I write this just after the exit polls have come in, but before any real results. So, much can change by the time you read this. But the big question is: if the exit polls are right and Boris wins a reasonable working majority, how will the lying, hypocritical, europhiliac, UK-hating Remoaners react?
Will the Remoaners finally accept this result? Or will they demand a “People’s General Election” using one or more of the following excuses:
people didn’t know what they were voting for in yesterday’s election
the Conservatives never made it clear that they intended to “Get Brexit Done”
the Tories lied in their campaign whereas Labour and the LibDems were totally and utterly honest
this was just a General Election – we need another Referendum specifically on EU membership
10-year-olds should have been given the vote as it was their future being decided
anyone over 65 shouldn’t have been allowed to vote as they had no future
the South-Easy Asian community only had time to organise 4-5 postal votes per voter rather than the usual 10+ postal votes per voter
and so on and so on and so on forever…..
Or will we see the usual bunch of ********* (expletives deleted) heading to court to get that ghastly superannuated bunch of Remainer judges to overturn the result of the General Election and install Corbyn as PM? Or Maybe the ******** (expletives deleted) will try to impeach Boris Johnson for supposed ‘high crimes and misdemeanours’ because he was a bit of a cad with the ladies?
Whatever happens, don’t expect the Remoaners and their supporters in the BBC and C4 News to accept yet another election which didn’t go they way they ordered us to vote.
Still a bit undecided about whether to vote today and who to vote for?
Here are just a few of the main points on the two main parties.
On the one hand the Conservative Boris Johnson is a bit of a rascal with the ladies and can sometimes bend the truth a bit. He’s also a bit posh.
And on the other hand..
Labour‘s Jeremy “Commie” Corbyn
Invited two IRA members to parliament two weeks after the Brighton bombing.
Attended Bloody Sunday commemoration with bomber Brendan McKenna.
Attended meeting with Provisional IRA member Raymond McCartney.
Hosted IRA linked Mitchell McLaughlin in parliament.
Spoke alongside IRA terrorist Martina Anderson.
Attended Sinn Fein dinner with IRA bomber Gerry Kelly.
Chaired Irish republican event with IRA bomber Brendan MacFarlane.
Attended Bobby Sands commemoration honouring IRA terrorists.
Stood in minute’s silence for IRA gunmen shot dead by the SAS.
Refused to condemn the IRA in Sky News interview.
Refused to condemn the IRA on Question Time.
Refused to condemn IRA violence in BBC radio interview.
Signed EDM after IRA Poppy massacre massacre blaming Britain for the deaths.
Arrested while protesting in support of Brighton bomber’s co-defendants.
Lobbied government to improve visiting conditions for IRA killers.
Attended Irish republican event calling for armed conflict against Britain.
Hired suspected IRA man Ronan Bennett as a parliamentary assistant.
Hired another aide closely linked to several convicted IRA terrorists.
Heavily involved with IRA sympathising newspaper London Labour Briefing.
Put up £20,000 bail money for IRA terror suspect Roisin McAliskey.
Didn’t support IRA ceasefire.
Said Hamas and Hezbollah are his “friends“.
Called for Hamas to be removed from terror banned list.
Called Hamas “serious and hard-working“.
Attended wreath-laying at grave of Munich massacre terrorist.
Attended conference with Hamas and PFLP.
Photographed smiling with Hezbollah flag.
Attended rally with Hezbollah and Al-Muhajiroun.
Repeatedly shared platforms with PFLP plane hijacker.
Hired aide who praised Hamas’ “spirit of resistance“.
Accepted £20,000 for state TV channel of terror-sponsoring Iranian regime.
Opposed banning Britons from travelling to Syria to fight for ISIS.
Defended rights of fighters returning from Syria.
Said ISIS supporters should not be prosecuted.
Compared fighters returning from Syria to Nelson Mandela.
Said the death of Osama Bin Laden was a “tragedy“.
Wouldn’t sanction drone strike to kill ISIS leader.
Voted to allow ISIS fighters to return from Syria.
Opposed shoot to kill.
Attended event organised by terrorist sympathising IHRC.
Signed letter defending Lockerbie bombing suspects.
Wrote letter in support of conman accused of fundraising for ISIS.
Spoke of “friendship” with Mo Kozbar, who called for destruction of Israel.
Attended event with Abdullah Djaballah, who called for holy war against UK.
Called drone strikes against terrorists “obscene”.
