You’ll all have seen the story about three girls/women drowning off Brighton Beach.
Britain’s beaches seem to have become a favourite place for our multi-cultural-enriching friends to find willing and unwilling ladies to give them sexual release. Here, from the BBC (so I don’t get accused of being a far-right, racist, bigoted, fascist, Hitler-loving extremist) is just a recent Brighton Beach ‘incident:
The Brighton Beach Rape
“Three men have been found guilty of raping a woman on Brighton beach in a “cynical, predatory and callous attack”.
“Iranian national Abdulla Ahmadi, 26, and Egyptian national Ibrahim Alshafe, 25, had denied repeatedly raping the woman in the early hours of 4 October. Karin Al-Danasurt, 20 and also from Egypt, had denied filming her ordeal. He was also found guilty of rape as a secondary party. The three men – who are asylum seekers – were convicted at Hove Crown Court on Thursday. Jurors heard during the trial the victim was left “too scared to go out” following the rape.”
“The men were living at a Home Office hotel near Horsham at the time of the offence. Prosecutors have claimed that Al-Danasurt was convicted of murder in Egypt before he crossed the Channel into the UK on a small boat, although his defence barrister has disputed this. He had also been given a caution in the UK for criminal damage in April last year, prosecutors said. The court heard they targeted the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, after she became separated from her friends on a night out.”
“She was “highly intoxicated” to the extent that she was on her hands and knees vomiting into a toilet and could not stand unaided. The woman said to police the men laughed as they kicked her and grabbed her throat during the rape – leaving her with bruises. Al-Danasurt was accused of spitting in the woman’s face while recording the attack.”
The Brighton Beach drownings
What we know so far is:
Police have said they are exploring a “number of hypotheses” after three women’s bodies were found in the sea at Brighton beach. Local reports suggested the women, aged between 18 and their early 20s, were fully clothed when they were discovered shortly after sunrise on Wednesday. Emergency services attended after being alerted to someone in the water near Madeira Drive at around 5.45am, when the sea temperature was 12C. On Thursday, Sussex Police said its officers believed they had identified all three women and had informed their next of kin pending formal identification.
Chief Superintendent Adam Hays said the investigation “includes a number of hypotheses” and emphasised that it was “not appropriate to speculate” while evidence was still being gathered.
Some people might find the warning that it was “not appropriate to speculate” about the cause of the drownings slightly troubling. Some might even suspect that the police have evidence or even suspicions that some of our recently-arrived multi-culturally-enriching friends may be involved in the incident. We’re frequently told not to speculate when this is the case.
I am not for a moment suggesting that any wrongdoing was the cause of the drownings. Nor am I suggesting that any enrichers were involved. Moreover, we have been ‘reliably’ informed by the plods that the three women were “fully clothed“. I think we can all guess why the police have emphasised this fact.
But the whole event could be seen to throw up a rather thorny question: If the three girls/women had been gang raped and then drowned by our multi-culturally enriching friends, this would be a complete disaster for the ruling political, academic, bureaucratic. police and media elites who keep telling us that “diversity is our strength” and that only narrow-minded bigots, racists, Nazis, fascists etc etc oppose open-borders Third-world invasion of our country. There would be uncontrollable public fury and probably riots much worse than those which broke out after the adorable Welsh choir-boy’s slaughter of innocents in Southport. The public rage would be such that our useless, UK-hating, race-replacement-pushing politicians, bureaucrats, Border Farce and police would be finally forced kicking and screaming against public pressure to stop the boats.
So, let me be clear (as the useless Starmer repeatedly says) I am not suggesting for a moment that the three drowned girls/women were gang-raped and drowned. In fact, the evidence so far indicates that this is absolutely not the case. All I’m trying to do here is wonder aloud:
‘had the three women been gang-raped and drowned by some recently-arrived enrichers, would the plods and our ruling elites ever tell us the truth?’
I think we can guess the answer to that question.
Keir is listening:
To cheer us up in these grim times, here’s another (IMHO) brilliant satirical YouTube video
Nothing could beat the entertainment we’re all getting from Labour’s current Muppet puppet show. So here’s a (IMHO) brilliant YouTube video which seems to sum it all up:
I really don’t understand the shenanigans going on in Labour. It’s clear that most MPs want the useless widely-despised Starmer gone. But they don’t want Wes ‘son of Mandelson’ Streeting either.
