Hopefully you’ve noticed the Establishment and mainstream media’s desperate efforts to destroy anyone daring to question the safety and effectiveness of the fake mRNA vaccines by accusing vaccine critics of spreading conspiracy theories.
Get Bridgen!
First was Tory MP Andrew Bridgen. You may remember he gave a speech in the House of Commons demanding that all use of mRNA vaccines should be stopped until proper safety analyses of risk vs benefit had been carried out. Of our 650 MPs, only about three actually attended during Bridgen’s speech. I suppose the other 646 MPs had much more important things to do than listen to a speech detailing the vast amounts of money (billions) wasted on the fake vaccines and the number of people (thousands) harmed by the fake vaccines. If I remember correctly, Bridgen, who has actually studied virology at university, unwisely quoted an Israeli expert comparing the vaccine damage to the Holocaust. That immediately led to Bridgen being falsely accused of anti-semitism and being expelled from the Tory party.
Get Neil Oliver!
Next up to be labelled antisemitic was GB News’s Neil Oliver. He has also been highly critical of the way the government has imposed lockdowns and vaccines and other controls on our lives. If I’ve got my facts right, I think he made a statement about ‘one-world government’ being imposed on us. Clearly (to me) he meant Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum and all the political leaders and billionaires who show up in Davos every year and who are all achingly keen to impose Covid lockdowns and then climate crisis lockdowns on us. But critics twisted his words and claimed Neil Oliver was making anti-semitic statements and should be banned from our TVs for spreading conspiracy theories:
Then we had the ‘get Mark Steyn’ attack. They couldn’t accuse Steyn of being anti-semitic as apparently his paternal great grandmother was Jewish though both his grandmothers were catholic. So instead Steyn was accused of spreading conspiracy theories and GB News was pressured into demanding that Steyn’s company compensate the news channel for any fines the useless Ofcom imposed on the channel as a result of any comments made by Steyn. Naturally Steyn refused and so was quickly dropped by GB News.
They’re not safe and they’re not effective
While this career destruction of anyone daring to question the safety and effectiveness of the fake mRNA vaccines is going on, the evidence is mounting that the fake vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The Florida Surgeon General has just revealed that there has been about a 4,400 percent increase in life-threatening conditions reported in the state to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since the 2021 rollout of the COVID-19 vaccines and he has written to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asking for them to “promote transparency in health care professionals to accurately communicate the risks these vaccines pose.”
In the US state of Idaho, two Idaho lawmakers have introduced a bill to charge those who administer mRNA vaccines with a misdemeanor. Sen. Tammy Nichols, R-Middleton, and Rep. Judy Boyle, R-Midvale, sponsored HB 154. It was introduced in the House Health & Welfare Committee on Feb. 15 by Nichols. According to the bill text, “A person may not provide or administer a vaccine developed using messenger ribonucleic acid technology for use in an individual or any other mammal in this state.”
Studies in Israel, Thailand and other countries have highlighted a large rise in the number of cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in young men following mRNA vaccines. Here’s a chart of footballers having heart attacks by year:
Though Reuters fact-check agrees with FIFA that there is no evidence of an increase in footballers having heart attacks:
Dr John Campbell was previously a great advocate for the vaccines. But gradually his excellent videos have shown his growing disillusion with the vaccines and his anger at the way the authorities are avoiding investigating the growing number of excess deaths following vaccination.
German newspaper Die Welt has reported that Pfizer may be sued for fraudulently altering the results of its clinical trials by taking out participants who had serious adverse effects and even died:
And in a recently-published scientific paper co-authored by none other than Anthony ‘Frankenstein’ Fauci (the man who some people believe was funding the Wuhan research which led to the Covid lab leak) has admitted that the mRNA vaccines don’t work as well as he had hoped. Fauci co-authored an article in the scientific journal Cell Host & Microbe that’s titled: “Rethinking next-generation vaccines for coronaviruses, influenza viruses, and other respiratory viruses.”
