In my Thursday blog I quoted a number of political party leaders demanding a General Election after the ruling Tories changed their party leader and thus our prime minister. These lying, blethering, self-serving, wothless, greedy, hypocritical scum ( sorry, of course I meant ‘these noble, self-sacrificing public servants‘) all stressed how important it was for our democracy that a change of prime minister should always lead to a General Election.
All the quotes I used yesterday came from an article on the BBC website in October 2022 just after Liz ‘lettuce’ Truss’s resignation as prime minister.
If you watch the BBC, you’ll have been bombarded by ‘ads’ by the BBC about how brilliant their BBC Verify operation is and you’ll have seen over and over and over and over again clips like the one below in which the BBC boasts of itself as a champion of the truth:
So, now that the BBC has verified quotes from the main party leaders about how important it was to defend democracy by having a General Election each time a party changes prime minister, will our courageous BBC truth warriors be asking our politicians – particularly Labour MPs and ministers – why they have suddenly changed their minds and no longer feel it is important to defend democracy by having an election when Starmer is replaced?
Please don’t hold your breath as I wouldn’t want to be held responsible for any injuries caused by this blog.
As I wrote yesterday, here’s the real reason our mainstream political party politicians are now somewhat less enthusiastic than before about defending democracy by having a General Election:
If there was a new General Election, I believe Labour would win but with a much reduced majority. However, there would be a massive increase in the number of seats won by Nigel Farage’s and Richard Tice’s Reform – possibly winning as many as 100 to 150 seats and replacing the Tories as the main opposition party. This would mean a large number of Labour, LibDem and Tory MPs losing their well-paid jobs, almost unlimited expense accounts and unbelievably generous pensions.
And that’s not something the main party leaders would want. So there will be no General Election and a political coup will give Britain’s most anti-British socialist government so much power to crush free speech, arrest its opponents and gerrymander the electoral system so that there may never be a British patriotic government ever again.
As for the UK-hating, lefty, truth-allergic BBC, don’t expect them to embarrass our rulers by asking them why they have lost interest in defending democracy when Labour changes leader and thus prime minister, when this was apparently so important when the Tories did it.
On 21 October 2022, after Liz Truss’s resignation as prime minister, the other parties howled about the need to defend democracy and demanded a General Election.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer called for an immediate general election following the resignation of the prime minister. Sir Keir said the country “cannot have another experiment at the top of the Tory party“. Sir Keir said: “This is not just a soap opera at the top of the Tory party – it’s doing huge damage to the reputation of our country. We need a general election so the public can have their say on this utter chaos.”
The beloved ‘Sir’ Keir also claimed his party was ready for government: “There’s a manifesto that is going to be ready whenever an election is called,” Sir Keir told the BBC: “I’ve had a team working on that. I’ve had a team working on general election preparedness. We’ve moved our teams on to a general election footing. We’re very, very prepared should there be a general election.”
The Liberal Democrats, the SNP. Plaid Cymru and the Green Party also called for an immediate general election.
Scotland’s first minister – the Sturgeon creature who had no idea her husband was stealing over £400,000 from the SNP to buy amongst other things hair care products unusual for a bald man – said a UK general election is a “democratic imperative” following the resignation of the prime minister. “This is an almighty mess, and it is people the length and breadth of the UK who are paying the price of this,” she told the BBC “Fundamentally the UK now needs to have a democratic choice over its next prime minister.”
Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said: “We do not need another Conservative prime minister lurching from crisis to crisis, we need a general election. It is time for Conservative MPs to do their patriotic duty, put the country first and give the people a say.”
But as Starmer fades into well-deserved obscurity while the Manchester Messiah continues his victorious march towards Number 10 Downing Street, suddenly, the other party leaders seem to have lost their enthusiasm for another General Election and their commitment to protecting democracy.
Why? If there was a new General Election, I believe Labour would win but with a much reduced majority. However, there would be a massive increase in the number of seats won by Nigel Farage’s and Richard Tice’s Reform – possibly winning as many as 100 to 150 seats. This would mean a large number of Labour, LibDem and Tory MPs losing their well-paid jobs and almost unlimited expense accounts.
And that’s not something the main party leaders would want. So there will be no General Election and a political coup will give Britain’s most anti-British socialist government so much power to crush free speech, arrest its opponents and gerrymander the electoral system so that there may never be a British patriotic government ever again.
This hypocrisy hopefully exposes our MPs for what they really are – selfish, greedy, lying, self-serving, grifting scum who would say and do anything just to cling on to their lousy jobs, bountiful expense accounts and massive pensions. Total garbage, all of them.
