It seems that my new Brexit video, “The Brexit Song” is being more than slightly delayed. A bit like Brexit itself. Though hopefully, unlike Brexit, my video will eventually be delivered.
So instead, let’s start today’s blog with a touching (in the real sense of the word) family photo. This was taken at the funeral of Biden’s son Beau. The three interesting people in the photo are US Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden, Hallie the widow of Biden’s son Beau and Biden’s son Hunter.
As you’ll see, Creepy Hands-on Joe Biden is ‘comforting’ his son’s rather attractive widow. Biden’s other son Hunter is standing respectfully in the background.
Hunter’s private life has been slightly more than colourful. In 2014 he was kicked out of the Navy Reserve for taking cocaine. In 2017 it was revealed that he was dating Hallie Olivere, the widow of his brother Beau, who died of cancer in 2015.
In a bitter divorce, his wife, Kathleen, claimed he had spent “extravagantly on his own interests (including drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs and gifts for women with whom he has sexual relations), while leaving the family with no funds to pay legitimate bills”.
In April 2014 Hunter was appointed to the board of Burisma, a large Ukrainian energy company. His role was to oversee regulatory compliance. His father, at the time, was the Obama administration’s point man for Ukraine, focusing particularly on an anti-corruption drive, and had visited Kiev, the capital.
Bank records show that Hunter’s firm, Rosemont Seneca Partners, received an estimated $3m in payments from Burisma in just over a year. Hunter had worked as a gambling industry lobbyist in Washington and had no relevant experience for his highly paid berth at Burisma.
“Hunter Biden has no background in energy or Ukraine or regulatory compliance,” said Peter Schweizer, an investigative journalist and editor-at-large at Breitbart News. “He has no track record as an international businessman. There’s really no good explanation as to why he gets that sweet a deal.”
The same month that Hunter joined the Burisma board, Britain’s Serious Fraud Office froze $23m in bank accounts in London that allegedly belonged to Burisma’s owner, as part of an investigation into money laundering.
Recently the Ukrainian general prosecutor, Yuriy Lutsenko, revealed that he was renewing interest in the Burisma case and the Biden family’s connection to the company, giving the Bidens a possible headache
Questions have also been asked about a $1bn deal that Hunter made on highly favourable terms with a Chinese government investment firm, having first travelled to China on Air Force Two with his father in 2011.
As you’ll know, the mainstream media loathes democratically-elected President Donald Trump and has spent more than 3 years trying to dig up some dirt on the Donald alleging all kinds of corruption connected with Trump’s business dealings with Russia. And you can imagine the mainstream press’s feeding frenzy if they could have found any of Trump’s family engaged with dodgy foreign companies. Imagine the screaming headlines. Imagine the mouth-frothing fury of all the commentators.
But, of course, the mainstream media worships Democrat Saint Obama and anything to do with Saint Obama. So, as Obama’s former vice president, Biden can expect the mainstream media to be more than generous in avoiding investigating any scandals connected with his family. There won’t be any screaming headlines about Biden family corruption. There won’t be any mouth-frothing outrage.
Below is a short (1 minute) YouTube video of ‘Honest’ Joe Biden boasting at how easily he got the Ukrainian general prosecutor fired. Yup, I believe that’s the prosecutor general who was investigating the company which employed Biden’s son. Am I the only person who smells something rotten?
And Britain has produced a couple worthy competitors for the Islamocoolest lunatic in the world:
But when it comes to being the most Islamocoolest of them all, most people would have thought that Osama Bin Laden could win:
After all, in one of his greatest hits, he had thousands of hated infidels killed in the 9/11 attacks. But he was also responsible for hundreds of other Al Qaeda attacks around the world massacring thousands more.
But Osama got wasted – even though our allies, the ever-trustworthy Pakistanis, had hidden him right next to a large Pakistani military base in the expectation that nobody would dare harm him while he was under Pakistani military protection. (And we still give hundreds of millions in foreign aid to a country which has repeatedly shown it is our sworn enemy and which rather likes murdering Christians):
The bearded guy screaming for Aasia Bibi’s death is also pretty Islamocool, don’t you think?
