A most curious situation has emerged in the South Coast holiday town of Bournemouth. If I remember the details correctly, a 40-year-old woman was raped on Bournemouth beach a couple of days ago.
Bournemouth’s ultra-effective police have made the usual appeals for help from the public. But, Bournemouth’s much-admired police have refused to issue any details about the suspect.
This seems odd to me. I have never raped anyone. Nor, fortunately, have I ever been raped. But from the little I understand about the act of rape, the person raped – the rapee – would have been in fairly close contact with the rapist. Therefore the rapee would surely have some knowledge of the rapist’s height, weight, hair colour, any facial hair and, of course, skin colour and thus possible ethnicity. Yet the world-famous Bournemouth police – whose duty it is to protect the law-abiding community – have asked for the public’s help to catch the rapist, but have refused to give any details about the rapist which might help the public identify the perpetrator.
I obviously don’t follow every story about rapes. But I do vaguely recall some concern expressed by the good citizens of Bournemouth when over 600 illegal migrants were put into hotels near Bournemouth beach where there been several rapes recently.
Now, of course, there may be no connection at all between the apparent increase in rapes in Bournemouth, the number of illegal migrants from Third-world, women-hating, excrement-covered hell-holes of corruption and misery and the apparent reluctance of Bournemouth’s universally-respected plods to give any details about the skin colour and ethnicity of the rapist. But being a nasty, cynical person, I would be far from surprised were we to eventually learn that the rapist happens to be a recent arrival from somewhere like Afghanistan, Syria or Iraq.
By the way, the BBC has provided a tool by which you can find out how many ‘rapists’ – sorry, of course I meant how many ‘illegal migrants’ – sorry again, what I really meant was, of course, Starmer’s ‘adorable’ and future Labour-voting multi-cultural enrichers’ – are being put up in hotels and other accommodation near where you live.
Some people have been bleating about how Rachel Reeves’s brilliant tax rises are hastening the demise of British pubs. We’re told that around two pubs a day are closing. This seems to be an accelerating trend as ‘only’ 336 British pubs closed their doors forever in 2025. There are currently still around 46,000 operating pubs in Britain.
Our glorious Labour government doesn’t really like pubs. After all, they could be places where disgruntled mainly White British people meet and rage against our useless, oppressive, free-speech-crushing, treacherous, anti-British government. Moreover, for obvious reasons, our government’s favourite demographic – the demographic which is taking over our country – is unlikely to frequent their local boozer.
But I have an idea. As Britain increasingly turns into the Islamic Caliphate of Britanistan, we’re not going to need too many pubs any more. But what we definitely will need are more mosques.
Iran has a population of around 90 million and an estimated 50,000 mosques. The population of Britain is officially about 69.9 million. But I think we all know it’s actually much higher than that. Moreover, with the ‘welcome the Third World’ open borders policies of the current Labour government and of the ‘keep Farage out‘ Labour/LibDem/Green/Gaza alliance which is likely to be our next government, the UK’s population will soon be heading up towards the 90 million too.
But we only have around 2,100 mosques. That won’t be sufficient for when Britain becomes an Islamic Caliphate. But there is an obvious solution – turn thousands of Britain’s increasingly bankrupt pubs into mosques. This will make good use of the buildings. And conveniently, if most of Britain’s rapidly closing pubs are turned into mosques, we’d soon have about the same number of mosques as in Iran. What’s not to like about that?
Of course, there are some horrible cynical, nasty, politically-incorrect people, such as those who made the video below, who are critical of the Islamification of our country. But we open-minded, progressive, liberal, illegal-migrant-hugging people know we should just ignore these bigoted, narrow-minded, hopeless-loser doom-mongers.
By the way, if you watch the video below on YouTube you’ll see some classic viewers’ comments.
Being an extremely boring person with no friends, no love and no social life, I was looking at some figures yesterday. That’s the kind of thing I do to fill my empty days.
I looked at the growth/reduction in CO2 emissions for several countries for the period 2014 to 2024 and compared these to growth/reduction in GDP per Capita for these countries.
