Research in the US suggests that over 80% of gay men – botty-botherers, shirt-lifters, anus-addicts (I don’t know what the latest politically-correct term is so please forgive me if I use a term that some people feel is inaccurate in any way) – vote democrat. In the UK, similar research suggests that over 70% of gay men vote Labour or Libdem.
This means that a huge majority of backdoor-bangers are progressive liberals who believe in such libtardy things as globalism and open borders and welcoming fake refugees and all that kind of stuff.
I therefore couldn’t help feeling a small tingle of schadenfreude when I read the following story.
Nine men have been sentenced for a brutal and unprovoked series of violent assaults including “acid” attacks, described as “homophobic” by the media.
Huseyin Onel, 24 (30/03/94) of no fixed abode, but from the Hackney area, was sentenced to 17 years in prison for applying a noxious substance causing grievous bodily harm (GBH), plus an additional three years on extended licence. Onel was sentenced to nine years each for six counts of casting a noxious substance and three years for violent disorder to run concurrently.
Mehmet Tekagac, 30 (03/09/88) of Kenworthy Road, E9 was sentenced to 14-and-a-half years in prison for applying a noxious substance causing GBH, plus an additional three years on extended licence. To run concurrently, Tekagac was sentenced to eight years for robbery and three years for violent disorder.
Oner Ardic, 27 (02/11/91) of Frampton Park Road, E9 was sentenced to 14 years in prison for applying a noxious substance causing GBH plus three years on extended licence. He was also sentenced to three years for violent disorder to run concurrently.
Given Ulas, 20 (21/12/98) of Pultney Street, N1, was sentenced to 30 months in prison for violent disorder.
Mustafa Kiziltan, 30 (10/09/88) of no fixed abode, but from the Hackney area, was sentenced to a total of three years in prison – 27 months for violent disorder and nine months for dangerous driving. He was also sentenced to three months for failing to stop, this will run concurrently.
Serkan Kiziltan, 22 (03/11/96) of Well Street, E9, was sentenced to 18 months for violent disorder.
Umit Kaygisiz, 21 (26/12/97) of Orsman Road, N1, was sentenced to a total of 28 months in prison for violent disorder and attempting to convey a prohibited item into prison (namely a mobile phone).
Yasam Erdogan, 24 (24/11/94) of Nightingale Road, N1, was sentenced to 18 months for violent disorder, suspended for two years.
Turgut Adakan, 23 (20/06/95) of Roman Road, E6, was sentenced to 18 months for violent disorder, suspended for two years.
Here are six of the men responsible for the ‘homophobic’ attacks:
Of course, these allegedly ‘homophobic’ men might be tenth generation white indigenous Brits. But there’s just something about their names and their faces which suggests that they may have a multi-cultural enriching background.
Still, Britain’s gay men shouldn’t complain about such attacks. After all, open borders and inviting the Third World with Third-World beliefs and Third-World customs into Britain is what most of them enthusiastically voted for.
And anyway, at least the Third-World multi-cultural enrichers aren’t throwing British gay men off high buildings:
And then stoning their bodies into a bloody pulp:
Or anyway, they haven’t started doing that yet.
When that starts, perhaps Britain’s gays will finally realise that they voted for the wrong political parties?
Hardly a day goes by without yet another rabid libtard supposed Feminist ranting about #metoo and how awful white Western men are:
And yes, there are many white Western men who have abused their positions to exploit vulnerable females. There’s alleged rapist Bill “Cigar” Clinton, for example. Although Feminists tend not to mention him as he’s a progressive lefty democrat. But they hate Trump even though he hasn’t actually molested or sexually assaulted anyone:
Though some Feminists are so butt ugly, that no man would want to grab them by the p*ssy or anywhere else:
Perhaps that’s what really makes them so angry?
Innocent girls die
But let’s move to the serious stuff. The United Nations estimate that somewhere between 5,000 and 20,000 girls/women are murdered each year as a result of honour killings. I’m not a female, but I imagine being groped or having sex in return for a multi-million-dollar role in a major movie or having a certain fat American film producer wank off into a hotel plant pot in front of you or even being raped is slightly less unpleasant than being murdered because someone in your family believes you have betrayed your family’s honour.
I mention honour killings because a Canadian, who converted to the most wonderful favoutitest religion, has just been murdered in Crapistan. She was strangled and then her family hung her up to make the murder look like a suicide. This is apparently quite a common practice in Crapistan. Though I believe being covered in burning oil is also fairly popular.