But now when it comes to being the Islamocoolest dude of them all, there’s a new kid on the block. It’s Al Big Daddy (also known as Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi)
Don’t you just love Al Big Daddy’s two-toned beard? Osama had a great beard. But it was a pathetic, shriveled weed compared to Al Big Daddy’s two-toned monster bush. Big Daddy is just so cool. He’s Islamocool. In fact, he’s the Islamocoolest hombre around. Big Daddy is responsible for tens of thousands of extremely brutal deaths and, unlike our former rockstar terrorist Osama Bin Laden, Al Big Daddy is still very much alive in spite of both the Russians and the Americans claiming they had long since sent him to Paradise.
I expect we’ll see many of our friends from the Religion of Total Peacefulness adopting Big Al’s fashionable two-tone beard look. It’s what gets the ladies really turned on and flocking to some Third-World hell-hole to be serially f****d by Big Al and his faithful followers.
By the way, why do these bearded chappies always seem so angry?
More gibberish from a bearded lunatic?
On a slightly more serious note, I won’t even lower myself to comment on this video clip of a leading but modestly bearded researcher from our favouritest religion except to say that there are tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions of possibly low-IQ, inbred, retarded, bearded madmen, who believe the garbage he spews out. And that’s a problem for the world:
The clear message from this ‘infographic’ seems to be that black people in Britain are four to five times more likely to commit criminal offences and be sent to prison than white people. Chinese Brits seem to have the lowest offending rates.
But I don’t understand how this can be as we’re constantly assured by our rulers and the BBC and C4 News that all races and cultures are equal. In fact, it’s often suggested that white people are inferior to all the wonderfully vibrant other races who have invited themselves into our formerly drab, mono-cultural country
Does this mean that government statistics are waaacccisssst?
I wonder why our Office for National Statistics doesn’t do what the Swedish authorities now do – conceal any information about the ethnic background of people committing crimes? In fact, it’s now a criminal offence in Sweden to refer to the ethnic background of anyone committing a crime. For example, an artist in Sweden has been sent to prison for tweeting: “Rape culture is fundamental and OK among MENA [Middle East and North African] people.”
No doubt, our rulers will look to Sweden with envy and soon bring in new ‘race hate’ laws here in Britain so that in our fabulous new Big Brother State anyone mentioning the ethnic background of criminals in Britain will also be deemed as committing a supposed ‘hate crime’ for telling the truth.
And publishing pictures like the one below (of mainly ‘Asian’ rape gangs) will incur prison sentences:
And for anyone who hasn’t seen it, here’s my short (3 minutes) video of “Khan’s Bloodsoaked Streets of London”. (Please send the link to your contacts if you’ve already seen it – the singer is incredible even if my graphics are pretty basic)
Strangely, most of those featured in the video seem to be from a multi-culturally enriching background. This fits in with the Office for National Statistics’s ‘infographic’.
What could this be telling us? That uncontrolled immigration and multi-culturalism aren’t such great ideas? Surely not?
To paraphrase Lady Bracknell: “To commit political suicide once is unfortunate, to commit political suicide twice starts to look like carelessness”.
But incredibly, that’s what the useless, infighting, self-immolating Tories seem to be doing.
Political suicide Number 1
The worthless, scheming Tories’ first attempt at committing political suicide came from promising to implement the result of the 2016 EU Leave/Remain Referendum and then spending 3 years deliberately sabotaging Brexit in order to keep us in their beloved German-controlled Fourth Reich (aka the EU). The Tories lied and lied and lied and lied to us. Theresa May promised over 106 times that “no deal was better than a bad deal” and then abandonned any pretence of leaving the EU on WTO terms. Most of the other Tory scumbags kept saying they would “honour the result of the Referendum” while doing everything in their power to block Brexit. You know who you are – liars and traitors
But enough of that. You all know the details of what happened and how the Establishment betrayed the votes of 17.4 million people.
