When looking back to see which figure in the past correctly predicted how today’s Britain would look, most people probably think of George Orwell and his two groundbreaking books – “1984” and “Animal Farm”. But there’s another rather splendid chap who foresaw how British society would develop – none other than Adolf ‘One Testicle’ Hitler’s sidekick and propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels.
There are two Goebbels quotes which, I believe, encapsulate some important aspects of today’s Britain.
The first and probably best known is:
After all, here are just a few of the biggest lies we’re fed and fed and fed and fed with:
For more than 30 years we’ve been told that CO2 is a poison which will lead to global boiling and extinction of the human race. Of course, it was always nonsense aimed at subjugating us to control by international organisations such as the UN, the WHO, the WEF, the IPCC and suchlike
‘Diversity is our Strength’ – another oft-repeated pile of BS. We can all see that diversity wrecks social cohesion, leads to more crime and violence and fractures a country destroying shared values and beliefs. Meanwhile, in organisations the drive towards diversity has led to the hiring of employees who are often incompetent, out of their depth and who come from some of the world’s most corrupt and backwards cultures
The West needs immigration to compensate for a declining birthrate – I hardly need to waste your time trying to explain why mass, open-borders immigration has been a catastrophe for the West
Here’s the other one:
We can see this all the time as our rulers constantly blame their opponents for the very things they themselves are doing. We seem to be in a time where everything is the opposite of what our rulers and hordes of activists claim:
Antifa – who actually are fascists determined to crush free speech – keep accusing people like Reform’s Nigel Farage and ordinary patriotic Brits of being fascists. And, of course, whenever a Labour politician gives a speech in front of a couple of Union Jacks, that ‘proves’ they are patriotis. Whenever a normal person displays a Union Jack, that ‘proves’ they are racists and fascists
A few days ago, our great Leader, the (IMHO) recidivist liar lying Keir ‘Liar’ Starmer said: “I think the political divide now is between what I call patriotic national renewal, which is what this Labour Government is doing, bringing people together – whether it’s partnership working here or across the country, finding those points of unity – or the toxic division of Reform and others on the Right.” Keir, old chap, the person tearing our country apart is you with your policies such as two-tier policing, two-tier ‘justice’, mass open-borders immigration and using your lawyer chums to put the welfare of largely uneducated, largely unemployable, often criminal, often deeply misogynist illegal migrants above the rights of taxpaying British citizens
And then we have the climate catastrophists accusing any people daring to question their Davidian end-of-the-world cult as ‘science deniers’. The only people denying science are the climate catastrophists with their seemingly endless string of predictions which never actually happen.
I could go on. But I think you get the picture.
Apart from the fact that, due to the bravery and sacrifice of previous generations, we don’t speak German here, old Joseph Goebbels would probably have felt very much at home in today’s Britain.
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if President Trump sued the putrid, left-wing propaganda machine BBC into the ground. Sadly that won’t happen as the time for making a defamation claim has passed. And anyway, the BBC will no doubt issue some kind of bureaucratise semi-apology, which isn’t really and apology at all. Meanwhile the BBC-adoring ruling elites will ram down our throats time and time again that the BBC is not ‘institutionally biased’. Moreover, we’ll have (IMHO) BBC gravy-train riders like Nick ‘Red Robbo’ Robinson claiming that when the BBC is caught with its corporate pants well down around its ankles, this is all part of a right-wing plot to bring down the BBC.
There are plenty of over-paid, over-pensioned talking heads appearing in the media giving their well-remunerated opinions about how wonderful ‘our’ BBC is. So, instead of just adding to the cacophony of garbage being spouted, I’d like to give a bit of context about the BBC’s long long history of lying to us. There are at least 3 books by former BBC insiders, exposing the cultural rot and deep-rooted bias which pervades the whole of ‘our’ BBC.
Amazon tells us: To some, it is the voice of the nation, yet to others it has never been clearer that the BBC is in the grip of an ideology that prevents it reporting fairly on the world. Many have been scandalised by its pessimism on Brexit and its one-sided presentation of the Trump presidency, whilst simultaneously amused by its outrage over ‘fake news’. This punchy polemic galvanises the debate over how our licence-fee money is spent, and asks whether the BBC is a fair arbiter of the news, or whether it is a conduit for pervasive and institutional liberal left-wing bias.
