More wonderful news from that bastion of Christian civilisation and common sense – Hungary.
Last week, Hungary’s government stopped universities from offering courses in Gender Studies, saying there is no need for graduates in the labor market and they take taxpayer money away from other programs.
In a statement, Hungarian government spokesman Zoltan Kovacs said that there is “no demonstrable demand for graduates of ‘social gender studies’ in the Hungarian labor market. There is no economic rationale for studies such as these, and so we have reason to presume that it was not created in response to labor market needs, and equally not to furnish students with skills that can be readily and directly converted on the labor market”.
Kovacs went on to say that such programs “take valuable resources away from other programs, and deteriorate the economic stability of universities. State universities operated from public funds must take this into consideration as the purpose of these higher education institutions is to meet genuine social and labour market needs”.
Can you imagine any British government having the courage to take on the liberal, lefty, progressive, virtue-signalling libtard establishment by doing something equally sensible? In Britain, if you get just one grade E at A Level, then you can study something utterly useless like Gender Studies at a new university and be entitled to around £50,000 in student loans for tuition and living expenses that you’ll never have to pay back as you’ll never earn enough to repay them.
After reading about what has happened in sensible Hungary, I Googled ‘Gender Studies’ in UK universities and found at least 64 MA courses in “Gender Studies and Sexuality”. But why would anyone spend three years and up to £60,000 getting a degree in Total Bollox (sorry, I meant “Gender Studies and Sexuality”)? Well, here’s one explanation I found on a university studies portal:
Gender & sexuality studies is a multi-disciplinary field dealing with the various social and cultural aspects of men and women. Sub-disciplines include women’s studies, feminism, men’s studies and LGBT studies. Masters and Bachelors in Gender & Sexuality analyse themes related to broad fields of interest such as literature, language, history, politics, sociology, law, and medicine.
Useful stuff, huh? And here’s another:
Bachelor’s or a Master’s degree in Gender & Sexuality Studies give you the insights and knowledge to educate the world against prejudice (new or old), and pretty much win every argument against obnoxious creeps. As a subdiscipline of Social Sciences, Gender & Sexuality Studies teaches you the historic, social, and cultural views of gender representation.
Why is femininity associated with soft words and shy glances? Why are men expected to be strong and powerful, always aspiring to become a CEO or a president? By studying Gender & Sexuality, you will learn how to challenge old concepts and invest in new ones, modernising mentalities and approaches. Graduates can be expected to find work in various fields, all ranging from:
• Teaching • Health and Welfare • Political or Public Policy-Making • Media Writing and Advertising • Management of Private and Public Enterprises
I’m seldom speechless, but reading this total bollox I really can’t find anything intelligent to say.
Can you?
As for the claim that Gender Studies can be an entry into all sorts of interesting and important jobs – I find that ever so slightly implausible:
Though, I stand to be corrected. Perhaps it’s just me who is out of touch. After all, in today’s politically-correct Britain, perhaps people with degrees in Utter and Total Bollox can always find well-paid (but totally unnecessary?) jobs, especially at the BBC and in the public sector? Maybe it will soon even be compulsory, in the interests of diversity, for all organisations in Britain to have someone in senior management with a degree in Total and Utter Bollox?
My latest book THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON
A reader has just contacted me telling me that I’m wasting my time trying to get my readers to buy my latest book THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON.
He’s probably right. So, I’ll stop wasting my time and yours.
Goodbye!
(as for the reader who made a small contribution to the running costs of this site a couple of weeks ago, I’ll be contacting you to return your money)
First a warning: Sitting in my bank for over two hours while they tried (not too hard) to find some money that had gone walkabout, I started flicking through a local estate agent’s magazine. I came across one article on home insurance. In it the writer claimed that, when you left your home unoccupied (even for a few minutes), unless all doors and windows were locked and unless all keys from the inside of doors and windows were removed then, if you had a burglary, your insurance company would refuse to cover you. Apparently, in the small print of many home insurance policies is an obligation on the homeowner to lock and remove the keys from the inside of all doors and windows.
If this article is right then, given that many people will often leave an upstairs window open when they are out and given that many people leave the keys on the inside of locked doors and windows, this means that many of us aren’t actually insured even though we think we are.
Perhaps you should check this with your home insurer?
Tourists – don’t go to Sadiq Khan’s London!
