Our rulers are busy making up new definitions of Izlumophobia in order to suppress any criticism of our wonderfullest, most favouritest religion.
Here’s the latest version from a few councils:
• Calling for, aiding, instigating or justifying the killing or harming of Muslims in the name of a racist/fascist ideology, or an extremist view of religion.
• Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims as such, or of Muslims as a collective group, such as, especially but not exclusively, conspiracies about Muslim entryism in politics, government or other societal institutions; the myth of Muslim identity having a unique propensity for terrorism and claims of a demographic ‘threat’ posed by Muslims or of a ‘Muslim takeover’.
• Accusing Muslims as a group of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Muslim person or group of Muslim individuals, or even for acts committed by non-Muslims.
• Accusing Muslims as a group, or Muslim majority states, of inventing or exaggerating Islamophobia, ethnic cleansing or genocide perpetrated against Muslims.
Community or to their countries of origin, or to the alleged priorities of Muslims worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
• Denying Muslim populations, the right to self-determination e.g., by claiming that the existence of an independent Palestine or Kashmir is a terrorist endeavour.
• Applying double standards by requiring of Muslims behaviours that are not expected or demanded of any other groups in society, eg loyalty tests.
• Using the symbols and images associated with classic Islamophobia.
• Holding Muslims collectively responsible for the actions of any Muslim majority state, whether secular or constitutionally Islamic.
And now from someone who knows what they’re talking about
But here’s someone who probably knows more about our bestest most loved religion than those progressive libtard idiots who are trying to extend the definition of Izlumophobia to crush any semblance of free speech.
In his weekly fatwa session, which he uploads to his YouTube channel, Kuwaiti cleric Othman Al-Khamis said that apostates must be killed. In a video uploaded on January 9, 2019, Sheikh Al-Khamis said that apostasy is tantamount to scorning Islam. In an October 14, 2015 video, Sheikh Al-Khamis said that only infidels may be enslaved, adding that people who do not worship Allah must convert to Islam, pay the jizya poll tax, be forced into slavery, or be fought against and killed.
If we’re to believe that this fine and wise cleric knows slightly more about the happiest and most peacefullest religion in the world than progressive British libtards, then it’s not a phobia when they tell you they want to forcibly convert you and, if you refuse to convert, they want to oppress you, enslave you or kill you:
This weekend I’d like to introduce you to Hewad Shivzad. It’s just possible that the BBC and C4 News and all the other mainstream media will decide that Hewad Shivzad’s story isn’t newsworthy.
This young chap, Hewad Shivzad, is just 19 years old. Here he is:
What I mean is that he claims to be just 19 years old. Hewad Shivzad claims to be 19 years old now because, when he originally entered the UK to claim asylum in March 2017, he said he was just 17 years old. This hugely increased his chances of being granted leave to remain as a supposed ‘vulnerable child’.
You or I might be tempted to think that this fine fellow, Hewad Shivzad, looks to be at least 30. But the Home Office and immigration authorities never do medical checks on would-be child migrants to establish their real age as that would be waaaccciiissssttt. So we have to accept that Hewad Shivzad is 19 years old as he claims. This mirrors the fiasco when Britain was forced by pressure from virtue-signalling progressive libtards to take in a bunch of supposed ‘child refugees’ from Calais. Most of these ‘child refugees looked to be rather older than children:
Talking of children, let me explain the contribution multi-cultural enricher Hewad Shivzad has made to our once great country.
Hewad Shivzad isolated a primary school-age girl and lured her away to subject her to a sexual attack lasting 30 to 40 minutes. He ignored her pleas for him to stop, sexually assaulted her and forced himself on her, Teesside Crown Court heard. If the girl was of primary-school age, then she would have been anything from 5 to 11 years old at the time Hewad Shivzad decided to give her a jolly good dose of multi-cultural enrichment.
A judge said the victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was a blameless, charming, innocent and “innately kind” girl. She read out a moving statement from the girl’s mother, who said: “I’m worried that this will have ruined her life.” The mum said the rape massively affected her daughter, leading to anger, violent behaviour and harming herself. “We are really struggling as a family,” she added. “She talks about what happened all the time. I think that she’s depressed. I really need some help for her.”
