Wonderful times. US President Donald Trump tells the unvarnished truth and upsets the whole progressive, BBC-supporting, liberal British establishment. I just love seeing the howling outrage of the useless British ruling elites as Trump dares to expose their failures.
So, let’s just spend today’s blog enjoying Trump’s well-targeted attacks on our piece of garbage PM and her worthless, EU-loving diplomats.
Here’s Trump’s totally accurate criticism of the hopeless, treacherous May’s Brexit failure:
I don’t know anything about Sir Kim Darroch except that he was ambassador to the EU for years and that, if the worst PM in British history says she has ‘full confidence’ in him, then Darroch is probably as much of a pompous fool as Trump suggests:
And finally – Trump looks forward to the useless May being replaced and Britain getting a new PM. I love the way Trump says he was most impressed by the Queen during to his visit to London, thus suggesting he was more than unimpressed by the disastrous hag May and her bunch of sycophantic hangers-on:
While our rulers and mainstream media huff and puff in confected outrage over Trump’s comments, I think many ordinary people will be nodding their heads and thinking: “hit the nail on the head Donald – tell it like it is!”
Moreover, I believe many ordinary people will be wishing we had a strong leader like Trump in the UK – a leader who believed in his country and worked for those who elected him (unlike Theresa May and most of the ruling British Establishment who seem to be working full-time for the globalists in Brussels and Davos).
I got up late today and so don’t have a story. Or perhaps there is one thing I could mention?
There is a bit of good news I can bring you. The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has finally moved with the times and recognised that there are more sexes/genders than just male and female. Of course, there used to be just two sexes/genders in Australia – ‘mates’ and ‘sheilas’. But, in the next census, the questionnaire will be giving a multiple choice of answer on the question of what sex/gender each respondent is.
Of course, the question is difficult as we all know that there is now a huge difference between ‘sex’ and ‘gender’. One’s sex is whether one was born male or female. Or at least it used to be that simple. Gender is apparently something completely different. Gender is apparently a ‘social construct’ and nowadays anyone can identify with whatever gender they choose:
We don’t yet know how the ABS will approach this issue. Will they ask for each respondent’s ‘sex’ or their ‘gender’? Moreover, if the ABS asks for each respondent’s ‘sex’, how many options will they give? Will it just be ‘male’ (mate), ‘female’ (sheila) and ‘other’? Or will there be many more options? Or if the ABS asks for people to state their gender, will they give all the 71 options I wrote about a few days ago? Or will the ABS cut down the choices to a more manageable mere 40 or 50?
It is now politically-correct to claim that gender is a spectrum with multiple possibilities:
In fact, to suggest otherwise is a ‘thought crime’ a ‘hate crime’ and clearly ‘heteronormative’ and ‘transphobic’. I believe that the Scottish schoolboy who claimed there were only two sexes/genders has now been expelled. But there are some dinosaurs who think the whole multiple genders thing is a load of total bollox:
It’s all pretty fascinating stuff.
Here’s a United Nations report praising how the Australians are approaching the thorny topic of sex and gender in their next census:
If we ever needed a perfect indication of a civilisation that has lost its way and is doomed to decline and be conquered by a more self-assured and more aggressive civilisation (I think you can guess which one) this pointless and narcissistic squabbling over sex and gender must surely be it.
We all know that Jeremy Hunt voted for the UK to Remain in the EU. However, now he wants to become PM, he seems to have slightly changed his mind and so claims he wants to lead Britain out of the EU.
Guido Fawkes reports that some of the most generous donors to Jeremy Hunt’s campaign to become the next Tory leader have also contributed to Remoaner groups.
Of the nine major donors to Hunt’s campaign in May, seven have also donated to pro-Remain groups and parties in recent years, accounting for almost £75,000 of Hunt’s £104,000 raised. Almost three quarters of Hunt’s total funding in May…
£2,406.25 to Labour Remainer MP Virendra Sharma in March 2018
Overall that’s over £225,000 Hunt’s backers have donated to anti-Brexit campaigns, parties and politicians, before sticking their financial clout behind him.
