With over 200,000 pieces of Third-World garbage pouring legally into our once great country every year and tens of thousands more rushing in illegally, I’ve tried to imagine what must happen when one of our (usually foreign-born and West-hating) immigration officers interviews some piece of possibly inbred, low-IQ, violent, intolerant, rape-obsessed scum applying for permanent residence in the UK.
Immigration officer: First can you tell me your name?
Interpreter (The would-be Brit has an interpreter because he claims he doesn’t speak any English. Moreover, the interpreter is a man because the migrant has refused a female interpreter as he believes women are as low as pigs and Jews): Mohammed Ali Mohammed Ben Ali
Immigration: And how old are you Mohammed?
Interpreter: He’s 27 (gets interrupted by Mohammed who speaks no English)….what? No, sorry, he’s 17.
Immigration: What year was he born?
Interpreter: (Confers with Mohammed Ali Mohammed Ben Ali) He was born in 1990
Immigration: Oh, well, let’s put down ’17’ then. That makes life easier for all of us (Mohammed nods enthusiastically even though he pretends not to speak or understand English)
Immigration: Which country are you from Mohammed?
Interpreter: Ethiopia (he gets interrupted by Mohammed and then they both confer) He meant ‘Somalia’ (Mohammed shakes his head) No, he meant ‘Iraq’
Immigration: I see. Shall we just put down ‘Syria’ as that will speed things up? (Mohammed nods enthusiastically even though he pretends not to speak or understand English)
Immigration: In which town in Syria did Mohammed live?
(Mohammed and interpreter urgently confer. Both look worried)
Interpreter: He doesn’t remember
Immigration: I understand completely Obviously a child of just 17 exposed to the horrors of war will be severely affected. I’ll just write ‘Damascus’ (Mohammed nods enthusiastically again even though he has never heard of ‘Damascus’)
Immigration: Can you ask Mohammed for his father’s name?
Interpreter: Mohammed
Immigration: No, his father’s name, not his name
Interpreter: His father is also called ‘Mohammed’
Immigration: And his mother’s name?
(Interpreter confers with Mohammed)
Interpreter: Which one?
Immigration: His mother, his father’s wife. What was her name?
Interpreter: Wife
Immigration: Yes, his father’s wife. What was her name?
(Interpreter confers with Mohammed)
Interpreter: His father had four wives. They were all called ‘wife’. His father just pointed at the wife he was talking to and if she didn’t do what she was told he beat her
Immigration: Um, let’s see. I have to write something. How about ‘Beatty’? (Mohammed nods in approval)
Immigration: Can you ask Mohammed if he has ever been a member of a terrorist organisation?
Interpreter: (Confers with Mohammed) What do you mean by ‘a terrorist organisation’?
Immigration: Well, the British National Party or Alternativ fur Deutschland or UKIP
Interpreter: No, Mohammed has only been a member of ISIL and Boko Haram and Al Qaeda
Immigration: So, I’ll just write ‘no’. Well that seems to be it. Mohammed, welcome to Britain. If you go to the Immigration Services Support Office they’ll issue you with residency papers and £500 to keep you going till they can get your benefits organised. Have you any questions?
(Interpreter confers with Mohammed)
Interpreter: Yes, Mohammed wants to know when he can go to school with young English girls and where he can get some shaving equipment. He hasn’t shaved since yesterday and his beard grows very quickly now that he is 17 years old……………………….
Oh, and look at this ludicrous and hideous Darth Vader impersonator from the Glorious Caliphate of Manhcheristan:
Question: “How do you fight a war if you don’t admit you’re at war?”
Answer: “Badly – in fact, you lose”
Hopefully, following the Manchester massacre, all my readers know the proper procedure for reacting:
Step 1: Treacherous Izlumophiliac politicians and police quickly get on TV to announce “our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families” and “we are united, terrorism will never divide us”. We believe their crocodile tears and claims we’re “united against terrorism”
Step 2: Media desperately try to find some heroes, preferably Moozerlum ones, to divert attention away from the attacker and the reason for the attack. One magazine (Cosmopolitan) even used a photo of a Sikh Manchester taxi driver to claim that local Moozerlums were offering free taxi rides to those caught up in the massacre:
Fortunately for Cosmopolitan, their readers are too stupid to know the difference between a Sikh and a Moozerlum.