Hewad Shivzad has been sent to prison. But he’ll probably serve half or less of his supposed 15-year sentence and be out on the streets again in about 7 years or less. As far as I understand, there has been no mention of deporting him when he is released even though he clearly lied about his age to stay in Britain and even though he raped a child of primary-school age.
In his life in Britain, Hewad Shivzad will probably damage many more innocent lives and probably cost us millions of pounds in benefits and policing and prison costs. Yet nobody has considered throwing him out of our country. After all, as the progressive media and the brain-dead, virtue-signalling snowflakes produced by our failing learn-nothing schools and safe-space universities keep telling us:
Though the parents of tens of thousands of raped and abused girls might not agree with the progressive libtards that the Third-World detritus our rulers are so enthusiastically importing to turn our boring, white monocultural country into a thriving, diverse multi-cultural paradise are quite as harmless as the virtue-signalling elites claim.
I had always thought that the primary duty of any government is to protect its own people. It is not to give a life of luxury, with almost unlimited money and sex, to every piece of parasitic, pig-ignorant, illiterate, low-IQ, unemployable, deeply criminal, rape-obsessed Third-World sh*t who decides to come here.
It’s clear from Hewad Shivzad’s story and thousands of similar cases that our government has failed in this most basic duty.
For years supposed ‘comedians’ on the BBC and other channels have ‘entertained’ us by mocking anyone with views that aren’t leftist, progressive, virtue-signalling, rapemigrant-hugging and politically correct.
But finally a comedy sketch has emerged that dares ridicule the progressive, lefty, #metoo, snowflake idiots who have turned our democracy into an idiocracy.
The sketch isn’t great but it’s at least a small glimpse of hope as we descend into sheep-like snowflake madness:
I want you to imagine the population of the UK doubling every 20 years. Officially there are just over 66 million people living in the UK. But if you include all the unregistered illegal immigrants, the real figure is probably comfortably over 70 million. However, for the purposes of this exercise, let’s accept the official 66 million figure.
So, if the UK population doubled every 20 years we’d have about 132 million people by 2040 and around 264 million by 2060. It should be more than blindingly obvious to anyone except a progressive, liberal, rapefugee-hugging moron that such population growth would be utterly disastrous. There would be mass unemployment, widespread poverty, most people would be living in overcrowded slums and there would be constant civil war as different ethnic groups fought over limited resources of food, water and space, while the rich would retreat into well-guarded, fortress-like compounds. Britain with 264 million people (or even 132 million) would be a dystopia that would make Soylent Green look like girl guides’ picnic.
Fortunately, Britain’s population is not doubling every 20 years. But the population of Crapistan is;
In fact, the population of practically every Asian and African sh*thole is doubling every 20 or so years:
When writing about poverty and famine and floods and earthquakes and suchlike, the one word the media never use is “self-inflicted”. Africa is NOT poor. Africa is one of the richest continents in the world. Africa has massive resources of land, water and minerals. But most Africans live in abject poverty. Why? Because there are too many of them and because their populations are growing much faster than their economies.
“Help” scream Oxfam and Save the Children and Unicef’s well-paid bosses and kiddy-fiddling staff, “give us more money to help the poor Africans”. After World War II under the Marshall Plan, Europe received about $20 billion (in today’s money) over 5 years to aid rebuilding. Since massive aid started flowing into Africa in the mid 1960s, Africa has received about $20 billion (in today’s money) every 5 years – equivalent to ten Marshall Plans. The result – more Africans live in excremental cesspit poverty than they did before the huge flows of foreign aid started.
What about famines?
“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about famines? We need to help people affected by famines“. Rubbish. For example, there is a lack of rainfall in the Horn of Africa every 7 to 10 years. This is completely predictable and could be planned for. But it could only be planned for if Ethiopia and Somalia and Sudan etc had growing economies that could support their people. But all these sh*tholes have are rapidly growing populations that no reasonable amount of foreign aid can ever adequately feed, clothe and house. As I keep repeating, in 1964 or whenever it was that Saint Bob did his BandAid thingy, there were about 40 million Ethiopians, now there are about 100 million. And by 2040 there will be about 200 million. How are you going to find jobs, homes and food for all of those people?
What about floods?