Following their lies and betrayal of their Brexit promises, the Tories are loathed by millions of former Conservative voters. The pointless Tories hope that fear of Mad Jeremy Corbyn and the extraordinary Diane Abbott will coerce voters to hold their noses and vote Conservative at the next election. I believe they have seriously misjudged widespread public fury and that millions will never forget and never forgive. I believe the Tory Party truly has committed political suicide.
If I was Crazy Jeremy Corbyn, I’d already be surfing the Internet for new curtains and furniture for Number 10.
Political suicide Number 2
There is, however, one slim hope for the Tories. That would be to replace the ghastly, incompetent, ever-capitulating Theresa May with a new charismatic leader who could attract voters. Looking at the contenders to be the next Tory leader, one is hardly excited about our country’s future:
Of course, there’s also Michael Gove:
A (IMHO) lying, self-serving, untrustworthy, scheming political rat who is about as inspiring and charismatic as a cow fart.
And not forgetting the Mekon:Some Tories apparently believe that if they choose the Mekon, they’ll get the Religion of Peace block vote of at least three times as many votes as there are Religion of Peace voters. Sorry to disappoint Tory strategists, but the Religion of Peace block vote of possibly 10 million votes from 3 million voters will stay firmly with Israel-hating, Hezbollah-loving Labour.
But there is one contender who stands head and shoulders above this bunch of twopenny-halfpenny political pygmies. That’s Boris Johnson:
Twice Johnson won the mayoral election in strongly Labour London where only one in three voters is ethnic white British. That’s an incredible achievement. And Boris Johnson won because he is positive, charismatic and radiates optimism. Of course, he often blunders. But he can guard against this by surrounding himself with intelligent advisers. However, looking at the Tory candidates for PM, Boris Johnson is (IMHO) the only one who could possibly go against someone with Nigel Farage’s personal appeal.
Of course, you may not agree with me. But let’s just assume for a moment that Boris Johnson is the only hope the worthless, dishonest and incompetent Tories have of avoiding oblivion at the next general election, what are the Tories doing about getting him into position?
Ah yes, I remember. The risible Tories are plotting a “stop Boris” campaign. They’re actively looking for ways to prevent their only credible candidate from becoming Tory leader. They’d rather have a charisma-free nonentity than Boris Johnson, probably because they’re all charisma-free nonentities and are envious of Johnson’s popularity.
And that’s the Tories’ second act of political suicide – deliberately preventing their most electable candidate from becoming the next PM.
Bye Bye Tories – you’ve really done a double clusterf**k and hopefully you’ll be deservedly consigned to the dustbin of history at the next election.
Oh, and here’s another prediction I’ll make: if Corbyn does win the next election due to the Tories’ double self-immolation, Labour will lower the voting age to 17 or even 16 thus ensuring they get the schoolchildren’s snowflake vote and remain in power in perpetuity or at least till they’ve reduced once great Britain to the Venezuela of Europe. Then we’ll really need someone like Farage, who believes in Britain, to rescue us.
To cheer us all up
Americans aren’t great at satire. But here’s a reasonable attempt. Enjoy “The Day Collusion Died”:
I’m running late today and so haven’t time to write the blog I wanted.
A couple of days ago, I produced my own short (4 minutes) YouTube video explaining in three simple pictures why the idea of Man-Made Climate Change is utter rubbish:
And I wondered why politicians and the media are fawning and grovelling to a (IMHO) ignorant, brainwashed member of the Adams family and an (IMHO) increasingly senile old fool. Here they are – Greta Thunberg and former national treasure Sir David Attenborough:
Ooops, was that the wrong picture? Is this the right one? Forgive me, after listening to what they’ve both been saying recently, I’m not really sure:
Anyway here’s someone who knows a bit more about the environment and climate than I do. Here’s the former president of Greenpeace Canada (not Greenpeace’s co-founder as the video clip states although I do understand that he was behind the massive expansion of Greenpeace in Canada and the USA) saying that Man-Made Climate Change is a load of bollox. Mr Moore’s credentials are:
Honorary Doctorate of Science, North Carolina State University (2005)
Ph.D. in Ecology, Institute of Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia (1974)
Honors B.Sc. in Forest Biology, University of British Columbia.
