I thought that by writing about Transgenderism, Izlumophobia and Man-Made Global Warming yesterday, I had dealt with the three areas of biggest bollox being forced on us by our virtue-signalling, West-hating, politically-correct ruling elites. How wrong I was. I forgot about supposed racial discrimination.
As you probably know, yesterday the UK government has published what was billed as “one of the world’s most extensive audits of racial disparity”. When she announced the audit, back in August, the prime minister promised it would make for “difficult reading”.
Of course, as soon as the report was published, the usual self-aggrandising, holier-than-thou, preachy c*nts were all over our TV claiming that the report showed that Britain was “institutionally racist” and as usual demanded more laws to control what we plebs did and thought. But then something amazing happened. One day later, the report seems to have disappeared almost without trace. Imagine that – a report supposedly proving Britain was “institutionally racist” not being mentioned on most media less than 24 hours after the results were known.
How could this happen?
It happened because, in reality, the report shows that the opposite is true – not only is Britain NOT institutionally racist, but certain immigrant groups actually perform much better than white ethnic British. Ooops. That’s not what the libtards, desperate to create more ‘victim groups’ and a ‘grievance culture’ wanted.
Let’s just look at a few of the findings
At key stage two, the second stage of primary school, 71 per cent of Chinese primary school pupils meet expected standard in reading, writing, and maths, compared with 54 per cent of White British pupils and 13 per cent of White Gypsy and Roma pupils
Indian people were the most likely of any group to work in highly skilled occupations: one in ten were in manager, director or senior official roles and over three in ten were professionals
Chinese pupils were the most likely to go to university. Indian pupils made better progress than Pakistani children, and white British pupils made less progress than average
White offenders received the shortest average jail terms at 18 months, compared with 24 and 25 months for black and Asian offenders respectively. However, the conviction rate was highest among white defendants
White youngsters were four times more likely to smoke than black youths
Pakistani women are “shockingly badly integrated” into British society
White British pupils on free school meals perform the worst at key stage two with just 32 per cent reaching the expected level
Black Caribbean pupils are being permanently excluded from school three times as often as White British pupils
Indian and Pakistani people have similar rates of home ownership to white people in Britain, but black people and those from Pakistan and Bangladesh were less likely to own their own property
It’s about culture, not discrimination
From what I can see, the high performance of different ethnic groups has everything to do with culture and nothing to do with discrimination:
The best performing groups in British society are Hindus, Sikhs and Chinese because of the value they put on family stability, education and work
The worst performing groups Roma and gypsies for reasons I believe should be more than obvious – truancy from school, widespread criminality etc etc
Another low-performing group are many Black Carribbean and ethnic white males who fail to do well in society because they often come from broken families where work and education are less encouraged and where there may be several generations who have never got any qualifications and have never worked
The failure of Pakistani and Bangladeshi women is quite clearly due to a culture which encourages them to dress like Darth Vader on a bad hair day and discourages them from educational achievement, work and from integrating into society. Moreover, many of them will be illiterate and uneducated imported for a first-cousin marriage and be unable to speak any English
The report claims to try to understand why there are differences in the performance of different ethnic groups. But actually the report dishonestly hides the reasons for differences by including the highest-performing groups – Hindus, Sikhs, Chinese – with one of the lowest performing groups – our friends from the Religion of Peace – together under the catch-all title of “Asians”.
However, as usual this lack of evidence had not prevented the usual sh*theads from screaming “waaacciiissssmmmn” and “discrimination” probably even before they had read the report.
Theresa May is supposed to have said “this audit means that for society as a whole – for government, for our public services – there is nowhere to hide”. But the opposite is true – the ruling elites are trying to use the report to prove there is discrimination where there is none and as an excuse to oppress us with ever more unnecessary thought-control laws when the report actually proves that culture rather than supposed discrimination explains disparities between different groups.
So, in the category of total politically-correct bollox, in addition to Transgenderism, Izlumophobia and Man-Made Global Warming which I wrote about yesterday, I’d like to add racial discrimination.
There are at least three great new ‘truths’ we’re all expected to believe in:
Transgenderism
Izlumophobia
Man-Made Global Warming
But the question I’d like to pose today is – which of these three is the biggest load of total and utter bollox?