Now that only one in three ‘Londoners’ is actually white British, London’s multi-cultural-enriching mayor, Sadiq Khan, can be sure that he’ll be re-elected time after time after time. In fact, given London’s demographics, it was an incredible achievement that former mayor Boris Johnson managed to get elected twice.
And now with Mayor Khan firmly and lucratively ensconced in the mayor’s office, lucky Londoners are benefiting from Mayor Khan’s ever so sympathetic approach to members from London’s multi-cultural-enriching communities – crime is soaring!
One of the most popular crimes at the moment seems to be moped crime – robberies and acid attacks:
I believe that now a mobile phone is stolen in London every five minutes. So you can hardly claim our multi-cultural communities aren’t hard-working. That’s a lot of phones to steal. And, even if you don’t have your phone stolen, someone will probably stab you now that most ‘Londoners’ seem to carry knives:
So, what are the police doing? Well, not much actually. Here are London’s two intrepid crime fighters:
Impressive, huh?
Under their brilliant leadership an amazing 3% of moped crimes are solved. So, the message to moped robbers is “hey guys, with Khan and Dickless in charge, you’ve got a 97% chance of getting away with your crimes”.
Though this is hardly surprising when ordinary police aren’t allowed to chase moped criminals in case the moped criminals’ human rights are affected by them getting hurt falling off or crashing their mopeds. And, of course, in the incredibly unlikely event of moped criminals being caught, the courts will let them off anyway. After all, persecuting someone like Tommy Robinson is much more important to our police and judges than dealing with real criminals.
Or perhaps London’s police are too busy attending Gay Pride marches encouraging Mayor Khan’s beloved ‘diversity’ to do any real policing?
A cynic might be tempted to conclude:
And here, for anyone who hasn’t yet seen it, is my own personal tribute to Cressida Dickhead:
First, here’s sign seen outside a church in America:
I wonder if this sign is trying to tell us something?
Welcome to “pathological altruism”
Here are some wonderful people demonstrating for ‘open borders’:
They want 300 million or 400 million or perhaps 500 million or maybe even a billion or two probably violent, probably low-IQ, mostly illiterate, mostly unemployable, mostly West-hating Third-Worlders to be allowed to come to the West and destroy our countries, cultures and civilisation
Why would anyone be so stupid? Why would anyone be so utterly and suicidally stupid?
Here’s Paul Joseph Watson explaining a new disease that has infected the progressive, liberal, virtue-signalling, holier-than-thou elites, the mainstream media and their useful idiots on the left and among our braindead snowflake youth with their worthless university degrees in social justice and feminism and sexual politics and equality etc etc
The new disease is called “pathological altruism”.
Unless we can find a cure for “pathological altruism” the West will be destroyed. I suspect the only possible cure for “pathological altruism” might be a heavy dose of reality.
The (IMHO) liberal, progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, attention-seeking elites have been desperately crawling over each other in order to prove who is the most outraged over Boris Johnson’s rather benign but accurate comparison of letter-boxes and burkha babes. Johnson should apologise! Johnson should resign! Johnson should be thrown out of the Tory Party! Johnson should be prosecuted! Johnson should be hung, drawn and quartered! And so on and so forth.
The winners in this appalling “I’m more outraged than you” competition seem to be MP David Lammy and Baroness Warsi.
But, Lammy and Warsi, what about being outraged over these three guys?
Yesterday in Brighton, the botty-bothering (I hope that’s politically correct) capital of Britain, these three apparent multi-cultural enrichers attacked two gay men and hospitalised them breaking the jaw of one of the shirt-lifters (I hope that’s politically correct). Are Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over this violent homophobic attack? If so, I must have missed it.
And then we have the Rotherham ‘Asian’ rapists and the Rochdale ‘Asian’ rapists and the Oxford ‘Asian’ rapists and the many other towns’ ‘Asian’ rapists:
Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over 50,000+ white, usually underage British girls being raped and sodomised and beaten and tortured over at least fifteen years? If so, I must have missed it. Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over the fact that not a single policeperson or social worker or anyone else in the Establishment has been held to account for 50,000+ ‘Asian’ rapes of mostly underage white girls? If so, I must have missed it.
Here are some Christians being beheaded for being Christians:
To me this seems a bit more serious than Boris’s letter-box comments. Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over this beheading? If so, I must have missed it.
And here’s a Christian being crucified:
Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged over this crucifixion? If so, I must have missed it.
In fact, just two days ago a man in Saudi Arabia (I think he was a Bangladeshi) was executed by crucifixion. Were Warsi and Lammy and C4 and the BBC outraged? If so, I must have missed it.