Wes ‘son of Mandelson’ Streeting must be as tone deaf as the man he wants to replace if he thinks the whole nation will joyously bring out the bunting were he to become prime minister.
Labour is going left. Far left. The son of Mandelson is the Blairite past and is thus loathed by most Labour MPs.
My totally pointless and uninformed prediction – the son of Mandelson will lose, Starmer will hang on for about a year and then be replaced by Burnham, Rayner or, horror of horrors, Miliband.
Whichever of these UK-hating, economy-destroying, illegal-migrant-hugging, open-borders-adoring, Net-Zero-loving lunatics replaces the useless Starmer, Britain is fecked.
Much blethering and waffle has been imposed upon us by self-appointed ‘experts’ about how the ‘King of the North’, Andrew ‘f*ck-the-bond-market’ Burnham needs to become an MP to become Labour’s next disastrous, economy-destroying, UK-hating, illegal-migrant-hugging prime minister. But is this true?
From my extensive research (about 1 minute on Google), I have a feeling that it is actually theoretically possible for someone who is not an MP to become PM.
The Institute for Government (I’ve no idea who they are) tells us:
“The Conservative Party constitution says that the leader of the party “shall be drawn from those elected to Parliament”. Clause VII of the Labour Rule Book also says its leader “shall be elected from among Commons members of the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party].” .
But these are just rules and rules can be changed. If the Ginger Growler and her socialist chums want the wonderful KIng of the North to replace the catastrophically-incompetent and widely-loathed Davos man Starmer, they just need to change the rules.
Moreover the Institute for Government goes on to inform us:
“The process of appointing the prime minister assumes that he or she will sit in the Commons, but there is nothing that says what happens if they cease to be an MP. The prime minister is the King’s minister. Precedent suggests that a prime minister should be an MP, but there is no suggestion that they must immediately resign if they lost their seat”.
The Cabinet Manual (whatever that is) states that the prime minister “always sits in the House of Commons.” However, this mostly relates to the question of whether they should sit in the Commons rather than the House the Lords. So, from the embarrassingly little I understand, I get the feeling that it might be possible for Labour to shoe in the King of the North as our next prime minister by shoving him into the Lords.
Of course, both methods for annointing the King of the North as our next prime minister would most likely be met with outrage by much of the electorate. I only include them here because I’m surprised that none of the mainstream media ‘experts’ have thought it worth mentioning them.
I’m afraid I didn’t watch more than 5 seconds of our great leader’s supposed ‘reset’ speech yesterday. I just can’t stand the man because I know he’s just a vacuous, lying, self-serving PoS. I did see three of the questions put to him by our mainstream media before I switched that off too.
But I got the impression that all we were watching was a kind of ‘danse macabre’ in which Starmer and the media played a well-practised game where Starmer pretended to answer the concerns of voters and the media pretended to hold him to account. But neither Starmer nor the media actually mentioned the issues people were concerned about.