Let’s start with the latest of these ludicrous fads being foisted on us by the virtue-signalling, politically-correct libtard numbskulls:
Transgenderism
To quote some self-absorbed lefty on the BBC news the other day, “Many people don’t identify with the gender they’re assigned at birth”. What does this ‘expert’ mean by “many people”? About 20%? Or 30%? Or even 40%? Actually, I believe the most-quoted figure is about 0.01% and of this 0.01%, probably 95% of them are psychologically-disturbed and their supposed gender confusion is just their way of expressing their mental problems.
As far as I can see, transgenderism is just madness driven by a tiny clique, mainly on the Left, who want as many real and imaginary ‘victim’ groups as possible to fit their narrative that only more state intervention in every aspect of our lives can protect the supposed ‘vulnerable’.
I had always thought that, apart from a very few hermaphrodites, if you’re born with a penis you’re male and with a vagina you’re female. And no amount of wishful thinking by the libtards can change this.
Yet now we hear that the UK census is making the question about whether respondents are male or female voluntary in order to not offend those who can’t make up their minds about their sex or who are too fat to be able to see what sex they are.
This is dictatorship by the minority.
Izlumophobia
After every Jihadi terror massacre, we’re told that there have been many supposedly “Izlumophobic” revenge attacks. The latest figures suggest that over 150,000 innocents have been killed and another 200,000 injured in over 30,000 Izlumic attacks in the 16 years since the September 11th 2001 atrocities. In the same period, just one person has died (of a heart attack) during an Izlumophobic attack on Moozerlums.
Moreover, a phobia is an irrational fear of something. Yet even the British Government admits that there are about 23,000 radical Izlumists in Britain. Moreover, our Jihadi friends keep telling us they want to kill us and to show that they mean what they say, they have slaughtered over 150,000 innocents in about 50 countries in the name of their religion. These 150,000 corpses might suggest to some people that it’s not wholly irrational to be afraid of the Religion of Peace and Happiness.
Man-Made Global Warming
Here it’s difficult to know where to start to debunk this rubbish. But let’s try anyway:
John P Holdren (Obama’s special adviser on Global Warming) first became known in the 1970s when he, and a large number of other supposed climate scientists, claimed we were heading into a new Ice Age in which millions would starve due to crop failures in the Northern Hemisphere. He was wrong then and is wrong now
We now know that the famous hockey-stick diagrams were based on fiddled data. Likewise, the claim that “97% of scientists” believe Man-Made Global Warming is happening is based (as I have explained in a previous blog) on fraudulently-manipulated figures
The level of Arctic Ice is decreasing. But 2015 and 2016 were record levels for the amount of ice in the Antarctic. In fact, there was so much ice in the Antarctic that a ship full of Greenies trying to prove the ice was decreasing got stuck in the ice and then the ship sent to rescue them also got stuck. It’s true that the 2016 ice level is at a record low. But a decline from the record highs of 2014 and 2015 to the record low of 2016 cannot be explained by a Global Warming trend
We all know the climate is changing and has always changed. But it’s more than unlikely that human activity is to blame given that we’ve only had an advanced, industrialised society for about 100 years when our climate has been changing for the last 4,500 years:
And finally, if human activity is to blame for Global Warming, why do the Greenies not demand improved birth control in the rapidly increasing populations of the Third World? Because that would be politically incorrect?
It’s all about controlling our lives
Despite all the screaming and howling from the politically correct about Transgenderism, Izlumophobia and Global Warming, it’s probable that many who are shouting the loudest don’t actually believe in these three new ‘truths’ either. What they’re constantly trying to do is create ever more new supposed ‘victim’ groups in order to justify us giving them control over ever more aspects of our lives.
And once people have got tired of Transgenderism, Izlumophobia and Global Warming, the lefty libtard control freaks will have invented many more new ‘truths’ to bludgeon us into accepting their mantras and their new laws as we move further down the road of thought control and dictatorship by the minority.
As part of our mission at snouts-in-the-trough to educate and inform our readers about the delights of other cultures, today we’d like to bring you the heartwarming story of Mr Ameerul Islam.
