A heartwarming story today from the once Swedish, but now largely M*sl*m, city of Gothenburg.
Apparently the message “Konvertera eller do” (“Convert or die”) was sprayed outside a pizzeria owned by Assyrian Christians:
The pizzeria is one of a number of businesses in the Tynnered area of the city that have been targeted by graffiti appearing to support the radical Islamist group ISIL in recent weeks.
Around 10,000 Assyrians, a Christian ethnic group originating in the region that is now Syria, Iraq, Iran and Turkey – now live in Sweden.
Representatives of several Assyrian associations called an emergency meeting on Thursday night to discuss ongoing claims that Sweden’s second largest city is becoming a recruitment hub for ISIL which has already targeted the Christian minority in Syria.
As Putin’s forces crush ISIL in Syria, while Obama and Cameron bleat impotently on the sidelines, we can expect hundreds of European Jihadis to come pouring back into Europe to continue their war here.
You might have thought that 9/11 and the London bombings were bad, but in the immortal words of Bachman Turner Overdrive “B-b-b-b-baby you ain’t seen nothing yet”.
Meanwhile in Germany, cleaners at refugee centres are being raped by the subhuman excrement that is flooding into Europe following Angela Merkel’s invitation to 20 million Syrians (and millions more pretending to be from Syria) to come to build a new *sl*mic Caliphate in Europe.
The Third World War between *sl*m and civilisation has truly started – it’s just not clear whose side our rulers are on!
A reader helpfully sent me a link to a YouTube video claiming the EU will be majority M*sl*m by 2050.
In fact, the figures don’t really bear this out. There are officially about 20 million M*sl*ms in the EU (so the real number is probably closer to 25 million). But even this 25 million is only about 5% of the EU’s population. However, we can expect the EU’s M*sl*m population to rise much more rapidly in the future than previously thanks to idiotic Merkel’s massive cock-up invitation to the whole M*sl*m world to move to the EU and yesterday’s disgraceful agreement to allow 74 million M*sl*m Turks visa-free travel to the EU in return for empty promises by Turkey’s increasingly dictatorial and increasingly *sl*mic ruler to possibly slow down the migrant flood.
But even if the EU’s M*sl*m population doubles every 20 years, by 2050 there will be around 100 million M*sl*ms in the EU. That’s pretty frightening. But it’s still ‘just’ 20% of the EU’s population.
So, the overall numbers don’t support the “EU will be majority M*sl*m by 2050” story.
The truly horrifying aspect of the *sl*mic invasion is that it will be concentrated in our major cities and towns, most of which will be majority M*sl*m long before 2050. Sweden’s three main cities – Stockholm, Malmoe and Gothenburg – will be 40% M*sl*m by 2030 (in just 15 years) and 80% M*sl*m by 2050
And here are a few other European cities:
Ooops, our rulers forgot to tell us that this would be the result of their craven surrender to the *sl*mic invasion.
And here are some British ones:
Though the *sl*mification of our towns and cities might move even faster than I predict as ‘white flight’ accelerates.
A few things are clear – the M*sl*m population is growing far too rapidly to integrate into European countries; most M*sl*ms see themselves as M*sl*ms first and foremost and feel no loyalty at all to the countries where they live; many of the new arrivals and their offspring will be completely unsuited to any form of useful employment and most M*sl*ms despise us Kaffirs and consider us as less than human.
Our rulers’ abject and deceitful surrendering of our countries, our history, our culture, our freedoms, our values and our democracies to the invading M*sl*m armies are likely to lead to a dystopia in which our cities and towns have been turned into Third World *sl*mic slums where the few increasingly ageing members of the indigenous population cower in their homes, afraid to venture outside because of their fear of attack by rampaging mobs of young M*sl*m men and in which any white girl leaving her home alone risks gang rape, gang sodomisation, gang torture and possible murder.
Another reader sent me a link to a story about the super-rich buying expensive bolt-holes in New Zealand (a country where just 0.9% of the population is M*sl*m) because they fear an uprising against them. But what they really fear, but dare not say, is civil war breaking out between M*sl*ms and non-M*sl*ms across Europe.
And finally, to cheer us all up, here’s a recent Pat Condell assessment of Europe’s suicide. Have a very Jihadi weekend. Inshallah!
So, the Britain Stronger in Europe (BSE) campaign has launched and has managed to secure none other than the suave, debonair, multi-millionaire retailer and former head of M&S Lord Stuart Rose as its Chairman:
But who are the other key figures – the ‘big beasts’ – of the BSE campaign to cravenly hand over control of our country to the Germans and French?
