Somewhere in Crapistan, persecuted Christian Aasia Bibi is rotting away having been supposedly freed after 8 years condemned to death for supposedly ‘insulting the prophet’.
Whenever Third-world detritus wants to come to Britain, we’re told we must accept them because of Britain’s supposed ‘historical links’ to whatever sh*t-hole the often violent, often low-IQ, often illiterate, usually unemployable, usually West-hating, democracy-loathing people come from:
And there are plenty of virtue-signalling, braindead snowflakes who’ll demand we take in whatever human and subhuman garbage that washes up on our shores:
But when a Christian gets into a bit of trouble, our surrender to the Religion of Peace is so comprehensive that our Religion of Peace Home Secretary refuses to give this Christian asylum in Britain. As for the virtue-signalling, braindead snowflakes, I haven’t heard many of them demanding we give asylum to Crapistani Christian Aasia Bibi. In fact, I suspect the progressive lefties (and our Home Secretary) hope that Aasia Bibi is killed as soon as possible as she’s an embarrassment to them because her very existence exposes their hypocrisy and their hatred of Western civilisation.
Here are a couple of other examples of Britain’s surrender to the Religion of Wonderfulness:
Legal aid:
January 1. Four British jihadis, sentenced to life in prison for planning a major terror attack in Birmingham, received nearly £800,000 (€900,000; $1 million) in taxpayer-funded legal aid to cover their failed defense, according to information obtained through a freedom of information request. Khobaib Hussain, 25, Naweed Ali, 30, Mohibur Rahman, 33, and Tahir Aziz, 38, received £790,485 to pay for lawyers. Some £635,822 went to the trial lawyers; each of the defendants was represented by a Queen’s Counsel and junior barrister. The billing process is not yet complete; the final figure likely to be higher.
We keep being told that legal aid budgets are being cut. But I guess this just applies to taxpaying, white indigenous Brits. If you’re a multi-cultural enricher, you can apparently have as much legal aid as you want.
Social care:
Another budget that is being cut is that for social care. So, many of Britain’s elderly are being left to rot without proper support in spite of having worked and paid taxes for most of their lives. But if you’re a 25- to 35-year-old multi-cultural enricher pretending to be just 16 or 17 years old, there’s plenty of money available for you.
January 3. Each lone child migrant in Britain costs taxpayers nearly £70,000 a year — £67,634 —according to the Association of Directors of Children’s Services. Expenses include £50,716 for residential placement and linked care costs, £4,805 for education, £3,915 for healthcare and £3,826 for social workers. For each lone child migrant, councils also typically pay £440 for interpreters and child advocates, £480 for English language lessons, £70 for dentists and £20 for doctor registration. Home Office statistics show that there are currently at least 4,500 unaccompanied youngsters seeking asylum in Britain — and costing taxpayers more than £300 million a year. Town halls are legally responsible for all costs associated with each child under their care until they are 25.
But if you dare criticise the preferential treatment of multi-cultural enrichers compared to the way taxpaying Brits are treated/neglected, then you’re immediately branded as a racist and bigot and a Nazi and a fascist and worse.
They say that you can find out who really rules you by finding out who you are not allowed to criticise. We are not allowed to criticise anyone or anything from the Religion of Total Peacefulness. I think that tells us all we really need to know about who really rules Britain:
Ever since their infamous “Hockey Stick” graph was shown to be based on fraudulent data, the Himalayan glaciers didn’t melt as predicted and the earth stopped warming more than 15 years ago, the Warmists have been desperately looking for a new weapon with which to attack anyone who didn’t subscribe to their Man-Made Global Warming cult.
The Warmists found their greatest weapon of mass deception when some guy called Cook (or should that be “Crook”?) published a study claiming that about “97% of scientists agreed that Global Warming was caused by human activity” (Anthropogenic Global warming – AGW). There’s only one problem – Mr Cook was (IMHO) either a liar or a buffoon.
Mr Cook’s group looked through the abstracts of 25 years of articles about supposed Global Warming – they didn’t read the actual articles! Based on just a few lines of each abstract (not the full article), they classed each article into one of 7 categories ranging from articles that appeared to endorse the AGW theory to those that rejected it.