Mr Islam has apparently just been arrested for the rape, murder and genital mutilation of a young Indian Dalit (untouchable) girl.
But this is apparently not the first time Mr Islam has interfered with a female. Apparently on a previous occasion he had non-consensual sex with a female goat and then stabbed and mutilated the goat’s genitals so badly that the poor animal had to be taken to a veterinary hospital. Luckily the goat was not killed during Mr Islam’s sex attack. But that was possibly because the goat, unlike the girl raped, mutilated and murdered by Mr Islam, could hardly testify against him in any court proceedings were he ever arrested.
Now, there are some stupid, bigoted people who believe that people from certain religions (or a certain religion) are more likely to sexually abuse animals and females than people from other religions. This may or may not be true. Who knows? But I have no idea what religion Mr Ameerul Islam might belong to. Nor do I have any information that would help me guess what religion Mr Ameerul Islam might belong to. Nope, I’ve given it a lot of thought but have drawn a complete blank. Silly me!
However, I’m sure most of my readers are much more intelligent than me, and therefore might be able to have a stab at Mr Ameerul Islam’s religious adherence?
Meet Amirul Islam. He first had sex with a goat, then raped and murdered a Dalit girl in Kerala, India. pic.twitter.com/xDT4Bassjt
Oh, and while we’re on the subject of goatbusting, here’s a short video of some men indulging in what could either be a little foreplay with objects of their affection or else the prelude to the joys of a Halal slaughter. The men seem to be enjoying themselves. The animals don’t seem to be having too much fun:
(weekend blog) Here are two beautiful, intelligent and talented young French girls – cousins killed by the open borders and *sl*mophiliac policies of French Presidents Hollande and Macron and their boss Angela “Hitler” Merkel:
One of these girls was studying to become a doctor, the other a nurse. They had their throats slit outside a railway station in Marseilles on Sunday 1st October by an illegal immigrant from North Africa who shouldn’t even have been in France and who had been arrested and let go several times by the useless French police. Moreover, even though the man was an illegal immigrant who had been involved in criminality, as usual with the millions of illegal immigrants flooding into Europe, no attempt had ever been made to deport him.
While the politically-correct claim that you know what is a religion of peace, even the French Interior Minister Gerard Collomb has admitted,“France is in a state of war”.
It’s not just rhetoric. From the November Paris concert attacks in 2015 that killed 130 people and wounded another 400+, to the Bastille Day truck ramming attack last year that killed 86 and wounded 458, the war is real.
A couple of years ago, people would have thought you were mad had you suggested that 239 French would be murdered and almost 1,000 injured in their own country by West-hating scumbags allowed into our countries by our virtue-signalling libtard elites. But now our rulers just organise a couple of candle-lit vigils and then brush off these mounting numbers of casualties of their treacherous policies as minor irritants to be forgotten as soon as possible.
(Perhaps the likes of Lily Allen and Gary Lineker and J.K. Rowling and Emma Thompson and Fiona Bruce and Jon Snow and Kathy Newman even crack open a bottle of champagne every time innocent Western lives are lost in *sl*mic terror attacks? I doubt it, but who knows? The liberal elites seem to hate us so much that perhaps there are some people who believe the elites rejoice when we are slaughtered?)
French casualties in France are worse than in Afghanistan. The French lost 70 people to *sl*mic terrorist attacks in Afghanistan. And 239 to *sl*mic terrorist attacks in France.
The French losses in Afghanistan were suffered in over a decade of deployment in one of the most dangerous *sl*mic areas in the world. The French losses in France were suffered in less than two years.
There’s something very wrong when Afghanistan is safer for the French than France.
10,000 French soldiers were deployed in the streets of their own country in Operation Sentinelle after the Charlie Hebdo – Kosher supermarket attacks in 2015. Thousands of French soldiers are still patrolling, guarding and shooting in French cities which have become more dangerous than Afghanistan.
Operation Sentinelle has deployed twice as many French soldiers to France as to Afghanistan. And French casualties in the *sl*mic war at home have been far higher that they were in Afghanistan.