Well here are some of the other shining beacons of honesty and integrity queuing up to betray our country and the memory of the hundreds of thousands of better men who died in two World Wars to preserve our freedom:
Lord Peter “Try the Backdoor” Mandelscum – the ‘Prince of Darkness’ himself. Possibly the second most loathed person in Britain. A man who once warned us our country faced economic disaster if we didn’t join the euro. When Mandelscum was EU Trade Commissioner, the EU dramatically lowered import tariffs on Russian aluminium further vastly enriching one of Mandelscum’s Russian oligarch friends (on whose yacht Mandelscum had holidayed). Of course, Mandelscum’s spokesperson informed us that Mandelscum had nothing to do with the decision.
Sir Peter Wall, the former head of the British Army, who was a key figure in both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. In case you had forgotten, we lost in both campaigns mainly due to appalling leadership, no clarity of goals and our troops being sent into action shockingly under-equipped with insufficient armoured vehicles and helicopters. Sir Peter, now retired, is available at £5,000 to £10,000 a shot to gives talks on such topics as Strategy, Resilience, Leadership, Crisis Management, Communication, High Command and teamwork. Though I doubt he’ll answer questions on how many British troops were killed or maimed completely unnecessarily under his command.
Former Prime Minister Sir John Major, perhaps best know for his admirable courage in bonking the delectable Edwina “Eggs will Kill You” Currie
Former Prime Minister Tony “(IMHO) Liar and War Criminal” Blair, possibly the most loathed person in Britain. A creature whose blatant lies about Saddam’s supposed WMDs took us into an illegal war making Blair and his chums very rich indeed. And a man who some people believe gave away much of Britain’s previously substantial EU rebate in the hope of ingratiating himself with other EU leaders so that he could become EU president after leaving Downing Street
Possibly the worst Prime Minister Britain has ever had, the economically-illiterate, financially incontinent Gordon “I’ve abolished Boom and Bust” Brown. A man who, with the help of the equally useless Ed Balls, virtually bankrupted Britain by wasting over £1,229,100,000,000 of taxpayers’ money
Not only has the (formerly?) highly respected Lord Rose allied himself with a bunch of people who many might consider to be knaves, thieves, liars and worse, but Lord Rose also seems to have ‘slightly’ changed his views on the EU since becoming Chairman of the BSE campaign. Here are some of Lord Rose’s best EU quotes before and after he became Chairman:
Ooooppps!
Oh dear, Lord Rose, I really think you’ve done yourself no favours by allowing the treacherous scumbags in Britain Stronger in Europe to use you as their figurehead.
Up to the EU ‘in/out’ referendum and beyond, we’re going to be subjected to a lot of heat and noise by the ‘inners’ and ‘outers’ as they both push their case. There will be plenty of lies and dodgy statistics, but it’s unlikely we’ll get any reliable facts. So, I’ll try, in 600 words, to explain why it was right to join the EU in 1973 and why it’s right to leave now.
It was right to join
By the early 1970s, Britain was famously the ‘sick man of Europe’. We’d lost our empire and were in a state of severe decline. Joining the six countries in the Common Market in 1973 along with Ireland and Denmark gave us, as an English-speaking country, a unique opportunity – to become the destination of choice for US and Japanese companies wishing to operate within the Common Market. Hence many US firms and companies like Honda and Nissan set up manufacturing bases here. We were their bridgehead into Europe.
Of course, we were lied to about the real nature of the Common Market. Our rulers claimed we were joining a trading block, while they knew all along that it was a political project: “ever closer union” meant stamping out national differences to create a single European superstate to supposedly rival the US.
‘Outers’ can, of course, point to Norway and Switzerland to argue that Britain could have thrived outside the EU. Possibly. But what’s done is done. Our task now is to look forward and decide what’s in our best interests – staying in or leaving?
It’s right to leave
There are many reasons for leaving. Perhaps these are the most important three?
1. Little to no influence When we joined in 1973, there were just nine countries. As one of the largest members, Britain had considerable influence (although we usually failed to use this effectively). Now with 28 countries (a number likely to grow as the EU tries to expand in Putin’s back yard), Britain has negligible influence. In fact, with the removal of the national veto, we will always be outvoted, often by countries (Romania, Bulgaria) which are little more than mafia fiefdoms
2. Loss of sovereignty Any country that cannot make its own laws, has no influence over its own agriculture, fishing and labour laws and has no control of its borders is no longer an independent country. Many EU countries (Italy, Greece, Spain, Portugal) have been so incompetently and corruptly ruled for so long, that for them membership of the undemocratic, wasteful, corrupt EU is a huge improvement on what happened when they were independent countries. But Britain has a long history of being a free nation that brought democracy to the world. Hundreds of thousands have died to preserve that freedom. Today’s political pygmies have no right to give that freedom away and hand over our country to German rule
3. The EU is the past, the rest of the world is the future The EU’s share of world GDP is collapsing. In 1980, the 28 countries that now make up the EU accounted for 30.3% of world GDP. By 2020 this is forecast to fall to just 15.4% or less:
Slow growth, over-regulation, incompetent leadership are suffocating the EU while the rest of the world rushes ahead. The EU is fast becoming an economic irrelevance.