The results were as follows:
1. Endorsed AGW with quantification – 65
2. Endorsed with no quantification – 934
3. “Implicit” endorsement – 2,934
4. Uncertain – 8,269
5. “Implicit” rejection – 53
6. Reject without quantification – 15
7. Reject with quantification – 10.
Total papers included – 12,280.
Then Mr Cook’s group did something very clever/dishonest (delete as appropriate). They took out the 8,269 papers which didn’t take a position. That left 3,933 papers which possibly endorsed the AGW theory and just 78 which rejected it. So suddenly you have just 4,011 papers which expressed an opinion and of these 3,933 (97%) could be interpreted as endorsing the AGW theory. This is madness. This is an absurd abuse of all mathematical and scientific processes.
Let’s look at the figures another way. There were 12,280 papers discussing supposed Global Warming. Of these, a minuscule 65 (0.5%) endorsed the AGW theory and were confident enough to quantify by how much the earth would warm. Then there were just 934 (7.6%) which endorsed the AGW theory, but were not confident enough to make any numerical predictions about the expected warming. So, we actually have a pathetic 8.1% that explicitly backed up the theory of AGW. This is laughable! And it’s rather far away from the claimed 97%!
Then we have a big bunch – 2,934 scientific papers (23.9%) – which Mr Cook’s group (perhaps creatively?) interpreted as “implicitly” supporting the AGW theory. So in total, out of the 12,280 abstracts reviewed, a mere 3,933 (32%) explicitly or “implicitly” could be interpreted as supporting the AGW theory and the rest (68%) either didn’t express an opinion or else disputed the AGW theory.
So, to claim that 97% of scientists agreed that humans were responsible for supposed Global Warming is utterly ludicrous. As usual with figures used by the Warmists, there seems to have been blatant manipulation of the data to prove a point that the data didn’t actually support.
It’s a pity that none of the politicians and journalists who have parroted the “97% claim” bothered to look at the original figures as I have done.
But there’s one thing we can be sure of – at least 97% of the gullible idiots being produced by today’s Snowflake Indoctrination Centres (schools and universities) are utterly convinced that world-renowned climatologist Chicken Little’s predictions are correct.
Here’s Paul Joseph Watson to start off the year. He helpfully shows that being a holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, self-righteous, naive, snowflake, rapefugee-hugging lefty idiot can seriously damage your health.
But where do all these holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, self-righteous, naive, snowflake, rapefugee-hugging, lefty idiots come from? Here’s a clue: our universities, which have been transformed into snowflake indoctrination centers for the mentally gullible. Young people graduating from university today probably know less than they did before they entered ‘uni’. At their beloved ‘uni’ they become experts in anti-knowledge, or “fake facts” that they think are true.
For example, nearly all college graduates today believe that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant that will destroy the planet. Yet any honest scientist who graduated a generation earlier will confirm that carbon dioxide is the single most important nutrient for plants, responsible for the “greening” of rainforests, food crops, grasslands and even aquatic ecosystems. CO2 is the molecule of life, yet college graduates have been indoctrinated with anti-knowledge that claims CO2 is a poison.
As for different cultures, our universities and progressive media have brainwashed the gullible into believing that white Western-European culture is somehow responsible for all the evils in the world and that cultures like our mostest favouritest wonderfullest religion are as good as, if not superior to, Western culture.
As Paul Joseph Watson so admirably shows, when one of these indoctrinated, progressive, snowflakes meets reality, the results are often not pretty – for the lefty, rapefugee-hugging snowflake.
This is just to say that I have seen the video of one of the Scandinavian girls being beheaded in Morocco by our friends from the world’s most wonderfullest, peacefullest religion.
It is brutal. One of the men puts a foot on the poor girl’s head while another cuts her throat while she is screaming. Then the throat-cutter starts hacking away at the girl’s neck to remove her head completely. It seems the knife he is using is quite blunt as this takes some time before the head is fully removed. I suspect that all this time, the girl is still alive and can feel what’s happening to her. But she can no longer scream in agony as her vocal cords have been cut through. In the meantime, gurgling sounds are coming from the girl as her blood gushes out while the men talk and laugh while one hacks and hacks and hacks away at the girl’s neck with the blunt knife till the girl’s head is eventually severed from her body. The men then toss the severed head onto the ground
I won’t provide the link as this would probably make me guilty of breaking some law or other – Izlumophobia, waaacisssm, who knows? I do know that in Sweden, sharing this video can get you up to four years in prison. Yet returning ISIS fighters get new identities, free homes, free money, free everything despite the many people they will have beheaded, mutilated, crucified, burnt alive and murdered in the name of their god.