I have just come across what may be the most idiotic climate-change article of the year so far – a Euronews article claiming that climate change is triggering an increasing number of earthquakes:
It’s almost worth reading the article to understand how deranged the climate catastrophists are becoming.
The author claims that: ‘As melting glaciers change the distribution of weight across the Earth’s crust, the resulting “glacial isostatic adjustment” drives changes in plate tectonics that could lead to more earthquakes, awaken volcanoes and even affect the movement of the Earth’s axis.’
The author goes on to say: ‘Unfortunately, it is not just earthquakes. Climate and weather-related disasters have surged five-fold over the past five decades, killing over two million people, with 91% of the casualties in developing countries. And it is only getting worse.’
And the author concludes by blaming ‘Big Oil’: ‘Fossil fuel companies bear significant responsibility for the climate emergency yet enjoy near-total impunity. At the same time, they are consistently reaping record profits — while ordinary citizens across the globe struggle to pay their household bills.’
Nonsense on stilts?
Let’s try to deal with these three claims.
Melting glaciers causing earthquakes?
The eminent ‘expert’ claims that “melting glaciers change the distribution of weight across the Earth’s crust”. But I could equally well claim that the more glaciers there are, the heavier the weight on the Earth’s tectonic plates and therefore fewer glaciers will mean less weight on the tectonic plates. Moreover, the big glacier melt happened between 16,000 and 6,000 years ago when sea levels rose about 120 metres (120 cms per 100 years) compared to today’s rise of between 7cms and 20 cms per century (depending on whose figures you believe):
Of course, we don’t know how many earthquakes there were per year between 16,000 and 6,000 years ago. But given the relatively minor sea-level rise over the last century one might be tempted to doubt that melting glaciers really are causing the Earth’s tectonic nervous breakdown
Climate and weather disasters are getting worse?
Oddly, the figures tell us the exact opposite. In the last century climate-related deaths have fallen by over 90% even as atmospheric CO2 has risen from 300 parts per million to around 420 parts per million:
Here’s a chart of the main natural disaster deaths from 1900 to 2016:
And here’s another one:
‘Big Oil’ is to blame for the ‘climate emergency’
First of all, there is no climate emergency. In fact, as I explain in my book THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS, we’ve never had it so good.
Extreme poverty has fallen dramatically:
Until, the Chinese lab-leaked plague, fife expectancy around the world was rising:
And crop yields were continuously increasing:
And most of these improvements in the human condition have been mainly due to the availability of cheap, reliable fossil-fuel energy and fossil-fuel products
But I guess the moral of the story is that you can get any old rubbish published as long as you blame climate change.
What about earthquakes?
Here’s a mapping of the main earthquake zones which, of course follow the tectonic plates:
To fully understand if earthquakes are increasing you’d have to analyse all earthquakes each year and then maybe multiply each one by its severity on the Richter scale to give an approximation of each year’s seismic activity.
I’ve neither the time nor the inclination to do this. But I had a quick check on the 20 worst earthquakes in modern times and found that there seem to be clusters. There were 3 major earthquakes in the 1960s and 7 since the year 2000. So, looking just at recent history, it would be correct to sat there has been a rise in major earthquakes. But I humbly suggest this has absolutely nothing to do with supposed anthropogenic climate change:
In my last blog (Tuesday/Wednesday) I suggested how climate catastrophists use the “if ….., then ….. trick” to fool us into believing that climate Armageddon is just around the corner.
Then on Wednesday (yesterday), the Daily Mail published a perfect “if ….., then …..” story:
Global sea levels will rise by 4.6 FEET by 2150 if temperatures continue to rise at the current pace, study warns
The Mail article informs us that: “global mean sea level has risen by about 7.8 inches (20cm) in the past century and this trend is likely to accelerate with global warming, the researchers say.”
