We all know that our great rulers Obama and Cameron (Obameron) have a clear strategy on Syria – give military help and arms to the “nice, moderate” Syrian rebels:
Unfortunately, Obameron haven’t a clue who the “nice moderate” Syrian rebels are:
Obameron did try to create an army of “nice, moderate” rebels and launched a $500m programme to train them. But things didn’t work out as planned. Defense Secretary Ashton Carter admitted this year that only 60 so-called “moderate” Syrian rebels were currently being trained by the U.S. in the $500 million program that had intended to put 3,000 rebels into action.
In an absolute classic understatement, Carter told the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC): “The number 60, as you all recognize, is not an impressive number. The number is much smaller than we hoped for at this point.”
The $500 million Syrian training program authorized by Congress was intended to train and equip up to 5,400 fighters annually, with about 3,000 projected to be ready by the end of this year.
SASC Chairman Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who earlier gave a scathing critique of the Obama administration’s entire approach to the campaign against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), said “I got to tell you that after four years, Mr. Secretary, that is not a very impressive number”.
As for the few that were trained, the first wave of “New Syrian Force” fighters was ambushed by al-Qaeda and wiped out, with many of them killed, kidnapped, or MIA. No one at the Pentagon seems to know what happened to the second wave after they handed American vehicles and ammunition over to al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front in exchange for safe passage.
Anyway, Mr Putin seems to have got tired of Obameron’s bungling incompetence and has done what Obameron should have done years ago – launched air strikes backed up by an on-the-ground offensive.
At the recent UN meeting, Putin explained his reasons for acting: “It is now obvious that the power vacuum created in some countries of the Middle East and North Africa led to the emergence of anarchy areas. Those immediately started to be filled with extremists and terrorists.
Tens of thousands of militants are fighting under the banners of the so-called “Islamic State.” Its ranks include former Iraqi servicemen who were thrown out into the street after the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Many recruits also come from Libya, a country whose statehood was destroyed as a gross violation of the U.N. Security Council Resolution 1973.
And now the ranks of radicals are being joined by the members of the so-called “moderate” Syrian opposition supported by Western countries. First, they are armed and trained, and then they defect to the Islamic State”.
Obameron are, naturally outraged that Putin has exposed their uselessness and cowardice. So, rather than accepting Putin’s invitation to join forces against ISIL (as Russia and the West did against Hitler), Obameron have gone off in a sulk and are trying to start a new war with Russia:
Most ludicrously, Obameron are accusing Russia of attacking “moderate” Syrian rebels. I wonder which ones those are. Meanwhile in a display of gobstopping cynicism, Turkey’s leader Erdogan is criticising Russia for attacking non-ISIL Syrians while he uses the excuse of ISIL to bomb Kurdish rebels as a way of ensuring his re-election at the end of the year.
In all this mess, (as one reader wrote the other day) “I’m rootin’ for Putin”. Uncle Vlad the Impaler seems to be the only person with any sense and any strategy. And the more supposed “moderates” Vlad kills, the better place the world will be.
Imagine that some Israelis rounded up 12 Palestinians and then tortured and murdered them while, of course, publicly raping the women before they were killed. Imagine the international outrage. Imagine the calls for a boycott of anything produced in Israel. Imagine the demands for the Israelis to be prosecuted for ‘crimes against humanity’.
But, of course, the Israelis wouldn’t do anything like that. They’re too civilised. But we know who does do things like that.
Here’s story carefully ignored by almost all the UK media. I found it in the Gospel Herald (don’t ask). Please read it and please share my sense of helpless outrage at the lies and hypocrisy of our rulers and media who salivate over every opportunity to attack civilised, democratic Israel while deliberately ignoring the ongoing genocide of Christians all across the Middle East as our M*sl*m friends do what they do best – torture, rape and murder.
Here’s the story:
Twelve Christians have been brutally executed by the *sl*mic State, including the 12-year-old son of a Syrian ministry team leader who had planted nine churches, because they refused to renounce the name of Jesus Christ and embrace *sl*m. The martyrs were faithful to the very end; right before one woman was beheaded by the terror group, she appeared to be smiling slightly as she said, “Jesus!”
According to Christian Aid Mission, a humanitarian group which assists indigenous Christian workers in their native countries, the horrific murders took place on August 28 in an unnamed village outside Aleppo, Syria.