“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about floods? We need to help people affected by floods”. Rubbish. The main reason there are often devastating floods in the usual Third-World sh*tholes is due to excessive population growth. This leads to deforestation so that, when the rains do come, they are not absorbed into the ground through the trees but instead turn into deadly torrents causing landslides and loss of life. When it was thought London might be flooded, the Thames Barrier was built between 1974 and 1984. Most floods can be avoided if a country has the resources and money.
What about civil war?
“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about civil war? We need to help people affected by civil wars”. Rubbish. Most civil wars start when there are too many people fighting over too few resources – land, food, water etc. If there were fewer people and thus more resources available for each person, probably most civil wars wouldn’t happen.
It’s population control we need, not aid!
As long as sh*thole countries double their populations every 20 or so years we will have misery, poverty, war and other disasters. This misery is mostly self-inflicted! But this is something the useless, biased, ever so progressive mainstream media will never admit.
In the last 30 years, with their one-child policy, the Chinese have managed to take over 600 million people out of poverty. In the last 30 years, due to their explosive population growth, our friends in Africa have managed to push another 600 million people into poverty
We need to stop giving foreign aid and charity to these countries with rapidly-growing populations. All we’re doing is encouraging yet more unsustainable population growth. Instead we need to set conditions on all foreign aid and charity money – that only countries with active birth control programmes will receive our help.
But we can’t do this as we would be accused of “neo-colonialism” and “neo-imperialism” and, of course, the old favourite “racism”.
So, we can’t stop Africa’s and all the Sh*tistans’ population explosion. In fact, through foreign aid and charities, we’re actually encouraging it. And when their failed sh*thole countries inevitably collapse, millions of these people will flood into Europe, overwhelm us and destroy what’s left of our civilisation:
On Thursday/Friday, I featured an article from the Gatestone Institute about how migrant grooming/rape gangs had started ‘doing a Rotherham’ in the Finnish town of Oulu. Part of the article I didn’t include went on to discuss why local politicians and the authorities were denying there was a problem and were refusing to take any action, just as Rotherham’s councillors, police and social services also all looked the other way while large gangs of our multi-cultural friends were enthusiastically enriching Rotherham’s underage girls using all the orifices they could find.
But perhaps I’m being unfair to the Finnish authorities. In some towns they seem to be making great efforts to integrate new arrivals. Here are some nice photos successful integration:
And here’s another:
And here’s another:
And here’s a small compilation:
There are plenty more similar photos from Finland available on the Internet.
What kind of parent would allow their young daughters to hang out with much older, migrant men from Africa and the Middle East? Only cowardly, libtard Finns brainwashed by political correctness into believing all cultures are equal when Western European culture is clearly vastly superior to the cultures of the self-inflicted sh*thole countries most of these migrants come from.
Oh, and by the way, the “ota raiskata tyttäremme” in the title of this weekend’s blog means “please rape our daughters” which seems to be the attitude of Finnish politicians, police and social services just as it was in Rotherham, Oxford, Newcastle, Bradford and so many other English towns.
Today I wanted to write about how Islamic terrorism (which, of course, has nothing to do with Islam which is a religion of peace) has been totally stopped in Myanmar while it is increasing in several neighbouring countries. But I suspect such a post would be considered politically-incorrect. So I’ll have to give this story a miss for the time being.
Instead, let’s travel to the small Finnish town of Oulu (population 200,000) which, given recent events, should probably be twinned with Rotherham (population 260,000). Here’s part of an article from the Gatestone Institute describing the happy goings-on in little Oulu:
Finland is a curious place. Tucked up under the arm of its celebrity sister Sweden and with Russia as a neighbour, it is one of the world’s most northern and geographically remote countries. It takes a hardy kind of European to withstand the severe climate. The Finns in Oulu, the most populous city in northern Finland, go about their lives as normal in -25 degrees Fahrenheit.
With a national population of just over 5.5 million, trees easily outnumber people; two-thirds of this country is blanketed in thick woodland, making it the most densely forested country in Europe.
Yet, this strange, seemingly forgotten land has a hideously metropolitan problem: Finland’s daughters are the target of grooming gangs.
In December 2018, Oulu police reported the arrest of seven men accused of repeatedly raping a ten-year-old girl. The police say the girl has allegedly been subjected to multiple sexual assaults over several months in the suspects’ homes.
The men, aged 20 to 40, all arrived in Finland as migrants or refugees in recent years (32,000 sought asylum here during the migrant wave in 2015) and are thought to have made contact with the victim on social media.