Google tells us that: between 1901 and 2018, the globally averaged sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10 in), or 1–2 mm per year on average. This rate is accelerating, and sea levels are now rising by 3.7 mm (0.146 inches) per year. Though the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) tells us that there has been no acceleration in sea level rise:
And this seems to be confirmed by most charts of sea levels which find no correlation between sea levels and rising levels of atmospheric CO2:
Then the Mail shows us a chart showing the likely rises in sea levels depending on how much we manage to cut CO2 emissions:
The Mail explains that: “The experts performed computer modelling simulations based on various climate scenarios. Under the worst-case scenario (weak emissions cuts) melted water from the two ice sheets will add 4.6 feet to sea levels by 2150.”
As you’ll see from this chart, sea-level rise seems fairly constant until the ‘scientists’ start their modelling. Then suddenly sea levels will apparently shoot up uncontrollably. Just to add to the doom and gloom, we’re told: “Unfortunately, the authors found that limiting global warming to 3.6°F (2° C) above pre-industrial levels – a key aim of the Paris Agreement – would be insufficient to slow down the rate of global sea level rise.”
I guess I have four main problems with this latest “if ….., then …..” nonsense on stilts:
there doesn’t appear to be any correlation between sea-level rise and atmospheric CO2 levels
even the IPCC states that there has been no acceleration in the rate of sea-level rise
the rise in sea levels appears to have been constant for as long as sea levels have been measured – over 200 years
the projected rise in sea levels at even the ‘intermediate’ scenario is ludicrous compared to what has happened for the last 200+ years
But at least the Daily Mail article does give a perfect illustration of what I have called the “if ….., then …. trick”.
First apologies for going AWOL for a few days. But I had a bit of a medical emergency. However, after blood tests, x-rays, scans and much else it turned out to be a false alarm.
The climate catastrophists’ “if ….., then …..” trick
The climate catastrophists have many ways of manipulating and faking facts and figures to beat us all into submission to their plans for us all to live much colder, more restricted, poorer lives. I expose some of these in my book THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS. But I’ve just come across one that I missed. I’ll call it the “if ….., then …..” trick.
It goes like this: the catastrophists make a claim such as “if such and such happens, then something awful will happen”. The clever part of the “if ….., then …..” trick is that the second part is always true. This then gives credibility to the first part. But, in fact, the first part is usually total nonsense.
Here’s an example. A new report has shown that if seas were to rise by 6.6 feet (2 metres), then that would put most of Bangkok and its 10 million residents below sea level, contrary to previous projections that showed the Thailand capital would still be mostly above sea level. The report then goes on to detail many other horrors that would come from a one metre and a two metre rise in sea levels.
Bangkok is a coastal city, like many of the world’s cities. So it is more than obvious that a large rise in sea levels would flood the city. Thus the second part of the “if ….., then …..” trick is true.
But what about the first part – if sea levels were to rise by 6.6 feet (2 metres)?
Sea levels have risen by much more than this over the last 20,000 years:
But now sea levels are only rising by around 7 cms per 100 years
So at the present rate of sea-level rise, it would take more than 2,800 years for sea levels to reach the 6.6 feet (2 metres) rise the climate catastrophists use in their “if ….., then …..” trick. Even if sea levels were rising by 10 or even 20 cms per 100 years, that would hardly be something to worry about. So, it’s nothing you or I need to worry about. In fact our children and grandchildren and many subsequent generations don’t need to worry about this either.
Moreover, in their great new report, the climate catastrophists claim: ‘Sea level rise keeps speeding up, and “many coastal areas are lower than scientists thought they were,” said Ronald Vernimmer, lead author of the new study published last week in Earth’s Future, a journal of the American Geophysical Union.’
Yet, the bible of climate catastrophists – the IPCC reports – state that there is no sign of sea-level rise accelerating:
Moreover, the new report fails to mention that the real danger to many coastal cities is that they are built on marshy ground and are sinking under their own weight. Bangkok, for example is built on swampy land and layers of soft clay and is sinking by 2 to 3 cms a year. Yet sea levels are only rising by 7 cms every 100 years. So the Thai capital will sink more in 2 to 3 years than the sea which it borders will rise in 100 years. Many other coastal cities are sinking due to water extraction.