“In front of the team leader and relatives in the crowd, the Islamic extremists cut off the fingertips of the boy and severely beat him, telling his father they would stop the torture only if he, the father, returned to *sl*m,” Christian Aid revealed. “When the team leader refused, relatives said, the ISIS militants also tortured and beat him and the two other ministry workers. The three men and the boy then met their deaths in crucifixion.”
They were killed for refusing to return to *sl*m after embracing Christianity, as were the other eight aid workers, including two women, according to Christian Aid. The eight were taken to a separate site in the village and asked if they would return to *sl*m. However, after they refused to renounce Christ, the women, ages 29 and 33, were raped before the crowd summoned to watch, and then all eight were beheaded.
They prayed as they knelt before the *sl*mic State militants, according to the ministry leader Christian Aid assists, who spoke with relatives and villagers while visiting the site.
“Villagers said some were praying in the name of Jesus, others said some were praying the Lord’s Prayer, and others said some of them lifted their heads to commend their spirits to Jesus,” the ministry director told Christian Aid. “One of the women looked up and seemed to be almost smiling as she said, ‘Jesus!'”
In a manner reflective of Christ’s crucifixion, the bodies of those killed were then hung on crosses for display.
The twelve martyrs are among thousands of Christians who have been ransomed, tortured, beheaded and killed over the past year by the *sl*mic State, a hardline M*sl*m group determined to wipe Christianity off the Middle Eastern map.
The jihadist group has also destroyed countless time-honored Christian monasteries, manuscripts, and holy sites in an attempt to eradicate the faith.
In Syria alone, the Christian population has plunged by nearly two-thirds since the country’s civil war started in 2011. In Iraq, the Christian population is teetering on extinction, dwindling from around 1.5 million in 2003 to well below 200,000 now.
“It is like going back 1,000 years seeing the barbarity that Christians are having to live under. I think we are dealing with a group which makes Nazism pale in comparison and I think they have lost all respect for human life,” Patrick Sookhdeo, founder of Barnabas Fund a charity which seeks to help Syrian Christians.
“Crucifying these people is sending a message and they are using forms of killing which they believe have been sanctioned by Sharia law,” he added. “For them what they are doing is perfectly normal and they don’t see a problem with it.”
Many thanks to all those who sent me links about the wonderful future facing us as our continent becomes increasingly *sl*micised. As I wrote yesterday, I believe this is the most important challenge facing us. However, to avoid becoming monotonous, I thought it important to write about other things – both serious and trivial.
Today, hopefully to lighten my normal mood of gloom and doom, I wanted to show an email I’ve received from the publishers of a magazine called MoneyWeek. As usual, they’re trying to flog some overpriced investment newsletter almost guaranteed to lose you money. After all, if the MoneyWeek newsletter writers really knew how to get rich, why would they waste their time telling other people?
I found the email jaw-droppingly amateurish, patronising and insulting and would never buy anything from a company that wrote to me using such a condescending tone:
You’re beginning to
worry me
Dear David Craig,
Did you miss our offer?
I only ask since my records show that you haven’t followed the scores of investors who’ve made a huge saving on their new MoneyWeek subscription.
Editor-in-Chief Merryn, Editor John and I have devised a quick and simple way to give you access to our most exclusive research. It was right after our recent discussion on where the biggest growth opportunities now lie for you as a UK investor.
For Merryn, that’s China. For John, it’s solar power and alternative energy.
They’re both long-term, wealth-buildings ideas – exactly the kind of common sense advice we’ve always published in MoneyWeek… and the kind of advice that is so hard to find elsewhere in Britain.
So why not lock in your discount now and secure your subscription today?
I can’t make it much easier for you. Let’s review: You’re being offered a big discount on the regular price – and world-class investment ideas from some of Britain’s brightest financial minds delivered directly to your post box each week.
If you’ve already taken advantage of the offer, then please excuse the intrusion on your day.
I cannot imagine why you wouldn’t take advantage of this offer.
If something else is holding you back, let me make it simple. If you ARE serious about improving your financial life and making better-informed investment decisions, then it’s not complicated.
The single-most important step you can take toward a more secure financial future is getting high-quality advice and information from people who genuinely care about your welfare.
If you read the interview I sent you a few days ago, you know Merryn and John could easily be making hundreds of thousands of pounds working in the City for a big firm. But they don’t. They write the magazine each week for everyday investors like you. Why?