When you read the title of today’s blog, probably you’ll think I’ve finally lost it – that an overdose of Izlumophobia has made me take leave of my senses. After all, it’s absurd (you will think) that France’s greatest Catholic cathedral could be turned into a mosque. But stay with me for a couple of minutes while I explain.
France’s new diminutive Napoleon, President Macron, has promised to restore Notre Dame to its former glory. So far, so good. But he also stated that « Notre-Dame doit être reconstruite conformément à la modernité et la diversité de la France »
Can you spot the dangerous words here? Yup, they are “modernité” and, of course, “diversité”.
By using the word “modernité”, Macron is rejecting the idea of restoring Notre Dame to just a copy of how the building was before the ‘accidental’ fire. This has got loads of major international architecture firms circling the gutted cathedral like vultures circling a dead carcass as they scent that there are loads of money to be made for whoever gets the big redesign contract.
But more worrying is the word “diversité”. What does“diversité” mean in today’s France? More Jews? Probably not as many of France’s Jews are emigrating to avoid the growing number of anti-semitic attacks. More Hindus? Probably not? More Buddhists? Probably not. More Trekkies? Probably not. More of our friends from our favourite religion? Probably. In fact, definitely.
So far we’ve only been given the word “diversité” to soften us up about Emperor Macron’s plans for Notre Dame. But I bet it won’t be long before we start hearing the word “multi-faith” (whatever that is in French). The French progressive, globalist, Izlumophiliac elites will soon be telling us something like “Notre Dame should become a symbol of national unity”, that it “should represent all faiths” and that it “should be rebuilt for the benefit of all faiths”. I admit, we haven’t heard this yet. But I believe these kind of statements will soon be coming our way.
Then we can expect the following:
there will be an international competition to choose a design for the restoration/rebuilding
the chosen design will be less obviously Christian and more representative of a mish-mash of religions
in a few years the rebuilt cathedral will have both a leading Christian cleric and its own imam
gradually the number of worshippers from our loveliest and most peaceful religion will far outnumber those from any other religion
in 10 to 15 years, we’ll wake up to the fact that Notre Dame has become more of a mosque than a Catholic cathedral
Of course, I could be wrong. I usually am – that’s why I’ve ended up writing spiteful blogs while most of those I went to university with are multi-millionaires. Envious? Me? Never!
But as France’s religion of peacefulness population increases and increases and increases, while its Catholic population decreases, I suspect the scenario I describe above will become reality.
Notre Dame will, to all intents and purposes, have become a mosque.
The progressive, liberal, globalist elites would never dare suggest that Notre Dame should become a mosque. But like so much else they have destroyed – patriotism, heterosexual marriage, sense of national identity, community belonging – they (supported by a propagandising mainstream media) will achieve their goals gradually by chipping away at the foundations of our civilisation till their dystopian vision for our future becomes our daily reality.
I can’t stand it. It seems like every TV channel and every newspaper and every political leader actually believe Global Warming is caused by human activity. This is truly incredible. Not since people believed that the Earth was flat and you could fall off the edge have so many been fooled into believing such misconceived garbage.
In desperation, I’ve produced my own David Craig video debunking the Man-Made Global Warming hoax in just three simple pictures.
So, you have a choice. Do you believe a (IMHO) ghastly, precocious, attention-seeking, pig-ignorant schoolgirl (who looks like a member of the Adams family) and a (IMHO) revered national treasure who has suddenly turned into a senile, doddery old fool?
Or do you believe my simple but straightforward explanation of the reasons for our climate changing?
I leave that decision up to you.
(Apologies that this video is a bit slapdash. But I still haven’t quite worked out how to use the free voice-recording software I downloaded from the Internet)
It’s a bit early in the morning to think deep thoughts. So instead, I’d just like to touch on something that I find deeply troubling but probably won’t explain terribly well.
