(My thanks to a reader for making me aware of the subject of today’s blog)
Anyone who worries about the *sl*mification of Britain is immediately branded a “waaaccciiisssttt” and a “bigot” and accused of *sl*mophobia. Plus we’re told that, as there are ‘only’ 2,706,000 M*sl*ms in Britain, they make up just 4.5% of our population and therefore any talk of an *sl*mic takeover is exaggerated nonsense.
However, our M*sl*m friends are not evenly spread out across the country. They tend to settle in certain areas where there is already a substantial M*sl*m population.
In the 2001 census, there were around 40 parliamentary constituencies where more than 10% of the population classed themselves as ‘M*sl*m’. In the table below, I’ve listed 23 of these 40 constituencies (as many as I could fit on the table) to show how their M*sl*m populations have grown between the 2001 census and the 2011 census:
The key column to look at is the one on the right – the speed of increase. Most have gone up by 30% to 40% or more in just 10 years.
So, should we be worrying about the *sl*mification of Britain? You’ll find the answer to that question in the right-hand column of the above table.
As our useless rulers – Cameron, Merkel, Hollande and O’Bummer – finally realise that deposing strong Middle East leaders and replacing them by the Islamic State isn’t such a great idea and that they need to talk to Putin, I’d like to re-use a post I wrote just over two years ago about how we should be working with Putin to defeat our common enemy – radical Islam. It’s a pity it has taken our rulers so long to understand what most of us have probably known all along!
Here’s a picture with six clowns and one great international statesman. Can you spot who are the clowns and who is the great international statesman?
Yup. That wasn’t very difficult. While Cameron, Merkel, Hollande, Obama and Kerry have behaved like idiots, buffoons, fools, clowns over their desperate attempts to get involved in yet another pointless, internecine Middle East war that has nothing to do with us, there has been one person who has behaved calmly and thoughtfully – Russia’s Vladimir Putin.
It has become fashionable in the press to criticise Putin over the lack of real democracy in Russia. But Russia is not Kensington or Notting Hill Gate where most of Britain’s chattering classes live. Russia is a huge, almost ungovernable country. Russia’s surface area is 17,098,246 km2 compared to the US at 9,629,091 km2 and Britain at a pathetic 242,900 km2. So, Russia is almost twice as large as the US and seventy times larger than the UK.
Moreover, Russia was facing complete chaos until Putin took over. Putin has been the best thing that every happened to Russia since Boney M sang “Ra-Ra-Rasputin, lover of the Russian queen”. Under Putin’s rule, the earnings from Russia’s oil, gas and minerals have not been squandered as they are in most other resource-rich countries. Instead they have been (more or less) invested in imposing order in this vast country, in modernising it and in building a new middle class of highly educated people. Visit any holiday resort around the world, and the people you’ll see buying holiday homes and yachts are mostly Russians. This is an incredible, almost unbelievable change from just a couple of decades ago and light years away from what happened when Russia was the Soviet Union.
Of course, there have been problems. You can’t move from totalitarianism to chaos to peaceful development and national economic success in just a few decades without a certain degree of central control. And you can’t have a country earning so much wealth without some of it being siphoned off by corrupt politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen.
We are making a terrible mistake in constantly attacking Putin over supposed human rights abuses and corruption in Russia. The West and Putin have one common enemy – radical Islam.
But instead of understanding this and working together with Russia to fight the spread of radical Islam, idiots Cameron, Merkel, Obama, Kerry and Hollande want to turn our military into ISIL’s air force. It’s time to stop demonising Putin and to realise that Russia and the West are on the same side.
How long will it take for the clowns that rule us to tell the difference between our friends and our enemies?
Today I’ll touch on a subject no journalist or media ‘expert’ would ever dare cover as they’d immediately be accused of “waaaccciiisssmmm” and be hounded out of their jobs. And how would they then pay their mortgages and send their brats to private school?
However, having just been in China, I did start to wonder how (with virtually no foreign aid) China had pulled 600 million people out of poverty in the last 40 years, while those idiots in Africa had (despite $20bn a year in foreign aid) managed to plunge about 600 million people into poverty over the same period.
So, I’m grateful to a reader for making me aware of an academic study published around 15 years ago (before the rise of political correctness) titled “Intelligence and the Wealth and Poverty of Nations”.
In 2000, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan took the politically-correct position that intelligence “is one commodity equally distributed among the world’s people”. However, the article’s authors studied IQ levels of 60 countries and their rate of development from 1945 to 1998 and found a strong correlation between national intelligence levels and economic success.
In summary, the authors propose that the average intelligence level of North-East Asians is about 105, for Western Europeans and the USA it’s about 100, for M*sl*m countries around 83 and for Sub-Saharan Africa it’s a frightening 70 – massively below most other parts of the world
You won’t find any news media keen to report this.