You’ll often see climate catastrophists using the “if ….., then …..” trick.
There was a documentary titled Earth Under Water made in 2010. The description of the film explains: “Step by step, it paints a chilling picture of the world as the sea levels rise from between one and 70 meters, unravelling the science behind this cataclysm.” Yet, if sea levels are rising by just 7 cms every 100 years, it would take 1,400 years for sea levels to rise by just one metre and 98,000 years for sea levels to rise the 70 metres the film frets about. The whole film just just an extended “if ….., then …..” trick where the initial proposition of sea levels rising between one metre and 70 metres is utter and total tripe. Oh, and anyway, long before the next 98,000 years, the Earth will be heading into the next glaciation:
So sea levels will actually have fallen as more precipitation is turned to ice.
If the Earth’s temperature were to rise by 2 degrees, then Google tells us “the climate would be disrupted with fiercer storms, higher seas, animal and plant extinctions, disappearing coral, melting ice and more people dying from heat, smog and infectious disease.” But the Earth’s temperature isn’t going to rise by 2 degrees. In fact, all the climate models currently in use hugely overestimate the rate of global warming:
So, when the climate catastrophists enthusiastically supported by the mainstream media make their next grim prediction to terrify us all into cowering submission, look out for the “if ….., then …..” trick. It’s one of the climate catastrophists’ and media’s favourite ways to bamboozle an ignorant public.
I looked again at the charts I used in my Monday/Tuesday blog and had a crazy idea – I wondered if the lower a country’s energy costs, the more manufacturing jobs it will attract and the faster that country will grow. Conversely, the higher a country’s energy costs, the more jobs will be destroyed.
I know this will sound ridiculous to the worshippers of Saint Greta and Al Gore and all our net-zero-obsessed politicians, who assure us that net zero will create millions of highly-skilled, highly-paid ‘green jobs’.
We’ll start with China
Here’s China’s energy mix:
China increases its use of cheap, energy-rich coal almost every year.
And here’s China’s share of global GDP
Could there be a connection between these two charts? I wonder.
Now let’s look at India
Here’s India’s energy mix:
Just like China, India burns lots of cheap, reliable energy-rich coal.
Here’s India’s share of global GDP:
Now let’s look at the USA
Here’s the USA’s energy mix:
As you’ll see, the climate-catastrophists have managed to wreck the USA’s coal industry. Here’s the USA’s share of global GDP:
In 1960, U.S. GDP represented 40% of global GDP. Now it’s around 20% a fall of almost half in 60 years.
I realise that correlation does not imply causation, but even a politician should be able to see a pattern emerging.
Comparing electricity prices
In the UK electricity costs about $0.32 per kw/hr. In the USA it’s much lower at $0.16. But in China at $o.08 per kw/hr, electricity costs a quarter of what we pay in the UK and half the amount American homes and businesses pay. In India electricity costs even less at just $0.07 per kw/hr
I’d quite like some of our politicians to explain to us how UK companies are going to be competitive and get the UK economy growing when British companies have to pay four times as much for their energy than their competitors in China and India.
Come on Rishi! You’re meant to be a financial genius. Please enlighten us as to why it’s good for Britain that our companies are being destroyed by high energy prices largely due to useless governments like yours closing down cheap reliable coal- and gas-fired power stations and replacing them with unreliable, intermittent and ludicrously expensive wind and solar.
Having written THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS, I find it useful/amusing/worrying (delete as appropriate) to see what nonsense the climate catastrophists are churning out. So I subscribe to an e-newsletter called Inside Climate News produced by a bunch of eco-fanatics.