When the French intervened to stop the *sl*mist takeover of Mali, they suffered a handful of losses. The 4,000 French soldiers came away from Operation Serval with 9 casualties and Operation Barkhane amounted to 5 dead. The Gulf War? Another 9 dead. It’s a lot safer to be a French soldier fighting Al Qaeda in a M*sl*m country than a Parisian civilian going to a concert in his or her own city.
French casualties due to *sl*mic terror in just the last two years are approaching the 300 French casualties in the 3-year Korean War.
The recent horrific attack in Las Vegas, in which 58 innocents were killed and over 500 injured, has been a gift from heaven for the lefty, libtard, migrant-hugging, *sl*mophiliac elites in politics and the media. “Look”, the libtards can claim, “terrorism is not just caused by Jihadis. White non-M*sl*ms can also be terrorists”.
Watching Fiona Bruce on BBC News just after the attack, she seemed to me to be giggling with delight as she reported that the Las Vegas massacre had been committed by a white man with apparently no links to our friends from the Religion of Peace and Harmony. Channel 4 News – Jon Snow, Kathy Newman and Krishnan Someone – wasn’t much better.
Given that there have apparently been no major Jihadi attacks over the last few weeks, apart from a couple of girls in France having their throats slit and a few people being run over by a van in Canada, the media have managed to get away with this new narrative of non-*sl*mic terror being just as dangerous as, if not more dangerous than, *sl*mic religiously-inspired terror. But, of course, one reason the media been able to propagate this false narrative is because the media chooses to not report 99% of Jihadi religiously-inspired terror attacks.
Did you know that during the last 30 days there have been no fewer than 147 religiously-inspired *sl*mic attacks in 20 countries? I doubt it. Did you know that around 850 innocents have been killed in these 147 *sl*mic attacks and another 739 injured? I doubt it.
I doubt you knew anything about these 147 *sl*mic attacks in 20 countries killing 850 innocents and injuring another 739. I doubt you knew about these attacks because our rulers and their sycophantic media are terrified of unleashing civil war in the West and so censor almost all stories of *sl*mic mayhem and murder.
So, next time some bleeding-heart libtard gleefully drools over the 58 Las Vegas killed and 500+ wounded by a white American with no links to *sl*mic terrorists, please remember the never-mentioned 850 innocents killed and 739 innocents injured just in the last 30 days by our friends from the Religion of Peace and Love. Please remember that in 2016 there were 2,478 *sl*mic attacks in 59 countries, in which 21,245 people were killed and 26,682 injured. Please remember that so far this year there have been 1,607 *sl*mic attacks in 55 countries, in which 10,941 people were killed and 11,298 injured.
And here are just the last few days’ *sl*mic attacks – there isn’t space here for all the 147 committed during the last 30 days by *sl*mists who clearly have nothing to do with *sl*m which is (as our rulers keep telling us) a religion of peace:
Date
Country
City
Killed
Injured
Description
2017.10.05
Pakistan
Jhal Magsi
18
25
A suicide bomber goes off at a Sufi shrine, killing at least eighteen.
2017.10.05
Somalia
Bosaso
1
2
A businessman is shot to death at a coffee shop by Islamic extremists.
2017.10.04
Niger
Tillabéri
8
2
Three Americans are among eight members of a security patrol killed during an ambush by Islamic militants.
2017.10.04
Iraq
Hussayneyah
2
4
Two Iraqis are blown to bits by Mujahid car bombers.
2017.10.04
Libya
Misrata
4
40
An Islamic State suicide bomber detonates at a court complex, killing four.
2017.10.03
Pakistan
Yazman
1
0
A young women is honor killed with an axe for marrying against her family’s wishes.
2017.10.03
Iraq
Fallujah
3
0
A woman is among three residents killed in their own homes by ISIS bombs.
2017.10.03
India
Srinagar
1
2
Fedayeen stage a suicide attack near an airport, killing a guard.
2017.10.02
Iraq
Qaim
2
0
Two young people are executed for ‘apostasy’ by the caliphate.
2017.10.02
India
Padgampora
1
0
Religious extremists barge into a house a shoot a man to death in cold blood.
