And, anyone who remembers ‘The Devil Went Down to Georgia’ by the Charlie Daniels Band will possibly enjoy this one just done by someone much smarter than myself:
I just thought it might be worth regurgitating a few unfortunate facts about the migration invasion/takeover our political, media, academic and business elites are forcing on us. It’s not a pretty sight:
in the year to June 2025, the overall inflow remained very high, with 900,000 visas issued over the same period. That’s 900,000 people, often from countries and cultures rather different to ours, being let into our country. That’s 3,461 people every single day
our rulers will try to claim that we need these wonderful people to fill jobs which British ‘workers’ can’t be bothered to do. But Office for National Statistics data published on Thursday 27th November showed that only 98,000 of these visas were went to main work visa applicants. This means only 11% of the nearly 900,000 people migrating to Britain in the year to mid 2025 came here to work. Others were illegal migrants, ‘students’ (many of whom would sneek into Britain on student visas often for fake colleges and then claim asylum), supposed ‘family members’ (pretty much anyone from the migrant’s village) and heaven knows who else our UK-hating Home Office officials decide will make our country more vibrant and more diverse ‘cos diversity is our strength
over the same period, 96,000 fabulous individuals claimed asylum. So there were almost as many asylum claimants (96,000) as there were people who really did come on work visas (98,000)
So, to summarise, 89% of those who came to Britain did not come to work. No wonder your taxes are going up and up and up in Rachel Reeves’s ‘Benefits Street migrant goldrush’ budget.
Meanwhile, the number of young educated Brits leaving has almost doubled from around 65,000 (if I remember correctly) to over 100,000.
Professor Matt Goodwin was ridiculed by some in the mainstream media when he claimed that White British could become a minority in their own country by 2063 and only 33.7% by the end of the century. Given our rulers’ open borders ‘let them all in’ policies, those dates could come even sooner. But there’s some good news. Thanks to the uselessness of our ‘envy-of-the-world’ NHS, with its Third-world rates of survival from things like cancer, strokes and heart attacks, many of us won’t live long enough to see our country become an African-style failed state.
The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse are figures from the Book of Revelation who represent conquest, war, famine, and death. They appear as a white horse, a red horse, a black horse, and a pale horse, respectively, as the first four of the seven seals are opened, signaling the end of the world:
Now Britain seems to be under attack from the Four Horsepeople of the Labour Apocalypse.
In no particular order, here they are:
1. Rachel Reeves and her budgets from hell
Reeves’s latest budget has landed like a lorry-load of cold vomit. Though, it probably wasn’t even Reeves’s budget. More likely it was written by Torsten ‘tax-tax-tax’ Bell and Darren ‘they’re mostly women and children’ Jones. And being Chancellor, the hapless, hopeless Reeves was the one who had to present the thing.
There have been plenty of commentators who have expounded at length how this monstrosity of a budget favoured two main groups – the idle, feckless, lazy garbage who can’t be bothered to work as they get more from benefits than from working and all our migrant friends who will continue to be housed in luxury most Brits could never afford and who will be rewarded for banging out as many sprogs as they can manage. After all, when the two-child benefits cap is scrapped, who is likely to have most brats – a working middle-class professional white British family or a Somali or Ethiopian goat herder who has been welcomed to Britain because he adds to the country’s vibrancy and diversity?
2. Ed ‘destroyer of jobs’ Miliband
Next horseman of the Apocalypse facing Britain is Ed Miliband. His crazed Net Zero fantasies are bankrupting British households and businesses by giving us the highest energy prices in the developed world. Even worse, this economically-challenged lunatic is preventing us using our own coal, oil and gas making us dependent on countries which might not like us very much. And even worse than that, Marxist Miliband is apparently popular with backbench Labour MPs. If Starmer goes, we may get the recidivist failure Miliband as our next PM
3. Red Angie Rayner
It seems that Red Angie will soon be back on Labour’s front bench of clowns and fools. Although it appears that under her Employment Rights Bill employees will not have full rights from Day One but will have to wait 6 monThs, the 300+ pages of red tape and regulations will crush British businesses and lead to a huge increase in unemployment as employers don’t want to take the risk of falling foul of Rayner’s bureaucratic follies.