The latest e-newsletter had an article claiming: “New Wind and Solar Are Cheaper Than the Costs to Operate All But One Coal-Fired Power Plant in the United States”
That surprised me somewhat as countries like China and India, whose leaders aren’t worshippers of Saint Greta and the climate crazies, are ramping up coal use. Here’s a chart for China:
And here’s India:
And, in comparison, here’s the USA:
So is the USA’s energy policy being run by geniuses, like ‘climate czar’ John Kerry, who realise that coal is too expensive to be economically viable? And are China and India being run by idiots who fail to appreciate the glories of solar and wind power?
In the article claiming that all but one USA coal-fired power station are more expensive than solar and wind, the writer does mention Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act: “New analysis shows that renewables beat existing coal plants 99 percent of the time, thanks to long-term trends and an assist from the Inflation Reduction Act”.
So let’s see what this “assist from the Inflation Reduction Act” is all about. Here’s a US Treasury ‘Factsheet’ about the wonderful Inflation Reduction Act:
In it we read that: “The U.S. Department of the Treasury will be at the forefront of implementation, delivering $270 billion in tax incentives as part of the $369 billion the Inflation Reduction Act dedicates to combating climate change.”
The USA spends about $1 trillion on energy each year including transport. I did a quick ‘back-of-a-fag-packet’ calculation. If the USA’s 123 million households spend around $4,000 a year each on energy (excluding transport) then that’s about $500 billion. Yet the inflation Reduction Act is spending $369 billion subsidising supposed ‘renewables’ which are just a minor part of USA’s energy use. In fact, wind and solar make up only about 3% of USA energy use:
Yet these almost negligible energy sources are getting $369 billion in subsidies – that’s about 73% of the $500 billion US households pay for energy each year. That’s rather more significant than the seemingly modest “assist from the Inflation Reduction Act” the Inside Climate News’s writer mentions.
I have a feeling that this means $369 billion of US taxpayers’ money will be squandered on largely useless and horrifically-expensive and uneconomical solar and wind energy projects. But this massive subsidy will allow wind and solar companies to sell their power at much lower prices than the actually much cheaper fossil fuels. And then by forgetting that so much money in subsidies has been poured into the bank accounts of wind and solar companies, the climate catastrophists can claim that wind and solar are cheaper for consumers than coal.
That brings us back to the claim made by Inside Climate News that “New Wind and Solar Are Cheaper Than the Costs to Operate All But One Coal-Fired Power Plant in the United States”.
It’s total and utter bilge, nonsense, rubbish like almost all the claims churned out to a gullible public by a compliant media desperately spewing out climate-catastrophist propaganda to prepare us for the colder, darker, more miserable future our rulers have planned for us.
At the beginning of the week, I pieced together a story about the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) latest power-grab. This story was, of course, ignored by the mainstream media.
Well, now this story has been picked up by someone writing for the Daily Sceptic who, unlike me, actually knows what they’re talking about.
It may be worth reading the whole piece as its implications are actually quite frightening.
In my Monday/Tuesday blog, I tried to highlight how utterly corrupt and incompetent the WHO is. And recently we learnt that a certain highly-placed gentleman who, I believe, was highly-supportive of a campaign to vilify and ostracise anyone suggesting that the Wuhan plague accidentally leaked from a filthy, badly-run, unhygienic Chinese lab, has been appointed the WHO’s Chief Scientist. This goes from bad to worse.
So we may find that, with the next (inevitable) pandemic, it’s the WHO, and not our useless governments, which decides that lockdowns should be imposed or that nobody should be allowed on a plane, train or bus without proof of vaccination or that the bank accounts of anyone refusing vaccination should be frozen or that anyone daring to question WHO policies should be cancelled from all social media by the ludicrously-misnamed ‘fact-checkers’ for ‘spreading disinformation’ or that we all must have digital IDs showing our vaccination status.
And, looking ahead, perhaps in a few years, these digital IDs could be used to track our individual CO2 emissions and thus restrict where we can live, how we heat our homes, what we can eat and how far (if at all) we can travel?