Moreover, the share of our exports going to EU countries has dropped from 52% in 2003 to 44% and will keep on falling.
Conclusion – It’s time to go
We should let the EU blunder ahead with its ghastly project of creating a United States of Europe (while actually creating a EUSSR). Let them commit economic and political suicide as they use mass immigration, stifling controls on free speech and economic blackmail to force the rest of Europe under German and French control. But we should break free of this increasingly oppressive and outdated horror and build a new future out in the world.
We can survive and thrive without the EU.
But a more interesting question is – can the EU survive and thrive without us?
We all know that immigration is good for us. Right? So countries have to fight hard to be the destination of choice for the incoming (mostly young M*sl*m men) hordes.
Germany and Sweden are doing a great job in attracting the most migrants. Migrants get tons of benefits, free housing, money, food and are allowed to rob and/or rape whoever they want without any fear of punishment as the German and Swedish police have been instructed to neither investigate nor record any crimes committed by migrants in case ordinary people get the wrong idea about the types of subhumans flooding into their countries.
And, of course, in Germany migrants (always apparently men) get the chance of a selfie on their smartphones with none other than the idiot Merkel who has inflicted the migrant catastrophe on Europe with her invitation to 20 million Syrians (and another 20 million pretending to be Syrians) to come to Europe
But just look at what we give them when they come to Benefits Britain:
According to official Home Office guidance, Ashford Borough Council will have a duty to provide every refugee who arrives in the borough with the following…
1. A cash/clothing allowance of £200 – to ensure they have sufficient funds to live on while their claim for benefits is being processed
2. Accommodation which meets local authority standards and will be available on their arrival and is affordable and sustainable
3. Accommodation which is furnished appropriately but not including luxury items. This means food storage, cooking and washing facilities can be provided but the facilities should not include the provision of other white goods or brown goods, i.e. TV’s, DVD players or any other electrical entertainment appliances
4. Registration with utility companies and arrangements for payments
5. A support plan for each family or individual for a 12-month period to facilitate orientation into their new home/area
6. Provision of English language classes which refugees can access within a month of arrival
7. Interpreting services throughout the period of resettlement
8. Assistance with registering for mainstream benefits and services and signposting to other advice and information giving agencies – including:
9. Assistance with registration for and collection of Biometric Residence Permits following arrival
10. Registeration with local schools, English language and literacy classes
11. Attending local Job Centre Plus appointments for benefit assessments
12. Registration with a local GP
13. Advice around and referral to appropriate mental health services and specialist services for victims of torture
14. Assistance with access to employment
And of course, provided the migrants gang-rape, gang-sodomise and torture fewer than 1,400 girls in any one town, local politicians (usually Labour), social workers (Labour voters) and the politically-correct police will let them get on with it as it’s part of their culture.
Perhaps we’ll all soon have to move to Eastern European countries like Hungary and Croatia as they seem to be the only ones to realise the disastrous consequences of our politically-correct rulers’ desperately rushed attempts to *sl*mify as much of our continent as they can?
In England and Wales, our biggest animal charity is the £107m-a-year 2,217-employee RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals). But up in Nicola Sturgeon’s one-party state – the glorious Democratic People’s Republic of Scotland (twinned with North Korea) – they have their own big animal charity – the £14.4m -a-year 345-employee SSPCA (Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals).
Smart readers will have hopefully spotted that the RSPCA with a turnover of £107m a year and 2,217 employees is more than slightly larger than the wee SSPCA with just £14.4m a year and a mere 345 employees.
Given this, you might have thought that the boss of the SSPCA would be paid rather less than the boss of the much larger RSPCA. How wrong you would have been. The boss of the wee SSPCA received around £216,320 in the latest financial year, while the previous boss of the much larger RSPCA got somewhere between £140,000 and £150,000. In fact, despite the SSPCA being just 13% of the size of the RSPCA, the SSPCA’s boss’s salary was more than 40% higher than that of the RSPCA’s boss.