Boasted about “opposing anti-terror legislation”.
Said laws banning jihadis from returning to Britain are “strange”.
Accepted £5,000 donation from terror supporter Ted Honderich.
Accepted £2,800 trip to Gaza from banned Islamist organisation Interpal.
Called Ibrahim Hewitt, extremist and chair of Interpal, a “very good friend”.
Accepted two more trips from the pro-Hamas group PRC.
Speaker at conference hosted by pro-Hamas group MEMO.
Met Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh several times.
Hosted meeting with Mousa Abu Maria of banned group Islamic Jihad.
Patron of Palestine Solidarity Campaign – marches attended by Hezbollah.
Compared Israel to ISIS, Hamas, Hezbollah and al-Qaeda.
Said we should not make “value judgements” about Britons who fight for ISIS.
Received endorsement from Hamas.
Attended event with Islamic extremist Suliman Gani.
Chaired Stop the War, who praised “internationalism and solidarity” of ISIS.
Praised Raed Salah, who was jailed for inciting violence in Israel.
Signed letter defending jihadist advocacy group Cage.
Met Dyab Jahjah, who praised the killing of British soldiers.
Shared platform with representative of extremist cleric Muqtada al-Sadr.
Compared ISIS to US military in interview on Russia Today.
Opposed proscription of Hizb ut-Tahrir.
Attended conference which called on Iraqis to kill British soldiers.
Attended Al-Quds Day demonstration in support of destruction of Israel.
Supported Hamas and ISIS-linked Viva Palestina group.
Attended protest with Islamic extremist Moazzam Begg.
Made the “case for Iran” at event hosted by Khomeinist group.
Photographed smiling with Azzam Tamimi, who backed suicide bombings.
Photographed with Abdel Atwan, who sympathised with attacks on US troops.
Said Hamas should “have tea with the Queen”.
Attended ‘Meet the Resistance’ event with Hezbollah MP Hussein El Haj.
Attended event with Haifa Zangana, who praised Palestinian “mujahideen”.
Defended the infamous anti-Semitic Hamas supporter Stephen Sizer.
Attended event with pro-Hamas and Hezbollah group Naturei Karta.
Backed Holocaust denying anti-Zionist extremist Paul Eisen.
Photographed with Abdul Raoof Al Shayeb, later jailed for terror offences.
Mocked “anti-terror hysteria” while opposing powers for security services.
Named on speakers list for conference with Hamas sympathiser Ismail Patel.
Criticised drone strike that killed Jihadi John.
Said the 7/7 bombers had been denied “hope and opportunity”.
Said 9/11 was “manipulated” to make it look like bin Laden was responsible.
Failed to unequivocally condemn the 9/11 attacks.
Called Columbian terror group M-19 “comrades”.
Blamed beheading of Alan Henning on Britain.
Gave speech in support of Gaddafi regime.
Signed EDM spinning for Slobodan Milosevic.
Blamed Tunisia terror attack on “austerity”.
Voted against banning support for the IRA.
Voted against the Prevention of Terrorism Act three times during the Troubles.
Voted against emergency counter-terror laws after 9/11.
Voted against stricter punishments for being a member of a terror group.
Voted against criminalising the encouragement of terrorism.
Voted against banning al-Qaeda.
Voted against outlawing the glorification of terror.
Voted against control orders.
Voted against increased funding for the security services to combat terrorism.
Today I’d like to introduce you to 21-year-old Sheareem Cookhorn and 18-year-old Tyrell Graham. Fine-looking chaps aren’t they? And a huge benefit to our diverse, vibrant, multi-cultural society:
I don’t remember which is which and really don’t care. The thing I do care about is why these two (IMHO) utterly worthless pieces of sh*t were ever born in the first place.
These two pieces of garbage have just been convicted of murdering 19-year-old Kamali Gabbidon-Lynck (probably also a worthless excrement) and attempting to murder an unnamed 20-year-old (probably scum as well), with Cookhorn also convicted for possession of a firearm with intent. Three 17-year-olds, who cannot be named for legal reasons, were also convicted of murder for Gabbidon-Lynck’s murder, and of section 18 grievous bodily harm in connection with the gang’s second victim.
“On the night of the murder, the group of seven males, including the five defendants and two unknown individuals set off on bicycles… to search for suspected rival gang members,” an official statement from the Metropolitan Police recalled.
