Snouts in the Trough

Some years ago, before I was blacklisted for writing two books (RIP-OFF! and PLUNDERING THE PUBLIC SECTOR) exposing stupidity, greed and waste in the management consultancy industry, I was sent to a Southeast Asian country to work on a project in the maintenance division of their national airline. I won’t give you the name of the airline or show any pictures of their planes. But there may be more than a hint in the title of today’s post.

The airline had a bit of a problem. Following a number of exciting in-flight incidents covered up by pilots, the airline risked losing its FAA approval to fly into US airports. That could have led to a ban from European airports as well. So this would have been a disaster both for the airline and for national pride.

There were two parts to our job. Firstly, to knock the maintenance department into shape so that there were fewer life-threatening events. But there was also what management consultants like to call a ‘vision’. This was to make the maintenance department so effective that other airlines would subcontract some of their major plane overhauls to this airline as its labour costs were much lower than those for the major carriers.

On my second day on the first phase of the project, I accompanied one of our aircraft maintenance specialists to check the stock of spare parts. Armed with long lists of items like wings and landing gear, worth many millions of dollars, that should have been there we set off through the blazing tropical heat for the stores building. It was huge and rather empty apart from a lot of large hairy spiders who seemed most displeased by people disturbing their afternoon nap. Clearly the spiders were not used to people coming into the stores building.

As for all the spare parts that should have been there – well, who knows? Part of the problem was that due to the national habits of laziness and administrative incompetence, many parts may have been used but not marked off on the stock lists. But there is also a thriving market in aircraft parts, and it looked like the maintenance department managers had been hugely enriching themselves by flogging off wings and suchlike. Moreover, some parts marked as ‘new’ were clearly not new at all. Probably the new parts had been flogged off and replaced by much cheaper refurbished ones, making somebody very rich in the process.

But when we reported our findings to the directors of the maintenance division, there was obviously a bit of a problem. They were the ones getting rich from the aircraft spare parts scam. As you might have expected, within two days of our final report, we were all on a plane home (thankfully not with that airline) as the directors of the maintenance division had no intention of letting anyone spoil their lucrative criminal enterprise.

Britain is corrupt – as Mr Straw and Mr Rifkind have both helpfully confirmed. But our corruption is small beer compared to the widespread venality in most developing countries. The West clearly has some economic problems at the moment and the pundits are forever blethering on about the rise of Asia. But corruption is so endemic in most Asian countries that everything they do will always be affected by it.

Some Indian company has recently announced it will be constructing the world’s tallest luxury residential flats building in Bombay (Mumbai) at 117 floors:

So, what can we expect? Substandard steel supplied by corrupt contractors and approved by corrupt building inspectors? Substandard concrete supplied by corrupt contractors and approved by corrupt building inspectors? Well, you get the picture. After all, would you fly in a passenger jet made by Indians or Pakistanis?

So, the supposed experts’ predictions of the West’s demise and the coming “Asian Century” may be a little premature. Corruption will always be Asia’s Achilles Heel.

One of the examples usually given by the supposed ‘experts’ of the dangers of deflation and economic stagnation is Japan. The economic pundits are forever talking and writing about “Japan’s lost decade”. But do the ‘experts’ really understand what has has actually happened in Japan over the last 10 years or so?

Here are a couple of relevant data points:

1. People’s spending decreases after they enter their mid fifties:

(click on charts to see more clearly)

Although this chart is from the US, it applies in almost any developed country – after people pass the age of 54, they tend to spend less money on “stuff”.

2. Japan has an ageing and declining population:

This means that the Japanese are likely to spend less. Therefore any decline in GDP may not be proof of “a lost decade” but just a natural result of changes in demographics.

We also have an ageing population in Britain. But our rulers have chosen to deal with it by opening the borders to a tsunami of immigration – 46,000 people every month (one million every two years) – about half of them unskilled benefits scroungers from filthy, corrupt, crime-ridden, violent Third World hell-holes who just happen to hate us and everything about our society apart from our over-generous welfare system, free healthcare, free schooling, free housing, free everything. This has led to a rapid population increase in Britain, overcrowding and a virtual collapse in the NHS and our schools. Meanwhile, our rulers have borrowed and spent £100bn a year to pay benefits, housing and public services for all these millions of immigrants and claimed “look how much our economy is growing!” 

