It’s been a busy week for our betters telling us that we made a terrible mistake by voting to leave the EU. There was some bald, wigwearing botty-botherer (is “botty-botherer” politically correct?) popstar, someone else famous (I forget who) and then that great political heavyweight and crisp advertiser – Gary Lineker.
Here’s a wonderful article from the Spectator praising Mr Lineker’s intervention:
“Did Gary Lineker miss the first ‘people’s vote’ on Brexit?
Brendan O’Neill
Gary Lineker is coming to save Britain. From what, I hear you ask? From you. And me. And the rest of the dim-witted electorate who screwed up the nation with our pesky vote to leave the EU.
The football commentator turned crisps advertiser turned spokesman for the weeping Brexitphobic Twitterati has announced that he is backing the campaign for a People’s Vote on the final Brexit deal. Why? Because the nation is in a ‘mess’, he says, and it’s all down to the fact that ‘politicians seem unable to resolve the problem the people gave them in voting Leave’. Got that? The problem isn’t useless politicians: it’s ordinary people and our catastrophic stupidity. Lineker wants to save Britain from Britons.
Lineker’s transition from the squarest man in football to the darling of liberals who are increasingly horrified by this whole democracy thing has been mad. One minute he’s woodenly describing goals on Match of the Day, the next he’s being held up as the voice of political reason in a nation gone berserk.
The anti-Brexit chattering classes adore him because they think he’s a man of the people. Well, he knows about football, and plebs like football, right? It is testament to their gaping separation from the views and concerns of your average Brit that they think this filthy-rich TV presenter ensconced in his BBC studio and firing off Guardianista tweets every five minutes might be able to make a connection with the public. I hope he does front the ‘People’s Vote’ campaign, alongside Eddie Izzard, with maybe a bit of Benedict Cumberbatch for good measure, because then Leave will win (again) by a country mile.
Lineker’s siding with the People’s Vote campaign in order to help solve ‘the problem’ of 17.4m people’s backing for Brexit is a good time to reflect on just how anti-democratic this stab for a second referendum is. ‘People’s Vote’ is such a cynical, slippery phrase. We had a People’s Vote. Two years ago. A massive one, in which turn-out shot up, sections of society that normally don’t vote came out to vote, and an historic 17.4m people — more people than have ever voted for anything in the entirety of British history — said: ‘Let’s leave the EU.’ It was the living, breathing definition of a People’s Vote, arguably the first meaningful People’s Vote Britain has ever held.
But in the eyes of the second-referendum set, it wasn’t really a People’s Vote. It was an exercise in brainwashing, where lies and slogans on buses and fearful blather about Turks swarming Europe were used to hoodwink the moronic masses into voting out of the EU. Because we are that stupid and gullible. And so we need a second referendum to give the ignoramuses an opportunity to correct their idiocy and give the ‘right’ answer this time. Which of course is that Britain should stay in the EU and ordinary Brits should stop disobeying their betters and know their place: which is at the bottom of the pile, with all the other little people, where our only political role is to vote once every four years and then go home and shut the hell up.
Labour MP David Lammy has praised Lineker as a ‘top man’ and congratulated him for being one of those people ‘prepared to stick their neck out and not pander to the “will of the people” bollocks’. The will-of-the-people bollocks — it’s called democracy, David. You know, the thing that got you into parliament. We should thank Lammy for his unguarded elitism, because it captures what lies in the rotten heart of the argument for a second referendum: a quite nasty outlook that views democracy as bollocks, the will of the people as a myth that must always be put in scare quotes, and the likes of Lineker as heroes because they might help to correct the collective hysteria of the throng whose opinions on the EU we stupidly solicited in June 2016.
‘The problem’ in British politics isn’t people’s desire to leave the EU — it is this haughty, arrogant belief that the people’s desires should be overridden by those who know better. Stick to the football, Gaz — you clearly know more about that than you do about democracy.
Once again, I have to turn to Russian TV to find out what’s really happening in the world. After all, who believes any of the BBC and C4 News progressive, leftist, hug-a-rapefugee, hate-western-civilisation propaganda?