“Such was their violent intent, that between the five defendants they carried at least five knives (including a machete and a small sword), a handgun and a shotgun,” the statement continued, describing how Cookhorn opened fire on the victims and two others upon finding them in Lordship Lane near a Vue cinema complex.”
Apparently the attack was due to what the police called a “postcode rivalry”. I guess the scumbags were fighting over drug-dealing territory. After the attack, the attackers posted so-called “drill videos” boasting of their ‘success’.
I imagine the grandparents of these pieces of trash came to Britain and worked in menial jobs maybe in factories or cleaning hospitals. Probably they were religious Christians who worked hard and tried to make a decent life for themselves and their families. But within just a couple of generations, in spite of having all the advantages of living in an advanced, Western democracy with things like free education and free healthcare, their families had only produced violent, low-IQ, socially-worthless pieces of sh*t.
Probably all these pieces of excrement went to school for ten years, learning absolutely nothing. Most likely they spent their school years doing everything they could to humiliate and destroy the education of those children who did actually want to learn and improve their lives.
This is apparently why our parents’ and grandparents’ generations fought in two world wars – so that those a cynic might consider to be Third-world faeces could pour into our once great country causing havoc and destroying everything they touched.
These scum seem to be the rule, rather than the exception, in the housing estates of London Mayor Khan’s vibrant, diverse, multi-cultural paradise.
But I can assure you bruv, diversity ain’t no strenf!
(and here, for those who haven’t seen it is my Youtube video – Khan’s Bloodsoaked Streets of London)
SomayyehShahbaziJahrouii, 33, had been imprisoned for six years. She had committed murder in self-defense against rape, according to her relatives.
SomayyehShahbaziJahrouii was hanged at dawn on Wednesday, December 4, 2019, in Sepidar Prison of Ahvaz, capital of Khuzestan Province.
Her death brings to 98 the number of women executed by Iran’s regime since supposedly ‘moderate’ Hassan Rouhani took office as President in 2013:
Iran’s regime is the world’s top executioner of women. So far in 2019, it has executed at least 11 women, more than it had done in previous years. It had executed at least six women in 2018, ten in 2017 and nine in 2016. So Iran is hoisting almost one woman per month – odd that we haven’t heard a peep of protest from Western woke feminists.
The Iranian regime has executed at least 4,000 people under Rouhani. That’s almost two people a day. Odd that we haven’t heard a peep of protest from the holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling progressive libtards.
Some people believe that it’s because of the Iranian regime’s failure to categorize deliberate murders according to their degree, anyone convicted of murder in Iran is sentenced to death, regardless of their motives. Many of the women convicted of murder in Iran are themselves victims of violence against women and have committed the murders in self-defense. Though I suspect that anyone criticising the crazy old men who run the country or even anyone who accidentally farts in the direction of Mecca gets the hangman’s rope.
But Iran isn’t the only country where the crowds enjoy the sight of women swinging from the gallows:
I’ve been trying to think what Iran and Pakistan have in common such that both countries like a good female hanging. But I just can’t quite put my finger on it.
Anyway – back to Iran. Perhaps the Iranian Tourist Authority should have a new slogan:
Want to see what life was like 2,000 years ago? Visit Iran.
In Britain, nobody would dare poke fun at the Religion of Fabulousness. If they did, they’d risk arrest and prosecution for supposed ‘hate speech’ and might even get killed.
But somewhere floating around cyberspace is this short (2 minutes) video of someone actually daring to have a laugh at our Izlumic friends. It’s not brilliant. But it is rare. You won’t find many comedians still alive who have dared have a little chuckle at our Izlumic friends’ expense.
I know that the vast majority of British people value the vibrant, diverse, multi-cultural enrichment that mass, uncontrolled Third-world immigration brings our once great country:
Therefore, I’m pleased to bring yet another heartwarming story of how our ethnic minorities (which may soon be a majority) have improved life for us previously boring, mono-cultural Brits:
A 12-year-old girl was “passed around like a piece of meat” as she was sold for sex and humiliated by a group of men, a court heard on Monday 2 December 2019. The child was allegedly made to perform sex acts in a churchyard, raped above a shop on a filthy mattress and abused when she tried to refuse their advances.
A court heard how the victim was urinated on by one of the five men. The offences are said to have taken place in and around Telford, Shropshire, and went on for some years. The alleged victim is now an adult, Birmingham Crown Court was told.
