|
||||||
|
By  David Craig, on June 29th, 2016We all know that *sl*m is the Religion of Peace:
So, tiny Israel must be guilty of all the slaughter and mayhem in the Middle East:
Unfortunately, many leading M*sl*ms don’t understand that their religion is peaceful:
I wonder why they don’t understand their own religion:
By David Craig, on June 28th, 2016The EU in/Out Referendum may have distracted us slightly from the greatest threat to Western civilisation. So, as a reminder of the perils we face, here’s a shortish (9 minutes) video about the “Four Phases of *sl*mic Conquest”. Enjoy! https://vimeo.com/52771987 By David Craig, on June 27th, 2016Whatever happens in Britain now – from a worldwide economic slowdown to rain at Wimbledon – will be blamed on we 17 million people who voted to get out of the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic, totalitarian EU. For example, there probably will be a slowdown in business investment for a while. But against that we may (providing we’re not forced to vote again to get the ‘right answer’) get back our freedom. And as they say, many business bosses know the cost of everything but the value of nothing. How do you put a value on democracy and freedom? For months or even years to come, sneering members of the elites will be all over the media accusing us ignorant, unwashed plebs for causing disaster by disobeying the orders of our superiors. So, let’s just take a moment to remember all the things we can avoid by leaving the rotten, failing EU empire:
At the moment, all those in the sinking EU-boat are mocking us, shouting insults at us and threatening us. But in a couple of years (providing we are ever actually allowed to leave the EUSSR), we’ll realise that getting out of the EU-disaster was the best thing we ever did:
By David Craig, on June 25th, 2016(Weekend blog) I’m still struggling to believe that we succeeded, that the British peasants revolted, stood up to the corrupt, self-serving elites and voted for freedom rather than serfdom. Incredible! Hopefully this Peasants Revolt will spread across Europe. But the most important place where the peasants could revolt against the elites is in the US. You may not like Donald Trump. And he may not be quite as wealthy as he claims. But he seems to be the only American political leader who will stand up for ordinary people against the rotten, money-grabbing, lying elites. I don’t know enough about American politics to write anything intelligent or original. So instead, here’s the American conservative political commentator Pat Buchanan explaining how Donald Trump might manage to beat corrupt, Wall Street- and Saudi-funded establishment stooge Hillary Clinton: Stripped of its excesses, Donald Trump’s Wednesday speech contains all the ingredients of a campaign that can defeat Hillary Clinton this fall. Indeed, after the speech ended Clinton was suddenly defending the Clinton Foundation against the charge that it is a front for a racket for her family’s enrichment. The specific charges in Trump’s indictment of Clinton: She is mendacious, corrupt, incompetent and a hypocrite. “Hillary Clinton … is a world-class liar,” said Trump. She faked a story about being under fire at a Bosnia airport, the kind of claim for which TV anchors get fired. She has lied repeatedly about her email server. She lied to the families of victims of the Benghazi massacre by implying the atrocity was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video, not the premeditated act of Islamist terror she knew it to be. Drop “world-class” and Trump’s case is open and shut. His second charge: “Hillary has perfected the politics of personal profit and theft” and “may be the most corrupt person ever to seek the presidency.“ Particulars? Bill Clinton got $750,000 for a speech from a telecom company facing State Department sanctions for providing technology to Iran. The Clintons got the cash; the telecom company got no sanctions. “Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while 9 investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.” Trump added, “She ran the State Department like her own personal hedge fund — doing favors for oppressive regimes … for cash.” Together, she and Bill have raked in $153 million since 2001 in speaking fees from “lobbyists, CEOs and foreign governments.” These figures are almost beyond belief. Sherman Adams had to resign as Ike’s chief of staff for accepting a vicuna coat from Bernard Goldfine, who had problems with federal regulators. When ex-President Reagan, after brain surgery, visited Japan to receive that nation’s highest honor, The Grand Cordon of the Supreme Order of the Chrysanthemum, and got a $2 million fee from the media company that hosted his nine-day visit, our liberal editorial pages vomited out their revulsion and disgust. Where are those media watchdogs today? Rather than condemning the Clintons’ greed, their conflicts of interest and their egregious exploitation of their