CO2 is, of course – depending on your viewpoint:
a wonderful gas which is the basis for all life on Earth and increases in atmospheric CO2 levels are leading to a greening of the Earth
an evil poison which will destroy mankind due to CO2’s role in supposedly causing ‘Global Boiling’.
Here are the 5 countries with the greatest increase in CO2 emissions for the period 2014 to 2024:
Vietnam – CO2 emissions up 106% – GDP per Capita growth over 65%
Indonesia – CO2 emissions up 63% – GDP per Capita growth over 40%
India – CO2 emissions up 49%% – GDP per Capita growth over 72%
Turkey – CO2 emissions up 40% – GDP per Capita growth over 24%
China – CO2 emissions up 23% – GDP per Capita growth over 75%
And here are the five countries with the greatest reductions in CO2 emissions:
1. Britain – CO2 emissions down 29% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about 4%
2. Germany – CO2 emissions down 28% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about 11%
3. Japan – CO2 emissions down 24% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about minus 12%
4. Italy – CO2 emissions down 14% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about 9%
5. Brazil – CO2 emissions down 13% – GDP per Capita growth over 10 years about minus 16%
(Please note that the GDP per Capita growth/decline rates for the above five countries are not ‘per year’, they are the total for the ten year period)
Obviously each of these countries will have specific political and economic reasons for the level of GDP per Capita growth or decline over the 10 years from 2014 to 2024. But there nevertheless seems to be a correlation that most people will find blindingly obvious – the countries with the highest increases in CO2 emissions generally have the highest growth rates while the countries with the greatest reductions in CO2 emissions have the worst growth/decline rates.
We all could have guessed this. But please nobody tell ‘Mad’ Ed Miliband otherwise he will double down on cutting Britain’s CO2 emissions in order to impoverish us all even faster than he is so successfully doing at the moment.
Most of our media and talking heads all agree that President Trump is ‘mad’, ‘deluded’, ‘unpredictable’, psychologically unbalanced’, unfit to be president’ etc etc etc
But they deliberately overlook his successes:
He virtually stopped illegal immigration over the US’s southern border and has deported tens of thousands of illegals, many of them dangerous criminals. Perhaps our Trump-criticising rulers might tell us why they have failed to do this in Europe and the UK?
The US economy grew by 2.1% in 2025 compared to the EU’s 1.5% and the UK’s 1.4%. Under the rule of Mr Merz, the German Chancellor, who has been outspoken in his criticism of Trump, the German economy grew by about 0.2% in 2025. Perhaps our Trump-hating rulers could explain why Trump’s America has a better growth rate than their countries? It would also be interesting to hear from Mr Merz as to why Trump’s America’s growth rate in 2025 was over 10 times that of Herr Merz’s Germany? How about it, Herr Merz?
Trump has criticised NATO countries for hiding behind American military might, backed the other NATO countries into a corner over their failure to spend enough on their defence and several are now rapidly increasing their defence spending.
Trump has exposed the ‘Global Boiling’ scam for the nonsense it always was and has scrapped all the grifter subsidies which were pushing up US energy prices. Meanwhile the EU and Britain continue to pursue the ruinous, economically-suicidal ‘green’ policies which are destroying their industries, pushing up unemployment and turning their countries into post-industrial wastelands. Perhaps our Trump-hating loser politicians could explain why energy costs in the EU are around three times those in the US and energy costs in the UK are around four times those in the US? I’m sure a lot of people would be interested to hear an explanation? How about it Mr Starmer and Mr Miliband?
But it may be in foreign policy where Trump has been most successful. Taking out Venezuela’s Maduro and his wife was a move of genius. It has brought Venezuela under effective US control at minimum cost to the US and the US now decides where Venezuelan oil can go and how the country’s oil wealth can be spent. But the Maduro extraction and imprisonment also brought another benefit to the US – it has destroyed the Cuban economy and Cuba may soon be begging the US for help. I suspect the US will be only too willing to help Cuba providing the US gets significant control of the Cuban economy and political system. Trump got two birds with one stone.
