Readers might be slightly bemused by this story which I don’t believe you’ll see reported by any of the UK mainstream media.
We all know the “miracle vaccines” are totally safe. At least that’s what our rulers, our leading scientists, the big pharma companies and all the mainstream media have repeatedly told us.
Nevertheless, the Australian Government has set up an official compensation scheme for the families of people killed by the totally safe miracle vaccines:
Just to prove that I’m not a crazed, science-denying, tin-foil-hat-wearing anti-vaxxer making this story up, here’s a link to the official Australian Government website explaining the scheme:
It’s a pity no journalist, either in Australia or the UK, noticed this when the Australians were angrily hounding tennis player, Novak Djokovic, out of Australia when he refused to get the totally safe (but sometimes deadly, especially to elite sportspeople) miracle vaccines.
Total madness?
My thanks to the first two readers who have written comments. What I failed to say in this very brief blog was to give a conclusion.
The vaccines are not (I believe) what we would traditionally have thought of as a ‘vaccine’. They merely reduce the risk of serious illness for the elderly and vulnerable. This was no doubt worthwhile in the first phases of the Chinese Wuhan lab-leaked plague and probably saved many lives. But to carry on vaccinating is questionable as the Chinese plague has become less dangerous. As for vaccinating our young people and children, whose risk of serious illness from Covid is minimal, with a chemical mixture whose effectiveness is just a few months and whose long-term effects are completely unknown, this is complete and irresponsible madness.
But our rulers – politicians, scientists and mainstream media – have painted themselves into a corner. Having virtually forced us to take their vaccines, they cannot now turn round and admit that mass vaccination is unnecessary. And so the vaccinations continue…….
Hopefully most readers know about the entertaining incident at the recent Oscars when one member of the African-American Philosophers Society – a Mr William Smith – thumped another member of the African-American Philosophers Society during a discussion about the purpose of human existence or whatever:
To show that this is a common modus operandi of the African-American Philosophers Society, rather than a one-off incident, I thought I might use today’s blog to give a few more examples of African-Americans having philosophical discussions about the meaning of life.
Prepare to be enlightened by these examples of these great modern-day thinkers from the African-American Philosophers Society:
I could comment on the intellectual level of the discussions of the African-American Philosophers Society. But I might risk writing something which could be deemed as politically-incorrect.
So, all I’ll say is – give us more diversity. Diversity is our strength. Diversity is really enriching the life experiences of us all!
As you probably know, Jamaica’s PM told Prince William last week that Jamaica is “moving on” and embracing its destiny as an independent country, later calling the Caribbean nation’s switch to a republican model “inevitable”.
Though it seem as if Jamaica would like to extract a pile of money in supposed “reparations” from Britain, before the country ditches the Queen. Speaking at a press briefing, Prime Minister Andrew Holness said William’s three-day visit to the island, which has sparked protests over Britain’s colonial-era role in the slave trade and calls for reparations, offered a chance to address “unresolved” issues.
Moving in?
What you might not know is that our Chinese friends are vying to become Jamaica’s new BFFL (best friend for life).
Since 2019, Beijing has extended more than $2.1 billion in loans to Kingston, making it the biggest recipient of Chinese cash in the Caribbean, and the sixth largest recipient in Latin America.
It is outdone by only the likes of Venezuela, Brazil, Ecuador, Argentina, and Bolivia. Jamaica’s own Foreign Affairs Ministry building has been built by China’s Jiangsu Jiangdu Construction Group.
At the opening of the new building in January, Beijing’s ambassador to Kingston, Tian Qi, stressed the importance of the year 2022 for Sino-Jamaican relations. It is, after all, the 50th anniversary of diplomatic ties between the nations.
Jamaica is following Barbados which became the world’s newest republic on 30 November 2021. It officially removed Queen Elizabeth II as the head of state, around 400 years after it became a British colony. An overnight ceremony was held in its capital, Bridgetown marking the birth of the new republic. This was after Barbados joined the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Belt and Road Initiative in 2019 pocketing around $500m of Chinese loans in the process.
Who’s next?
The CCP now owns much of Sri Lanka and Pakistan due to these two countries being unable to repay massive loans made to them by the CCP. The CCP also owns ports around the world usually bought up by making unrepayable loans to corrupt local politicians:
(left-click on image, then left-click again to see more clearly)
It now looks like the CCP will use its ‘debt colonialism’ to take over a series of Caribbean islands and maybe soon start building military bases within easy reach of the US mainland. Interesting times ahead?