Moreover, please remember the media hysteria bludgeoning the government into harder, faster lockdowns. I daren’t name names here for legal reasons. But, and my ageing memory may be failing me, I have a vague recollection that journalists Robert Peston and Beth Rigby were rather enthusiastic about having us incarcerated in our homes. Though, of course, I may be mistaken. I often am.
And remember the vituperation against anyone hesitant about taking the untested ‘miracle vaccines’. Britain’s highly-respected (by some people I suppose) journalist Piers Morgan, for example, was reported as writing: ‘Those who refuse to be vaccinated, with no medical reason not to, should be refused NHS care if they then catch covid. I’m hearing of anti-vaxxers using up ICU beds in London at vast expense to the taxpayer. Let them pay for their own stupidity & selfishness.”
Can you imagine how much more the (IMHO) mostly prostitutes-for-sale journalists and politicians will harangue and browbeat us when they can claim they are following the science as determined by the incorruptible (ha-ha-ha), highly-competent (you must be joking), highly-respected (really?) supposed ‘experts’ at the WHO?
Our elected rulers have handed over our immigration policy to the United Nations Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration, our economic policy to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) who couldn’t forecast the date of Christmas never mind the likely development of a complex economy in turbulent times and now they’re going to surrender our health policy to the WHO – yet another bunch of globalist, incompetent, corrupt, self-serving bureaucrats.
A whole new one-world-government, globalist world is coming and I for one don’t like what I see.
Here’s a great (and quite short – 12 minutes) video by Dr John Campbell.
(And yes, before you all start throwing rocks at me, I do realise that he is doctor of nursing and not a fully qualified medic. However he has written several textbooks, has taught in many countries, is extremely knowledgeable and has consistently produced excellent quality, highly-informative videos throughout the pandemic)
In it he explains how the risk/benefits of the ‘miracle’ vaccines has changed since the more infectious but much less pathogenic Omicron variant of the Sino/American lab-leaked plague became the dominant variant. The figures were apparently presented to the Joint Committee on Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI) in October 2022 and Dr Campbell expresses his incredulity that the JCVI hasn’t changed its advice about the mRNA vaccines.
I suspect the JCVI and health bureaucrats and politicians have painted themselves into a corner with their two years of propaganda about the vaccines being ‘safe’ and ‘effective’. So they can’t now admit that certain groups shouldn’t get the ‘miracle’ boosters. If they did admit this, then they would also be admitting that their vaccines aren’t ‘safe’ and aren’t ‘effective’. So our rulers continue with their now discredited narrative about the supposed (but non-existent for most people) benefits of their vaccines.
Here’s Dr Campbell:
What about the great Climate Change lie?
That brings us to the other great lie being propagandised against us – the lie that human activities, rather than natural cycles, are causing the Earth’s climate to warm with potentially catastrophic consequences for humanity. This is, of course, complete nonsense. I try to show this in my book THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS. And people like Tony Heller on his realclimatescience.com, Paul Homewood on notalotofpeopleknowthat blog and the wattsupwiththat.com website continually expose how every claim made by the climate catastrophists is belied by the evidence.
But once again, our rulers have painted themselves into a corner with their 30-40 years of climate doom-mongering. So, even as ever more evidence mounts proving that man-made climate change is the greatest scientific and economic blunder in human history, our rulers are trapped by their own lies and will destroy our economies and our lifestyles to achieve their economically-suicidal ‘net zero’.
I know its a cliché, but John Maynard Keynes famously said:
Unfortunately for us, even when the facts change, our rulers and bureaucrats and all their money- and power-grabbing cronies continue with their erroneous policies as they’re afraid of admitting that they can have made a mistake. And we’re the ones who suffer.
We’ve seen how UK governments have handed over control of our borders to the utterly corrupt United Nations in 2018 by signing the Marrakesh “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration”. And now it looks like our government is about to do the same for many parts of our lives by handing decision-making to the possibly even more corrupt, ludicrously misnamed World Health Organisation.