Why did ‘successful’ Sir Keir resign?
Apparently tearful knight of the realm – Two-Tier Keir – gave a blubbing resignation speech in which he tried to big up his many supposed ‘successes’. I didn’t watch it as the sooner that (IMHO) thin-skinned, free-speech-loathing, UK-hating, Davos-loving, migrant-hugging, Islamophiliac, lying empty suit of a man disappears from my life the better.
However, if Two-Tier was so ‘successful’ why did he feel the need to resign. It’s all very confusing!
Hopefully some readers have survived the kind of supposedly ‘deadly’ heat many of us spend thousands of pounds each year to travel to countries like Spain and Thailand to experience.
Useless workshy plods?
A few months ago I came across a man lying face down in the water on a Thailand beach. I got help (drowned people are very heavy) to pull him onto the beach and then we tried CPR. But he was already well and truly dead so there was nothing we could do:
Following that I consulted Professor Google and learnt that:
Permanent brain damage can begin in as little as four to six minutes without oxygen after the heart stops beating. Because the brain is highly dependent on a continuous supply of oxygenated blood, the timeline for damage advances rapidly as the deprivation continues after a heart stops
A person can generally be resuscitated for up to 10 minutes after their heart stops without sustaining severe, irreversible brain damage, assuming CPR is started immediately. Without CPR or defibrillation, survival drops sharply after 8 to 10 minutes
That brings me to a sad event at my local beach a couple of days ago. I was doing my usual 7-mile walk and noticed a rescue helicopter circling the beach three times before landing. As I got closer I saw a crowd of people grouped around a body while one person was frantically pumping away doing CPR. I estimated that about 4-5 minutes had passed since I noticed the helicopter ambulance. Given the time it would have taken for the rescue helicopter to reach the scene, it must have been more than 10 minutes since the person had been pulled from the sea. Getting even closer I saw there was one police car and a regular ambulance in addition to the rescue helicopter:
Apparently a woman had been pulled from the water and they were now trying to resusitate her.
I’m not normally a rubber-necking gawper. But having had the experience of trying to save a drowned man in Thailand, I hung around interested in how the situation would be handled.
At probably 10 minutes (so at least 15 minutes since the woman was pulled from the water) another ambulance and another police car arrived. Then at more than 15 minutes (perhaps 20 minutes since the drowning), a police van with no fewer than three of our useless local plods turned up. By then it would have been more than clear to the crews of the two ambulances already there, to the two cars of plods already there, to the lifeguards already there and to the crew of the rescue helicopter already there that the drowned woman was beyond rescue:
Quite what the three plods arriving on the scene so late hoped to achieve is a mystery to me. But the drowning seemed to attract quite a crowd of supposed ‘rescuers’.
Of course, when someone is in trouble, we must do our best to help them. But two ambulances, one rescue helicopter, three police vehicles with seven plods and several lifeguards seemed to me to be a bit of overkill. It seems extraordinary to me that, at a time when the police and NHS bleat and moan about not having enough money, they can devote so many resources to just one drowned person, especially when most of the ‘courageous’ rescuers arrived too late to be of any use anyway. Perhaps the NHS and plods aren’t quite as cash-strapped or even as ‘overwhelmed’ as they continually claim?
I’m afraid I was dumbstruck by two (IMHO) ghastly events last week:
Trump’s abject surrender to the Islamist murderers in the Iran conflict
the scale of the Manchester Messiah’s victory mainly due to the (IMHO) irredemiable stupidity of Makerfield’s (particularly female) voters.
Both these events will have massive consequences for our future.
Trump’s appeaasement of and capitulation to the Islamists
What to say? There is only one solution to the evils Iran’s Islamists inflict on the world – the replacement of the Islamist regime with a more psychologically-balanced government. From what little I understand, much of the Iranian population is reasonably well-educated and are not mouthfrothing anti-West fanatics slavering over the destruction of Israel and the Islamist conquest of the West. But for 47 years, Iran has been ruled by a bunch of murderous, unhinged religious zealots who have used the country’s massive wealth to foment attacks on Israel and terrorism around the world while impoverishing and brutally oppressing their own people.