While Russia resorts to brutal 20th Century military invasions to grab more territory, the CCP is calmly and inexorably buying up the world without firing a shot.
There’s a new word which I believe should soon enter both the English and American languages. It’s a verb – to “Pfizer”. A person can “Pfizer” and a person can also be “Pfizered”
The dictionary definition of “to Pfizer” could be: to inject someone, usually due to a vaccine mandate, with an untested chemical mixture using untested new technology, which is eye-wateringly profitable for Pfizer, but whose effectiveness is extremely doubtful, whose many side-effects have been concealed by Pfizer and the authorities and whose long-term effects on the human body are completely unknown.
If you have been “Pfizered”, you may well suffer from any number of 19 pages of possible side effects. The most serious of these may be inflammation of the heart muscles (myocarditis or pericarditis). For most people, this inflammation of the heart muscles will probably only last 2 to 3 months. But for some people, especially elite sportspeople who regularly put extreme levels of strain on their hearts, a Pfizering can lead to a heart attack and even death. So far, over 100 fit, young sportspeople – footballers, gymnasts, cricketers and others of their ilk – are believed to have been seriously “Pfizered”.
What evidence do we have of “Pfizering”?
As with the Wuhan lab-leak of the Covid virus, anyone daring to question the efficacy and/or safety of the Pfizer mRNA miracle vaccine, was initially branded a crank and conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxxer and right-wing fascist and so on and so forth by the scientific and political elites and their sycophants in the mainstream media as they herded us into their vaccination centres to be jabbed just like sheep or cows would be rounded up and injected with all kinds of cr*p.
Evidence 1 – The WHO warns about heart muscle inflammation
But now, even the utterly discredited, China-controlled, ludicrously-misnamed World Health Organisation (WHO) has admitted that mRNA vaccines can cause inflammation of the heart muscles. Here’s a quote from the WHO website I used a few months ago:
The COVID-19 subcommittee of the WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) issued a statement regarding reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccines (1). Cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, although rare, have occurred more often in younger men (adolescents or young adults) and after the second dose, typically within a few days after vaccination with the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. As of June 2021, US VAERS surveillance data estimated crude reporting rates of 40.6 cases per million second doses among males and 4.2 cases per million among females aged 12-29 years (2). Current evidence suggests a likely causal association between myocarditis and the mRNA vaccines.
Evidence 2 – Rise in excess mortality in younger age groups
And now we have an interesting study from Germany looking at the average ages of excess mortality in the year before vaccinations (2020) and the year of vaccinations (2021)
As you’ll see, in 2020 when Covid was getting going in Germany there was slightly raised excess mortality in the 60-79 age group as would be expected given that the Chinese plague affected the elderly most seriously. But once vaccinations (mainly Pfizer, I believe) started there was a pretty impressive rise in excess mortality in the 15-49 age group. And we know from the mortality rates of Covid by age group that it’s not the virus which is causing the excess mortality in the younger age groups:
Here are two more charts from Germany. The top chart shows excess mortality by month in 2021, while the lower chart shows the number of first, second and (third) booster vaccinations given:
It would be difficult not to see some correlation between the number of vaccinations and the number of excess deaths.
It’s the same the whole world over
In my blog of 27 November 2021, I gave some examples of elite athletes having mysterious heart problems, sometimes resulting in death.
In my blog of 11 March 2022, I gave a link to a video from Dr John Campbell in which he reveals his astonishment that Pfizer and the US Food and Drug Administration tried to withhold the safety data on the Pfizer for up to 75 years.
Regular readers will know that I’ve just returned from the Land of Smells/Smiles (LoS). While I was there, a rather famous sportsperson died from a heart attack. Was his early death at 52 partly due to him having been Pfizered? We’ll never know.
A couple of weeks later in the LoS this 25-year-old gentleman mysteriously died of heart failure in his sleep:
He is/was a well-known actor in many TV series in the LoS and in a Netflix film about the LoS cave rescue.
I obviously have no knowledge of this young man’s medical history. But a crazed conspiracy theorist might suspect that he too had been Pfizered.