The next pandemic
We now know that there will be another pandemic. Firstly, because governments around the world will have seen how easy it is to create biological weapons by doing gain of function research on existing viruses making them more infectious and more pathogenic. So we can be sure that many governments, some of who will not be our friends, have started their own gain of function research to develop new biological weapons. And we can be sure that some of this work will be carried out in labs that are about as biologically secure as your average Indian take-away. So there will be leaks as happened in Wuhan.
Moreover, hopefully you know about the Project Veritas sting in which a Pfizer researcher seems to be showing off to a female companion about Pfizer also intends to do gain of function research in order to pre-emptively develop new profitable vaccines.
Here’s part of the Pfizer employee’s revelations:
One of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it ourselves so we could create – preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine – no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses.
Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.
You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bulls**t.
From what I’ve heard is they are optimising it, but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious – obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations
So, if the main vaccine producers are also diving into gain of function research creating more infectious and more dangerous viruses, that’s another potential source of lab leaks.
The World Health Organisation’s coming power-grab?
That brings us to the ludicrously misnamed World Health Organisation (WHO).
In order to strengthen global pandemic governance, the WHO is working on a new international legal instrument that specifically governs pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. This is planned to be ready for final approval by member countries in May 2024. Basically, countries will hand over much of the decision-making about how they respond to the next pandemic to the unelected bureaucrats at the WHO.
This could cover things like lockdowns, international travel restrictions, how many (probably fake and dangerous) vaccines you will be forced to take and so on.
How corrupt is the WHO?
As our useless governments are about to abdicate control of our lives to the venal and incompetent WHO elites, let’s just briefly remind ourselves of how corrupt and incompetent our WHO overlords are:
We now know that China locked down all domestic traffic internally by end January 2020 but pushed to open foreign travel till end March. Data from Tom Tom traffic index, a traffic location site that covers 416 cities across 57 countries show that as a result of this strategy, China, was able to lockdown its cities unknown to the world. While this reduced the spread of the Corona virus within China, China’s aggressive foreign travel policy lead to a virus explosion worldwide.
The COVID- 19 virus first surfaced in Wuhan in the last week of December. On 31 December 2019 Chinese health officials first reported to WHO that 41 patients in Wuhan had contracted a mysterious pneumonia that was not responding to conventional treatment. On 20th of January Zong Nanshan the scientist named by China to lead the battle against the virus stated ” Now we can say that it is certain that it is a human to human transmission phenomenon”.
On January 22 at a meeting to decide the measures to be taken, WHO was not able warn the world of the severity of COVID-19 apparently because of resistance from Beijing. (WHO referred to it as “divergent views”). Moreover, the WHO claimed (under pressure from China) that there was no human to human transmission.
On the 31st January Italy fearing a major outbreak of Coronavirus from hundreds of tourists arriving from China closed all flights to and from China. In spite of China closing down its own domestic travel to prevent the virus spreading, China’s vice-minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang met Italy’s ambassador to China Luca Ferrari in Beijing following the flight ban and the Chinese foreign ministry stated: “Italy’s decision to stop flights without contacting China in advance caused great inconvenience to citizens of both countries. Many Chinese are still stranded in Italy.”
The U.S. issued a travel advisory against China travel on the 2nd of February but did not ban all services. While Chinese authorities limited domestic flights from Wuhan to other Chinese cities like Beijing and Shanghai in an effort to contain the outbreak in January, it urged international carriers to maintain their flying schedules.
China’s assertion that all was well for international travel was supported by the WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus at the opening of the agency’s Executive Board meet on the 3rd February. He said ”There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade. We call on all countries to implement decisions that are evidence-based and consistent. WHO stands ready to provide advice to any country that is considering which measures to take”.