As you probably know, Spain has a newish socialist government. Displaying the expected virtue-signalling stupidity that goes with socialism, the newish Spanish government is talking about taking down the barbed wire surrounding the two Spanish African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla.
Why would the Spanish socialists want to remove the barbed wire? Because invading African migrants are apparently getting hurt while illegally crossing onto Spanish territory:
A couple of days ago, hundreds of illegal aliens armed with sticks and homemade flamethrowers broke through the border fence in Ceuta, according to the Spanish Civil Guard. Over 100 migrants and 15 border agents were injured in the fight.
“Over 700 sub-Saharans” attempted to storm the border fence, the Civil Guard said in a statement, adding that “at least 602” of them managed to cross the barriers. Volunteers and the local branch of the Red Cross said that 132 invaders sustained injuries, while 11 had to be taken to a local hospital.
Some of them were cut with barbed wire while trying to climb the border fence, and others sustained broken bones. The scuffles also led to 15 border agents receiving injuries. Some agents were burnt as the invaders attacked them with homemade flamethrowers while trying to avoid arrest.
Of course, our rulers tell us that we need these people as Europe’s population is ageing and these highly-educated, hard-working invaders will be a massive benefit to our continent:
Personally, I welcome all these wonderful people to Europe.
But sadly, there are some people who cannot see the benefits of the African invasion. Here’s just one person’s experience: (I have made many changes to this account to avoid any accusations of waaaccciiisssmmmm)
Hi. 11 years ago I moved to a small village in southern Spain near Almeria for the good life after watching the UK become more and more *********, thanks to the massive influx of immigrants from third world countries.
Spain was lovely and a good place to bring up my kids. But not for long. The plague that was destroying England soon began infecting Spain. Now, the village in which I live in Spain has become 70% migrant.
In my own neighborhood, migrants spit at us. They have attacked my kids more than once. They verbally abuse my wife and they have even tried to kill me, for which we are in court at the moment. More than 30 migrant kids and only one Spanish kid were on the school bus that my children used to ride. I had to take them out of that school because of the constant abuse they were subjected to by the migrants.
Migrants in my neighborhood live 10 plus to a small house. The migrant women are always pregnant, averaging 7 kids per family. We have seen them shit in the street in front of their government-funded free housing.
We are terrified to even go out in our own neighborhood because migrants are everywhere.
And we can’t move because no one will buy our house in a neighborhood full of migrant welfare-recipients who don’t own their own homes. Migrants have damaged my car and they throw stones at my dog, and at us.
Migrants have made our life Hell and we fear for our lives daily. Migrants all share social security cards to claim benefits illegally. They drive unlicensed, unregistered cars, and believe they have more rights than anyone else.
They call me “English motherfucker” and threaten my kids regularly. Can I move to America, please?
Anyway, here they come – the scientists, engineers, doctors and computer programmers who will save ageing Europe:
Truth? Oh dear. The truth is beginning to seep out about the murdering Toronto shooter, Faisal Hussain. First, perhaps surprisingly none of his neighbours knew that he had the supposed “psychological problems” his family now claim had plagued him all his life and neighbours described him as a generally “happy” person; second, he had a habit of visiting ISIL websites; third, the statement about his supposed “psychological problems” was drafted for Faisal Hussain’s family by an experienced, professional, award-winning Religion of Peace activist; fourth, when our friend Faisal came face to face with an Indian man, he told him “don’t worry, I’m not going to shoot you” (Faisal only wanted to kill white infidels).
Here’s the inimitable Paul Joseph Watson explaining this potential sh*tstorm better than I can:
As for the UK mainstream media – having told us all about Faisal Hussain’s supposed “psychological problems”, I suspect they’ll decide the story is no longer of any interest – after all, they wouldn’t want us to think the massacre was due to any particular religion, would they?
Political correctness? And here is the (IMHO) totally useless mayor of Toronto trying to reassure the public with all the usual platitudes. He promises to be “relentless” in finding out the causes of the attack. But looking at Paul Joseph Watson’s video, it seems we already know the causes of the attack. Instead, I suspect Toronto’s mayor will be “relentless” in trying to cover up the real causes of the attack.