But strangely, our dear screaming, ranting, mouth-frothing, holier-than-thou Feminists simply don’t mention honour killings. Between 5,000 and 20,000 girls slaughtered each year and not a peep of protest from our Feminist sisters! Why not? I think we all know why. Libtards never criticise the most wonderfullest religion however horrendous its practices and cruelty.
Shame on all you disgusting, narcissistic libtard Feminists for your hypocrisy and cowardice!
To end today’s blog, here are two beautiful young Egyptian-American girls Amina and Sarah Said:
They were allegedly murdered by their father Yaser Abdel Said in Texas.
Said, who is reported to have been very controlling of his family, is believed to have felt that his daughters, Amina, 18, and Sarah, 17, had dishonored the family by refusing to adhere to traditional standards of Egyptian cultural behavior. On January 1, 2008, he lured them into his taxi cab on the pretense of taking them out to eat, and shot them in the cab. Said has evaded police capture, and remains at large.
Probably Yaser Abdel Said has fled back to his native Egypt where he’ll no doubt be treated as a hero for slaughtering his two beautiful daughters. Or he may still be in the US being sheltered by his community who probably believe he did nothing wrong. After all, his daughters were often seen happy and smiling while wearing Western clothes rather than being miserable, downtrodden covered in a black sheet with just a small slit for their eyes. Maybe the girls even dreamed of getting a proper education and having careers rather than becoming bloated oppressed faceless baby factories for some Abdul or Ahmed? That in itself was surely reason enough to kill them in the eyes of our friends from the world’s most advanced religion?
Meanwhile, the Feminists are silent, they don’t give a damn.
Here’s a short tribute I found on YouTube to Amina and Sarah. It’s very simple but strangely moving:
It used to be common for comedians to make jokes about the Irish being a bit thick. But I imagine an “Irish joke” now would be considered a supposed “hate crime”. So I’ll just stick to documented facts. Though in today’s politically-correct, snowflake world, criticising a group, even just using official reports and figures, probably also constitutes a ‘hate crime’ in the eyes of our useless police.
The Irish Plan 2040
The Irish Government has published a national planning strategy called “Plan 2040”. Here are some of the main objectives of this plan:
Guide the future development of Ireland, taking into account a projected 1 million increase in our population, the need to create 660,000 additional jobs to achieve full employment and a need for 550,000 more homes by 2040;
Of the 1 million extra people,
25% is planned for Dublin, recognised as our key international and global city of scale and principal economic driver,
25% across the other four cities combined (Cork, Limerick, Galway and Waterford), enabling all four to grow their population and jobs by 50-60%, and become cities of greater scale, i.e. growing by twice as much as they did over the previous 25 years to 2016, and
with the remaining 50% of growth to occur in key regional centres, towns, villages and rural areas, to be determined in the forthcoming regional plans – Regional Spatial and Economic Strategies (RSESs)
Some interesting issues arise with this plan. Firstly, most governments can barely plan beyond next week, so how can the Irish government plan for more than 20 years ahead? Secondly, there are general elections in Ireland every 5 years and presidential elections every 7 years. So what would be the point of one government or one president producing a 20-year plan? This would only make sense if the main political parties and the presidential candidates were almost indistinguishable from each other and if they were all pursuing almost exactly the same polices dictated to them by the Bilderberg Brussels bureaucrats. This would make Irish elections meaningless as whichever party or presidential candidate won would follow the same policies
The 2040 ‘population increase’
But the main problem with Plan 2040 is the expected increase in population of about one million people. The Irish birth rate is around 1.9 children per woman down from 4 children per woman in the 1960s and 1970s. The UK is at 1.8. But replacement level is 2.1 children per woman. So, the indigenous Irish population is actually declining.
Ooops! Where are the extra one million people going to come from? Hmmm, I wonder. OK, I remember now – the extra more than one million people will come from Africa, the Middle East and places like Crapistan. That’s 50,000 a year for 20 years – about 1,000 a week.
Of course, many of these wonderful people being imported by Ireland’s rulers may be highly educated, very Westernised and eager to roll up their sleeves and get to work paying taxes to support Ireland’s ageing population. On the other hand, most may be poorly educated, barely literate, low-IQ, violent, lazy, unemployable, West-hating, benefits-scrounging, deeply criminal human flotsam and debris who will impose a massive economic burden on the working Irish, destroy communities and strain public services like health, education and the police as has happened in so many other Western European countries.