Locals in Oulu told Gatestone that many have observed the majority-Muslim migrant gangs in action in the local shopping mall; they send out their best-looking, nicely-scented friends to hook in young Finnish girls. Parents here are fearful for their children.
Finland’s Prime Minister Juha Sipilä took to Twitter to express his shock and anger, writing that “a sexual offence against a child is an inhumane act, and its wickedness cannot be comprehended.”
His naïveté seems startling. Internationally acknowledged studies on grooming gangs in the UK clearly evidence that this is a “wickedness” well-documented and well understood. There is no reason for it to come as a surprise.
His country’s official statistics from 2017 reveal that — nationally — Iraqi and Afghan migrants were represented up to 40 times more amongst sexual assault suspects than native Finns.
In Britain, the 2015 Jay Report into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham was an independent report into how child sexual exploitation (CSE) cases were handled by social services and police. It clearly identified how these grooming gangs operate, the brutality endured by their victims, and the “blatant” failure of police and politicians to act to protect the girls.
The findings in Professor Alexis Jay’s report clearly suggest that the numbers of victims and aggressors in Finland will keep rising as networks are uncovered and more girls have the courage to come forward.
Sure enough, Oulu’s police now suspect 16 foreign-born men of rape or other sexual abuses of girls aged between the ages of 10 and 15, and have added another four men to their investigation.
In addition, police in Finland’s capital, Helsinki, have acknowledged that they have arrested three foreign-born men on similar charges.
It seems cruel to reduce such violations to mere statistics or probability, but the truth can be unkind. Helsinki has a population of 630,000. Oulu’s population is just 200,000. There are two other cities of a similar size in this fridge cabinet of Europe: Turku and Tampere. The UK’s experience teaches us that it is a statistical probability that these cities will not be immune to having their children being targeted by the gangs.
It is a barbaric cruelty these children face. Professor Jay sets it out in black and white in her report:
“In just over a third of cases, children affected by sexual exploitation were previously known to services because of child protection and neglect. It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered. They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten, and intimidated. There were examples of children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone. Girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators.”
It was evidently the “blatant” failings of police and politicians that allowed these men to continue raping and abusing these children; the authorities reportedly remained silent either for political gain or to avoid professional damage.
Much of the coverage of the same problem in Great Britain said that Jay had accused the Rotherham council and police of failing to tackle sexual exploitation because of misplaced “political correctness.” Yet Jay says those are not the words she would use:
“I have an aversion to phrases like that,” she says. Instead, she believes the Labour-dominated council turned a blind eye to the problem because of “their desire to accommodate a community that would be expected to vote Labour, to not rock the boat, to keep a lid on it, to hope it would go away.
What hits hardest in the little town of Oulu in Finland is a disturbing sense that history is repeating itself here and nothing has been learned from the well-documented lessons of the past. Instead there seems to be a hope that with a few overdue statements this problem will go back underground and the noise will go away.
Initial reports suggest that the abused girls and their parents were not necessarily believed; the police responded only after the strong intervention of the father and step-father of one victim, who set a trap for one of the groomers online.
It’s astounding our political elites seem to have no understanding at all about the hell they are unleashing on us through their obsession with allowing/encouraging uncontrolled Third-World immigration. And now, of course, following most countries signing the UN Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration, moving from a Third-World self-inflicted sh*thole to wealthy Western Europe will become a human right – a human right that millions of multi-cultural enrichers will decide to exercise.
There was a nice demonstration of tolerance last week when our friends from the Religion of Peace set off two bombs at a Catholic cathedral in the Philippines. The first bomb killed a few people and then the second bomb was detonated as security forces rushed to help the victims of the first bomb.
But despite that attack, it was a pretty quiet week last week with only 130 killed around the world in Religion of Peace attacks. Though another 276 innocents were injured
In comparison, in 2018 there were 1,976 Islamic attacks in 56 countries, in which 11,769 (226 a week) people were killed and 11,483 injured (221 a week).
In 2017 there were 2,044 Islamic attacks in 61 countries, in which 16,386 (315 a week) people were killed and 14,362 injured (278 a week).
In 2016 there were 2,498 Islamic attacks in 59 countries, in which 21,413 (412 people a week) people were killed and 26,730 injured (514 a week).
