February 2023
« Jan    

Global Warming bollox exposed – by the warmists

You might be aware that there is a 2-week Global Warming (or Climate Change or whatever it’s called this year) jamboree going on in Lima (Peru) in preparation for another junket in Paris next year. The aim of the Paris knees-up will be to push through a “Universal Climate Treaty” with two main parts:

1. A plan to reduce CO2 emissions and the use of fossil fuels which will lead to massive increases in energy costs in the developed countries and the loss of hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs

2. An agreement to transfer tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars from the developed countries into the already bulging bank accounts of the kleptocrats running some of the world’s most corrupt and thus poorest hell-holes supposedly to help them fight ‘runaway Global Warming’.

Apparently there are about 9,000 delegates at the Peru conference. With only 198 countries in the world that makes around 45 delegates per country! Assuming each delegate is costing at least £1,000 in flights, hotels and meals (I suspect the real cost of these junketers is higher) then this 2-week beanfeast is costing over £9,000,000.

Luckily for the Greenies attending this fiesta, very few people have actually read and analysed what’s in the latest ‘we’re all going to die’ scaremongering report from the totally discredited Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

If anyone did actually read the IPCC report, deep within the small print they’d find this:

Box 9.2: Climate Models and the Hiatus in Global-Mean Surface Warming of the Past 15 Years

The observed global-mean surface temperature (GMST) has shown a much smaller increasing linear trend over the past 15 years than over the past 30 to 60 years (Section 2.4.3, Figure 2.20, Table 2.7; Figure 9.8; Box 9.2 Box 9.2 Figure 1a,c). Depending on the observational data set, the GMST trend over 1998–2012 is estimated to be around one-third to one-half of the trend over 1951–2012 (Section 2.4.3, Table 2.7; Box 9.2 Figure 1a,c). For example, in HadCRUT4 the trend is 0.04 ºC per decade over 1998–2012, compared to 0.11 ºC per decade over 1951–2012. The reduction in observed GMST trend is most marked in Northern- Hemisphere winter (Section 2.4.3, (Cohen et al., 2012)). 

Let me translate. At the current rate of warming from 1998 to 2012 – 0.04 ºC per decade – it would  take 100 years for the earth to warm up by 0.4 ºC. Or, if we take the rate of warming from 1951 to 2012 – 0.11 ºC per decade – the earth would only warm up by 1.1 ºC over the next 100 years

These are their figures. So it should be – panic over.

I suspect you won’t find the BBC’s supposed ‘science correspondent’ – the (IMHO) warmophiliac David Shuckman – talking too much about these figures as they don’t quite fit in with the BBC’s quasi-religious belief in the ludicrous myth of Man-Made Global Warming. In fact, this little gem seems to have been missed by all the mainstream media. Nor will any of our political leaders, apart from perhaps someone like Owen Patterson, dare stand up to the Anthropogenic Global Warming bandwagon.

So, in spite of the scientific evidence produced by the IPCC itself showing that global warming is actually almost negligible, we can expect the Peru and then Paris jamborees to result in an agreement to cripple the economies of the world’s developed countries and pour hundreds of billions into the waiting pockets of some of the most corrupt rulers in the world.

And there’s one other thing you can be sure of – our ludicrous balding buffoon, Energy Secretary Ed Davey, will be leading the charge when it comes to deciding how much of our money to throw at the world’s biggest thieves.

You couldn’t make it up!

(I hope some readers find this blog informative and useful. If so, it would be nice if a few more of you would support this website by buying copies of my books. And remember, although my latest book THE GREAT CHARITY SCANDAL is only available as an ebook, you can download a free app from Amazon here to read the book on any device – computer, tablet or phone)

3 comments to Global Warming bollox exposed – by the warmists

  • You will probably find that all the proponents of man-made climate change have some vested financial motive. As in Al Gore and an Inconveniant Truth being funded by parastic life form Goldman-Sachs seeking to profit from Carbon swoops.
    Back in August I saw this Greenpeace paid fundraiser in the Shopping center with a life size polar bear model. Claiming we had to save them from melting ice. The polar bear population has actually increased.
    Whenever you see a climate change promoter on the BBC the question that should be asked is, who pays them ?

  • Chris

    There are so many issues which the propagandising media and government push down our throats. Yet anyone who just gives these issues a little rational thought will soon start to question them.

    Unfortunately, if you do, you are labelled ‘denier’ or ‘conspiracy nutter’. We are thus led into being sheep or heretics on a variety of important issues. Rational debate is generally not allowed, especially on BBC and Channel 4.

    This is very disturbing. It suggests that the media government and corporate elements of society are working together for their own benefit, not ours. We are being deliberately misled on many many issues and dissenters are ridiculed.

    What would Copernicus have to say?

  • Keen Reader

    Well over 1000 years ago Greenland was sufficiently warm for the Vikings to colonise parts of the SW coast, where they were self-sufficient, raising animals and crops for a few centuries. Then, during the Little Ice Age, Greenland became uninhabitable and the colonisers left. Now it’s warming a bit again. Likewise, the Romans were able to cultivate vineyards in Britain during their occupation a few centuries earlier. Then, starting during the early Middle Ages, the entire Northern Hemisphere generally became colder and wetter and much of the peasant population starved. Malnourishment may it is believed in part have been responsible for the speed with which the Black Death carried off its victims. This relatively cold spell endured, with occasional remissions, for several hundred years. However, none of those who are making a comfortable living off the back of fears generated by so-called Global Warming (now quietly re-named Climate Change), swanning off around the world on first-class flights, consuming more fossil fuels and producing more CO emissions than many of us do in a decade, whilst enjoying luxury accommodation and well lubricated jollies at our expense, are likely to give any credence to the views of the dissenters, knowledgeable and respected in the scientific community as many of those dissenters may be. Sadly, for those scientists with the guts to speak out, dissention doesn’t bring in the goodies and the biases of Government and the Gvt.-controlled BBC denies them a voice.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>