2017.10.02
Pakistan
Malam Jabba
1
2
A bomb planted by religious radicals claims the life of a villager.
2017.10.02
Syria
Damscus
17
20
Two Shahid suicide bombers slaughter seventeen.
2017.10.01
Sudan
Zalingei
1
9
Islamic milita fire into a displaced persons camp, killing at least one refugee.
2017.10.01
France
Marseille
2
0
A man shouting praises to Allah slits the throat of one women and stabs another to death.
2017.10.01
Russia
Tetkino
1
0
Muslim terrorists murder a border guard.
2017.09.30
England
Birmingham
0
1
A 14-year-old Shiite is stabbed in a targeted attack by Sunni radicals.
2017.09.30
Nigeria
Bama
1
0
One person is killed during a Boko Haram attack.
2017.09.30
Afghanistan
Herat
2
2
Two Taliban bombs take care of two Afghans.
2017.09.30
Sudan
Tawila
1
3
Janjaweed militia shoot a local herdsman to death.
2017.09.30
Canada
Edmonton, AB
0
4
A man with an ISIS flag stabs a cop and runs over four pedestrians.
2017.09.29
Russia
Belogorsk
2
2
An observant Muslim soldier turns his automatic weapon on non-Muslim peers, killing two.
2017.09.29
Afghanistan
Kabul
5
29
At least five innocents are massacred outside a Shiite mosque by a Sunni suicide bomber.
2017.09.29
Somalia
Barire
10
11
A suicide bomber attacks a local army base, killing ten.
2017.09.29
Afghanistan
Kansak
9
3
A brutal attack by Islamic radicals leaves nine dead.
“A reputation is like virginity – once lost, it’s rather difficult to get back”. I don’t know which genius wrote that. It might even be me?
It was excruciating and somewhat sad watching the Tory conference in Manchester, particularly Saint Theresa’s great leader’s closing speech. The Tories are probably not hugely liked by most people. But since the disastrous Blair/Brown years, when it comes to elections and choosing the party that will govern most competently, the Tories tend beat Labour with most voters apart from the idiotic, narcissistic, safe-space, we want-to-be-ruled-by-Germany, immigrants-welcome, snowflake generation.
But a reputation is fragile. And like virginity, once lost it’s rather difficult to regain.
With May’s seemingly endless prevarication over triggering Article 50 to leave the EU, with her bungled and unnecessary election and with her cabinet constantly at each other’s throats, the Tories have lost their reputation for competence. And once they’ve lost that, what have they got to offer voters apart from a few watered-down policies – stuff on student fees, council houses, energy prices etc – all blatantly plagiarised from Comrade Corbyn’s resurgent Labour? Perhaps Saint Theresa’s hapless offering yesterday was the last straw that will have turned the Tories from the party of competence to a complete laughing stock?
There used to be a French comic-strip character called Gaston Lagaffe. “Gaffe” is, of course the French for “gaffe”. Gaston was a gag-a-day comic strip created in 1957 by the Belgian cartoonist Andre Franquin in the Franco-Belgian comics magazine Spirou. The series focuses on the everyday life of Gaston Lagaffe (whose surname means “the blunder”), a lazy and accident-prone office junior. I guess Gaston was a kind of French Mr Bean.
After yesterday’s farce, it’ getting ever more difficult to spot the difference between the blundering, hapless, accident-prone office junior Gaston, Mr Bean and our very own accident-prone political superstar Theresa May – a woman clearly promoted well above her level of competence:
Generally, it’s not great for a political leader to be seen as an accident-prone bungler. To be successful, a leader should command our respect, not elicit our pity.
This rather leaves the Tories stuck between a very big rock and an even bigger hard place. If they get rid of Theresa “Gaston Lagaffe” May, then Labour and the public will probably demand a new election which Comrade Jeremy “Maduro” Corbyn would win with a landslide and then turn Britain into Europe’s Venezuela. But if the Tories keep Theresa “Mr Bean” May as leader, then we risk another two to three years of recidivist slipping on banana skins till May eventually quits for supposed “health” or “family” reasons to be replaced by someone less accident-prone.
At a time when our enemies – France and Germany – have strong leaders, Britain has a total shambles of a government.
