April 2024

Is the UK government about to hand over control of our lives to the corrupt WHO?

Monday-Tuesday blog

We’ve seen how UK governments have handed over control of our borders to the utterly corrupt United Nations in 2018 by signing the Marrakesh “Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration”. And now it looks like our government is about to do the same for many parts of our lives by handing decision-making to the possibly even more corrupt, ludicrously misnamed  World Health Organisation.

The next pandemic

We now know that there will be another pandemic. Firstly, because governments around the world will have seen how easy it is to create biological weapons by doing gain of function research on existing viruses making them more infectious and more pathogenic. So we can be sure that many governments, some of who will not be our friends, have started their own gain of function research to develop new biological weapons. And we can be sure that some of this work will be carried out in labs that are about as biologically secure as your average Indian take-away. So there will be leaks as happened in Wuhan.

Moreover, hopefully you know about the Project Veritas sting in which a Pfizer researcher seems to be showing off to a female companion about Pfizer also intends to do gain of function research in order to pre-emptively develop new profitable vaccines.

Here’s part of the Pfizer employee’s revelations:

One of the things we’re exploring is like, why don’t we just mutate it ourselves so we could create – preemptively develop new vaccines, right? So, we have to do that. If we’re gonna do that though, there’s a risk of like, as you could imagine – no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses.

Don’t tell anyone. Promise you won’t tell anyone. The way it would work is that we put the virus in monkeys, and we successively cause them to keep infecting each other, and we collect serial samples from them.

You have to be very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate doesn’t create something that just goes everywhere. Which, I suspect, is the way that the virus started in Wuhan, to be honest. It makes no sense that this virus popped out of nowhere. It’s bulls**t.

From what I’ve heard is they are optimising it, but they’re going slow because everyone is very cautious – obviously they don’t want to accelerate it too much. I think they are also just trying to do it as an exploratory thing because you obviously don’t want to advertise that you are figuring out future mutations

So, if the main vaccine producers are also diving into gain of function research creating more infectious and more dangerous viruses, that’s another potential source of lab leaks.

The World Health Organisation’s coming power-grab?

That brings us to the ludicrously misnamed World Health Organisation (WHO).

In order to strengthen global pandemic governance, the WHO is working on a new international legal instrument that specifically governs pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. This is planned to be ready for final approval by member countries in May 2024. Basically, countries will hand over much of the decision-making about how they respond to the next pandemic to the unelected bureaucrats at the WHO.

This could cover things like lockdowns, international travel restrictions, how many (probably fake and dangerous) vaccines you will be forced to take and so on.

How corrupt is the WHO?

As our useless governments are about to abdicate control of our lives to the venal and incompetent WHO elites, let’s just briefly remind ourselves of how corrupt and incompetent our WHO overlords are:

We now know that China locked down all domestic traffic internally by end January 2020 but pushed to open foreign travel till end March. Data from Tom Tom traffic index, a traffic location site that covers 416 cities across 57 countries show that as a result of this strategy, China, was able to lockdown its cities unknown to the world. While this reduced the spread of the Corona virus within China, China’s aggressive foreign travel policy lead to a virus explosion worldwide.

The COVID- 19 virus first surfaced in Wuhan in the last week of December. On 31 December 2019 Chinese health officials first reported to WHO that 41 patients in Wuhan had contracted a mysterious pneumonia that was not responding to conventional treatment. On 20th of January Zong Nanshan the scientist named by China to lead the battle against the virus stated ” Now we can say that it is certain that it is a human to human transmission phenomenon”.

On January 22 at a meeting to decide the measures to be taken, WHO was not able warn the world of the severity of COVID-19 apparently because of resistance from Beijing. (WHO referred to it as “divergent views”). Moreover, the WHO claimed (under pressure from China) that there was no human to human transmission.

On the 31st January Italy fearing a major outbreak of Coronavirus from hundreds of tourists arriving from China closed all flights to and from China. In spite of China closing down its own domestic travel to prevent the virus spreading, China’s vice-minister of foreign affairs Qin Gang met Italy’s ambassador to China Luca Ferrari in Beijing following the flight ban and the Chinese foreign ministry stated: “Italy’s decision to stop flights without contacting China in advance caused great inconvenience to citizens of both countries. Many Chinese are still stranded in Italy.”

The U.S. issued a travel advisory against China travel on the 2nd of February but did not ban all services. While Chinese authorities limited domestic flights from Wuhan to other Chinese cities like Beijing and Shanghai in an effort to contain the outbreak in January, it urged international carriers to maintain their flying schedules.

China’s assertion that all was well for international travel was supported by the WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus at the opening of the agency’s Executive Board meet on the 3rd February. He said ”There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade. We call on all countries to implement decisions that are evidence-based and consistent. WHO stands ready to provide advice to any country that is considering which measures to take”.

With the Chinese domestic travel lockdown, the average traffic density fell to below 10% in Wuhan and Shanghai during February and below 5% in Beijing. Buy while implementing a total domestic lockdown in February, China kept assuring the world that the situation was not serious and fully under control.

