Snouts in the Trough

Rejoice, rejoice! Let us all rejoice! London, Britain’s most ethnically diverse city, has just elected a M*sl*m mayor. And he hasn’t got a beard, so he must be a ‘moderate’. (Though he has some fairly dodgy friends, so may not be quite as moderate as the Burkha Broadcasting Corporation and other media like to claim)

Below is a table showing the change in the ethnic make-up of London between the 2001 and 2011 censuses:

What do we notice?

British in a minority

The number of white British has dropped by 618,577. Over 60,000 white British have left London every year for the 10 years up to 2011. Assuming this has continued since 2011, around one million white British have fled from London since 2001. Interestingly, the number of white Irish has also declined. This is an exodus of almost biblical proportions. Ooops, the lovers of cultural diversity perhaps forgot to tell us of the scale of this ‘white flight’? The % of white British in London fell from about 60% in 2001 to 45% by 2011 and is now probably below 38%. White British are in an ever-shrinking minority in their own capital city. No wonder London voted Labour.

By the time Mr Khan comes up for re-election, less than one in three Londoners will be white British. This suggests Mr Khan will be in office for an awfully long time.

The EU influx

One of the groups with the biggest rise has been ‘white other’. They’ve shot up by 439,087 – about 40,000 arriving every year. I think we can assume most of these are fleeing low wages or even unemployment in the EU. Who are they going to vote for? Labour naturally. And these are just the ones we know about. There are probably a couple of hundred thousand more who are here illegally.

The rise of the M*sl*ms

The number of M*sl*ms (Pakistani, Bangladeshi and Arab) has shot up by 255,302 from 296,642 in 2001 to 551,944 by 2011 – an increase of 25,000 every year. Assuming this has continued since 2011, there are probably at least 700,000  M*sl*ms in London. Though, if we include ‘other Asian’ then there are over one million M*sl*ms in London. And who will the M*sl*m block vote plus the postal vote fraud go to? Labour’s Mr Khan, of course.

Towards a bright *sl*mic future

With the Tories’ plans for mayors in more cities, we’re going to see an acceleration of the M*sl*m takeover of our country.

So, is Khan’s victory a triumph for diversity? Or is it actually due to the white ethnic population fleeing from the foreign invasion of their country?

I fear it’s more the latter, rather than the former.

And if you know any builders who specialise in mosques, they’re going to be very busy over the next few years.

How they must be celebrating in Raqqa as we allow the invasion of our country while committing cultural, economic, military and political suicide in the name of political correctness!

I’ve written before about how when New Labour first came to power in 1997, the NHS had about 210,000 hospital beds and 25,000 managers (8 beds per manager). By the time New Labour lost to the Coalition, there were in the region of 150,000 hospital beds and 43,000 managers (3.5 beds per manager):

Since the Coalition took power, the number of managers has started falling and is now at around 38,000. So the number of beds per manager has gone up slightly over the last few years.

But it’s not just the ever-increasing numbers of managers that are killing our public services, it’s the managers’ ethics (or rather lack of any ethics) that is so destructive. Just one example from my own experience.

Britain’s most expensive car park?

A few years ago I was an elected governor of my local NHS hospital trust. I became concerned at the £5.3m cost of a relatively small multi-storey car park being built for the hospital. I did a little research and found that the hospital was paying about £7,800 per parking space whereas for similar car parks built for shopping centres the cost was nearer £5,000 per parking space.

I had a contact in the company building the car park and he confirmed that the hospital was paying over £100 per square foot for its car park, whereas a shopping centre would only be paying around £70 per square foot. So the hospital car park should have only cost around £2.94m and not the £5.3m the hospital was paying.

The ‘cover pricing’ scam

Around that time, the Office for Fair Trading (OFT) completed an investigation into how construction companies were fleecing the public sector. The investigation revealed that the main construction companies had formed a cartel that decided which company would win each public-sector project. That company would put in an over-priced bid and then a few others would put in even higher bids to give the public-sector buyers the impression that there was real competition when, in fact, the whole bidding process had been fixed from the start.

The OFT fined a few companies about £129.5m. The company which got the largest fine happened to be the very same company building the hospital car park

I don’t want to know

Quite pleased with what I found, I took my results to the hospital chief executive and explained that the hospital could claim over £1m back from the construction company. I was, as far as I could see, being a pretty effective elected governor. However, the reaction of hospital management was something akin to horror. I guess I had shown them up to be fools and dupes who had wasted a rather large lump of the hospital’s money and my findings could have been damaging to their precious, well-paid, extremely well-pensioned careers. So, I was informed in writing that by exposing the the car park ‘cover pricing’ scam I had gone outside the “auspices of the role defined for a governor” and the whole matter was quickly swept under the carpet.

With managers in today’s public sector, there’s little to no sense of public service. Most executives and managers are only in the public sector because you don’t have to be particularly talented to rise to the top and because of the rewards – risk-free easy job for life, good salary, massive pension with opportunities for early retirement with an enormous tax-free lump-sum payoff.

Inconsistent, inexperienced and incompetent

At a conference of suppliers of IT systems to the public sector, one executive of a large computer company laughingly explained that his company made huge amounts of money from their public-sector contracts because public-sector buyers were “inconsistent, inexperienced and incompetent”.

He certainly got that right. Though perhaps he should have also added “self-serving”?

Enjoy this gem!!!

Donald Trump has just made his first speech on the foreign policy he would pursue if he becomes president. Look at the ridiculous things he is suggesting:

1. He would put American interests first. That’s crazy! Our David Cameron always puts the interests of his EU bosses above those of the British people

2. He would pressure NATO countries to meet their agreed targets of 2% of GDP spent on defence. The man’s an idiot! Most NATO countries would prefer to give billions in ‘foreign aid’ to the most corrupt hell-holes in the world rather than investing in defending their own citizens

3. He would seek to build bridges with Russia. That’s lunacy! Doesn’t Trump realise that Obama and Cameron are desperate to increase tensions with Russia in order to pretend that Russia is our enemy when, in fact, Russia should be our ally against our common enemy – Islam? Moreover, Trump is so stupid that he apparently believes that the Cold War is over and that it has been replaced by the ‘civilisational war’ between developed democratic countries and the Islamic fundamentalism that is intent on Islam taking over the world

4. He would face down China and stop China destroying the few American manufacturing jobs that are left. Bonkers! Our European leaders are deliberately destroying Western manufacturing jobs making those jobs move to China due to Europe’s ever-increasing energy costs as our deluded rulers fight the war against non-existent man-made global warming

5. He would stop destroying countries (Syria, Libya etc) that had no experience of and no wish for Western-style democracy in order to impose Western-style democracy. That’s absurd! Cameron wants to bomb any country he believes isn’t ‘democratic’.

6. He would stop “importing extremism through senseless immigration policies”. Waaayyyycccciiiissssttt! In Europe we want as many M*sl*ms as possible to come to our countries and turn them into backward, violent, crime-ridden, Third-World sh*tholes. In fact, our rulers are actively working towards making M*sl*ms a majority by 2050 as they turn once great and civilised Europe into poverty-stricken, backward, violent Eurabia

Hopefully, readers can now see that Donald Trump is totally off his rocker while our rulers are wonderful geniuses leading us all towards a great future?