As we approach Brexit, it’s not looking great for once Great Britain.
You’ve probably noticed that the BBC is gearing up for its annual CHILDREN IN NEED appeal. The big night is Friday 17 November 2017.
The BBC claims that “every penny you give makes a difference”. But a difference for whom? The children in need? Or the BBC bureaucrats and pen-pushers?
Before you hand over your money, let me just tell you a few inconvenient truths about this great charitable event. Then you can judge for yourself whether you really should be throwing your already heavily-taxed cash into that great, corrupt, politically-biased, left-wing, steaming cesspit of parasitical, self-serving, overpaid, over-pensioned bureaucrats that is the BBC.
The BBC’s CHILDREN IN NEED charity only has 110 employees. But they seem to be awfully lucky employees indeed. While the average employee cost (salary, NI and pension contributions) at our larger charities is between £20,000 and £30,000, the employee cost at the BBC’s CHILDREN IN NEED is a wonderful £42,546, slightly up from £41,270 just two years ago . That’s considerably higher than employee costs at charities like Oxfam, Save the Children,Red Cross and Age UK:
Moreover, the CHILDREN IN NEED boss managing these 110 people (probably all based in comfortable offices in Central London) pocketed about £110,440 of our ‘charitable donations’ in 2015 and £119,934 in 2016 – an 8% increase in just one year. Not much austerity for him. That’s almost as much as the boss at Oxfam who got £137,773 in salary and pension for managing over 5,000 employees across the world, many of them in some of the world’s most dangerous countries and generating and spending income of over £140m, rather more than the BBC CHILDREN IN NEED’s more modest £57m.
Current employees at the BBC’s CHILDREN IN NEED are fortunate enough to be eligible for one of the most generous pension schemes in Britain – the BBC’s pension scheme, which will give them guaranteed, inflation-protected pensions for the rest of their lives.
Sadly for us licence-fee payers and for contributors to CHILDREN IN NEED, the BBC’s pension scheme is so unbelievably generous to BBC employees that it doesn’t have enough money to meet its liabilities. In fact, it has a shortfall of over £1bn. No problem – the BBC has decided to fatten up its own pension scheme with our money. Over the 12 years from 2014 to 2026 around £905,000,000 extra of our money (in addition to the regular contributions the BBC makes each month for each employee) will be put into the BBC pension scheme to ensure all BBC employees can have a comfortable, secure, well-rewarded retirement at our expense. So, Fiona Bruce and Angela Rippon and others of their ilk can relax in the knowledge that we will be paying for their luxury lives for many more decades.
As for the CHILDREN IN NEED part of this pension scheme, it was also underfunded and so in 2015 got an extra £274,000 of our charitable donations which rose to £298,000 in 2016. The BBC CHILDREN IN NEED would need 29,800 people donating £10 each just to help top up the CHILDREN IN NEED employees’ pension scheme for this year.
Of course, we should support worthy charities. But is it really necessary to allow greedy, money-grabbing, self-serving BBC bureaucrats to take such a generous cut of everything we give? Why don’t you just find a local charity and give directly? These over-paid, over-pensioned, self-regarding BBC bureaucrats are laughing at our stupidity and gullibility while grabbing huge amounts of our supposed ‘charitable donations’ for themselves.
Maybe it’s time to put an end to their party?
And if you know anyone who might be tempted to give their money to these lucky BBC bureaucrats, perhaps you should send them a link to today’s blog?
(Welcome to the new snouts-in-the-trough.com – the blog that is so achingly politically-correct that it never offends even the most delicate, sensitive snowflake)
With so many people worrying that mass migration and higher migrant birth rates will lead to white indigenous Europeans becoming minorities in their own countries and possible civil war between Europeans and the invading armies, we see it as our precious mission at snouts-in-the-trough.com to highlight the many wonderful benefits of open borders, Third-World take-over and multi-cultural diversity.
So, here’s a short video from Germany in which a ‘New German’ explains to an ‘Old German’ the fabulous future awaiting that country.
Ah, it makes me feel so appreciative of the great benefits the invading Third-World millions are bringing to our tired old continent.
