Archives

May 2020
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

More proof that the Covid-19 Coronavirus leaked from a Chinese lab?

(weekend blog)

Since the start of the Chinese Coronavirus Covid-19 plague, this website has been trying to deal with a subject that no major media outlet will cover – whether the Covid-19 Coronavirus didn’t come from the Wuhan ‘wet market’ as the mainstream media claim but was accidentally leaked from the biosafety Level-4 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In particular, I’ve highlighted the work being done by Dr Peng Zhou who has been experimenting with various versions of Ebola, SARS and Coronavirus to understand how bats can carry these diseases without becoming infected themselves.

Here yet again is Dr Peng Zhou’s description of his project taken directly from the Wuhan Institute of Virology website:

“Taking bats as the research object, I will answer the molecular mechanism that can coexist with Ebola and SARS- associated coronavirus for a long time without causing disease, and its relationship with flight and longevity.”

By the way, a biosafety Level-4 lab is the highest security classification by the World Health Organisation and are used for diagnostic work and research on easily transmitted pathogens which can cause fatal disease. These include a number of viruses known to cause viral hemorrhagic fever such as Marburg virus, Ebola virus, Lassa virus, and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever. Porton Down in the UK is a Level-4 lab.

However, the situation may be worse than I have previously described. Here’s an article from the Washington News suggesting that our lying, corrupt, disease-ridden Chinese friends may have been experimenting on bats and the Covid-19 Coronavirus at another research facility in Wuhan – the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control –  which is only a biosafety Level-2 institution. (A biosafety Level-2 lab is only slightly more hygienic than your local Chinese takeaway). The Wuhan Institute of Virology is about 3 miles from the Wuhan ‘wet market’, the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control is about 280 metres from the Wuhan ‘wet’market’.

(I should say that the Washington News is a mainly conservative newspaper with a small daily circulation of around 52,000 copies. The main Washington newspaper is the Washington Post with a daily circulation of over 350,000.)

Here in the UK, I have been feeding evidence to several journalists and publications that the Covid-19 Coronavirus was accidentally leaked from a Chinese government research lab. But for some reason, no journalist nor any mainstream media want to carry the story. Instead they’re all sticking with the official version that the virus came from the Wuhan ‘wet market’.

Anyway, here’s the link to the article. Judge for yourselves where the Covid-19 Coronavirus really originated:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/30/china-researchers-isolated-bat-coronaviruses-near-/

I have a feeling that if you watch from about 16.40 minutes to 26.00 minutes of the video below, this may be the Chinese documentary about collection of over 2,000 bat viruses by the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control that the Washington News article refers to.

This documentary was, of course, made before the dirty, corrupt, disease-ridden Chinese accidentally released the Covid-19 plague on the world:

6 comments to More proof that the Covid-19 Coronavirus leaked from a Chinese lab?

  • A Thorpe

    It would be interesting to know, but it isn’t going to change anything. I’m really more concerned about what is going on in the UK. The Telegraph has published an article about the different views of Oxford and Imperial College academics. When academics cannot agree and our government decides which one is right on a whim, it is a recipe for disaster. That is what we have with the lockdown policy. There is now talk of relaxing it, a sure sign that they realise has been a failure. Sweden is the only country with a sensible policy. This video https://youtu.be/NPtwcbWUg2I is by an medical expert who also addresses policy at the end.

    I’d like to hear somebody explain why human lives matter. We are not a species at risk of extinction. What is really being said is my life matters and because of this we put other lives at risk in the future because of selfish and badly thought out decisions today. Then we have the nonsense of clapping and rainbows in windows. Professor Pavlov would have enjoyed observing these experiments on people.

  • chris

    Am I missing something ? Why did this Wuhan lab develop a fairly harmless virus which causes flu like symptoms but is very rarely lethal for normal healthy people. Could such a virus be just a ‘stepping stone’ to something more deadly?

  • david brown

    this was a few days ago however one of the very few articles in uk press even questioning the China official coronavirus death toll. http://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11299461/china-britain-spreading-lies-coronavirus-response/

    I suspect the main stream media has probably been requested to go along with the official Chinese figure which shows far less deaths than Italy. Which has over 500,000 Chinese residents. Only one out its first 79 virus deaths was Italian.
    Planes have continued to arrive from China at Heathrow with no checks on passengers. London is a major global financial centre and after the USA , China has the second largest GDP. We are beholden to them.

  • david brown

    Chris – A plague weapon to depopulate the Western World when the time comes?

  • twi5ted

    The ONS figures published Tue are the only way to understand context. Pity national figures for total deaths are not being published daily the same way NHS can publish the covid19 figures at 2pm daily.

    China lied about the numbers and that is not news to people that follow their economic numbers. China lies and needs to always save face. They are relatively inexperienced at handling this sort of thing and their response is naturally authoritarian no doubt guided by the WHO / UN.

    The question so far remains is it worth destroying the western economies to prolong the life of mostly terminally ill elderly citizens. Toby Young wrote a controversial article in telegraph saying that putting a price on life or death happens every day.

    “In fact, NHS doctors place a monetary value on patients’ lives and use it to make clinical decisions every day. As a general rule, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence values one quality-adjusted life year (Qaly) at between £15,000 and £30,000, depending on health. Even if we assume that each of those 250,000 people will enjoy another eight years of perfect health, we’re still valuing their lives twice as highly as we would in normal times”.

    250,000 is now 20,000 so the real cost is a lot higher but the long term damage and potential loss of liberty is not worth any price. We must have enough capacity in place and high risk / vulnerable continue to isolate but the country needs to then reopen asap.

    Less than 10% of deaths are below 60 only 1% below 40.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>