Starmer – statesman or slimeball?

weekend blog

Party political broadcasts by the party in power before local elections tend to feature lots of ‘ordinary people’ (or out-of-work actors who would do and say anything for a few quid pretending to be ordinary people) gushing about all the wonderful improvements the Government has made to schools, hospitals, roads etc etc etc.

I haven’t seen the Labour Party’s effort for this year’s May local elections. But I believe it features Starmer standing at a lectern with a couple of Union Jacks behind him blethering about his extraordinary achievements as a great international statesman standing up for Britain in a turbulent world.

This approach is unusual for local elections which should focus on local issues. Perhaps Labour couldn’t find any ‘ordinary people’ (or even out-of-work actors) prepared to say anything positive about the Starmer regime’s domestic achievements?

This is surprising in view of the many wonderful changes the Starmer regime has forced on us – two-tier policing, decriminalising shoplifting, over 70,000 illegal migrants crossing the Channel, scrapping jury trials, imprisoning critics of open-borders immigration, introducing digital ID and facial recognition cameras to better control us, suffocating free speech, massive increases in taxes on people who work in order to give more generous benefits to anybody who can’t be bothered to go to work, crushing businesses and households with Mad Red Ed Miliband’s highest energy prices in the world and giving away the Chagos Islands and £35 billion of our money to a vassal of the Chinese Communist Party. With so much to celebrate, it’s surprising that the Labour Party local election didn’t focus on these ‘successes’.

While the useless tool Starmer tries to play at being a great international statesman and bringer of peace on his trip around the Middle East and the British mainstream media tries to big up Starmer’s and Britain’s international importance, not everybody is as impressed with Starmer as the BBC and C4 News and Sky and others of their ilk seem to be. So I thought it worth mentioning something that the British mainstream media are unlikely to report – the former Shah’s son, Reza Pahlavi, seems to be less than impressed by Starmer’s peacemaking efforts. Here’s a statement from the former Shah’s son:

“The United Kingdom has endlessly appeased the criminal regime in Iran. The Prime Minister speaks of protecting the innocent civilians of Iran but failed to act to help stop the regime’s massacre of 40,000 innocent Iranians in January. Only an end to this regime – that brings terror to Britain’s own shores – will yield lasting peace and regional stability.”

“Keir Starmer should follow in the footsteps of Churchill, not Chamberlain. He should support the Iranian people’s fight for liberty. The Iranian people will remember who stood with them in their hour of need and who stood against them. There is still time for the Government to change course: prosecute the IRGC that slaughters innocents, expel the illegitimate regime’s ambassador, and act to support the people of Iran.”

I doubt you’ll see this rather critical message from the former Shah’s son mentioned in the grovellingly sycophantic British mainstream media.

Starmer the traitor?

The satirical AI videos get better and better: