Archives

September 2026
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  

Time to throw political correctness in the garbage where it belongs

For those readers who haven’t heard of her, I’d like to introduce you to Brigitte Gabriel. She is a Maronite Christian who was born and spent part of her childhood in Lebanon. There she experienced first-hand some of the joys of the Religion of Peace. She has written several books and regularly speaks about her experiences in order to warn people of the dangers facing the developed world.

Here’s a short (4 minute) YouTube video where Ms Gabriel trashes our rulers’ constant claims that we have nothing to worry about as the majority of adherents of the Religion of Peace are ‘moderate’ (click on the arrow in the centre to view)

(Some readers will have noticed that I’ve put a “donate” button on the website. I felt embarrassed doing this, so I want to be totally transparent about money. It costs me about £250 a year to run this website including hosting and making occasional changes. I’ve run it for about 5 years so have spent about £2,000 of my money on it – including the original site creation costs. So far, I have received about £100 in donations. This is not a complaint. I just want readers to be clear that this is not a great money-making venture and unlike most other people I’m not trying to fleece you)

 

Would you support a charity like The Angelus Foundation?

For legal reasons, I have to be quite careful about what I write today. But I’d like to introduce you to charity No 1139830 – The Angelus Foundation

The Angelus Foundation was founded in 2009 by Maryon Stewart, a health practitioner, author and broadcaster. Her 21 year-old daughter Hester, a medical student and athlete, passed away after consuming a legal high (GBL) in April 2009. The Foundation has since attracted a group of experts, which make up the Angelus Advisory Board. They bring together expertise from chemical, medical and behavioural sciences, as well as having considerable knowledge and experience in the areas of enforcement and misuse of substances.

Our Mission Statement – To help society understand the dangers of ‘legal highs’ (new psychoactive substances), to reduce the harm they cause to young people and their families, and to save lives.

Our Aims and Objectives – We aim to become the acknowledged expert and knowledge centre on the subject of the dangers of legal highs and to maximise public understanding of the risks.

So far, so good.

After seeing Maryon Stewart being interviewed on the TV, I had a quick look at the financial accounts of this charity. I’m not a beancounter, so I may well have completely misunderstood what the accounts were showing. But here’s what I understood:

The Angelus Foundation spent only £137,673 of the £235,609 raised in 2012 on what the accounts classed as ‘charitable activities’. That’s just 58 per cent of its income. A year later in 2013 it used £140,974 on ‘charitable activities’ out of £296,975 raised – only 47 per cent of its income.

However, within ‘charitable activities’ were things like ‘admin support’ – £23,182 in 2012 and £25,155 in 2013 and ‘fundraising expenses’ – £9,163 in 2012 and £8,906 in 2013. The administrative assistant is an employee of the founder’s company and the ‘fundraising expenses’ included under ‘charitable activities’ were in addition to the £85,000 paid in 2012 and £155,020 used in 2013 as ‘costs of generating funds’. The ‘charitable activities’ also included ‘travel’ £9,737 in 2012 and £7,172 in 2013 and ‘rent’ paid to the founder – £6,000 in each year

Many other charities class items such as admin support, rent and fundraising expenses as running costs rather than, as in this case, ‘charitable activities’. Moreover, in 2012, the charity’s founder was paid £47,186 in ‘consultancy fees’ and another £49,800 ‘consultancy fees’ in 2013. The charity classed these ‘consultancy fees’ as ‘charitable activities’ and they accounted for 34 per cent of charitable spending in 2012 and 35 per cent of charitable spending in 2013 (click on chart to see more clearly)

angelus

Now, some people will feel it is absolutely right that someone putting the effort into setting up a charity should be rewarded for their time and contribution. Moreover, there may even be people who believe these ‘consultancy fees’ should be permitted to be classed as ‘charitable activities’ by both the auditors and the Charity Commission. However, there may be others who would feel a sense of unease if they knew just how much of the donated money was paid out to this charity’s founder each year in consultancy fees under the heading ‘charitable activities’.