offices, the media are covering for Hillary and digging for dirt on Trump. To substantiate his charge of incompetence, Trump notes that Clinton as Senator voted for arguably the greatest strategic blunder in U.S. history, the invasion of Iraq. She pushed the attack that ousted Col. Gadhafi and unleashed terrorists who took over much of Libya and murdered our ambassador. She played a leading role in launching the insurrection against Bashar Assad that has left hundreds of thousands dead, uprooted half of Syria and sent millions of refugees to seek asylum in Europe. Primary beneficiary: ISIS, with its capital in Raqqa. And the hypocrisy charge? Though Hillary and Bill Clinton profess to be the fighting champions of women’s equality and gay rights, they have banked millions in speaking feels and tens of millions in contributions to the Clinton Foundation from Islamic regimes under whose rule women are treated as chattel and homosexuals are flogged, beheaded and stoned to death. Why do major media let them get away with such hypocrisy? While making the case for the indictment of Hillary Clinton, Trump also outlined an agenda with appeal not only to nationalists, populists and conservatives but working-class and minority Democrats. If Trump is elected, an economic system “rigged” to enable big corporations to leave and take factories and jobs abroad, and bring their goods back free of charge to kill companies that stay in America, will end. “Globalism” will be replaced by “Americanism”. Trade and tax policies will be rewritten to provide incentives for companies to bring jobs and factories here. Was this not also Bernie Sanders’ message? He stood against NAFTA in the 1990s when the Clintons colluded with Bush Republicans to impose it. In his peroration, Trump spoke of what we Americans had done, how we had lost our way, but how we could, together, make her great again. His finale was surprisingly aspirational, hopeful, inclusive. In the political year just ended, several unmistakable messages have been delivered. First, the record turnout for Trump and remarkable turnout for Ted Cruz represented a repudiation of Beltway Republicanism. Second, the amazing success of 74-year-old Socialist Bernie Sanders in keeping Clinton embattled until California, showed that the Democratic young have had enough of Clintonism. A majority of the nation said loud and clear: We want change. Hillary Clinton’s vulnerability is that Americans distrust her; no one believes she represents change; and she has no agenda and no vision. Her campaign for president is all about her. As Trump noted, even her slogan is, “I’m with her.” Rough and raw as it was in parts, Donald Trump’s speech on Wednesday contains the elements of a campaign that can win. And here’s Trump reacting to the British vote as he explains that in Britain, just as in America, ordinary, decent people want their country back:
By David Craig, on June 24th, 2016Today I don’t know what to write. With the whole worldwide establishment – useless windbag Obama, the repulsive George Soros, plundering Goldman Sachs, rotten JP Morgan, Goldmans Sachs’ Mark Carney, Adolf Merkel, Dr Strangelove Schauble etc etc – threatening Britain with disaster if we dared vote for freedom, the British people once again stood tall and defied the forces of totalitarianism. We (apart from the benefits-dependent Scots and Northern Irish, of course) voted for freedom! In this extraordinary battle between David (ordinary people) versus Goliath (the establishment elites), the score seems to be David – 1: Goliath – 0. By voting for freedom, we’ve given a lead to ordinary people across Europe. We’ve given them an example that they too can dare to defy their lying, self-serving rulers and break free of sclerotic, stifling EU ‘animal farm’ totalitarian control:
Watch with joy as people across Europe follow our lead in demanding their freedom from economic and political oppression. I’d like to congratulate my small band of readers. Hopefully we all did our bit to move the vote towards escaping the toxic oppression of corrupt, wasteful Brussels bureaucrats controlled by a German attempt at creating a Fourth Reich. But now we need to watch our rulers like hawks. We voted for freedom. But will they give it to us? Or will they find ways to punish us worthless plebs for our insolence and disobedience? Will they find ways of blocking our escape from the EUSSR? Will they force us to vote again and again till we get the “right answer” as they have done in other countries? We voted for freedom. But sadly the battle for freedom is just beginning. Our rulers will try every trick they can think of to deny us our liberation. But at least today we can celebrate. Once again Britain has started to liberate Europe from becoming just a part of an oppressive, undemocratic new German empire. FREEDOM!!!!!!!!By David Craig, on June 23rd, 2016In the 1975 EU Referendum, we were told we were just part of a “Common Market”. They lied