Because they believe in MoneyWeek. They believe that you, like all British investors, deserve unbiased and useful ideas you can actually put to work for you.
That’s what the magazine is about. And having known them both for the last ten years, I know how committed they are to the project. That’s why I’m asking you to commit today. And I’ve made it as easy as possible.
If you’re still not sure, that’s fine. It’s unlikely there’s anything I can say at this point to change your mind.
But if you enjoy reading Merryn and John’s work – and want to know where the see the biggest investment gains coming over the next decade – then I strongly suggest you at least read their recent interviews.
Probably like most people, I have spent much of my life just trying to earn a living. So I’ve never had much time to think about how we are ruled and what drives our rulers. But since I was blacklisted by the management consultancy industry about ten years ago for writing two whistle-blowing books – RIP-OFF! and PLUNDERING THE PUBLIC SECTOR – I’ve had time to explore how badly we are governed and why we are so badly governed. Hence my books like SQUANDERED How Gordon Brown is wasting over one trillion pounds of our money and GREED UNLIMITED: How David Cameron protects the elites while squeezing the rest of us.
These books along with my other books – THE GREAT EUROPEAN RIP-OFF and FLEECED try to show how our rulers’ completely mistaken assumptions about how economies work led to the 2008 financial crash and will lead to the coming sovereign debt crisis.
But more recently, I’ve realised that our misguided rulers are on the road to destroying, not just our economy, but our whole civilisation. This is not because of some mad NWO Bilderberg conspiracy or because they’re really lizards from outer space in disguise. It’s because our rulers believe in completely different assumptions to the rest of us.
Today, I thought it might be useful to briefly try to expose three of the main assumptions our rulers believe (which will lead to the destruction of our civilisation) and suggest why these assumptions are wrong:
Assumption 1: Nation states have been responsible for past catastrophic wars. If nation states can be replaced by transnational organisations like the EU superstate, there will be no more wars
Reality 1: It was not nation states, but the arrogance, supremacism and brutality of Germany and Japan which caused the two worst wars in human history. Most people need to identify with a recognisable community like a country and will never agree to be ruled by the corrupt, bureaucratic, undemocratic transnational institutions our rulers are so keen to impose on us. Just as the Soviet Union collapsed, so will eventually the EU – the sooner the better
Assumption 2: With its birth-rate below replacement levels and its declining population, Western Europe needs to import workers so there are sufficient wage earners to support the growing number of retirees
Reality 2: Technology and automation are hugely increasing worker productivity and mean that fewer workers will be needed in the future to support the retired generation. Moreover, as older people are healthier than before, many are choosing to work into their late sixties and even their seventies to avoid the boredom of up to 30 years retirement. Furthermore (see Assumption 3), many of the people being imported are culturally, intellectually and socially completely incapable of doing the jobs for which they are being imported
Assumption 3: People across the world are fairly similar and want the same things – peace, jobs, democracy, freedom and rewarding lives
Reality 3: People are not similar. There is, for example, a massive gulf between the IQ levels of Northern (non-M*sl*M) Asia and the West compared to M*sl*m Asia, the Middle East and Africa due to many reasons including the prevalence of first-cousin marriages in areas with lower IQs.
There is also a huge cultural and social chasm between the non-M*sl*m world and the M*sl*m world. Those in the non-M*sl*m world mostly do want the same things – peace, jobs, democracy, freedom and rewarding lives. But just like the Germans and the Japanese in the 20th century, today’s 21st century M*sl*ms believe they are racially superior to all other people and that they have been chosen to dominate non-M*sl*ms – Kaffirs (who are subhuman and whose lives are therefore worth little to nothing compared to the lives of Believers). Moreover, just like the Germans and Japanese in the 20th century, our supremacist M*sl*m friends see bombs, beheadings, bullets and babies as the way to take over the world.
Our leaders’ ludicrously enthusiastic support for the supposed ‘Arab Spring’ (which predictably turned into the *sl*mic Nightmare) was perhaps the one of the most monumental mistakes in history.
Conclusion: Our rulers are leading us to disaster, not as part of some great tin-foil-hat conspiracy, but because they have a set of beliefs about the world which are totally misguided. Moreover, much of the media shares the misguided beliefs of the ruling elites and so anyone who expresses doubts about the coming destruction of our civilisation is immediately branded bad, mad, deluded, racist, or worse.
