For a very modest fee, you can ask for details about any person you are interested in or whose identity you wish to steal.
“192.com” explains that each of their personal records gives you a complete profile of a person including full name, current address, phone number (if available), age guide, other household occupants, neighbours, property price, neighbouring property prices and even local shop front photos, maps and aerial photography.
“192.com” also claims that an ‘edited Electoral Roll listing’ will include more detail than a ‘free directory enquiry listing‘, and make it much easier to find the person you’re looking for and find all about the person you’re looking for. Moreover, if the person is one of the 4 million people listed in the ‘Director’s database’, 192.com will provide you with even more detailed information about that individual.
Below is a sample of a “192.com” personal record. (Apologies that the picture isn’t clear, but you can find a better version on the “192.com” website)
As you can see, anyone with an Internet connection can quickly find out an awful lot about you. No wonder there is so much identity theft.
I believe there are many more websites like “192.com” and I’m sure many others give even more information.
Every morning I wake up, have breakfast, take a shower and write my blog.
Yet this never appears in any newspaper stories or TV news.
Why not?
Because exactly the same thing happens every day. So, how can it be news?
Every day crazy, bearded, violent, pig-ignorant, low-IQ, intolerant, “I-love-my-snackbar” screaming loonies slaughter quite a lot of people – thankfully usually other crazy, backward, primitive loonies from the same religion. And it seems that every news report nowadays features the usual crazies slaughtering each other in the name of their preposterous supposed ‘religion’.
Why do we get these stories? The crazies slaughter each other every single day. So how can it be news?
In 2014 there were 3,002 attacks by members of the Religion of Peace and Hatred killing 33,463 people (92 a day) and injuring another 27,522 (75 a day).
In 2015 there were 2,862 attacks by members of the Religion of Tolerance and Slaughter killing 27,594 (76 a day) and injuring another 26,142 (72 a day).
In 2016 there were 2,477 attacks by members of the Religion of Love and Murder killing 21,240 people (58 a day) and injuring another 26,680 (73 a day).
So far in 2017, there have been 608 attacks (6 a day) killing 4,308 (41 a day) and injuring another 4,954 (47 a day)
Crazies murdering each other isn’t news. It happens each and every day.
What really would be news would be just one single day when the crazies didn’t commit mass murder in the name of their supposed ‘religion’.
It purports to show the average IQ of different countries and thus regions of the world:
Of course, if you dare mention research like this you’ll immediately be howled down by the progressive, we-know-best, immigration-enriches-us, holier-than-thou libtards. And if you have a job and dare to mention this research, you’ll soon find that you don’t and you’ll be branded a pariah.
So, handle these results with care!
What does the map tell us?
1. African countries seem to have the lowest average IQ levels at around 65 to 70
2. Then come our friends from the Middle East’s favourite religion plus Muslim Pakistan and Bangladesh, mostly around the 80 mark
3. Most of the inhabitants of dysfunctional, corruption-ridden, failing South American countries are also a few sandwiches short of a picnic
4. European countries, North America, Australia and Russia come in at 95 to 100
5. At the top are China and some other Asian countries – Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea at slightly over 100
The results are taken (I think) from a book or research report titled “IQ and Inequality” which established a clear correlation between a country’s average IQ level and its wealth.
I imagine you could also establish that there is an absolutely clear correlation between a country’s average IQ level and violence – the higher the national IQ, the less likely that its citizens would spend most of their time trying to slaughter each other.
I rather suspect that the map above would be anything but a surprise to most of my readers. Though I understand that the results are an anathema to the ruling elites and the politically-correct mainstream media.
Obviously it would be “waaaccccciiiiisssssttttt” for me to make any comment on the results.
So I’ll leave it to my readers – (average IQ of around 100, I hope) – to do their own interpretation.
What about your IQ?
There are plenty of online IQ tests. Or if you go to the link above, you can also do a 45-question IQ test to find out which country best represents your IQ level.
Warning: the questions get increasingly difficult and the last 10 to 15 questions are rather challenging.
(Easter weekend blog) Sometimes you have to laugh at how we are being taken for fools by the pleb-despising ruling elites.
You might remember how, about a year or so ago, the holier-than-thou, virtue-signalling, brain-dead, West-hating libtards mounted a campaign to pressure the Government into bringing supposed “child refugees” from the Calais Jungle camp into Britain.