I believe we were told that only one of the girls had been beheaded. But I have seen pictures of both girls’ severed heads, so I suspect that, as usual, we’re not getting the whole truth. In fact, I suspect that if the attackers had not uploaded this video of the beheading themselves, we would never have found out that one (or both) girls was/were beheaded. Instead, the brutal nature of their deaths would have been covered up to protect you know who.
I also know that in Sweden it was reported that the murders had nothing to do with our loveliest religion and that the girls had died from ‘knife wounds to the neck’. Yup, I guess that’s one way of describing having your head being hacked off with a blunt knife in a process taking several, no doubt agonising and terrifying, minutes
It’s a funny old world when communicating an atrocity by our friends from our favouritest religion is considered almost as great a (and in Sweden a greater) offence than the atrocity itself.
Rather than being desperately censored by our supine rulers (who are so afraid of Izlum they won’t give asylum to Pakistani Christian Aasia Bibi), perhaps this video of the Scandinavian girl’s brutal beheading should be played on every TV channel and in every school in the country so we can face up to the truth about the greatest threat Western civilisation has ever faced. This would be better than sleep-walking to our extinction.
(p.s. About a week after writing this, I finally found out that both girls had in fact been beheaded. I’m not sure that any of the UK mainstream media have reported this. I believe that, if the murderers had not posted a video of one of the beheadings, then we would have been told that the girls had died in a ‘hiking accident’ or something like that. After all, you know what is a religion of peace so it would have been impossible for members of this great religion to slaughter two beautiful, life-enhancing girls in such an awful way)
You might as well sign it as that will give our politicians yet another popular request to ignore.
It’s probably time to pack up for Christmas and I’ll be back on Friday 4th January.
In the meantime, here’s delightful video (apologies at having used this before) made following last Christmas’s truck attack at a Berlin Christmas market.
Now that the UK has signed the United Nations Global Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration, perhaps these attacks will happen every month or even weekly or daily rather than just once a year? That’s something to look forward to in addition to all the rapes, robberies, murders and other delights that multi-cultural enrichment is bringing to our once great, but increasingly Third-World, country.
In the meantime, I wish you all a very merry Jihadmas and a blood-soaked New Year
Last week there was a so-called “EuroWeek” event held (surprisingly) in Poland to encourage the integration of supposed ‘refugees’. Reportedly the event was in part funded by a George Soros charity.
Here’s a lovely picture from the event:
And here’s another:
And another:
And another:
And here are some more:
There are no prizes for any readers who can see a certain common theme running through these wonderful photos of integration.
Anyway, apparently the event has been a huge success and Dariusz Matecki, a member of the ruling Law and Justice (PiS) party, released a recording of a girl claiming that a young girl who had participated in EuroWeek had been sent lewd messages by one of the migrant men participants, saying he had sent pictures of his genitals to her, Polish broadcaster TVP reports.
“One of my friends made contact with him, of course, having no sexual basis, she just wrote to him. And he started sending her videos, how he masturbated, he started sending her pictures of his penis,” the girl said.
Judging from what has happened in Britain in Rotherham and Rochdale and Oxford and Newcastle and pretty much every town and city that has been multi-culturally enriched
a few pictures of an enricher masturbating is small beer compared to what’s coming for these girls.
So I’m tempted to quote those famous words from Bachman Turner Overdrive “b-b-b-b-babe you ain’t seen nothing yet. Here’s something you’ll never forget. You just ain’t been around.”
There was one rather humorous aspect of this week’s terrorist attack in France. By attacking a Christmas market, you would have thought that our friend from the Religion of Peace would only slaughter us worthless, cursed infidels. But one of the four dead was actually a refugee from Afghanistan who had fled to France to escape the murderous Taliban. So the idiot terrorist managed to murder one of his own while trying to kill us. He-he-he-he!
Anyway, let’s move on to some simple arithmetic. There are around 6 million members of the Religion of Peace in France:
Of these 6 million, around 25,000 are on the police’s terrorist watch-list as posing a serious threat to us infidel swine. So 0.4% of France’s Religion of Peace population are believed by the authorities to be a real and serious danger to the public.