Of course, some people would rubbish the findings by claiming that the education systems in some countries make their people more likely to do well in IQ tests and therefore it would be wrong to suggest that intelligence is not evenly distributed.
However, there have been other explanations put forward for differences in IQ: perhaps climatic conditions meant that those peoples who moved further away from Africa towards colder climates had to use more ingenuity to survive in more hostile environments. Others have suggested cultural reasons, for example that the Protestant work ethic led to more rapid development and thus increases in IQ than the more corrupt, less entrepreneurial Catholic culture. And my personal belief is that the extraordinary complexity of some Asian languages – especially Chinese and Japanese – has meant that children’s brains develop faster than those of Europeans or Africans.
There were some anomalies in the study – countries like China, Russia and those in Eastern Europe. However, as soon as these countries broke free of communist and socialist political oppression, they all developed rapidly thus reinforcing the basic theory that national intelligence and economic development are strongly linked.
I also suspect that both high and low intelligence levels are self-reinforcing. So, the more intelligent a people are the faster they develop, the more educated they become and this in turn contributes to increasing intelligence levels. On the other hand, as most African countries have so excellently demonstrated – the lower the intelligence level, the more likely the people are to indulge in tribal wars, the less likely they are to educate and develop their people and the more likely it is that intelligence levels will decline.
You may or may not choose to accept the study’s findings. But it’s a pity that due to political correctness, nobody nowadays dares even mention that there may be differences in intelligence between countries and races and that these may account for some of the differences in economic success and why some countries will always be hell-hole, excrement-covered, poverty-stricken failed states.
(If you want to listen to it, you click on the above link and then on the ‘play podcast’ symbol in the top left of your screen)
Today, I thought it might be worthwhile summarising just a small part of what he says:
A. The West has shown the way – after over 2,000 years of oppression and warfare, the West has developed a political system that has provided better lives for the majority than any political system before it. Of course, Western democracy is not perfect. There is massive inequality; we have ‘crony capitalism’ where our politicians are all multi-millionaires from being glove puppets for bankers and large corporates; and our public sector is corrupt, self-serving and stupendously wasteful. But despite all this, most people in the West have a reasonable standard of living and can look forward to long and healthy lives
B. Copying should be easy – the first person who invented the wheel was a genius. But after that, the wheel was pretty easy to copy. Similarly, the West has developed a political and social system that (in general) works. So this should be easy for other countries to copy
C. The three foundations for success – there are probably just three things that have to be in place for other countries to emulate the success of the West:
– 1. Separation of Church and State – after hundreds of years of war between Protestants and Catholics, the West realised that there was a need to separate political power and the religious establishment. You cannot have any kind of freedom if the ruling party also considers it represents God’s will on Earth and therefore any opposition must by definition be heretical. Having church and state as one is especially dangerous if the religion is actually a rabid, moronic death cult at war with itself (Sunnis vs Shiites) and committed to world domination, Armageddon or both
– 2. Right to private property – no society can develop and create wealth if corrupt officials can arbitrarily confiscate or steal any successful business or property. For example, I know a family in Egypt that runs a cement business. They just keep it ticking over providing a modest income as they know that, were they to expand, their business would be stolen by corrupt government officials and the family might even be imprisoned on some trumped-up charge to justify the theft of their company. The same is true across much of Africa, the Middle East and Latin America
– 3. Rule of Law – the third element for economic and social development is that nobody is above the Law and that people can have a reasonable degree of confidence that their rights will be protected against arbitrary actions by corrupt politicians and government officials.
If you look across the world, you’ll see that those countries which are now developing and creating wealth – Malaysia, South Korea, Thailand – have, to some extent, copied these three elements. Even China, a one-party state, has managed to grow its economy and take 600 million people out of poverty in just 30 years by strengthening the right to owning a business, owning private property and the supremacy of the rule of law.
Similarly, if you look at those states which are failing and which are condemning their people to lives of misery and even violent death – almost all M*sl*m and African countries, much of Latin America and of course North Korea – you’ll see most, if not all, of these three basic elements lacking.
After 2,000 years of trial and error, the West has shown the way. If other countries are too stupid, religiously obsessed, backward or corrupt to follow, it’s their own fault and not our problem.
When I went away a couple of weeks ago, the M*sl*m hordes were pouring over Europe’s borders in their thousands every day. Now, two weeks later, the numbers flooding in seem to increase by the day. Meanwhile the holier-than-thou ‘opinion leaders’ preach to us about our humanitarian duty to house the millions heading our way and try to convince us that the new arrivals are all wonderful people who have endured a terrible journey to get to Europe.