Michelle Heeley QC, prosecuting, said: “This case involves the sexual exploitation of a young girl, a girl passed around like a piece of meat for the sexual gratification of several young men, some of whom are in the dock. Each of these defendants deny that they in any way abused anyone. The prosecution say, having heard the evidence, you can be sure they did. She was befriended at a time when she was low, by a man called Tanveer Ahmed.“
Ahmed worked making takeaway deliveries for Perfect Pizza in the town, with jurors told the location was relevant, as the alleged victim claimed she was assaulted above the shop. The jury heard Ahmed was not on trial alongside the other five defendants, having been deported to Pakistan for other “unrelated offences”.
After “befriending” the young girl, it was alleged Ahmed started forcing her to perform sex acts with other men. Ms Heeley said: “One night he drove her to a flat above a shop, he took her into a room where there were three older men, and he told her she had to have sex with these men. She did not want to have sex but she was forced to, she was pushed down on to an old dirty mattress, and raped”.
“She saw money exchange hands. Sadly for her, this did not happen just once, but on other occasions, when she was spat on and raped – all orchestrated by Tanveer Ahmed. He himself forced her to perform oral sex on him, and if she refused he would call her a slag, slap her and leave her stranded in random areas in Telford”.
Ahmed continued “selling her” for sex, including passing her details on to men, the prosecution said. Jurors heard this is how the girl came into contact with the first defendant, Mohammed Ali Sultan, 33, formerly of Telford.
Ali Sultan is facing four charges of indecent assault and one of rape. Jurors were told: “Ali Sultan would take her to meet other men, in the same way Tanveer Ahmed had, men would phone her and Ali Sultan and Tanveer Ahmed would make her answer, and do what the men wanted. The abuse took place at a number of locations, including above Perfect Pizza and in a churchyard in Wellington, amongst others. Ali Sultan would verbally abuse her, calling her a sl**, and on occasions slap her, or pull her hair.“
On a later occasion he allegedly raped her, coercing her into repeatedly meeting up by threatening to tell people at her school what she was doing. Ali Sultan is also charged in connection with a third incident, at the churchyard, when he allegedly became violent after she refused his advances. The jury of six men and six women were told he already had convictions in both 2012 and 2015 for “similar offences against young girls”.
Another of the alleged victim’s alleged abusers is 38-year-old Amjad Hussain, of Telford, who is accused of forcing her to perform oral sex on two separate occasions.
A third man, 35-year-old Shafiq Younas, from Wellington, is accused of orally raping the youngster in the same churchyard in Wellington.
Another male, Nazam Akhtar, of Wellington, has been charged with rape, in an incident in which the girl was allegedly driven to a lane in a car along with Ali Sultan, Hussain, and another male. It is alleged that after the rape, Akhtar, 35, urinated on the girl in an act of humiliation.
Also on trial is Mohammad Rizwan, of Telford, who jurors heard also worked at Perfect Pizza and allegedly forced the girl to perform sex acts and is facing two charges of indecent assault
Prosecutors claimed 37-year-old Rizwan, who will tell jurors he had a consensual sexual relationship with the victim, saved the girl’s phone number under the contact name “blowjob2”. The jury were told Rizwan will claim in his defence he and the victim had a consensual relationship, when she was aged 17.
The men deny any wrongdoing and the trial continues.
After doing this blog, I thought I’d check whether the BBC or the Guardian had covered this story. So I Googled. And, while I couldn’t find this story on either the BBC or the Guardian, I did find stories of other 12-year-old girls being repeatedly raped by groups of men over several years – for example, a girl in Manchester seems to have been similarly multi-culturally enriched by a gang of men of foreign heritage. And, of course, there were tens of thousands of other teenage (usually under-age) girls given similar enrichment by large groups of men with slightly foreign-sounding names.
At this point there’s cartoon I’d like to show. But I cannot for fear of being hauled in by Plod for some made-up offense or other. That would be the same Plod who conspired with politicians and social services to cover up the most appalling abuse of tens of thousands of under-age British girls for decades in towns across Britain.
What a wonderful country we have become where those who commit such crimes usually get a nod and a wink from Plod. But anyone mentioning what is happening risks persecution and prosecution.
