I’m getting really fed up with weirdos and creeps claiming Britain is becoming an Islamic country. Aren’t you? I bet you are!
For example, I’ve seen this diagram posted somewhere:
This seems to suggest a process by which a non-Islamic country can be turned into an Islamic one. Of course, this is complete nonsense. Nothing like this could ever happen in Britain. That’s obvious, isn’t it?
Horrible people – racists, bigots, Islamophobes, xenophobes, Little Englanders and other such idiots – use all kinds of misleading claims to convince us that Britain is coming under the control of our Muslim friends:
We have open borders and thus uncontrolled immigration, often from Muslim countries, and our rulers try every lie and trick they can think of to avoid taking any action
With current rates of legal and illegal immigration, White British could become a minority in their own country by the 2050s. The fastest growing group are our Islamic friends and neighbours
Pakistani Muslim rape gangs are allowed to rape, beat and torture tens of thousands of White British (often underage) girls with no action from the police or other authorities
Any inquiry into the rape gang phenomenon is repeatedly blocked and delayed by politicians, bureaucrats and police
British religious festivals – Christmas, Easter etc – are downplayed and even abandonned by schools, retailers and other organisations while Islamic festivals are promoted and shoved down our throats
Two-tier Keir’s ‘justice’ system crushes any signs of worry from White British about what is happening to their country while allowing mosque-based hate preachers free rein to spew out their bile and loathing of Britain, the British and the British way of life
Starmer’s government blocks our ally America from using US bases in the UK for any attack to liberate Iran from the mad, murderous ayatollahs in order to avoid upsetting British Muslims who are key parts of the Labour vote
The government has just announced around £45 million for protection of places of worship. Of this about £40 million will go to protecting mosques and just £5 million to protecting churches, synagogues and Hindu temples
There are possibly around 85 Sharia Courts in Britain running an alternative justice system whose judgements are often in conflict with British law. Our politicians and police look the other way and pretend this isn’t happening
Many areas of our cities have become no-go areas for non-Muslims
We now have the beginnings of an Islamic political party in Parliament with some independent MPs seemingly more interested in what is happening in Gaza than in their own constituencies
Ten men from our faviurite religion have just been convicted of setting a mother and daughter on fire in a ‘revenge attack’ following some trivial dispute
Of course, some or all the claims in the above list may be true. But in what-have-the-Romans-done-for-us style I sincerely believe that there is absolutely nothing in the above list which in any way suggests Britain is falling under Islamic control. Yet we have crazy conspiracy theorists – probably the kind of lunatics who don’t believe in man-made Global Boiling and who claim that the Covid vaccines weren’t ‘safe and effective’ – making videos like the one linked below.
I am shocked. I tell you, really shocked. I simply can’t understand how anyone could make a video like this:
Many families from our favourite religion are faced with a difficult choice. When a female member of the family is deemed to have brought shame or dishonour on their family, for example by becoming too ‘Westernised’, wearing immodest clothes or even consorting with anyone from outside their religion, the family needs to decide whether the female should merely receive a good beating, or else be raped multiple times to teach her a lesson or just be killed to save the family’s honour. From the little I understand, the beatings, rapes and murders are carried out by an assortment of brothers, uncles and cousins. So they’re a kind of jolly family affair, a bit like Christmas dinner for us non-Muslims.
It is believed that there is about one ‘honour’ murder in communities of our favorite religion in Britain each month – about 12 a year. Though these are the only ones which are reported. There are indications that the real figure may be much higher as the murders often occur when the girls/women are sent to ‘visit’ their families in countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh and don’t come back to Britain. But many females, who aren’t actually murdered to protect the family’s honour, can get other delightful punishments.
So you don’t think I am being waaacccisssst or Islamophobic or bigotted or intolerant or xenophobic or any such wrong-thought crime of that ilk, I will just quote from the woker than woke, Islamophiliac Guardian newspaper. After all, there’s nothing more tolerant in our mainstream media than our beloved BBC in-house rag – the Guardian newspaper.