According to the Office for National Statistics, these are the main concerns of the public:
the cost of living (88%)
the NHS (86%)
the economy (71%)
immigration (60%)
crime (58%)
housing (55%)
From what I understand Starmer waffled on about delivering the changes people elected Labour to deliver. And Starmer’s main solution to these concerns was “putting Britain back at the heart of Europe”. Starmer made no mention of:
Cost of Living (88%) – Sir Keir the Noble made no mention of scrapping Mad Ed Miliband’s crazed Net Zero crusade which is the main reason the cost of living is so high as Miliband is asphyxiating businesses and households with the highest energy prices in the developed world. And no ‘journalist’ questioning Starmer made any mention of Miliband’s economically-suicidal Net Zero
NHS (86%) – Sir Keir the Great didn’t tell us what he was going to practically do to change the dismal performance of our collapsing NHS which was partly to do with the fact that almost a million people – mainly Third-worlders, many with greater medical needs than the average Brit – have arrived into Britain each year for at least the last ten years. And no ‘journalist’ questioning Starmer made any mention of the catastrophic pressure put on the NHS by about 10 million Third-worlders invading Britain over the last decade
The Economy (71%) – Sir Keir the Wise avoided explaining how it was his new taxes on jobs (NI increases), minimum wage increases, workers’ rights legislation and crushingly-high energy prices which were destroying businesses, increasing unemployment and pushing Britain into recession. And no ‘journalist’ questioning Starmer made any mention Labour’s growth-asphyxiating policies
Immigration (60%) – Davos man Starmer seems to have forgotten his promises to “smash the evil people-smuggling gangs” and “stop the boats“. And no ‘journalist’ questioning Starmer asked when Labour would be stopping the boats and smashing the evil people-smuggling gangs
Crime (58%) – I’m not sure Starmer made any mention of how Labour was going to reduce crime. In fact, under Labour criminals have been let out of jail early, jail has been scrapped for any offences meriting less than one year and shoplifting has been effectively decriminalised. And no ‘journalist’ questioning Starmer made any mention of Britain’s rapidly rising levels of crime and the Labour Government’s failure to do anything about this
Housing (55%) – I’m not sure Starmer gave any time to discussing why Labour was failing to deliver its promise to build 300,000 new homes a year – one and half million over the course of this parliament – and what he was going to do to correct this failure. And no ‘journalist’ questioning Starmer made any mention of Labour’s failure to deliver the housing it promised. And, of course, no ‘journalist’ asked how much of the new housing would go to British citizens and how much to migrants (legal and illegal)
There seems to me to be a tacit agreement between our politicians and mainstream media to avoid discussion of any of the thorny issues which actually concern British voters. Instead we get this absurd, almost ritualist ‘danse macabre’ where politicians pretend to deliver what the public wants while actually completely ignoring voters’ concerns and mainstream media ‘journalists’ pretend to hold politicians to account while actually avoiding asking ‘difficult’ or ‘uncomfortable’ questions.
A most curious situation has emerged in the South Coast holiday town of Bournemouth. If I remember the details correctly, a 40-year-old woman was raped on Bournemouth beach a couple of days ago.
Bournemouth’s ultra-effective police have made the usual appeals for help from the public. But, Bournemouth’s much-admired police have refused to issue any details about the suspect.
This seems odd to me. I have never raped anyone. Nor, fortunately, have I ever been raped. But from the little I understand about the act of rape, the person raped – the rapee – would have been in fairly close contact with the rapist. Therefore the rapee would surely have some knowledge of the rapist’s height, weight, hair colour, any facial hair and, of course, skin colour and thus possible ethnicity. Yet the world-famous Bournemouth police – whose duty it is to protect the law-abiding community – have asked for the public’s help to catch the rapist, but have refused to give any details about the rapist which might help the public identify the perpetrator.
I obviously don’t follow every story about rapes. But I do vaguely recall some concern expressed by the good citizens of Bournemouth when over 600 illegal migrants were put into hotels near Bournemouth beach where there been several rapes recently.
Now, of course, there may be no connection at all between the apparent increase in rapes in Bournemouth, the number of illegal migrants from Third-world, women-hating, excrement-covered hell-holes of corruption and misery and the apparent reluctance of Bournemouth’s universally-respected plods to give any details about the skin colour and ethnicity of the rapist. But being a nasty, cynical person, I would be far from surprised were we to eventually learn that the rapist happens to be a recent arrival from somewhere like Afghanistan, Syria or Iraq.
By the way, the BBC has provided a tool by which you can find out how many ‘rapists’ – sorry, of course I meant how many ‘illegal migrants’ – sorry again, what I really meant was, of course, Starmer’s ‘adorable’ and future Labour-voting multi-cultural enrichers’ – are being put up in hotels and other accommodation near where you live.
Some people have been bleating about how Rachel Reeves’s brilliant tax rises are hastening the demise of British pubs. We’re told that around two pubs a day are closing. This seems to be an accelerating trend as ‘only’ 336 British pubs closed their doors forever in 2025. There are currently still around 46,000 operating pubs in Britain.
Our glorious Labour government doesn’t really like pubs. After all, they could be places where disgruntled mainly White British people meet and rage against our useless, oppressive, free-speech-crushing, treacherous, anti-British government. Moreover, for obvious reasons, our government’s favourite demographic – the demographic which is taking over our country – is unlikely to frequent their local boozer.
But I have an idea. As Britain increasingly turns into the Islamic Caliphate of Britanistan, we’re not going to need too many pubs any more. But what we definitely will need are more mosques.