Our Government, of course, quickly caved in. So a great media event was organised with the TV and press being invited to witness the first coach-load of “child refugees” arriving in Britain to show how liberal and welcoming and generous our Government was. But this turned into a bit of a PR fiasco when some cynics started to question whether the first “child refugees” really were children.
Since then, as I understand it, our useless Government has continued to ship in plenty more “child refugees”. But this has been done in secret, far away from the cameras and the press so nobody could expose that most of these “child refugees” aren’t children and aren’t refugees. They’re young men of military age sent to Britain by their families so that, once settled here, they could bring their whole families with 10 to 20 supposed brothers (all, no doubt, called ‘Mohammed’) to Benefits Britain where they could live off benefits and crime while filling in their spare time by raping white girls and stealing from shops in the sure knowledge that our politically-correct police have been instructed not to take any action against them.
Anyway, here’s a shortish video exposing how we’ve been tricked by the ruling elites. The first minute or so is a bit slow. But after that you’ll get the chance to laugh at how we’ve been fooled yet again by the migrant-loving, West-hating, liberal elites.
Perhaps the sign in the video should read “shave the children”and not “save the children”?
(Caveat – the presenter in this video makes some possibly insulting possibly true personal comments about two people in the video. I obviously cannot cannot condone these comments. But I do respect the presenter’s right to air his personal views about a serious situation)
For my Easter Friday blog, I thought I’d just juxtapose four simple pictures.
The first two show how we welcome the ‘New Europeans’:
The second two show how the ‘New Europeans’ appreciate our welcome:
I’ll leave it to readers to judge whether there might be a small problem between the attitudes of the ‘welcomers’ and the attitudes of the ‘welcomed‘.
After all, were I to make any comments, PC Plod would probably arrest me for some new made-up crime – especially if I were to predict that Sweden and Belgium will fall to the invaders without a fight but that there will be civil war in several other European countries within the next 50 years as what’s left of the indigenous white population fight to get their countries back.
One of my close relatives recently died a few weeks after suffering a serious stroke which left her partially paralysed and unable to speak or communicate in any way.
This made me aware of a pretty ghastly moral dilemma facing many families. If you Google “elderly dying of starvation” you’ll find that it is increasingly common for elderly people in the West – particularly those who have serious medical conditions like dementia or strokes – to refuse food and die of starvation.
Each case is different and it will often be unclear if the refusal of food is due to the person losing the ability to swallow, the natural process of the body slowly shutting down or whether the refusal to eat is due to the elderly person not wishing to live with their condition any longer and so deliberately refusing food in order to die.
This presents families and friends with a rather unpleasant moral dilemma – do they allow medics to force-feed granny (or granddad) either through nasal or gastric tubes or do they allow the person refusing food to leave this life on their own terms?
This is a situation many of us may not know about and yet which many of us may have to face at some time in our lives.
For obvious legal reasons I will not describe my own situation.
So instead, here are a few brief stories from others who have faced this dilemma:
“Have any of you had the experience of this? My mother, at the age of 93, decided she had had enough some time ago and then stopped eating……. very distressing for us all to watch this happen……ended up in hospital and took her three and a half months to die…… very painfully in the end as she was vomiting up blood as her stomach degraded”
“Mom is 92 and in the early stages of multi infarct dementia, blind in one eye, almost blind in the second, can barely hear with a hearing aid. Terrible balance and always a fall risk. Before she started getting confused, she repeatedly told me she was tired of living like this and was ready to die. She lives with me and I have her on a 3 small meals with Ensure 3x/day to maintain weight (99 lbs). She was recently in respite care for one week and lost 5 lbs because they didn’t “encourage” eating and let her refuse the Ensure. My sister is telling me I shouldn’t pressure Mom to eat, that if she wants to die I should just let her eat as little as she likes and “let go”. Can one do this? Should I see her doctor for advice? If the dr says it’s OK for Mom to choose not to eat much, should I think about hospice? What are the legal (as in Adult protective services) implications of letting her starve herself? Has anyone been in this situation? Help!”
“My dad was 87 years old, was considered blind and had dementia. I agree that you need to seek help and hospice was amazing when I decided that it was time to let my dad go. I did not force food but did swab his mouth with cool water. The day he died was hard but I felt he did so with dignity and grace and that I got to be a part of that process”.