In an April 2024 article: the Guardian newspaper informed us that:
The number of “honour-based” abuse offences recorded by English police forces has increased by more than 60% in two years, figures suggest, with concerns voiced that increased polarisation is partly to blame. Data from 26 out of 39 constabularies approached showed that there were 2,594 cases of “honour-based” abuse – which includes forced marriage, rape, death threats and assault – in 2022, compared with 1,599 in 2020.
We’re also told that:
The Metropolitan police, West Midlands and Greater Manchester forces recorded the highest rates of honour-based abuse in 2021 and 2022. Across the two years, the Met recorded 1,213 cases, including 514 cases of violence. There were two attempted murders, 32 rapes, 310 cases of forced marriage and 49 cases of female genital mutilation.
Greater Manchester police’s tally of 729 cases included 42 of rape, 65 assaults causing actual bodily harm, 56 forced marriage offences, 104 of assault and battery and 153 instances of controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. West Midlands recorded 729 cases including 115 of coercive behaviour in an intimate relationship, 27 of rape, 19 forced marriages and 90 threats to kill.
However, given the tendency of the communities, where ‘honour’ punishments happen, to circle the wagons and close ranks when they feel they are being criticised, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to suspect that the real figures of ‘honour’ beatings, rapes and murders may be much higher than the Guardian or our rulers like to admit.
Now, I’m afraid we need to turn to the Daily Telegraph – boo, hiss, fascists, bigots, Nazis.
The Telegraph gives us a hint as to how vigorously our rape-gang-loving police have pursued perpetrators of ‘honour’ crimes:
Last year, 2,949 honour-related offences were recorded in Britain, but only 95 defendants were prosecuted. In 2023/24, 2,755 offences were registered, but there were only 80 corresponding prosecutions. In 2022/23, there were 3,008 recorded incidents and just 68 successful prosecutions.
Overall, only around 3% of ‘honour’ crimes are prosecuted each year.
Lucy Connolly was banged up pretty quickly in order to intimidate the supposed ‘right-wing thugs’ who were enraged by the Islam-motivated Southport child murders by Britain’s most famous Welsh choirboy. I wonder what happened to the two Pakistani Muslim men who were filmed on security cameras attacking police at Manchester Airport including breaking the nose of one female police officer. Have they even been sentenced yet? Or, in two-tier Keir’s ludicrously biased ‘justice’ system, will there ever be any action taken against them? A cynic might even suspect that the only person who will be punished for the Manchester Airport fight will be ‘the messenger’ – the person who released the whole video to a Manchester newspaper exposing the authorities’ attempts to portray the Pakistani Muslim attackers as innocent victims.
So, it looks like the (IMHO) treacherous, UK-hating, WEF- and UN-adoring Starmer is going ahead with his Chagos Islands giveaway in spite of opposition by the US. We’re told that ‘international law’ forces us to give the islands and £35 billion to Mauritius. But that, like pretty much everything the (IMHO) lying liar Starmer says, is a lie. We’re also told that we’re giving the islands to Mauritius. In reality, we’re giving them to Starmer’s new chums in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as part of Starmer’s obsession with soiling our links with our erstwhile ally America in order to suck up to our enemy China.
However, I don’t wish to spend this blog carping and criticising. So, in spirit of trying to help our government make the best possible decisions in the WEF’s (sorry, I meant ‘Britain’s) interests, I investigated what other British territories Starmer could use the excuse of ‘international law’ to give away to countries who loathe us almost as much as Starmer seems to loathe us.
Here are the main overseas territories still controlled by Britain:
Wow, look at all the opportunities for our surrender-monkey PM Starmer to give away in order to damage Britain and grovel to our enemies.
For a start, in order to curry favour with the German-run European Union, Starmer could hand over Gibraltar to Spain. After all, surely Starmer and Hermer could find some ‘international law’ which says that the original treaty handing Gibraltar to Britain was illegal and that Gibraltar should belong to Spain? Perhaps Starmer and Hermer can even find an ‘international law’ which says we should throw in a few tens of billions of our money as ‘reparations’ to Spain for Britain owning Gibraltar for so many years?