Maybe we were lucky in the UK that we mainly used the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine which was based on well-known, tried-and-tested technology. There were problems with a few people from the Oxford/Astra/Zeneca vaccine (venous thromboembolism and thrombocytopenia). But it’s not clear if these were due to the vaccine itself or the fact that it was administered without aspiration and therefore accidentally went straight into the veins a couple of people per million vaccines administered.
But by rubbishing the cheap, old-fashioned Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine due to their fury at the UK leaving their beloved EU and by buying the ludicrously expensive, incredibly profitable for Pfizer and possibly dangerous Pfizer concoction instead, preening popinjay Macron, grumpy old fart Merkel and the always perfectly-coiffed recidivist incompetent Ursula Fond of Lying may have condemned thousands of their own citizens to unnecessary heart damage and hundreds to premature deaths.
I find the attitudes of the woke, West-hating, virtue-signalling, Greta-worshipping, anti-progress, globalist, self-styled supposed progressives more than incomprehensible. What we have in the West is far from perfect and is open to criticism, particularly due to the depressingly low quality of our kakistocratic leaders. But our reasonably-functioning democracy is such a rarity that it should be cherished and not constantly sneeringly denigrated.
Democracies such as we have in the West have existed for less than the last 100 years of human history. Moreover, even in today’s world, they are a rarity.
There are multiple theories about what specific elements are required for a government to qualify as a democracy. For example, in preparing its annual Democracy Index, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EUI) scores each of the world’s countries in five distinct categories—which we can examine to determine several of the Economist’s democratic wish list:
A pluralistic system in which at least two legitimate-but-different political parties coexist
A free and fair electoral process that enables the people to choose between candidates from those parties
A government that operates openly and transparently, works for the good of all the people, respects its own rules, has proper checks and balances, and gives its citizens free choice and control over their lives
Politically engaged citizens who support democratic principles, “fight fair”, vote regularly, accept the will of the voters, and commit to a peaceful transfer of power after each election
An emphasis on preserving civil liberties and personal freedoms of both the majority and minorities
A free and independent media unhindered by government interference, influence, or intimidation
Of the 165 countries included in the EUI Democracy Index:
23 (14%) are considered Full Democracies
51 (31%) are called Flawed Democracies
34 (21%) are rated as Hybrid Regimes
57 (34%) are classed as Authoritarian Regimes
Looking at the EUI Democracy Index, I believe the EUI has been implausibly generous to many countries. But even if we accept the EUI’s Democracy Index classification:
there are only 23 (14%) of the world’s countries where you have something resembling Democracy
“Flawed Democracies” include totally corrupt hell-holes like Mexico which is run by drug cartels and Albania which is run by violent criminal gangs
“Hybrid Regimes” include such earthly paradises as Turkey which has a sham parliament but is actually run by the president, his family and his cronies and uber-corrupt failed states like Lebanon
members of the “Authoritarian Regimes” club include godforsaken disasters such as Venezuela, Iran, China and, of course, the glorious, prosperous, well-run Peoples Republic of North Korea.
When you realise how few countries even today provide any reasonable level of freedom for their citizens, you might be tempted to conclude that the navel-gazing, self-promoting, holier-than-thou, politically-correct, libtard, intellectually-challenged, self-proclaimed progressives and much of the mainstream media, furiously arguing about how many genders there are and which pronouns to use, have slightly lost their sense of perspective about what is important and what is not.
This blog will be rather trivial compared to my normal stuff. So I’ll only leave it up for one day.
Part of the reason it will be trivial is that I’ve just returned from a period abroad in a country generally thought of as being rather ‘exotic’ and so haven’t had time to catch up with what is happening in the world. Moreover, jetlag isn’t great for one’s powers of concentration.
The country I was visiting is famed for its wonderful weather, perfect beaches, clear turquoise seas, many islands, fabulous food and friendly people. It is often referred to as the LoS (Land of Smells or Land of Smiles – you choose). It’s also know for various entertainments of a rather adult nature which, for reasons of good taste, I am reticent to discuss in any detail.
For many visitors, especially males, going to the LoS is the nearest they’ll ever get to Paradise without actually leaving this mortal coil.
While I was in the LoS, there was an incident which attracted worldwide attention. A famous sportsperson, whom we’ll call ‘Bruce’, had gone on a ‘lads’ holiday’ with a couple of friends. On the first day of his holiday, Bruce died of a heart attack despite having played sport all his life and despite only being just over fifty years old.