In this video Toronto’s politically-correct mayor tries to blame a lack of gun control for the massacre rather than mentioning such things as “diversity” and “multi-cultural enrichment”. Crikey, (IMHO) Toronto’s mayor is almost as useless as our very own London mayor Sadiq “terrorist murders are a normal part of life in a big city” Khan.
You should probably only watch a couple of minutes of Toronto mayor’s video otherwise you might risk throwing up at the man’s deluge of vacuous platitudes:
Now we know the name of the Toronto shooter who killed a girl and a woman and injured a lot more innocent people. He’s called Faisal Hussain. I wonder what religion Faisal Hussain comes from. I don’t know. Do you? Perhaps his family have been Canadian protestants for ten to twenty generations?
What we do know is that the authorities were pretty damn quick this time to confirm that this mass murderer supposedly had “psychological problems” and therefore his murders had absolutely nothing to do with his religion. Here’s what his family said or were carefully coached to say:
“We are at a terrible loss for words but we must speak out to express our deepest condolences to the families who are now suffering on account of our son’s horrific actions,” his family said in a statement.
“Our son had severe mental health challenges, struggling with psychosis and depression his entire life. The interventions of professionals were unsuccessful. Medications and therapy were unable to treat him. While we did our best to seek help for him throughout his life of struggle and pain, we could never imagine that this would be his devastating and destructive end”.
So, our chum Faisal joins a long line of murderers from a certain religion who had psychological problems and therefore their murdering had absolutely nothing to do with their religion.
Exactly why someone with these apparently well-known “psychological problems” was allowed to run around Toronto with a gun has not yet been fully explained to us and probably never will be.
It’s the same the whole world over
Last week in Paris, a Muslim hit a 69-year-old Jewish man, knocking him to the ground, and then dragged him by the hair, all the while screaming “Allahu akbar, long live Hitler, death to the Jews.” The attacker was sent for a psychiatric evaluation; French authorities are apparently not even considering the possibility that he is a jihad terrorist with Islam’s special hatred for Jews.
Likewise in June 2017, a Muslim who stalked through a Jewish area of London screaming “Allah, Allah” and “I’m going to kill you all” was not a jihadi. A police spokesman explained: “He was detained by officers under the Mental Heath Act. No one was injured. This is not being treated as terror-related.”
Also in June 2017, a Muslim in a Metro station in Lausanne, Switzerland began screaming “Allahu akbar” causing commuters to run away in terror. But there was nothing to be concerned about: the prosecutor explained that “this is a person who was afraid his life was in danger. At the height of his crisis, he began to face paranoia. Then he called to God for help. This is what he did last Friday in the subway shouting Allahu akbar.”
In March 2017, a Muslim in Germany attacked a 59-year-old man riding his bicycle, bashing his skull with a hammer. Police announced: “The suspect may have a mental illness” and stressed that this was not a jihad attack, as the attacker was simply “mentally ill.”Another Muslim in Germany who wounded nine people with an axe in a train station was also not a jihadi; he had “mental health problems.”
In May 2016, a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” and “Infidel, you must die” stabbed four people, killing one, at a train station near Munich. Nonetheless, Bavarian security officials immediately denied that he “had an Islamic extremist motive.” Then what caused the attack? Bavaria’s state interior minister Joachim Herrmann said that the attacker had “mental disorders.”
In Southern France Muslim was arrested in June 2016 for a jihad plot to attack tourists and police. He was found with a knife and a machete. According to the Telegraph, “the suspect has a history of psychiatric problems and has been diagnosed as schizophrenic”.
In August 2016, a Muslim stabbed six people in London, murdering one of them. The BBC reported that “the Met Police’s assistant commissioner for specialist operations, Mark Rowley, said the investigation was increasingly pointing to the attack being ‘triggered by mental health issues.’”