It will be interesting to see if we can stop our rulers’ rush into catastrophe before it’s too late.
As the mostly *sl*mic hordes pour over our borders, many of our cities are becoming 20% to 30% or more M*sl*m and an epidemic of rape of Western girls and women by the new arrivals is sweeping across Europe.
The situation is so bad in Sweden and Norway that the nationality of rapists is never mentioned and pictures of convicted rapists are only shown in the media on the rare occasion when the rapists are white. Otherwise people might get the ‘wrong impression’. Meanwhile in Germany, rapes by migrants are no longer reported or included in crime statistics. Again, to avoid Germans getting the ‘wrong impression’ of the people flooding into their country. And in Britain, the police and social services have turned a blind eye to thousands upon thousands of gang rapes never taking any action when the perpetrators were from the Religion of Peace.
To avoid being raped (usually gang-raped by ten to fifteen men at a time while many others shout and jeer and egg their friends on to do ever more extreme things to the victims), it seems that Western women must adapt their lifestyle to the new situation rather than the new arrivals accepting our norms. Here’s some advice reportedly given by Dr. Unni Wikan a professor of social anthropology at the University of Oslo, Norway.:
And here’s some more advice reportedly from a professor of *sl*mic Law at a university in Saudi Arabia:
(I don’t know if the picture is of the scholar himself or just one chosen at random)
So, girls and ladies, please take heed of these warnings and change the way you live to adapt to the glories of multi-culturalism, otherwise you may experience more than a few problems:
Meanwhile, the BBC continues to completely ignore the rape epidemic and pump out pro-immigration, *sl*mophiliac propaganda. Today’s ‘big stories’ included a long feature on the ‘courage’ of migrants making the ‘long journey’ to Europe and a piece on a woman who has become the first female fire-fighter in Pakistan. I suppose the Beeb wanted to show us how culturally enlightened Pakistan is becoming. What the BBC didn’t mention was that the unusual side to this latter story was not that the woman had become a fire-fighter, but that she hadn’t yet been gang-raped by her male colleagues.
Oh, and in case you were wondering what I meant by ‘rapeable age’, I guess it’s anywhere between 10 and 60.
There’s a story you might have missed as it wasn’t widely reported in the mainstream media as far as I know.
A couple of weeks ago, around 150 “Britain First” protesters marched through Rotherham. I realise that this was a bit provocative to Rotherham’s M*sl*m community. But given the way Rotherham’s close-knit M*sl*m community remained remarkably silent while many of their men raped, sodomised and tortured at least 1,400 white girls (some as young as twelve) over more than ten years, one might have thought that Rotherham’s M*sl*ms would be shamed into holding a low profile during the “Britain First” demonstration. Not a chance. Instead Rotherham’s M*sl*ms were outraged (as usual) and decided to riot against supposed *sl*mophobia:
Meanwhile, our German friends are enjoying their multi-cultural enrichment. According to the minister in charge of state security in Saarland, some parts of Germany are descending into chaos. Tens of thousands of migrants are roaming freely, stealing as they go, and completely uncontrolled. Once admitted to a refugee camp, they simply disappear, in one way, out at the other end. Those who remain in the camps frequently spread terror, demanding halal food, insulting the female Red Cross employees trying to help them, as they wont be helped by women. If their dietary wishes are not met, the food is thrown to the ground and there are riots. And German police are refusing to reveal how widespread rape is in the migrant camps.
There have been riots in Hamburg, Kassel, and other smaller towns; the police talk of violence against women and children on a massive scale, M*sl*ms are attacking Christians and other faiths, there is open gang warfare among the various ME clans which have come to Germany, Sunnis are fighting Shias, Shias are fighting Sunnis, Afghans are fighting Syrians and Iraqis, Iraqis are fighting Syrians and Afghans etc. ad nauseam. Not altogether surprising that the local yokels are a tad unhappy… But nowadays that appears to be racism!
The Germans have lots of wonderful combined nouns. There’s ‘Weltanschauung’, ‘Zeitgeist’, ‘Bodensangst’ (I made that one up) and ‘Schadenfreude’. Schadenfreude is defined as “pleasure derived by someone from another person’s misfortune”.