Step 3: Pointless hashtags appear in the Internet for idiots to gush on
Step 4: Public buildings lit up around the world to show solidarity – those blue, white and red lights are really coming in useful nowadays!
Step 5: Candlelit vigil with a few token Moozlums and with the usual lefty libtard idiots holding banners with messages like “hope not hate”
Step 6: Supposed experts and our treacherous politicians tell us that the “I-love-my-snackbar” yelling murderer has “hijacked Izlum which is a Religion of Peace”. We believe them.
Step 7: Blame the messenger – outpouring of hysterical bile and accusations of “racism” at anyone daring to point out that this attack, like all the others, was carried out in the name of the Religion of Peace, Mayhem and Murder
Step 8: Police quickly raid a few houses and arrest a few people. Police ensure massive media coverage of the arrests. All those arrested are later quietly (no media) released due to lack of evidence
Step 9: Our rulers tell us that we must show our resilience by “going about our normal daily routines as that’s how we can defeat the terrorists”. We believe them.
Step 10: Our rulers promise firm action, but do nothing, secure in the knowledge that people soon forget and life goes on. Meanwhile, every week over 4,000 violent, West-hating, benefits-scrounging, low-IQ, illiterate, deeply criminal, unemployable Third-World scum (more than 200,000 a year) pour over our non-existent borders.
Step 11: Repeat the above when the next Moozerlum massacres yet another bunch of innocents.
So, you now know what to expect and what to do when the next attack and the next attack and the next attack and the next attack…..happen as they inevitably will.
The police claim to be hunting for anyone responsible for the Manchester massacre.
They’ll no doubt try to look incredibly busy for a few days. They may even invite the TV cameras and press photographers to film them dramatically arresting a few people (before quietly letting them go a couple of days later). And after this flurry of activity the politically-supine police will no doubt conclude (in the interests of multi-cultural inter-community harmony) that the perpetrator was a “lone wolf” with “psychological problems” and therefore the attack wasn’t really caused by any particular group in our society and, in fact, could have been carried out by anyone.
This will then allow our rulers to claim that the Manchester massacre “had nothing to do with Izlum” which is (as we all know) “a religion of peace” and that the real problem we must deal with in our society is indigenous British prejudice against all the millions of wonderful folk who have chosen to make Benefits Britain their home.
So, perhaps snouts-in-the-trough can help the police as they hunt (or pretend to hunt?) for those behind the Manchester massacre?
Here are our first suspects:
This bunch of (IMHO) traitors, liars and scum deliberately flooded our country with violent, low-IQ, intolerant, West-hating subhumans in order to “rub the noses of the middle classes in diversity”. The delightful Mr Mandelson is quoted as having said something like “we sent out search parties to get them to come”.
Under these people the number of migrants pouring into Britain went up from about 100,000 a year to around 500,000 a year. The trouble is that the middle classes just fled from the British Third-World cesspit cities the Britain-loathing New Labour government created and so instead New Labour ended up rubbing the noses of ordinary working families in the blood of their own children.
In the above pictures you might notice a certain Mr Burnham – now the well-paid mayor of Manchester. If I remember correctly a few years ago there were many people who believed that the same Mr Burnham covered up the appalling death rate at the Mid-Staffs NHS Trust (something the charming Mr Burnham denies) and so the death toll reached over a thousand before the truth started to seep out. Mr Burnham, of course, emerged from the episode squeaky clean and continued to successfully live his gilded multi-millionaire lifestyle at taxpayers’ expense.
And here are some more suspects:
These people could have stopped the Third-World invasion of our country. Instead they did nothing.
In these pictures you’ll spot a Mrs Theresa May. She was the longest-serving Home Secretary with responsibility for immigration and border control. As we are unfortunately members of the undemocratic, wasteful, utterly corrupt EU Mrs May could not prevent any EU citizens coming to our country. But she could have reduced the number of Third-Worlders from 250,000 a year to the promised “tens of thousands”. But Mrs May seems to have done nothing.
However, snouts-in-the-trough believes there were even more people involved in this conspiracy to destroy Britain and cause the “rivers of blood” Enoch Powell so accurately predicted.
Here are some more suspects:
I believe (and this is just my very humble opinion, M’lud) that by crushing anyone who dared to worry about the effect of flooding our country with Third-World trash and by branding anyone who dared mention a possible “clash of cultures” as a “racist” and “bigot”, these people aided and abetted the Manchester massacre.
