This AI is unbelievable

Wednesday blog

In my Monday-Tuesday blog I showed how Chatgpt’s AI could produce satirical song lyrics in just a couple of seconds. Just as a fun experiment, on Monday afternoon, a few hours after Starmer’s immigration speech, I asked Chatgpt to write a 600 word blog criticising Keir Starmer’s latest speech on controlling immigration. I was amazed at the result. I had assumed that AI was just some kind of big computer system. But I’m now beginning to realise how powerful and revolutionary it can be. If a technical idiot like myself can produce satirical songs and blogs in just 2-3 seconds using AI, it’s hard to imagine what an intelligent person could achieve.

About 3 seconds after I asked Chatgpt to write a blog for me, this is what ChatGPT came up with:

In his latest speech on immigration, Prime Minister Keir Starmer unveiled a series of reforms aimed at reducing migration to the UK. While the intention to address public concerns is understandable, the proposed measures raise significant questions about their practicality, economic impact, and alignment with the UK’s values.

Economic Implications

One of the central components of Starmer’s plan is to extend the residency requirement for settlement from five to ten years, with reductions available through a contributions-based model favoring work in public services or skilled sectors like AI and engineering. Additionally, the government plans to restrict post-study visa durations and consider charging universities per foreign student. These measures could deter international students, who contribute significantly to the UK’s economy and cultural diversity. Universities may face financial challenges, and the broader economy could suffer from a reduced influx of skilled graduates.

Impact on Healthcare and Social Care

The proposed cap on care worker recruitment from overseas aims to push employers to hire from within the UK’s pool of economically inactive individuals. However, the care sector has long relied on migrant workers due to domestic shortages. Limiting this recruitment without a robust plan to attract and train local workers could exacerbate staffing crises in healthcare and social care, ultimately affecting the quality of services provided to the public.

Integration and Language Requirements

Elevating English language proficiency requirements for all migrants and their adult dependents is intended to enhance integration. While language skills are crucial for integration, the policy may disproportionately affect individuals from non-English-speaking backgrounds, potentially limiting the diversity and richness that migrants bring to UK society.

Legal and Human Rights Concerns

The government’s plan to limit judges’ use of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights to prevent deportations raises concerns about the UK’s commitment to human rights. Article 8 protects the right to private and family life, and restricting its application could lead to unjust deportations and family separations, undermining the UK’s reputation as a defender of human rights.

Political Motivations

Starmer’s rhetoric, including phrases like “failed experiment in open borders,” echoes sentiments often associated with right-wing politics. This shift appears to be a strategic move to counter the rising influence of the anti-immigrant Reform UK party and to regain support lost in recent local elections. However, adopting such rhetoric risks alienating progressive supporters and undermines Labour’s traditional stance on social justice and inclusivity.

Conclusion

While addressing immigration is a legitimate concern, the approach outlined in Starmer’s speech may lead to unintended economic and social consequences. Policies that potentially harm key sectors, compromise human rights, and shift political rhetoric towards the right warrant critical examination. A balanced and compassionate approach to immigration reform is essential to uphold the UK’s values and ensure the well-being of its diverse population.