the edge have so many been fooled into believing such misconceived garbage.
In desperation, I’ve produced my own David Craig video debunking the Man-Made Global Warming hoax in just three simple pictures.
So, you have a choice. Do you believe a (IMHO) ghastly, precocious, attention-seeking, pig-ignorant schoolgirl (who looks like a member of the Adams family) and a (IMHO) revered national treasure who has suddenly turned into a senile, doddery old fool?
Or do you believe my simple but straightforward explanation of the reasons for our climate changing?
I leave that decision up to you.
(Apologies that this video is a bit slapdash. But I still haven’t quite worked out how to use the free voice-recording software I downloaded from the Internet)
It’s a bit early in the morning to think deep thoughts. So instead, I’d just like to touch on something that I find deeply troubling but probably won’t explain terribly well.
Extraordinary things are happening in both the UK and the US. And they are both very similar. The progressive, virtue-signalling, liberal elites in both countries are refusing to accept that they lost the argument in 2016 and are prepared to totally trash democracy and make their countries world-wide laughing stocks in order to overturn election results they didn’t like.
UK – Brexit never meant Brexit
In 2016 we had the EU Remain/Leave Referendum. The Leave side won by 17.4 million votes to the Remain’s 16.1 million. In a democracy, it’s normal for the losers to accept the result with good grace and to move on. Of course, this is not what happened. Instead the Remain sore losers started screaming that the result was unfair (because they lost). Then we were bombarded with a huge turgid pile of excuses of why the result was unfair:
the Leave side lied to the voters
the Leave side spent more money than allowed
people didn’t know what they were voting for
older people shouldn’t have been allowed to vote
the Russians interfered in the vote
we need another vote in case people have changed their minds
etc etc etc
These excuses totally ignored the fact that the Government spent £9 million of taxpayers’ money trying to rig the result by sending pro-Remain propaganda to every household in Britain:
Moreover, the Remainers ran a constant Project Fear campaign vomiting lie after lie after lie about the economic disaster and hundreds of thousands of lost jobs that would follow a vote to leave. The Remainers also enlisted Saint Obama to threaten us with dire trade consequences if we dared to disobey the orders of the ruling elites by voting to leave the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic, globalist EU.
We were promised the Government would implement what we voted for:
But it was all lies – the progressive, globalist, liberal elites never intended to let us leave the EU and have successfully waged a 3-year campaign to sabotage Brexit and keep us in the EU.
Of course, you all know this. But what is perhaps more worrying is that we see an almost mirror image of this situation in the US.
USA – Clinton was meant to win
Again, let’s go back to 2016. The US presidential elections. Everyone assumed Clinton would win. After all, every single mainstream media in the US and abroad backed the Establishment candidate, Clinton, and she spent (I think) about 5 times more on her bid than Trump could manage.
But when Trump won (as with the Leave side winning in Britain) the sore-loser liberal elites immediately started screaming that the result was ‘unfair’. Then the US public were bombarded with a huge turgid pile of excuses of why the result was unfair:
Clinton won the popular vote
the only people voting for Trump were bigoted racists (the deplorables)
older people voted Trump and destroyed the future of young Americans
But the biggest excuse of all was, of course:
the Russians interfered in the vote
The Clintonites, naturally, chose to not mention the many millions poured into the Clintons’ already bulging bank accounts by the Gulf Arabs and what they expected in return for their generosity. They never mentioned that it was the Arabs, rather than the Russians, who actually interfered in the campaign.
Then, just as in Britain, we had a massive 3-year campaign by the sore-loser (misleadingly named) ‘Democrats’ to overturn the result of the election. In the US this consisted of a witch hunt trying to establish that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian Government to interfere in the presidential election. For 3 years the mainstream US media were howling “collusion, collusion, collusion” to try to overturn an election result they didn’t agree with.
But now, that it has been proven that there was no collusion, the liberal elites still can’t accept that they lost the argument in 2016. So, instead of accusing Trump of collusion, they’re going for “obstruction of justice”. Incredibly, they’re claiming that Trump somehow broke the law by allegedly preventing an investigation into a crime that never happened. We are moving into a mad world that only someone like Kafka could have imagined
It’s the same the whole world over
So what? Why have I just wasted several minutes of your lives with this?