But these are just my personal (possibly politically-incorrect) opinions M’lud.
How to react to yesterday evening’s Manchester attack?
From our rulers expect:
“Our thoughts are with the victims and their families”
“This had nothing to do with Izlum”
“Izlum is a religion of peace”
“The bomber was a ‘lone wolf’ with psychological problems”
“We are united and terrorists will never succeed in dividing us”
“British Muslums have made a huge contribution to our country”
If we’re lucky, we might even get “It was the Russians trying to influence our election result”
May and Corbyn both visit mosques to show their solidarity with Britain’s ‘oppressed’ Muslums
From foreign political leaders:
“We express our horror and sympathy with the people of Manchester”
Landmark buildings lit up with the British colours – red, white and blue. They should be able to get hold of the lights easily as they would have used them after the French Muslum attacks
“We’re all Mancunians now” even though most of them probably have little idea where Manchester is
From the lefty libtards, BBC and Channel 4:
Hashtags and candlelight vigils
Solidarity ceremonies showing Christians and our Muslim friends “united against hate”
“We have no idea yet who could be responsible”
“We have no information on the reason for the attack”
Some Muslum idiot on TV claiming attacks on Muslums have increased since the bombing and that this is the real problem we need to solve
Blaming the right wing/Nigel Farage/etc/etc/etc for provoking hatred
Claims that rising Islamophobia was actually responsible for the attack
Claims it’s all the fault of white indigenous British for not integrating better with migrants
Loads of z-list celebs desperately getting their names in the media and their faces on TV by their ‘grief-signalling’ as they all try to outdo each other in showing how sad and shocked they are
From me – what else can I write apart from?
“You were warned”
“I told you so”
“Why couldn’t you listen?”
“Ramadan 2017 hasn’t even started yet and here we go again”
“Are our rulers pleased that they have given us Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of blood’ and the blood is that of our children?”
“Did nobody in Manchester’s Muslim community notice one of their members stockpiling explosives, nails, bolts and other bomb-making equipment? Did anyone think of reporting this to the police?”
If our politicians’ “thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their families” why have they allowed 5 million often low-IQ, inbred, intolerant, violent, West-hating subhumans to come to Benefits Britain and why do they brand anyone who dares protest against this invasion and takeover of our country as a “racist” and “bigot”?
“When will anyone admit that we are at war, that this is a clash of civilisation versus backwardness and that you can only win a war by recognising who your enemy is and by obliterating them?”
“If this proves to be an Islamic-inspired terrorist attack; will every mosque in the UK start a fund-raising effort for the victims who have been killed or maimed in the name of their God? This would allow all those millions of supposedly ‘moderate Muslims’ living in Britain to actively show their love of all humanity”.
One London borough has just found (to their astonishment) that more than 20% of infant deaths between 2008 and 2016 were due to the parents being closely related.
A never-spoken-about problem with our ‘Asian’ friends is their inbreeding as a result of their long and deeply-ingrained practice of marrying first cousins — a practice that has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses.
In 2005, Labour MP Anne Cryer called for first-cousin marriages to be banned. Then in 2008, the UK’s environment minister Phil Woolas again sounded the alarm about this “very sensitive” issue that is “rarely debated”. Referring to the culture of arranged marriages between cousins in the ‘Asian’ immigrant community, Woolas said: “If you have a child with your cousin the likelihood is there’ll be a genetic problem.”
Woolas, whose views are supported by medical experts, said most cases occur in immigrant families from rural Pakistan, where up to half of all marriages involve first cousins. Woolas said: “If you talk to any primary care worker they will tell you that levels of disability among the . . . Pakistani population are higher than the general population. And everybody knows it’s caused by first cousin marriage.”
The problem is made worse by generational inbreeding. As Woolas put it, “Many of the parents themselves and many of the public spokespeople are themselves products of first cousin marriages”. That would explain why research for BBC2’s Newsnight in November 2005 showed that British Pakistanis accounted for just 3.4% of all births but 30% of all ‘British’ children with recessive genetic disorders.
But the problem isn’t exclusive to our Pakladeshi neighbours as Woolas seems to imply, but is pandemic among Religion of Peaceniks across the world.
