Apparently our sub-Churchillian prime minister gave a speech at the ‘Big Iftar; in Westminster Hall to a mostly Muslim audience. In his speech he grovellingly bleated that Britain had no role in the attacks on Iran. He also told the audience that they were “the face of modern Britain”.
I’m not sure what he meant by “the face of modern Britain”. Surely it can’t be what horrible, waaccissst, Islamophobic people suggest – misogyny, oppression of women, encouragement of first-cousin marriages, rejection of ideas of equality, freedom and democracy, loathing of the British people and the British way of life?
I wish Mr Starmer could have explained what he meant.
Anyway, thankfully the brilliant satirists on the Internet have quickly leapt on Starmer’s latest blundering with a wonderful adaptation of Billy Joel’s ‘The Piano Man‘:
Much and mush have been written and said by experts and self-proclaimed ‘experts’ about the results of the Gorton and Denton by-election. But I’d still like to make three brief points:
it wasn’t a disaster for Starmer
the next government will be red (Labour), yellow (LibDems) and green-green (Greens and Muslims)
demographic changes mean Britain will never have a pro-British government again
It wasn’t a disaster for Starmer
All the experts have claimed the result was a disaster for Starmer. I disagree. The incumbent government will usually take a beating at by-elections. And yet in spite of the Labour candidate being a complete unknown and in spite of Starmer being the most loathed prime minister in British history, Starmer’s Labour still got 25.4% of the vote:
I’m amazed anyone voted Labour given what a catastrophe Starmer’s UK-hating, migrant-adoring, economy- and jobs-destroying government has been. So for me, 25.4% of the vote for Labour doesn’t seem too disastrous
The next government will be a red, yellow, green-green ‘stop Farage’ coalition
Looking at the overall results, you can see that the pro-British vote only reached 30.6% (Reform and Conservatives). But the anti-British, open-borders, economically-suicidal Net-Zero obsessed, tax-the-rich, expand the useless public sector vote (Green, Labour and LibDem) got 67.9%.
I realise that this constituency was a strong Labour one. Therefore this vote is not representative of the whole country. But the vast size of the anti-British vote (67.9%) suggests that a pro-British party like Reform will never be able to get the numbers to beat the anti-British coalition of red-yellow-green-green.
At the next election, the red-yellow-green-green block will run a brutal ‘stop Farage’ campaign which is likely to galvanise our ever-growing anti-British section of the population into voting to stop Reform getting anywhere near government.
Demographic changes mean Britain will never have a pro-British government again
But perhaps one of the most interesting charts to come from this by-election was a poll of voting intentions of British and immigrant communities:
With net immigration running at over 500,000 a year and with the fertility rates of ethnic minorities much higher than those of White British, the White British will decline as a percentage of the population in their own country. There are even projections that White British could be a minority in their own country by the 2050s. This means that the chances of ever having a pro-British government decline every year.
At the next General Election, when the red-yellow-green-green coalition manages to outperform Reform and block Reform from governmnet, will be when UK patriots realise they are outvoted in their own country. Moreover, they will finally start to understand that the coalition of lefty UK-haters and anti-British migrant voters will forever prevent a real pro-British government. And people do not like to be shown that they have lost their own country. Civil war beckons.
Lebanon was once a Christian country and one of the most advanced in the MIddle East. It is now an Islamic cesspit and a basket-case, bankrupt, violent, intolerant, failed state with almost no Christians left alive. Maybe with unlimited Third-world immigration of people who hate us and reject our values and way of life and the ludicrous economy-destroying Net Zero policies imposed on us by our own UK-loathing lefties, Brtain will become Europe’s Lebanon?
Today I was going to write a really depressing piece about Britain’s (lack of a) future. But there’s been so much good news, that I thought it worth taking a break from the doom and gloom.
Crapistan vs Talibanistan
It seems that Crapistan and Talibanistan have decided to beat the living daylights out of each other. Let us hope that both sides are enormously successful and a huge improvement is made to the human gene pool as a result.