It’s because I believe we have entered a new era in politics. This is an era where Democracy is dead because the progressive, liberal, globalist, bureaucratic elites believe that only they know what is good for us deplorable, bigoted, narrow-minded, racist ordinary people. Therefore they are convinced they have the right to ignore and/or overturn the results of any elections that don’t go their way.
Whether it’s about immigration, Izlumification, economics, globalisation, the environment or whatever, the progressive, globalist, libtard elites feel they can ignore the views of ordinary voters.
That’s a very dangerous situation which could lead to a massive and possibly violent (as we see in France with the gilets jaunes protestors) backlash from those ordinary people the elites despise so much for their ‘wrong-thought’ and ‘wrong-votes’.
I admit I didn’t watch the whole of the BBC’s dreadfully misleading supposed documentary “Climate Change – the facts”. I just couldn’t stomach so much misleading BBC progressive woke propaganda. After all, during my youth I spent a bit of time in the Soviet Union and so saw enough garbage propaganda to last a lifetime.
There were so many things one could criticise about the programme:
why didn’t the programme mention the effect on the Earth’s climate of variations in solar activity?
why didn’t the programme mention the effect on the Earth’s climate from small deviations in its orbit?
why did the programme not mention that CO2 is a vital element in ensuring plant growth such that many farmers growing food in greenhouses actually use CO2 generators to increase the amount of CO2 to improve plant growth?
why didn’t the programme mention the fact that a warming climate causes the oceans to release more CO2? So, increasing CO2 may be the result of warming rather than its cause?
why was a programme supposedly giving us the ‘facts’ spending so much time featuring protesting schoolchildren whose grasp of complex multiple-factor feedback systems like the Earth’s climate would be more than questionable?
But I’ll leave a full criticism of the trashy Soviet-style propaganda programme to people with a better understanding of climate science than myself.
The most misleading chart ever produced?
I’d just like to focus on one detail of the BBC’s propaganda programme to show how misleading the whole thing was. Despite claiming to give us the ‘facts’ on climate change, the programme (I believe from the bits I did watch) only featured one actual chart of the Earth’s temperature – the one that starts in 1850:
But why did the programme choose a chart that started in 1850? Why not 1750? Or 1650? Or 1900? Or even thousands of years ago? After all, there are been plenty of scientific studies using ice cores and other methods to estimate the Earth’s temperature changes over longer periods.
The well-worn 1850s chart is wonderful for the Warmies as it shows the Earth’s climate becoming increasingly warm as industrialisation gathers pace and spreads around the world. There you have it folks! It’s clear from the chart that the Earth’s warming climate must be due to industrialisation and the increasing CO2 emissions caused by industrialisation and the use of fossil fuels. So, the science is settled (claims Sir David).
But hold on a minute. Being an obviously low-IQ simpleton, I’d like to put the 1850s chart into a wider context. Let’s go back a bit before the carefully-chosen 1850s chart. Here are the estimated Earth’s temperatures taken from the study of ice cores:
Looking at this chart, we can see the Earth has clear warming and cooling cycles. Looking at this chart we can see that we are moving out of what has been called the ‘Little Ice Age’ and into what has been called the ‘Modern Warm Period‘. Looking at this chart we can see that current temperatures are NOT exceptional, but are actually below previous peaks. Looking at this longer-term chart, we can see how misleading the 1850s chart is.
Here’s another longer-term chart:
This one also suggests we are moving out of the ‘Little Ice Age’. The ‘Little Ice Age’ lasted from around 1300 to around 1870. Yippeee! By choosing a chart which conveniently starts in 1850 – at around the end of the ‘Little Ice Age’ – the Warmies can ‘conclusively prove’ that the Earth is definitely warming.
So, here are two key questions:
is the Earth warming? Yes, but as the warming plateaued for a few years, the Warmies started fiddling the figures to exaggerate the extent of the warming
is the warming due to human activity? No. The warming is part of a natural cycle in which we are now moving from a ‘Little Ice Age’ into the ‘Modern Warm Period’ and human activity probably has no effect at all on the long-term cycle of warming and cooling.
That’s why the Warmies love the 1850 chart so much. It hides the truth and supposedly supports their Man-Made Global Warming hoax.
The words “lying, data-manipulating scumbags” come to mind.