How stupid are the Irish?
The Irish population is around 4.8 million. Let’s assume that the indigenous population will decline to about 4 million by 2040 because of the falling birth rate and a long history of native Irish emigrating to the UK and other English-speaking countries in search of new opportunities. Then, of the 5.8 million people who (the Irish government predicts) will be living in Ireland by 2040, around 1.8 million – almost one in three ‘Irish’ – will be from Africa, the Middle East or places like Crapistan.
Let me just repeat that – one in three Irish will be from Africa, the Middle East or Crapistan!
Am I really the only person who has realised what the Irish government’s plan will do to the country?
Ludicrously, the plan has nice pictures of rolling Irish countryside and happy white Irish families:
Perhaps photos of no-go, inner-city ghettoes with women dressed like Darth Vader on a bad hair day and the men screaming about their snackbar and demanding the introduction of Sharia Law would be more appropriate?
Most other Western European governments are following a similar strategy of white race replacement. But no other government has actually announced its plans so openly and so clearly. And yet nobody in Ireland seems to have objected to or even protested against this catastrophic destruction of their country and culture. Though, of course, now Ireland has signed up to the UN Compact on Safe and Orderly Migration, anyone daring to criticise mass migration will probably be committing a criminal offence
This brings us back to the question in the title of this weekend’s blog “How stupid are the Irish?”
I think the answer must be “very stupid indeed”
(if any reader has friends or contacts living in Ireland, perhaps they could send them a link to this weekend’s blog?)
I know you’ll all be as excited as I was to hear that Saint Bob Geldorf of Africa has just been awarded an honorary doctorate by that great and prestigious academic institution – the University of Limerick. In a press interview following the receipt of his obviously well-earned doctorate, the Southern Irishman Geldorf graced us with his opinion that the UK should stay in the EU.
Here’s our Saint Bob looking every bit like the world-famous academic the world-famous University of Limerick apparently believes he is:
As regular readers will know, when Saint Bob the Yob did his BandAid song there were only about 40 million poor, impoverished, starving Ethiopians. Now, thanks to getting food from us and no birth control, there are about 100 million poor, impoverished, starving Ethiopians:
By 2050, there will be over 200 million poor, impoverished, starving Ethiopians.
This massive and uncontrolled population growth is, of course, great news for the well-paid charity bosses and their kiddy-fiddling workers as it will give them an excuse to demand ever more of our money year after year after year after year to feed poor, impoverished, starving Ethiopians.
Again as regular readers will know, pretty much every other miserable African sh*t-hole country is also doubling its population every 20-25 years:
The population of Africa increases by well over a million a week – more than 50 million a year.
So, where will all these poor, impoverished, starving Africans find food and shelter? In an economically-flourishing Africa? No chance! They’ll head for Europe, of course. But even if we take say 10 million of them each year, this will totally destroy European civilisation and yet hardly make even a tiny dent in Africa’s population explosion.
What a total unmitigated disaster!
It’s Limerick time
As I’m sure you can imagine, I felt inspired by the University of Limerick’s honouring of Saint Bob the Yob. To celebrate this unique and important occasion in human history, I’ve slaved away for hours to write a tasteful and poetic limerick in the great Saint Bob’s honour:
A washed out old popstar called Bob
Got honoured for doing a saintly job
But our millions in cash
Vanished in a corrupt flash
Saint Bob you’re just an effing knob with a big gob.
As for Saint Bob’s famous song – Do They Know It’s Christmas? – here’s my version which suggests what really happens with the billions in aid and charity we throw at hopeless, basket-case Africa:
And here’s some of the text that went with that picture:
Over 82.5% of parents in Pakistan are first cousins, 6.8% are blood relatives, 6.3% belong to the same caste and family, and only 4.4% are married out of their families.
A lot of international studies carried out in different parts of the world have also confirmed the hazards of consanguineous marriages and have suggested a comprehensive ban on cousin marriages across the globe. However in Pakistan, ignorance, caste superiority and complexes are main hurdles in the way of reducing the number of cousin marriages.
The study says that there is a 20 percent chance that the children can acquire a genetic problem. The data also shows that the infant mortality risk is higher (over 1.2%) in first-cousin marriages and in terms of birth defects, the risks rise from about 2% in the general population to 4% when the parents are closely related.
