I am a progressive feminist. This man has hurt my feelings. This man has offended me. This man should be arrested, prosecuted and imprisoned for speaking the truth and offending people like me:
|
||||||
|
By  David Craig, on August 30th, 2017A couple of days ago, I listed the three steps towards totalitarian thought control in Britain 1. Invention of the “hate crime” The first step towards the imposition of Britain’s totalitarian-state repression of free speech was the invention of the totally spurious concept of the “hate crime”. A “hate crime” is defined as an offense motivated by hostility, or that shows hostility, toward the victim’s disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity. The key issue here is how our rulers have linked the words “hate” and “hostility”. Somehow they’re claiming that anything motivated by “hostility” is automatically a “hate crime” even though there is a massive difference between “hostility” and “hate”. If I dared criticise some person or group, it would be difficult to prove I “hated” them but easy to show I was “hostile” to them. Thus any criticism automatically becomes a “hate crime”. 2. Anyone can claim someone is offended We all know that there are many thousands of idiots who spend hours on-line every day looking for something they can claim offends them. Then they can express “outrage” on “social media” and maybe even start a “twitterstorm” or suchlike. But the wonderful (from our rulers’ point of view) thing about the supposed offence of “hate crime” is that a person doesn’t have to be personally offended by the “hate crime”. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) already defines hate crime as ‘any offence which is perceived by the victim, or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice’. So, if you consider yourself offended by anything I write, or even if you are not offended but you feel someone else somewhere might have been offended, then the police would have to investigate whether I had committed a “hate crime”. 3. Words are now judged as dangerous as physical attacks Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), the most senior public prosecutor in England and Wales, has decided in her wisdom that on-line “hate crime” against any person or group is the equivalent of a physical assault. Like her predecessor, Keir Starmer (now, surprise surprise a Labour MP), Saunders appears to be a progressive, Blairite lefty who finds (IMHO) free speech abhorrent and wants it crushed. So Saunders has extended the concept of “hate crime” without needing to get any approval from the Government or Parliament. According to Ms Saunders, police should investigate any “hate crime” and judges should sentence anyone found guilty as if they had committed a physical assault. Conclusion – it’s over These three legal moves put together now mean that Britain probably has more oppressive censorship laws than most totalitarian countries. How we have allowed this to happen in a country that throughout history has been a champion of democracy and free speech is incredible. Venezuela’s laughable tin-pot dictator Maduro must be looking on in envy at how Britain’s rulers managed to extinguish freedom of speech without any protests or violence. In this new environment, it’s clearly impossible to write a blog like mine without risking investigation and possible prosecution should anyone anywhere feel that my blog was possibly hostile to someone somewhere even if that supposedly “offended person” was completely unaware of anything I had ever written. I have already been warned once by my local Plod about writing supposed “hate crimes”. Yet Plod apparently doesn’t have any time or resources to investigate rapes, murders, burglaries, motor theft, acid attacks, knife crime, illegal immigration, slavery, local government corruption etc etc. Had my readers been a little more supportive of my blog, I would have risked continuing. But when 98.7% of my readers were so tight-fisted that they refused to buy a copy of my most recent book (I just asked you to buy it, not to read it), it would be stupid for me to take a personal risk for people who couldn’t give a damn. I might review the situation in six months (March 2018) after I’ve seen what happens to other bloggers. In the meantime, as they say in the cartoons, “that’s all folks”. In the meantime, I would recommend www.breitbart.com/london/ or www.thereligionofpeace.com or www.barenakedislam.com But a British government forcing even blogs like my totally insignificant efforts to close down should serve as a mark of shame for our country and a terrible betrayal of all those who made sacrifices to preserve our freedom and democracy. The libtards have won! We cowardly Brits should all hang our heads in shame for allowing this to happen! By David Craig, on August 26th, 20171. The joys of multi-cultural enrichmentAs you all know, here at snouts-in-the-trough our mission is to spread the message about how we should all be celebrating the joys of multi-cultural enrichment Of course, there will always be ‘isolated incidents’ which cynics will use to suggest enrichment isn’t always great. But we all know that enrichment is the future and we welcome it. Anyway, here are just a few of those ‘isolated incidents’ from the last couple of days that stupid, misguided, bigoted cynics might try to use to criticise the enrichment