Iranistan
The biggest chance of the human gene pool improving, of course, comes from Iranistan. The Americans and Israelis have gone in to try to defang possibly the most dangerous and murderous regime in the world.
But, ok, you know all about that. No need for me to repeat what so many others are reporting sometimes with much greater and sometimes with much less knowledge than myself. So, let’s get on to the point of this blog. There are just two issues I thought worth mentioning:
the horror and fury of Britain’s lefties at the attack on their favourite mad mullahs
Trump’s strategic genius
Lefties losing it
I probably read fewer than one Guardian article a year. However, I did read this one. The Guardian is incensed by the attack on Iranistan:
The arrticle is, I believe, interesting for a couple of reasons:
it shows us how the lefties, the whole BBC and the whole Labour/LibDem West-hating, UK-loathing establishment thinks. The article is full of vituperation against Tump. He is accused of starting an illegal war to draw attention away from the Epstein files and several other ludicrous reasons. The article never mentions the danger Iranistan has posed to the world for the last 47 years of the illegal Islamist occupation. And the article never considers that Trump might have understood that that the Iranistan Islamist serpent had to be crushed as a basis for possible peace in the Middle East
the article uses the fiction of ‘International Law’ to lambast the US/Israeli attack. But what would ‘International Law’ say about the murderous Islamist regime bringing in around 5,000 foreign fighters to slaughter possibly tens of thousands of innocent Iranians both in the streets and later when found wounded in hospitals? Why doesn’t Guardian mention that?
I wonder if they’ll be wearing black armbands at the Guardian offices and at the BBC in mourning at the demise of their favourite murderous muslim – Ayatollah Khameini? Truly, the US/Israeli attack was a dark day for Britain’s lefties.
Trump’s strategic genius
Trump has completely revolutionised international politics. Being a businessman, when he sees a problem, he looks for the most effective solution:
We saw this in Venezuela. Rather than organising an invasion, he just took out the top guy and told the successor that unless she did exactly what America said, she would be next to be imprisoned for the rest of her life or even wiped out. As they say, ‘when you’ve got them by the balls, their hearts and minds usually follow’. Though, of course, I realise Venezuela’s new leader is a woman and so possibly doesn’t have any testicles. Though nowadays you never know
With Iran Trump has avoided a Bush/Blair-style Iraq invasion. He has made it clear he will not be putting American boots on the ground. Instead he explained that he will crush the Islamic regime’s air force, army and navy, wipe out its nuclear and ballistic missile facilities and obliterate its leaders and command structures. That’s it. As for the Iranian people, Trump has said that this is their chance to overthrow the Islamist mass murderers and get their country back. Whether the Iranians do that or not is their problem. It’s a pity Bush and Blair didn’t think of trying this approach against Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.
Because most of the mainstream media suffers from acute TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome), they never seem capable of giving him credit for his achievements. But Trump has stopped illegal immigration into the US, deported thousands of illegals, presided over 4.4% (I think) economic growth, pressured hundreds of companies to bring manufacturing back into the US, ditched the ludicrous economically-suicidal climate nonsense, withdrawn from the self-serving grifters on the IPCC and done so much more. He is probably one of the greatest presidents America has ever had. Yet all we get, day after day from the mainstream media, are negative stories, criticism and insults.
I’m on the way out. But before I go I just wanted to make a plea to our unbiased national broadcaster – the BBC.
Dear BBC, please get Jeremy Bowen into Iran to report on what is really happening. Then he can spout IRGC propaganda about how the evil Israelis and Yankees are just bombing hospitals and schools killing millions, or maybe even trillions, of innocent people and children.
We need to hear from Jeremy Bowen. We deserve to hear the “truth”.
This doesn’t seem to be going too well in spite of honest Mr Starmer’s many promises:
Deporting the illegals
This doesn’t seem to be going too well either:
The vast majority of Channel migrants are still avoiding deportation despite Labour’s repeated vows to boot them out. Some 2,550 were removed in the year to December, up from 2,324 in 2024 and 2,042 in 2023.
Oh, what a surprise – the Guardian and the BBC seem to have forgotten to mention this disaster.
