We can solve world hunger today. But our net-zero-obsessed rulers won’t do it!

Monday/Tuesday blog

There is no food crisis

We’ve all been bombarded daily with horror stories about how food prices are being forced up and hundreds of millions of the world’s poorest risk starvation because the Russian invasion of Ukraine has prevented exports of grain and sunflower oil.

Well, let me give you some figures our politicians and the supine BBC and C4 News and the other mainstream media and prostitute experts-for sale don’t want to mention. They don’t mention these figures because these figures undermine the disastrous Global-Warming, climate-catastrophist, net-zero policies being forced on us by our rulers.

The US produces abut 384 million metric tonnes of corn each year and around 50�million tonnes of wheat. Ukraine produces about 38�million tonnes of corn each year and around 33�million tonnes of wheat. Around 20�million tonnes of the Ukraine’s wheat is exported each year.

Conclusion 1: The US produces an awful lot more food than Ukraine.

But let’s look at how all the USA’s corn and wheat is actually used. Around a third of the USA’s corn – that’s 128�million tonnes of the USA’s corn production – is used to make biofuels rather than being used for human consumption.

I haven’t been able to find out how much of the USA’s wheat is used for biofuels, but I did discover that in the European Union, 12 million tonnes of grain, including wheat and maize, is turned into ethanol – around 7% of the bloc�s production.

Please also note that just in the EU�3.5 million tonnes of palm oil is used to make biodiesel.�That�s almost the amount of sunflower oil coming out of Ukraine and Russia combined.

Conclusion 2: We’re burning food rather than using it to feed people

The simple solution

You probably noticed that last year the petrol you buy changed from something called “E5” to “E10”. E5 petrol is petrol containing 5% biofuel and E10 is, of course, petrol containing 10% biofuel.

According to calculations done by real scientists at Princeton University, (not the whore, climate-change-propagandist scientists-for-sale we see continually being interviewed by the mainstream media), if the US and Europe were to decrease their use of ethanol made from grain by 50 per cent – that would mean just moving back from E10 petrol to E5 petrol – they would effectively replace all of Ukraine�s exports of grain.

If our rulers were to completely scrap the biofuel mandates they have imposed on us, the world would be drowning in food and food prices would collapse. Then the only reason for hungry people would be the incompetence, stupidity, venality, corruption and greed of African, Arab and Asian kleptocrats.

The biofuels catastrophe

When the EU first mandated that 2.5% of all fuel sold in the EU should be made from biofuels, worldwide food prices shot up and the UN’s Rapporteur for Food said: �It is a crime against humanity to convert agricultural productive soil into soil which produces food stuff that will be burned into biofuel.�

He further argued that biofuels would only lead to further hunger in a world where an estimated 854 million people � one out of six in 2007 � already suffered from the scourge; 100,000 people died from hunger or its immediate consequences every day; and every five seconds, a child died from hunger

We’re now at 10% biofuels and, if I have understood correctly, following new climate change legislation passed in the US last week, the biofuel content of petrol is likely to be increased even further. This will mean diverting more potential food to fuel production at a time of world food shortages and rocketing food prices.

This is madness. But it get worse. Biofuels are less efficient than fossil fuels – you get fewer miles/kilometres per litre/gallon and they damage car engines more than fossil fuels. Moreover, the huge amounts of energy required to produce biofuels mean that they are probably more environmentally-damaging than fossil fuels.

Our politicians won’t act

Scrapping the biofuels mandates in the US and EU isn’t something that would take years or months to implement. It could be done this week and the results – more food availability and falling food prices – would happen immediately.

So, why won’t our rulers do this? Moreover, why do they seem to be moving in the opposite direction – by pushing ever more food into fuel production?

It could just be utter incompetence. Or it could be fear of a storm of criticism by the ever more vociferous climate-catastrophist lobby. It could be that they are trapped by their own save-the-planet virtue-signalling. Or it could be the classic reaction of politicians and bureaucracies – the more evidence emerges that their policies are misguided, the more they double down on those policies as they can never admit that they got it wrong. We’ve seen that with the Chinese lab-leaked plague vaccines – the more evidence we have of the vaccines’ ineffectiveness and increasing numbers of people harmed by the vaccines, the more our rulers push for us to take ever more booster shots of their largely useless and potentially dangerous�fake vaccines.

However, there’s a fifth possibility – that our rulers are acting together to deliberately restrict food production, push up food prices and impoverish us all as a means of increasing their control over us.

Most political movements such as leftism and Black Lives Matter and eco-campaigning and Extinction Rebellion are just greed and fascism dressed up as empathy. They pretend to want to help people, but are actually only interested in increasing their own wealth, status and their power over us while claiming they are acting in our best interests.

You can choose which of the five possibilities – incompetence, fear of the climate catastrophists, trapped by their own deference to the climate-catastrophist cult, doubling down on misguided policies or conspiracy against us – you believe is the most credible explanation of the current food crisis.