4. Keir ‘WEF’ Starmer
And the final Horseman of Labour’s Apocalypse is Keir ‘race replacement’ Starmer. This idiot is desperately trying to force entrepreneurs and highly-educated young people to leave Britain while importing hundreds of thousands of often uneducated, often unemployable, often criminal, usually misogynist, often West-hating Third Worlders whose future contribution to our once great country is likely to be highly questionable. But being a Yuman Rights lawyer, Starmer seems to believe that anyone and every one has a right to come and live in Britain. Thus no ‘evil people-smuggling gangs’ have been smashed and small boat arrivals are hitting record levels under the (IMHO) treacherous piece of lying trash Starmer.
Conclusion
Our country could have survived one or even two of the Horsepeople of Labour’s Apocalypse. But it’s highly doubtful that we can survive all four without our country being damaged forever.
My website seems to have been under attack, mainly from Russian sites.
I’m trying to get things fixed.
In the meantime, here’s another satirical YouTube video produced by people much smarter than myself.
Our politically-correct mainstream media seem to despise us and constantly lie to us as much as our political leaders. But mercifully the resistance to the destruction of the West lives on thanks to the creativity and courage of YouTubers using the Internet. We are not beaten yet:
If you go onto YouTube and type in something about Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood’s supposed ‘crackdown’ on illegal migration, you’ll get video after video claiming Shabana ‘Mohammedin’ Mahmood is implementing “tough Danish-style” new rules to cut illegal immigration.
Of course, the Mohammedin’s supposedly “tough new rules” are complete nonsense, have more holes than a sieve, will be opposed by most Labour MPs and won’t survive five minutes in the courts once Starmer’s lefty, UK-loathing, grifting, yuman rights lawyer chums start their attacks. Moreover, these supposedly “tough Danish-style” new rules will, from what little I understand, only apply to illegal migrants who arrive after Parliament passes the new laws, which will probably never happen.
But I suspect Mahmood knows this and all she’s doing is trying to look tough on illegal migration while actually leaving our non-existent borders wide open and continuimg to use Border Farce to ferry in hordes of future new Labour voters.
Anyway, what about the hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants already here? Well, here’s a short video of the real Shabana ‘Mohemmedin’ Mahmood. She wants to give them all amnesty to allow them to remain in Britain living off benefits and criminality for the rest of their lives while many will enjoy raping underage white girls for their entertainment:
I don’t know how she will do it, but I’m fairly sure the Mohammedin is planning an amnesty. She’ll probably try to dress it up as something else like ‘speeding up asylum applications’ when all she’ll really be doing is showering the illegal migrants with British passports like confetti while claiming she’s deterring people from coming to Britain.
I’ll leave it up to you to decide whether Mahmood’s coming amnesty for hundreds of thousands of largely uneducated, largely unemployable, often criminal, deeply misogynist, rape-loving, UK-hating Third-worlders will act as a deterrent or invitation for hundreds of thousands more.
I guess the Mahmood creature was rather hoping we’d all forgotten what she really thinks. So, please don’t believe a single word this (IMHO) typical lying Labour piece of trash says.
A BBSea shanty
Here, to cheer us up, is yet another (IMHO) brilliant AI political parody. This time it’s about ‘our’ ever so impartial BBC:
Probably the most important and revealing quote by any UK politician this year came from a Ms Cat Eccles, a Labour MP for Stourbridge. The brilliant Ms Eccles accused the home secretary, Shabana Mahmood, of “trying to appease the electorate” with Mahmood’s policy blitz against “illegal migrants”.
This quote from Ms Eccles exposed what our rulers really believe. They no longer feel they have been elected to represent the views of the electorate. Instead they see themselves as being part of a superior class which knows what is good for the electorate and which can impose on the electorate the views and beliefs of the ruling elites. Thus government policies are no longer something that are done for the electorate. Instead they are things which are done to the electorate.