Iran has a population of around 90 million and an estimated 50,000 mosques. The population of Britain is officially about 69.9 million. But I think we all know it’s actually much higher than that. Moreover, with the ‘welcome the Third World’ open borders policies of the current Labour government and of the ‘keep Farage out‘ Labour/LibDem/Green/Gaza alliance which is likely to be our next government, the UK’s population will soon be heading up towards the 90 million too.
But we only have around 2,100 mosques. That won’t be sufficient for when Britain becomes an Islamic Caliphate. But there is an obvious solution – turn thousands of Britain’s increasingly bankrupt pubs into mosques. This will make good use of the buildings. And conveniently, if most of Britain’s rapidly closing pubs are turned into mosques, we’d soon have about the same number of mosques as in Iran. What’s not to like about that?
Of course, there are some horrible cynical, nasty, politically-incorrect people, such as those who made the video below, who are critical of the Islamification of our country. But we open-minded, progressive, liberal, illegal-migrant-hugging people know we should just ignore these bigoted, narrow-minded, hopeless-loser doom-mongers.
By the way, if you watch the video below on YouTube you’ll see some classic viewers’ comments.
Being an extremely boring person with no friends, no love and no social life, I was looking at some figures yesterday. That’s the kind of thing I do to fill my empty days.
I looked at the growth/reduction in CO2 emissions for several countries for the period 2014 to 2024 and compared these to growth/reduction in GDP per Capita for these countries.
CO2 is, of course – depending on your viewpoint:
a wonderful gas which is the basis for all life on Earth and increases in atmospheric CO2 levels are leading to a greening of the Earth
an evil poison which will destroy mankind due to CO2’s role in supposedly causing ‘Global Boiling’.
Here are the 5 countries with the greatest increase in CO2 emissions for the period 2014 to 2024:
Vietnam – CO2 emissions up 106% – GDP per Capita growth over 65%
Indonesia – CO2 emissions up 63% – GDP per Capita growth over 40%
India – CO2 emissions up 49%% – GDP per Capita growth over 72%
Turkey – CO2 emissions up 40% – GDP per Capita growth over 24%
China – CO2 emissions up 23% – GDP per Capita growth over 75%
And here are the five countries with the greatest reductions in CO2 emissions:
1. Britain – CO2 emissions down 29% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about 4%
2. Germany – CO2 emissions down 28% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about 11%
3. Japan – CO2 emissions down 24% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about minus 12%
4. Italy – CO2 emissions down 14% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about 9%
5. Brazil – CO2 emissions down 13% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about minus 16%
(Please note that the GDP per Capita growth/decline rates for the above five countries are not ‘per year’, they are the total for the ten year period)
Obviously each of these countries will have specific political and economic reasons for the level of GDP per Capita growth or decline over the 10 years from 2014 to 2024. But there nevertheless seems to be a correlation that most people will find blindingly obvious – the countries with the highest increases in CO2 emissions generally have the highest growth rates while the countries with the greatest reductions in CO2 emissions have the worst growth/decline rates.
We all could have guessed this. But please nobody tell ‘Mad’ Ed Miliband otherwise he will double down on cutting Britain’s CO2 emissions in order to impoverish us all even faster than he is so successfully doing at the moment.
Most of our media and talking heads all agree that President Trump is ‘mad’, ‘deluded’, ‘unpredictable’, psychologically unbalanced’, unfit to be president’ etc etc etc
But they deliberately overlook his successes:
He virtually stopped illegal immigration over the US’s southern border and has deported tens of thousands of illegals, many of them dangerous criminals. Perhaps our Trump-criticising rulers might tell us why they have failed to do this in Europe and the UK?
The US economy grew by 2.1% in 2025 compared to the EU’s 1.5% and the UK’s 1.4%. Under the rule of Mr Merz, the German Chancellor, who has been outspoken in his criticism of Trump, the German economy grew by about 0.2% in 2025. Perhaps our Trump-hating rulers could explain why Trump’s America has a better growth rate than their countries? It would also be interesting to hear from Mr Merz as to why Trump’s America’s growth rate in 2025 was over 10 times that of Herr Merz’s Germany? How about it, Herr Merz?
Trump has criticised NATO countries for hiding behind American military might, backed the other NATO countries into a corner over their failure to spend enough on their defence and several are now rapidly increasing their defence spending.
Trump has exposed the ‘Global Boiling’ scam for the nonsense it always was and has scrapped all the grifter subsidies which were pushing up US energy prices. Meanwhile the EU and Britain continue to pursue the ruinous, economically-suicidal ‘green’ policies which are destroying their industries, pushing up unemployment and turning their countries into post-industrial wastelands. Perhaps our Trump-hating loser politicians could explain why energy costs in the EU are around three times those in the US and energy costs in the UK are around four times those in the US? I’m sure a lot of people would be interested to hear an explanation? How about it Mr Starmer and Mr Miliband?
But it may be in foreign policy where Trump has been most successful. Taking out Venezuela’s Maduro and his wife was a move of genius. It has brought Venezuela under effective US control at minimum cost to the US and the US now decides where Venezuelan oil can go and how the country’s oil wealth can be spent. But the Maduro extraction and imprisonment also brought another benefit to the US – it has destroyed the Cuban economy and Cuba may soon be begging the US for help. I suspect the US will be only too willing to help Cuba providing the US gets significant control of the Cuban economy and political system. Trump got two birds with one stone.
Now everybody is blaming Trump for blundering into a war with Iran. But nobody seems interested in discussing what would have happened if America and Israel had not attacked. It’s clear now, from the vast number of ballistic missiles, drones and amount of enriched uranium that Iran had that Iran was intent on destroying Israel and bringing the whole Middle East under a nuclear- and missile-armed Iranian control. This had to be stopped.
Of course, defeating the suicidal, fanatical IRGC won’t be easy. The world found out how difficult beating death-obsessed, reality-denying fanatics can be when confronting Japan in WWII. And we all know the quote from some Prussian general “No plan survives first contact with the enemy” or, as MIke Tyson so eloquently said, “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face”. So there will be some setbacks to come in the confrontation with the murderous lunatics controlling Iran.
But one side of the Iranian conflict many observers might be missing is its effect on the US’s greatest economic and military rival – China. We can’t trust any economic data published by the beloved Chinese Communist Party (CCP). But various sources suggest that unemployment is soaring in China with factories closing, real estate companies collapsing and tens of millions facing ruin. Somewhere between 6 and 10 million Chinese will spend the next 20 years paying off the debt they took on to buy properties which will never be completed. Youth employment is officially around 17% but is probably well over 25% as, due to the difficulty of finding jobs, some young people are paying for services to pretend they are working, with such companies appearing in major cities.
The CCP claims that China’s GDP grew by 5.0% in 2025, meeting the government’s, and in some cases exceeding, growth targets. Yet this was despite factory closures, a property sector downturn and weak consumer spending. I’m sure the CCP will claim GDP growth of 5%-6% for 2026. But by the end of 2025, China was importing up to about 1.4 million barrels per day (mbd) from Iran, representing 13% of its total crude imports and some 80% to 90% of Tehran’s oil exports. Moreover, prior to Maduro’s holiday in the US, China was the primary buyer of Venezuelan oil, with estimates suggesting at least 5% of China’s crude oil imports came from Venezuela – over 90% of Venezuela’s exports went to China.
Incidentally, Vietnam’s GDP growth in 2025 was over 8%, mainly due to companies moving manufacturing from China to Vietnam.
So, by grabbing hold of Venezuela and by pummelling Iran, Trump may be killing two birds with one stone – thrashing Venezuela and Iran while at the same time severely damaging America’s enemies – Cuba and China?
‘Sir’ Keir Starmer lets tens of thousands of illegal male migrants of military age often from countries which teach that all Jews should be killed to invade our country and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when there is a rise in anti-semitic attacks.
‘Sir’ Keir promises to “smash the gangs” and “stop the boats” but does sweet FA. In fact, he ensures that Britain remains the most attractive destination in the world for illegals. Then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised that people start to believe he is an impotent, putrid, lying PoS.
‘Sir’ Keir Starmer brings in new laws targetting landlords imposing new rules and regulations and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when many landlords sell up, the number of rental properties fall, demand is much greater than supply and rental prices rise making it more difficult for people to find somewhere affordable to rent. Once again ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised.
‘Sir’ Keir Starmer deliberately distances Britain from our greatest ally, the US, in order to drag Britain back into the EU, which consistently exploits our country, and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when the US questions whether Britain can be a trusted ally.
‘Sir’ Keir gives away strategically-important British territory, the Chagos Islands, and about £35 billion of British taxpayers’ money to a small corrupt country, Mauritius, largely run by the Chinese Communist Party and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people start to view him as a UK-hating, treacherous scumbag.
‘Sir’ Keir volunteers his time and professional knowledge to help his human rights lawyer chums pursue lucrative legal cases against British soldiers for events which happened decades ago, when many of the British soldiers were just young squaddies aged 19 or 20, and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when our military feels they have lost the backing of the political class and the military have difficulty in recruiting. Yes, ‘Sir’ Keir is once again surprised.
‘Sir’ Keir’s hopeless Chancellor imposes huge tax increases on any business with employees and then ‘Sir’ Keir and his waste-of-skin Chancellor are surprised when businesses stop hiring, unemployment rises and the economy goes into recession. Yet again ‘Sir’ Keir is really surprised.
‘Sir’ Keir’s foul-mouthed, pig-ignorant gobshite former deputy prime minister crushes businesses with new restrictive labour laws and then ‘Sir’ Keir and the (tax avoiding?) gobshite are surprised when many companies are afraid to risk taking on new employees. Another surprise for ‘Sir’ Keir and his gang.
‘Sir’ Keir is both surprised and very very angry indeed when he finds out what everybody else has known for years – that his choice for UK ambassador to the US is a bit of a recidivist wrong ‘un. This time ‘Sir’ Keir is both surprised and extremely extremely angry that nobody told him what everybody already knew.
‘Sir’ Keir lets crazed eco-lunatic Mad Ed MIliband impose the highest energy prices in the developed world on British households and businesses due to Miliband Junior’s monomaniacal ‘renewable energy’ fantasies and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when British oil refineries, steel works, chemical factories, glassworks and other industries close their UK operations throwing thousands of skilled workers out of a job. It’s all a bit of a surprise to ‘Sir’ Keir and madman Miliband.
‘Sir’ Keir also lets the (IMHO) mentally deranged, life-long parasite Miliband Junior block any new drilling for oil or gas in the North Sea and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when Britain’s former thriving oil capital Aberdeen becomes an impoverished ghost town and Britain has to expensively import oil and gas from other countries. ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised as he never expected this might result from preventing Britain from using its own energy resources.
‘Sir’ Keir and his inept Chancellor keep borrowing and borrowing and borrowing money Britain can never pay back and then nasal robotic ‘Sir’ Keir and his equally nasal and robotic Chancellor are surprised when about 90% of the money we are now borrowing is needed just to pay the interest on the money we have already borrowed. That surprises ‘Sir’ Keir and his (IMHO) ponderous intellectually-challenged, serially-incompetent sidekick.
‘ Sir’ Keir gives massive handouts to those who contribute absolutely nothing to our country – the ever-expanding public sector and the ever-increasing armies of those who can’t be arsed to work – while asphyxiating the productive parts of our economy with constantly-increasing taxes and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when businesses view Britain as hostile to private enterprise and decide to invest their money elsewhere. Just another surprise for ‘Sir’ Keir.
‘Sir’ Keir (and also allegedly Lady Victoria Sponger) take thousands of pounds of free stuff from Lord Alibaba and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people start to think he was lying when he promised a government of openness and integrity. Surprise after surprise for ‘Sir’ Keir.
‘Sir’ Keir sets up a two-tier ‘justice’ system in which White British are brutally punished for the slightest wrong-thought or wrong-speech while the invading masses are let off lightly however heinous their crimes and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people refer to him as “two-tier Keir”.
‘Sir’ Keir does almost everything in his power to block a public inquiry into the rape gangs brutalising tens of thousands of White British, often underage girls in order to keep the Muslim vote for Labour and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people think he is a brazen liar whenever he blethers on about protecting British women and girls.
There are many many other things which seem to surprise probably the most useless, loathed, incompetent, anti-British Prime Minister in our history. Life must be exciting for ‘Sir’ Keir as each day seems to bring a new surprise.
David Craig, on May 16th, 2026