My brief look at the accounts of this charity suggests that only about £1.69 of every £10 raised was really being used for what I would consider genuine charitable activities. But I’m not an accountant and so could be wrong.

I wonder how many of Britain’s 190,000+ charities are using their money in a similar way to the Angelus Foundation?

Islamo-Dave just loves the Religion of Peace

Our spineless PM may u-turn and change direction depending on which way the wind blows or rather, depending on whatever UKIP does. But there is one area where he has been totally consistent – his adoration of the Religion of Peace:

Here are just a few of Islamo-Dave’s pronouncements:

“There is nothing in *sl*m that justifies acts of terror” PM David Cameron reacting to the beheading of British soldier Lee Rigby by two *sl*mists who shouted “Allahu Akbar” and quoted 22 verses from the Koran.

“They don’t represent *sl*m or M*sl*ms in Britain or anywhere else in the world” PM David Cameron’s reaction to the massacre by *sl*mists in Nairobi’s Westgate shopping centre of anyone who failed to name the mother of the founder of *sl*m or recite verses from the Koran.

“*sl*mic State has nothing to do with the great religion of *sl*m, a religion of peace” David Cameron, denying any connection between the creation of an *sl*mic caliphate and *sl*m.

“[The massacre in Pakistan] is nothing to do with one of the world’s great religions – *sl*m, which is a religion of peace” PM David Cameron speaking after a group of Taliban gunmen murdered 141, including 132 children at a school in northern Pakistan.

As for one of the greatest threats to the British way of life (or what’s left of it) – the possible admission of Turkey’s 80 million M*sl*ms into the EU – Cameron has said he “strongly supports” this and has hit out at those who ‘wilfully misunderstand *sl*m’ in order to oppose Turkey’s membership. He said: “They see no difference between real *sl*m and the distorted version of the extremists. They think the values of *sl*m can never be compatible with the values of other religions, societies or cultures. All these arguments are just plain wrong. I want us to be at the forefront of an international effort to defeat them”

islamification

And, of course, Dave has said that he would like the UK to have a M*sl*m prime minister at some point in the future.

At the next election, the Tories will try to claim that ‘a vote for UKIP is a vote for Miliband’. But one thing we can be sure of is that a vote for Dodgy Dave is a vote for the *sl*mification of Britain.

(By the way, several readers have suggested that I set up a facility whereby people can donate money to pay for the costs of keeping this blog going. So, I’ve done this. There’s a donate button in the top right and if anybody did want to make a small contribution they can pay by either PayPal or any debit or credit card)

Why do they call them “care homes”? “You dirtee laydee!” Slap!

Around 800,000 elderly people in Britain have some form of dementia and severe memory problems. As medical care and general health improve, this number will increase.

About 322,000 elderly are looked after in “care homes” and of these at least 80% (257,600) have memory difficulties.

There was the usual hand-wringing from the BBC today over the fact that 4 out of every 5 nurses hired by the NHS this year were foreign. One would hope that these nurses are actually qualified and haven’t just bought their qualifications as many doctors and nurses do in some countries. Also one would assume they have to speak reasonable English to get a job with the NHS.

However, such demands are not required for foreigners working in British care homes. Someone I know worked for a couple of years for a care agency looking after elderly people both in their own homes and in care homes. This person spoke rather limited English and her ‘training’ consisted of shadowing a more experienced care assistant for just 2 days. After that, she was on her own, sometimes dealing with very vulnerable older patients.

Many elderly people are probably getting good care in Britain’s care homes. But others will end up in a care home with some lazy ‘carer’ shouting at them in pidgin English:

“You a dirtee laydee” (slap)

“I no get monee nuff” (punch)

“Ha, ha see I do what want” (slap) “What you do ’bout it, laydee? No-one listen you, dirtee laydee” (punch)

“You smell bad, dirty laydee. Why you do poo-poo in bed?” (push) “I no clean you, you own fault, dirtee laydee” (walks out slamming door leaving someone’s mother lying in her own excrement)

care

Still, at least running a care home is a very lucrative business with charges of £30,000 a year not uncommon. Britain’s care homes have made an awful lot of enterprising businesspeople very rich indeed and able to afford things like hiring private jets, expensive sado-masochistic sex sessions with male prostitutes and £200,000 wedding ceremonies.