And, just to remind us of Boris Johnson’s supposed ‘hate crime’, once again here’s a man posting a letter in a letter box:
Rather humorous, I thought. Though, of course, in politically-correct Britain, humour is now a ‘hate crime’.
So, don’t believe the professionally outraged desperately trying to destroy Boris Johnson.
Their selective outrage and hypocrisy are more than nauseating.
And here, from the good old days when humour was permitted, is a short sketch where Harry and Paul meet a burkha beauty:
We should have known. After all, the signs were there for hundreds of years – Scrottish men dressing up in women’s clothing:
(Still, at least they’re not dressing up as letter-boxes)
And now we’re told that children in Scrotland are set to be told that “your gender is what you decide” from their first year at primary school under draft education guidelines.
Drawn up by the left-liberal Scottish National Party (SNP) government, Education Scotland, and regional National Health Service (NHS) boards, the guidelines will be part of a teaching resource to be used in Relationships, Sexual Health, and Parenthood lessons, which schools must provide as a “core” subject from early years alongside literacy and numeracy.
Teachers will be told to highlight the importance of challenging gender stereotypes in classes under the new guidelines, according to the Scotsman newspaper, which said the changes will come into effect next year.
The newspaper reports that the guidelines instruct teachers to tell children as young as five: “Your sex is what you are told by a doctor when you are born. Most people are told they are a male child (a boy) or a female child (a girl). Your gender is what you decide,” the draft guidelines then assert, adding: “People might think they know your gender because of the clothes you wear or the things you like to do. You are a unique person, you know who you are.”
A spokesman (sorry, I meant ‘spokesperson’) for NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, which commissioned the new resource on behalf of a number of other agencies, said it was “still in its early early stages” but “will cover issues that young people themselves have told us are important to them such as consent, healthy relationships, emotions and feelings as well as LGBTI issues”.
The spokesperson added: “It is important that the advice and learning young people receive is relevant to its time and provides them with the knowledge and skills to help keep them safe and make the right decisions for themselves.”
“Scrotland values tolerance, Scrotland values diversity, Scrotland values respect, and above all, Scrotland values love.”
The SNP regularly boasts that Scotland is “leading the world” with regards to LGBT lobby-approved social policy, with first minister Nicola Sturgeon having led the nation’s biggest Pride parade last month.
And here is a picture that Scrottish children will no doubt be shown as part of their sex education:
Is Scrotland actually leading the world in stupidity?
Here we go again. Lefties screaming and howling with prepubescent outrage over some perfectly innocent remarks made by Boris Johnson.
Commenting on new laws in Denmark about banning the burkha or niquab or whatever multi-cultural enriching women’s made-in-China Darth Vader outfits are called, Boris Johnson actually spoke out in favour of women being allowed to wear what they wanted and rejected the idea of such laws being implemented in Britain.
You’d have expected the progressive, holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling libtards to be pleased. But Boris Johnson’s kowtowing to the Izlumophiliacs wasn’t sufficiently abject for the mouth-frothing, professional offence-takers. Why not? Because in his inimitable style Johnson suggested he couldn’t understand why some women would want to dress up as letter boxes and bank robbers. Cue – massive sense of humour failure, furious howls of protest and incandescent screams of “Izlumophobia” from the usual (IMHO) fascist, free-speech-hating, liberalnazis.
Here’s a man posting a letter in a letter box:
Clearly there is absolutely no resemblance between a letter box and the lady in the Darth Vader outfit. So, why are the UK-loathing, West-hating attention-seeking twats getting so hot under the collar?
In comparison to Boris Johnson’s rather innocuous comments, here’s something written by a well-known New York Times journalist. She called white people “only fit to live underground like groveling goblins” and complained about “dumbass f**king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”“dumbass f**king white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”
Imagine if dear old Boris, or any other white person had written this kind of stuff about black people or Chinese or even Moozerlums! Imagine if Tommy Robinson had written or said that! Imagine the outcry!! It would be deafening. Imagine the calls for prosecution for waaacciiisssssm!!!!! Yet the New York Times stood by the journalist — because like the rest of the Left, they think racism is perfectly fine as long as it’s against white people.
My latest book – THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON
Still only 0.5% of readers – not, not 5%, but 0.5% – of readers can apparently afford to, or be bothered to, show their support for this blog by buying a copy of my latest book. That’s more than slightly disappointing that 99.5% of readers won’t put their hands in their pockets. Times must be really hard out there. Or else somehow this blog attracts the poorest people in the country. Who knows?