Amazon tells us: The people of Britain are under attack. We are being brainwashed. We are being brainwashed completely, ceaselessly and cynically… So just who is doing the brainwashing? How are they doing it and for what purposes? David Sedgwick’s latest book takes the reader on a disturbing journey deep into the realms of mistruth and deception to reveal, for the very first time, the many tricks and subterfuges used by the British Broadcasting Corporation. Every time we engage with BBC content, the author argues, we are exposing ourselves to a very dark art: the art of brainwashing. Wilful, deceitful and incessant, Orwellian parallels define the modern corporation and should chill the soul of all who cherish freedom and liberty. Mind control is here. This is not fiction. BBC: Brainwashing Britain? is a shocking expose of mass propaganda, its components, and aims. You may never look at Auntie in the same way ever again.
Amazon tells us: What exactly is the purpose of the BBC nowadays—to entertain, educate and inform? But is that all? The broadcaster itself claims to be a fearless and independent provider of news tasked with “speaking truth to power”—a true champion of the underdog.
However, as David Sedgwick reveals in his new book, the reality is somewhat different: not only does the BBC diligently protect power from scrutiny, it attacks and attempts to discredit those who dare to challenge the status quo. Using multiple examples of BBC reporting, the author argues that the tax-payer funded broadcaster is a proxy which acts on behalf of a tiny but very powerful clique—a role which compels it to pump out disinformation on an industrial scale, misleading all those who consume its content
So, in answer to the question: Is the BBC institutionally biased? I think the above 3 books give you the answer.
And so, despite all its bleatings about being a credible news source with its laughably dishonest ‘BBC Verify’, the BBC will continue to pump out its nonsense:
Britain is racist
The EU is wonderful
The British empire never brought civilisation to the world’s worst hell-holes
All the most important scientific advances originally came from sub-Saharan Africa
Immigration is good for us
Diversity is our strength
We’ll all die by 2020 due to ‘global boiling’
Greta is a modern-day saint
Israel is evil, Hamas are freedom-loving pacifists
Any form of learning – maths, physics, chemistry, musical notation etc etc is racist
The Religion of Peace is a really really peaceful religion
Men in frocks with penises and a pair of testicles are women
The Chinese lab-leaked plague didn’t leak from a filthy Chinese lab
Keir Starmer is a titan of international politics and deserves the Nobel Peace Prize
Conservatives are bad, Labour are good
Nigel Farage and Reform are a threat to democracy
Most of the illegal migrants arriving in small boats are women and children
As our UK-hating, WEF- and UN-adoring, hypocritical, worthless, lying scum rulers line up to lay their taxpayer-funded wreaths and profess their (fake) patriotism, one person, a World War Two veteran, said probably the most truthful and important four words that anyone in Britain will say this year. When asked about the sacrifices he and others made in the war, he replied that, given the state of our country, “it wasn’t worth it”.
You’ll all be aware of some recent kerfuffle in Birmingham whereby local authorities and supposed ‘community leaders’ decided that certain people from a certain country and religion were not welcome in the city on the occasion of a football-kicking game.
Google helpfully informs us that: “Birmingham is a “super-diverse” city, with the majority of its population belonging to Black, Asian, and other minority ethnic groups.”
According to the 2021 Census, 51.4% of the population is from a Black, Asian, or other minority ethnic group, compared to 48.6% who are White. The largest single ethnic group outside of White British is Pakistani, followed by Black African and Indian. It is likely that, since the 2021 Census, the proportion of White British has fallen and the proportion of Asians has risen.
Here is a breakdown of the ethnicity in Birmingham based on the 2021 Census:
Total population: 1,143,870
White: 48.6% – 556,608
Asian: 31.0% – 355,384
Black: 11.0% – 125,760
Mixed: 4.8% – 55,205
Other: 4.5% – 51,965
But I heard somewhere that over 50% of Birmingham’s population of under-30s are now ‘Asian’.
Here’s is a list of Birmingham’s MPs: Preet Gill, Tahir Ali, Shabana Mahmood, Ayoub Khan, Jess Phillips, Paulette Hamilton, Liam Byrne, Laurence Turner, Al Carns.
First comes Saturday, then comes Sunday
That brings us to the phrase: “first comes Saturday then comes Sunday”. Google tells us: ‘The phrase “first comes Saturday then comes Sunday” (Arabic: min sallaf es-sabt lāqā el-ḥadd qiddāmūh), is a Middle Eastern proverb meaning that one event inevitably follows another. It is often used in a threatening or fearful context to imply that persecution of one minority group (Jews, represented by their holy day – Saturday) will be followed by persecution of another (Christians, represented by their holy day – Sunday).’
Wikipedia explains: “Recent uses of the proverb have been attributed to Arab Christians expressing a fear that they might soon be ostracized on a scale akin to that which was seen during the Jewish exodus from Muslim-majority countries. It is often reported to be used by Muslim fundamentalists as a slogan to intimidate local Christian communities”.