The Japanese, on the other hand, have decided to not let their country become an overcrowded, heavily-indebted Third World sewer and so their population has peaked and even started to go down as has their GDP. Is that a bad thing? Less congestion. Less overcrowding. Less pressure on housing and public services. Less borrowing.

Yes, the Japanese do have issues to deal with, in particular how to care for so many elderly.

But maybe there hasn’t been the “lost decade” the economics experts like to shove in our faces when warning us about the supposed ‘dangers’ of deflation. All we’re seeing in Japan might be the natural decline in spending as a population ages but doesn’t allow itself to be invaded by millions of people who would have no interest in Japan’s values and would absolutely refuse to integrate into Japanese society.

So, which route would you have preferred for Britain? The one chosen by our rulers which is turning our once green and peaceful country into a crowded, concrete-covered, violent, bankrupt Third World cesspit? Or the one chosen by Japan’s rulers – keep the borders closed and manage the gradual decline in population and GDP?

Personally, I’d much prefer Japan’s solution. I believe Japan hasn’t had a “lost decade” at all. But we have definitely lost our country and we can never get it back.

For most of my life, I was too busy trying to earn a living to question what I read in the papers or heard on TV. It’s only since I’ve been blacklisted as a whistleblower and started writing books that I’ve realised what total and utter b*ll*x many supposed ‘experts’ feed us. This is why I write the blog – to try to tell the truth the mainstream media never mentions about what is really happening to our country.

(Apologies, the Comment function still seems to be blocked by spammers. A pity as I’d have loved to have read the comments on some of the articles over the last few days. Until the problem is fixed, if readers wish, they can email comments to me at david.craig54@yahoo.co.uk and I’ll post them in the blog)

(I’m leaving this post up for a second day as I believe this really is the “big issue” confronting us)

In 2001, there were about 1.6 million M*sl*ms in Britain. By 2011, this had shot up to 2.78 million. By 2014, at 3.2 million, there were twice as many M*sl*ms in Britain as there were just 13 years earlier. With Britain’s M*sl*m population doubling every 13 years, by 2030 there will be over 7 million M*sl*ms in Britain.

Our rulers and the politically correct will argue that as M*sl*ms only make up around 5% of the population, they aren’t a threat to our way of life even though within 15 years M*sl*ms will account for over 10% of the population. But what the ruling elites, the politically correct and the bien pensants deliberately overlook is the concentration of M*sl*ms in certain areas which gives them massive political power, well in excess of their percentage of the population as a whole.

Although M*sl*ms only make up about 5% of the population overall, in many cities where M*sl*ms are still in a minority M*sl*m births are far outstripping births of the ethnic British:

(These figures are from the 2011 census. Due to uncontrolled immigration and M*sl*ms’ higher birth rates, the percentages of M*sl*ms will have increased considerably in just the last 4 years since 2011)

In some local authorities, M*sl*ms account for around a third of the population:

(These figures are from the 2011 census. Due to uncontrolled immigration and M*sl*ms’ higher birth rates, the percentages of M*sl*ms will have increased considerably in just the last 4 years since 2011)

Once M*sl*ms are close to 30% of the population in any area, thanks to tribal loyalties, coercion to vote for M*sl*m candidates and extensive postal vote fraud, that essentially gives the M*sl*m community total control over those areas.

Thanks to the shenanigans in Tower Hamlets, we can already see that M*sl*m political control will bring us all the most colourful aspects of political life from those beacons of democracy – Pakistan, Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Somalia – voting fraud and voter intimidation; widespread corruption leading to massive enrichment of M*sl*m political leaders and their business cronies; Trojan Horse takeovers of schools resulting in segregation and oppression of girls, and religious indoctrination replacing the teaching of science and technology; female genital mutilation; polygamy; a huge growth in first-cousin marriages giving an increase in birth defects and a decrease in overall IQ levels of 10 to 16 points; complete failure to accept or adopt any British values and, of course, low educational achievement leading to unemployment (economic inactivity) levels of over 50% for men and 95% for women, poverty, criminality and social unrest.

In addition, as Rotherham, Bradford, Halifax, Oxford and many other cities have shown, crimes by M*sl*m men such as gang-rape, gang-sodomisation and torture of non-M*sl*m girls will be tolerated and covered up in the interests of ‘social cohesion’ with M*sl*m policemen keeping the perpetrators well-informed about any potential police action against them should the police even dare to confront such problems

There’s the well-known question: How do you eat an elephant?

So, even though British M*sl*ms only account for about 5% of the British population and violent *slam*sts may only account for say 5% (60 million) of the world’s 1.2 billion M*sl*ms, British M*sl*ms and *sl*mic militants and are ‘eating the elephant‘ – taking over our country and the world bit by bit.

In Britain, our M*sl*ms are taking control of at least 10 local councils and some major cities. In the Middle East, ISIL already have large parts of Syria and Iraq and have now moved into Libya. They’re also active in Egypt and the Yemen and will soon move into Jordan and the Lebanon. In Africa, Boko Haram are spreading outside Nigeria into Cameroon and other neighbouring countries.

So, we should give thanks to Tower Hamlets, Rotherham and ISIL – they have all helped show us what the future for our country and the world looks like. And I, for one, don’t like what I see and feel obliged to speak out against our rulers’ cowardly capitulation to the *sl*mist takeover of our country and our world.

Am I really the only person who can see what’s happening?

While we in the West grovel every time some bearded lunatic from a primitive death cult masquerading as a religion makes demands on us to give up our traditions and freedoms, the Chinese don’t appear to be as politically correct as us.

There’s a story doing the rounds about a Chinese crackdown on the mad mullahs in one of its most rebellious (M*sl*m, of course) provinces. Here’s the story from two different sources:

China has forced the imams of Xinjiang to dance in the street, and swear to an oath that they will not teach religion to children as well telling them that prayer is harmful to the soul.

In China, imams are being forced to dance, at the same time being made to make an oath to keep children away from religion – public servants are forced to brandish the slogan that “our income comes from the CKP (Chinese Communist Party) not from Allah”.

The imams of the mosques in the Xinjiang (East Turkestan) have been forced to gather in a square dancing en masse. State Chinese news have said that in the name of “civilization” the imams have been forced to dance in the town square. At the same time they were forced to chant out slogans such as “peace of the country gives peace to the soul”. Many of the imams were forcibly given Chinese flags – the same demonstration also included university students.

During the speeches, young people were told to stay away from mosques, and that the prayer was harmful to one’s health and instead were encouraged to dance. Female teachers were instructed to teach children to stay away from religious education and made to swear an oath that they will keep children away from religion.

https://defence.pk/threads/china-forces-imams-to-dance-in-street.359474/

 (Apparently, these sorts of large group exercising sessions are popular in China. I guess they’re a kind of political and social control. But, of course, they’re humiliating for mad mullahs as dancing and music, like just about everything enjoyable in life, is ‘haram’:

Here’s the second source:

Rabat – In the Muslim majority district of Xinjiang on Monday, imams were forced by the Chinese state to dance in the street holding banners that read “our income comes from the CKP not from Allah.” 

The imams were also made to swear an oath that they would not teach religion to children on the grounds that prayer “is unhealthy and harmful to the soul”. Teachers in the district were forced to take a similar oath, also swearing to teach their students to stay away from mosques.

In addition to the banners, the imams were also made to chant statements exalting the state such as “peace of the country gives peace to the soul.”

This latest indignity comes after over half a decade of oppression by the Chinese state in the Xinjiang region, known by activists as East Turkestan, which has been autonomous since 1955 and is home to Uighur Muslims, a Turkish-speaking minority. Recently, China has increased its religious repression in the region, with human rights groups claiming that China has been using anti-terrorism as an excuse.