Now everybody is blaming Trump for blundering into a war with Iran. But nobody seems interested in discussing what would have happened if America and Israel had not attacked. It’s clear now, from the vast number of ballistic missiles, drones and amount of enriched uranium that Iran had that Iran was intent on destroying Israel and bringing the whole Middle East under a nuclear- and missile-armed Iranian control. This had to be stopped.
Of course, defeating the suicidal, fanatical IRGC won’t be easy. The world found out how difficult beating death-obsessed, reality-denying fanatics can be when confronting Japan in WWII. And we all know the quote from some Prussian general “No plan survives first contact with the enemy” or, as MIke Tyson so eloquently said, “Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face”. So there will be some setbacks to come in the confrontation with the murderous lunatics controlling Iran.
But one side of the Iranian conflict many observers might be missing is its effect on the US’s greatest economic and military rival – China. We can’t trust any economic data published by the beloved Chinese Communist Party (CCP). But various sources suggest that unemployment is soaring in China with factories closing, real estate companies collapsing and tens of millions facing ruin. Somewhere between 6 and 10 million Chinese will spend the next 20 years paying off the debt they took on to buy properties which will never be completed. Youth employment is officially around 17% but is probably well over 25% as, due to the difficulty of finding jobs, some young people are paying for services to pretend they are working, with such companies appearing in major cities.
The CCP claims that China’s GDP grew by 5.0% in 2025, meeting the government’s, and in some cases exceeding, growth targets. Yet this was despite factory closures, a property sector downturn and weak consumer spending. I’m sure the CCP will claim GDP growth of 5%-6% for 2026. But by the end of 2025, China was importing up to about 1.4 million barrels per day (mbd) from Iran, representing 13% of its total crude imports and some 80% to 90% of Tehran’s oil exports. Moreover, prior to Maduro’s holiday in the US, China was the primary buyer of Venezuelan oil, with estimates suggesting at least 5% of China’s crude oil imports came from Venezuela – over 90% of Venezuela’s exports went to China.
Incidentally, Vietnam’s GDP growth in 2025 was over 8%, mainly due to companies moving manufacturing from China to Vietnam.
So, by grabbing hold of Venezuela and by pummelling Iran, Trump may be killing two birds with one stone – thrashing Venezuela and Iran while at the same time severely damaging America’s enemies – Cuba and China?
‘Sir’ Keir Starmer lets tens of thousands of illegal male migrants of military age often from countries which teach that all Jews should be killed to invade our country and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when there is a rise in anti-semitic attacks.
‘Sir’ Keir promises to “smash the gangs” and “stop the boats” but does sweet FA. In fact, he ensures that Britain remains the most attractive destination in the world for illegals. Then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised that people start to believe he is an impotent, putrid, lying PoS.
‘Sir’ Keir Starmer brings in new laws targetting landlords imposing new rules and regulations and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when many landlords sell up, the number of rental properties fall, demand is much greater than supply and rental prices rise making it more difficult for people to find somewhere affordable to rent. Once again ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised.
‘Sir’ Keir Starmer deliberately distances Britain from our greatest ally, the US, in order to drag Britain back into the EU, which consistently exploits our country, and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when the US questions whether Britain can be a trusted ally.
‘Sir’ Keir gives away strategically-important British territory, the Chagos Islands, and about £35 billion of British taxpayers’ money to a small corrupt country, Mauritius, largely run by the Chinese Communist Party and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people start to view him as a UK-hating, treacherous scumbag.
‘Sir’ Keir volunteers his time and professional knowledge to help his human rights lawyer chums pursue lucrative legal cases against British soldiers for events which happened decades ago, when many of the British soldiers were just young squaddies aged 19 or 20, and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when our military feels they have lost the backing of the political class and the military have difficulty in recruiting. Yes, ‘Sir’ Keir is once again surprised.
‘Sir’ Keir’s hopeless Chancellor imposes huge tax increases on any business with employees and then ‘Sir’ Keir and his waste-of-skin Chancellor are surprised when businesses stop hiring, unemployment rises and the economy goes into recession. Yet again ‘Sir’ Keir is really surprised.