So, around 95% of illegal migrants – many of whom are uneducated, unemployable, deeply misogynist, frequently criminal and most of whom hate the British, British values and the British way of life – are allowed to stay in Starmer’s UK. Why? Because most can be shoved into marginal constituencies where they will become Labour voters.
What could possibly go wrong? Maybe civil war within the next 20 years as the British fight back against becoming a minority in their own country?
Humour still survives on the Internet
In spite of Starmer’s Ofcom using its powers to ban humour and satire from TV and Ofcom’s attacks on Elon Musk’s ‘X’, thankfully they still survive somewhere on the Internet thanks to the creativity of ordinary Brits:
I’m getting really fed up with weirdos and creeps claiming Britain is becoming an Islamic country. Aren’t you? I bet you are!
For example, I’ve seen this diagram posted somewhere:
This seems to suggest a process by which a non-Islamic country can be turned into an Islamic one. Of course, this is complete nonsense. Nothing like this could ever happen in Britain. That’s obvious, isn’t it?
Horrible people – racists, bigots, Islamophobes, xenophobes, Little Englanders and other such idiots – use all kinds of misleading claims to convince us that Britain is coming under the control of our Muslim friends:
We have open borders and thus uncontrolled immigration, often from Muslim countries, and our rulers try every lie and trick they can think of to avoid taking any action
With current rates of legal and illegal immigration, White British could become a minority in their own country by the 2050s. The fastest growing group are our Islamic friends and neighbours
Pakistani Muslim rape gangs are allowed to rape, beat and torture tens of thousands of White British (often underage) girls with no action from the police or other authorities
Any inquiry into the rape gang phenomenon is repeatedly blocked and delayed by politicians, bureaucrats and police
British religious festivals – Christmas, Easter etc – are downplayed and even abandonned by schools, retailers and other organisations while Islamic festivals are promoted and shoved down our throats
Two-tier Keir’s ‘justice’ system crushes any signs of worry from White British about what is happening to their country while allowing mosque-based hate preachers free rein to spew out their bile and loathing of Britain, the British and the British way of life
Starmer’s government blocks our ally America from using US bases in the UK for any attack to liberate Iran from the mad, murderous ayatollahs in order to avoid upsetting British Muslims who are key parts of the Labour vote
The government has just announced around £45 million for protection of places of worship. Of this about £40 million will go to protecting mosques and just £5 million to protecting churches, synagogues and Hindu temples
There are possibly around 85 Sharia Courts in Britain running an alternative justice system whose judgements are often in conflict with British law. Our politicians and police look the other way and pretend this isn’t happening
Many areas of our cities have become no-go areas for non-Muslims
We now have the beginnings of an Islamic political party in Parliament with some independent MPs seemingly more interested in what is happening in Gaza than in their own constituencies
Ten men from our faviurite religion have just been convicted of setting a mother and daughter on fire in a ‘revenge attack’ following some trivial dispute
Of course, some or all the claims in the above list may be true. But in what-have-the-Romans-done-for-us style I sincerely believe that there is absolutely nothing in the above list which in any way suggests Britain is falling under Islamic control. Yet we have crazy conspiracy theorists – probably the kind of lunatics who don’t believe in man-made Global Boiling and who claim that the Covid vaccines weren’t ‘safe and effective’ – making videos like the one linked below.
I am shocked. I tell you, really shocked. I simply can’t understand how anyone could make a video like this:
Many families from our favourite religion are faced with a difficult choice. When a female member of the family is deemed to have brought shame or dishonour on their family, for example by becoming too ‘Westernised’, wearing immodest clothes or even consorting with anyone from outside their religion, the family needs to decide whether the female should merely receive a good beating, or else be raped multiple times to teach her a lesson or just be killed to save the family’s honour. From the little I understand, the beatings, rapes and murders are carried out by an assortment of brothers, uncles and cousins. So they’re a kind of jolly family affair, a bit like Christmas dinner for us non-Muslims.