But it’s not the figures that are lying – it’s the people using and abusing those figures! By carefully choosing a short period – 1850 to the present – the BBC Warmies deliberately give a completely misleading impression of what is actually happening to the Earth’s climate.
Propaganda, deceit, lies! The BBC Warmies are at it yet again and again and again.
As for Sir David’s participation in what I believe is a hoax – legal considerations prevent me expressing my true feelings.
So, the venerable national treasure Sir David Attenborough was back on our screens last night predicting total catastrophe if we humans fail to act on Climate Change. He gave us all the usual warnings – “right now we are facing our greatest threat in thousands of years – climate change” and “there isn’t much time left” and “the science is clear that urgent action is needed” and of course “we are facing a man-made disaster on a global scale”. But these predictions of total climate catastrophe have a long and not very honourable history.
The prophets of doom?
In 1982, the UN announced a two-decade tipping point for action on environmental issues. Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Program (UNEP), warned on May 11, 1982, that the “world faces an ecological disaster as final as nuclear war within a couple of decades unless governments act now.” According to Tolba, lack of action would bring “by the turn of the century, an environmental catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust.”
So, according to this (IMHO) useless parasitic buffoon, by 2002 we should have been deep in climate doodoo.
In 1989, the UN was still trying to sell “a coming climate catastrophe” to the public. In July 1989, Noel Brown, the then-director of the New York office of UNEP was warning of a “10-year window of opportunity to solve” global warming. According to the article: “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ‘eco-refugees,’ threatening political chaos.”
So, we should have seen this disaster scenario by 2002, about 17 years ago. I’m still waiting.
By 2006 the situation was apparently becoming critical as Al Gore explained in his fantasy film “An Inconvenient Truth”. According to Gore we had just 10 years left to save the planet.
But in 2007, seven years after that supposed 2002 climate catastrophe hadn’t happened, Rajendra Pachauri, then the extremely well-paid chief of the UN IPPC, declared 2012 the climate deadline by which it was imperative to act: “If there’s no action before 2012, that’s too late. What we do in the next two to three years will determine our future. This is the defining moment.”
In 2009 our very own jet-setting multi-millionaire Prince Charles was apparently also an expert on climatology just like jet-setting multi-millionaire Al Gore. Jet-setting multi-millionaire Charles originally announced in March 2009 that we had “less than 100 months to alter our behavior before we risk catastrophic climate change.”
Later that year, at the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009, Al Gore sought UN climate agreement immediately. “We have to do it this year. Not next year, this year,” he demanded. “And of course the clock is ticking because Mother Nature does not do bailouts.”
Sounds familiar?
In fact 2009 seems to have been a popular year for climate catastrophe predictions. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon announced his own deadline in August 2009, when he warned of “incalculable” suffering without a UN climate deal in December 2009.
At the UN climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009, Prince Charles jetted in with the usual retinue of flunkies to warn us: “The grim reality is that our planet has reached a point of crisis and we have only seven years before we lose the levers of control.”
In 2010, the Prince of Wales said, “Ladies and gentlemen we now have only 86 months left before we reach the tipping point.”
But in 2012, the UN gave Planet Earth another four-year reprieve. UN Foundation president and former U.S. Senator Tim Wirth called Obama’s re-election the “last window of opportunity” to get it right on climate change.
By 2014, a clearly frustrated Prince Charles seemed to abandon the countdown, announcing, “We are running out of time. How many times have I found myself saying this over recent years?”
In 2017, Prince Charles’s one-hundred-month deadline finally expired. What did Charles have to say? Was he giving up? Did he proclaim the end times for the planet? Far from it. Two years earlier, in 2015, Prince Charles abandoned his hundred-month countdown and generously gave the world a reprieve by extending his climate tipping point another thirty-five years, to the year 2050! In a July 2015 interview “His Royal Highness warns that we have just 35 years to save the planet from catastrophic climate change.” So, instead of facing the expiration of his climate catastrophe deadline head on, the sixty-nine-year-old Charles kicked the climate doomsday deadline down the road until 2050 when he would be turning the ripe age of 102 and thus probably wouldn’t be around to see that his prediction was total bollox
And we mustn’t forget top UK scientist Sir David King who warned in 2004 that that by 2100 Antarctica could be the only habitable continent. Like Charles, Sir David won’t be around in 2100 making his prediction extremely convenient for him and his career.