There are about 5 million members of the Religion of Peace in Britain. Of these around 23,000 are on the police’s terrorism watch-list – that’s over 0.4%. But it’s similar to France’s 0.4%. So, maybe we’re beginning to see something of a pattern here?
In Germany there are about 5 million members of the utmostly wonderfullest religion of all. A 2017 report by Germany’s domestic intelligence service noted that there are 25,810 “potentially Islamist individuals” in Germany. That’s around 0.5% of the German Religion of Peace population. Ooops, more of a pattern. In fact, taking these three data points, it starts to become reasonable to assume that somewhere between 0.4% and 0.5% of Europe’s most peaceful population are suspected of wanting to slaughter us worse-than-pigs infidels.
Overall in Europe, there are around 30,000,000 members of the world’s favourite and most peacefullest religion. If we assume that between 0.4% and 0.5% want to stab, behead, drive a truck over us or shoot us, that gives an army of somewhere between 120,000 and 150,000 individuals who would like to do us considerable harm. This would make Europe’s most dangerous members of the Religion of Peace the 6th largest military force in Europe:
Oh dear. That’s not so good.
And here’s the brilliant Brigitte Gabriel explaining why all it needs is a small minority to cause chaos, war and slaughter: (she uses quite different percentages of radicals to me as she’s including the 50 or so sh*tholes like Crapistan and Egypt and Syria and Algeria and Iran and Iraq etc etc where the crazies really hate us because we’re more intelligent, more hard-working, more successful and more civilised than they are and will ever be)
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.”
― H.L. Mencken
Henry Louis Mencken (September 12, 1880 – January 29, 1956) was an American journalist, essayist, satirist, cultural critic and scholar of American English
From salmonella in eggs to BSE, from the Millennium Bug to bird flu, from DDT to passive smoking, from asbestos to the Remainer establishment’s Project Fear, from populism to Izlumophobia to the Russians apparently running our elections, ‘scares’ seem to have become one of the most conspicuous and damaging features of our modern world.
Each of the major scares of the past few decades has followed a remarkably consistent pattern. A crucial role is played in each case by publicity-hungry and grant-seeking scientists or other ‘experts’ like economists who have misread or manipulated the evidence; by the media (especially the BBC and C4 News), lobbyists and gravy-train-riders who eagerly promote the scare without regard to the facts; and finally by the politicians and officials who come up with an absurdly disproportionate response, leaving us all to pay a colossal price, which may run into billions or even hundreds of billions of pounds. And now we’re faced with the greatest scare of them all, the real biggy, the great kahuna, the scare to end all scares – the claim that the world and humanity and, of course, polar bears all face disaster through supposed man-made global warming.
The ‘threat’ of man-made global warming is apparently so serious that no fewer than 22,000 politicians and ‘experts’ and ‘opinion leaders’ from about 190 countries had to fly to somewhere in Poland last week, many of them travelling First Class, to discuss what should be done to save us all. How 22,000 people from about 190 countries can have a useful and sensible discussion is beyond me. Having managed teams for over 20 years, I’ve never found any group over about 10 people can be really effective. But apparently it was absolutely necessary that all 22,000 were there thanks to us ordinary plebs picking up the cost of their (often luxury) travel, limousines, hotels, meals and no doubt, generous contributions to Poland’s and Eastern Europe’s prostitution industry.
There are two questions over the great Global Warming scare/scam:
is the Earth actually warming?
if the Earth is actually warming, has human activity any influence on this warming?
I’m not going to discuss and debunk the great Global Warming scam here. There are plenty of watchable videos on YouTube which do that better than I ever could.
H.L. Mencken also wrote:
“The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule”.
This pretty much sums up how the globalist ruling elites keep increasing their power over us.
Though the Mencken quote I like best is:
“In a war there are always ten times as many heroes as there are soldiers”
However with the French, Dutch, Belgians, Danes, Italians, Spaniards, Greeks and all the others who have ganged up to humiliate Britain over our feeble attempts to leave the undemocratic, globalist, corrupt, Western-culture-hating, migration-encouraging, fascist, German-run EU, perhaps the quote should be more like:
“We always do what the Germans order us to do because in our countries there are ten times as many spineless cowards as there are people”.