In Uruguay, a Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” stabbed a Jewish man to death, and later explained that in committing this murder, he had “followed Allah’s order.” But a judge ruled that he was “suffering from chronic psychosis of schizophrenic type” and “was not able to appreciate the wrongfulness of his actions.”
In the same way, a Muslim who was shouting “Allahu akbar” outside a Brooklyn synagogue in July 2016 and had two knives in his car was, according to the New York Daily News, nothing to be concerned about: “investigations by the NYPD and FBI showed Joudeh, 32, was emotionally disturbed and not a terrorist threat.”
Does anyone detect a pattern here?
So, it seems that, however much our friends from the religion of progress and peace make clear that they are acting in the name of their wonderful religion, in order to avoid alarming the general population our politicians and obedient police and judges decide to tell us that screaming “I love my snackbar” while stabbing and shooting innocent bystanders has nothing to do with any particular religion.
I’ll leave this blog up for a couple of days as it’s quite important because it proves yet again how the ruling elites and the sycophantic mainstream media constantly lie to us. (Apologies for the blog being so long but I needed to prove what I was claiming)
Same-sex marriages (SSMs)
You might remember that in 2014 both Britain and France hurriedly legalised the possibly unpopular policy of SSMs. What a coincidence that both countries did this within a couple of months of each other! Over here, the (IMHO) liar-in-chief, David Cameron, claimed his government was legalising SSMs “because it is the right thing to do”. That was (IMHO) a lie.
The real explanation why both countries hurried to legalise SSMs was because their EU masters ordered them to. But our lying, slippery, deceitful politicians desperately try to hide the fact that they were acting under duress from the EU as this would outrage many ordinary people and stoke up even more resentment against our EU overlords.
Let me try to explain. One of the human rights guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights (to which all EU countries must be signatories) is Article 8 – “The right to respect for private and family life”.“Private Life”was defined as including“relationships between homosexuals and their partners with or without children”. Thankfully, for the moment,“Private life does not extend to the relationship between an owner and his pet.” Though, that could change in the future.
The European Court of Human Rights had already announced that same-sex marriage would be a “human right”, as soon as a few countries had legalised it. Once a few countries had done that, the court found that “the recognition in national law of same-sex relationships had, by our present day, reached a degree that justified a broader understanding of family life as that term is used in Article 8 of the Convention”.
If the British and French had not legalised SSMs in 2014, then gays could have gone to other EU countries that allowed SSMs and then come back to Britain or France and demanded that their marriage be recognised. And, of course, if the married gays took their case to the European Court of Human Rights, they would have won. This would have been hugely embarrassing to British or French leaders as it would have exposed how little freedom and sovereignty they actually had.
So, our rulers all supported SSMs, but didn’t dare mention the real reason why – that this was being forced on them by their EU bosses. And when our leaders claimed they’re legalising SSMs because “it’s the right thing to do” they were lying.
Liars, scumbags and traitors the lot of them!
Smart meters
Now let’s look at another, possibly unpopular government policy – the installation of up to 53 million supposedly ‘smart’ meters in 30 million homes and businesses by 2020.
Last week, in a highly critical report, a group of MPs predicted that smart meters would only save the average household about £11 a year and yet would cost each household and business somewhere between £250 and £420 to install – a cost that would be added to energy bills. This means that for most energy users the supposedly ‘smart’ meters would never generate sufficient savings to cover the cost of installation.
Moreover, most of the millions of ‘smart’ meters already installed are so-called ‘first generation’ and don’t allow households to switch energy supplier. So they’ll all have to be replaced at the cost of billions.
So, given that the smart meter programme has been such a disaster, why has the Government pressed ahead with it? OK, you guessed – because they’ve been forced to by an EU directive.
Let me quote from the official EU website:
Member States are required to ensure the implementation of smart metering under EU energy market legislation in the Third Energy Package. There is a roll-out target of 80% market penetration for electricity by 2020.
The Commission issued the document “Benchmarking smart metering deployment in the EU-27 with a focus on electricity”, jointly drafted by DG ENER and JRC, as COM(2014)356. This report gauges progress in the deployment of intelligent metering in the EU Member States on the basis of economic assessments of long-term costs and benefits (CBAs) of electricity and gas smart metering prepared by Member States and submitted to the Commission in line with Third Energy Package provisions. It also provides summary information on received Member States’ deployment plans and highlights best practices and lessons learned.
This report jointly prepared by the European Commission DG ENER and JRC measures progress on the deployment of smart meters across the EU. To date, Member States have committed to rolling out close to 200 million smart meters for electricity and 45 million for gas by 2020 at a total potential investment of €45 billion. By 2020, it is expected that almost 72% of European consumers will have a smart meter for electricity while 40% will have one for gas.
And here’s the totally implausible EU justification for this ridiculous project
While cost estimates vary, the cost of a smart metering system averages between €200 and €250 per customer, while delivering benefits per metering point of €160 for gas and €309 for electricity along with, on average, 3% energy savings.
But our MPs now reckon that the supposed benefits of £11 a year will be less than a tenth of those predicted by the EU ‘experts’.
Why did nobody mention the EU’s involvement?
When it comes to a possibly popular measure implemented by the EU – such as cutting mobile phone roaming charges – the mainstream media never misses an opportunity to credit the wonderful EU for its role in helping ordinary citizens.
But when it comes to possibly less popular policies like legalising SSMs or disastrously-expensive and pointless policies like installing smart meters our leaders and the sycophantic mainstream media are astonishingly silent about the EU’s role in forcing these policies on us.
Hopefully readers know that if you go on a flights, holidays or train tickets website, check the price of travel on a particular date and then don’t buy – the next time you visit that website for the same trip, the price will probably have gone up as the company knows that particular trip on particular dates are of interest to you. But if you check the same trip from a different computer/device, the price will probably be lower.
By accident, I just found that the opposite can work on Amazon. I was looking for a pair of Asics GT2000 6 running shoes (UK size 10 or 10.5). When I first checked the price, I was quoted around £115 plus around £4 delivery on Amazon. There’s no way I’m paying over £100 for some running shoes that probably cost about £2 to make in a factory in Vietnam. So, I didn’t buy the aforementioned running shoes.
Following my search on Amazon, every few days I got an email from Amazon featuring running shoes – in particular the Asics GT2000 6. But on the latest email, I noticed the price quoted was just £86 including free delivery. So I clicked on the email, went to Amazon and checked how much I would have to pay for a UK size 10 or 10.5. Sure enough, the price was £86 including free delivery. That’s about £30 less than I was quoted a week ago!
Though I’ve checked again today and am still being quoted less than £90. But I don’t know if that’s because they’ve dropped their prices overall or if I’m being targeted with a lower price because I didn’t buy the first 3 to 4 times I looked at the running shoe.
Of course, not every company selling on Amazon will cut prices if you don’t buy the first or even second time you look at a particular product. But it seems that some sellers may have set up their systems to cut prices if you look at a specific product several times but don’t buy it and then respond to an email featuring the product you didn’t buy despite looking at it several times.
I don’t know if the price was just reduced for me as I’d looked at the Asics GT2000 6 running shoes several times and not bought and I don’t know what price readers would be quoted for men’s Asics GT2000 6 running shoes UK size 10 and 10.5. But it would be interesting if readers were still being quoted around £115 plus delivery charges.
(You can leave comments by clicking on the headline)
2. Are 500,000 South Koreans white racists?
We all know that anyone who opposes mass, uncontrolled, Third-World migration and population replacement is a vicious, violent, backwards, white, supremacist, fascist, ignorant, knuckle-dragging, uneducated, bigoted, mini-Hitler racist.
So, why have over 500,000 South Koreans signed a petition demanding absolutely no immigrants from Africa and the Middle East?
I don’t know. But here’s Paul Joseph Watson wondering why 500,000+ South Koreans might be slightly perturbed about the thought of their peaceful country ending up like Italy, Germany, Sweden or our own once great Britain:
Another year, another set of crime statistics and another 12 months of rapidly rising crime. Overall crime has gone up from 5,864,000 offences in 2016/7 to 6,087,000 in 2017/8. We now have over 16,000 crimes every single day. And one of the areas with the greatest increase has been violent crime, especially knife crime:
Just on knife crime there are over 100 attacks a day!!!!
Two things we need to understand about rising crime:
1. Rising crime has nothing to do with immigration, diversity and multi-culturalism
Rising crime has nothing to do with immigration, diversity and multi-culturalism: Rising crime has nothing to do with immigration, diversity and multi-culturalism: Rising crime has nothing to do with immigration, diversity and multi-culturalism: Rising crime has nothing to do with immigration, diversity and multi-culturalism: Rising crime has nothing to do with immigration, diversity and multi-culturalism.
Please keep repeating this and eventually you might even start to believe it.
Yet almost all studies prove that the more diverse a society is, the less cohesive it is and the more likely is social breakdown. Just compare the incredibly low crime rates between ethnically-cohesive Japan or South Korea or Hungary or Poland or the Czech Republic with the rapidly increasing crime rates in increasingly diverse, multi-cultural Germany, Sweden, France, Belgium and Britain.
2. Real crime is NOT a police priority
On the same day that the latest crime statistics were released, with exquisitely bad timing a top cop warned us there there will probably be a surge in supposed ‘hate crimes’ when Brexit happens in 2019. So, here we are in 2018 with rapidly rising rates of robbery, murder, knife crime and burglaries and what’s worrying our thick plods – a possible rise in supposed ‘hate crimes’ next year. You couldn’t make it up!
Having had no fewer than three plods involved in investigating some supposed ‘hate speech’ I was accused of making on my blog, I can attest to how my local police seem more interested in stamping down on free speech than they are in stamping down on real crime.
Below is a video from someone called Paul Golding from an organisation called “Britain First” or something like that. The video is too long (11 minutes) and rather boring. But it shows the lengths our rulers will go to in order to intimidate anyone who dares criticise their policy of uncontrolled Third-World immigration. From what I understand, Golding was imprisoned for some trumped up supposed ‘hate crime’ or ‘hate speech’ or ‘hate thought’ or something like that. On his release, he had to continually keep his probation officer informed of his whereabouts and travel plans.
Despite the fact that Golding adhered to the terms of his probation order, he was hauled in by the police and anti-terrorism officers and intimidated for about 8 hours. The police and anti-terrorism officers ignored the copies of emails Golding had sent to his probation officer about a planned trip to Northern Ireland and still took him to court for supposedly breaching the terms of his probation order by not informing his probation officer of his travel plans. In court, the magistrate threw out the case and wondered why the police had wasted so much time and resources on it when there was clear documentary proof that Golding had complied with the terms of his probation.
This video show where the priorities of some of our supposedly resource-constrained police really lie and shows a dark side of Britain – oppression of white indigenous Brits’ free speech – few of us are probably aware of:
Why are some people so worried about uncontrolled Third-World immigration? Our rulers and the likes of the BBC and C4 News would have us believe that it’s because opponents of uncontrolled Third World immigration are racist, fascist, Izlumophobic, white supremacist mini-Hitlers.
It would never occur to the holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, well-protected ruling elites and their sycophantic supporters in the media that many ordinary people see a pattern with migration they don’t want repeated in their own countries.
Step 1 – “Help us poor helpless refugees”
First we’re told that we must accept millions of often parasitical, illiterate, unemployable, violent illegal economic migrants because they claim to be “poor, helpless refugees” and immigration is good for us:
Conveniently, most of these supposed “refugees” have destroyed their identity papers long before arriving in Europe so we can’t actually see where they’re really from and they’ve been trained by the Open Borders NGOs to claim refugee status:
The braindead, useless, progressive lefty idiots believe the “refugee” narrative:
Step 2 – “We want money!”