Or there are the Falkland Islands. Reportedly there’s lots of oil and gas in that area as well as abundant fish stocks. We don’t need the Falklands’ oil and gas in Britain as we have mad Ed Miliband’s wonderful 12th century windmills and we don’t have a fishing industry anymore. It can’t be too difficult for Starmer and Hermer to find an ‘international law’ which demands the Malvinas be handed over to the Argies?, And there must be some ‘international law’ stating that the British defence of the Falklands after the Argie invasion was illegal. So we also should give the Argies billions of reparations for the sinking of the Belgrano and for all the Argy soldiers killed in Thatcher’s supposedly ‘illegal’ Falklands war?
And then there are our military bases in Cyprus. Under ‘international law’ do we actually have a right to control these bases? Perhaps ‘international law’ dictates that China has just as much right to these bases as Britain? So we could give those directly to China? After all, in Starmer’s ‘international law’ world communist totalitarian China is our friend and democratic, freedom-loving America is our enemy.
Hey, and while we’re having our “Great British Giveaway” Starmer, what about expelling the Americans from their military bases in the UK and handing those over to China too? After all, you’ve just refused the US permission to use their UK military bases for any action against your ayatollah friends in Iran because that would go against your beloved ‘international law’ (and might upset your Muslim voters). So, if the Americans are forbidden by ‘international law’ from using the bases to defend the Free World, you might as well give the bases to the Chinese. You could also give the Chinese lots of our borrowed money to cover the expense of them moving their fighter jets and bombers and missiles and military personnel to Britain.
Dear Mr Starmer, honourable Knight of the Realm, I hope this short blog gives you a few good ideas on what other British territories you and your band of treacherous, UK-hating Labour scum could use the excuse of ‘international law’ to surrender to our enemies.
(Apologies if you’re a viewer of Simon Webb’s (IMHO) brilliant History Debunked YouTube channel where I first saw this story)
We’re constantly told that without immigration, our beloved NHS (which is the envy of the world) would collapse. But how true is this?
Pakistan’s somewhat dubious ‘pilots‘
Let’s start this blog in Pakistan.
On 22 May 2020, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Flight 8303, a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Lahore to Karachi, crashed while on approach to Jinnah International Airport, killing 97 out of the 99 people on board as well as an additional person on the ground. The aircraft, an Airbus A320-214 with 91 passengers and 8 crew members on board, was approaching the runway too fast and at too great a height. The aircraft subsequently belly landed nearly half-way down the airport runway because the captain and first officer ‘forgot’ to lower the landing gear. Ooops!
The flight crew then conducted a go-around. During the go-around, both engines started to fail due to damage sustained during the belly landing. Whilst attempting to land back on the runway, this time with the landing gear lowered, the aircraft lost airspeed and crashed into buildings. All 8 crew members and 89 out of the 91 passengers on board were killed by the impact and post-crash fire. One person who was inside the buildings died ten days after the crash due to burn injuries.
Subsequent investigations revealed that around 1 in 3 PIA pilots wasn’t actually qualified to fly passenger planes. They had got their licences due to corruption – mainly bribing examiners with generous dollops of cash.
Nigeria’s somewhat dubious ‘nurses’
Hundreds of frontline NHS staff are treating patients despite being under investigation for their part in an alleged “industrial-scale” qualifications fraud. More than 700 nurses are caught up in a potential scandal, which a former head of the Royal College of Nursing said could put NHS patients at risk.
The scam allegedly involves proxies impersonating nurses and taking a key test in Nigeria, which must be passed for them to become registered and allowed to work in the UK.
What about our beloved NHS?
So, given that so many doctors, nurses, radiologists and other healthcare workers come from some of the world’s most corrupt, cess-pit countries, where lying, cheating amd dishonesty are the national sport, how many medics trained abroad working in the NHS are actually qualified?
Of course, we don’t know the answer. But we can get a hint of whether there might be a more than minor problem with such people employed by the NHS. Here are the latest ten doctors referred to the Medical Practioners Tribunal Service:
Dr Mohamed EL MUIAD – February 2026
Dr Lina SIMAVICIUTE – February 2026
Dr Isa ALALWANI – February 2026
Dr Ramamoorthy RAGURAM – February 2026
Dr Piotr PIERZCHNIAK – February 2026
Dr Attiya SHEIKH – February 2026
Dr Victor EVBUOMWAN – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Joseph RUGEMINTWAZA – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Najmiah AHMAD – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Sonali MUKHERJEE-BOSE – February 2026
Not too many typical British names there?