to us. The “Common Market” became the “European Community” and then the “European Community” became the “European Union” as part of a massive political project whereby the European elites grabbed ever more power for themselves as they built their dream – one massive, corrupt, undemocratic Superstate, the United States of Europe. The elites lied to us then. They are lying to us now as they try to frighten us into submission. Below is a video of Labour’s Peter Shore warning us in 1975 to leave the EU and to regain control over our country. It seems nothing has changed during the last 41 years. The Remain campaign is still using “fear, fear, fear” to cower us into servile obedience to our rulers and trick us into handing control of our country to corrupt, self-serving bureaucrats under the control of Germany. Please, don’t get fooled again! What Shore said in 1975 is as relevant today as it was then. We must vote LEAVE! This is our last chance for freedom! Make today “Independence Day”! Vote LEAVE!The video is only about 3 minutes long and is worth watching to the end:
By David Craig, on June 22nd, 2016(Today, I’m doing two blogs. For my first blog, I have just lazily copied an article in yesterday’s Times. It’s by Melanie Phillips the writer of Londonistan – a book about the rise of radical *sl*m in Britain. In her article I particularly liked her line about how Britain had become “an infantilised dependency culture. A dismaying number now believe Britain is too weak to go it alone in the world”.) Here’s her article: In the 1975 referendum the former prime minister Edward Heath, who had taken Britain into the European Economic Community (the EU’s precursor) two years previously, claimed membership would have no effect on British sovereignty. The EEC was purely an economic arrangement, he insisted, and we couldn’t prosper outside it. I thought these claims ranged from deeply misleading to outright lies. It was the first time I was old enough to vote and I ticked the box to leave. I was dismayed that the British people voted to maintain the anti-democratic status quo. Now we have reached that point of decision once again. The EU has metastasised into a full-blown superstate project. In the intervening years, the damage it has done to core British industries such as fishing, its crippling effect on Britain’s economic bedrock of small businesses and its increasing subjugation of domestic to European law have steadily ratcheted up public fury. In addition, the EU’s founding principle of the free movement of people makes it impossible for Britain to control its immigration levels. To take the biscuit, anyone voicing such concerns has been damned as a Little Englander xenophobic racist troglodyte imbecile. The many millions who have thus had these anxieties dismissed and traduced by the entire political class are now spitting tacks over the threats, scares and sheer contempt for ordinary people issuing from Remain. There are nevertheless many who, bombarded by claim and counter-claim, remain deeply uncertain how to vote. Not surprising: this is a most complex issue with profound and valid points on both sides. Some of Remain’s arguments cannot be dismissed. It is right to warn that Brexit would cause turbulence and difficulties. Financial markets hate uncertainty and the pound would almost certainly fall. The legal complexities of disentangling the UK from all its European agreements would be formidable. We don’t know what kind of trade deals the UK would secure, or with whom. This turbulence, however, will in due course ease. In the longer term I believe it cannot possibly be in the UK’s financial interests, despite being outside the euro, to be tied into the EU’s sclerotic and failing protectionist economic system predicated on stamping out competitiveness among member states. In any event, the issue for me that trumps all the rest is the ability to govern ourselves. I don’t believe for a moment that the UK, the world’s fifth-largest economy, will fail to prosper outside the EU. In the last analysis, however, I’d rather be poor and free than rich and enslaved. The prevalent impulse to “keep hold of nurse for fear of finding worse” shows the extent to which the UK has become an infantilised dependency culture. A dismaying number now believe Britain is too weak to go it alone in the world. Without independent self-government, however, there can be no democracy. We will increasingly become, as the EU intends, a regional province of a chimerical empire that has no cultural coherence or legitimacy but represents merely the desire to control all under its bureaucratic thumb. The absence of self-government has already had a corrosive effect on parliament, where MPs have lost power and authority due to the steady encroachment of EU laws and regulations. This political decline has been deepened by the belief that nations are intrinsically threatening because they are governed by self-interest. The only legitimate