Tory members listening to Hunt promising to take the UK out of the EU might well be wondering what he’s telling his hardline Remain donors that he isn’t telling them…
‘German’ rapists
Here’s a brief story from Germany and Spain. Four ‘German’ men have just been arrested for raping an 18-year-old girl on the holiday island of Mallorca. We even know the four alleged rapists’ ‘christian’ names. No, they’re not Kurt, Wolfgang, Fritz and Franz. The ‘christian’ names of the alleged rapists are Serhat, Azad, Yakub and Baran. Oh, and they all have dark hair and beards. So they’re probably not pure Aryans.
It’s interesting to see how the authorities cover up the extent of migrant crime by our friends from the religion of fantasticness by referring to members of the religion of fantasticality as ‘Germans’.
(By the way, do our friends from our favourite religion have ‘christian names’ or will the expression ‘christian names’ be expunged from our language so as not to cause offence to those whose life is dedicated to being offended?)
I have some wonderful news for you this weekend. Our national broadcaster al-BBC Arabic Service and the Arab Barometer have just conducted a survey which has shown that more than half of the young people in the Arab world are looking to leave the area and migrate elsewhere.
The project interviewed 25,407 people face-to-face in 10 countries and the Palestinian territories. The Arab Barometer is a research network based at Princeton University. They have been conducting surveys like this since 2006. The 45-minute, largely tablet-based interviews were conducted by researchers with participants in private spaces.
The survey revealed that an average of 52 per cent of those aged 18 to 29 said that they were looking to migrate abroad.
(I do wonder why the percentage wanting to leave such hell-holes as Sudan, Yemen and Lebanon has fallen)
The most sought after destination for migration, according to the BBC, is Europe, followed by North America.
Experts have previously predicted huge waves of migrants coming to Europe, mainly from Africa, with French-American journalist and professor Stephen Smith claiming that within 30 years Europe could have a population of 150 to 200 million Africans.
Let us rejoice!
Clearly we should all welcome this latest survey. After all, with an ageing and declining population, Europe needs lots of ambitious, hard-working, well-educated, technically-advanced, law-abiding, peace-loving new citizens. As the useless Brussels Drunk, European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker, declared in 2017 Europe had a “clear need” for mass migration from Africa, stating that Europe “will clearly need immigration in the coming decades”.
And now that most European countries have signed the UN Compact for Safe and Orderly Migration, leaving the cesspit sh*t-holes these people come from and moving to Europe pretty much becomes a human right.
Let us ignore the cynics
Of course, there will always be horrible, Izlumophobic cynics who fear that the importation of millions of possibly inbred, possible uneducated, often criminal, often religiously-fanatical, often unemployable, often deeply criminal, sometimes sex-obsessed and violent young men won’t entirely positive for Europe:
Some Europeans may fear that many of these young Arab men don’t share Western democratic values:
Others may worry that their culture is different from ours:
There could be people who worry that the new arrivals may not respect our laws:
And there could be those who feel that the new arrivals may not agree with our religious tolerance:
But I’m delighted that so many millions (or tens of millions or hundreds of millions) have decided to come and enrich our societies.
Gay Pride and the new arrivals
There was just one thing that the survey found which might concern some people. This weekend about a million Brits will take part in so-called – Gay Pride marches. The al-BBC survey found that the young Arabs considered honour killings more acceptable than homosexuality.
Our friends from the gay community had better be careful with what they wish for:
The best-selling “auto-aufkleber” (car sticker) in Germany is one that says “Fuck You Greta”. Apparently many German drivers don’t respect the views of that great climate scientist Greta Thunberg. Here’s Greta lecturing to an admiring audience in London:
In the audience is Ed Miliband the person responsible for the Climate Change Act – the stupidest and most economically-destructive piece of legislation ever passed by the House of Conmen (and Conwomen)
Oh look, Michael Gove is there too. If he hangs on as Environment Secretary, no doubt he’ll dream up something even stupider than Miliband Junior’s idiocy and what little is left of British industry will move to China. Then we can borrow ever more money to buy crap from China that used to be made in Britain. And when we can’t borrow any more, we’ll just sell our ports, airports, power stations, agricultural land etc etc to Chinese companies (as so many other Third-World countries have done) so that we can keep on buying Made in China crap.