Yipee! The world is becoming a much safer place and the Religion of Peace truly is a Religion of Peace.
Well, I think it is.
Date
Country
City
Killed
Injured
Description
2019.01.27
Iraq
al-Shura
2
0
A husband and wife are viciously shot to death in their home by terrorists.
2019.01.27
Iraq
Shirqat
4
8
Two bombs aimed at a bus and first responders leaves four dead.
2019.01.27
Philippines
Jolo
20
82
Twenty worshippers at a Catholic church are laid out by Muslim bombers.
2019.01.27
Burkina Faso
Sirkire
10
2
Jihadists pour machine-gun fire into a village, taking out ten residents.
2019.01.27
Afghanistan
Kandahar
1
0
The prosecutor for a secular court is assassinated by Sharia proponents.
2019.01.26
Yemen
Haradh
8
30
Ansar Allah members fire shells into a displaced persons camp, killing eight unfortunates.
2019.01.26
Afghanistan
Tala Wa Barfak
5
20
A bomb blast at a volleyball court leaves five dead.
2019.01.26
Afghanistan
Jalalabad
1
2
A girl is disassembled by a bomb blast at a university campus.
2019.01.25
Somalia
Afgoye
6
0
Three women are among six people at a market gunned down by Sharia extremists.
2019.01.25
Mali
Douentza
2
1
Two UN peacekeepers succumb to injuries following an al-Qaeda bomb blast.
2019.01.24
Afghanistan
Sayyad
2
4
Sunni militants fire into a playground, killing two people.
2019.01.24
DRC
Beni
3
2
Three innocents are slain by ADF Islamists.
2019.01.24
Iraq
Abu Karma
1
0
An ISIS sniper brings down a civilian.
2019.01.24
Afghanistan
Ghoryan
1
0
A Hajj director is assassinated by Religion of Peace rivals.
2019.01.24
Syria
al-Bab
1
7
A suicide bomber takes out a civilian.
2019.01.23
Somalia
Mogadishu
2
3
An al-Shabaab incendiary device toasts two civilians.
2019.01.23
Iraq
Kirkuk
2
2
A suicide car bomber plow into a checkpoint, killing two local cops.
2019.01.23
Nigeria
Geidam
8
12
At least eight people are left dead after a Boko Haram attack on a college town.
2019.01.22
Pakistan
Ferozabad
1
0
A Shiite cleric is assassinated by Religion of Peace rivals.
2019.01.22
Syria
Latakia
1
14
Terrorists kill a civilian with an IED.
2019.01.22
Syria
Maar Shamarin
1
1
A civilian is murdered in cold blood by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.
2019.01.22
Yemen
Taiz
1
13
A woman is killed by the Ansar Allah group.
2019.01.22
South Africa
Johannesburg
1
0
A critic of Islamic extremism is gunned down outside a mosque.
2019.01.21
Afghanistan
Kabul
36
58
A Taliban suicide attack on a military base kills thirty-six.
2019.01.21
Syria
Rifqa
3
1
Three people are exterminated by a Fedayeen suicide bomber.
2019.01.21
Iraq
Abu Saida
2
1
Two Iraqis are shot to death by Mujahideen.
2019.01.21
Syria
Hasakeh
5
2
Fedayeen suicide car bombers kill five people.
2019.01.21
Kenya
Garissa
0
1
A woman is injured when Somali Islamists attack a construction company.
Apologies to those of you who have already seen this story. But I thought it was so brilliant that it would be worth mentioning it again here in case anyone missed it.
I have just read the most grovelling and humiliating apology by a newspaper I have ever seen. It appeared in the Daily Telegraph.
I don’t know the whole story. But what I understand is that the Telegraph features desk loathe democratically-elected US President Donald Trump almost as much as all the other London-based, self-regarding, politically-correct, narcissistic, mainstream media progressives and decided to do an article denigrating Trump. I’m sure the Telegraph could have written what they wanted about Trump – that he’s a Russian spy or an alien sent to destroy the Earth or whatever – and Trump would have just put it down to Trump Derangement Syndrome and ignored it. But, in their wisdom, the Telegraph features desk decided to do a hatchet job on Trump’s wife, Melania.
How they must have laughed and congratulated themselves at the Telegraph features desk when they published their hatchet job. Unfortunately for the Telegraph’s features desk and the Telegraph’s owners, the newspaper made a big mistake by attacking the President’s wife. Because Trump is no ordinary politician. He’s a real man and real men fight to defend their families.