The official version
The official version of Bruce’s demise was that he had been suffering ill-health for some time, had just been on a fairly brutal 2-week liquid-only diet to get in shape for his holiday and had been complaining of chest pains for several days before his holiday. To try to relax after their long flight, Bruce and his mates had reportedly invited four highly-qualified local masseuses to their holiday villa. Two of the highly-qualified masseuses apparently attended to Bruce while the other two looked after Bruce’s mates. There is cctv footage from the villa where Bruce and his chums were staying featuring the four highly-qualified masseuses all leaving together after their work with Bruce and his chums was finished.
Following his massage by two highly-qualified local masseuses, Bruce went to sleep and sadly had a heart attack and never woke up.
This version of Bruce’s passing suited Bruce’s home country where he was a national hero and was given a state funeral. So nobody there was interested in suggesting that Bruce’s passing had been in any way connected with any activities that might be considered in any way slightly louche. It also suited the authorities in the LoS as for years they had been trying to promote their country as a family tourism destination and had been trying to get rid of the LoS’s reputation as a must-go destination for the world’s mongers:
The alternative version?
Unpleasant people of a cynical nature might, however, be tempted to ascribe Bruce’s passing to a little more than the explanation given by the authorities in Bruce’s home country and in the LoS.
Such people, might even have imagined that the four local ladies who visited Bruce and his chums weren’t actually highly-qualified masseuses but rather were ladies who earned their living providing services which went slightly beyond what most people would consider a traditional massage. Such people might even have speculated that, during the ‘massages’, there was ‘partying’, generous quantities of alcohol were consumed and that even a certain well-known blue pill designed to assist male performance and endurance might have been used.
There is nothing in this alternative version of events which contradicts the official version. But it does add a little local colour and culture and maybe gives some insight as to why the unfortunate Bruce’s heart was put under so much strain that it gave up the ghost?
Such cynics might even go as far as to suggest that Bruce went out with a bang. Though I would never sink so low.
There’s a new report out from the International Energy Agency (IEA) (whoever they are?) recommending that we plebs be encouraged/forced to use less energy.
In the face of the emerging global energy crisis triggered by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, practical actions by governments and citizens in advanced economies and beyond can achieve significant reductions in oil demand in a matter of months, reducing the risk of a major supply crunch, according to new analysis released by the International Energy Agency today.
These efforts would reduce the price pain being felt by consumers around the world, lessen the economic damage, shrink Russia’s hydrocarbon revenues, and help move oil demand towards a more sustainable pathway.
If fully carried out in advanced economies, the measures recommended by the IEA’s new 10-Point Plan to Cut Oil Usewould lower oil demand by 2.7 million barrels a day within four months – equivalent to the oil demand of all the cars in China. This would significantly reduce potential strains at a time when a large amount of Russian supplies may no longer reach the market and the peak demand season of July and August is approaching. The measures would have an even greater effect if adopted in part or in full in emerging economies as well.
Here are the ten recommended actions:
Reduce speed limits on highways by at least 10 km/h Impact*: Saves around 290 kb/d of oil use from cars, and an additional 140 kb/d from trucks
Work from home up to three days a week where possible Impact: One day a week saves around 170 kb/d; three days saves around 500 kb/d
Car-free Sundays in cities
Impact: Every Sunday saves around 380 kb/d; one Sunday a month saves 95 kb/d
Make the use of public transport cheaper and incentivise micromobility, walking and cycling Impact: Saves around 330 kb/d
Alternate private car access to roads in large cities Impact: Saves around 210 kb/d
Increase car sharing and adopt practices to reduce fuel use Impact: Saves around 470 kb/d
Promote efficient driving for freight trucks and delivery of goods Impact: Saves around 320 kb/d
Using high-speed and night trains instead of planes where possible Impact: Saves around 40 kb/d
Avoid business air travel where alternative optionsexist Impact: Saves around 260 kb/d
Reinforce the adoption of electric and more efficient vehicles Impact: Saves around 100 kb/d
At the moment, the IEA claims these actions are necessary temporary measures to deal with the energy supply problems caused by the Russian invasion of Ukraine. But at the end of the report comes the interesting bit:
The IEA report notes that reducing oil use must not remain a temporary measure. Sustained reductions are important not only to improve countries’ energy security but also to tackle climate change and reduce air pollution.
Our rulers have plans for us – making our lives more restricted, more controlled and an awful lot poorer in all aspects.