“It had nothing to do with *sl*m”

As the Sydney siege ends in bloodshed, our rulers and the politically-correct elites in the mainstream media are quick to assure us that what took place “had nothing to so with *sl*m”

So, I thought the only responsible thing I could do on my blog today would be to remind readers of many other episodes that also “had nothing to do with *sl*m”

These demonstrations, for example, clearly “had nothing to do with *sl*m”

islam progress 1

Nor these ones:

refugees 2

Nor this lot:

islam progress 4

Nor the London bombings:

islam progress 2

I could go on, but by now hopefully readers will be clear that nothing ever has anything to do with *sl*m:

IS and Nazis

Readers may be aware of a shocking attack in Pakistan today by the Taliban killing over 100 children. This attack, of course, had nothing to do with *sl*m!!!!!

Why would we want to leave the EU?

At this time of year, the media are forever giving us “Top Ten” lists – the top ten films, the top ten records, the top ten children’s presents etc etc.

So I tried to draw up the Top Ten Reasons for leaving the corrupt, wasteful, undemocratic, economically-crippled EU. But there were so many excellent reasons to escape from the EU catastrophe, that I found it difficult to pick the ten best. So, I’ll leave it up to you to choose your own personal Top Ten:

– The loss of control of our borders and the immigration tsunami of 46,000 people a month ever since 1997

– The constraints and burdens on us by a diarrhoea of intrusive and usually unnecessary directives

– The fact that it is a protectionist customs union which works to reduce free trade thus hugely increasing costs of food and other products for EU citizens

– The other countries in it are economically very illiberal and weigh us down

– The British have always fought for freedom and don’t want to be ruled by a corrupt, rotten, undemocratic superstate

– The economic decline of Europe – who wants to be tied to a drowning man?

– The loss of our independent representation at the World Trade Organisation

– The loss of our voice at the International Monetary Fund in favour of France who seem to run it, and hate us

– The possible loss of our seat on the UN Security Council in favour of the EU

– The absurd taxes for lunatic, eco-fascist policies which have no basis in science

– The rules on using biofuels which have led to massive deforestation and switching land from food to fuel production. The rules have pushed up food prices, were called ‘a crime against humanity’ by the UN and have caused starvation in many Third World countries

– The fraud of the CAP and its transfer of our money to rich landowners while pushing up our food bills

– The self-evident failure of the Eurozone’s economic policies which have led to half of all young people in some Club Med countries being unemployed and without any chance of ever getting a proper job

– Being governed by political pygmies like Barroso, Juncker, Van Rompuy, Martin Schultz and their ilk

– The fact there are 7 billion other people in the world to do trade with, beyond the EU’s increasingly impoverished and bankrupt 500 million

– The loss of our Anglosphere ties with Australia, New Zealand, Canada, the rest of the Commonwealth and the USA

– The enforced Islamisation of much of Western Europe

– The gradual loss of our English common law system and increasing impotence of our own courts

–  The European Arrest Warrant used by corrupt police in Club Med and East European mafia countries to prosecute innocent British citizens

– The fact that some states – Bulgaria, Romania and several others – are just mafia rackets, not real countries

– The way the EU has deposed EU-sceptic leaders in Italy and Greece and installed its own bureaucrats to take control

– The history of EU corruption and waste, and the lack of accountability from Brussels

– The ludicrous waste of the EU circus travelling to Strasbourg for a few days every month to satisfy French vanity and the restauranteurs, hoteliers and prostitutes of Strasbourg

– The history of its anti-democratic behaviour, repeating referendums, secret committees, etc that are driven by self-confessed liars like Juncker

– The absurdity of governing 28 economies with one currency, as one economy

– The barmy idea of governing 250+ ethnicities, dialects, faiths, cultures as USA mk2

– The reality of our rivalry with F, G, S, I, in dealings and trade around the world

– The EU is a pig circus, a casino, a brothel of competing chicaneries

– It’s becoming a German Fourth Reich where other countries supinely do whatever the Germans command

– We don’t need it as much as it needs us. Germany in particular needs us as we buy so much from them that we are their biggest customer

Of course, there will be many more excellent reasons for getting out of the cesspit that is the EU. But I’d be rather hard-pressed thinking up so many reasons for staying in it.