The above is just a small selection of warnings from Climate Change doom-mongers.
Sir David – will you dare tell the truth?
When I heard that the great Sir David would be doing his bit for Climate Change, I wondered if he would dare deal with the following issues:
why were most scientists predicting a new Ice Age in the 1970s which would lead to crop failure, starvation and a mass movement of millions of people from the freezing North southwards?
why have all the previous predictions of Climate Armageddon been total rubbish?
why haven’t the Himalayan glaciers disappeared as was predicted by the IPCC?
why was the Arctic not ice-free by the summer of 2013 as was predicted by the IPCC in 2007 – a claim parrotted by loads of politicians?
why have the Warmies felt the need to fiddle the figures and falsify the data for decades?
why does he appear to accept the “97% of scientists” claim when we now know it was based on massive manipulation of the data? (I have explained how this was done in a previous blog)
will he face up to the fact that the main problem facing mankind is not from the West with its declining population and reducing use of fossil fuels, but from explosive population growth in Africa where the population doubles every 22 years?
But Sir David’s programme avoided mentioning any of the above issues. Instead it just produced the usual turgid pile of foul-smelling BBC Warmie propaganda with loads of fancy camera work to frighten the shallow snowflakes who apparently subscribe to the new Man-Made Global Warming religion. Even worse, the programme featured people whose work on climate has been totally and comprehensively discredited, but didn’t feature anyone who was critical of the Man-Made Global Warming group-think.
But perhaps the most disturbing part of Sir David’s programme was that the only temperature chart it used (if I remember correctly) was the one starting in 1850 which shows considerable warming. Had Sir David’s programme used the chart of the Earth’s temperature over the last 100,000 years or over the last 415,000 years, we would have seen that today’s warming is just part of a regular cycle and is nothing out of the ordinary. All very odd, don’t you think?
Sir David – I question your objectivity! And I question the BBC’s objectivity!
Today I wanted to warn readers about the most serious health threat facing the world. No, it’s not Ebola. And it’s not AIDS. And it’s not a new strain of Bird Flu. It’s not even growing resistance to antibiotics. The greatest health threat to the human population now is Crazy Lefty Syndrome.
Crazy Lefty Syndrome seems to mostly affect the young. The vast majority of older people, with experience of life, tend to have some form of immunity to Crazy Lefty Syndrome. Moreover, you’re much more likely to catch Crazy Lefty Syndrome if you’ve attended one of the Snowflake Indoctrination Centres which used to be called ‘universities’. Unless we soon find a cure for Crazy Lefty Syndrome, we could see the complete collapse of Western civilisation and the spread of civil war, pestilence and famine across the countries where Crazy Lefty Syndrome is most prevalent.
The symptoms of Crazy Left Syndrome
The short (3 minutes) video below describes the typical symptoms of someone with a serious case of Crazy Lefty Syndrome.
The video features a kindly 74-year-old Jewish man who goes to have his regular coffee at his local Starbucks. Unfortunately for him, he is wearing a “Make America Great Again” hat. While minding his own business he is accosted by an individual, who might once have been female. But, being a local activist, she/it has very successfully tried to make herself/itself as ugly and as unattractive as possible. Once again proving that old adage that progressive activism makes you ugly:
The female/thing is called Rebecca Parker Mankey. During the encounter she tried to get the other customers to rise up and force the 74-year-old man out of Starbucks claiming he hated brown people and was “Nazi scum” (an odd insult to hurl at an ageing Jew). She/it left the Starbucks only to return a few minutes later to vent her/its bile at the man again.
Later she took to Facebook to inform the world of her glorious fight against the man and she threatened “I am going to publicly shame him in town and try to get him fired and kicked out of every club he is in. I am going to go to his house march up and down carrying a sign that says he hates black people. I am going to organize protests where he works to make him feel as unsafe as he made every brown person he met today.”
When people started criticising her for her behaviour, she claimed with the usual Crazy Lefty Syndrome logic “I am right and those attacking me are wrong”.
Although this incident took place in the USA, you’ll see many people in the UK also infected by Crazy Lefty Syndrome. In fact, there are hundreds of them bringing chaos to London commuters at the moment. But we’ll discuss that tomorrow.