‘Sir’ Keir’s foul-mouthed, pig-ignorant gobshite former deputy prime minister crushes businesses with new restrictive labour laws and then ‘Sir’ Keir and the (tax avoiding?) gobshite are surprised when many companies are afraid to risk taking on new employees. Another surprise for ‘Sir’ Keir and his gang.
‘Sir’ Keir is both surprised and very very angry indeed when he finds out what everybody else has known for years – that his choice for UK ambassador to the US is a bit of a recidivist wrong ‘un. This time ‘Sir’ Keir is both surprised and extremely extremely angry that nobody told him what everybody already knew.
‘Sir’ Keir lets crazed eco-lunatic Mad Ed MIliband impose the highest energy prices in the developed world on British households and businesses due to Miliband Junior’s monomaniacal ‘renewable energy’ fantasies and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when British oil refineries, steel works, chemical factories, glassworks and other industries close their UK operations throwing thousands of skilled workers out of a job. It’s all a bit of a surprise to ‘Sir’ Keir and madman Miliband.
‘Sir’ Keir also lets the (IMHO) mentally deranged, life-long parasite Miliband Junior block any new drilling for oil or gas in the North Sea and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when Britain’s former thriving oil capital Aberdeen becomes an impoverished ghost town and Britain has to expensively import oil and gas from other countries. ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised as he never expected this might result from preventing Britain from using its own energy resources.
‘Sir’ Keir and his inept Chancellor keep borrowing and borrowing and borrowing money Britain can never pay back and then nasal robotic ‘Sir’ Keir and his equally nasal and robotic Chancellor are surprised when about 90% of the money we are now borrowing is needed just to pay the interest on the money we have already borrowed. That surprises ‘Sir’ Keir and his (IMHO) ponderous intellectually-challenged, serially-incompetent sidekick.
‘ Sir’ Keir gives massive handouts to those who contribute absolutely nothing to our country – the ever-expanding public sector and the ever-increasing armies of those who can’t be arsed to work – while asphyxiating the productive parts of our economy with constantly-increasing taxes and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when businesses view Britain as hostile to private enterprise and decide to invest their money elsewhere. Just another surprise for ‘Sir’ Keir.
‘Sir’ Keir (and also allegedly Lady Victoria Sponger) take thousands of pounds of free stuff from Lord Alibaba and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people start to think he was lying when he promised a government of openness and integrity. Surprise after surprise for ‘Sir’ Keir.
‘Sir’ Keir sets up a two-tier ‘justice’ system in which White British are brutally punished for the slightest wrong-thought or wrong-speech while the invading masses are let off lightly however heinous their crimes and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people refer to him as “two-tier Keir”.
‘Sir’ Keir does almost everything in his power to block a public inquiry into the rape gangs brutalising tens of thousands of White British, often underage girls in order to keep the Muslim vote for Labour and then ‘Sir’ Keir is surprised when people think he is a brazen liar whenever he blethers on about protecting British women and girls.
There are many many other things which seem to surprise probably the most useless, loathed, incompetent, anti-British Prime Minister in our history. Life must be exciting for ‘Sir’ Keir as each day seems to bring a new surprise.
In the former Soviet Union, people used to joke: “We pretend to work and they pretend to pay us”.
But in Britain for many people the situation has become: “There’s no point working as they still pay us”.
Many jobs are interesting, intellectually satisfying and fulfil important social and financial needs. But many are not – they’re repetitive, boring, unsatisfying and often badly paid.
Unemployment in Britain is officially around 5.2%. That’s about 1.78 million people. But I think we all know these figures are nonsense. Approximately 9.1 to 9.4 million working-age people (aged 16–64) in the UK are economically inactive—meaning they are not working and not looking for work. This group includes students, those with long-term sickness, and people with caring responsibilities, representing roughly 21-22% of the working-age population. Of these more than 9 million, 2.8 million people are inactive due to health conditions, a 40% rise since 2019 and a figure which increases by thousands every week.
So real unemployment is probably at least 4.58 million – over 13% – but most likely even higher than that.