But before we start to draw any possible conclusions, here are the next 10 doctors investigated for various alleged offences:
Dr Ian HUDSON – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Atif ZAMAN – January 2026
Dr Mark ELIAS – January 2026
Dr Mohit CHHABRA – January 2026
Dr Ronald JAMES – January 2026
Dr Velmurugan KUPPUSWAMY – January 2026
Dr Saheb Peer SHABAZ KHALANDER – January 2026
Dr Alan CAMPBELL – January 2026
Dr Neill GARRARD – January 2026
Dr Sekela MWAMBINGU – January 2026
This time, about 5 of the 10 doctors investigated seem to have British-sounding names. But in the next 10 investigated, only one seems to have a British-sounding name. And in the following 10, just 2 had British-sounding names.
Like’s too short for me to investigate the background and education of all the doctors investigated by the Tribunal to see whether they got their medical qualifications in Britain or in one of the world’s more regulatory-challenged, ethically-challenged, morally-challenged countries. But a quick glance at the activities of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service could give some readers pause for thought next time a doctor or nurse from one of the world’s more ‘exotic’ countries is going to treat them:
Starmer, Reeves and company seem to be doing everything thay can to p*ss of the USA and ingratiate ourselves with the EU. Our future economic growth, Starmer and Reeves assure us, lies in closer relations with the EU and the US can go swing in the wind.
Being a really really boring person, I had a quick look at the basic numbers to check whether alienating America and grovelling to the EU really was the route to Britain’s economic salvation.
Here are a few, possibly relevant, figures:
The US economy is projected to hit around $31.82 trillion in 2026. The EU is projected to reach $22.52 trillion
The population of the USA is about 342 million and the EU population about 450 million
The GDP per capita of the US is around $86,000 compared to the EU’s GDP per capita of just $43,000. The UK’s gdp per capita is about $60,000
So there’s something bit odd here. The UK’s gdp per capita lies between the US’s impressive $86,000 and the EU’s rather less admirable $43,000. Yet Starmer and Reeves claim we’re better off distancing ourselves from the rich USA and getting closer to the much poorer EU. Hmmm?
Now we need to look at projected gdp growth rates:
The 2026 projected growth rate for the US economy is about 2.1%
The 2026 projected growth rate for the EU is 1.4%
The 2026 projected growth rate for the UK is 1.3%
So, if you weren’t Starmer or Reeves, which economy would you rather link into? The USA’s with a projected 2026 growth rate of 2.1% on an economy worth $31.82 trillion or the EU’s with a projected growth rate of just 1.4% on an economy worth just $22.52 trillion?
Tough question, huh?
But don’t worry. Having having had the figures analysed by hordes of spotty, just-out-of-universlty, barely pubescent spads, Starmer and Reeves have decided that the EU is our economic future.
I guess I could never have become a government adviser as I would have based my advice on facts rather than ideological fantasies.
Since August 2020, Juan Carlos, the disgraced Spanish (former) king has lived in self-imposed exile in Abu Dhabi from Spain over allegedly improper ties to business deals in Saudi Arabia. The New York Times estimated in 2014 that Juan Carlos’s fortune was around €1.8 billion ($2.3 billion). The ageing ex-monarch was forced to abdicate the throne in 2014 in favour of his son, Felipe, under a cloud of scandal.
That brings us to our own rotten royal, the charming former Prince Andrew. As even more Epstein files are released, it’s not impossible that more scandals will emerge about Andrew’s shenanigans – things like dubious sexual encounters, dodgy business dealings and leaking of confidential government documents in exchange for cash, favours and other delights.
So, what will King Charles do? Will he keep Andrew under a short tether on Charles’s Sandringham estate? Ot will King Charles do whhat the Spanish did with their disgraced former monarch and allow Andrew to decamp to a luxury residence in one of the Gulf states?