Extraordinary things are happening in both the UK and the US. And they are both very similar. The progressive, virtue-signalling, liberal elites in both countries are refusing to accept that they lost the argument in 2016 and are prepared to totally trash democracy and make their countries world-wide laughing stocks in order to overturn election results they didn’t like.
UK – Brexit never meant Brexit
In 2016 we had the EU Remain/Leave Referendum. The Leave side won by 17.4 million votes to the Remain’s 16.1 million. In a democracy, it’s normal for the losers to accept the result with good grace and to move on. Of course, this is not what happened. Instead the Remain sore losers started screaming that the result was unfair (because they lost). Then we were bombarded with a huge turgid pile of excuses of why the result was unfair:
the Leave side lied to the voters
the Leave side spent more money than allowed
people didn’t know what they were voting for
older people shouldn’t have been allowed to vote
the Russians interfered in the vote
we need another vote in case people have changed their minds
etc etc etc
These excuses totally ignored the fact that the Government spent £9 million of taxpayers’ money trying to rig the result by sending pro-Remain propaganda to every household in Britain:
Moreover, the Remainers ran a constant Project Fear campaign vomiting lie after lie after lie about the economic disaster and hundreds of thousands of lost jobs that would follow a vote to leave. The Remainers also enlisted Saint Obama to threaten us with dire trade consequences if we dared to disobey the orders of the ruling elites by voting to leave the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic, globalist EU.
We were promised the Government would implement what we voted for:
But it was all lies – the progressive, globalist, liberal elites never intended to let us leave the EU and have successfully waged a 3-year campaign to sabotage Brexit and keep us in the EU.
Of course, you all know this. But what is perhaps more worrying is that we see an almost mirror image of this situation in the US.
USA – Clinton was meant to win
Again, let’s go back to 2016. The US presidential elections. Everyone assumed Clinton would win. After all, every single mainstream media in the US and abroad backed the Establishment candidate, Clinton, and she spent (I think) about 5 times more on her bid than Trump could manage.
But when Trump won (as with the Leave side winning in Britain) the sore-loser liberal elites immediately started screaming that the result was ‘unfair’. Then the US public were bombarded with a huge turgid pile of excuses of why the result was unfair:
Clinton won the popular vote
the only people voting for Trump were bigoted racists (the deplorables)
older people voted Trump and destroyed the future of young Americans
But the biggest excuse of all was, of course:
the Russians interfered in the vote
The Clintonites, naturally, chose to not mention the many millions poured into the Clintons’ already bulging bank accounts by the Gulf Arabs and what they expected in return for their generosity. They never mentioned that it was the Arabs, rather than the Russians, who actually interfered in the campaign.
Then, just as in Britain, we had a massive 3-year campaign by the sore-loser (misleadingly named) ‘Democrats’ to overturn the result of the election. In the US this consisted of a witch hunt trying to establish that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian Government to interfere in the presidential election. For 3 years the mainstream US media were howling “collusion, collusion, collusion” to try to overturn an election result they didn’t agree with.
But now, that it has been proven that there was no collusion, the liberal elites still can’t accept that they lost the argument in 2016. So, instead of accusing Trump of collusion, they’re going for “obstruction of justice”. Incredibly, they’re claiming that Trump somehow broke the law by allegedly preventing an investigation into a crime that never happened. We are moving into a mad world that only someone like Kafka could have imagined
It’s the same the whole world over
So what? Why have I just wasted several minutes of your lives with this?
It’s because I believe we have entered a new era in politics. This is an era where Democracy is dead because the progressive, liberal, globalist, bureaucratic elites believe that only they know what is good for us deplorable, bigoted, narrow-minded, racist ordinary people. Therefore they are convinced they have the right to ignore and/or overturn the results of any elections that don’t go their way.
Whether it’s about immigration, Izlumification, economics, globalisation, the environment or whatever, the progressive, globalist, libtard elites feel they can ignore the views of ordinary voters.
That’s a very dangerous situation which could lead to a massive and possibly violent (as we see in France with the gilets jaunes protestors) backlash from those ordinary people the elites despise so much for their ‘wrong-thought’ and ‘wrong-votes’.