Iran’s armed forces number over 800,000 while the IRGC have only about 125,000 troops. Moreover, there must be millions of Iranian men who have some military experience from having served in the armed forces. The US/Israeli attacks gave Iranians a once-in-a-lifetime chance the throw out the Islamists and install a government which prioritised the Iranian people. We had a once-in-a-lifetime chance to have peace in the Middle East. The Iranian people chose to not seize that opportunity. The Islamists now know there is no effective opposition to their barbaric occupation of Iran. In fact, their resilience in the face of the US/Israeli attacks have probably strengthened the Islamists’ grip on power. So now we are faced with a humiliation of America and Israel and a MIddle East war which will continue for another half century or more.
What a disaster!
The Mancester Messiah’s Makerfield ‘triumph’
The votes have been counted. The result is clear. The Manchester Messiah – Andrew Burnham – took Makerfield with 54.8% of the vote and a majority of 9,231, on a turnout of 58.7%, the highest at any parliamentary by-election in almost seven years. Labour’s lead over Reform UK, 13 points at the general election, widened to 20. A seat Reform had swept only weeks before, taking all eight of its wards in the May locals on close to half the vote, delivered a thumping Labour win.
Of course, part of the Labour vote was comprised of people voting for the shape-shifting Burnham to get rid of the (IMHO) useless, lying, incompetent, UK-hating, Davos-adoring, UN-worshipping, migrant-hugging, two-tier Keir ‘stoma-bag’ Starmer. But the vote also suggests that, while a party like Reform may gain a large number of parliamentary seats in the next General Election, a supposedly ‘progressive’ alliance of Labour, LibDems and Greens are likely to form the next government and the government after that and the government after that ………
After all, Labour will change the electoral system before the next General Election by, for example, extending the vote to 16- and -17-year-olds and maybe replacing ‘first-past-the-post’, (assuming Labour even allow us another General Election) to ensure Reform never gets anywhere near power. Moreover, Labour will probably grant an amnesty to several million illegal, often uneducated, often unemployable, sometimes criminal, sometimes rape-obsessed Third-world migrants claiming that this will ‘help the economy’ or be ‘more fair’ or some suchlike nonsense, just as Spain has done. This will add several million more Labour voters to the electoral register and encourage millions more to make the totally safe journey across the English Channel to be ferried in comfort to four-star hotels in Britain by Britain’s useless Border Farce and the (IMHO) anti-British, UK-loathing RNLI.
Yippeee, even more Labour voters!
Just these two events have led me to think that last week was the week which I wish wasn’t.
Hopefully you all read my previous blog in which the judge informed us that, after stabbing Novak several times, his Sikh murderer seems to have taken pleasure in filming Novak as he crawled away fatally infjured in an attempt to flee his murderer.
Time to bring back the death penalty?
Makerfield’s men and women
As millions of words from real and self-appointed pundits have pointed out, on Thursday Makerfield’s 76,845 voters are about to decide if Britain gets ruined by our useless, UK-hating, migrant-hugging, worker-loathing, benefits-scroungers-loving, Islamophiliac, rapist-protecting incompetents in the Labour Party which no longer represents workers. Or whether the Manchester Messiah, the over-entitled ‘King of the North – Andrew Burnham – is given a bloody nose and (hopefully) disappears from our lives.
The omens (polls) are not great. It seems like Makerfield’s female voters are likely to carry the (IMHO) repulsive, shape-shifting Burnham back to Westminster and then into 10 Downing Street:
Around 53% of Makerfield’s females seem to prefer Burnham to Reform. But only 43% of Makerfield’s men look to be voting for reform. Oh dear. It seems we may be doomed.
Perhaps, even more horrific than the Manchester Messiah becoming Prime Minister is the likelihood that the (IMHO) deranged, scientifically-challenged, recidivist-lying climate zealot Ed Miliband may become our next Chancellor.
Dear women of Makerfiled, please don’t destroy our once great country. Please come to your senses before it is too late.
I couldn’t write a blog yesterday as the ‘wonderful’ security system protecting my website wouldn’t let me in to my own website.
The true horror of the Sikh slaughter of Henry Novak
We all know many of the details of the murder of white teenager Henry Novak and the way the murderer’s family tried to protect the murderer. But I’m not sure any national newspaper actually revealed in detail the true horror of the murder. For that, we have to go to the judge’s summing up:
Not long after 11pm on 3/12/2025, Henry Nowak was walking back to his university accommodation in Portswood, Southampton after an evening out. His route took him north along Belmont Road and he was approaching a junction with St Denys Road where you lived with your family. Henry was not drunk but may have been affected a little by the small amount of alcohol he had consumed over the previous few hours. He was not a regular drinker and did not generally drink to excess. His blood alcohol level at the time of his death was below the legal limit for driving. He was alone and unarmed. You happened to be walking south along Belmont Road on the same pavement. It was to be a chance meeting.