There have been two opportunities for lots of schadenfreude over the last few days. First, in Mecca hundreds of mad Muzzies were trampled to death by hundreds of other mad Muzzies as happens every year. There was great wailing and gnashing of teeth. But why? It was clearly God’s will otherwise it wouldn’t have happened, would it? And as for the departed, well they’ll be enjoying the pleasures of Paradise slightly earlier than expected, so they’ll be happy. And one can hardly claim that the world is a poorer place without these lunatics.
Then there’s VW. The German car-maker’s motto was, of course, “Vorsprung durch Teknik” (“Advancement through technology”). For over 30 years, VW has carpet-bombed us with advertising boasting their superior engineering. But now we find that VW couldn’t work out how to build diesel engines that were as clean as their competitors. So instead they fitted about eleven million cars with ‘defeat’ devices to cheat emissions testing:
What is truly incredible is that VW thought they could get away with this. After all, hundreds of VW employees must have known what was happening and all it needed was one disgruntled VW engineer to blow the whistle and the company would be well and truly screwed.
It’s difficult not to experience a rather large amount of schadenfreude at arrogant VW’s entirely self-inflicted agonies:
So, how much will this monumental blunder cost VW?
First there’s the company’s share price:
Fixing eleven million cars at about say £100 to £200 per car will only set the company back about £1bn to £2bn. And Merkel will have been on the phone to other European leaders to tell them that they’re welcome to huff and puff about the VW fraud, but if they take any real action against VW, she will use German economic power to crush them. After all if VW goes down, over 500,000 German jobs will be lost. If that happens, where will Merkel put the 800,000 crazies she’s importing this year to work in German factories? Ooops, Angela’s great plan may be going up in smoke. Lots more schadenfreude.
Cameron, in particular, will have been told in no uncertain terms that, if he wants something from the British renegotiation with the EU, then it’s hands off VW. We can expect lots of heat and noise from the authorities across Europe in the months to come, but don’t expect much action.
However, it will be more difficult for Merkel to intimidate the US. So, there at least, we can look forward to VW getting a well-deserved kicking from the American authorities who will see this as a great opportunity to help General Motors and Ford by crippling VW. Plus swarms of US lawyers will be descending on VW like great white sharks as they join what will possibly be the greatest legal feeding frenzy since the entirely predictable BP Gulf of Mexico disaster:
So, get in the beers and popcorn, relax in front of the TV and enjoy the continuing spectacle of VW’s utter humiliation at the hands of the Americans.
Due largely to the British Empire, our country has been taking in migrants for generations. There have been so many different groups coming here – Indians, Pakistanis, Afro-Caribbeans and others – that it’s difficult to link any clear social changes to any specific group of immigrants.
But Sweden is a different case. Up till the 1970’s there was limited immigration to Sweden. In fact, more people were leaving Sweden than arriving there:
(The blue line is those leaving Sweden, the red line is the number of immigrants arriving in Sweden)
Then the doors were flung open to almost all and sundry. Now around 2,400,000 of Sweden’s 9,700,000 population (about one in four people) are either born abroad or have one or two parents born abroad.
So, who is coming to Sweden? Before the 1970s, the largest foreign-born population in Sweden came from Finland and Poland. But since the 1970s, arrivals in Sweden have been overwhelmingly from countries practising the Religion of Tolerance and Peace:
So, Sweden gives us a good case study of what happens when a country allows in large numbers of people with a quite different culture and quite different social norms than the indigenous population.
Yesterday, I showed an apparent correlation between the number of rapes in Sweden and the rise in immigration:
(The red line is the number of reported rapes and the the grey columns are the number of residence permits handed out to foreigners)
Here are some other crime figures from once peaceful Sweden:
I don’t think the above chart needs any comments or explanations from me.
The Swedish Government and media aggressively oppress anyone who dares express concern about the levels of M*sl*m immigration and their effect on Sweden. So there are quite a few videos on YouTube where worried people express their outrage at what is happening in Sweden.
Here’s one which focuses on the fact that Sweden will me a majority M*sl*m country by 2050
Sweden has sometimes been called the “rape capital of the world”. Although Sweden is a country, not a city, so the description is a bit odd. International comparisons suggest that Sweden has the highest rate of rape of any country apart from Lesotho in the number of rapes per 100,000 inhabitants:
But we have to be careful using such statistics for several reasons. For example, Sweden has a broader definition of sexual assault than many other countries and, were a woman to survive being raped in countries like Pakistan and India, they probably wouldn’t report the rape as the woman would most likely be imprisoned and then raped by the local police and all their friends. That, along with the shame being raped would bring on their families, tends to discourage reporting rape.