And so it came to pass. It seems that Trump decided to send in the lawyers to kick ass at the Telegraph. Here’s the result – the grovelling, humiliating Telegraph apology:
Following last Saturday’s (Jan 19) Telegraph magazine cover story “The mystery of Melania”, we have been asked to make clear that the article contained a number of false statements which we accept should not have been published. Mrs Trump’s father was not a fearsome presence and did not control the family. Mrs Trump did not leave her Design and Architecture course at University relating to the completion of an exam, as alleged in the article, but rather because she wanted to pursue a successful career as a professional model. Mrs Trump was not struggling in her modelling career before she met Mr Trump, and she did not advance in her career due to the assistance of Mr Trump.
We accept that Mrs Trump was a successful professional model in her own right before she met her husband and obtained her own modelling work without his assistance. Mrs Trump met Mr Trump in 1998, not in 1996 as stated in the article. The article also wrongly claimed that Mrs Trump’s mother, father and sister relocated to New York in 2005 to live in buildings owned by Mr Trump. They did not. The claim that Mrs Trump cried on election night is also false.
We apologise unreservedly to The First Lady and her family for any embarrassment caused by our publication of these allegations. As a mark of our regret we have agreed to pay Mrs Trump substantial damages as well as her legal costs.
The article, written by Nina Burleigh, who works for Newsweek as national politics correspondent, was an excerpt of her upcoming book Golden Handcuffs: The Secret History of Trump’s Women.
In April 2017, another British newspaper, Daily Mail, agreed to pay damages to Melania Trump over published allegations regarding her modeling career. The payout was around $3 million, according to the BBC
Ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! Trump is amazing. He just keeps winning.
As for the pathetic Telegraph, they immediately went back on the attack against Trump with a story headlined #TrumpCaved: President slammed as ‘wimp’ by wall supporters after shutdown capitulation
It does seem as if Trump has backed down over the US government shutdown and funding for the border wall. And, of course, the Democrats will use the next two years to try to sabotage everything Trump does rather than trying to work with him for the benefit of the American people. But this sabotage may turn out to be disastrous for the Democrats should Trump decide to run for president again. It will expose them for what they are – hateful, self-obsessed, self-regarding, virtue-signalling, treacherous globalists with no interest at all in helping ordinary American voters.
Hopefully this will lead to another four years of one of the best presidents America has ever had.
Writing an almost daily blog can take up a fair bit of time. First you have to think of a story. Then in my case I try to find some facts and figures that back up that story. Like, for example, exposing the “black lives matter” protesters for the progressive, liberal, lying frauds they are as 93% of all black Americans murdered are killed, not by evil white racists, but by other black Americans.
So it’s quite disheartening to have abuse thrown at me such as:
You really don’t understand much do you? It is not about who wins. It is about exchange of ideas, not insults. You seem to put everybody in the same box, so all gays are bum boys, all Muslims are rapists and killers, all blacks have a low IQ, etc. And if a criticism from me makes you give up the blog it does not say much for your belief in your ideas. I haven’t checked your blog, but the fact that you have chosen to contact me privately rather than through your blog shows how weak you are.
And:
Thanks for picking up on my comment, but as usual taken completely out of context and the conclusion is wrong. I have never read the Guardian and it should be quite obvious if you read any of my comments that my views are libertarian. As I said, you are losing the plot and are unable to accept that your previous post was wrong in its assumptions and offensive in the extreme. It is a pity that you did not close down this blog when you promised to do so when people were not buying your book. You behave like a spoilt child when your views are challenged.
But I guess the problem with the politically-correct is they seldom have any facts on their side. So they usually try to win every argument by resorting to ludicrous exaggeration and personal insults.
Trump was right – yet again
When democratically-elected President Donald Trump pulled the US out of Saint Obama’s hideously one-sided agreement with Iran allowing Iran to keep on developing nuclear weapons, there were the usual howls of protest from the EU’s and UK’s politicians and media. Apparently the EU’s and UK’s politicians believe you can trust the Iranian leaders, that the Iranian leaders are really peaceful sorts of people (the kind you’d be happy to invite round to your house for dinner and a chat) and that they’re only joking when they keep promising to kill all the Jews and wipe Israel off the map.