Talking to Pakistan Today, Dr Aslam Khan said a human being carries gene mutations which are recessive (hidden) and when families interbreed, these mutations could become dominant and may start showing more expression in the population. “But when a population has a small gene pool the gene mutation can become more frequent,” he said, adding that in consanguineous marriage, disorders which include blindness, deafness, skin diseases, and neurodegenerative conditions become more common”.
This all comes, not from some rabid Izlumophobe, but from the respected Pakistan Today newspaper.
Now let’s move to Britain
While some babies born of first cousin marriages die soon after birth, of the inbred babies who do not die right away, a large number of them have so many physical and mental disabilities, that UK taxpayers are forced to bear the costs of caring for these genetic freaks for the rest of their lives.
A BBC investigation in Britain several years ago revealed that at least 55% of the Pakistani community in Britain was married to a first cousin.
Medical evidence shows that one of the negative consequences of inbreeding is a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths. One study comparing Norwegians and Pakistanis shows the risk that the child dies during labor increases by 50 percent. The risk of death due to autosomal recessive disorders — e.g., cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy — is 18 times higher.
And then there are the findings on intelligence. Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 (criterion for being “retarded”) increases 400 percent among children from cousin marriages.
Multi-cultural impoverishment?
So, who is really wrecking the NHS and social services?
Is it old people who are living too long after working and paying taxes all their lives? Maybe? Or maybe old people are healthier than they have ever been and aren’t as much a strain on the NHS and social services as the progressive liberal elites like to suggest?
Is it the morbidly obese? Observing some of the fat whales waddling around ASDA with their trollies full of crisps and burgers, one could see that they are certainly a burden. Though on my recent visits to hospital, the fattest people I saw were the hospital staff.
Or is everyone afraid to point the finger of blame where it really should be pointed – first-cousin marriages – because to mention that would be waaccissst, and Izlumophobic and divisive and supposed ‘hate speech’?
Here’s a picture of two men who are being sought by the Met Police for raping another man. The rape took place on 24 October 2018. But the Met police have only just released the pictures. So one could wonder why it took useless politically-correct Cressida Dick’s useless politically-correct Met Police so long to release the cctv pictures:
The Met Police describe the men as being “white Eastern Europeans”. Hmmm. I’m not quite sure I fully buy that description. Perhaps the fact that the two supposedly “white Eastern Europeans” don’t really look like “white Eastern Europeans” may explain the worthless Met Police’s delay in releasing the pictures? I guess the Met Police were busy trying to think up a description of the men which didn’t mention what they really look like?
Who knows? Who would trust anything our police say anymore?
Of course, the rape victim may have given the Met Police information indicating that the two rapists were “white Eastern European”. But in my humble opinion, these two “white Eastern Europeans” look awfully like some of these fine chaps:
Furthermore, I suspect the the worthless, Met Police don’t really want to catch these men at all and probably only released the pictures (months after the event) under pressure from the victim and/or his family to give the impression the Met Police were actually doing something.
I further suspect that if a white Brit were to chuck a brick or a bacon sandwich through a mosque window, the Met Police would issue crystal clear cctv pictures within a few hours of the ‘hate crime’ in order to catch the evil perpetrators. But when two men (possibly from a multi-culturally enriching background) rape another man, we only get two blurry cctv pictures several months after the crime.
The whole think stinks.
And here, for those who haven’t seen it, is a video I made about how I believe the (IMHO) total waste of skin, Cressida Dick, became the big boss of the Met police (with thanks to Gilbert and Sullivan):
At the time, the world’s climatologists all apparently agreed that the Earth was warming so rapidly that the polar ice caps would melt and many major coastal cities would become uninhabitable. Helpfully, the newspaper also had a nice picture of how Manhattan would definitely be under water within a few decades due to the supposed rapid melting of the polar ice caps:
Here’s another nice picture of how Manhattan could soon be under water due to the supposed rapid melting of the polar ice caps.
This scare story was from 2010 and is still ongoing.
In the meantime – between the 1934 “we’re all going to die from global warming” scare story and the 2010 “we’re all going to die from global warming” scare story – the world’s leading climatologists all agreed that we were heading for a new Ice Age. So we were actually all going to freeze to death from the cold, not drown from melting ice caps due to warming.