So I thought it might be useful to produce a simple 8-step pictorial guide to what is really happening to expose the lies of our politically-correct, *sl*mophiliac rulers and their obedient sycophants in the media:
I wanted to blog about the inevitable consequences of the migrant swarm. But I didn’t want a visit from the Thought Police so funked it:
However, I do wonder if all those parading with “Migrants Welcome” signs and applauding the arriving migrants will be quite so cheerful when the bombings and beheadings start in Europe?
On the larger issue of our cultural suicide, there is an excellent article by Peter Hitchens in the Mail on Sunday about why we have no right to give away our country after so many hundreds of thousands died in WWI and WWII defending our freedom:
Probably more than 90% of babies being born are being born into poverty or abject poverty. I wonder how many will want to come to borderless Benefits Britain as “refugees”? Or should I ask, I wonder how many won’t eventually want to come to borderless Benefits Britain as “refugees?
Or if you need to escape reality, here’s Locomotive Breath by Jethro Tull. Just a tiny example of what music was like before its Simon-Cowellisation:
My thanks to a reader who alerted me about an upcoming important UN conference which will surely solve all the world’s problems. Here are the details:
1. We, the Heads of State and Government and High Representatives, meeting at the United Nations Headquarters in New York from 25-27 September 2015 as the Organization celebrates its seventieth anniversary, have decided today on new global Sustainable Development Goals.
Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
Sustainable Development Goals
Goal 1. End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Goal 2. End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 3. Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 4. Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Goal 5. Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Goal 7. Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Goal 8. Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all
Goal 9. Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Goal 10. Reduce inequality within and among countries
Goal 11. Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Goal 12. Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Goal 13. Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Goal 14. Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Goal 15. Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Goal 16. Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Goal 17. Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development.
What a joke! Sometimes real life outdoes anything that satire could produce.
Nowhere in all these wonderful goals is there any mention of the coming Third World War between Sunnis and Shiites and between *sl*m and civilisation. Nor is there any mention of controlling the population explosion in the world’s poorest countries.
Currently around 5.6 billion of the world’s 7.3 billion population (77%) are having to survive on less than $2 a day – the World Bank definition of “extreme poverty”. Still, no doubt the attendees, many from the world’s most corrupt, poverty-stricken, excrement-covered hell-holes will all have a great time wining, dining, shopping and shagging in New York at their respective, usually oppressed and impoverished people’s expense.
This shortish (6 minutes) YouTube video of an American former journalist and now public policy analyst using gumballs explains the utter stupidity of allowing a mass migration of millions from poor countries to Europe
The Hungarian Prime Minister seems to be the only European leader with guts and brains. He wrote:
“Those arriving have been raised in another religion, and represent a radically different culture. Most of them are not Christians, but M*sl*ms. This is an important question, because Europe and European identity is rooted in Christianity”.
At a separate news conference in which he faced reporters alone, he reiterated the theme of his article, that Europe was at risk of being “overrun” and had to shut its borders. The Hungarian Prime Minister argued that European countries had no obligation to accept most of the migrants, as “the overwhelming majority of people are not refugees because they are not coming from a war-stricken area”.
Mr. Orban went on to invoke Hungary’s historical experience as part of the Ottoman Empire, which ended more than three centuries ago, as an explanation for its current opposition to M*sl*m immigrants: “I have to say that when it comes to living together with M*sl*m communities, we are the only ones who have experience because we had the possibility to go through that experience for 150 years”.
“We don’t want to criticize France, Belgium, any other country,” he said, but “we think all countries have a right to decide whether they want to have a large number of M*sl*ms in their countries. If they want to live together with them, they can. We don’t want to and I think we have a right to decide that we do not want a large number of M*sl*m people in our country. We do not like the consequences of having a large number of M*sl*m communities that we see in other countries, and I do not see any reason for anyone else to force us to create ways of living togetherin Hungary that we do not want to see”.
Imagine Spineless Dave ever having the courage to put Britain first like Mr Orban stands up for his country!
3. Media exploitation of the boy’s death
What is the most predictable thing about the tragedy of those little boy’s death is how it has been cynically exploited for political gain by the Left in support of their mass immigration agenda. That’s the Left for you – let no child’s death go unused when it means you can import some more welfare-dependent perpetual Labour voters and rub people’s noses in your power.
Just think back to the Tunisian massacre of white westerners a little while back. No media-porn of dead bodies lying on the beach – ‘too distressing’ we were told. Yet when it suits the Left’s agenda we get pictures of that poor child’s lifeless body on the beach 24/7…..
Please also notice how the media almost always calls the migrants “refugees” rather than “migrants”. For example, a Pakistani migrant has just died in Budapest. Yet we’re told he’s a “refugee”.