It is believed that there is about one ‘honour’ murder in communities of our favorite religion in Britain each month – about 12 a year. Though these are the only ones which are reported. There are indications that the real figure may be much higher as the murders often occur when the girls/women are sent to ‘visit’ their families in countries like Pakistan and Bangladesh and don’t come back to Britain. But many females, who aren’t actually murdered to protect the family’s honour, can get other delightful punishments.
So you don’t think I am being waaacccisssst or Islamophobic or bigotted or intolerant or xenophobic or any such wrong-thought crime of that ilk, I will just quote from the woker than woke, Islamophiliac Guardian newspaper. After all, there’s nothing more tolerant in our mainstream media than our beloved BBC in-house rag – the Guardian newspaper.
In an April 2024 article: the Guardian newspaper informed us that:
The number of “honour-based” abuse offences recorded by English police forces has increased by more than 60% in two years, figures suggest, with concerns voiced that increased polarisation is partly to blame. Data from 26 out of 39 constabularies approached showed that there were 2,594 cases of “honour-based” abuse – which includes forced marriage, rape, death threats and assault – in 2022, compared with 1,599 in 2020.
We’re also told that:
The Metropolitan police, West Midlands and Greater Manchester forces recorded the highest rates of honour-based abuse in 2021 and 2022. Across the two years, the Met recorded 1,213 cases, including 514 cases of violence. There were two attempted murders, 32 rapes, 310 cases of forced marriage and 49 cases of female genital mutilation.
Greater Manchester police’s tally of 729 cases included 42 of rape, 65 assaults causing actual bodily harm, 56 forced marriage offences, 104 of assault and battery and 153 instances of controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. West Midlands recorded 729 cases including 115 of coercive behaviour in an intimate relationship, 27 of rape, 19 forced marriages and 90 threats to kill.
However, given the tendency of the communities, where ‘honour’ punishments happen, to circle the wagons and close ranks when they feel they are being criticised, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to suspect that the real figures of ‘honour’ beatings, rapes and murders may be much higher than the Guardian or our rulers like to admit.
Now, I’m afraid we need to turn to the Daily Telegraph – boo, hiss, fascists, bigots, Nazis.
The Telegraph gives us a hint as to how vigorously our rape-gang-loving police have pursued perpetrators of ‘honour’ crimes:
Last year, 2,949 honour-related offences were recorded in Britain, but only 95 defendants were prosecuted. In 2023/24, 2,755 offences were registered, but there were only 80 corresponding prosecutions. In 2022/23, there were 3,008 recorded incidents and just 68 successful prosecutions.
Overall, only around 3% of ‘honour’ crimes are prosecuted each year.
Lucy Connolly was banged up pretty quickly in order to intimidate the supposed ‘right-wing thugs’ who were enraged by the Islam-motivated Southport child murders by Britain’s most famous Welsh choirboy. I wonder what happened to the two Pakistani Muslim men who were filmed on security cameras attacking police at Manchester Airport including breaking the nose of one female police officer. Have they even been sentenced yet? Or, in two-tier Keir’s ludicrously biased ‘justice’ system, will there ever be any action taken against them? A cynic might even suspect that the only person who will be punished for the Manchester Airport fight will be ‘the messenger’ – the person who released the whole video to a Manchester newspaper exposing the authorities’ attempts to portray the Pakistani Muslim attackers as innocent victims.
So, it looks like the (IMHO) treacherous, UK-hating, WEF- and UN-adoring Starmer is going ahead with his Chagos Islands giveaway in spite of opposition by the US. We’re told that ‘international law’ forces us to give the islands and £35 billion to Mauritius. But that, like pretty much everything the (IMHO) lying liar Starmer says, is a lie. We’re also told that we’re giving the islands to Mauritius. In reality, we’re giving them to Starmer’s new chums in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as part of Starmer’s obsession with soiling our links with our erstwhile ally America in order to suck up to our enemy China.
However, I don’t wish to spend this blog carping and criticising. So, in spirit of trying to help our government make the best possible decisions in the WEF’s (sorry, I meant ‘Britain’s) interests, I investigated what other British territories Starmer could use the excuse of ‘international law’ to give away to countries who loathe us almost as much as Starmer seems to loathe us.