I’m afraid my website was down for a few hours yesterday. For anyone who wants to know what I mean by “kissing the snake”, please just see yesterday’s blog about The Snake
Mark Steyn’s article
Here’s a large part of an article written by Mark Steyn commenting on the latest London Bridge terror attack:
Usman Khan, a “British man” as the media instruct us to think of him, was a convicted terrorist, tried and jailed for his part in a plot to blow up the London Stock Exchange. In 2013, he was sentenced to sixteen years in prison, and the judge ordered him to serve at least eight.
Which seems fair enough, since it would be prudent for a city as dependent on “financial services” as London to disincentivize the detonation of the Stock Exchange.
Yet here we are, and six years later Usman Khan is out of his cell on something called “license”, which is a type of probation. But don’t worry: he had to wear an electronic ankle tag, just like Adel Kermiche was wearing when he decapitated Père Hamel during Mass at his church in Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray. (I attended the funeral in Rouens Cathedral, a bleak affair.) As Mr Khan was known to be eager to blow up London landmarks, a condition of his “license” was that he was forbidden to visit Britain’s capital.
So how did he get to be there on Friday? Ah, well, he’d asked to attend the fifth-anniversary celebrations for Cambridge University’s “prison rehabilitation” programme, “Learning Together” – which exists to “bring together people in criminal justice and higher education institutions to study alongside each other in inclusive and transformative learning communities”. And the authorities seem to have been flattered by Mr Khan’s interest in their event, so granted him a one-day exemption to visit the capital.
Then the identities of the dead emerged. Jack Merritt was a 25-year-old Cambridge criminology graduate and an administrator of the “Learning Together” programme. He had written the dissertation for his Doctorate of Philosophy on the “over-representation” in the British prison system of young ethnic-minority males, such as Usman Khan. He had apparently donated to a charity fun run by two Cambridge professors that raised money to buy a laptop for Usman Khan. Usman Khan used that laptop to explore his continuing-education interest in global jihad, and then he asked permission to go to Fishmongers’ Hall in London to attend the “Learning Together” anniversary event. Jack Merritt saw Usman Khan as his friend, proof of the validity of his thesis, a testament to the success of the programme. Usman Khan saw Jack Merritt as the other, the infidel. So he killed him.
There will be empty chairs round the Christmas table in two English households now and forever. And it behooves us to be sympathetic to and indulgent of those whose grief takes incoherent forms. As Laura Rosen Cohen noted, Jack Merrit’s father reacted to his son’s murder by Tweeting that:“my son was a beautiful spirit who took the side of the underdog”.
Dave Merritt was mourning his son, and seeking to give his lost life some kind of meaning. He was then invited to write a column for the Guardian: “Jack would be livid his death has been used to further an agenda of hate.”
Why is it necessary for Merritt Sr to damn those who disagree with him and his late son as “furthering an agenda of hate”? Why couldn’t it just be a public policy dispute – about cautious and responsible approaches to crime, immigration, social tranquillity, multiculturalism?
If anything can be said for certain about Jack Merritt’s short life, it’s that in the end he wasn’t terribly good at recognizing who the real “haters” are. Nor is his father, who seems to think they’re Nigel and Boris, Tories, “Islamophobes”. So who actually is the hater here? If you happen to think that bollards and de-radicalization programmes are insufficient to the situation, Dave Merritt will label your difference of opinion as “an agenda of hate”. Which is one reason why the bollardization of everything is all we get.
The determination to denounce everything other than diversity blather as an “agenda of hate” is a big part of why we’re where we are today. We need a broader conversation than Dave Merritt seems willing to permit, which means there will be more Jack Merritts.
As I wrote two years ago:
There is also a tragic, suicidal and sacrificial quality to our diversity stupidity: “‘We took him in as if he were a son,’ the girl’s father said, according to the Bild tabloid newspaper. He has lost his only daughter. She was stabbed and killed by her former boyfriend, an unaccompanied refugee from Afghanistan.”
And there is also a decadence to our stupidity. When Maria Ladenburger was raped and murdered by another fake “child migrant” from Afghanistan, her father, a senior official at the European Commission, asked for donations to be made in her memory to a “refugee charity”.
I hear echoes of poor Maria Ladenburger’s case in the reactions to other recent killings: we are tiptoeing very close to conscious child sacrifice in the cause of “diversity”.
Against that must be set the bravery of those who fought back. That is a well-told tale, even if it winds up like a jihadist version of the end of The Benny Hill Show: the Allahu-Akbar guy pursued doggedly by men wielding fire extinguishers and narwhal tusks and anything else they can grab. We cherish such stories because, ever since Flight 93 on 9/11, they have been the only good news of the day.