that we all so desperately want: London – man arrested outside Buckingham Palace after attacking police with a large knife Brussels – man shot dead while attacking soldiers with a large knife Rotterdam – man arrested after being found with a Spanish-registered van full of gas canisters near a rock concert Amsterdam – also in the Netherlands – a believed to be de-radicalized man spread propaganda for the jihad while working with young people in Amsterdam’s radicalization and polarization department. Bilal L was hired as a youth worker because he was deemed, a spokesperson confirmed, to “know everything about radicalization and could spot and keep young people off the jihad-road.” But instead, he was actually preaching the jihad doctrine to young people, and had been doing so for several years London – Egyptian man jailed after murdering a man in Hyde Park. Hani Khalaf, 22, battered 62-year-old carer Jairo Medina to death before trawling through his belongings and stealing his mobile phone. The Egyptian had entered Britain illegally claiming to be from Syria and been arrested and bailed by the police more than 6 times for crimes (mainly robberies) but hadn’t been deported Germany – a Kurdish refugee found his torturers from ISIL were in the same refugee camp as him. When he reported this to the German authorities they decided not to investigate and not to take any action London – police will be prioritising investigating crimes against the “vulnerable” (people for whom English is a second language) and deprioritising crimes against native white English speakers 2. Spain – death by incompetence or political correctness?I think we’ve all been impressed by the speed with which the usually useless Spanish police killed or arrested the multi-cultural enrichers after the attacks in Barcelona and Cambrils:
But less attention has been paid to the reaction of police constable Manuel and his mates following the house explosion which preceded the attacks. So, let’s just spend a couple of minutes on that. A house used by our friends from Morocco exploded. After the explosion, Spanish police found 120 gas canisters at the house. I imagine that in many smaller Spanish towns there’s no gas supply. Instead people use large gas canisters bought from the local garage or supermarket. When a gas canister is used up, they take back the empty one and buy a new full one. The empty one is then returned to the supplier, refilled and used again. If we assume that a typical large gas canister lasts a typical family a few weeks – say one month – then with 120 gas canisters, the Moroccans living at the house had enough gas for about ten years. That’s quite a lot of gas. Yet despite a CIA warning about an impending attack on Las Ramblas in Barcelona, police constable Manuel and his mates apparently suspected nothing (“I know nothing” as Manuel used to say in Fawlty Towers) when they found ten years of gas stored at just one house used by North Africans.
Of course, we’ll never know why the Spanish police suspected nothing. Was it just old-fashioned incompetence? Or was it because political correctness prevented them even suggesting that misguided multi-cultural enrichers might be about to do something unpleasant in the same way that political correctness caused the British police to look the other way when over 40,000 “white trash” girls were being gang-raped, gang-sodomised, gang-tortured and prostituted for 10 to 15 years? 3. Welcome to ParisAnd here, to cheer us all up on this bank holiday weekend is a typical enrichment street scene from City of Love Paris – enjoy:
By David Craig, on August 25th, 2017Could readers please take account of the fact that I’m writing in a country which was once a beacon of freedom and democracy. But now Britain has some of the most restrictive censorship laws in the formerly developed (now rapidly un-developing) world. So, welcome to the “new, improved” snouts-in-the-trough – the website that celebrates the joys of diversity. The website that puts put people’s feelings above the truth. The website that believes lies are the new truth and truth is a lie. The website that believes facts are irrelevant and only libtard prejudices count. The website that supports every biased report and lie put out by the BBC, C4 News and the Guardian Just a couple of small things today as I haven’t had time to dig up something more substantial. An inoffensive cartoon Here’s cartoon a reader sent me. I hope it doesn’t offend anyone anywhere in any way. After all, this cartoon represents the new reality where all facts are lies and all lies are facts:
Welcome to the New Germany If you visit a German town, what do you expect to see? Lots of people drinking beer and eating sausages? A bunch of fat men in lederhosen marching along to an oom-pah-pah oom-pah-pah band? Election posters for Angela “Mad Cow” Merkel defaced with whatever the German word is for “traitor”? Well, here’s a fabulous short video from the New Germany. Oh, I just love the heart-warming multi-cultural enrichment shown in this video and hope we’ll also see lots more similar wonderful scenes of inter-community harmony like this in Britanistan soon:
By David Craig, on August 24th, 2017But as I’ve had to stop blogging due to Britain’s new oppressive libtard censorship laws (see yesterday’s blog) I’ll have to stop. Is that OK, constable? Or are you still going to arrest me, harass me and try to destroy my life on the instructions of your promotion-hungry chief superintendent as he tries to kiss the ass of his politically-correct superiors? By David Craig, on August 23rd, 2017It seems this will be my last blog. With Britain’s draconian new censorship laws, it’s no longer possible to express an opinion without risking a police investigation, police harassment and possible prosecution. There have been three main stages in the extermination of free speech in Britain: 1. Invention of the “hate crime” The first step towards the imposition of Britain’s totalitarian-state repression of free speech was the invention of the totally spurious concept of the “hate crime”. A “hate crime” is defined as an offense motivated by hostility, or that shows hostility, toward the victim’s disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity. So, if I were to dare to suggest that there is one religion that seems to be a teensy weensy bit more disposed towards intolerance and violence than most other religions. Hey presto! I could be accused of committing a “hate crime”. Or if I were to write that “Prince Charles was a lying, self-obsessed, self-absorbed, low-IQ, adulterous drip”, no doubt that would be considered as being “hostile” towards the useless Charles and again I could be investigated, harassed and possibly prosecuted. 2. Anyone can claim someone is offended We all know that there are many thousands of idiots who spend hours on-line every day looking for something they can claim offends them. Then they can express “outrage” on “social media” and maybe even start a “twitterstorm” or suchlike. But the wonderful (from our rulers’ point of view) thing about the supposed offence of “hate crime” is that a person doesn’t have to be personally offended by the “hate crime”. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) already defines hate crime as ‘any offence which is perceived by the victim, or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice’. So, if you consider yourself offended by anything I write, or even if you are not offended but you feel someone else somewhere might have been offended, then the police would have to investigate whether I had committed a “hate crime”. Given that my blog is often critical of the greed and incompetence of our rulers, the corruption and waste of the EU, the takeover of our continent by a resurgent Germany, the takeover of our country by our friends from the most wonderful of all religions and of our rulers’ policy of race replacement, then it becomes rather easy for someone somewhere to claim that they believe that I might have offended someone and am thus guilty of a “hate crime”. As I wrote yesterday, this definition of a “hate crime” created a ludicrous situation last year when the Home Secretary Amber Rudd’s speech to the Tory party conference was investigated as a ‘hate crime’ after an Oxford academic — who wasn’t even there — complained about what he felt was its anti-immigrant message three months later. (West Midlands police found no evidence of a hate crime but recorded it as a ‘non-crime hate incident’.) 3. Words are now judged as dangerous as physical attacks Yesterday I wrote about how Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), the most senior public prosecutor in England and Wales, has decided in her wisdom that on-line “hate crime” against any person or group is the equivalent of a physical assault. She extended the concept of “hate crime” without needing to get any approval from the Government or Parliament. According to Ms Saunders, police should investigate any “hate crime” and judges should sentence anyone found guilty as if they had committed a physical assault. Alison Saunders has just issued guidance to police, prosecutors and judges demanding a clampdown on any “hate crimes” on the media. The new policy documents cover different strands of hate crime: racist and religious; disability; and homophobic, biphobic and transphobic. Conclusion – it’s over These three legal moves put together now mean that Britain probably has more oppressive censorship laws than most totalitarian countries. How we have allowed this to happen in a country that throughout history has been a champion of democracy and free speech is incredible. Venezuela’s laughable tin-pot dictator Maduro must be looking on in envy at how Britain’s rulers managed to extinguish freedom of speech without any protests or violence. In this new environment, it’s clearly impossible to write a blog like mine without risking investigation and possible prosecution should anyone anywhere feel that my blog was possibly hostile to someone somewhere even if that supposedly “offended person” was completely unaware of anything I had ever written. I have already been warned once by my local Plod about writing supposed “hate crimes”. Yet Plod apparently doesn’t have any time or resources to investigate rapes, murders, burglaries, motor theft, acid attacks, knife crime etc etc. Had my readers been a little more supportive of my blog, I would have risked continuing. But when 98.7% of my readers were so tight-fisted that they refused to buy a copy of my most recent book ( I just asked you to buy it, not to read it), it would be stupid for me to take a personal risk for people who couldn’t give a damn. So, as they say in the cartoons, “that’s all folks”. But a British