Is it any wonder we have such worthless politicians?

Here’s what I worry about:

worry 1

Here’s what the vast majority of British voters worry about:

worry 2

Is it any wonder that we have such worthless, greedy, self-serving thieving, incompetent politicians?

greedyMPs

Is it any wonder that our once great country is being destroyed?

Maybe I was wrong yesterday?

Following a number of readers’ comments yesterday, I felt I should reproduce what one reader wrote as it gives a different side to the ‘poverty in Britain’ story. The poverty charities always hugely exaggerate the numbers of people in poverty and over the years have been forced to retract their figures several times. So, probably the truth is somewhere between what I wrote and what this reader writes?

Shock figures show 11 million British including 2.6 million children are living in poverty
Child poverty is rising under David Cameron’s government as a total of 10.6 million were in absolute poverty

Almost 11 million British citizens are still living in poverty. Shocking official figure includes 2.6 million children growing up below the breadline. Despite a Government pledge to end the scandal, the number of children in absolute poverty has shot up by 200,000 once housing costs are taken into account.

Charities and campaigners said the aim to end child poverty by 2020 is in tatters. Alison Garnham, of the Child Poverty Action Group, warned the situation now is even worse because the figures are from 2012, the last year benefits increased in line with inflation.

The Department for Work and Pensions statistics revealed 23% of British are struggling on low incomes, the highest number since 2002. The number of people in relative poverty, 60% of average income or less, did drop by 100,000 to 9.7 million in 2012. Children in relative poverty remained stuck at 2.3 million. A total of 10.6million were in absolute poverty with housing costs factored in. But Complacent Tory Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith claimed the figures were a triumph, boasting: “We have protected the most vulnerable families from falling behind with 300,000 fewer children in poverty since 2010.”

Ms Garnham pointed out: “There are half a million more in absolute poverty in households where someone has a disability than last year.” And she warned low wages meant having a job was often not enough to ward off hardship.

Charity Gingerbread said the number of working, single parent families in poverty has soared from 17% to 22%. Chief executive Fiona Weir said: “It is deeply concerning that while the economy is on the up, hundreds of thousands remain trapped into poverty. For far too many single parent families, work offers no real promise of escape from hardship, as today’s figures show a rise in working poverty where a single mum or dad is working full-time.”

The shocking figures exposed the truth about the Tory-led coalition’s brutal policies, TUC general secretary Frances O’Grady said: “Without a major affordable home building programme and action to secure fair wages, this type of poverty will continue to grow.”

Shadow Work Secretary Rachel Reeves added: “The last Labour Government lifted over one million children out of poverty, helped thousands of families into work, built children’s centres and introduced child and working tax credit to make work pay. But under David Cameron child poverty is forecast to rise, not fall.”

November 03, 2014
90,000 children in Britain to face Christmas homeless

90,000 children in Britain – the equivalent of three in every school – will spend this Christmas homeless, government figures show. With their helpline already stretched to breaking point, Shelter are launching an emergency appeal in response.

The figures also show that the number of homeless families living in B&Bs has almost doubled in three years. This is particularly alarming following the shocking results of a Shelter investigation into living conditions in B&Bs. The in-depth investigation into 20 families found that well over half felt unsafe in their temporary accommodation, with parents reporting exposure to drug and alcohol abuse, fighting, swearing and racist language. The investigation also showed the emotional impact on the children living this way. Over half of the families said their children’s mental or emotional health had been affected, including reports of depression and panic attacks. With the number of homeless families on the rise, Shelter is bracing itself for a surge in calls to its helpline, and has launched an emergency appeal to help its services cope with the strain this Christmas.