You were sober but were carrying a large Sikh dagger in a sheath attached to a belt over the outside of your clothing.
You drew the dagger from its sheath and, as the jury was sure, you deliberately stabbed Henry in the chest with it. The knife passed through, several layers of clothing, as demonstrated by the multiple slits in his dark top where the material had been overlaid on itself in the struggle and the single slit in his shirt. It passed upwards through soft tissue, between the two uppermost ribs, catching a lung and cutting an important vein, behind the collar bone. This was to a depth of 8cm from the skin surface. The consequent bleeding flowed into his chest cavity.
The pathologist, Amanda Jeffrey, found 1200 ml, or over 2 pints, of blood there. She said that no emergency medical treatment would have permitted access to the bleeding vein. In simple terms, he would not have survived, however quickly he received first aid, CPR or expert medical treatment.
You also stabbed him twice to the upper leg at some point and once again to the lower abdomen/groin area at the front. The latter only resulted in a knife tip injury; the former were both to a substantial depth although not as deep as the chest wound. Henry’s face was also slashed with the blade of the dagger but I cannot be sure that was aimed or intended. However, one or more of the four stabs must have had an immediate effect as Henry was never able to put up his hands to defend himself from further serious injury. He was defenceless.
Your brother, Gurpreet, arrived on the scene very shortly after your attack had finished. You then filmed Henry desperately trying to get away from you, somehow scaling a fence, onto a communal bin, before landing on a car in front of the property next door. Bloodstains show that he had got one, more or all his injuries before then.
You then showed a callous disregard for his wellbeing, knowing you had stabbed him to the chest. You continued to make films of Henry suffering, ignoring much of his desperation at having been stabbed. You told him that had not happened, no doubt to convince others who were nearby. Your attitude did not change even though Henry was clearly going downhill very fast. Your brother did much the same, although he may just have been accepting that which you had told him, rather than lying himself. You lied to him that you had been attacked, picking up on his question about whether it had been accompanied by racism by falsely claiming that Henry had called you a “Paki.” I am sure that Henry had said nothing racist. You are the only person to make that claim and it is completely at odds with his previous character.
You joined your brother in relating these lies to the police. By then your mother and father were at the scene. Gurpreet explained that no weapons had been involved or were present. In fact, whilst he was talking to the call operator, you told your mother to take the murder weapon, sheath and belt away which she did. You did not tell your father what had really happened. Much of the time you just stood by as he, at least, tried to do something to help Henry.
You carried on telling these wicked lies when police attended on the scene, hampering them in doing their job and, effectively, obstructing the course of justice. You kept Henry’s phone with the incriminating recording of you on it. You had no intention of handing it over. It was found on you after you had been arrested and taken into police custody.
Thereafter, the time came when the police needed permission from a court to extend the time for you to be questioned in custody and arranged for you and Gurpreet to be taken there for that purpose. They took the opportunity to record secretly any conversation between the two of you on the journey. Speaking in Punjabi, you agreed to pretend you had acted in self-defence even though you confessed to stabbing Henry three times, including once to the chest with the dagger. You knew you were guilty, demonstrated by your saying to Gurpreet that if there were any cameras in that part of Belmont Road, you would be unable to put forward self-defence. You decided, much as you had at the scene, to try to cover it up. In all your police interviews, you decided not to answer questions about the incident. Instead, you made a written statement, on 7/12/2025, which told more lies.
I will not comment on the ‘Britishness’ or tribal behaviour of the murderer and his family. I will merely wonder whether their reaction to the murder makes civil war inevitable.
Here’s how the Guardian supposed ‘newspaper’ reported the alleged attempted beheading in Belfast
Headline: How Belfast knife attack became the latest far-right ‘trigger event
Strapline: The rapid spread of footage shows how social media is pivotal in enabling far-right agitators to mobilise internationally
Main text
Filmed at about 10.30pm on Monday night on a Belfast street, bystanders captured the moment when a man, believed to be a Sudanese asylum seeker, wielded a knife over another man he had pinned to the ground.
By Tuesday, the clip had become the latest transnational “trigger event” – in the mould of the Southport killings and the case of the murdered 18-year-old student Henry Nowak – as far-right activists from Britain and beyond seized on it.
Those playing a pivotal role in the spread of the footage on Elon Musk’s X included the far-right activist known as Tommy Robinson, fresh from a meeting this week at a sumptuous Moscow hotel with the billionaire’s father.