institutions are transnational and thus supposedly committed to peace, love and the brotherhood of man. Such EU faux-universalism has helped undermine the building blocks of our society by promoting the notion that all cultures have identical value, self-designated victim groups must be indulged in their illiberal demands and that war is worse than enslavement. This presents acute dangers for Britain’s defences. It’s not just the implications of uncontrolled migration. Nor that, as Field Marshal Lord Guthrie and other top brass have warned, the proposed EU army would undercut Nato, the real bastion of Europe’s security. It’s also that people will only fight to defend their own nation, with which they patriotically identify on account of its history, culture and institutions. No one would willingly fight and die for Brussels. With so many in Europe similarly enraged by political powerlessness, Brexit might have a domino effect and cause the EU to break up altogether. Remainers say this would risk a return to war between nations and the possible resurgence of fascism. It’s true that the European project’s foundational aim was to contain German militarism. Times, though, have changed and Germany is now a democracy. Moreover, the EU is itself fuelling the rise of neo-fascist parties capitalising on the way it rides roughshod over national interests. If European free societies are to defend themselves against their enemies, whether from the Islamic world, Russia or the Far East, this will only be done by sovereign nations fighting for their own future in alliance with other such nations. Britain’s historic record of inventing and defending liberty and democracy, not to mention the strength of its economy, mean that this week’s vote gives it the chance not only to become again a democratic nation but to put itself at the head of the defence of Europe. Freedom or serfdom? That’s the choice on Thursday that faces us all. By David Craig, on June 22nd, 2016(I’m writing two blogs today. Here’s the second one) There are some great comments on my blog yesterday. You just click on the title to read them. Perhaps this was the best one: British hate preacher Anjem Choudary – who is currently facing charges of supporting Islamic State – has told Breitbart London that he thinks the United Kingdom should stay in the European Union . “If you want my view on it, I think Britain will be worse off,” Mr. Choudary (pictured above) told Breitbart London. “I think that [leaving the EU] is something that is probably not in our advantage from a Muslim perspective,” he added. The radical preacher rose to prominence as the head of Al-Muhajiroun and then Islam4UK – both banned Salafist groups – and for his provocative anti-Western views. He has praised 9/11 terrorists as “magnificent martyrs”, wants to see “Sharia dominate the world”, the “flag of Sharia” fly over Parliament, and advocates a so-called caliphate. In 2013, Mr. Choudary stated: “As Muslims, we reject democracy, we reject secularism, and freedom, and human rights. We reject all of the things that you espouse as being ideals”. By David Craig, on June 21st, 2016Once again, we are being threatened by Germany’s rulers. They have promised to punish us if we dare to leave their latest attempt at ruling the whole of Europe:
In case you haven’t seen it, here’s the latest short (2 minute) video from the Leave campaign asking you – are you too chicken to vote LEAVE?
By David Craig, on June 20th, 2016As we move into the last days before the EU In/Out referendum, here’s a delightful story of multi-culturalism from a local Bradford newspaper that you’re unlikely to see in the national mainstream media. It’s about how an underage British girl was repeatedly raped and sodomised by around 100 “Asian” men. I think we all know that “Asian” doesn’t mean Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Confucians etc. And “Asian” doesn’t mean Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Korean etc. The national media won’t report this story as it might lead to some people voting to leave the EU before 79 million “Asian” Turks get the right to move to the rapists’ paradise of Benefits Britain. Here’s the story – it’s a pretty familiar one as exactly the same thing has been happening for over 15 years in almost every British town or city with a large “Asian” population: TWO MEN from Bradford are among 15 who have received jail sentences totalling over 160 years for sexual abuse of a vulnerable schoolgirl. The jail terms imposed on Khalid Zaman and Mohammed Ramzan could not previously be reported in case of prejudice at a series of trials at Leeds Crown Court. Judge Geoffrey Marson QC had already jailed the pair and 11 other men for raping or abusing the same girl from Halifax when she was aged between 13 and 15 and today jailed two others for sex offences against her and another man for supplying the girl with cannabis bringing the total sentences imposed to 169 years four months.