Felicia, a mother of two, was evicted along with her children after her marriage broke down. With nowhere to go, they became homeless and had to live in a B&B for two months: ‘My children had already been through hell before we got to the B&B, but once we moved in their mental health declined with every passing day. My son became depressed for the first time in his life and wouldn’t get out of bed, and my daughter even started self-harming. As a mother it was heart-breaking to see, but I felt so helpless because living in the B&B was our only option. If I hadn’t found Shelter I don’t know what we would have done, but thankfully they were able to help find us a more stable place to live.’

Campbell Robb, Shelter’s chief executive, called on the public to donate what they can to the emergency appeal:
‘In the 21st century it cannot be right that homeless children are experiencing severe emotional distress, facing three hour round trips to school and having to eat their dinner on the floor. Our advisers will be working tirelessly to support people who find themselves homeless this Christmas, but it’s getting harder and harder for us to be there for every family that needs us. We urgently need more support from the public to help us make sure no-one has to fight homelessness on their own this Christmas.’

November 22, 2014

300,000+ workers paid less than minimum wage. Yet in the past year, no companies were prosecuted

The Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings for the Office for National Statistics recently found that about 287,000 workers were paid at less than the minimum wage in 2012, although the TUC puts the figure closer to 350,000. This, despite ministers’ claims that the government is “getting tough” on under-payers, the last successful criminal prosecution was in February 2013. That was one of only two prosecutions during the government’s entire term of office to date, according to figures given to parliament. The cases involved the imposition of fines to the value of £3,696 on an opticians in Manchester and £1,000 on a security company in London.

Failing to pay the minimum wage was made a criminal offence in 2007. Under Labour, seven organizations were prosecuted, including Torbay council.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) said that only the most serious breaches of the national minimum wage are prosecuted. But because the average cost of a successful prosecution was around £50,000 HMRC believed it was preferable to focus on recouping wages for workers through civil penalty powers.

November 29, 2014

13,000 slaves in UK

Government’s strategy to end slavery as number of victims found to be up to four times higher than thought

Britain has a system to subsidise a series of sectors of its economy by people who have no power and can be exploited at will. This was the slavery system in the old days.

The figure for 2013 marks the first time the government has made an official estimate of the scale of modern slavery in the UK, and includes women forced into prostitution, domestic staff, and workers in fields, factories and fishing. The National Crime Agency (NCA)’s human trafficking centre had previously put the number at 2,744.

The data was collated from sources including the police, the UK Border Force, charities and the Gangmasters Licensing Authority. The Home Office described the estimate as a figure that may not have come to the NCA’s attention. Professor Bernard Silverman, the chief scientific adviser to the Home Office, said the new statistical analysis aimed to calculate the number of hidden victims who are not reported to the authorities.

Aidan McQuade, the director of the Anti-Slavery International charity, questioned whether the government’s strategy went far enough. He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If you leave an employment relationship, even if you’re suffering from any sort of exploitation up to and including forced labour, even if you’re suffering from all sorts of physical and sexual violence, you’ll be deported. So that puts enormous power in the hands of unscrupulous employers. And frankly, the protections which the government has put in place are not worth the paper they’re written on in order to prevent this sort of exploitation once they’ve given employers that sort of power.”

Many victims are foreign nationals from countries such as Romania, Poland, Albania and Nigeria, but vulnerable British adults and children are also systematically preyed upon by traffickers and slave drivers. The NCA estimates that the UK was the third most common country of origin for slavery victims.

In November 2013 three highly traumatised women were rescued from a house in south London where they appear to have been held captive for 30 years, Scotland Yard said. One of the women contacted Aneeta Prem, the founder of the Freedom Charity, after seeing her on TV.

November 12, 2014

Soaring fuel bills will kill a pensioner every 7 minutes this winter

A pensioner will die from cold every seven minutes in Britain this winter, a damning report from Age UK warns. Soaring fuel bills and poorly insulated homes are blamed by Age UK for the thousands of older people who die due to cold weather each winter. A new survey for the charity reveals one in three pensioners now fear they cannot afford to heat their homes. More than five million people aged over 65 say the soaring cost of fuel is one of their biggest worries over the winter months.

