June 2023
« May    

No aspiration to ‘aspirate’?

Wednesday/Thursday blog

(a slightly different subject today, but hopefully one some readers will find mildly interesting and one which none of the mainstream media will dare touch for reasons that I hope will be obvious)

You’re fired!

Something rather odd is happening in New York State. A mandate came into effect that by Monday evening this week, all the state’s hospital and care home workers had to have had at least one dose of a vaccine against the Chinese Wuhan plague. Following this, hospitals have started suspending and firing hundreds of healthcare workers who refuse to get the vaccines. Any employee of a state-run health care facility who does not receive at least one vaccination dose by the end of the day Monday, barring approved exemptions, “will be immediately suspended,” according to the New York State Department of Health.

For example, Northwell Health, a New York hospital system with over 76,000 employees, said in a statement Tuesday that they have begun a “process to exit all unvaccinated team members.”

Probably over 98% of healthcare workers have complied with the mandate. But there are (I think) over 450,000 healthcare workers in the state, so that still leaves possibly up to 9,000 who for whatever reason either have medical exemptions from the vaccination or else who have some reason have concerns about the vaccines.

We don’t accept liability, no way

Here’s part of the contract which Pfizer uses when making agreements to supply its vaccine to governments:

(left-click on image and then left-click again to see more clearly)

As you’ll see,  this includes a clause: “Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known”


Personally I have taken the vaccine and will take any boosters as I believe that for my age group the vaccine will reduce the chance of severe symptoms when I do catch the Chinese Wuhan plague as we will all do at some point thanks to the sterling work of Dr Frankenstein Fauci, Peter Daszak and their Chinese chums in a filthy, unhygienic Wuhan lab. But there are good reasons to ask whether younger age groups should be coerced into getting vaccinated against a disease that many of them will not even notice.

The molecules or the method?

We’ve all seen the stories about a few people in every million vaccinated getting heart inflammation or rare blood clots following vaccination. And it seems that there are some people who do suffer severe and even fatal consequences from vaccination. It is assumed that the products in the vaccines are responsible. But there is another theory which I haven’t seen discussed anywhere in the mainstream media – that it is the method of vaccination which may be responsible for the injuries and deaths.

The big ‘aspirate’ question

From the miniscule amount I understand, there are two main types of injection – intravenous (direct into a vein) and intramuscular (into a muscle). Most, if not all, common vaccines are given intramuscularly.

Prior to Xi Pingpong’s Chinese plague each year around 16 billion injections were given worldwide. A large number of these are given via the intramuscular (IM) route. Many nurses have been taught to aspirate before giving an IM injection to ensure the medication is not inadvertently delivered into a vein. Aspiration consists of drawing back on the plunger once the needle has been inserted to see if any blood returns into the syringe. It has been recommended that this negative pressure be sustained for 5–10 seconds.

Aspiration avoids the danger of an intramuscular injection accidentally going directly into a vein.

Aspirating when giving a vaccine is clearly a slightly more complex, time-consuming and a slightly more painful method than just ramming the needle in and vaccinating. In order to vaccinate hundreds of millions against Fauci’s plague, governments in many countries have had to recruit tens of thousands of vaccinators, many with little to no medical experience, and have had to convince hundreds of millions of us to overcome our visceral fear of having painful needles jammed into us. For example, the ludicrously-misnamed World Health Organisation, which allowed the Chinese plague to spread worldwide on the instructions of its Chinese controllers, advises against aspiration “in order to minimise pain”.

This is possibly why most countries have instructed their vaccinators to not bother with the safety precaution of aspirating when vaccinating us.

So, it is possible that the rare severe effects and occasional deaths from the vaccines are being caused by the vaccine accidentally being injected directly into a vein rather than a muscle and not by the actual contents of the vaccines themselves. It may be the shortcuts being taken with vaccinations and not the actual vaccinations which are causing the problems.

Here’s Dr John Campbell explaining this possible conundrum:

(you only need to watch the first few minutes of the video to see where he’s coming from)


8 comments to No aspiration to ‘aspirate’?

