Archives

October 2019
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Why are we afraid to ban first-cousin marriages?

(Friday blog)

It’s difficult to comment objectively and dispassionately on the short video below.

It shows the horrors of first-cousin marriages.

In Birmingham, around one in ten children from first-cousin marriages either dies in infancy or develops a serious life-long disability caused by genetic ailments, according to health officials in the city, where over half the mothers of Pakistani origin are married to a close relative.

Thousands more children of consanguineous marriages survive, but with appalling physical or mental problems. These include blindness, deafness, blood ailments, heart or kidney failure, lung or liver problems and a myriad of often incurable and complex neurological or brain disorders:

According to one report British Pakistanis are 13 times more likely to have children with genetic disorders than the general population.

They are responsible for just 3% of all births, but produce over 30% of all British children with such health problems.

Meanwhile, a research document by the NHS-funded Enhanced Genetic Services Project reveals that in Birmingham in 2009-2010, the combined infant stillbirth and death rate ‘definitely or probably’ due to genetic disorders inherited from Pakistani cousin parents was 38 times higher than that among white European babies in the city:

The report — one of the most thorough into this health and social problem — says: ‘Almost a third of the affected children die before five years of age”.

Most of the survivors suffer chronic disability, and they are either cared for by their families, posing tremendous emotional and financial strain’ or (more likely) dumped on the NHS and social services who simply can’t cope with the mass of human suffering and misery caused by this primitive practice of first-cousin marriage.

Want to know who is really responsible for overburdening our NHS and social services? The BBC and C4 News will always claim that it’s old white indigenous Brits (who have worked and paid taxes all their lives).

But just a few minutes of this appalling video suggests who the real culprits are.

Of course, we can’t ban first-cousin marriages in Britain as the lefty progressive libtards would start screaming about waacisssm and Izlumophobia.

And here’s the result of our moral cowardice:

https://barenakedislam.com/2019/02/27/did-you-ever-wonder-how-much-muslim-inbreeding-first-cousin-marriages-is-costing-western-healthcare-services/ 

4 comments to Why are we afraid to ban first-cousin marriages?

  • Mark

    We are storing up massive problems for the future. Once the printing press runs out of ink and the middle class have nothing left to plunder then the fun will begin. What have our MPs done to our country? Given away in 2 generations.

  • William Boreham

    This was publicised in the Daily Mail last July.
    What subsequently happened? – Nothing.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5927581/The-tragic-truth-cousin-marriages.html

    Part of an amusing, (if scary) article from Taki:

    Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels has a much less groovy explanation: inbreeding. In a (poorly translated) article, Sennels reveals years of research that shows Muslims have been marrying first cousins, like, A LOT. And as we all know from retarded Pharaohs, hideous British monarchs, and curiously violent hillbillies, this practice is bad for more than your teeth. Inbreds tend to be stupider, more violent, less rational, and less likely to evolve. Ring any bells?
    Though it’s still the left’s favourite comedy target, you don’t really see that many yokels walking around Appalachia barefoot with a shotgun hoping a feuding neighbour doesn’t pop out from that holler over yonder. But the Muslim world is filled with shoeless, toothless, inbred, hill-dwelling, rifle-toting, sodomy-prone men ready to kill for a God they’ve never seen. They even have their own Hatfields and McCoys: They’re called Sunnis and Shiites.
    Sennels estimates that half of the Muslim world is inbred and cites several reasons for the intermarriage tradition. Mostly it’s to preserve the family’s status and keep the money at home, but it’s been going steady for 1,400 years, and like the elephants those Pakistanis refuse to worship, it doesn’t forget. You or I could marry our first cousins, and the kid would probably have an extra zit. Do it again and again for 70 generations and the problem gets exponentially worse. Next thing you know, you’re believing Sheik Mos’ad Anwar’s story about the guy who gave birth to a ratlike creature after making fun of Islam by sticking a toothpick up his ass. (The video’s been removed but it was a doozy of a sermon, believe me.)
    “I don’t expect this religion of peace to give peace a chance, but would it kill them to at least give scientific data the time of day?”

  • Alan Thorpe

    Perhaps what have we done to our country? We vote for them. Look at the younger generation. They are brainwashed into believing that multiculturalism is the way forward and it is the future that they are creating. When will the reality hit them?

  • Verk

    Even when gang rapes on industrial scales occur, the reality does not hit home.
    Barn door, horse, etc.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>