During the trials, the court heard the schoolgirl was preyed on by as many as 100 men, the majority of them of Asian origin, during a two year period. Some took advantage because they saw her as vulnerable, others because word got round she was available. The prosecution described her as “lonely, needy” and seeking friendship and love, a teenager who for a long time did not understand that she was a victim of child abuse being groomed and exploited. Michelle Colborne QC prosecuting told one trial: “Under the effects of drink or drugs she let them have sex with her or was so intoxicated she could not say No.” “She was a child who has no memory of the first time she had sex such is the extent of the exploitation.” Juries at four separate trials heard how the schoolgirl was 13 when her mother died after a long illness, by which time she had already got used to fending for herself, sometimes in a house with no electricity or food. Her father subsequently formed a new relationship and moved out for a time leaving her only with a sister or home alone. She fell into a chaotic lifestyle and was recorded as vulnerable at school when she turned up wearing makeup and was seen associating with older youths. By February 2010, her school attendance was only 37 per cent and because of increasing concerns for her welfare the following month she was referred to social services not by her father but by the school after admitting to staff she was habitually getting drunk. She also disclosed she was spending time with girls who were being given cannabis by Asian men and said she would cruise in cars with men at night but would not say who they were. When months later she eventually did open up about what was going on she revealed she had starting drinking vodka at the People’s Park in Halifax at the age of 12. In early 2011 a police officer co-ordinating missing persons in Calderdale recorded she was potentially a victim of child sexual exploitation because she kept being reported missing and returning drunk or under the influence of drugs, but would not disclose to him who was responsible for giving her them. In spite of the attempts to help her while living with her father and his partner, she would still go missing after slipping out to meet men who she thought were her friends but who were really interested only in using her for their own sexual gratification. In March that year as part of a risk assessment into her situation she disclosed she was drinking three to four bottles of vodka a week. She also described taking illicit substances including Mcat, cannabis, Ecstasy, cocaine and amphetamines. She said she had had a fit the previous week and believed her drink had been spiked. Throughout the hearing her mobile phone had been ringing continuously but she did not confide about her sexual life. Days later she was found by police inebriated in the early hours of the morning and said she had consumed vodka, Sambuca, a bottle of Southern Comfort and some cocaine. She would regularly go cruising with men in cars at night and some of those who exploited her took her to hotels where she was raped by more than one man, but still refused to talk about what was really happening. She once rang the missing person police co-ordinator to collect her from outside a Bradford hotel but claimed to have been alone all night. That April her father found her mobile phone had sexually explicit messages on it indicating involvement with a number of men. Police and social workers tried once again to get her away from her molesters and she was sent to temporary foster care in another town nearby but once again she continued to go missing and stay out overnight returning hungover and sometimes with injuries and love bites. By the time she was 15 when she was finally moved in July completely away from the Halifax area in a desperate effort to break the cycle of abuse, she tested positive for sexually transmitted disease. It was only then, away from the influence of her abusers, that she finally began to see she had been groomed and exploited and began to open up to her foster mother and to the police about her life and who was responsible. She described being taken to houses in Bradford as well as Halifax, to hotels in Bradford, Leeds and London and to a drug dealer’s big house in Manchester, sometimes being given money but mostly drugs and alcohol. She identified the Campanile hotel, off the M606 in Bradford, as somewhere she had been take to for sex with men and said she was once filmed on a mobile phone being orally raped although that was later deleted. Many of her abusers she only knew by nicknames or no name at all. Some were identified from CCTV which had been seized from the hotels she could remember, while others were caught because of DNA from stains on her clothing. Jailing the four convicted of the most serious offences, Judge Marson described her as a deeply damaged child. “She was given alcohol, drugs and money for sex. There was no love, no affection, no care. She was taken advantage of when she was drunk and under the influence of drugs,” he said. She did not remember the first time she had sex but believed she had been with over 100 men between the age of 13 and 15. “Often more than one a day and once about 19 men.” She was subjected to humiliation and degradation “at the hands of men who used and abused her for their own sexual gratification. It must have been obvious to anyone who came into contact with her that she was particularly vulnerable.” He said she had been plied with drink and drugs. “She