I’m currently reading a 2006 book “NEXT” by the brilliant American author Michael Crichton.
John Michael Crichton; October 23, 1942 – November 4, 2008) was an American author and filmmaker. His books have sold over 200 million copies worldwide, and over a dozen have been adapted into films. His literary works are usually within the science fiction, techno-thriller and medical fiction area, and heavily feature technology. His novels often explore technology and failures of human interaction with it, especially resulting in catastrophes with biotechnology. Many of his novels have medical or scientific underpinnings, reflecting his medical training and scientific background at Harvard Medical School.
He’s probably best known as the author of “THE ANDROMEDA STRAIN”, “STATE OF FEAR” and “JURASSIC PARK”.
“NEXT” was the last full book published before his death in 2008.
Crichton’s warning about scientists
In “NEXT” Crichton wrote:
“The ultimate lesson is that science isn’t special – at least not anymore. Maybe back when Einstein talked to Niels Bohr, and there were only a few dozen important workers in every field. But now there are three million researchers in America. It’s no longer a calling, it’s a career. Science is as corruptible a human activity as any other. Its practitioners aren’t saints, they’re human beings, and they do what humans do – lie, cheat, steal from one another, sue, hide data, fake data, overstate their own importance and denigrate opposing views unfairly. That’s human nature. It isn’t going to change.”
Our scientists lied and lied and lied
When this paragraph was written 16 years ago, most people would probably have dismissed this as typical storyteller’s dramatisation and exaggeration. But now we know how right Crichton was.
Our scientists lied to us about the origin of the Wuhan lab-leaked plague, lied to us about the numbers who died from or with Covid, lied to us about the effectiveness of the “miracle vaccines”, lied to us about the safety (or rather lack of safety) of the “miracle vaccines” and lied to us about the likely death toll so they could present the worst case scenarios to terrify us into compliance with their ever more oppressive rules.
In all their lying and posturing and self-promotion, the scientists were egged on to make ever more outlandish doomsday claims by a totally irresponsible mainstream media desperate to churn out the most bloodcurdling clickbait stories
Scientists or just careerist media whores?
In addition to the flood of lies, there is one other aspect of our scientists’ behaviour I found particularly concerning – their apparent desperation to prostitute themselves to any media who might be prepared to interview them.
I naively thought that when one was invited to join a government advisory committee such as the ludicrously-misnamed SAGE, two rules would apply
Confidentiality – I would have expected Chatham House rules to apply
Multi-disciplinary – members would understand that theirs was only their own personal point of view from their particular academic discipline and that it was politicians’ job to balance things like immediate health issues, longer-term health issues and economic concerns.
This doesn’t appear to have occurred to the overpaid, over-pensioned, self-promoting members of SAGE. It seems that after every meeting, they would be rushing off to the nearest TV studios and newspaper offices to inform us that they alone knew exactly what needed to be done and that their, and only their, recommended policy was the right one.
These opinion-incontinent, self-promoting, media-whoring supposed “scientists” showed no understanding that confidentiality might sometimes be appropriate and absolutely no awareness that they were only seeing one small aspect of more complex policy issues.
Which brings us to “catastrophic man-made climate change”
Given what we’ve learnt from the scientists’ dishonest, self-aggrandising, deliberately-misleading, media-whoring behaviour over Xi Pingpong’s Chinese Communist Party’s lab-leaked plague, why on earth would anyone believe anything our research-grant hungry, self-promoting, careerist, data-manipulating, lying, media-prostitute supposed scientists claim about the idiotic concept of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change?
And why would anyone believe anything the utterly irresponsible, self-serving, clickbait mainstream media told us either?
As far as I know, the three main works of fiction dealing with a pandemic are:
the science fiction classic novel “THE DARKEST OF NIGHTS” by Charles Eric Maine
the 1995 film “OUTBREAK” starring Dustin Hoffman and Morgan Freeman
the film “CONTAGION” made by Steven Soderbergh in 2011 starring Matt Damon
These three works all have one thing in common – they all start from the premise that the deadly virus evolved naturally in an animal and then spread to humans.
I suspect that the idea a pandemic might have been caused by America’s top medics using millions of US taxpayers’ dollars funding bioweapons research in a filthy, badly-managed, unhygienic, utterly corrupt lab in America’s arch enemy China after channelling the money through a front company in order to hide its origin was probably so far-fetched that it would never have occurred to the people behind THE DARKEST OF NIGHTS, OUTBREAK or CONTAGION.