Fuel poverty is a national scandal which has claimed the lives of too many people – both old and young – for far too long and left many more suffering from preventable illness.

****

Benefit Sanctions That Killed An Ex-Soldier

David Clapson, died in July, aged 59.

Clapson’s £71.70 weekly allowance (now a magnificent £72.40pw) was stopped for a month in July because he missed an appointment for the government’s Work Programme in May. He was found dead in his flat on 20 July. He’d died from from diabetic ketoacidosis (caused by an acute lack of insulin). [The Work Programme having an amazing 4.6% success rate.]

The Guardian reported: “When Gill Thompson, his younger sister, discovered his body, she found his electricity had been cut off (meaning that the fridge where he kept his insulin was no longer working). There was very little left to eat in the flat – six teabags, an out-of-date tin of sardines and a can of tomato soup. His pay-as-you-go mobile phone had just 5p credit left on it and he had only £3.44 in his bank account. The autopsy notes reveal that his stomach was empty.”

The BBC reported: “She added his electricity card had no credit, meaning the fridge where his insulin was kept chilled, was not working.” His sister writes: ‘David wasn’t a “scrounger.” He had worked for 29 years; 5 years in the Army – including two years in Northern Ireland in the 1970s, during the height of the troubles – 16 years with British Telecom, eight years with various other companies, and in recent years was a carer for our sick mother. When mum went into a home, David turned to the state for help, receiving benefits while he looked for work and taking unpaid work placements.’

Clapson had been searching for work, and a pile of CVs were found by his body. The last time he spoke to his sister, a few days before he died, he told her he was waiting to hear back about an application he had made to the supermarket chain Lidl. On the petition, she writes: “He had been on work placements, passed his fork lift truck certificate and had been on a computer training course. Questions need to be asked of how Iain Duncan Smith is justifying benefit sanctions. What is the full impact of these sanctions? Are they working or simply putting the vulnerable further at risk? I don’t want anybody else to die like this.”

Clapson was sent a letter explaining how to request hardship funds but his sister found it unopened in his flat. “He was very bad at opening letters,” she told the Guardian. “People in his situation are frightened of these letters. They are never good news.”

The DWP (the stinking hypocrites) has sent BuzzFeed a statement: “Our sympathies are with the family of Mr Clapson. Decisions on sanctions aren’t taken lightly – there is a chain of processes we follow before a sanction comes into effect, including taking every opportunity to contact the claimant several times. People can also appeal if they disagree. Even when someone is sanctioned they can still get financial support through the hardship fund and we continue to spend around £94bn a year on working age benefits to ensure a safety net is in place. Mr Clapson did not appeal or ask for a reconsideration of the sanction or apply for a hardship payment. We were aware of Mr Clapson’s diabetes but at no time did he tell us he was having problems with his condition or medication.” (So it was really all his own fault and he really (sort-of) committed suicide).

****

Note: A hardship payment is only paid for a limited number of days. If the claimant needs another hardship payment after this, they’ll have to reapply. The conditions imposed for a hardship claim are so onerous most are refused. Should a claimant be “lucky” enough to be granted a hardship payment it will amount to 60% of JSA, about £38pw. Hardship payments are treated as a loan/debt to be recovered through any other benefits paid, assuming the claimant actually manages to get any payments at some future date. For example, a single person aged 25 or over receiving £311.55 a month will have £124.62 deducted as repayment of the hardship loan.

****

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28883892

August 22, 2014

Food poverty: Experts issue malnutrition health warning

By Michael Buchanan Social Affairs Correspondent, BBC News

More people are suffering from malnutrition as a result of worsening food poverty, experts have warned. The Faculty of Public Health said conditions like rickets were becoming more apparent because people could not afford quality food in their diet. It comes after health figures recently revealed a 19% increase in the number of people admitted to hospital with malnutrition over the past year.

The UK has 3.8 million children in extreme poverty. Charities such as the Trussell Trust report growing need for food banks but say that some of the items donated can be of poor quality. Dr. Middleton said: “If the nutritional diseases are markers of a poor diet, the food banks are markers of extreme poverty – the evidence from Trussell Trust suggests the biggest group of users are hard working poor families who have lost benefits, live on low and declining wages and or they have fallen foul of draconian benefits sanctions which propel them into acute poverty and hunger. This is a disastrous and damning indictment on current welfare policy and a shame on the nation. The food banks are providing a real and valued service staving off actual hunger – they are actually keeping people alive.”

Data from the Health and Social Care Information Centre showed the number of those admitted to hospital in England and Wales had risen from 5,469 to 6,520 over the past year. Vice president of the Faculty of Public Health, John Middleton, said food-related ill health was getting worse through extreme poverty and the use of food banks. “It’s getting worse because people can’t afford good quality food. It’s getting worse where malnutrition, rickets and other manifestations of extreme poor diet are becoming apparent,” he said. The faculty recently claimed that UK food prices had risen by 12% since 2007. It also noted that in the same period, UK workers had suffered a 7.6% fall in wages.

Summer food schemes

Separately, numerous schemes have been running throughout the summer holidays to help families feed their children. The Kellogg’s Holiday Breakfast Club, the Fun and Food In School Holidays initiative and the Ashram Housing Association’s Holiday Kitchen are among the schemes running across the UK.

Muna Choudhury from Ashram said: “We heard from the families we work with the summer holidays can prove to be a struggle. Families were finding it difficult to find affordable activities and to provide extra meals.”

Manchester GP Aisha Awan said healthy food did not have to be expensive, suggesting tinned food – as long as it was not high in sugar or salt. She added: “If you buy them [tins] they keep for longer – they’re often a cheaper option for people who might be on a budget.”

The signs of being malnourished
The main symptom of malnutrition is rapid weight loss – usually 5-10% within a few months. Other signs include: weak muscles, constantly feeling tired, an increase in illnesses or infections, stunted growth in children, changes in behaviour becoming irritable, sluggish and anxious.

Source: NHS Choices

****

Yes, the good old Nasty Party must be so proud of itself. After all, when Labour were kicked out in 2010 there were only 800,000 children in poverty. Now the number is increasing by about 800 a day, and the total is heading for 4 million! To add to the Nasty Party’s sense of achievement, those children are in “extreme poverty” which must be much more of an achievement than just plain old “poverty” which was all the last lot could manage. Yippee! And another crate of bubbly all round!

What’s more, a lot of children have now got rickets, thanks to the noble efforts of George Smith who has ensured that claiming benefits is now such a bureaucratic minefield that hundreds of thousands of claimants have managed to get their only source of money cut off. (Notice that Smith himself has never had to starve.)

Yes! Here we are in 2014 with rickets, starvation, poverty and homelessness all on the rise!

Must make all those Tory millionaires sitting round the Cabinet table (who have never missed a meal in their lives) really happy.

Are Guardian writers fools? Are their readers foul-mouthed imbeciles?

I don’t normally read the Guardian. But yesterday, with nothing better to do, I went to the Guardian website.

There was an extraordinary article by some wild-eyed old bat claiming hundreds of thousands of people in Britain were starving. The title of the article was  “Yes, people can starve in benefit-sanctions Britain”

And the subtitle: “Unemployed, disabled and chronically ill people are going hungry – because a sadistic government is removing the money they need to eat”.

The article ended up with: “It seems a particular level of sadism to remove the money people need to eat and act surprised when they are hungry. A new report is just another excuse for those in power to shirk responsibility, to blame the people they have already degraded once and who cannot defend themselves. A general election is coming. Its citizens are starving, and this government’s priority is denial”

All pretty serious and angry stuff.

Yet the loony writer is claiming that thousands are starving at a time when 46,300 immigrants a month are pouring into Britain many of whom are having little trouble finding jobs if they want to work and most of whom are astonished at the huge amounts of money they get from us in tax credits and child credits and all sorts of other benefits. Moreover, there are thousands more in Calais, all ready to risk their lives to come to Benefits Britain rather than stay in any of the 27 other EU countries.

hunger 2

 So, reports of thousands of Brits starving might be ever so slightly exaggerated.