Moreover the wee SSPCA paid its boss more than any of the much larger animal and bird charities in Britain:
The six-figure sum dwarfes the pay of both Prime Minister David Cameron, who is on £142,000, and First Minister and Supreme Leader Nicola Sturgeon, who gets paid £135,000 a year.
It’s a fine old life being a charity boss – especially up in Bonnie Scotland!
Following my blog about maps yesterday, here’s a (slightly updated by me) map of what Europistan might look like in 2050 by which time the continent’s M*sl*m population will have increased by a factor of eight while the indigenous population will have fallen by 10% to 20% – meaning any country with 5% M*sl*ms now will be around 50% M*sl*m within 35 years:
In a previous blog I wrote about how Third World countries need to copy a few basic elements of Western civilisation to put themselves on the path of development: 1. Separation of Church and State: 2. Right to private property: 3.Rule of Law: 4. Freedom of Speech
But, instead of us helping Third World countries develop, in Europe we seem to be abandoning the foundations of our relative continent’s success compared to the rest of the world
1. Separation of Church and State This year we will allow in more than two million people who believe that their religion over-rides any idea of democracy
2. Right to private property In Germany and Sweden the authorities have already begun expropriating private property to house the millions arriving into Europe
3.Rule of Law In order to fool the public about what kind of people are coming to our countries the police no longer prosecute and the media no longer report rapes, robberies and murders carried out by migrants
4. Freedom of Speech Has been abandoned due to threats and acts of violence by those who are permanently offended and laws have been passed making any criticism of the Religion of Peace and its adherents a criminal offence (should anyone even dare)
And to end, here’s a heartwarming story from Germany posted by a reader yesterday. Welcome to Europistan!
According to a classified document, the German government now estimates that Germany will receive as many as 1.5 million asylum seekers in 2015, including 920,000 in the last quarter of 2015 alone. With family reunifications, the actual number of asylum seekers could swell to more than 7 million. Separately, German authorities now estimate that at least 290,000 migrants and refugees have entered the country without being registered.
Asylum seekers are driving a surge in violent crime in cities and towns across Germany. German authorities, however, are downplaying the lawlessness, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiment.
A confidential police report leaked to a German newspaper reveals that a record-breaking 38,000 asylum seekers were accused of committing crimes in the country in 2014. Analysts believe this figure — which works out to more than 100 a day — is only the tip of the iceberg, as many crimes are either not resolved or not reported.
The current spike in crime — including rapes, sexual and physical assaults, stabbings, home invasions, robberies, burglaries and drug trafficking — comes amid a record-breaking influx of refugees from Africa, Asia, the Middle East and the Western Balkans.
With more than 10,000 new migrants entering Germany every day, observers warn that crime in the country is sure to snowball. Experts say that many of the migrants will never be integrated into German society because they lack even the most basic skills to find work in the country. Some are warning of the establishment of parallel societies across Germany in which shiftless migrants are sustained by a volatile mix of taxpayer-funded social welfare handouts and crime.
Migrants are becoming increasingly unruly in their disrespect for German law. On September 11, for example, two asylum seekers from Libya attempted to shoplift items from a Netto-Markt grocery store in Freiberg, a town in the state of Saxony. After the men were caught with the merchandise by a security guard, they became violent and managed to escape.
A short while later, the men returned to the store with a machete and pepper spray, and began threatening the employees. When police arrived at the scene, the men attacked the officers, who fired warning shots into the air. One of the migrants was arrested; the other escaped.
Within hours, the detained man — a 27-year-old being housed at taxpayer expense in a refugee shelter in Freiberg — was released without charge. The next morning, the two men returned to the grocery store, pulled a knife and threatened to behead the employees
Just what has to happen before the BBC et al report the truth?
Here’s a nice map. It shows the *sl*mic world’s expansion about 1,400 years ago:
Here’s another one – hey it’s the British Empire:
“Rule Britannia, Britannia ruled the waves”
“Britain will probably end up being Germany’s slaves”
Here’s a map of the world today:
And here’s one showing the *sl*mic State’s plans for its own future:
So, if you’re thinking of buying a holiday home in Spain or even Greece, you might want to wait a bit. If this map comes about, property prices might fall a lot further. And, of course, you’ll have to get used to living next to a mosque.
Here’s one showing how *sl*m has spread throughout time:
(The red shows *sl*m’s most recent expansion – which covers much of Europe, the Caucuses and even parts of Australia. You’ll also notice how *sl*m seems to be spreading in waves engulfing ever more European, Asian and African countries)
Sunni and Shia are currently at each others’ throats and, helpfully for civilisation, busy slaughtering each other. But there is an old Persian saying: “Me, my brother and our cousin against the stranger. Then me and my brother against our cousin. Lastly, it will be me against my brother”.