So, to assess the frequency of rape in Sweden and who is carrying out all these rapes, we might be better at looking at the trend in the number of rapes over time and compare this to the single most important change in Swedish society over the last 50 years – the decision to become a multi-cultural country by allowing a massive influx of (mostly M*sl*m) immigrants:
Here the red line (right-hand scale) is the number of reported rapes and the grey columns (left-hand scale) are the number of residency permits granted to foreigners each year.
Apologists for immigration claim that the massive rise in rapes is due mainly to women being more likely to report rape now than they would have been 20 or 30 years ago. So, let’s test that idea by comparing the trend in reported rapes between Sweden (the blue line) and the USA (the yellow line):
Ooops! That excuse doesn’t hold water.
It’s odd that in 2008, Sweden’s neighbor Denmark only had 7.3 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants compared to 53.2 in Sweden.
Danish legislation is not very different from Sweden’s, and there is no obvious reason why Danish women should be less inclined to report rape than their Swedish counterparts.
In 2011, 6,509 rapes were reported to the Swedish police — but only 392 in Denmark. The population of Denmark is about half the size of Sweden’s, so even adjusted for size, the discrepancy is significant.
We know that many women don’t report rape. So how many rapes are actually occurring in Sweden every year?
According to figures published by The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brottsförebyggande rådet; known as Brå) — an agency under the Ministry of Justice — 29,000 Swedish women, during 2011, had been raped. That’s about 300 rapes per 100,000 people – around five times the official police figures. But studies from other countries (Britain and Norway) suggest that only around 10% of rapes are ever reported to the police. But let’s give Sweden the benefit of the doubt and stick with the ‘low’ (29,000) figure.
And who is carrying out these rapes? This is difficult to find out as the Swedish authorities class children of immigrants as Swedish citizens and never report the ethnic background of rapists. Since 2000, there has only been one research report on immigrant crime. It was done in 2006 by Ann-Christine Hjelm from Karlstads University.
It emerged that in 2002, 85% of those sentenced to at least two years in prison for rape in Svea Hovrätt, a court of appeals, were foreign born or second-generation immigrants.
A 1996 report by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention reached the conclusion that immigrants from North Africa (Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia) were 23 times as likely to commit rape as Swedish men. The figures for men from Iraq, Bulgaria and Romania were, respectively, 20, 18 and 18. Men from the rest of Africa were 16 times more prone to commit rape; and men from Iran, Peru, Ecuador and Bolivia, 10 times as prone as Swedish men.
So, let’s assume there are now around say 35,000 rapes being committed in Sweden every year and 85% of these (29,750) are being carried out by M*sl*m immigrants. Furthermore, let’s assume that there are around 1,500,000 women in Sweden of ‘ideal rapeable age’ (15 to 35 years old). Then around 2 in every 100 Swedish women will be raped by a M*sl*m immigrant or, more likely, a M*sl*m immigrant gang.
Makes Rotherham seem like a safe place to bring up your daughter in comparison.
(Oh and by the way, another trend is Sweden is a massive increase in gang rapes of young Swedish men. I wonder which ethnic or religious group could be responsible for that?)
(My thanks to a reader for making me aware of the subject of today’s blog)
Anyone who worries about the *sl*mification of Britain is immediately branded a “waaaccciiisssttt” and a “bigot” and accused of *sl*mophobia. Plus we’re told that, as there are ‘only’ 2,706,000 M*sl*ms in Britain, they make up just 4.5% of our population and therefore any talk of an *sl*mic takeover is exaggerated nonsense.
However, our M*sl*m friends are not evenly spread out across the country. They tend to settle in certain areas where there is already a substantial M*sl*m population.
In the 2001 census, there were around 40 parliamentary constituencies where more than 10% of the population classed themselves as ‘M*sl*m’. In the table below, I’ve listed 23 of these 40 constituencies (as many as I could fit on the table) to show how their M*sl*m populations have grown between the 2001 census and the 2011 census:
The key column to look at is the one on the right – the speed of increase. Most have gone up by 30% to 40% or more in just 10 years.
So, should we be worrying about the *sl*mification of Britain? You’ll find the answer to that question in the right-hand column of the above table.
David Craig, on October 8th, 2015