And the idiotic Archbishop of Canterbury, no doubt an avid Guardianista, said something about conditions in Britain being like the Congo. Pity the dopey clergyman didn’t ask himself why so many people from the Congo are trying to get into Britain and so few people from Britain are trying to get into the Congo.

hunger

As for the readers commenting on the writer’s crazed anti-government rant, they do seem to be rather stupid and foul-mouthed. Here are just a few of the hundreds of the more than absurd comments made by supposedly ‘educated’ Guardian readers:

“It is apparent to anyone who gives a fuck that sanctioning people and removing benefits will cause them to be unable to sustain themselves. Those that argue the toss simply don’t care”

“I’m assuming you didn’t read this bit of the article – either that or you simply couldn’t give a shit about what this bastard government is doing”

“Yes the Tories are scum. What they are doing is child abuse. A revolting and brutal government”

“The DWP and the so-called ‘Job Centres’ in their existing forms need to be completely wiped out and rebuilt from scratch. The evidence indicates that the entire system is corrupt, and managed by psychopaths”

“I agree with this 100%. Many people I know are suffering at the hands of the DWP and some have died thanks benefit sanctions and delays. Why are evildoers Duncan Smith and Lord Freud still in their place ?”

“The ConDemns are in my view as bad as the Nazis in their systematic murder of the people of this country…Adolf Hitler and all his cronies would feel quite at home in this country these day….”

 “This govt disgusts me and IDS is maybe the biggest panto villain out there, except the nightmare is real!!”

“Lots of good comments on this. And half a dozen complete and utter heartless, ignorant, totally shitty tw*ts who would doubtless kick a malnourished kid into the path of a bus rather than shell out any of their bloated salaries to help”

So, returning to the two questions: Are Guardian writers fools? Are their readers foul-mouthed imbeciles?

I think the answer to both has to be a resounding YES!

Will the ‘S’ ever hit the ‘F’?

Amidst all the bickering between the liars and fools in LibLabCon about whether the deficit is going up or down, our rulers are careful to avoid focusing too much on our debt. Our debt, of course, increases as long as there is a deficit. Perhaps the number we should be worrying about is debt, not deficit?

national debt 1

Our debt has more than doubled under the useless Coalition from about £700bn to £1.5trn. This doesn’t look terribly good for Britain. Moreover, we’re now paying around £1bn a week in interest on our £1.5trn debt. You could fund an awful lot of schools, hospitals and some wonderful pensions if we didn’t have to pay this £1bn a week in interest.

So, should we panic? That’s not certain. If we look at debt as a percentage of GDP, then the picture doesn’t look so worrying:

national debt 3

Although by 2017, our debt will probably reach 100% of GDP and that’s not so great.

And if we look at our level of interest payments compared to GDP, again the picture doesn’t look too disastrous:

national debt 4

Our interest payments are ‘only’ just over 3% of GDP, which is not high by historical standards.

So, can we all relax? Difficult question.

What’s clear is that once a government gives a benefit or service, it’s almost impossible to take it away because of the howls of protest from the mainstream media always eager to find a victim of ‘vicious government cuts’.

It’s also clear that with unlimited immigration and the Eurozone in meltdown needing ever more of our money, public spending will continue to rise and will never fall.

Moreover, with 54% of the population getting more in services and benefits than they pay in tax, we’ll never get a government with the political will to control spending.

It’s easy to make alarmist predictions about lenders refusing us any more credit, impending bankruptcy and a collapse of the pound. But the most probable scenario is that we just muddle along as the ruling elites pretend to govern while just filling their pockets with as much of our money as they can and as our country is increasingly concreted over to make way for the immigrant hordes who will eventually outnumber us and turn our country into a crowded, squalid Third World hell-hole like the countries they’ve come from.

So, probably no panic. Just gradual and depressingly irreversible decline.

And, if you have children – tell them to borrow as much as they can, have a wonderful time at uni and then emigrate to Canada, Australia or New Zealand on graduation leaving their debts and the lousy British weather behind them. That’s what I would do if I had my time again.