China has gone so far as to ban religious practices and icons, including clothing, in government buildings and to ban women in hijabs and burqas from using public transportation, as well as make it illegal for students and government officials to observe Ramadan

https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2015/02/151682/imams-forced-dance-street-religiously-repressed-xianjang/

He-he-he-he! Ha-ha-ha-ha!

Pity our rulers don’t have the guts to tell “British” M*sl*ms to accept our traditions or get out. “Fit in or f*** off!” should be our policy. After all, there are about 54 M*sl*m countries in the world “British” M*sl*ms could move to if they don’t like the way we do things in Britain. 

The only trouble is that they’re almost all violent, dangerous, poverty-stricken, corrupt, stinking, crowded, excrement-covered hell-holes without Britain’s wonderful benefits system, free schooling, free healthcare, free housing, free speech (for M*sl*ms only), free everything.

As for the M*sl*m practice of gang-raping, gang-sodomising and torturing non-M*sl*m girls. If they did that in China, they’d get a bullet in the back of the head. But in Britain they’re encouraged for decades by social workers, the police and local politicians who desperately protect the rapists against discovery, prosecution and punishment in the interests of social harmony and promoting multi-culturalism.

(As it’s the weekend, something a little less serious today – a day on which, like on  every other day our national debt increases by a mere £274m as our financially incontinent rulers borrow ever more money to waste https://www.nationaldebtclock.co.uk/ )

Apparently our magazines are full of articles by supposed ‘relationship experts’ telling us why people are attracted to each other and what’s the basis of a stable long-term relationship. Though, in today’s society who knows what ‘long-term’ now means – weeks? months?

But one thing I suspect these relationship experts seldom if ever mention is ‘shared morality’. By that I mean, people who believe that you should be decent to others and try to get with them will gravitate towards others with a similar morality while people who believe others are to be used, trampled on and then cast aside in their rush to further their own careers – total utter bastards (TUBs) – will similarly gravitate to others with those kinds of beliefs.

I don’t mean that TUBs consciously say to themselves ‘I like using and discarding other people and so need to find a partner with a similar approach to life’ but rather that TUBs will naturally feel more comfortable with partners who are also TUBs.

I worked for many years in management consultancy. There are two main types of people in management consultancy. There are the footsoldiers (what we used to call ‘billing foodder’) – fairly decent people who would happily work for £1,000 to £1,500 per week and who could be charged out to our useless clients – big companies and incompetent bureaucracies like the NHS and Ministry of Defence – at £7,000 to £10,000 per week, producing endless streams of money for the consultancies’ partners and directors.

As in any walk of life, where there are huge amounts of money to be earned extremely quickly by those of quite modest talents provided they are sufficiently cunning, consultancy attracts quite a lot of TUBS – people who will lie and cheat and stab you in the back and slander you and claim credit for things they had nothing to do with and make sure someone else was in the way when a project went t*ts up and a scapegoat was needed in their desperate attempts to grab huge amounts of the cash that was rolling in.

At our annual summer and Christmas parties at various castles and luxury hotels in Britain and abroad, you’d meet the TUBs’ partners, who were generally as arrogant, snobbish and unpleasant as the TUBs and would spend most of the time boasting about their numerous houses and fabulous holidays and brilliant children going to the most expensive schools etc etc.

But while the TUBs’ partners enjoyed the benefits of being with a money-grabbing TUB, they often didn’t seem to realise  that there might be a downside. because a few years later, at the next company bash, while the billing fodder would turn up with the same partners, you’d find that the TUBs were frequently with a different, usually younger and more attractive partner, the original partner having been unceremoniously dumped when the TUB could get his or her fingers into a better model.

My wife kept contact with a few TUBs’ former partners and a common theme we found was the shock and surprise that they felt when their TUB behaved like a TUB towards them rather than towards other people.

So, if you or anyone you know is thinking of getting together with a TUB. Read what it says in the tin. And if it says ‘TUB’, while there may be temporary advantages in being with a TUB – money, social position etc – a TUB will always behave like a TUB and that makes the TUB’s partner just another person to be used and thrown aside. Remember – once a TUB, always a TUB.