In 1974, 42 of them wrote a letter to President Nixon warning of the catastrophic effects of a new Ice Age in just the same way that the same supposed ‘experts’ are now warning of the catastrophic effects of Global Warming
Here’s part of the text of the 1974 letter to Nixon:
Dear Mr. President:
Aware of your deep concern with the future of the world, we feel obliged to inform you on the results of the scientific conference held here recently. The conference dealt with the past and future changes of climate and was attended by 42 top American and European investigators. We enclose the summary report published in Science and further publications are forthcoming in Quaternary Research.
The main conclusion of the meeting was that a global deterioration of climate, by order of magnitude larger than any hitherto experience by civilized mankind, is a very real possibility and indeed may be due very soon.
The cooling has natural cause and falls within the rank of processes which produced the last ice age. This is a surprising result based largely on recent studies of deep sea sediments.
Existing data still do not allow forecast of the precise timing of the predicted development, nor the assessment of the man’s interference with the natural trends. It could not be excluded however that the cooling now under way in the Northern Hemisphere is the start of the expected shift. The present rate of the cooling seems fast enough to bring glacial temperatures in about a century, if continuing at the present pace.
The practical consequences which might be brought by such developments to existing social institution are among others:
(1) Substantially lowered food production due to the shorter growing seasons and changed rain distribution in the main grain producing belts of the world, with Eastern Europe and Central Asia to be first affected.
(2) Increased frequency and amplitude of extreme weather anomalies such as those bringing floods, snowstorms, killing frosts, etc
You’ll possibly be pleased to see that the new Ice Age was supposed to increase the “frequency and amplitude” of extreme weather events. Exactly the same claim the Warmies are now making about supposed Global Warming. So, in the 1970s, every time there was a big storm or flooding or hot weather or cold weather this was definite proof of global cooling. But now every time there’s a big storm or flooding or hot weather or cold weather this is definite proof of global warming. How convenient!
In the 1970s, a gentleman who became the voice of the world’s climatologists (a bunch of people just as reliable as astrologists) was John P Holdren. He wrote a series of apocalyptic articles about how the new Ice Age would lead to massive crop failures in the Northern hemisphere, starvation and a migration of people from North to the South. John P. Holdren then did a spectacular reverse ferret and later became Saint Obama’s key adviser on (yup, you guessed it) supposed global warming.
Is the Earth warming? Or is it cooling? We don’t know. And does human activity have any effect on the climate? Probably not.
The only thing we do know is that, whatever the supposed ‘scientific consensus’, there will always be plenty of ‘scientists’ and media ‘experts’ and power-hungry politicians eager to jump on whatever is fashionable bandwagon in order to further their own lousy careers and increase their own self-importance and power over us.
I am a brainless, progressive, lefty, BBC-believing, virtue-signalling, rapefugee-hugging, brain-dead snowflake.
I believe that all cultures are equal, that there is no evil anywhere in the world, that sh*t-hole countries are sh*t-holes because of nasty waacisst Western colonialists and that if we all sat around – people of every race – lit candles, held hands, welcomed rapefugees and sang ‘Kumbaya’ then the world would be a peaceful place full of love and multi-culturalism and diversity and harmony and no crime.
But sadly, not everyone is like me. Not everyone is a progressive, brain-dead, narcissistic, virtue-signalling, rapefugee-hugging idiot like me.
There are some people, believe it or not, who think that some cultures are better than others, who don’t believe what the BBC tells us, who believe that some places are total sh*t-holes because their inhabitants are violent, dangerous, low-IQ, semi-morons and that importing millions of illiterate, uneducated, probably low-IQ, violent, rape-obsessed, deeply criminal semi-morons from Africa and the Middle East will be a disaster for once civilised, once cultured, once democratic Europe:
Here’s one of these people who don’t agree with me.
First some good news that the BBC and C4 News might have ‘forgotten’ to report – following the election of the patriotic Bolzonaro in Brazil, one of his first acts as president was to pull out of the UN Global Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration – the agreement that makes migration a human right. The reason for Brazil pulling out – the new president believed that each country should have the right to control its own borders.
Remember, that’s the agreement that the British Government signed up to which was hardly mentioned anywhere in the UK mainstream media. Perhaps the BBC and C4 News ‘forgot’ to report that as well?