But they are not enough, not in a world where all the people who matter think like The Guardian, Dave Merritt, Cambridge University, or Cressida Dick, the head honcho of Scotland Yard, who denounced the terrorist act as (all together now) “senseless”. Au contraire, if you share the worldview of Usman Khan, as millions do, his actions make perfect sense. What’s truly senseless is our reaction to them.
For example, when the TV conversation veered away from the multicultural twaddle it was only to query whether this showed Isis were still actively in the game, notwithstanding al-Baghdadi sleeping with the virgins. Isis is a symptom, not the disease – merely the most recent flag of convenience for the great enduring jihad. At the dawn of the century, it was al-Qaeda. By 2030, it will be something else. But the idea that what we’re facing depends on some Isis high command trained at Isis staff colleges is as “senseless” as anything else.
In the early hours of December 13th, one of two men will become the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister: on the one hand, Jeremy Corbyn, a man whose sympathies his entire adult life have lain with terrorists, whether Irish Republican or Islamic, and who is all for early release for persons he doesn’t think should be banged up in the first place; and on the other, Boris Johnson, whose party talks tough on crime, immigration, terrorism and everything else, but under whose showboating butchness nothing ever changes.
Usman Khan was an ill-educated fanatic, but, up against all the sophisticated stupidity of the elites, he figured that out at least.
Yesterday, we had all the usual hypocrisy from our useless, craven, Izlumophiliac ruling elites – solemn reflection, candle-lit vigils, interdenominational services featuring (of course) a preacher from the religion of peacefulness and politicians blethering about how Britain will never give in to terrorism. And, of course, we had cynical, lying journalists desperately bigging up the fact that it was a foreigner and two former convicts who tackled the Jihadi while the same journalists equally desperately played down the attacker’s religion and motives.
But amidst all the wailing and hand-wringing and increasingly ridiculous claims that “diversity is our strength”, I’d like to remind readers of a song that (I believe) perfectly encapsulates how we’re committing suicide by inviting into our country millions who hate us, hate our freedoms, hate our culture, envy our scientific and economic success and want to destroy everything we have achieved to turn our continent into the hell-holes from which they’ve come:
So, here’s a message to all those liberal, progressive, virtue-signalling, bleeding-heart, hug-a-jihadi libtards who think that West-hating, democracy-loathing, violent, usually inbred, usually low-IQ maniacs can be transformed into nice, friendly productive citizens:
On her way to work one morning Down the path along side the lake A tender-hearted woman saw a poor half-frozen jihadi snake His pretty colored skin had been all frosted with the dew “Poor thing“ she cried, “I’ll take you in and I’ll take care of you” “Take me in tender woman Take me in, for heaven’s sake Take me in, tender woman“, sighed the jihadi snake
She wrapped him up all cozy in a comforter of silk And laid him by her fireside with some honey and some milk She hurried home from work that night and soon as she arrived She found that jihadi snake she’d taken to had been revived “Take me in, tender woman Take me in, for heaven’s sake Take me in, tender woman”, sighed the jihadi snake
She clutched him to her bosom, “You’re so beautiful”she cried “But if I hadn’t brought you in by now you might have died” She stroked his jihadi skin again and kissed and held him tight Instead of saying thanks, the jihadi snake gave her a vicious bite “Take me in, tender woman Take me in, for heaven’s sake Take me in, tender woman” sighed the jihadi snake
“I saved you” cried the woman “And you’ve bitten me, but why? You know your bite is poisonous and now I’m going to die” “Oh shut up, silly woman” said the jihadi with a grin “You knew damn well I was a jihadi snake before you took me in “Take me in, tender woman Take me in, for heaven’s sake Take me in, tender woman” sighed the jihadi snake
Here’s the original song (with a great piece of drumming in the intro). Enjoy:
I thought I’d start the week with a bit of light entertainment. We all need a bit of cheering up every now and then.
But before I do, I’m really excited because I’ve realised that I can predict the future:
I can predict the future
We all saw yet another wonderful episode of multi-cultural enrichment which happened on London Bridge last week thanks to a valuable member of British society doing what he does best:
And now questions are being asked about why this piece of sh*t was allowed out of prison a year before he had served even half his 16-years sentence.