X eventually placed age-related restrictions and a warning on the video shared by Robinson, but by Tuesday afternoon it had more than 52,000 views, while full and uncensored versions were still easy to find across the platform.
Hold on a minute There are more than a few problems with this report from the supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian:
The multi-cultural enricher from Sudan didn’t just “wield a knife over another man he had pinned to the ground”. The Sudanese gentleman was actually (from what I understand) trying to cut the Belfast’s man’s head off. That’s not just “wielding a knife“.
There is no investigation in the supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – of how the alleged beheader came to Britain illegally by using the Southern Irish open-border route nor of how many thousands (or tens of thousands?) have illegally invaded Britain by coming via the utterly corrupt mafia state – the Irish Republic
There is no investigation in the supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – of how the alleged beheader was allowed by our worse than useless Home Office to stay in Britain despite being an illegal migrant
The supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – uses the depressingly predictable Starmer and Establishment tactic of trying to ‘shoot the messenger’ – attack anyone reporting on the alleged beheading. It hardly seems to criticise the alleged beheader
The supposed ‘newspaper’ – the Guardian – rather unsubtly tries to drag Elon Musk, Elon Musk’s father and Tommy Robinson into the story and tries to throw mud at them, especially when the Guardian writes about “a sumptuous Moscow hotel”
I could go on. But I imagine you get the picture by now. I don’t know who, if anyone, actually reads the Guardian apart from BBC lifers and our useless, ‘progressive’, migrant-hugging, UK-hating, climate catastrophist teachers. But clearly they inhabit a woke world far detached from anything resembling reality.
Ir’s so predictable it’s becoming more than insulting. Every time some multi-cultural enricher commits some awful crime against a White British citizen and people get angry at the collapse of our society due to mass-migration, open-borders, Third-world invasion, Starmer and his UK-hating cronies (enthusiastically supported by the BBC and most of the mainstream media) launch their all-out attacks on anyone daring to discuss how and why the latest atrocity happened. Of course, the UK-loathing, UN-adoring, Davos-loving Starmer and his anti-British apparatchiks desperately avoid discussing the reazson for the actual atrocity. Deflection and evasion are the names of the game they play again and again and again and …….
Here’s the excellent New Culture Forum explaining the Starmer ‘shoot the messenger’ deflection tactic:
Here’s a picture of three very famous Welsh people.
They are all particularly known for their distinctive voices and two have definitely sung in Welsh choirs. But can you spot the one most likely to become an Islam-inspired mass murderer? Our politicians and Home Office bureaucrats and police can’t.
Is “Eurabia” more than a conspiracy theory?
The basis for the push to swamp Europe with our friends from our favourite religion is based on the idea that the French, who have always loathed (envied?) the US, were keen to weaken relations with America and instead build closer relations with the Arab countries. This would, of course, elevate France’s position in the world as one of the leaders of the Europe/Arab power block and ensure reliable supplies of oil and gas to Europe.
Wikipedia tells us that those pushing the Eurabia theory claim that Europe: “has surrendered to Islam and is in a state of submission (described as dhimmitude) in which Europe is forced to deny its own culture, stand silently by in the face of Muslim atrocities, accept Muslim immigration, and pay tribute through various types of economic assistance.”
We’re assured that Eurabia is an Islamophobic conspiracy theory and a doomsday scenario in which Europe will be Islamized in the near future. The doomsday scenario involves Muslims forming the majority of Europe’s population by the end of the 21st century, due to immigration and to higher birth-rates. They will then seize control and Islamize the continent.
Of course, the people espousing the Eurabia theory are obviously demented conspiracy theorists. Apart from the beheading of a French teacher, the attempted beheading of Lee Rigby, the recent attempted beheading of a Belfast man, the Southport dance class massacre, the Manchester Arena massacre, the Paris concert massacre, the Charlie Hebdo massacre, the Theo Van Gogh murder, the Pim Fortuyn murder, the London transport bombings, the mass rape of possibly tens of thousands of often underage White British girls, the frequent sexual assaults on British girls and women by our Religion of Peace friends and the fact that White British are now minorities in several of our towns and cities, there is absolutely no evidence that our rulers are imposing their Eurabia fantasies on us.
Am I a “racist” Mr Starmer?
I haven’t been rioting and attacking our useless anti-British police or whatever. But, from the little I understand, just because I’d rather not be stabbed multiple times or be beheaded by a multi-cultural enricher next time I go shopping, according to people like Starmer and the BBC and the UK mainstream media, I must be a racist.
David Craig, on June 26th, 2026