When we work, we are engaging in a trade – we’re selling our time and (hopefully) skills for money. Usually this is in the expectation that this money will allow us to buy a property, maybe start a family and live a reasonably productive life. But, if there is no hope of most jobs providing such things, why would many people want to work?
Buying a home has become an unaffordable luxury for many millions however hard they work:
And those who can’t afford to buy are being crucified by rents rising mush faster than wages:
Meanwhile those at the top seem to be grabbing ever more of our wealth:
With some company bosses being paid extraordinary amounts:
Looking at this situation, many people may feel all the cards are stacked against them.
Then when you add in the fact that benefits can pay more than full-time work, millions would be making a rational choice to just decide that it’s not worth bothering to go out to work.
At least one million people are now out of work and claiming overlapping sickness and housing benefits alongside Personal Independence Payment (PIP), according to analysis by the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ), following a surge in claims for mental health conditions.
The think tank warns that the rising tide of welfare dependency is being felt most acutely among young people, with almost one million under 25s now out of work or training. Recent CSJ research revealed that by 2026 there will be more than a £2,500 gap between earnings and combined benefit income. A full time worker on the National Living Wage (NLW) is expected to earn £22,500 after paying income tax and national insurance. By comparison, an economically inactive claimant on Universal Credit (UC) for ill health with the average housing benefit and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) would receive an income of around £25,000, rising to £27,500 for those awarded PIP’s highest rate.
And that’s just a brief glance at why we’re becoming a “There’s no point working as they still pay us”. country.
This may be fun for a while. But it inevitably leads to national bankruptcy. Time to get in the popcorn and a few beers.
Well, you won’t see this reported on the BBC or in any of the British mainstream media. A Florida senator has just issued a short video branding our great Prime Minister “a spineless coward”.
And while we’re on the subject of stories being carefully ignored/avoided by the British mainstream media, I propose that you go on to YouTube and search for Simon Webb’s ‘History Debunked’ videos. Most people probably aren’t aware that the trial of some young Ukrainian gentlemen started at the Old Bailey a couple of days ago. Simon Webb’s ‘History Debunked’ channel seems to be the only media reporting on the progress of the trial. I wonder why the trial has not been covered on the BBC and in the UK mainstream media? Surely they’re not trying to gaslight us?
In this blog, I attach a link to a 4-minute video talk given by the son of the former Shah of Iran. I realise that the former Shah wasn’t a terribly nice chap and not the kind of person you’d invite home to meet your mum and dad. After all, he rather liked having his secret police arresting, torturing and killing political opponents. But his son, Reza Pahlavi, seems like a decent sort and is probably the only figure who can help oversee the transition of Iran from an Islamic hell-hole to a modern democracy if the crazed mad mullahs and the IRGC can be overthrown.
I noticed a BBC report a few days ago in which the BBC correspondent claimed to be interviewing ‘ordinary Iranians’. Of course, all those interviewed said that they were against the war and that Donald Trump and the Americans were to blame. What the BBC didn’t mention was that, if those interviewed failed to declare their undying support for the mad mullahs and IRGC, they would be arrested, tried and hanged. The thought of a hangman’s noose is an excellent way to encourage loyalty.
I think I have also heard several BBC contributors refer to the IRGC as the “Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps” rather than the real title – “The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps“. This is quire a subtle way of the BBC’s quisling, Islamophiliac, Israel-hating garbage gaslighting us. The BBC may be trying to make it look like the murderous, corrupt IRGC are some kind of patriotic Iranian military force rather than an oppressive, fanatical and dangerous bunch of terrorists.
But the real problem with almost all western media reporting of the Iran conflict is probably Trump Derangement Syndrome. The media constantly claims that Trump has blundered, that Trump has started a “forever war” (it has only been going about 7 weeks), that the IRGC are winning etc etc etc. Our media seems to have brushed aside the slaughter of 5,000 or 10,000 or 20,000 or more innocent protestors in the streets of Iran’s cities and in hospitals because, when you loathe Trump (as most of our media do), the massacre of so many innocent Iranians is not something you wish to focus on.