government forcing even blogs like my totally insignificant efforts to close down should serve as a mark of shame for our country and a terrible betrayal of all those who made sacrifices to preserve our freedom and democracy. The libtards have won! We cowardly Brits should all hang our heads in shame for allowing this to happen! By David Craig, on August 22nd, 2017Killing free speechYesterday was a catastrophe for Britain. Alison Saunders, Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), the most senior public prosecutor in England and Wales, has decided in her wisdom that on-line “hate speech” against any person or group is the equivalent of a physical assault. According to Ms Saunders, police should investigate any “hate speech” as a “hate crime” and judges should sentence anyone found guilty as if they had committed a physical assault. But what is a “hate crime”? Well, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) already defines hate crime as ‘any offence which is perceived by the victim, or any other person, to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice’. So, if you consider yourself offended by anything I write, or even if you are not offended but you feel someone else might have been offended, then I am automatically guilty of a “hate crime”. Apparently this definition of a “hate crime” created a ludicrous situation last year when the Home Secretary Amber Rudd’s speech to the Tory party conference was investigated as a ‘hate crime’ after an Oxford academic — who wasn’t even there — complained about what he felt was its anti-immigrant message three months later. (West Midlands police found no evidence of a hate crime but recorded it as a ‘non-crime hate incident’.) Alison Saunders has issued guidance to police, prosecutors and judges. To give you an idea of subjects that will now be taboo, the new policy documents cover different strands of hate crime: racist and religious; disability; and homophobic, biphobic and transphobic. They also say that victims of biphobic hate crime, aimed at bisexual people, have different needs and experiences compared to those suffering anti-gay and transphobic offences. So, if I make a comment or joke about say men who like putting their penises into the bottoms of other men and someone complains because either they are offended or they think someone else might be offended, this will be considered by the police, prosecutors and judges to be the same as if I had taken a baseball bat and attacked a couple of homosexual men in the street. Surely Alison Saunders must be the only person in Britain who cannot see how utterly absurd this policy is? But I suspect she doesn’t care as the real reason for this policy is to kill free speech once and for all so nobody dares criticise our rulers’ policy of race replacement and nobody dares criticise anyone from a certain religious group who seem to have a slight predilection towards violence. Killing Kevin CrehanA couple of weeks ago, I wrote a blog about Kevin Crehan. He was sentenced to one year in prison for putting some bacon on a mosque door handle and shouting some abuse. In December 2016 while in prison Mr Crehan mysteriously died. We were told at the time that he had probably committed suicide, though many people believed he had been murdered by some of our friends from our favourite religion. An autopsy was carried out in January 2017 and then Crehan’s body was hastily cremated thus destroying all evidence about how he died. In spite of over six months passing since the autopsy, no results have been released. One could suspect that had some white prisoners been suspected of murdering someone from the Religion of Happiness, then there would have been outrage in the media, widespread protests and the autopsy results would have been published within a few days of the death. Anyway, one of my readers wrote to the prison service asking when we would get any information about how Crehan died. Here’s the bureaucratic crap from the letter he received. Apparently when a white prisoner is possibly murdered by inmates from a certain religious group, it takes at least a year for the prison service to find out what happened: 22 August 2017 Our ref: Reference: FOI 179 Dear Mr B*********, Subject: Freedom of Information Requests Thank you for your email of 29 July 2017. Your request has been handled under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and information that is held by PPO has been provided. You requested the following information. ‘Kevin Crehan died in custody on 27/12/2016 and was cremated on 20/01/2017. Why eight months later has no cause of death been released to the press?’ As we have received several requests about the death of Mr Crehan we are providing a response that answers all queries within those requests. I can confirm the PPO is currently investigating the death of Mr. Crehan. We were notified of his death on 27 December 2016 and began an investigation into the circumstances. This was then suspended on 5 January 2017 because of a related police investigation, and because we did not know the cause of Mr Crehan’s death. Both of these issues are outside our control and do sometimes affect our fatal incident investigations, meaning they are suspended for several months. In June, we were told that the police investigation had concluded and that we were given the results of post-mortem examinations, which helped us consider how to handle the case. In light of these developments, we unsuspended our investigation on 12 June and set a new target date for our initial report of 5 December 2017. This new date takes into account the period we were unable to work on the case when it was suspended. There are no delays to the investigation for reasons other than the above and we will meet the new target date we have set unless there are other issues outside of our control. As we are still investigating Mr Crehan’s death we are not in a position to share our conclusions, but please be advised that we publish all fatal incident investigations on our website when our report is finalised and the inquest has taken place, including our conclusion and recommendations. We have been asked if we know the cause of Mr Crehan’s death. It is not the PPO’s role to determine this. Our role is to investigate the circumstances surrounding the death and identify lessons the prison can learn. The cause of death is determined by a coroner and jury following an inquest. We have not yet been told had the date of Mr Crehan’s inquest. You have the right to appeal our response if you think it is incorrect. Details can be found in the ‘How to Appeal’ section attached at the end of this letter. Yours sincerely Daniel Crockford By David Craig, on August 21st, 2017I want to live in a country with a mosque on every corner. I want to hear the joyous call to prayer blare out across our cities and towns five times a day. I want all women to undergo genital mutilation and then to be locked in their homes producing five to ten wonderful, West-hating mini-Jihadis each. And when the women are occasionally allowed out, I want them completely covered up looking like Darth Vader on a bad-hair day. I want most people to marry their first cousins, lowering the IQ level of the population and producing increasing numbers of medically-certified congenital morons. That’s why I want Britain to stay in the EU! I want to live in a country completely concreted over to build ever more Third-World slums for the illiterate, parasitic, unemployable millions pouring over our non-existent borders. I want our children to stop learning science and maths and biology and physics and chemistry and computer science and all the things that help human progress. Instead I want them forced to learn only from a book written over a thousand years ago containing what some foolish people might consider were the m*d ramblings of some ********** *********** ***** ******* (censored by PC Plod). That’s why I want Britain to stay in the EU! I want our once great Britain to cease to be an independent country with a proud history of bringing democracy and civilisation to the world. Instead I want us to become a small administrative, cash-cow region of a massive European superstate ruled by utterly corrupt, self-serving, hereditary bureaucrats taking their orders from what some people might consider a resurgent Nazi Germany which has finally fulfilled Hitler’s dream of subjugating the whole of Europe:
That’s why I want Britain to stay in the EU! I want our military and police to use their power against indigenous white British people imposing brutal political correctness, stamping out any free speech and stifling any criticism of those turning our country into a Third-World hell-hole. I want anyone daring to criticise the destruction of our country to be persecuted, to lose their jobs and to be imprisoned for supposed “hate crimes”. I want the white British population to cower in their homes while marauding gangs of unemployed and unemployable young men from ******* ******** ******* (censored by PC Plod) riot and rob and pillage what little is left of our country and, of course, beat up and gang-rape and gang-sodomise and torture any white girls foolish enough to venture out of their homes. That’s why I want Britain to stay in the EU! I am a spineless, treacherous coward. I want to betray the millions who died in two world wars protecting our freedoms and democracy. I call them fools. Brave patriots? No, they were just stupid suckers who sacrificed their lives for nothing. I laugh at their ridiculous ideas of honour and courage. I spit on their graves. I don’t want freedom. I don’t want democracy. I don’t want free speech. I am a snivelling, worthless disgrace to all those scientists, explorers, writers, political leaders and military commanders who once made Britain great. I am a worthless nothing and I deserve to see my country over-run by the fabulous, highly-educated, highly-literate, civilised cultural enrichers from the Third World. That’s why I want Britain to stay in the EU!By David Craig, on August 19th, 2017(weekend blog) Finland As you probably know, a few people have been stabbed by a man in the Finnish city of Turku and two have died. The attacker was screaming something like “I love my snackbar” during the attack. However, the Finnish police claim that the attacker’s motive is “unknown” and for the moment they’re denying it was a terror attack. No doubt as usual we’ll be told in a few days that the man was “known to the police” and had “psychological problems”. A tale of two boys I’m sure you remember the story of Aylan Kurdi. He was a three year old boy whose drowned body was photographed on a beach in Greece and used by the virtue-signallers and politically-correct mainstream media to put pressure on governments to admit millions of violent, illiterate, often inbred, low-IQ, unemployable, parasitic, benefits-scrounging, West-hating refujihadis and rapemigrants. Here are two photos of Aylan Kurdi which were ruthlessly exploited by the ‘rapefugees-welcome’ brigade:
At first we were told that Aylan Kurdi and his family were Syrian refugees. But later we found out that his family had actually been living for about two years in peaceful Turkey. So, when they set off for Europe, they weren’t fleeing war and persecution. They were understandably just heading for a better life in a richer country. And that’s OK. But the lefties and libtards desperately tried to cover up the fact that the boy died because his father was an economic migrant, not a refugee. Moreover, whereas with British shipwrecks it’s often a case of “women and children first”. With our friends from the world’s greatest religion it’s a case of “every man for himself and sod the women and children”. Now let’s move on to the recent Barcelona attack. Here’s a photo of what I believe is a young boy mowed down by the ‘van of peace’:
But you won’t see this photo in any mainstream media. You won’t see this photo broadcast around the world. You won’t see the lefties and politically-correct demanding justice for this boy. Why not? Because he was killed by a bunch of refujihadis and it would be Eezlumophobic to publish this photo. Moreover, this photo might make people understand the threat Merkel’s policy of race replacement by importing millions of refujihadis poses to Western civilisation and that’s something our rulers, the lefties and the libtards want to avoid at all costs. So the photo of the Barcelona boy will never be shown by the biased mainstream media. The photo of the Barcelona boy will be ignored by the mainstream media. Australia Meanwhile, here’s a short video from Australia. I don’t know the story. But it appears that the white Australian must have upset one of his “new Australian” neighbours so they “visited” him to discuss the matter. As I once half-heartedly enquired whether I could move to Australia and was told that I didn’t qualify, I find it mildly amusing to see the kind of people the Australian Government welcomed while telling me to get lost. Enjoy: By David Craig, on August 18th, 2017I hope my few remaining readers appreciate that there are at least two difficulties in writing a daily blog:
Meanwhile in BarcelonaCaramba! Ay-ay-ay-ay! Who would have thunk it? Yet another terror attack using a van of peace driven by someone from the religion of peace. And on the same day there was another van of peace or car of peace attack in a seaside resort near Barcelona:
No doubt we’ll be told that the motives for the attacks are “unknown”. Oh, and a house nearby being used by some Moroccans blew up as they were preparing explosives. And as the crocodile tears and platitudes pour in from supposed ‘world leaders’, the mainstream media have already started lambasting democratically-elected US President Donald Trump for daring to suggest that the attacks were connected to our favourite religion. Here are just some of the empty platitudes we’ve come to expect from our useless rulers: Britain – Prime Minister Theresa May said she was “sickened by the senseless loss of life in Barcelona” following Thursday’s deadly attack. Mrs May condemned the “terrible” assault in the Spanish city which saw a van plough into pedestrians and follows similar attacks in London in recent months. “The UK stands with Spain against terror.” Germany- In a statement, the office of German Chancellor Angela Merkel said they were thinking of the victims of the “revolting attack” with “profound sadness”. European Union – European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker said: “I send my deepest condolences to the families and loved ones of the victims, as well as to Prime Minister Rajoy and the people of Spain. My thoughts are with the people of Barcelona.” France – President Emmanuel Macron voiced “France’s solidarity” with Spanish citizens following what he called “a tragic attack”. Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo said: “Parisians are at your side. Barcelona and Paris are cities that share love and tolerance. Our values are much stronger than this heinous and cowardly act of terrorism”. Netherlands – It was a “cowardly attack against innocent people,” Prime Minister Mark Rutte said in a statement on his Facebook page, calling it a “black day at a place where many people around the world gathered.” The Vatican – Pathetic Pope Francis’s spokesman said in a statement: “The Pope prays for the victims of this attack and wishes to express his closeness to all the Spanish people, especially the wounded and families of the victims.” Have you ever heard such empty, meaningless, hypocritical sh*te as these pathetic cowards come up with every time we are slaughtered by those our rulers encourage to come into our countries to kill us? Arabs’ contribution to mankindIn the light of the latest Moozerlum atrocities, here’a an old (short) video I stumbled across in which an intelligent Arab (yes, some do exist) comments on the many achievements of our Arab friends. Who are we to disagree with someone who seems to know what he is talking about? |
|
|||||
| Copyright © 2026 Snouts in the Trough - All Rights Reserved | ||||||