Whether they get residence papers or not, the migrants stay in Europe anyway and soon start demanding their “human rights” – money, phones, better food etc. Here are some “refugees” in Italy rioting and threatening to kill aid workers unless they are given more money:
The other joy we have is that these supposed “refugees” bring with them all their prejudices and hatreds and spend much of the time fighting each other:
Step – 3 – “This is our country now”
And finally, when there are sufficient supposed “refugees” in a city, we get no-go areas – here are some holiday snaps from Sweden:
We’re threatened if we don’t submit to their culture and beliefs:
And we’re told to leave our own countries if we don’t agree with our rulers’ policies of race replacement:
Happiness
And here, to cheer us all up is a shortish (5 minutes) video about happiness:
As you’ll all know, the Remoaners want a new vote on leaving/staying in the EU. The first deceit the Remoaners are using is to call this second referendum a “People’s Vote”. But we already had a people’s vote in which around 34 million people voted. But the Remoaners try to gloss over that by dishonestly claiming people didn’t know what they were voting for.
Moreover, the Remoaners know that, if we had a second referendum, the Leavers would probably win by a larger margin as people are getting so fed up with the whole nonsense. But the Remoaners have a cunning plan. Instead of there being just two choices in their “People’s Vote” – Remain or Leave – the Remoaners want 3 choices. These would be: Remain, Soft Brexit (leave under whatever May agrees with the EU) or Hard Brexit (leave on World Trade Oganisation rules). If we’re given these three choices, the Remoaners know that “Remain” will get about 40% of votes while the other 60% will be split between Soft Brexit and Hard Brexit. This will give the Remoaners the excuse to claim that there is a “clear majority” for staying in the EU.
So, please, don’t get taken in by the Remoaners’ lies. Like anyone from the corrupt, wasteful, German-run EU they wouldn’t recognise democracy if it hit them in the face.
Electoral Commission bias
The other ‘argument’ the Remoaners are using to demand their “People’s Vote” is their claim that the Leavers cheated during the 2016 Referendum by breaching spending limits. They, of course, don’t mention the £9 million Cameron’s government spent sending a pro-EU booklet to every home in the country. Instead they focus on the few hundred thousand pounds the (IMHO) totally biased Electoral Commission claims were overspent by the Leave campaign. Incredibly, the government’s booklet was called: “Why the government believes that voting to remain in the European Union is the best decision for the UK”.
Arron Banks from Leave.EU issued a statement: “The Electoral Commission is a ‘Blairite Swamp Creation’ packed full of establishment ‘Remoaners’ that couldn’t quite make it to the House of Lords, but managed to get their noses in the trough via appointment to public bodies like the Electoral Commission“.
“We view the Electoral Commission announcement as a politically motivated attack on Brexit and the 17.4m people who defied the establishment to vote for an independent Britain”.
“But don’t take my word for it. In the own words of the EC chairman, Sir John Holmes, ‘The Brexit Campaign was a panoply of Eurosceptic nonsense!’
“Other board members have weighed in with comments like, ‘Tony Blair was spot on when he declared Brexit was not inevitable’ and another commented that the young should not be bound by the result of the referendum.
But who are the Electoral Commission? Well some unkind individuals have suggested that they’re nothing but a bunch of privileged, elitist, pro-EU Remoaners:
So, please let me remind you precisely where the Electoral Commission’s loyalties lie:
On September 9th, there will be a general election in Sweden. The good news is that the patriotic Sweden Democrats are now polling their highest ever results – around 25% of voters (the yellow bar on the chart) say they’ll vote for them:
However, that means that around 75% of Swedes will still vote for political parties that hate Western civilisation and want to replace the indigenous white European population with imports from the Third World:
Sweden – before mass Third-World immigration:
Sweden – after mass Third-World immigration with probably over 90% of rapes being carried out by ‘New Swedes”:
Dear Swedish women, if you and/or your daughters increasingly become prisoners in your own homes and increasingly are sexually assaulted almost every time you try to go out, please don’t complain – after all, it’s what you voted for.
Here’s someone called Pat Condell giving his personal opinion on what’s happening in Sweden. (Disclaimer: I, of course, being a progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, braindead libtard totally disagree with everything this Mr Condell says):
David Craig, on July 28th, 2018