To help our noble King decide what to do with Andrew, I’ve been doing a little research to find somewhere which would suit Andrew’s particular temperament and interests. Dubai may be just the place. The population of Dubai is just over 4 million. Probably this figure doesn’t include the number of prostitutes working there as prostitution is illegal.
Google tells us: It is impossible to provide an exact, verified number for prostitutes in Dubai, as prostitution is strictly illegal in the UAE, and therefore no official statistics exist. The trade operates underground, making precise estimation difficult.
Earlier estimates from as far back as 2010 and 2016 suggested figures of up to 30,000 sex workers in Dubai alone. However, various media reports and human rights organizations have offered wide-ranging estimates. A more recent report from April 2024 by a Swiss newspaper claimed that over 50,000 prostitutes operate in Dubai.
The sex trade in Dubai is largely fueled by human trafficking, with many women brought from abroad—especially from Eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa—often under false pretenses of legitimate work, only to have their passports confiscated and be forced into sexual slavery. The UAE has faced international criticism for its handling of sex trafficking, with human rights activists and some foreign law enforcement agencies reporting a lack of cooperation from local authorities.
So, if we assume that about 30% of Dubai’s population are males of prostitute-using age (1,200,000) then there is a prostitute for somewhere between every 40 and every 24 men.
Just to put this into context, there are around 32,000 prostitutes in London for a population of just over 9 million. So Dubai is definitely a great place for serial mongers like our noble former prince is rumoured to be.
Yup, Dubai seems to be just the place for our Randy Andy to spend the rest of his days shagging and shagging and shagging and ……..
Dear King Charles, I hope this is helpful as you decide the best way to get your wayward brother away from British media attention and British and American law enforcement.
Fresh from murdering 10,000 or 20,000 or even more innocent, unarmed protestors, imprisoning tens of thousands more and starting public hangings of some of those prisoners, the Islamic regime in Iran has just been elected as Vice-Chair of the U.N. Commission for Social Development, whose priority theme will be promoting democracy, gender equality, and ensuring tolerance and non-violence:
NO JOKE: The Islamic regime in Iran has just been elected as Vice-Chair of the U.N. Commission for Social Development, whose priority theme will be promoting democracy, gender equality, and ensuring tolerance and non-violence.
As readers hopefully know, our PM – internationalist WEF puppet Starmer – loathes Britain, despises the British and believes the world would be a better place if countries and borders were abolished and we were all controlled by a small clique of bureaucrats, people like himself. To achieve this globalists’ paradise, Starmer is busy inviting anyone who wants to come to Britain. And it seems that under Starmer, the less educated and more unemployable a migrant is, the more he or she (it’s usually a ‘he’) are welcome. Of course, this has led to an epidemic of rapes, sexual assaults on White British girls and many other sorts of crime. But Starmer and his UK-hating MPs believe that this is a price worth paying in order to make White British a minority in their own country by around 2050. Though perhaps we shouldn’t criticise Starmer too much. It seems Starmer is only continuing the anti-British policies eagerly pursued by the utterly incompetent, lying Tories. Here I’m tempted to agree with flame-haired Rubinesque temptress, Angela ‘the gob’ Rayner – the Tories really are scum as she so elegantly phrased it.
One result of this open-borders, bring-in-the Third-World crusade has been to collapse our perma-crisis health service.
There are around 54,500 GPs in Britain. But as many work part-time, this is only 38,500 FTEs (full-time equivalents). These GPs work in about 7,800 GP surgeries.
Last year 752,730 people from abroad registered with a GP in Britain. That’s about 20 foreigners per GP FTE and 100 foreigners per GP surgery. In the 10 years from 2010 to 2020, more than 6 million foreigners have registered with a UK GP. That’s over 150 foreigners per GP FTE and more than 750 foreigners per GP surgery.
None of these foreigners will have been living in the UK and so none of them will have paid any taxes to fund our NHS. Yet all of them will be entitled to free medical care on our once National Health Service, which under the useless Tories and even worse Labour has become an International Health Service.
Ever wondered why you can’t get a doctor’s appointment and have to wait months for hospital treatment?
Perhaps the arrival of over 9 million foreigners since 2010 might be part of the explanation?