We are being played, exploited and manipulated like the fools we are.
As Syrian mainly M*sl*m migrants pour into Christian Europe from perfectly safe M*sl*m Turkey, a cynic might wonder about a couple things:
1. Why are so many fit, young men of military age, who could be fighting for their country’s freedom, scarpering to safety in Europe? It’s lucky that in WWI and WWII British men stood up to the Germans and didn’t all also run away to safety in places like America, Canada and Australia
2. When things go wrong on migrants’ boats, the men always seem to fight their way to safety leaving the women and children to drown. With our M*sl*m friends it seems to be a case of “women and children last!”
On a more positive note, I thought I’d use today’s blog to warn readers of a new email scam.
Over the last few days, I’ve received emails supposedly from Next, Aldi, Boots and phone company EE. In return for completing a three-question survey or clicking on a link, I’ll apparently get vouchers worth anywhere from £250 to £500. I know this is a scam but I didn’t answer so I don’t know how it works.
Anyway, here are few of the emails I received. If you get something like this – delete!
1. Next
Thanks for your recent visit to Next. We are reaching out to our most valued customers to learn more about their recent experience. The information you share from this short survey will remain confidential.
Please help us to improve our services by answering our one-minute survey. As a sign of our appreciation for the completing the survey, we will give you aNext voucher worth 250 GBP.
We appreciate your feedback on this brief survey. We look forward to reviewing your responses and turning your input into more improved service and meaningful product development atNext.
Thank you,
Nancy
Product Development
2. EE
We are reaching out to our most valued customers to learn more about their experience with EE Telecom. The information collected from this short survey will help us provide you with a better service. As a sign of our appreciation for the completing the survey, we would love to give you avoucher worth 1.000 GBP.
The 3 question survey will take no more than 2 minutes, and all answers will remain confidential.
Take the survey here.
We appreciate your feedback and looking forward to create a better experience for you and for all of our customers.
Thank you,
Lucas
Promotions Manager
3. Aldi
Hi davidcraig
Thank you for agreeing to take part in our market research survey! We are conducting this survey in an effort to better understand our customers. Your participation does not obligate you to purchase anything.
Just answer the question below and you can get the Aldi Customer Reward Card worth up to 500 GBP as thank you for your time.
Thank you again in helping us better cater to you!
4. Boots
Finalists Revealed for 500 GBP Boots Voucher
Hello davidcraig,
We congratulate you! You’re invited to shop in Boots with this special gift card offer. Take advantage of this offer until September 30, 2015 and receive up to 500 GBP worth of Boots voucher.
This is strictly limited and available only to selected people. When you are ready to receive your Boots voucher, click here.
When telling us about immigration, the Government likes to use ‘net migration’ figures. ‘Net migration’ is, of course the number arriving in Britain minus the number leaving. Net long-term migration to the UK (immigration less emigration) was estimated to be 318,000 in the calendar year 2014, a statistically significant increase from 209,000 in 2013.
Ooops. Not quite the cut to “tens of thousands, no ifs no buts” that Cast-iron Promise Dave pledged!
The Government uses ‘net migration’ figures because it knows that most people have busy lives and short attention spans and so, when thinking about immigration, will just remember the 318,000.
For us ordinary people there are two problems with the Government’s use of ‘net migration’:
1. It hides the real number of people flooding over our apparently non-existent borders
2. It says nothing about the quality of people leaving compared to the quality of people arriving
So, let me try to deal with these two issues today:
1. The number of people flooding in
Despite the Government never mentioning how many people are descending on Britain, we fortunately have statistics for the number of National Insurance number issued (click twice on chart to see more clearly)
These show that 641,000 people immigrated to the UK in 2014, a statistically significant increase from 526,000 in 2013. But the rate of arrival is shooting up and is now running at an extraordinary over 800,000 people a year – 66,000 a month, more than 3,000 every working day – arriving in Britain.
This is not immigration! This is an invasion!
2. The quality of people leaving
An estimated 323,000 people emigrated from the UK in 2014. Overall emigration levels have been relatively stable since 2010.
Here are the reasons people are leaving (click twice to see more clearly)
Around 200,000 of the 323,000 people leaving are going abroad to work. This rather suggests that we are losing our brightest and our best. Meanwhile pictures of the 2015 migrant swarm give us some idea of the kind of people now trying to come here:
So, beware the ‘net migration’ con. Be aware that although 641,000 people came to Britain in 2014, immigration is now running at a rate of over 800,000 a year. Moreover it is far from certain that the quality of the people arriving in our country is anywhere near the quality of people leaving.
David Craig, on September 29th, 2015