That America’s top medics would then be protected by a massive cover-up by one of America’s two main political parties, the Democrats, the mainstream media, the tech giants and by many of the world’s leading and formerly respected scientists after over 6 million deaths and hundreds of millions of lives ruined – well that was simply too cynical, too evil and too ludicrously implausible for any work of fiction.
Yet that’s precisely what has happened.
WTF was the US Department of Defence up to in the Ukraine?
A few days ago, Russia claimed that the US had been involved in funding the development of lethal bioweapons in the Ukraine. These claims were, of course, angrily dismissed by US officials and the supinely obedient mainstream media as ridiculous Russian propaganda.
Only problem is – they are actually true. The US Department of Defence had been passing millions of dollars to labs in the Ukraine which the Soviets had originally been using to research bioweapons.
It seems that one day most of humanity will be wiped out by bioweapons rather than in a nuclear holocaust. Still, let’s look on the bright side. That should make the Extinction Rebellion climate catastrophist lunatics happy when much of the human race is exterminated by some crazies who manage to smuggle the latest bioweapon out of a lab and release it into the human population. After all, a few billion fewer people will mean less CO2 being released into the atmosphere.
Here’s the brilliant Mark Steyn on GB News explaining what was happening. You should start watching from about 6 minutes 40 seconds into the video and stay till at least 24 minutes.
Please note that the experiments Fauci and friends were carrying out in Wuhan in a supposedly Biosafety level-4 lab were on coronavirus pathogens with a survival rate of around 99.6%. The experiments the US Department of Defense was funding in the Ukraine on some of the most dangerous pathogens known to mankind (survival rate of around 50%) were being done in a Biosafety level-3 lab.
This is so irresponsible, you couldn’t make this up. Though perhaps amusingly, the virus described in the science fiction classic THE DARKEST OF NIGHTS also had a survival rate of only 50%.
A serious lab leak from the Ukrainian Biosafety level-3 labs has the potential to wipe out half the human race – almost 4 billion people. Yet, as far as I know, none of the traditional mainstream media has deemed this story sufficiently significant to warrant their attention:
You probably know that Pfizer and the US health authorities (the FDA – Food and Drug Administration) had originally planned to release all the data around the effects of the Pfizer miracle vaccine over a period of about 75 years. The excuse given for such a long delay was that there were hundreds of thousands of pages of data. This excuse was, of course, ludicrous as all the ‘pages’ of data would have been in electronic form and so could be fully released at any time if Pfizer and the FDA so wished.
This cunning plan, which could have been devised by Blackadder’s Baldrick, would, of ensure, that all those involved in the development, approval and administering of the vaccines would have long since retired and probably died well before the real gory stuff became public knowledge.
From what little I understand, Pfizer’s/Baldrick’s cunning plan just got blown out of the water when a group of US doctors filed a Freedom of Information request demanding that Pfizer and the FDA release the data now. When Pfizer and the FDA refused, the doctors went to court and won their case when the judge instructed Pfizer and the FDA to release agreed quantities of data by certain fixed agreed dates.
Injuries and deaths
The first batch of data has apparently been released and indicates that there were over 42,000 serious ‘adverse events’ (AEs) and 1,223 deaths in just the first two months of the Pfizer vaccine being given emergency approval. What Pfizer and the FDA ‘forgot’ to tell us is how many hundreds of thousands or how many millions of people were vaccinated in these two months. So it’s impossible to calculate whether the levels of AEs and deaths were within acceptable norms or whether they indicated that there were serious problems with the vaccine.
How our leaders lied and lied and lied
What is clear is that our rulers lied and lied and lied about the supposed ‘safety’ of the miracle vaccines. The medical authorities in all countries where the vaccines were used would have been fully aware of the level of AEs and deaths from the Pfizer vaccine. But they deliberately, with the enthusiastic help of the fawning mainstream media, kept this information from us as they knew public awareness of the dangers of the Pfizer vaccine would fuel massive resistance to all the vaccines.
Here’s Dr John Campbell trying to make sense of the Pfizer data that has been released, why we weren’t told about this information at the time and why the mainstream media seems completely uninterested in even covering the story now:
(if you have time, I believe it’s worth watching this video till the end)
David Craig, on March 30th, 2022