Anyway, here’s Reza Pahlavi expressing his fury at the biased way western journalists are reporting the Iran conflict:
Most of us are probably fed up hearing about all the shenanigans around the appointment of Britain’s most honest and popular Lord, the Mandelson thing, as UK ambassador to Washington by Britain’s most honest and most popular prime minister – ‘Sir’ Keir Starmer. So, I won’t mention anything about this in today’s blog. Here’s something rather different.
Britain seems to have become the world’s welfare state – a welfare state with a country attached rather than a country with a welfare system
Approximately 46.7% of UK households pay more in taxes (direct and indirect) than they receive in benefits and public services, according to 2024 Office for National Statistics (ONS) data. Conversely, 53.3% of individuals live in households that are net recipients—receiving more in benefits, such as NHS care and education, than they contribute.
Income Concentration: Income tax is heavily concentrated among top earners. The top 10% of taxpayers contribute over 60% of total income tax receipts.
Top 1% Impact: The top 1% of UK taxpayers contribute around 33% of the total income tax collected
As of early 2026, approximately 9.1 to 9.3 million people aged 16 to 64 in the UK are “economically inactive,” meaning they are not in work and not looking for work. This represents a rate of roughly 21% of the working-age population.
What’s worse is that Labour are deliberately making this situation worse by:
increasing benefits for the skivers while increasing taxes on the strivers
blocking any attempts to reduce the rate of increase in the billions paid out in benefits
importing up to 50,000 pieces of largely uneducated, often unemployable, often rape-obsessed, often criminal pieces of Third-world garbage across the Channel each year by giving them more incentives than any other country to come to Britain – free hotels, free food, free money, free phones, free healthcare, free dentistry, free everything
Estimates for the lifetime cost of an “illegal migrant” to the British taxpayer vary significantly based on the assumptions made about their status (e.g., if they remain undocumented or are later granted amnesty) and their employment status.
Undocumented/Processing Phase Costs:
The Home Officehas estimated that supporting a single asylum seeker while their claim is processed for four years costs approximately £106,000.
Current daily costs for asylum accommodation (largely hotels) have been reported at roughly £6 million per day, or over £4 million per day for housing specifically, leading to an estimated £15.3 billion over the 10 years between 2019 and 2029.
Long-Term/Lifetime Impact Estimates:
Migration Watch UK Estimate: A 2010 report by Migration Watch UK estimated that if an illegal immigrant were granted amnesty (regularized), their net lifetime cost to the state would range from £220,000 for a single working person (though most of them will never work) to over £1 million for an unemployed family with two children.
But I expect most of us know that when you include all the social breakdown, trouble and criminality caused by our Third-world friends, the real costs of these people (parasites?) being in our country is much higher than these figures suggest.
Even the British government recognises that the present situation cannot continue. A government website tells us:
The UK asylum system is broken. The numbers arriving on small boats in 2022 exceeded 45,700, a 60% increase on the 28,500 who arrived in 2021..
These journeys are unnecessary, as those making these crossings are coming from safe countries, such as France, where they could have claimed asylum.
More recently, we have seen large numbers of people making these journeys who are from well-established safe countries, where it is clear they are not at risk of persecution.
It’s not fair that those coming to the UK with the intention of becoming economic migrants are able to exploit our asylum system, which should be prioritising those whose lives are genuinely at risk.
It’s also not fair on the British taxpayer. The current broken asylum system currently costs the UK some £3 billion a year and rising, including nearly £6 million a day on hotel accommodation.
We cannot continue, year on year, with this inexorable rise in the number of illegal arrivals adding unacceptable pressures on our health, housing, educational and welfare services.
But what is the British government doing about this catastrophe? Nothing, nada, zilch, zero. In fact, the British government seems intent on encouraging this Third-world invasion. We’re told race replacement is just a crazed conspiracy theory even though White British will be a minority in their own country by 2050 to 2060.
Of course, honest Sir Keir, that brave and noble knight of the realm, claims he is “smashing the gangs” and “stopping the boats”. But noble Sir Keir has never been known for his honesty.
David Craig, on May 10th, 2026