  • A Thorpe

    I like to know the source of documents and data because I trust nobody these days. I tried to find the contract but no sign of it. However, for me it confirms what I believe to be the case. I’m surprised that Pfizer admit to it in the contract. The government have prevented any legal action against them since it is emergency use.

    The trials were very short and the long term consequences could not be established and now it is not possible because a control group is needed and it has been lost as more people have been vaccinated. It is probably not possible to set up new trials because of this. People who have refused the vaccine are not going to volunteer to have it for a new trial. There are many reported problems but this not not the way to establish problems with vaccines, it should be done before they are authorised. The reported problems can only really be judged against similar problems which unvaccinated people can also suffer from.

    The claimed efficacy is also questionable. Pfizer based it on a relative risk reduction which only considers the people on the trial who were infected and in the case of Pfizer it was based on only 170 people which is not a sufficient sample size, giving an efficacy of about 95%. The absolute efficacy which tells us how we would benefit from it is about 1% when other people on the trial are taken into account. The trial ended very quickly and it is a method the drug manufacturers use to show better results. When they get a good result they stop the trial. This is why it is essential for the trial protocol to be set out and followed. Pfizer reported different results to the FDA with a higher number of infections and it showed very little difference between the two groups, but this was ignored. It confirms what I believe is happening and that is the vaccines are having very little effect on infections.

    The trial also only considered infections and there was no consideration of preventing death or hospitalisation or the severity of the infection. Claims are now being made with no supporting evidence, because it can only come from trials. People now believe if they are vaccinated the infection will not be as severe, but for most people it wasn’t severe anyway. It is just propaganda. I also suspect that anybody getting Covid will exaggerate the symptoms. When I was working and listening to excuses for absence, it was never a cold, always flu, which lasted three days.

    I don’t understand the aspiration issue but it is the reason for all the claims of risks associated with the vaccine. If it gets into the blood stream the spike protein which seems to be the concern gets everywhere. Basically, what I don’t understand is how the vaccine works if it stays in the muscle. Can anybody help? Also interesting that this applies to most vaccines,I assume including flu, but I haven’t heard any claims that this makes the flu vaccine more dangerous.

  • A Thorpe

    I did find the full document by looking up the reference. It is an undated, draft agreement with Albania. I found one reference with a screen shot of Fox News and Tucker Carlson discussing this with the quote about efficacy on the screen, but no date. I can’t find a video of it, which would be interesting. Let’s hope other news channels pick up on this.

  • David Craig

    Yes, this contract is between Pfizer and the Albanian government. But I think you’ll find that the vaccine suppliers all demand clauses protecting them from any legal action before they agree to supply their vaccines to any country

  • A Thorpe

    David, isn’t there a difference between protecting themselves from legal action and effectively saying they don’t know how safe or effective the drug is. Why would any government buy it with this statement included? It would be interesting to find out what is in the UK agreement and what the agreements with other suppliers say.

    There have been some comments saying that we should be given the risks and benefits of any health treatment and agree to them before the treatment takes place. This never happens in the UK for vaccinations. I suspect that if we asked for this with any vaccine we would not be given the information. It would be a case of have the vaccine or don’t.

    I believe the USA and UK government have passed laws saying that we cannot prosecute the suppliers of the vaccines if there are any side effects. I don’t know about other countries.

  • Hardcastle

    I am 75 without any underlying health conditions.However I have had my three score years and ten and realise that sooner or later something will go wrong and I will die.I calculate that I am more likely to die on the road or from one of the reliable killers of the aged than from Covid.The so called anti covid vaccinations are not vaccines in the true sense of the word,they are experimental gene therapies.I certainly do not trust politicians , companies,and those with a pecuniary interest in pharmaceutical products.Futhermore I will not allow coercion to change what should be freedom of choice.What happened to my body,my choice? Fascism and authoritarianism is always just below the surface,it is now very much out in the open and confident.I have never been so disappointed in so many of the population in their craven acceptance of the narrative.

  • Bad Brian

    i got a letter in the post from the NHS today informing me that an appointment has been made for my THIRD dose of Covid-19 vaccine to help increase my immunity levels.