I have previously featured a lovely photo of the wonderful Greta with our very own (IMHO) increasingly crazed naturalist Sir David Attenborough:
Or Lord Attenborough of Glastonbury as he might one day be known:
Glastonbury seems to have a habit of inviting (IMHO) increasingly senile old fools to grovel to the teeming masses of admiring, libtard-indoctrinated, braindead snowflakes:
Oh, and here are a couple of members of the Adams Family:
BBC pay scandal: year after year repeat, repeat, repeat
Every year the BBC brings us a repeat – the pay scandal. Every year the BBC keeps increasing the pay of its so-called “talent” (and its managers). And every year the BBC bleats that it’s forced to pay so much otherwise all this talent would decamp to commercial TV stations. I don’t know who would want all the over-paid, over-pensioned BBC managers.
Here to cheer us up before the weekend is LBC’s Nick Ferrari wondering why we have to give the BBC so much money for repeat after repeat after repeat:
Following on from yesterday’s blog about the ludicrous woke, libtard idea that there are more than two genders, I’d like to introduce you to Karen Blair. Sorry, I meant Assistant Professor Karen Blair.
Karen Blair is reportedly an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the respected academic institution St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, Nova Scotia; an Adjunct Professor of Psychology at another world-renowned centre of learning – Acadia University in Wolfville, Nova Scotia – and Chair of the Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity Issues (SOGII) Section of the Canadian Psychological Association.
Given that Assistant Professor Karen Blair is Chair of the Sexual Orientation & Gender Identity Issues (SOGII) Section of the Canadian Psychological Association, you can probably imagine the (IMHO) kind of utter, politically-correct tosh she teaches to her wildly misguided snowflake students.
A study co-authored by this great, world-famous, highly-respected academic apparently found that around 87.5% of respondents would only look for a partner in the cisgender (not trans) community. This seems to have upset Assistant Professor Blair.
This 87.5% of us refusing to consider dating trans people, Assistant Professor Blair suggests, contributes to trans people suffering mental and physical harm:
‘What then, does this mean for trans people’s overall well-being if the majority of people within society won’t even consider them as potential dating partners under hypothetical conditions? A lack of social support could contribute to some of the existing discrepancies in mental and physical well-being within trans communities.’
If a man doesn’t want to have sex with a chick-with-a-dick or a female doesn’t want to have sex with a chick-who-wants-a-dick, Blair theorises that this is because of prejudice and ignorance:
‘…exclusion was likely the result of factors ranging from explicit transprejudice, such as viewing trans persons as unfit, mentally ill, or subhuman, to a lack of understanding or knowledge about what it means to be a transgender man or woman.’
Blair concludes that we will only achieve full equality for transgender people when we all start having sex with them:
In other words, it is one thing to make space for trans people within our workplaces, schools, washrooms, and public spaces, but it is another to see them included within our families and most intimate of spaces, our romantic relationships. We won’t be able to say, as a society, that we are accepting of trans citizens until they are also included within our prospective dating pools
So there you are folks – until all you men start banging chicks-with-dicks and all you women have sex with chicks-wanting-dicks, then we will never achieve full inclusivity.
Off you go now. Do your duty for inclusivity!
I wonder how long it will be before every job interview questions applicants on whether they have had sex with a trannie? Then maybe failure to have boom-boomed with a trannie will show that you’re a politically-incorrect transphobic and prevent you from ever getting a job?
(Meanwhile, in sweltering, heatwave Germany, they’ve had to close quite a few swimming pools due to the usual groups of foreign gentlemen sexually harrassing female swimmers and defecating in the water. But that’s a story for another day)
I sometimes worry that too many of my readers are a bit old-fashioned and believe in such silly, outdated things as patriotism, community cohesion, controlled immigration, taking personal responsibility for one’s actions etc etc. So I feel that one goal of my modest little blog should be to open readers’ minds, to make them more ‘woke’, to help them adjust to all the wonderful ways society is changing for the better thanks to things like continual victimhood, globalism, uncontrolled immigration and the willful destruction of national cultures and identities by the internationalist ruling elites.
That leads me on to today’s Big Question for my readers – How many genders are there?
Yippee! More Twitter outrage
Former Olympic swimmer Sharron Davies has just got into a bunch of trouble for tweeting:
Davies has previously opined:
These tweets have predictably resulted in a flood of abuse and accusations of “transphobia” and “hate speech” from the usual idiots who spend their lives trying to find something to be offended by. Here’s Owen Jones, who can always be relied on to wade into any argument with the most outraged ‘woke’ views:
Most other reactions from the ‘woke’ community are too obscene or extreme to be featured here.