“Having watched a loved one starve to death and all their organs gradually shut down, every breath painful and laboured I think it’s about time the truth about ‘palliative care’ was told. It means watch them die, often slowly and horribly. The argument against helping people die seems to be ‘it’s too difficult to monitor and people might be killed who want to live’…. in other words this will be difficult to do so let’s not bother. The reality is horrifying”.
Here’s a very short Swedish government propaganda (sorry, I meant “information”) video.
It aims to convince dopey, boring, progressive, migrant-hugging, libtard Swedes that they must integrate with the invading Religion of Peace and Hatred armies and create a new kind of country – the New Sweden – that the whole world will envy.
It gives an insight into how a civilisation willingly commits suicide.
Below is a link to an article on Breitbart featuring an interview with the head of Red Bull Racing.
It seems he has dared to say what my obscure, largely ignored website (snouts-in-the-trough) has being saying for years and what the cowed, Islamophiliac mainstream media has been afraid to say for years.
I think I’ll buy some Red Bull to celebrate this rare outbreak of common sense:
Perhaps if you repeat something enough times, you’ll come to believe it?
That certainly seems to be the attitude of our progressive, liberal, holier-than-thou, libtard rulers. And every time there is a new attack by the Religion of Peace, Tolerance, Hatred and Violence, we hear the same repeated excuses – “psychologically disturbed”, “lone wolf”, “NTDWI” – and the same incantation “Islam is a Religion of Peace”.
Though, if the attack HNTDWI (had nothing to do with Islam), why would our rulers feel the need to constantly reassure us that “Islam is a religion of peace”?
It’s all very very confusing.
And, of course, after each attack the police and our rulers assure us that “we’ll never know the reasons for the attack” even though the perpetrator screamed something like “I love my snackbar” during the attack and prior to the attack posted social media messages demanding the slaughter of Jews, homosexuals and infidels.
Armenian genocide = Egyptian genocide?
This weekend I met an old man whose family had fled from Turkish-controlled Armenia in the 1930s. He had written a book about the persecution of Jews in the Ottoman Empire. Like many people, I knew about the Turkish Muslim slaughter of about one and a half million Armenian Christians between 1915 and 1917. But I hadn’t realised other groups had also been targeted. So he explained to me that the Ottoman Empire Muslims had persecuted any group which didn’t belong to the approved version of the Religion of Peace.
That was then, this is now.
Two bombs in Egyptian Coptic Christian churches as our friends from the Religion of Peace apply their charming approach to ethnic cleansing to Egypt’s Christians. It seems little has changed in the last 100 (or last 1,000?) years.
But given that the world’s most popular religion is the Religion of Peace, clearly the continued ethnic cleansing throughout the Middle East and the terror attacks in Europe are the work of just a few madmen who have failed to understand the main principles of their own religion.
Good heavens! What a surprise! I’m totally gobsmacked! Not!!!
So, our friends from the Religion of Tolerance and Hate have decided to send a few dopey, progressive, migrant-hugging Swedes to Paradise using their latest weapon of choice – a hijacked lorry.
It’s difficult to resist the urge to scream “I told you so”. So, I won’t.
“You progressive, lefty, virtue-signalling, libtardy Swedish idiots, what did you expect when you imported hundreds of thousands of illiterate, West-hating, unemployable, violent, rape-obsessed, intolerant, rape-obsessed Middle-Eastern subhumans? Peace and harmony?”
I’ve written before about how a UN “Development Report” predicted that Sweden would turn into an impoverished, Third-World country (poorer than Mexico) by 2050.
Let’s look at how Sweden is turning itself into a violent, Third-World, bankrupt cess-pit.
Religion of Love invaders posing as refugees are expected to cost Sweden $18.2bn this year, nearly 10 times over budget. And that’s just the cost for 318,000 Syrians who arrived in the last two years. There already are two million mostly welfare-dependent Religion of Happiness migrants in Sweden out of a population of just under 10 million (but growing rapidly)!
The $18.2bn is 19% of Sweden’s central government’s annual budget, and 3.2% of their GDP—imagine if the US spent $608bn (or the UK spent £100bn) a year on refugees, same proportions. That’s just over $58,490 per refugee per year. For reference, the average annual income in Sweden is $41,000 a year.