Holidays in Spain? You’d better hurry!
Thinking of taking a holiday in Spain? Then you’d better hurry. Now Italy is turning away the migrant boats and now Spain has a socialist government, the country we once knew as Spain is being handed over to an invading army from Africa.
Of course, I innocently believe that all those arriving are high-IQ, highly-qualified scientists, brain surgeons, nuclear physicists and surgeons. But there are negative, cynical, misanthropic bigots who think that Spain is being invaded by people who might not make any great contribution to that country and that tragically Spain is rushing down the same road to hell as once wonderful, peaceful Sweden:
Below (until YouTube deletes it) is a one-minute video of a gentleman from Africa – one of Merkel’s magnificent migrant millions – hitting then kicking and stamping on a 73-year-old German woman.
The African gentleman in question will, of course, not be punished as the attack will be put down to mental illness as usual.
But where is the dividing line between mental illness and low IQ?
Using standard definitions, anyone with an IQ of 26-50 is classed as an “imbecile” while someone with an IQ of between 51-70 is classed as a “moron”.
If you believe the results of IQ tests comparing different countries, (which, of course, I don’t as I’m a braindead, progressive, virtue-signalling, holier-than-thou libtard and not a horrible waacccisssst) then you’ll see that the average IQ of many sub-equatorial African countries is in the range of 60 to 70. Ooops!
After over 100 years of IQ testing, the US military will not accept any candidate with an IQ below 84 as they’ve found that anyone with such a low IQ is militarily useless – a threat to other military personnel.
In fact, anyone with an IQ of below 84 is unlikely to be able to perform any useful function in an advanced Western society. Yet, if the comparative IQ tests per country are to be believed (and, of course, they shouldn’t be), then at least three quarters of the wonderful people flooding into Europe from Africa are likely to have an IQ of below 84 and more than half of them will have an IQ in the range of 51-70 which is generally considered to class them as “morons”.
So, are the hordes of invaders who spend their time robbing, raping, drug-dealing, committing other (usually violent) crimes and living off generous benefits rather than working actually suffering from real mental illnesses? Or is what we’re seeing merely a result of most of them having frighteningly low IQs?
I don’t know. But I do know that this is a question none of our mainstream media would ever dare to address as to do so would clearly be waaaccciisssstttt!
Here’s a link to an article in Saturday’s Daily Mail based on my latest book THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON.
So far, around 0.5% (no, that’s not 5%, it’s 0.5%) of readers have shown support for my modest blogging efforts by buying a copy. Hopefully that number will increase? I don’t need the money – but I do believe this is an important story that people need to know about.
So, if you know anyone at Uni or anyone with children either at Uni or thinking of going to Uni, why not buy them a copy?
In Sadiq Khan’s violent Mogadishu, which used to be known as ‘London’, apparently a ‘drill rapper’ was stabbed to death on the same street as one of his friends a few months before. No doubt this drill rapper’s family will be telling the press what a wonderful boy he was and how he loved his mum (I wonder if he knew who his father was?) and how he did social work in his spare time (when he wasn’t rapping about shooting and stabbing people?) and dreamed of becoming an architect/brain surgeon/engineer/prime minister (delete as appropriate).
But some people – some horrible cynical, misanthropic people – might have a sneaking suspicion that this drill rapper’s recent departure from this earth has improved the quality of the population in the part of London/Mogadishu where he used to live.
Meanwhile in Bradford, four young men in a BMW died at around 05.00 in the morning a couple of days ago while being followed by an unmarked police car. Given that we haven’t been quickly told that the men were “white” and given that there are very few white people left in lovely Bradford, we can possibly assume that the four young men were in some form or other members of the multi-cultural enriching community. I’ve just seen pictures of the four young men who died and their names – definitely the best kind of multi-cultural enrichers!
The IOPC (Independent Office for Police Conduct) regional director Miranda Biddle said: “This is a most tragic incident and our sympathies are with the family and friends of those who have died”. And once again, I’m sure we’ll be told by the mainstream media that all four were wonderful boys who loved their mums, did social work in their free time (when they weren’t causing havoc for law-abiding citizens?) and dreamed of becoming architects/brain surgeons/engineers/prime ministers (delete as appropriate).