Here are the main overseas territories still controlled by Britain:
Wow, look at all the opportunities for our surrender-monkey PM Starmer to give away in order to damage Britain and grovel to our enemies.
For a start, in order to curry favour with the German-run European Union, Starmer could hand over Gibraltar to Spain. After all, surely Starmer and Hermer could find some ‘international law’ which says that the original treaty handing Gibraltar to Britain was illegal and that Gibraltar should belong to Spain? Perhaps Starmer and Hermer can even find an ‘international law’ which says we should throw in a few tens of billions of our money as ‘reparations’ to Spain for Britain owning Gibraltar for so many years?
Or there are the Falkland Islands. Reportedly there’s lots of oil and gas in that area as well as abundant fish stocks. We don’t need the Falklands’ oil and gas in Britain as we have mad Ed Miliband’s wonderful 12th century windmills and we don’t have a fishing industry anymore. It can’t be too difficult for Starmer and Hermer to find an ‘international law’ which demands the Malvinas be handed over to the Argies?, And there must be some ‘international law’ stating that the British defence of the Falklands after the Argie invasion was illegal. So we also should give the Argies billions of reparations for the sinking of the Belgrano and for all the Argy soldiers killed in Thatcher’s supposedly ‘illegal’ Falklands war?
And then there are our military bases in Cyprus. Under ‘international law’ do we actually have a right to control these bases? Perhaps ‘international law’ dictates that China has just as much right to these bases as Britain? So we could give those directly to China? After all, in Starmer’s ‘international law’ world communist totalitarian China is our friend and democratic, freedom-loving America is our enemy.
Hey, and while we’re having our “Great British Giveaway” Starmer, what about expelling the Americans from their military bases in the UK and handing those over to China too? After all, you’ve just refused the US permission to use their UK military bases for any action against your ayatollah friends in Iran because that would go against your beloved ‘international law’ (and might upset your Muslim voters). So, if the Americans are forbidden by ‘international law’ from using the bases to defend the Free World, you might as well give the bases to the Chinese. You could also give the Chinese lots of our borrowed money to cover the expense of them moving their fighter jets and bombers and missiles and military personnel to Britain.
Dear Mr Starmer, honourable Knight of the Realm, I hope this short blog gives you a few good ideas on what other British territories you and your band of treacherous, UK-hating Labour scum could use the excuse of ‘international law’ to surrender to our enemies.
(Apologies if you’re a viewer of Simon Webb’s (IMHO) brilliant History Debunked YouTube channel where I first saw this story)
We’re constantly told that without immigration, our beloved NHS (which is the envy of the world) would collapse. But how true is this?
Pakistan’s somewhat dubious ‘pilots‘
Let’s start this blog in Pakistan.
On 22 May 2020, Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) Flight 8303, a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Lahore to Karachi, crashed while on approach to Jinnah International Airport, killing 97 out of the 99 people on board as well as an additional person on the ground. The aircraft, an Airbus A320-214 with 91 passengers and 8 crew members on board, was approaching the runway too fast and at too great a height. The aircraft subsequently belly landed nearly half-way down the airport runway because the captain and first officer ‘forgot’ to lower the landing gear. Ooops!
The flight crew then conducted a go-around. During the go-around, both engines started to fail due to damage sustained during the belly landing. Whilst attempting to land back on the runway, this time with the landing gear lowered, the aircraft lost airspeed and crashed into buildings. All 8 crew members and 89 out of the 91 passengers on board were killed by the impact and post-crash fire. One person who was inside the buildings died ten days after the crash due to burn injuries.
Subsequent investigations revealed that around 1 in 3 PIA pilots wasn’t actually qualified to fly passenger planes. They had got their licences due to corruption – mainly bribing examiners with generous dollops of cash.
Nigeria’s somewhat dubious ‘nurses’
Hundreds of frontline NHS staff are treating patients despite being under investigation for their part in an alleged “industrial-scale” qualifications fraud. More than 700 nurses are caught up in a potential scandal, which a former head of the Royal College of Nursing said could put NHS patients at risk.
The scam allegedly involves proxies impersonating nurses and taking a key test in Nigeria, which must be passed for them to become registered and allowed to work in the UK.
What about our beloved NHS?
So, given that so many doctors, nurses, radiologists and other healthcare workers come from some of the world’s most corrupt, cess-pit countries, where lying, cheating amd dishonesty are the national sport, how many medics trained abroad working in the NHS are actually qualified?
Of course, we don’t know the answer. But we can get a hint of whether there might be a more than minor problem with such people employed by the NHS. Here are the latest ten doctors referred to the Medical Practioners Tribunal Service:
Dr Mohamed EL MUIAD – February 2026
Dr Lina SIMAVICIUTE – February 2026
Dr Isa ALALWANI – February 2026
Dr Ramamoorthy RAGURAM – February 2026
Dr Piotr PIERZCHNIAK – February 2026
Dr Attiya SHEIKH – February 2026
Dr Victor EVBUOMWAN – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Joseph RUGEMINTWAZA – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Najmiah AHMAD – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Sonali MUKHERJEE-BOSE – February 2026
Not too many typical British names there?
But before we start to draw any possible conclusions, here are the next 10 doctors investigated for various alleged offences:
Dr Ian HUDSON – Jan-Feb 2026
Dr Atif ZAMAN – January 2026
Dr Mark ELIAS – January 2026
Dr Mohit CHHABRA – January 2026
Dr Ronald JAMES – January 2026
Dr Velmurugan KUPPUSWAMY – January 2026
Dr Saheb Peer SHABAZ KHALANDER – January 2026
Dr Alan CAMPBELL – January 2026
Dr Neill GARRARD – January 2026
Dr Sekela MWAMBINGU – January 2026
This time, about 5 of the 10 doctors investigated seem to have British-sounding names. But in the next 10 investigated, only one seems to have a British-sounding name. And in the following 10, just 2 had British-sounding names.
Like’s too short for me to investigate the background and education of all the doctors investigated by the Tribunal to see whether they got their medical qualifications in Britain or in one of the world’s more regulatory-challenged, ethically-challenged, morally-challenged countries. But a quick glance at the activities of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service could give some readers pause for thought next time a doctor or nurse from one of the world’s more ‘exotic’ countries is going to treat them:
Starmer, Reeves and company seem to be doing everything thay can to p*ss of the USA and ingratiate ourselves with the EU. Our future economic growth, Starmer and Reeves assure us, lies in closer relations with the EU and the US can go swing in the wind.
Being a really really boring person, I had a quick look at the basic numbers to check whether alienating America and grovelling to the EU really was the route to Britain’s economic salvation.
Here are a few, possibly relevant, figures:
The US economy is projected to hit around $31.82 trillion in 2026. The EU is projected to reach $22.52 trillion
The population of the USA is about 342 million and the EU population about 450 million
The GDP per capita of the US is around $86,000 compared to the EU’s GDP per capita of just $43,000. The UK’s gdp per capita is about $60,000
So there’s something bit odd here. The UK’s gdp per capita lies between the US’s impressive $86,000 and the EU’s rather less admirable $43,000. Yet Starmer and Reeves claim we’re better off distancing ourselves from the rich USA and getting closer to the much poorer EU. Hmmm?
Now we need to look at projected gdp growth rates:
The 2026 projected growth rate for the US economy is about 2.1%
The 2026 projected growth rate for the EU is 1.4%
The 2026 projected growth rate for the UK is 1.3%
So, if you weren’t Starmer or Reeves, which economy would you rather link into? The USA’s with a projected 2026 growth rate of 2.1% on an economy worth $31.82 trillion or the EU’s with a projected growth rate of just 1.4% on an economy worth just $22.52 trillion?
Tough question, huh?
But don’t worry. Having having had the figures analysed by hordes of spotty, just-out-of-universlty, barely pubescent spads, Starmer and Reeves have decided that the EU is our economic future.
I guess I could never have become a government adviser as I would have based my advice on facts rather than ideological fantasies.
David Craig, on March 5th, 2026