Better check your mattress
Have you bought a new mattress recently? If so, I suggest you jump up and down on it a few times. Then if your mattress says “ouch“, you might want to cut it open to see if there’s a multi-cultural enricher inside:
Apparently these two supposedly “impoverished” Africans each paid about $5,000 to people smugglers to hide them in mattresses and transport them into Spain and a life of luxury living off benefits and drug-dealing somewhere in Europe:
And, of course, once in Europe they would have unlimited opportunities to rape white girls for entertainment:
Sadly for them their great plan didn’t quite work and they were caught at the border. But as Spain is a signatory to the UN Global Pact for Safe and Orderly Migration, no doubt these two wonderful people will be allowed into Europe to enrich our society in the only way they know how. As the video below reports – instead of being sent straight back to whatever sh*t-hole they came from, these two enrichers are “being processed by a Spanish immigration centre”.
Perhaps they’ll even be able to come to Britain? Let’s hope so. We really need highly qualified, productive, hard-working migrants like these two.
Meanwhile, the Royal Navy has added extra ships in the Channel to act as free ferry services for anyone wanting to leave safe France to come to Benefits Britain.
Forgive my ignorance, but WTF is the point of having border guards if they actually help illegal migrants across the border from Africa to Europe or if, in the case of Britain, our own navy provides a free, luxury ferry service with food, drinks and healthcare for anyone leaving the French coast?
Oh, I forgot. It’s now the human right of any ignorant, illiterate, unemployable, violent, low-IQ, scumbag from any self-inflicted sh*t-hole on the planet to move to Europe.
If you go to the Leave Means Leave website, just by entering your postcode you can send a pre-written email to your MP demanding that he/she abides by the 2016 vote to leave the EU.
I just did this and received a pre-written reply from my MP in which he claims it wasn’t clear what we were voting for and that the referendum was so long ago that the result should no longer be considered valid. My feelings on reading my MP’s rely cannot be expressed here in polite language:
You are receiving this email as you have contacted me regarding the Brexit deal, whilst I would have liked to respond to each one individually, unfortunately this has proven to be an impossible task due to time limitations. As I am sure you can imagine, I have received more correspondence on this issue than any that has come before. I am grateful for the hundreds of emails and letters sharing views, asking questions and encouraging me to support a variety of different proposals. These vary from supporting the Government’s proposal, to voting against it in order to either leave the EU with no deal (with a view to strike a harder Brexit), to negotiate a Norway Plus model, or hold a second referendum. I understand and appreciate how emotive this topic is, and have taken the time to carefully consider every argument presented to me. At no given time during this process has there been a consistent majority in favour of any one possible scenario. A number of factors must be considered. As a constituency, Bournemouth East voted 55% in favour of leaving the EU. In May 2017, the two main parties (82.4% of the electorate) stood on manifestos to honour a ‘smooth and orderly Brexit.’ I have always been clear on my position to respect the result of the referendum and ensure my constituents have reason to continue to trust the democratic process. In 2015 we knew this was an issue too big for Parliament alone to decide, and therefore it was put to the public to exercise direct democracy. As we know the nation voted to leave the EU – but in the absence of any manifesto stipulating what leaving the EU actually meant, the Prime Minister had to interpret the arguments made and respond with a proposal. The deal that was put before Parliament returns control of our borders, laws and spending, provides for an orderly transition, and retains a workable partnership with Europe that will enable us to establish an essential future relationship. Where we are today is not where I wanted us to be. I want to see Britain playing a more influential role on the international stage, at a time when the world around us is getting more dangerous and complex. We are an outward looking country with a history of understanding and resolving the challenges that occur well beyond our shores. So, stepping away from an international organisation, such as the EU, even with the many flaws, does not seem logical. Britain’s strength, developed over millennia is its commitment to democracy. Regardless of my own views it is my democratic duty as an MP to honour the referendum result by supporting this Brexit deal. If this deal is not agreed by Parliament I cannot support Britain walking away with no deal. This would have detrimental impact on our economy, security and international credibility. The deal on the table therefore is the best available in honouring the referendum result. If Parliament cannot agree to support this deal we must recognise that the original mandate to leave (taken over two years ago) will begin to date, and will soon no longer represent a reflection of current intent. Once again I am grateful for constituents getting in touch. The complexity of this debate is reflected in differences of opinion at so many levels. Kind regards,
And here are a bunch of (IMHO) treacherous Remainers who are doing everything they can to keep us in the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic, German-run EU:
David Craig, on January 23rd, 2019