Well, I predict our rulers will promise “a full and thorough investigation” which will “leave no stone unturned” and which will result in us being assured that “important lessons have been learnt”. Then nothing will change and we’ll continue abasing ourselves to those who hate us and want to kill us to show how liberal and progressive and diverse and multi-cultural we are. Meanwhile, all those responsible for letting this subhuman excrement out to kill innocent people will be promoted out of trouble keeping their generous public-sector salaries and even more generous public-sector pensions.
I also predict that the (IMHO) utterly useless, always politically-correct top cop Neil Basu, Assistant Commissioner for the Metropolitan Police (and the dismal Cressida Dickless Dick’s sidekick) will continue to claim that supposed ‘right-wing’ terrorism is “the fastest growing threat” to the British public even though there haven’t actually been any ‘right-wing’ terrorist attacks.
How’s that for predicting the future?
Lying scum liars lies and lies and lies and ……
And, now for some light entertainment. Here are some of our rulers promising to abide by the result of the 2016 EU Referendum.
This video should be played every time a politician is interviewed on TV. But strangely, the promises given in this video are never mentioned by the UK-hating, EU-loving, biased BBC and C4 News.
We now know that the London knifeman was 28-year-old Usman Khan. (Any relation to London Mayor Sadiq Khan?) Mr Khan, that’s Usman not Sadiq, was well-known to the police. He was arrested with eight other men in 2012 after plotting to bomb the London Stock Exchange and build a terrorist training camp. He was ordered to serve at least eight years in prison.
But it seems he was released early as he was “no longer a danger to the public”.
Usman lived in Staffordshire but came to London for a prisoner rehabilitation conference. Good grief!!!!!
I wonder if our (IMHO) UK-hating, terrorist-loving, commie-of-the-year Jeremy Corbyn will be criticising the police for shooting poor innocent Usman instead of arresting Usman, giving him loads of benefits, psychological counselling and sending wonderful multi-culturally-enriching Usman on a de-radicalisation course at taxpayers’ expense?
I hope the relations of those killed by Mr Khan sue the Home Office for millions for the Home Office’s Izlumophiliac submission to the lefty scumbags (including senior police officers) who keep claiming that the greatest terrorist threat to Britain comes from the Far Right and not our friends from our favourite religion.
Climate breakdown is the greatest threat blah blah blah..
I’m afraid I couldn’t bring myself to watch Thursday night’s C4 supposed debate on supposed Climate Emergency as I believe that the whole thing is a massive hoax with absolutely no scientific basis at all. And what kind of madness has taken control of us when political leaders are dragged onto TV to debate something that isn’t actually happening?
In a blog I wrote in 2013, I explained how the claim that “98% of scientists” agree that human activity is responsible for Global Warming is a total lie based on ludicrous manipulation of the data. And I showed how the eco-liars had manipulated the results to come up with their “98% of scientists” figure. The real figure, in case you’re interested, is about 7.3% of scientists (if I remember correctly).
What I wasn’t aware of at the time was that a year earlier, in 2012, some real scientists had actually dared question the hyperventilating alarmists’ claims of impending global catastrophe due to increasing CO2 in the atmosphere. I guess neither I nor many other people knew about this as it (strangely?) wasn’t widely reported in the mainstream media.
We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS, that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled
The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is unbecoming of NASA’s history of making an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements.
As former NASA employees, we feel that NASA’s advocacy of an extreme position, prior to a thorough study of the possible overwhelming impact of natural climate drivers is inappropriate. We request that NASA refrain from including unproven and unsupported remarks in its future releases and websites on this subject. At risk is damage to the exemplary reputation of NASA, NASA’s current or former scientists and employees, and even the reputation of science itself.
The group featured some famous names, including Michael F. Collins, Walter Cunningham and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.
The letter included a request for NASA to refrain from mentioning CO2 as a cause of global warming in future press releases and websites. The agency’s “Global Climate Change” webpage says that “Humans have increased atmospheric CO2 concentration by a third since the Industrial Revolution began”.
But, of course, no scientist or academic would dare mention this letter or dare question the Man-Made Global Warming cult nowadays as any such supposed ‘heresy’ and crime against political correctness would result in excoriation, public humiliation, career destruction and expulsion from whatever institute they worked at.
Poles poleaxe multi-cultural enricher
And while we’re on the subject of our craven submission to the dictatorship of political correctness, here’s a wonderful short (15 seconds) video from Poland in which a Polish lorry driver and his mate fail to show the required deference to an African enricher.
David Craig, on December 13th, 2019