With the Chinese domestic travel lockdown, the average traffic density fell to below 10% in Wuhan and Shanghai during February and below 5% in Beijing. Buy while implementing a total domestic lockdown in February, China kept assuring the world that the situation was not serious and fully under control.
On the 11th of March WHO belatedly declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. By that time the number of cases globally had grown thirteen fold. As per WHO website more than 118,000 cases had been reported in 114 countries, and 4,291 people had lost their lives when the global pandemic was declared. That is when the rest of the world started preparing for a suitable response to the pandemic, nearly two months after China.
I rest my case as to why the UK government shouldn’t sign whatever dreadful, power-grabbing treaty the cess-pit of corruption and incompetence that is the WHO comes up with.
The Wuhan song
And here to cheer us all up is a video I made at the start of the Chinese lab-leaked plague:
Here’s little story you’re unlikely to see covered in much detail by the UK-loathing BBC, C4 News or any other mainstream media.
The road from Marrakesh
You might remember that in 2018 the UK signed up to The Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration – an intergovernmentally negotiated agreement, prepared under the auspices of the United Nations that describes itself as covering “all dimensions of international migration in a holistic and comprehensive manner”.[3]
Well it’s rather lucky that we so willingly handed over control of our borders to the utterly corrupt and useless United Nations because there are an awful lot of people in the world who would rather like to live somewhere else than the countries where they were born.
Galluping to the great replacement?
Apparently the polling organisation Gallup does an annual survey covering interviews with nearly 127,000 adults in 122 countries asking whether they would rather like to migrate somewhere else. Gallup say that round 16% of adults worldwide — which projects to almost 900 million people — said they would like to leave their own country permanently, if they could:
The chart above shows the percentage of adults who want to migrate from each region of the world and how this has changed from 2011 to 2021.
(to see the charts clearly, left-click on them, then left-click again)
I suspect the real figure would be higher. But just to make the maths easier, let’s assume that about a billion people want to leave their homes countries.
Where do they want to go?
The next chart shows the desired destinations for these one billion or so would-be migrants and how this has changed from 2011 to 2021:
Perhaps surprisingly, the number wanting to come to the UK has fallen from 7% to 4%. But 4% of a billion people is around 40 million. Moreover, we have to be careful as many of those wanting to go to Italy and Germany may have the UK as their ultimate goal.
Oddly, not many of these good people fancy ending up in Saudi Arabia.
The world’s worst cess-pits?
Gallup also singled out the countries from which more than half the adult population would like to escape:
Prepare for the invasion
Of course, not all the 40 million who want to come to Britain will make it. But given our rulers’ refusal to protect our borders, an awful lot will. We’ve already seen how the number of wonderful diverse multi-cultural enrichers being ferried in comfort and safety across the Channel by Border Farce and the worthless RNLI has doubled every year:
And in 2023 may well hit more than 80,000. But that’s just a tiny proportion of the 40 million who want to come to Britain:
So, if you’ve got a couple of spare rooms in your home, our globalist UK-hating governments will probably start requisitioning them to house the incoming hordes. After all, our rulers will probably claim that all these uneducated, unemployable, deeply-criminal, military-age, rape-obsessed men are supposed ‘climate refugees’. And as we greedy westerners are supposedly responsible for the supposed ‘Climate Crisis’, then it’s our responsibility to house the incoming tsunami of illegal migrants.
Or else the government will start imposing taxes on people the government considers are living in homes that are larger than they need in order to force these greedy, space-hogging people to downsize to make more room for the invading Third-world locust swarm.
You think this won’t happen? I admire your optimism.
Open-borders Britain vs closed-borders Japan
Here’s a short video by Paul Joseph Watson extolling the benefits of living in vibrant, multi-cultural, crime-ridden, collapsing, open-borders, overcrowded, migrant-hugging, increasingly woke Britain compared with the stability and low-crime cities of closed-borders rather more conservative Japan:
David Craig, on February 20th, 2023