As far as we’re concerned, here at snouts-in-the-trough.com it’s “violent, intolerant, uneducated, often-inbred, unemployable, parasitical Third-Worlders” (sorry, slip of the finger, I meant “highly-educated, hard-working, refugees who are all engineers, astrophysicists and brain surgeons” ) welcome!!!
(Welcome to the new snouts-in-the-trough.com – the blog that is so achingly politically-correct that it never offends even the most delicate, sensitive snowflake)
From 1GW to 4GW
No, 4GW is not a new form of Wifi. The term 4GW stands for “fourth generation warfare”. Some military experts classify different types and eras of warfare into four generations:
1st Generation: tactics of line and column; which developed in the age of the smoothbore musket. 1GW consisted of tightly ordered soldiers with top-down discipline. These troops would fight in close order and advance slowly. This began to change as the battlefield changed. Old line and column tactics are now considered suicidal as the bow and arrow/sword morphed into the rifle and machine gun
2nd Generation: tactics of linear fire and movement, with reliance on indirect fire. This type of warfare can be seen in the early stages of World War I where there was still strict adherence to drill and discipline of formation and uniform. However, there remained a dependence on artillery and firepower to break the stalemate
3rd Generation: tactics of infiltration to bypass and collapse the enemy’s combat forces rather than seeking to close with and destroy them. Also 3GW targets both military forces and home populations. Many of the battles of WWII were 3GW.
What about 4GW? Fourth-generation warfare is often seen in conflicts involving failing/failed states and civil wars, particularly in conflicts involving intractable ethnic or religious issues. Most 4GW will occur within countries and former countries rather than between countries.
Fourth-generation warfare has often involved an insurgent group or other violent non-state actor trying to implement their own government over the current ruling power structure. 4GW usually results in brutal internecine slaughter
The current conflicts in Syria, Iraq and Libya are examples of 4GW
Coming to a street near you?
The big question for our times is whether 4GW will break out in some European countries as the immigrant populations from the Middle East, Asia and Africa start becoming majorities.
I think replacement birth rates for a population are around 2.1 children per woman. Most European countries’ birth rates are down to between 1.1 and 1.4 children per woman meaning the indigenous population is ageing and declining. Meanwhile birth rates for immigrant populations from Africa, Asia and the Middle East are between 3 and 4 children per woman and some men will have more than one wife.
If this trend continues, it is a mathematical certainty (not waacissmm or bigotry – just simple arithmetic) that the populations of many European countries originating from Asia, Africa and the Middle East will outnumber the ethnic white populations within the next 30 to 40 years – say by 2050 to 2060. In many of Europe’s major cities the original white ethnic populations are already a minority – just one in three ‘Londoners’ is white British, for example.
We are handing over our continent, city by city, country by country, to people who have very different cultural, social, educational and religious backgrounds and very different philosophies of who should run those countries and how they should be run.
If we take the year 2000 as being the start of our rulers’ race replacement policy, then that means over a period of just 50 to 60 years, our rulers intend to change populations that were over 90% indigenous white Europeans to populations that are 60% or more from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Never in history has such a massive demographic change been done peacefully so quickly.
So, will this takeover of Europe by the immigrant hordes be wonderfully peaceful? Or will it be appallingly violent?
Will it end in joyful and diverse and prosperous multi-cultural paradises? Or will we see bloody, destructive, economically-catastrophic 4GW?
We can guess that the populations of Sweden, Belgium and the Netherlands are so gutless and emasculated that they will submit to this race replacement without a murmur of protest. Sweden already has over 65 ‘no-go’ areas where police and emergency services are afraid to operate. As for the Germans – well they’ll probably just obey orders as usual – “befehl ist befehl”.
But the situation in Britain and France is not so clear. In Britain the police and military will probably side with the invaders against indigenous Brits should the indigenous populations dare to try to defend their country. As for France, I’m led to believe by people I know in the French military that they will fight on the side of preserving French values and civilisation. Moreover, I believe many former French military have weapons at home and they too will not allow their country to be over-run.