Of this total of $18.2bn, $8.7bn are the hidden costs of increased migrant crime incidents (specifically increased instances of rape and sexual assault)—which the government refuses to publicize.
Furthermore, migrants are not contributing to Sweden’s economy—of those refugees that came in 2015, only 500 have jobs.
Calculating the Cost of Sweden’s Syrian Refugees
Since 2013, Sweden has been deluged by 318,000 total migrants — lots of people, given Sweden’s small population.
Sweden’s government deliberately hides the true costs of the migrant crisis to maintain order. This is also the case in Germany, where the number of Islamic immigrants is underestimated by half.
Here’s how the basic costs break down:
Sweden’s government spends roughly $17,000 per year, per adult migrant, on general asylum costs (housing, food etc.). Given that there are 181,000 adult migrants, this works out to $3.1bn —already 50% higher than Sweden’s budgeted “migration” costs.
Sweden also has a very generous system for underage migrants—their subsidies actually work out to $74,000 per year per migrant (they get a daily stipend for food etc.). Since there are an estimated 57,000 migrant children in Sweden, this works out to $4.2bn.
The cost of social services is enormous: migrants get access to Swedish state-funded education, healthcare etc. However, since Sweden’s government excludes migrant status from usage statistics, it’s impossible to know their exact burden.The exception is education—we know that migrant children are educated at a cost of $17,600 per year. This works out to $1bn a year.The real education costs are probably higher (but the data is inadequate), because migrant children need translators (sometimes 5 translators per classroom), schools have to pay for added security measures, and migrant children often exhibit learning disabilities (caused by trauma, poor developmental healthcare in their homeland etc.) which means nurses & care-workers are needed in greater numbers.
Healthcare costs are also significant, with migrants receiving full benefits under Swedish law. Given that Sweden spends an average of $6,808 on healthcare per person per year, this works out to $1.6bn for the remaining migrants. Again, the real costs are probably higher, because the migrants are by and large not as healthy as are native Swedes.
In total, the base cost of migrants to Sweden will be at least $9.9bn in 2017. And no, they’re not “contributing to the economy” as many on the left claim— only 500 of the 163,000 migrants that arrived in 2015 have jobs.
They live on state handouts. That’s not surprising, given the massive cultural and language barriers, and the fact that most of the migrants lack relevant job skills.
Moreover, many of them hate the very people who get up every morning and go to work to pay the taxes which pay the migrants’ handouts
Crime is expensive: not only is policing costly, but price of administering justice is astronomical — there’s a reason lawyers are rich. First, let’s be clear: the “Syrian refugees” have caused an enormous amount of crime in Sweden, particularly violent and sexual crimes.
Let’s break it down statistically:
Sweden’s police officers admit that migrants are causing most of Sweden’s crime.
Sweden’s National Police Commissioner, Dan Eliasson, has stated that he needs at least 4,100 new full-time officers to deal with the surging crime rates (at a cost of over $160m a year).
Swedish police have now labelled 55 areas as “no-go” zones — 206,000 people (the “new Swedes” as they’re called) live in these areas. They are migrant slums which have replaced domestic law for Sharia.
In fact, migration is to blame for almost all Sweden’s increasing crime rate.
Furthermore, the types of crimes committed by migrants are an order of magnitude more serious than they used to be.
As you can see in the following charts, which tracks the crime rate of immigrant/migrant men aged 15-44, the number of incidents of serious crimes (red bar) has tripled since 2000, this includes things like murder, rape, and aggravated or sexual assaults
What are the costs of this migrant crime?
According to a recent study by Ingvar Nilsson, the average cost of an incident of a less serious crime in Sweden, like a mugging, are $22,000. The cost of a serious crime (violent or sexual assaults) averages out to $67,000.
The costs included by the researchers include ambulance costs, emergency room operations, sick leave, the need for social assistance for injured people, police investigations, the court system etc.
If we calculate the increased cost of crimes associated with the migrants, it turns out that serious crimes cost an additional $6.bn, while less serious crimes cost an additional $2bn. Finally, extra policing costs will require a minimum of $200m for additional officers and equipment.
Goodbye Sweden. It was nice knowing you
Immigration is turning Sweden from one of Europe’s richest and most peaceful countries into a violent, crime-ridden, bankrupt Third-World hell-hole.
David Craig, on April 20th, 2017