According to Nicolai Sennels. a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Religion of Enlightenment inbreeding, close to half of all the religion’s followers in the world are inbred:
70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
63% of Sudanese are inbred.
60% of Iraqis are inbred.
54% of M*sl*ms in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
Sennels points out that cousin marriage was sanctioned by the Prophet and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Religion of Inbreeding. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Religion of Inbreeding world since the Prophet, blessed be His name and from Whom all wisdom comes, is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage. To our Religion of Love friends, any scientific research conducted in the last 1,400 years is irrelevant if it contradicts the teachings of their wonderful book.
Sennels warns that massive inbreeding in M*sl*m culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the M*sl*m gene pool, including extensive damage to M*sl*ms’ intelligence, sanity, and health. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
But perhaps the dead babies were the lucky ones? Below are the consequences of inbreeding in addition to dead babies:
Birth and birth defects:
100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.
50% increase in the risk that the child dies during labor.
The risk of autosomal recessive genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher.
The risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
Physical and mental retardation and illnesses:
The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness, i.e., insanity.
Social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”
Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by 400% among children of cousin marriages.
All of which would explain the following phenomena:
1 out of every 3 Somalis are mentally ill.
More than 40% of the patients in Denmark‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant (i.e., M*sl*m) background.
One-third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a “foreign” (i.e., M*sl*m) background.
In Denmark, psychologist Sennels’ native country, “non-Western” immigrants (who are mainly M*sl*m) are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
In Denmark, M*sl*m children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education.
64% of school children with Arabic parents in Denmark are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of M*sl*ms in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”
The possible average lower IQ of our friends from the One and Only True Religion could mean a lowered ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking, which would explain why:
The Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone did before the economic crash of 2007/8. In the last 1,200 years of *sl*m, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain used to do in a single year.
7 out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Only 9 members of the Religion of Peace have ever won the Nobel Prize, and 5 of those 9 were, of course, for the “Peace Prize”.
According to Naturemagazine, Religion of Tolerance and Harmony countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).
Sennels concludes: “The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of M*sl*m inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.
The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “*sl*mophobe” and a “racist.”
A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the M*sl*m community is accused of whipping up hatred against M*sl*m people.
But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects….
Let us keep in mind that M*sl*ms are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of *sl*m….
In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-M*sl*m”.
Usually our useless, expenses-fiddling MPs are keen to get to get their faces and opinions on TV and in the press. But curiously, when Anna Cryer (2005) and Phil Woolas (2008) mentioned the problem of first-cousin marriages among a certain group in our society, all our other MPs suddenly became invisible.
As for the useless NHS, which is always issuing instructions to us proles on how to live (less alcohol, more exercise, less junk food etc), when asked about the problem of first-cousin marriages, the NHS refused to comment saying only that this was “a matter for local communities”.
Phew! What an exciting week it has been! We’ve had the main political parties launching their election manifestos. You can’t get much more exciting than that, can you?
And look at the enormous differences between the parties’ empty promises! It’s all so incredibly thrilling!
Still, at least there’s one certainty with today’s politicians – they all intend to borrow, borrow, borrow. The Tories propose to borrow lots more money. The Libdems (if they still exist after the election) will borrow much more than the Tories. And Labour will borrow even more than the Tories and Libdems put together. Who could have guessed that?
Assuming the Mighty May sweeps into Downing Street on a wave of public apathy, she proposes to raise £721.1bn in taxes for 2016/17 with the biggest chunk of the money coming from income tax and national insurance:
Although she’s taking in £721.1bn in taxes, thrifty Theresa plans to spend £772.8bn.
In fact, the UK government has run a budget deficit as a norm over the last 60 plus years, as expenditure is higher than tax revenue regardless of which party occupies Downing Street. The budget was last balanced in 2001/2 and has been so in only 8 of the 61 years since 1955.
Our national debt was ‘only’ around £750bn when the hopeless, financially-incontinent, economically-illiterate Gordon Brown was forced screaming and kicking out of Downing Street.
Thanks to Cameron and Osborne’s supposed ‘austerity’ our national debt is now around £1,860bn. This is equivalent to 86.6% of national income in 2016/17 or £62,000 per household. Moreover our debt is rising by about £5,170 per second. Ooops, that’s another £5,170 gone. And another. And another……..
After my book SQUANDERED was published, I wrote an article a few years ago titled something like “If I can save £50bn, why can’t Gordon?”
It’s amazing that we don’t have a single politician who remembers the warning of Dickens’s Mr Micawber.
It’s also amazing, that even though we’re borrowing over £50bn a year, we can afford things like:
– £13bn a year in foreign aid being paid directly into the offshore bank accounts of Africa’s kleptocratic rulers
– £10bn or more being paid each year in benefits and public services to support our rapidly growing Pakladeshi population (see yesterday’s blog)
If you want some fun, you could click on the link below to watch our national debt increasing:
I was so surprised by the figures I came across while researching yesterday’s blog about Pakladesh, that I’d like to continue the Pakladesh theme today.
You thought Africa was a basket case?
I’ve written previously that there is absolutely no need to send any aid to Africa. Why? Three main reasons:
Corruption – the organisation Global Financial Integrity has calculated that Africa’s kleptocratic rulers steal three times as much from their countries each year as their countries receive in aid. So, if we could just cut this looting by half, we could stop all aid to Africa and African countries would still be richer
Stupidity – you may or may not accept the comparative studies of IQs which are less than complimentary about our African friends. But one thing seems certain – IQs are a result of genetics and environment. That means the more complex an environment in which we have to function, the more our IQs will develop.
Overpopulation – there is no drought in Africa. There is no shortage of food or water. There is no necessary poverty. So don’t believe any of the charity begging ads you see on TV and in the press. Africa’s biggest problem is too many people. The population of most African countries doubles every 20 to 25 years. Look at Ethiopia:
It couldn’t support 40 million people when Saint “feckin-give-us-yer-money” Bob did his BandAid thing thirty years ago. So, perhaps Saint Feckin Bob could explain to us how Ethiopia could now be expected to support over 96 million?
Corruption, stupidity and overpopulation – I’d be tempted to call Africa a hopeless basket case, but that would be insulting to baskets. At least baskets have some use.
Welcome to Pakladesh!
But there’s a country whose population is growing even faster than hopeless, worse than basket-case Africa. That country is Pakladesh. Well, it’s not really a country – yet. Though by the end of this century it may well be. Pakladesh is the Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations of Britain’s main cities and towns.
The population of most African countries may be doubling every 20 to 25 years. But the population of Pakladesh is increasing at about 6% or more a year meaning it is doubling every 15 or so years. So, the the time the population of the average African hell-hole doubles, the population of our very own Pakladesh triples. By the time the population of a teeming African cess-pit triples, the population of Britain’s Pakladesh quadruples.
Don’t believe me? Well I’ve done what no mainstream media would ever dare do, I’ve crunched the numbers. Here they are:
The population of Pakladesh succeeds in increasing so rapidly as it is fueled by both high birth rates and by open-door immigration. But the Pakladeshians or Pakladeshis or whatever you want to call them aren’t as stupid as Africans. The Pakladeshians aren’t doubling their population every 15 or so years in an impoverished hell-hole. They’re doubling their population every 15 or so years in a rich European country that can afford to support them. They’re doubling their population every 15 or so years in a country that can apparently afford to pay any Pakladeshian with four wives up to £80,000 a year in tax-free benefits.
So, now you can amaze your friends at the pub by asking which country has the world’s fastest growing population. And once they’ve given their hopelessly uninformed guesses – Somalia, Nigeria, Eritrea, Ghana, India or wherever – you can confidently announce that the country with the world’s fastest growing population is none other than Benefits Britain’s very own Pakladesh.
Yesterday Jeremy Corbyn chose the wonderful city of Bradford to launch the much-leaked Labour Party 2017 election manifesto.
My first reaction watching the launch was one of admiration. As some ridiculous Labour woman earnestly introduced barnstorming Jeremy as “Britain’s next Prime Minister”, I wondered how both she and the Corbyman could keep a straight face.
But I also wondered about some other issues. For example, is the fair city of Bradford still a part of the United Kingdom? Or does it actually resemble a combination of Pakistan and Bangladesh – a new country I’ll call “Pakladesh”?
So I turned to the latest population statistics from the 2011 census:
There’s Bradford at number 12 on the list of districts with the highest level of people that the police and the mainstream media euphemistically call “Asians” when they’re desperate to avoid suggesting that men from a certain religion are responsible for the gang-rape, gang-sodomisation and gang-torture of over 40,000 underage white British girls over the last 15 or so years.