We see this in almost everything the ConLibLab governments have done over the last several decades:
the electorate doesn’t want open-borders, Third-world immigration. But the elites impose mass immigration on us because they despise us and believe that Britain should be open for everyone
the electorate doesn’t want British homes and the British economy to be bankrupted by the highest electricity prices in the world. But the elites believe the anthropogenic Global Boiling nonsense and so are determined to impose their ruinous, economically-suicidal Net Zero policies on us
the electorate doesn’t want 1984-style censorship of free speech and North-Korean-style digital IDs. But the elites desperately want to control what we think and say and do, so they use the police and the courts to beat us into submission deciding what we are allowed to say and do
the electorate doesn’t want to pay tens of billions to Mauritius to take some British territory off our hands. But the elites grovel to some worthless international court and hand over our territory and our money
the electorate know that there are only two sexes and two genders. But the elites bow down to the trans crazies and try to force us to believe something we all know not to be true – that there are many genders
most of the electorate are proud of being British and of Britain’s history. The elites despise Britain and British history and are determined to indoctrinate us and especially our children into believing that everything Britain has done in the past was imperialist and evil and therefore we owe a duty to all those who we supposedly ‘oppressed’ but actually saved from primitive savagery
the electorate know that slavery has always existed and that many British sailors and soldiers gave their lives to stop the transatlantic slave trade. But the elites want us to believe that we were responsible for slavery and so we, who have never owned slaves, should pay reparations to those who have never been slaves
the electorate know that many of the hundreds of thousands who can’t be arsed to get a job as they’d rather live off benefits are lazy parasitic skivers and scum. But the elites see them as ‘victims’ and will tax and tax and tax those who do work in order to pay for the idle and feckless
I could go on, but you probably get the picture by now.
So, don’t be surprised next time our government brings in policies which make your lives more difficult and impoverish you. For the ruling elites, policies are something they do to the electorate, not something they do for the electorate
Keir the (c)rapper?
And here’s yet another rather amusing AI political parody video. They seem to be coming thick and fast nowadays:
In my 2015 book – The Great Charity Scandal – I wrote one chapter about foreign aid.
In this chapter, I wrote:
In Europe, after the Second World War the US-sponsored Marshall Plan is generally credited for helping war-ravaged European countries to rebuild and become prosperous. So some people have demanded a ‘Marshall Plan for Africa’. There’s only one problem with this demand. Africa has already had its Marshall Plan – several times over. In the last fifty years Africa has been given the equivalent of around ten Marshall Plans. In today’s money, the five-year European Marshall Plan saw about $100 billion – $20 billion a year – being used to rebuild Europe after WWII. In the last fifty years, Africa has received over $1 trillion in aid. So, Africa received about the same every year – $20 billion a year – for fifty years that Europe received each year for just five years. Yet there’s little evidence that those countries getting the most aid have benefited from this aid and a quarter of Sub-Saharan countries, including some of the world’s greatest recipients of foreign aid, are now poorer than they were in 1960.
I’ve just checked the latest figures and (according to Google) apparently In 2024, the total amount of foreign aid given by member countries of the OECD’s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) was approximately $212.1 billion. So, we’re now giving the equivalent of two Marshall plans a year and yet one might be justified in wondering where our money actually goes.
Again in my book written 10 years ago, I show some figures which might explain how our foreign aid money often mysteriously disappears:
I also show the utter hopelessness of throwing our money at countries whose populations are growing to levels the land cannot support and never will be able to support:
But, don’t worry. As you give and give and give, the massive Third-world population explosion might slow down as our Great Leader invites them all to come here so you can pay for them again with Reeves’s endlessly-increasing taxes:
On 3 June 2024, I emailed the Sunday Times’s economics nabob with the following question:
Both Labour and Conservatives have promised to lower the UK’s debt levels as a percent of GDP by promoting economic growth. But at the same time, both parties are pushing up energy prices by reducing the use of cheap reliable fossil fuels and increasing the amount generated by unreliable, intermittent and expensive wind and solar.
Perhaps it would be useful for your readers if you could explain how a country aiming to be the world’s leading clean energy superpower with some of the world’s most expensive energy can have a competitive growing economy?
The reply I got was fairly shorty and to the point “No”.
I haven’t yet read this great economist’s words of profundity and wisdom in the most recent Sunday Times’s ‘Business & Money‘ section. But I noticed that the quote which the editor or sub-editor or sub-sub-editor chose to highlight in big bold black lettering was “The economy has been battered by taxes, tariffs and interest rates“.