So, although our M*sl*m friends are clearly crazy as evidenced by their current internecine wars, there is actually nothing stopping the crazies from making common cause against an “identified” enemy – the stranger (non-M*sl*ms, Kaffirs, Unbelievers).
I couldn’t find a map where the whole world has become an *sl*mic Caliphate. But I’m sure there is one somewhere.
I hope all readers have had the chance to view the interview with General Wesley Clark that I posted yesterday. If he is to be believed, the US and its glove puppet (the UK) would have overthrown the governments of the main Arab states whether 9/11 had happened or not. In fact, 9/11 and the subsequent invasion of Afghanistan were actually unwelcome distractions from the main policy of replacing the regimes of Iraq, Syria, Libya and other countries with US-friendly alternatives.
In the light of General Wesley Clark’s revelations, I’d like to repeat a blog I wrote a few months ago suggesting that we were lied to over Libya, in just the same way as we were lied to over Iraq and Saddam’s mysterious WMDs. Here it is:
We now know that Blair lied and lied and lied and lied to get us involved in the overthrow of the nasty dictator Saddam Hussein who supposedly had WMDs. And our propagandist media kept telling us that “nothing could be worse than Saddam”. We now know better.
Then came Syria. We were told that Bashar Al Assad was a thoroughly nasty dictator who had used chemical weapons and therefore we should help overthrow him. After all, our rulers and their tame media informed us “nothing could be worse than Assad”. We now know better.
After that came Libya. We were told that Qaddafi was a thoroughly nasty dictator and therefore we should help overthrow him. After all, our rulers and their tame media informed us “nothing could be worse than Qaddafi”. We now know better.
Is there anyone else who can see a pattern here?
There’s a recent article in the highly respected Foreign Affairs magazine suggesting that we were lied to over Libya in just the same was as we were lied to over Iraq and Syria.
Here’s a brief extract:
“Moreover, by the time NATO intervened, Libya’s violence was on the verge of ending. Qaddafi’s well-armed forces had routed the ragtag rebels, who were retreating home. By mid-March 2011, government forces were poised to recapture the last rebel stronghold of Benghazi, thereby ending the one-month conflict at a total cost of just over 1,000 lives. Just then, however, Libyan expatriates in Switzerland affiliated with the rebels issued warnings of an impending “bloodbath” in Benghazi, which Western media duly reported but which in retrospect appear to have been propaganda.
In reality, on March 17, Qaddafi pledged to protect the civilians of Benghazi, as he had those of other recaptured cities, adding that his forces had “left the way open” for the rebels to retreat to Egypt. Simply put, the militants were about to lose the war, and so their overseas agents raised the specter of genocide to attract a NATO intervention—which worked like a charm. There is no evidence or reason to believe that Qaddafi had planned or intended to perpetrate a killing campaign.
If the article is accurate, it makes chilling reading in the way it exposes the lies and incompetence of our leaders and their supinely obedient, propagandist press.
The dictators in Iraq, Syria and Libya may not have been the kind of people you would invite home to meet your mother. But they did keep their ungovernable countries under control. By removing them we have created utter chaos and appalling suffering. And as this chaos spreads to Europe, we will be the people to suffer from our rulers’ mistakes and lies.
I would like to recommend this short (2-3 minutes) YouTube video (sent to me by a reader). It features part of an interview with American General Wesley Clark where he explains that the Americans really believed that, if they threw out the oppressive regimes in Iraq, Libya, Syria and other Middle East states, they would suddenly become nice, democratic countries and be best buddies with America (apologies if you’ve already watched the video, but it’s so damning that it’s worth seeing again to fully appreciate the stupidity of our rulers):
In another interview, Clark explained the US Middle East strategy of toppling regimes that were not friendly to America:
Ooops. It seems the Americans were wrong. It seems that when you kill lots of M*sl*ms to supposedly ‘liberate them’, they don’t end up liking you. Who would have thunk it?
But worse, experience has taught some of us that M*sl*m countries, where pretty much every sect and tribe and religious group hate each other, need to be controlled by a strong leader otherwise they fall into chaos and the anarchy of internecine civil war. We should have learnt this in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya. I’ve learnt this, dear reader, and I’m sure you have too. But our stupid rulers have learnt nothing.
And that’s why we now we have the utter mess in Syria. Putin understands that we need to reinstate Bashar “Basher” Assad and get the place under control again (if that’s possible). But Obama and Cameron are still bleating about Syrian ‘democracy’. It would be funny if it wasn’t so tragic.
David Craig, on October 18th, 2015