I admit I didn’t watch the whole of the BBC’s dreadfully misleading supposed documentary “Climate Change – the facts”. I just couldn’t stomach so much misleading BBC progressive woke propaganda. After all, during my youth I spent a bit of time in the Soviet Union and so saw enough garbage propaganda to last a lifetime.
There were so many things one could criticise about the programme:
why didn’t the programme mention the effect on the Earth’s climate of variations in solar activity?
why didn’t the programme mention the effect on the Earth’s climate from small deviations in its orbit?
why did the programme not mention that CO2 is a vital element in ensuring plant growth such that many farmers growing food in greenhouses actually use CO2 generators to increase the amount of CO2 to improve plant growth?
why didn’t the programme mention the fact that a warming climate causes the oceans to release more CO2? So, increasing CO2 may be the result of warming rather than its cause?
why was a programme supposedly giving us the ‘facts’ spending so much time featuring protesting schoolchildren whose grasp of complex multiple-factor feedback systems like the Earth’s climate would be more than questionable?
But I’ll leave a full criticism of the trashy Soviet-style propaganda programme to people with a better understanding of climate science than myself.
The most misleading chart ever produced?
I’d just like to focus on one detail of the BBC’s propaganda programme to show how misleading the whole thing was. Despite claiming to give us the ‘facts’ on climate change, the programme (I believe from the bits I did watch) only featured one actual chart of the Earth’s temperature – the one that starts in 1850:
But why did the programme choose a chart that started in 1850? Why not 1750? Or 1650? Or 1900? Or even thousands of years ago? After all, there are been plenty of scientific studies using ice cores and other methods to estimate the Earth’s temperature changes over longer periods.
The well-worn 1850s chart is wonderful for the Warmies as it shows the Earth’s climate becoming increasingly warm as industrialisation gathers pace and spreads around the world. There you have it folks! It’s clear from the chart that the Earth’s warming climate must be due to industrialisation and the increasing CO2 emissions caused by industrialisation and the use of fossil fuels. So, the science is settled (claims Sir David).
But hold on a minute. Being an obviously low-IQ simpleton, I’d like to put the 1850s chart into a wider context. Let’s go back a bit before the carefully-chosen 1850s chart. Here are the estimated Earth’s temperatures taken from the study of ice cores:
Looking at this chart, we can see the Earth has clear warming and cooling cycles. Looking at this chart we can see that we are moving out of what has been called the ‘Little Ice Age’ and into what has been called the ‘Modern Warm Period‘. Looking at this chart we can see that current temperatures are NOT exceptional, but are actually below previous peaks. Looking at this longer-term chart, we can see how misleading the 1850s chart is.
Here’s another longer-term chart:
This one also suggests we are moving out of the ‘Little Ice Age’. The ‘Little Ice Age’ lasted from around 1300 to around 1870. Yippeee! By choosing a chart which conveniently starts in 1850 – at around the end of the ‘Little Ice Age’ – the Warmies can ‘conclusively prove’ that the Earth is definitely warming.
So, here are two key questions:
is the Earth warming? Yes, but as the warming plateaued for a few years, the Warmies started fiddling the figures to exaggerate the extent of the warming
is the warming due to human activity? No. The warming is part of a natural cycle in which we are now moving from a ‘Little Ice Age’ into the ‘Modern Warm Period’ and human activity probably has no effect at all on the long-term cycle of warming and cooling.
That’s why the Warmies love the 1850 chart so much. It hides the truth and supposedly supports their Man-Made Global Warming hoax.
The words “lying, data-manipulating scumbags” come to mind.
But it’s not the figures that are lying – it’s the people using and abusing those figures! By carefully choosing a short period – 1850 to the present – the BBC Warmies deliberately give a completely misleading impression of what is actually happening to the Earth’s climate.
Propaganda, deceit, lies! The BBC Warmies are at it yet again and again and again.
As for Sir David’s participation in what I believe is a hoax – legal considerations prevent me expressing my true feelings.
David Craig, on May 4th, 2019