Anyway, here’s the Palo Alto activist Rebecca Parker Mankey story – the tale of someone with possibly fatal Crazy Lefty Syndrome:
I imagine we’ve all had bad days at work. But I can’t help feeling a little sorry for the French workman who caused more than £600m damage to one of the most important buildings in the world, the 850-year-old Notre Dame in Paris, by either forgetting to turn off some equipment or by connecting up some wires badly. This morning he really must be thinking “merde!“ and “double merde!”
The South African army?
Talking of “merde”, I came across this brief (3 minutes) video clip of the South African army on a training exercise. The South African army used to be considered pretty tough and effective. But that was many years ago. The army would have changed a lot since the wonderful, incompetent and utterly corrupt ANC came to power and made its insiders very very rich indeed.
Being a progressive, brain-dead, virtue-signalling, stop-climate-change, tear-down-borders, build-bridges, hug-a-rapefugee, snowflake libtard, I, of course, don’t subscribe to the many studies that suggest different races have different IQ levels and that national wealth and success of countries is linked to the average IQ of their citizens:
But, watching the brief video below, I did start to wonder.
The best bit is at around one minute 40 secs when the officer gives the command “by the left, quick march!“:
I’m not a conspiracy theorist. I believe that incompetence is the likely cause of the Notre Dame fire:
It does seem that the fire was caused by an accident during restoration work. Probably some dopey Froggy workman called Gaston throwing away a half-smoked Gauloise or something like that.
However, it may be worth drawing readers’ attention to an article published in the Guardian newspaper on 9 September 2016:
Cell of French women guided by Isis behind failed Notre Dame attack
A cell of radicalised French women guided by Islamic State commanders in Syria was behind a failed terrorist attack near Paris’s Notre Dame Cathedral last weekend and planned another violent attack this week before they were intercepted by police, the Paris prosecutor has said.
The women, aged 19, 23 and 39, were arrested in Boussy-Saint-Antoine, a small town 19 miles (30km) south-east of Paris, on Thursday night after they were linked to the discovery of a car packed with gas cylinders parked near the cathedral last weekend.
It may also be relevant to mention that in 2017, 1,045 of France’s 42,258 churches were vandalised and desecrated. That’s around 20 a week. In 2018, the figure was 875 French churches vandalised and desecrated – ‘only’ 17 a week.
Oh, sorry. In its extensive reporting of the Notre Dame fire, did the BBC ‘forget’ to mention the daily attacks on French churches? How surprising!
These attacks tend to include smashing statues and crosses, breaking stained glass windows, smearing excrement on the walls often in the shape of a cross and the occasional bit of arson. Of course, we don’t know who is responsible for this historically high level of attacks on France’s churches. They clearly have nothing to do with ever-increasing immigration by members of our favourite religion. To suggest that would be racist and inciting hatred.
Oh, and to finish, here’s a nice picture of Paris’s historic Saint-Sulpice church from 17 March 2019:
Clearly this fire and the Notre Dame fire are not related in any way. And I assume it would be somehow illegal for me to feature here some ISIS propaganda showing major landmarks in Paris, London and Berlin engulfed in flames?
Anyway, if the Notre Dame fire was caused by our friends from the Religion of Wonderfullness, we’re unlikely ever to be told the truth for the usual obvious reasons.
Today I thought I’d take it easy and just bring you a little snippet of good news from Malmö in Sweden. This is a good news story the BBC and C4 News might ‘forget’ to mention.
You know Sweden – a once peaceful, laid-back, tolerant, almost crime-free country.
A country of endless forests:
and beautiful blondes:
I speak Swedish and worked there for a couple of years before the great migrant invasion really began. Back then Sweden was mega-boring. Nothing ever happened. There was almost no crime. If Jon “F**k the Tories” Snow from C4 News had visited Sweden a couple of decades ago, he probably would have complained that he had “never seen so many white people”.
Well, thanks to a massive migrant invasion, Sweden is no longer boring. Now it’s diverse and multi-cultural and there’s always something exciting happening there:
And if you’re female, there’s always plenty of action to be had in once boring Sweden:
If Jon “F**k the Tories” Snow were to visit Sweden now, he wouldn’t have to worry about there being too many white people, especially if he was to visit the largely immigrant Swedish city of Malmö (twinned with Mogadishu).