According to a publication by the American Foreign Policy Council, the proverb in the form “After Saturday, Sunday”, was brandished as a popular slogan among supporters of Haj Amin al-Husseini‘s faction during the 1936–39 Arab revolt in Palestine. The message is reported to have meant that once the Jews had been driven out, the Christians would be expelled.
In my weekend blog, I mentioned a book by Lebanon-born writer Brigitte Gabriel:
In her book, Brigitte Gabriel describes the complete disaster which befell Lebanon – once one of the most successful and ‘diverse’ countries in the blighted Middle East. One group apparently decided that life was much too complicated with people from so many different cultures and religions living peacefully alongside each other. So this group nobly decided to simplify things by murdering anyone who didn’t belong to their tribe. This turned the once thriving Lebanon into yet another corrupt, bankrupt, poverty-stricken, excrement-covered, Third-world, failed-state hell-hole.
As the British shrug their shoulders at the fact that Birmingham is becoming a no-go zone for Jews, some people, looking at what has happened in far too many other countries (like Lebanon?), might start to worry that in Britain too, we may soon experience “first comes Saturday, then comes Sunday”.
As for Birmingham
Is Birmingham part of Britain now? I couldn’t possibly comment
Will Birmingham still be part of Britain in 20 years? I definitely couldn’t possibly comment
I don’t know if anyone reads books anymore. I know I read many fewer than I used to as there is already so much current affairs information on the Internet on sites like The Daily Sceptic,Not a lot of people know that and like History Debunked and Heretics on YouTube.
When choosing books which seem to describe the collapse of the West, and especially Britain, most people probably think of George Orwell’s “1984” and “ANIMAL FARM”.
I’d like to propose two books which I feel give a glimpse into our future.
First is “BECAUSE THEY HATE” by Brigitte Gabriel.
Amazon tells us:
A New York Times bestseller, “Because They Hate” is a political wake-up call told through a very personal memoir frame. Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood to militant Islam. In 1975, she was ten years old and living in Southern Lebanon when militant Muslims from throughout the Middle East poured into her country and declared jihad against the Lebanese Christians. “Because They Hate” warns that the U.S. is threatened by fundamentalist Islamic theology in the same way Lebanon was – radical Islam will stop at nothing short of domination of all non-Muslim countries. Gabriel saw this mission start in Lebanon, and she refuses to stand by silently while it happens in America. Gabriel sees in the West a lack of understanding and a blatant ignorance of the ways and thinking of the Middle East. She also points out mistakes the West has made in consistently underestimating the single-mindedness with which fundamentalist Islam has pursued its goals over the past thirty years.Fiercely articulate and passionately committed, “Because They Hate” tells Gabriel’s personal story as well as outlines the history, social movements, and religious divisions that have led to this critical historical conflict.
The second book is “FUGUE FOR A DARKENING ISLAND” by Christopher Priest
Amazon tells us:
As Europe looks for ways to deal with the humanitarian crisis of Syria’s misplaced population and the influx of refugees crossing the Mediterranean Christopher Priest’s second novel has a new, timely, edge.
Survivors of a terrible African war flee their blighted continent, and look for refuge in the countries of the West. But Britain is falling into civil war and anarchy.
One of Christopher Priest’s earliest novels, FUGUE FOR A DARKENING ISLAND is a powerful work whose subject matter has become increasingly relevant in recent years.
I thought it might be worth just taking a minute or so to highlight something nobody else seems to have noticed.
Our (IMHO) lying, devious, WEF empty-suit, UK-loathing, free-speech-crushing miserable excuse for a Prime MInister has stated that he will accelerate moving illegal Third-world invaders out of hotels. There are many problems with this, for example this means that tens of thousands of men, many of whom are uneducated, unemployable, deeply misogynistic and often criminal will be dispersed to a street near you.
But a second problem is that many of the agreements the useless Home Office has made with hotels are for up to five years. So, even if all the illegal migrants are moved out of these hotels, we taxpayers will still have to pay the hotel owners for years to come. So we’ll be paying twice for the accommodation of tens of thousands of illegal migrants – once for the rented homes they’re moved to and a second time for the hotel rooms they are no longer using.
We are so generous as we become the laughing stock of the world.
So, some ‘great’ news from New York. A rabid socialist from our absolute favouritest religion has been elected mayor. What can we expect?
massive tax increases for anyone who tries to work for a living
an explosion in violent crime
streets submerged in filth and garbage
endless strikes by public-sector workers
a tsunami of drugs flooding into the city
an exodus of anyone able to escape the dystopian hell that awaits the city
I noticed the admirable results of about ten years of the (IMHO) ghastly narcissist Trudeau in Canada. In 10 years Canada’s richest province has gone from being comparable to the top 10 US states to being poorer per capita than the poorest US state. That’s what Trudeau, Carney and Net Zero have achieved.