    My mother who is 97, also got an exact same letter.

    The pop up immunisation centre we are to attend is about 10 miles outside town so how my mum is supposed to get there I don’t know and I am certainly not going to give her a lift in my six litre gas guzzler, what with fuel being so precious at this time. She can use the cycle path to the airport the Council took two years to build for people who want to cycle to the airport and then fly away on holiday. Besides, ” The Beast” is where I store my stash of stockpiled toilet rolls and there is simply no room for her.

    That aside, all around Edinburgh, there are car parks, all cordened off, with tents set up as Vaccination Centres ( No appointment required ). At each one there are about five people wearing high viz vests sitting about outside smoking, all at risk of dying of boredowm as NOBODY is going there. No wonder, they look like they should be emptying wheelie bins.

    Anyhow, I am at a loss as to what to do as the more I read about this vaccine, the more puzzled I am at what it is I would be putting into my system. I have read so much stuff about this Woo-Hoo Floo, that I am unable to make any kind of logical decision at any level. One thing for sure, if Dr Fuchi has anytjing to do with it then count me out as he is a twisted,lying, chancer who has been well exposed as the prime lunatic behind this virus along with his inscrutable Chinese friends.

    If only there was some way we could test these vaccine’s first on helpless dumb animals such as bats and pangolins. We might even be able to “enhance” the functions of this virus which as any foel nose, kood only be a good thing for humanity.

    The other strange thing about this letter is that it asks for my bank account number, sort code and pin number to help raise money for the NHS. when I provided there details, I got an acknoledgment email from the Labour Party which addresed me as Dear Tory Scum !

  • Brenda Blessed

    Very well put, Hardcastle.

    Only around 0.04% of the ageing population of a first-world country have a problem with the virus and even then usually only if they test positive for it with one of the discredited PCR and lateral-flow tests 28 days before being hospitalised or dying.

    The US CDC is replacing the PCR test in January 2022 and it has advised that the lateral flow test is so inaccurate that it should be binned.

    Of course, Dr Kary Mullis, who received the 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for the PCR test, is on record saying several times that it is a biochemical test that can be set to find anything in anything, even if it is only a single molecule if its amplification is set high enough. He objected to the test being used as a test for HIV (he died in August, 2019), saying that it cannot be used as a test for a viral infection or to determine if anyone is ill.

    The average age of the populations of most African countries is in the teens. Therefore, Covid is not going to be a problem to life-expectancy there for at least 50 years. And even then, its effects will hardly be noticeable. Yet the West is set on getting every African vaccinated.

    The media is doing nothing to report the adverse reactions and deaths attributed to the vaccinations.

    There are several governmental and other organisations that are collecting information about the adverse reactions and deaths attributed to the vaccinations. As might have been expected, the figures they collect are very difficult to tally, obviously in order to make them as difficult as possible to reveal.

    One of them in the US is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VAERS). You have to use a site such as the “National Vaccine Information Center”, to obtain the figures. And even on it, you have to find and go to the following very long link to find the following result.

    “From the 9/17/2021 release of VAERS data:
    Found 15,386 cases where Vaccine targets COVID-19 (COVID19) and Patient Died”

    Here is the long link. That result dos not appear on the home page of that website.

    It is a similar state of affairs with our government’s Yellow Card reporting scheme.

    MHRA – Medicines & Healthcare products
    Regulatory Agency – Yellow Card scheme –

    As of the 1st September the MHRA Yellow Card scheme had received 314,700 reports of adverse reactions to the Pfizer jab and 820,923 reports of adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca jab. They also received 47,977 reports of adverse reactions to the Moderna jab and 3,244 reports where the brand of vaccine was not specified. The MHRA states that only 1% to 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the Yellow Card scheme.

    Note that the AstraZeneca shots are not available in the USA. Only the Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson are used.

    Another US reporting system is “The CMS Medicare Tracking System”. Here is a link to a video about its reports:

    50,000 Medicare Patients Died After Getting COVID Vaccine –

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>