was sometimes in such a state of intoxication she was incapable of consenting to any form of sexual activity and that would have been obvious to anyone in her company.” She contracted gonorrhoea as a result of her lifestyle, suffers flashbacks of what was done to her and has been diagnosed with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder. “She has been removed away from home and family on a permanent bases. Psychological damage in this case is about as bad as it gets. She will carry this abuse with her for the rest of her life.” He said they were not her only abusers but each man bore some responsibility for the damage inflicted “and not one of you has shown the slightest remorse for what you did.” Those jailed for abusing her included Heder Ali from Cheshire sentenced to 25 years in prison after he was convicted on two charges of rape and two of trafficking her for sexual exploitation. Now 36, with a previous conviction for sexual assault he took her to the Park Hotel in Bradford in the summer of 2011 where she was given alcohol and drugs. “Knowing she was incapable of giving consent you raped her, you took her there knowing not only you would have intercourse with her but other men would.” “It was gross abuse, she was incapacitated by drink and drugs, you knew it and knew how vulnerable she was,” said Judge Marson. Haider Ali, now 41, from Halifax was jailed for a total of 20 years after he was found guilty of sexual activity with a child and causing another person to engage in sexual activity with her without consent. He was 19 years older than the victim when he took her to a flat in Bradford where she said she had sex with him on a sofa after she was given a sachet of some substance which “crackled” in her mouth as well as some drinks which made her feel unwell. Judge Marson said: “Having abused her yourself you then pinned her against the wall and told her she had to sleep with another man as payment for use of the flat and told her if she did not sleep with him she would not get a lift home.” He said she had no money to get home herself. “You said she was not leaving until she had slept with him. That other man, whose identity has not been sufficiently ascertained was standing next to you at the time and had a smile on his face.” “She said she did not want to sleep with him, he took her into a bedroom, locked the door, pinned her arms above her head and raped her.” The court heard he did not wear a condom. Mohammed Ramzan, 35, from Bradford was jailed for 15 years after he was found guilty of oral rape. The jury heard he took the schoolgirl to a shop to buy vodka before booking a room in the Campanile hotel in Bradford leaving her in the car while he did that so no one would suspect she was under age. In the room she drank vodka and took cocaine and after she refused to perform oral sex on him he rang some friends to join him. “While they were there and she was drunk you raped her orally while one of the others recorded it on a telephone.” The judge said it was later deleted “but you knowing it was being recorded continued with the sexual abuse. You subjected her to that humiliation and degradation in front of others and having achieved your own sexual gratification you left her there.” Khalid Zaman, 37 from Bradford, was jailed for 17 and a half years after he was convicted on two charges of rape and supplying the girl with Mcat. He witnessed her being raped by Ramzan, and then raped her himself after she became so incapable having taken more cocaine and alcohol, that she had no recollection of it. “When you had finished with her you simply left her there in that hotel room. You had no feelings or concern for her.” Haaris Ahmed, 32 from Halifax, was jailed for 12 and a half years after he was convicted on two charges of sexual activity with a child. He admitted one offence of supplying her with cannabis. Tauqeer Butt, 31, from Halifax was convicted of four offences of sexual activity with a child and was jailed for 10 years. Tahir Mahmood, 43 from Halifax, was jailed for 11 years after he was convicted on two charges of sexual activity with the schoolgirl and was also found guilty of sexual assault on a second girl. Azeem Subhani, 25, from Halifax was sentenced to nine years in prison after he was convicted of two offences of sexual activity with a child. Mohammed Ali Ahmed, 43, from Halifax was convicted of one offence of sexual activity and was jailed for six and a half years. Amar Ali Ditta 27, from Halifax was jailed for nine years after he was convicted on two charges of sexual activity with a child. Talib Sadiq, 31 from Halifax was found guilty on two charges of sexual activity with a child and was sentenced to eight years in prison. Sikander Malik, 31, of Halifax was jailed for seven years after he was found guilty on one charge of sexual activity with a child. Aftab Hussain, 37 from Halifax, was jailed for six years after admitting two offences of sexual activity with a child. Jailed today were Sikander Ishaq, 31 from Halifax given six years for one offence of sexual activity with a child, Mansoor Akhtar, 25 from Huddersfield jailed for six years after he was convicted of one offence of sexual activity with a child and admitted supplying her with cannabis and Fasil Mahmood, 37 from Halifax convicted on one charge of supplying her with cannabis and jailed for 10 months. Two other men are still to be sentenced in the future for sex offences. Vote LEAVE on 23 June!!!!! |
|
|||||
| Copyright © 2026 Snouts in the Trough - All Rights Reserved | ||||||