We’ve seen the same scenario play out in California under the hopeless Gavin ‘renewable energy’ Newsom:
taxes up
energy costs up
drug use up
poverty up
homelessness up
crime up
misery up
And, of course, a mass exodus of the wealth producers.
Why do people never learn?
Maybe it’ll soon be time for a remake of the film “Escape from New York”? The title could be “Escape from New York 2027”
I don’t know if it has happened yet. But I suspect that once a few months have passed after the train stabbings attack, someone in government (probably Darren “they’re mostly women and children” Jones) will claim that the train stabbings attack “prove” that we need digital IDs.
Starmer has already assured us that the introduction of digital IDs will somehow miraculously stop the invading Third-world’s ‘finest’ from boarding small boats to cross the Channel to live off benefits and crime while getting their ‘entertainment’ from raping of underage white girls. And soon in Stasi Starmer’s Britain, twinned with North Korea, the plan is no doubt that we will need to show our digital IDs to do any activity such as leaving our homes, going to the cinema, going shopping, going on holiday and, of course, buying train tickets.
One reason Starmer is so dangerous is that he looks and talks like an ineffectual, empty-suit bureaucrat:
But beware this man is determined to destroy our country and your life:
So, we learn that the suspect in the train stabbings was “British born”. Did I mention that he was “British born”? Anyway this “British born” suspect who was born in Britain and thus is “British born” has been arrested. And the police were uncharacteristically quick in informing us that this “British born” suspect was “born in Britain”.
But why does every news report repeat and repeat and repeat that the suspect was “British born”? A cynic might be tempted to suspect that repeatedly stressing that the “British born” suspect was born in Britain is a distraction technique to try and prevent people from concluding that the attack could have been motivated by some kind of extremist ideology or religion.
But hold on a minute. Wasn’t one of Britain’s worst terrorist attacks carried out by a cherubic, British born “Welsh choir boy”?
Though I heard one ‘reporter’ suggesting that, just like the train stabbings, the Southport murders were not motivated by any religious beliefs. Um, perhaps that reporter ‘forgot’ about the various documents which were found in the cherubic British born Welsh choirboy’s bedroom?
Anyway, some cynics probably won’t be surprised when our rulers declare that the train stabbings were due to “mental ‘elf ishoos” and absolutely nothing to do with any rather dodgy beliefs. After all, the suspect was “British born”!
Sorry, I was a bit late. The “mental ‘elf ishoos” explanation/excuse has already been pushed out in all the mainstream media. So nothing to worry about. And we’ll get the usual:
horrifying events
our thoughts and prayers blah blah
praise for the emergency services blah blah
isolated incident
nothing to see here
shut up plebs or the plods will be coming for you
Britain’s drift towards civil war?
There was a (IMHO) brilliant article on the Daily Sceptic a couple of days ago (link below). For me, the most significant lines in the article were:
According to a 2023 UnHerd–Focaldata poll, 32% of Britons agree that the ‘Great Replacement’ is real. In recent years, official reviews of the Prevent programme and the Commission for Countering Extremism have identified the idea as an “extremist” and “hateful” narrative. Rather than ask why so many believe it, the emphasis falls instead on policing the discourse. Once again, policy yields to narrative control – suppressing arguments and evidence that make the state uneasy. Effort is directed to the administrative management of disbelief: to discipline perception rather than address reality.
After all, following each “absolutely nothing to do with terrorism” attack, many more people are arrested for commenting on the attack than on actually participating in the attack.
So, after the train stabbing attack, we’re being told (warned?) that “it would be inappropriate to speculate” on the motives for the stabbing attack.
I think we all know what that means. I suspect that, had the attacker(s) been overweight, shaven-headed white men with St George’s Cross and “I luv mum” tattoos screaming something like “long live Tommy Robinson”, our rulers/oppressors would have released ensured the BBC and other mainstream media broadcast that information pretty damn quickly. But none of the mainstream media reports seem overly keen to give us any information about the attackers’ colour or ethnicity or stuff like that in spite of the fact that there were an awful lot of eye-witnesses.
How curious. Not.
However, I don’t want to be “Lucy-Connollied”. You might be tempted to speculate. But I won’t dare because I know what happens to people who tell truths which are uncomfortable to the UK-hating, self-serving, lying, globalist elites.
And anyway, once information is released, no doubt we’ll be told that the attacker(s) were suffering from “mental health” problems and that ………… sorry. I’d better stop myself here for obvious reasons as I was about to mention ………………..
David Craig, on November 13th, 2025