And of course, we shouldn’t mention that the Iranian government has admitted that over 800,000 Iranian children are suffering from malnutrition which is severely affecting their physical and mental development while the ever so peaceful Iranian government spend billions on arming and training Jeremy Corbyn’s equally peaceful chums at Hezbollah.
But in an interview on 22 January 2019, Iran’s Nuclear Chief Salehi boasts: We Had Secretly Purchased Replacements for Nuclear Equipment That the JCPOA Had Required Us to Destroy; Yellowcake Production Facilities are Operational; We Are Advancing in Nuclear Propulsion.”
Ali Akbar Salehi, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, was interviewed on Channel 4 TV (Iran) on January 22, 2019. He said that the negotiations surrounding the JCPOA had required Iran to destroy the Arak reactor’s calandria by filling it with cement, but that Iran had secretly acquired replacement tubes ahead of time so that the reactor’s functionality would not be ultimately affected. He also said that pictures that had circulated that showed the Arak reactor’s pit filled with cement had been photoshopped. In addition, Salehi said that the yellowcake production facilities in Ardakan are operational and that Iran has been authorized to produce two additional IR-8 centrifuges. Salehi added that Iran has advanced rapidly in the field of nuclear propulsion.
It looks like Trump was right about Iran (as usual) and Israel is going to have to nuke Iran back to the Stone Age (it doesn’t have far to go) if Israel is to survive.
If it is true that Iran has been cheating on its obligations and continued developing nukes, then that’s quite an important story. But I doubt you’ll see this reported on the Trump-loathing, Israel-hating, Izlumophiliac BBC.
A partial transcript of the interview is available here:
I’ll just start with a comment from a reader “Craig seems to be getting more and more extreme and if he has anything useful to say he now fails to get the message across.” Hopefully that reader will go back to the Guardian and not waste his valuable time on my obviously pointless ranting.
Do black lives matter to lefties?
Often when a black American (usually a man) is gunned down by US police, there are riots and “Black lives matter protests”. This is understandable. But this also fails to take account of the context that in the US blacks make up around 12% of the population and yet commit 52.5% percent or murders
(Up till 2008, Hispanics were included in the statistics as “white”)
As most murders are committed by black men, who make up just around 6% of the population, you are almost ten times as likely to be killed by a black man in the US than by a white man. While this doesn’t excuse the police shooting black men, it may partially explain why they may appear a bit ‘trigger happy’ when faced with a black man they believe to be an offender. The police have a right to go home to their families alive each evening and a right to defend themselves if they think their lives are being threatened
But perhaps more importantly, although blacks make up around 12% of the population, they account for about 47% of murder victims. So, if black lives mattered to progressive, virtue-signalling lefties surely they should be protesting against the massive loss of black American lives at the hands of black Americans? After all, very few black Americans are killed by white Americans.
So, black lives matter to lefties when blacks are killed by whites (just 7% of murders of black Americans). But black lives don’t seem to matter to lefties when Afro-Americans are killed by Afro-Americans (93% of black American murders).
Who goes to prison in the US?
Another possibly interesting statistic is the percentage of each racial group incarcerated in US prisons:
About 4.7% of black American males are in prison compared to around 1.8% of Hispanic men and just 0.7% of white men. Of course, lefties would explain this away by claiming this was proof that the US justice system was racist. But other people might be tempted to attribute these figures to the fact that blacks and Hispanics are more likely to commit crimes than white Americans. And as we’re seeing in London, where multi-culturally enriching Mayor Khan tries to turn our capital city into a cross between Lagos and Lahore, ever more diversity leads to the collapse of traditional communities, a lack of trust and ever-rising crime.
Why oh why oh why?
So, the big question – why are ethnic minorities more likely to commit crime than people of white European descent? The quick pop-up answer from the lefties is that people from ethnic minorities are more likely to be socially and economically disadvantaged and therefore crime is a result of poverty.
But why are they more likely to be socially and economically disadvantaged and more likely to be poor? Is it because people of white European background are racist (which is what most lefties would claim)? Or could it have anything to do with their average IQ levels?
After all, anyone with an IQ of less than 90 is unlikely to be able to function in a modern Western society.
I have no opinions on the matter as having an opinion could be classed as “hate thought”
David Craig, on February 10th, 2019