March of 2019 has been the first month in more than three years in which the Swedish southern city of Malmö – a virtual no-go area for police, emergency services and white Swedes – has not had any reported shootings, according to police.
The last month in which the city saw no reported shootings was in September of 2015, the authorities said, adding that they were pleased there appeared to be a break in such incidents for the month, broadcaster Sveriges Radioreports.
Jonas Karlberg, group manager at the investigation section for serious crime in Malmö, commented: “We had an incredible number of shootings in 2016, 2017 and also to some extent in 2018. So it is clear that as long as there are no shots fired in Malmö we are incredibly satisfied”.
Let me put this into context. The population of Malmö is about 317,000. In comparison, the population of Nottingham is about 316,000 and Coventry is about 326,000. Yet, as far as I know, there isn’t a shooting every month in either Nottingham or Coventry.
Oh, the joys of uncontrolled Third-World immigration:
Luckily for Sweden, the country’s progressive, libtard, virtue-signalling leaders have eagerly signed up to the UN Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. So the lull in shootings in once peaceful Malmö may only be temporary.
Ooops. As I write this, I’ve just found out that the Malmö shootings have started again
This respite from gun crime did not last beyond the month of March, however, with an incident taking place earlier last week on Wednesday night in the heavily-migrant populated suburb of Rosengård(an area near the centre of Malmö) sometimes referred to as a “no-go zone”.
Police say that a gunman shot at a residential building and that there were people home during the shooting, although no-one was injured.
The decline in fatal shootings in Malmö comes after a record number of shooting deaths across Sweden in 2018, with Stockholm police expert Gunnar Appelgren describing the country as being akin to a “state at war” in December due to the high levels of gang conflict
We, the British public, have been a great disappointment to our ruling elites.
Many of us:
think the ‘wrong’ thoughts and so have to be policed to prevent ‘hate thought’
believe news that doesn’t come from the Establishment Brussels Broadcasting Corporation and other Establishment mainstream media
are influenced by supposed ‘populists’ like Nigel Farage and Donald Trump, rather than swallowing the stories peddled by the over-paid, over-pensioned, arrogant parasites in the LibLabCon party
don’t want to remain as an impotent vassal region of an ever-expanding new German empire
don’t want to become a minority in our own country
don’t want Sharia Law introduced in Britain
don’t believe apostates and homosexuals should be killed
believe women should be equal to men and not oppressed and covered up like Darth Vader on a bad hair day
don’t want our under-age daughters brutalised by ‘Asian’ rape gangs
aren’t taken in by all the alarmist, “we’re facing catastrophe”, “we only have 12 years to save our planet”, Man-made Global Warming figure-fiddling tosh
are proud of our British heritage and of Britain’s historical achievements
believe British colonisation brought many benefits to millions in Third-World countries
aren’t ashamed of being white
vote the ‘wrong’ way
Given how stupid and misguided we the British public are, it’s only right that our progressive, virtue-signalling, Warmie, Izlumophiliac, Europhiliac elites should ignore the result of the 2016 EU Remain/Leave Referendum and keep us shackled to their beloved German Fourth Reich, wreck what little is left of our industry by imposing ever more ‘green’ taxes on the energy we use, leave our borders open to anyone who wants to come to Britain and try to replace us with people more likely to support our rulers’ great plan of creating a single, undemocratic European superstate in which bigoted, xenophobic, ignorant white people like us would be in a minority.
Here’s Douglas Murray explaining why we have so profoundly disappointed our ruling elites:
I have decided to try to do today’s blog as a short (2 mins) YouTube video.
Phew – finally made it. But as I couldn’t work out how to stop and start recording, I had to read the whole thing in one go, which isn’t ideal.
Also, I spent a lot of time trying to work out how to convert the file to a format accepted by YouTube
Apologies – I’ve just realised I made one stupid mistake – I mention the £9m the Government spent on pro-Remain propaganda but then I say the Government “gave £9m to the Leavers”. It should, of course have been “the Government gave £9m to the Remainers“. But to change these few words would mean re-recording the whole thing.
It’s a bit rough and ready. But here it is anyway – Friday’s blog done as a YouTube video:
David Craig, on April 23rd, 2019