How many genders are there?
This brings us back to today’s Big Question – How many genders are there?
UK Facebook users can now choose from one of 71 gender options, including asexual, polygender and two-spirit person:
Users can choose a different gender option from the previous male and female choices by selecting ‘custom’ in the gender tab of their profiles. I believe that originally there were only 50 gender options. But these were increased to 71 following howls of outrage by the people who self-identify with the other 21 gender options that Facebook didn’t include.
In addition, people who select a custom gender will now have the ability to choose the pronoun they’d like to be referred to publicly.
There’s even a book now which can explain to old-fashioned ‘binary’ fuddy-duddies the wonders of all the new genders which (as far as I know) didn’t exist just a few years ago:
See, with snouts-in-the-trough.com you learn something new every day!!!!!
You might remember a glorious incident in August 1999. During a visit to an electronics factory in Scotland, Prince Philip saw a messy fuse box and said it looked “as though it was put in by an Indian”. Within hours, Buckingham Palace started grovelling to the politically-correct: “The Duke of Edinburgh regrets any offence which may have been caused by remarks he is reported as making earlier today. With hindsight, he accepts what were intended as light-hearted comments were inappropriate.”
Anyway, what’s that got to do with anything? Here’s the world’s most dangerous plane – the Boeing 737 Max:
The plane has been grounded after a few hundred people were killed in two crashes – Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines – within a few months of each other. The crashes have been blamed on software issues which pushed the planes’ noses down when the pilots were trying to climb after take-off. And while trying to fix these problems, Boeing has found further software problems which will further delay the plane ever getting certification to fly again.
Why blame the Indians?
Well it turns out that this wonderful flying machine has been partly built in India, not America as most passengers (alive or dead) might have thought. Let me explain:
From what I understand, Boeing have been trying for years to break into the Indian aerospace market which is dominated by Airbus. The American plane-maker and its subcontractors have been moving ever more work to India and have relied on temporary workers making as little as $9 an hour to develop and test software, often from countries lacking a deep background in aerospace — notably India.
In offices across from Seattle’s Boeing Field, recent college graduates employed by the Indian software developer HCL Technologies Ltd. occupied several rows of desks, said Mark Rabin, a former Boeing software engineer who worked in a flight-test group that supported the Max.
The coders from HCL were typically designing to specifications set by Boeing. Still, “it was controversial because it was far less efficient than Boeing engineers just writing the code,” Rabin said. Frequently, he recalled, “it took many rounds going back and forth because the code was not done correctly.”
Boeing’s cultivation of Indian companies appeared to pay dividends. In recent years, it has won several orders for Indian military and commercial aircraft, such as a $22 billion one in January 2017 to supply SpiceJet Ltd. That order included 100 737-Max 8 jets and represented Boeing’s largest order ever from an Indian airline, a coup in a country dominated by Airbus.
Apparently HCL engineers helped develop and test the Max’s flight-display software, while employees from another Indian company, Cyient Ltd., handled software for flight-test equipment.
Anyone who has ever dealt with an Indian call centre – like those used by the useless HSBC – might, at this point be tempted to scream: “Aaaaarrrrrgggghhh!!!” After all, it’s one thing for an Indian call centre to completely cock up your bank and credit card transactions and leave you stranded with no access to your money. But designing safety-critical software for passenger planes is perhaps slightly more serious.
Boeing, of course, said the company did not rely on engineers from HCL and Cyient for the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, which has been linked to the Lion Air crash last October and the Ethiopian Airlines disaster in March. The Chicago-based plane-maker also said it didn’t rely on either firm for another software issue disclosed after the crashes: a cockpit warning light that wasn’t working for most buyers. And Boeing issued the usual corporate guff press release: “Boeing has many decades of experience working with supplier/partners around the world. Our primary focus is on always ensuring that our products and services are safe, of the highest quality and comply with all applicable regulations.”
Moreover, in a statement Indian firm HCL said it “has a strong and long-standing business relationship with The Boeing Company, and we take pride in the work we do for all our customers. However, HCL does not comment on specific work we do for our customers. HCL is not associated with any ongoing issues with 737 Max.”