In 2011, two in every three Bradfordians were still white, ethnic British and most of the rest were these “Asians”. So, I suppose we can still call Bradford ‘British’. Though in the ten years between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, the white population of Bradford fell by 13,724 from 366,041 to 352,317 while the “Asian” population shot up by 50,856 from 89,293 to 140,149. I think that by the time of the 2021 census (if the Government dares to carry out a census), we’ll find that white British are in a minority in Bradford and “Asians” are close to being the majority.
So, while Bradford may be classed as part of Britain at the moment, I think we can assume that by around 2021 it will be a majority foreign city – another major Pakladeshian outpost on our fair island. Bradford will soon be a new Newham, Harrow, Redbridge, Tower Hamlets or Slough – areas where a majority are now “Asian” making them closer in ethnic make-up to Karachi or Dhaka than to anything we might think of as Britain:
Incidentally, the white population of Newham fell by 6,914 from 96,130 to 89,216 between the 2001 and 2011 censuses, while the “Asian” population rose by 52,244 from 81,651 to 133,895. I could give you the figures for other Pakladeshian areas, but I think you get the picture by now.
And what are the characteristics of our fast-growing Pakladeshian towns and cities? Thanks to the joys of multi-culturalism, there seems to be evidence that those arriving to live in once-British Pakladesh have brought with them their own charming customs and cultural norms – massive electoral fraud, corruption throughout local government, poverty and benefits dependency, oppression of women, schools that teach children to hate Britain and the West etc etc.
Work? What’s that?
At his launch of his party’s manifesto, the Corby creature took time to praise the enormous contribution that immigrants have made to our country.
Hmmm. Why don’t we dig up some more government statistics to check how great a contribution Corbyn’s migrants are making to our country?
Here are the unemployment figures by main group:
Ah, interesting. It appears that almost half of our friends from Pakladesh (Pakistan and Bangladesh) are in some way allergic to work. But they do seem very much enamoured of our generous benefits system. So, not too much contribution from them. For them, life in Britain consists more of taking rather than giving. For them, to paraphrase JFK, “it’s not a question of what you can give to the country but of how much you can take from it”.
What is ‘diversity’?
We’re constantly being lectured about how we should be encouraging ‘diversity’. But we’re not getting ‘diversity’. By the 2021 census, places like Newham, Harrow, Redbridge, Tower Hamlets and Slough will be majority ‘”Asian”. By the 2051 census, they’ll probably be 80%+ “Asian”. By the end of this century they’ll probably be 95% “Asian” if we allow current trends to continue.
That’s not ‘diversity’, that’s ‘race replacement’.
Here’s a nice picture of successful racial integration from Holland:
Bezoek OBS vinkenbuurt aan moskee Zwolle
Aww, how sweet to see Western children adapting so effortlessly to the future.
And here’s an even nicer picture of successful racial integration from the UK:
It seems that our children are now learning from an early age that they will spend their lives on their knees before their future masters.
And here’s our former Prime Minister in an interview with the Guardian from May 2007 explaining what is happening in our country:
It’s OK to call for the murder of Jews
You’ll probably have seen that Facebook has been taking down websites and video clips in which anyone criticises the Religion of Mayhem and Murder.
But apparently Facebook is quite content to feature videos calling for the extermination of all Jews.
Moreover, Britain has refused entry to several critics of the Religion of Peace and Tolerance. So, no doubt as we further submit ourselves to the invading armies from our favourite religion, the gentleman featured in the video (link below) will soon be preaching his bile at a mosque near you:
I just don’t know what the Israelis are so worried about. During his recent visit to the White House on May 3rd to meet President Donald Trump, Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas said: “Mr. President, I affirm to you that we are raising our children and our grandchildren on a culture of peace.”
There you have it. The Palestinians have no intention of killing all Jews and turning prosperous, fertile, scientifically-advanced Israel into a backward, medieval, excrement-covered hell-hole like most of the countries surrounding Israel.
Here are just a few of those peace-loving Palestinian children:
And here are some more:
And here, to brighten up our rainy Monday morning, is the Palestinian liar-in-chief telling his preposterous whopper and a few of his peace-loving Palestinian children telling us how much they just want to “give peace a chance” (once they’ve killed all the Israelis, of course):
David Craig, on May 26th, 2017