My apologies for not writing anything sensible for a few days. But a family situation has arisen which readers might find interesting.
My current wife works at a care home for residents with severe dementia and has been summoned to a disciplinary hearing which will probably result in her being fired. Here is what happened:
1. For some time this care home has been under pressure due mainly to staff shortages
2. This has necessitated the frequent use of agency staff
3. The company running the care home boast on their website about the high level of care provided by their well-trained staff and the care home is among the more expensive of its type
4. However, many of the agency staff have possibly received only 2 to 3 days training and therefore cannot be considered to be as well-trained as full-time staff. Moreover, agency staff often are less effective due to unfamiliarity with how the care group operates and may also have motivational problems.
5. Due to the pressure on staff to complete all their duties despite being constantly under pressure from under-staffing, a number of bad practices developed at the care home which led to complaints from several residents’ families and the eventual departure of the manager from a job that she repeatedly said she ‘loved’.
6. A new manager has now been sent in to sort out the issues at this care home and ensure the standard of care meets the care group’s claimed levels.
7. While carrying out care on a resident, two carers (my wife and a young man on his second day at work) were faced with a difficult situation. Half-way through being changed, the resident, who was well-known as having behavioural problems, started to get agitated. The two carers had to decide whether to stop changing the resident out of her soiled pad and clothes and thus leave her lying in her own excrement thus risking being accused of not providing proper care or to continue changing the resident out of her soiled pad to make her comfortable and avoid having her lie in her own excrement for several hours more. The two carers made the decision to continue changing the resident to make her comfortable. While my wife cleaned the resident, young man talked to the resident to calm her down and placed a towel over her hands to prevent her hitting and scratching the carers and from injuring herself. No harm was done to the resident, no ambulance was called, no doctors needed to attend and there was no bruising or any other signs of harm on the resident. Nevertheless, in the view of the care home management, the two carers made the wrong decision and should have left the resident lying in her own excrement. And now a disciplinary hearing has been organised against one of the carers my wife for supposedly wrongly using restraint on a vulnerable resident
8. Some of the accusations that are being leveled at my wife are totally untrue and may constitute slander/libel. For example, my wife is accused of placing a towel over the resident’s hands to prevent her harming the carers or herself. Yet the report of the incident makes it quite clear that it was the young man who placed a towel over the resident’s hands and that my wife did not do this. Yet my wife has been unjustly accused of this.
9. A tape-recorded interview was conducted with my wife by the new care home manager. In this interview, the care home manager claimed to my wife that the report of the incident stated that “we” (meaning my wife and the young man) placed a towel over the resident’s hands. This was not true. In fact the report clearly states that “I” (the young man) placed a towel over the resident’s hands. By either mistakenly or deliberately misrepresenting the contents of the report, the new manager led my wife (who is not a fluent English speaker) into admitting to mistakes she had not actually made due to her shock and confusion at the interview and her failure (because of not being a fluent English speaker) to understand exactly what was being said and what she was being led into agreeing to.
10. The false accusation that my wife placed a towel over the hands of the resident and the tape-recorded supposed ‘confession’ will now form part of the disciplinary hearing against my wife even though it is stunningly clear from the incident report that it was the young man and the young man alone who placed the restraining towel over the resident’s hands to prevent her harming either the carers or herself.
11. With ever more people getting dementia and needing care, this incident indicates a dilemma that faces carers who are often from abroad and on minimum pay. If a resident becomes agitated and strikes out as many severe dementia sufferers do, official guidance is that no restraint should ever be used. However, if carers can see an elderly dementia sufferer is uncomfortable from lying in his or her own excrement, their natural instinct is to want to change the person’s pad and clothes to make them comfortable. This is especially true if (as was the case with my wife) the carers are already half-way through changing the resident.
12. I expect that this week or next week my wife will be fired from her ‘sh*t’ job because (I believe) the new manager wants to demonstrate her authority and that things that happened in the past will no longer be tolerated. I, on the other hand, feel that my wife and the other carer made the right decision to carry on changing the resident out of her excrement-smeared clothing and pad even if they had to use just a little mild restraint – a towel placed over the resident’s hands.
I wonder what you would want if you had an elderly family member with severe dementia – them to be left lying in their own excrement or for the mildest form of restraint to be used to make them clean and comfortable?
David Craig, on January 8th, 2019