But some people – some horrible cynical, misanthropic people – might have a sneaking suspicion that these four young men’s departure from this earth in their (or someone else’s?) BMW at 05.00 in the morning (when most normal people are in bed getting some rest before another hard day’s work) has improved the quality of the population in whatever part of Bradford they used to live.
And here’s the newly freed Tommy Robinson talking about how he was treated while in prison for daring to point out that most members of Britain’s child rape gangs are from the same ethnic background as our shiny new Home Secretary. In it Tommy Robinson reveals, amongst other things, that he couldn’t open his cell window during the hot weather otherwise prisoners from the multi-cultural-enriching community would hurl excrement through his cell window.
Fortunately Mr Robinson’s lawyers managed to free him by exposing what a sham his imprisonment was otherwise a cynic might be tempted to suspect that our ‘Asian’ Home Secretary was rather hoping that the multi-cultural enriching prisoners would do a ‘Kevin Crehan’ on Tommy Robinson and then the prison authorities would claim that Tommy Robinson’s death was (like Kevin Crehan’s) “unexplained”:
Wonderful news – British justice has actually been done and Tommy Robinson has been freed. Moreover, the Court of Appeal found that:
* Tommy should not have been put on trial that same day
* Tommy’s lawyer did not have proper time to prepare his case
* the judge in Leeds never clearly presented what Tommy had allegedly done wrong
* the judge did not watch the entire video of Tommy, that supposedly was proof of his contempt
* the judge did not follow the criminal procedure rules
* the sentence was disproportionate; and
* Tommy’s treatment in prison was inappropriate
Basically, the whole court case and sentencing of Enemy of the State, Tommy Robinson, was an Establishment stitch up which broke British law and was more like something we would expect from Mugabe’s Zimbabwe than once great Britain.
Oh dear Sajid Javid. It seems that your cunning plan to silence someone who dared mention the fact that many child rapist gangs are, like yourself, of Pakistani Moozerlum background has backfired. I imagine you and the rest of the Establishment were rather hoping that, like Kevin Crehan, Tommy Robinson would mysteriously die in prison and then soon be forgotten. Well, that didn’t happen. Though no doubt Mr Javid and the Establishment will have a new plan for silencing Mr Robinson.
My latest book
Now comes the big test – how much do readers value my modest contributions to human knowledge?
My latest book “THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON” has just been published. You can buy it on amazon.co.uk for a mere £7.99 paperback (£2.99 Kindle ebook) by clicking on the “buy at amazon” just under the thumbnail of the front cover to your right.
About 30 years ago, around 770,000 people (1 in 6 school-leavers) attended a university or polytechnic. Now there are over 2.3 million students in Higher Education (about half of school-leavers).
For the last 30 years we’ve been told that ‘the more people go to Uni, the better off we’ll all be’.
But is this true? Has the huge growth in the number of people going to Uni – the Great University Expansion – really been the success the politicians and universities would have us believe?
After all, what’s the point of having a degree if one in every two people has one? And why get a degree if only a small minority of university graduates – on some courses less than 1 in 10 – will find graduate jobs, especially if many graduates leave Uni with debts of up to £60,000?
In “THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON” we expose the truth behind the massive expansion of Britain’s university sector: • pressure on school-leavers to get to Uni whether they are likely to benefit or not • schools gaming the system to send as many pupils to Uni as possible • universities lowering entrance standards to fill up their ever-increasing numbers of courses • dumbing down of university courses • falling academic standards as lecturers no longer have time to deal with increasing numbers of students • universities avoiding failing anyone, however poor their work, as they’ve paid so much for their degrees • graduates with unrepayable debts which will have to be picked up by taxpayers • a massive oversupply of graduates compared to available job opportunities • a university sector that has become huge, bureaucratic and self-serving and which is too often a burden on, rather than a benefit to, the country.
A university degree will be the second most expensive thing most people will now buy. But is it still worth it? Or are today’s students the victims of a massive cynical mis-selling scandal by politicians and universities, that will not get them the graduate jobs they have been promised, but still leave them with a lifetime of debt?
I imagine all my readers will know people at university or planning to go to university. Or else they’ll know families whose children are at or hoping to go to Uni. So, why not buy a copy of “THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON”? You all know someone who really should read it!
Cressida – we love you
And now for something completely different – here’s my personal tribute to the incredible superwoman and big boss of the London Met Police, Cressida Dick, that I wrote and had someone produce for me. Enjoy:
David Craig, on August 12th, 2018