OK, I ain’t no world-class economist like the Sunday Times’s resident genius or Britain’s internationally-respected Chancellor Rachel ‘economy-ruiner’ Reeves. But having worked in over 80 organisations in 15 countries, I just get a niggling feeling that Britain, with its Net Zero lunacy, giving us some of the world’s highest energy prices might possibly be having a negative effect on the competitiveness of what pathetically little is left of British industry.
I only pick out the Sunday Times’s economics expert as I’ve just once had direct contact with him. But as we approach Torsten Bell’s (sorry, I meant ‘Rachel Reeves’s’) economy-crashing budget from hell I suspect you’ll find most of Britain’s economics pontificators blethering and blethering away but always carefully avoiding what Reform’s admirable Richard Tice calls ‘Net stupid Zero’. The mainstream media commentators will ‘forget’ to mention that the main reason for our current economic decline are the asphiatingly high energy prices Net stupid Zero is inflicting on British businesses and households.
And while we’re on the subject of Britain’s supposed ‘economists’, you’ll constantly hear that Britain’s economy is griowing by 0.2% or 0.1% or something like that. As I’ve often said I’m no economist. But I believe this supposed ‘GDP growth’ is actually a fiction as it’s based on our useless useless useless government borrowing record amounts of money to fund massive pay rises for our lazy, incompetent, bloated, deliver-nothing public sector.
Oh. and here’s a short video I made a few months ago about our most esteemed Chancellor:
We have heard so many lies by the (IMHO) worthless lying liar Keir ‘Liar’ Starmer and the bunch of out-of-their-depth floundering incompetents in his pathetic excuse for a government, that’s it’s difficult to take anything they say seriously. But over the next couple of weeks slimy slithering Starmer and his gang of fools are expecting us to believe two even bigger lies than those he has tried to fool us with so far.
Shabana ‘Mohammedin’ Mahmood’s great immigration ‘crackdown’
I haven’t looked at the details of Mohammedin Mahmood’s much vaunted immigration supposed ‘crackdown’ Life’s too short. But there already some more than obvious (deliberate?) rather monstrous holes in Mahmood’s promises. For a start, none of her great new rules will apply to any of the 4 million or so migrants who have invaded our country as part of and after the Boriswave. Moreover, immigrtaion is still running at over 400,000 a year and there must be hundreds of thousands of illegals already here.
Secondly, will Mahmood get her fabulous new laws past her own open-borders, hug-a-migrant, UK-loathing MPs and Starmer’s UK-loathing, grifting, yuman rights lawyer chums??
Thirdly, does anyone really believe that someone from Mahmood’s background is an ardent, Union-Jack-waving patriot determined to defend Britain’s borders against the Third-world invasion?
And fourth, if she actually wanted to defend our borders, she’d send out the useless Border Farce and even a few small Royal Navy ships (if the Navy has any left) to force the boats back to France.
Lies, lies and more lies. But maybe you’re prepared to believe some impossible things before breakfast?
‘Economist’ Reeves can grow the economy by taxing us into penury
We saw how Labour’s first budget, with its jobs tax, massive increase in business rates and punitive changes in inheritance tax brought the economy to a shuddering halt. Moreover, our politicians and make-believe economists claim the economy is growing, though that growth is barely visible. But I have shown in a previous blog that the supposed growth is a mirage. Just the 5% rise in public-sector wages provided about 5 times the claimed ‘growth’. So the real economy, which supports our bloated, incompetent, deliver-nothing public sector is actually falling off a cliff and hundredds of thousands of jobs have been lost since Reeves’s last budgetary farce.
Even worse, by delaying her next budget as late as possible, useless useless useless Reeves had crushed economic activity while people and companies hold on to their money in fear of what Useless Useless Useless will do in her upcoming budget. Though, I suspect Useless Useless Useless is not actually doing the budget. I suspect that the real budget writer is a gentleman called Torsten ‘tax-tax-tax’ Bell. You just need to Google him to understand how economy-devastating his budget will be.
But if you want to believe two impossible things before breakfast – Mahmmod will control our borders and Reeves/Bell can tax their way to growth – then I suggest you look for a psychiatrist.