On the 11th of March WHO belatedly declared COVID-19 a global pandemic. By that time the number of cases globally had grown thirteen fold. As per WHO website more than 118,000 cases had been reported in 114 countries, and 4,291 people had lost their lives when the global pandemic was declared. That is when the rest of the world started preparing for a suitable response to the pandemic, nearly two months after China.

I rest my case as to why the UK government shouldn’t sign whatever dreadful, power-grabbing treaty the cess-pit of corruption and incompetence that is the WHO comes up with.

The Wuhan song

And here to cheer us all up is a video I made at the start of the Chinese lab-leaked plague:

4 comments to Is the UK government about to hand over control of our lives to the corrupt WHO?

  • A Thorpe

    It’s like science fiction. Big Pharma is effectively carrying out biological warfare as a means to make more profit. Unfortunately, we know how the story evolves. They will not be able to develop an effective vaccine to save us from the virus they will release.

    I’m not even sure that Covid first surfaced in China. I saw an article recently discussing this but there wasn’t much supporting evidence. I have seen the view before that the USA was investigating outbreaks before Wuhan and the article was suggesting that the virus was released by the USA. I think the outbreak in Italy was not due to Chinese tourists but Chinese workers returning after going to China for New Year celebrations.

    The question we need to ask is how people will react to another invented pandemic. I’m reading Erich Fromm’s book “Escape from Freedom”, first published in 1941 and free on the internet. He says that in medieval times we had a very controlled life with no freedom of choice and so less uncertainty. This changed from the industrial revolution onwards with increasing freedom but also less sense of purpose and more uncertainty. All out work was manual with an identifiable purpose and now we work to serve to serve the vague concept of the economy. Our work doesn’t create wealth for us, it creates wealth for the economy, that is the bankers, business and government through higher taxes. He says that people want a return to certainty and are more willing to accept government control with little questioning especially where it claims to be providing safety. That might be an oversimplification but it makes more sense to me than Desmet’s theories. It explains why people fall for the threats of climate change, the invented pandemic and now the utter nonsense of sex change. The majority want to be saved from themselves, so the WHO is onto a winner.

  • Stillreading

    Wherever Covid 19 may have originated – and my money is on the unsanitary Wuhan lab – a virus, once at large in the world, cannot be controlled by any means within human capability, given its size and capability for constant mutation, which is a feature enabling it to thrive. Even those with no medical or scientific knowledge have only to look at the Antipodes, with their draconian measures to keep their entire populations isolated and locked up at home, to realise this. As soon as the citizens were released from imprisonment, the virus spread exponentially. Almost certainly our daffodil-coloured Government, with its reluctance to stand up to any bully threatening to invade our nation in actuality (the small boats invasion) or in principal (rolling over to the WHO) will surrender our citizens’ rights willingly and as rapidly as they can. Nice to be nominally “in power” yet be able to blame international organisations for all inconvenience suffered by those citizens, isn’t it? Another evil just around the corner is of course “digital identity” with all the intrusions and controls on the individual which will come with it. I actually – after some difficulty and effort – found on line the “consultancy document” which those of us who wish to express a view on digital intrusion ito our lives are required to complete by 1st March, the closing date. Who exactly knew about this in the first place? I certainly didn’t and learned of it only at the weekend thanks to GBNews. In fact, it isn’t worth attempting to complete. The “questionbs” to which responses are required are skewed in such a way that expressing a personal opinion is impossible. So have no doubt: before long we shall be unable to access or spend cash, every single transaction we make will be traced and traceable to the recipient, every site we consult will be noted, even every time we decide to read our own emails will be recorded. We saw T Bliar, Knight of the Garter, a few days ago expressing his support for this. Welcome to 21st Century Digital Hell. The power of the WHO to decide at will when to incarcerate us all is just the start !

  • A Thorpe

    Global Research published this article today which also questions the purpose of the economy, which is a speech given by Emanuel Pastreich in 2020.

    The themes are the same as the book I quoted. Pastreich suggests we need to organise a local economy and new banks then new institutions. Who is going to do this? I can’t see local butchers, grocers and green grocers being created everywhere again. How are new banks going to be created when most people seem to be in debt?

    Stillreading talks about digital currency and this is also related to the purpose of the economy. The economy has just become a means for some people to amass capital as Fromm points out. It is no longer a means for us to live a reasonable life based on trade. But I think it has even come to an end for the elites because the debt is no longer manageable. This is what has produced the idea of digital currency. The objective is to get rid of the debt and take away everything we still own to pay for the debt.

  • tomsk

    We dont have a government/parliament , we have a load of frauds conning the British people whilst selling their birthright away and most Brits are to stupid and dumbed down to see their freedoms are being slowly removed and a digital prison awaits them. One must commend satan on how over time he has slowly infiltrated every echelon and put his people in whilst distracting the population with bread and games in order to bring in his mark ( revelation 13 v 16 ) as he builds his NWO. Treacherous snouts in the trough also giving away their own freedoms for once they are no longer of use they will be disposed of.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>