But who really knows? The last time someone tried such rapid race replacement was Germany’s “Lebensraum” policy during WWII when over 30 million were slaughtered to make room for the Germans to expand into Eastern Europe and Russia and also Japan’s expansion in Asia – another 10 to 20 million innocents massacred.
(Welcome to snouts-in-the-trough.com – the blog that never offends even the most delicate, sensitive snowflake)
Weekend blog – As I try to fathom how one can write a current affairs blog under Britain’s new Stalinist censorship laws (see my blog of two days ago about supposed “hate crimes”), I thought I’d turn to something a little less serious today – Ryanair and libtard stupidity
First – Ryanair
I actually few with Ryanair a few days ago. It was a truly awful experience. Not because of the tiny, crammed seats or the staff forced to sell you overpriced crap. But because of the other passengers. Never have I experienced such a bunch of howling, drunken, foul-mouthed ladettes, porcine, alcohol-swilling couples with screaming babies and bloated, boozed-up lard mountains with obnoxious, yelling brats (who should have been in school?). I almost admired the Ryanair staff for maintaining their calm when faced with such dreadful management and even worse passengers while earning a pittance.
Anyway, here’s a story doing the rounds about Michael O’Leary, Chief Executive of Ryanair – Europe’s favourite airline.
After arriving in a hotel in Manchester, O’Liary went to the bar and asked for a pint of Guinness.
The barman nodded and said, “That will be £1 please, Mr. O’Liary.”
Somewhat taken aback, O’Leary replied, “That’s very cheap,” and handed over his money.
“Well, we do try to stay ahead of the competition”, said the barman. “And we are serving free pints every Wednesday from 6 pm until 8 pm. We have the cheapest beer in England”.
“That is remarkable value”, Michael comments.
“I see you don’t seem to have a glass”, the barman told O’Liary, “so you’ll probably need one of ours. That will be £3 please.”
O’Leary scowled, but paid up.
He took his drink and walked towards a seat. “Ah, you want to sit down?” said the barman. “That’ll be an extra £2. You could have pre-booked the seat, and it would have only cost you £1.”
But before O’Leary could sit down, the barman said to him,“I think you may be too big for the seat sir, can I ask you to sit in this measuring frame please”.
Michael attempts to sit down. But in spite of O’Leary being rather diminutive, the frame is too small and, when he can’t squeeze in, he complains “Nobody would fit in that little frame”.
“I’m afraid if you can’t fit in the frame you’ll have to pay an extra surcharge of £4 for your seat sir” the barman explained the bar’s rules to a very miffed O’Leary.
O’Leary swore to himself, but paid up. “I see that you have brought your laptop with you” added the barman. “And since that wasn’t pre-booked either, that will be another £3.”
O’Leary was so incensed that he walked back to the bar, slammed his drink on the counter and yelled, “This is ridiculous, I want to speak to the manager”.
“I see you want to use the counter,” says the barman, “that will be £2 please.”
O’Leary’s face was red with rage. “Do you know who I am?”
“Of course I do Mr. O’Leary. You’re an important airline boss and yet you’re someone who is too stupid to have checked out our rules and to have brought his own glass and pre-booked your seat and laptop and to have printed out your booking confirmation before coming into our bar – the cheapest bar in England.”
“I’ve had enough! What sort of a hotel bar is this? I come in for a quiet drink and you treat me like this. I insist on speaking to a manager!”
“Our manager is too busy to talk to customers. But here is our customer service e-mail address, or if you wish, you can contact them between 9.00 am and 9.02 am every morning, Monday to Tuesday at this free-phone number. Calls are free, until they are answered, then there is a talking charge of only £1 per second, or part thereof”.
“I will never use this bar again”.
“OK sir, we may treat our customers like sh*t, but do remember, we are the only hotel in England selling pints for £1. So, however badly we treat our customers and however much we insult them, they’ll always keep coming back here for their £1 pints.”
Libtard stupidity
And here for your enlightenment and entertainment is a compilation of we-know-best, politically-correct, virtue-signalling, arrogant, self-regarding libtards prior to the 2016 US presidential election smugly and mockingly telling us stupid, unwashed, pig-ignorant plebs why Donald Trump could never become US President.
David Craig, on October 11th, 2017