But some people, who know a little about Boeing and safety-critical software development, seem to have a different opinion:
I heard of Boeing laying off developers software engineers here on the east coast making $135,000 to outsource to India tech companies paying $20k or less. Language barriers persist and takes months instead of weeks for completion.
Many, many, many years of experience have shown that in almost all cases, outsourcing software development to a foreign country doesn’t work. It looks great on paper, but language differences such as differing interpretations of some words, cultural differences such as who can red flag an issue, ethical issues such as accepting sub-standard decisions rather than complain and possibly hurt their career … and the list goes on and on and on. While this may be acceptable for PC software development, it just doesn’t fly (pun intended) on planes where lives are at stake
Writing safety critical software is not only very skilled but it requires specific training and process knowledge. Outsourcing to someone who just says “Yeah, we can do it cheap” is negligence or worse
Anyway, I doubt you’ll see this story on the BBC or C4 News because to suggest that our friends from India do shoddy, third-rate work would be waaacccciiiiissssttttt!!!!
Using simple arithmetic, I worked out how many more Africans are born every minute. Assuming that the population of Africa increases by around 50 million a year, this works out at around 100 more Africans every minute, 6,000 more Africans every hour, 144,000 more Africans every day and, of course, about one million more Africans every week:
I wonder how Africa is going to find food, water, homes, jobs, schools, hospitals etc etc for all these teeming millions?
Or do our rulers think that the only solution to this unsustainable population explosion is to bring millions of Africans to Europe?
Empire of Dust?
Of course, were Africans capable of developing their own countries, they might be able to accommodate their rapidly increasing population. But, sadly, there are few signs of this.
I came across a Belgian documentary film made in 2011 called Empire of Dust. It follows a Chinese Chinese road engineer Lao Yang and his African translator Eddy. They both work for a company called CREC (Chinese Railway Engineering Company). The engineers have just set up camp near the remote mining town of Kolwezi in the Katanga province of the RDC. The goal of the company is to redo the road – covering 300km – that connects Kolwezi with the capital of the province Lubumbashi. Lao Yang is head of logistics of the group.
The film exposes the complete inability of the Africans to do any constructive work. In the brief trailer below, the Chinese engineer expresses incredulity at the stupidity and backwardness of all the Africans he has to deal with and he asks Eddy how it was possible to have been colonised by White Europeans and to have learnt absolutely nothing from them. Moreover, the Chinese engineer cannot understand how the Africans have allowed all the infrastructure – roads, railways etc – built by the colonisers to rot away. And he criticises Africans for going backwards since the colonisers left.
I, of course, being a brain-dead, virtue-signalling, hug-a-rapefugee, woke libtard believe that it’s all Whitey’s fault that all African countries are poverty-stricken, utter sh*t-holes. However, the many people I have spoken to, who have actually worked in Africa, say the situation is hopeless – that Africans are incapable of getting organised, incapable of building anything worthwhile, incapable of maintaining even the simplest equipment, incapable of progressing.
Anyway, here’s Leo Yang asking Eddy why Africans are so totally useless:
I’m obviously not a ‘climate scientist’. So I don’t get huge grants for claiming that humans are responsible for Global Warming or Climate Change or Climate Crisis or Climate Breakdown or Climate Extinction or whatever it’s called this week.
What I have understood is that when it’s unusually cold – like when we had the ‘Beast from the East’ last winter – this is used by the eco-loons as incontrovertible evidence that we’re experiencing Climate Change that results in more extreme weather events. But when we have a hot period, like at the moment, this is used by the eco-loons as incontrovertible proof that we’re experiencing Global Warming. And, of course, the BBC reliably informs us that human activity is responsible for this warming (totally ignoring the fact that we’ve had at least three other major warming periods since the last ice age about 10,000 years ago):
Anyway, here to put the current warming in to context is Tony Heller.
Apparently the European heatwave of 1947 was much worse than anything we’re experiencing now. Though you wouldn’t know that if you got your news from the mainstream media.
I apologise that his videos are a bit monotonous. But I guess that the truth can seem a bit boring when compared to the breathless hyperventilating panic of attention-seeking supposed ‘journalists’ desperate to advance their careers:
David Craig, on July 10th, 2019