I was going to do this story a few days ago. But then other stuff came up. Since then, the story has been covered by others including Guido Fawkes and Simon Webb’s History Debunked. So, apologies if you’ve already seen it. However, I thought it so important and worth covering in case some people haven’t seen it.
Flame-haired Rubinesque temptress, Angel ‘Tories are scum’ Rayner, she of the world-famous ginger growler, may be about to be hoist by her own petard.
“Hoist by your own petard” means being harmed, caught, or ruined by one’s own plan, trick, or trap designed for someone else. It signifies an ironic reversal, commonly referring to a situation where a person’s schemes backfire, causing them to suffer the consequences they intended for others. Apparently it comes from Shakespeare’s Hamlet (Act 3, Scene 4).
When Mr ‘slimy’ Sunak became prime minister, Angela Rayner attacked the change of prime minister claiming that any new prime minister wouldn’t have a mandate as they would not have been elected. Rayner demanded a General Election:
Now that it looks like the adorable WEF robotic waste of skin Starmer is about to be defenestrated and replaced by Rayner, Streeting, Miliband or (God help us) UK mastermind David Lammy, will Rayner still insist that a change of leader mid-term should lead to a General Election?
When Labour do finally boot out the loathsome Starmer, it will be interesting to see how Rayner responds when journalists ask her why she felt there was a need for a General Election when Sunak became Tory leader, but doesn’t believe there should be a General Election when Labour changes its leader.
Liars. clowns and fools?
As for Starmer’s replacement. It seems that tthere omly liars, clowns and fools:
Rayner – small problems with £40,000 tax not paid to HMRC and her belief that a change of leader should lead to a General Election
Streeting – a creature reportedly mentored by Mandelscum with whom he apparently shares an interest in backdoor gardening. Moreover, Streeting’s ‘partner’ apparently worked for Mandelscum as a Political Assistant from 2001 to 2004. Though it seems that Streeting’s ‘partner’ has been doing a ‘Rachel Reeves’ on his cv, removing all reference to our beloved Lord Mandelson
Mad eco-warrior Ed Miliband who is determined to wipe out what pathetically little remains of British industry and take us back to the Stone Age in order to save the planet from non-existing anthropogenic Global Warming
David ‘lamebrain’ Lammy – Mastermind champion and the man who wants to bankrupt Britain by making millions who never owned slaves pay billions in reparations to millions who were never slaves and who enjoy a much better lifestyle in the developed world than if their forefathers had remained in failed, impoverished, no-hope, cess-pit Africa.
I agree with the Ginger Growler – we need a General Election now.
In an article in yesterday’s Sunday Telegraph titled “Lammy: I warned Starmer about Mandelson”, we’re informed:
“Friends of the Deputy Prime Minister confirmed on Saturday night that he had not been in favour of bringing the “Prince of Darkness” back into government over his links to Jeffrey Epstein.”
“Mr Lammy is the first Cabinet minister to break openly with the embattled Prime Minister, whose future hangs in the balance over the Mandelson scandal.”
But hold on a minute. Here’s what Mr Lammy told us at the time of Mandelcsum’s appointment as ambassador to the US:
I am confused. I can only see four possible explanations for this apparent change of heart of Mr Lammy:
maybe David Lammy has a twin brother, also called David Lammy, who is also Deputy Prime Minister and maybe the two David Lammy twins disagree about Mr Mandelscum’s suitability to be the UK ambassador
maybe David Lammy is telling the truth now that he did really warn Starmer about the dangers of promoting Mandelscum, but Lammy then lied to us about Mandelscum’s suitability? This makes Lammy a liar, in my humble opinion.
maybe Lammy never warned Starmer about the dangers of bringing Mandelscum back into public life and Lammy is lying to us if he now claims that he did warn Starmer? This makes Lammy a liar, in my humble opinion
maybe Lammy never claimed to the Sunday Telegraph that he had warned Starmer about Mandelscum as the Sunday Telegraph has only quoted ‘friends of the Deputy Prime Minister’ and not the man himself. In this case, I hope that Mr Lammy contacts the Sunday Telegraph and gets them to correct the error as I’m sure Mr Lammy wouldn’t want us to be reading any disinformation about his good self.
David Craig, on February 25th, 2026
