June 2021
« May    

Inbreeding and *sl*m

(Monday/Tuesday blog) I did this story before (January 2015). But, in case you haven’t seen it, here it is again.

One explanation for *sl*mic fundamentalism and the ensuing daily terrorism that’s never proffered is stupidity and insanity.

A never-spoken-about problem with M*sl*ms is their inbreeding as a result of their long and deeply-ingrained practice of marrying first cousins — a practice that has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses.

In 2005, Labour MP Anne Cryer called for first-cousin marriages to be banned. Then in 2008, the UK’s environment minister Phil Woolas again sounded the alarm about this “very sensitive” issue that is “rarely debated”. Referring to the culture of arranged marriages between cousins in the M*sl*m immigrant community, Woolas said: “If you have a child with your cousin the likelihood is there’ll be a genetic problem.

Woolas, whose views are supported by medical experts, said most cases occur in immigrant families from rural Pakistan, where up to half of all marriages involve first cousins. Woolas said: “If you talk to any primary care worker they will tell you that levels of disability among the . . . Pakistani population are higher than the general population. And everybody knows it’s caused by first cousin marriage.

first cousin marriages 2

The problem is made worse by generational inbreeding. As Woolas put it, “Many of the parents themselves and many of the public spokespeople are themselves products of first cousin marriages.” That would explain why research for BBC2’s Newsnight in November 2005 showed that British Pakistanis accounted for 3.4% of all births but 30% of all British children with recessive genetic disorders.

But the problem isn’t exclusive to Pakistani M*sl*ms as Woolas seems to imply, but is pandemic among M*sl*ms across the world.

According to Nicolai Sennels. a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into M*sl*m inbreeding, close to half of all M*sl*ms in the world are inbred:

  • 70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
  • 67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
  • 64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
  • 63% of Sudanese are inbred.
  • 60% of Iraqis are inbred.
  • 54% of M*sl*ms in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
  • 25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
  • In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
  • In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

Sennels points out that cousin marriage was sanctioned by M*h*mmad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the M*sl*m world. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the M*sl*m world since M*h*mmad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage. To M*sl*ms, any scientific research conducted in the last 1,400 years is irrelevant if it contradicts the teachings of their ridiculous book.

Sennels warns that massive inbreeding in M*sl*m culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the M*sl*m gene pool, including extensive damage to M*sl*ms’ intelligence, sanity, and health. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

Below are the consequences of inbreeding:

  1. Birth and birth defects:
  • 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.
  • 50% increase in the risk that the child dies during labor.
  • The risk of autosomal recessive genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher.
  • The risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
  1. Physical and mental retardation and illnesses:
  • The closer the blood relative, the higherthe risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
  • The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness, i.e., insanity.
  • Social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academyfound that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”
  • Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by 400% among children of cousin marriages.

All of which would explain the following phenomena among M*sl*ms:

  • 1 out of every 3 Somalis are mentally ill.
  • More than 40% of the patients in Denmark‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant (i.e., M*sl*m) background.
  • One-third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a “foreign” (i.e., M*sl*m) background.
  • In Denmark, psychologist Sennels’ native country, “non-Western” immigrants (who are mainly M*sl*m) are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
  • In Denmark, M*sl*m children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education.
  • 64% of school children with Arabic parents in Denmark are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
  • The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of M*sl*ms in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.

M*sl*ms’ average lower IQ means a lowered ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking, which would explain why:

  • The Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone did before the economic crash of 2007/8. In the last 1,200 years of *sl*m, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain used to do in a single year.
  • 7 out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
  • Only 9 M*sl*ms had ever won the Nobel Prize, and 5 of those 9 were for the “Peace Prize.”
  • According to Naturemagazine, M*sl*m countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).

Sennels concludes: “The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of M*sl*m inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “*sl*mophobe” and a “racist.”

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the M*sl*m community is accused of whipping up hatred against M*sl*m people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects….

Let us keep in mind that M*sl*ms are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of *sl*m….

In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-M*sl*m.”

Incidentally, our MPs are always keen to get to get their opinions on TV and in the press. But curiously, when Anna Cryer (2005) and Phil Woolas (2008) mentioned the problem of first-cousin marriages amongst M*sl*ms, all our other MPs suddenly seemed to become invisible.

As for the useless NHS, which is always issuing instructions to us proles on how to live (less alcohol, more exercise, less junk foods etc). when asked about the problem of M*sl*m first-cousin marriages, the NHS refused to comment saying only that this was “a matter for local communities”.

(Hopefully you’ll visit tomorrow – Wednesday – as I may have quite an interesting blog for you)

5 comments to Inbreeding and *sl*m

  • mickeycz

    Thank you for this insightful piece. Inbreeding (the most extreme form of endogamy), over time, basically makes the lowest common denominator the norm for populations that carry it out.
    Many places have outlawed the practice. I live in a state where the statute outlaws sexual intercourse between first cousins, not just marriage.
    Islam is a global experiment that just keeps on failing in its relations to the human race, but without being banned altogether, will continue its dark practices to our detriment.

  • JDixon

    Good article…
    Though I wish you, like so many of you, would quit putting the blame on this vague “Left”…

    Listen, where I’m coming from, virtually All Scientists are on “the Left”–as opposed to “the Right” which, while they despise the Muslims, are doing so because they are Anti-Science and Islam is their #1 competitor since they’re virtually all evangelical Xtians…

    Not all “Lefties” are blind to these things. In fact only a small portion are of the “politically correct” nutjob case–that that is strictly out of Ignorance since here in the U.S. Muslims are a minorities and “Americanized” Muslims are radically different from the Middle East maniacs who think the world is flat and the sun sets in a murky pool or water every night… IF they were woken up to Real Islam–not the watered-down American variety–they would awaken to become leading fighters Against Islamic insanity, namely Sharia Law (which most Do Not have a clue about!)…

  • casper

    one generation of outbreeding erases the detriment of many generations of inbreeding. muslims are intent on solving their inbreeding problem–by breeding the women of the west, killing the men, and enslaving the children. this is a good solution for muslim criminals, but a very bad solution for western dhimmis. inbreeding is Islam’s problem, and the west would be well advised to keep them inbred, rather than offer their own women to solve the “problem”. it is sworn and deadly enemies–muslims–that we are talking about. that they be stupid and inbred is much better for us. they are causing enough problems as they are. we certainly do not need to submit our own population to genocide to improve them.

  • Ed Sain

    * * * in words makes no sense to me. We know the w*rds. If you w*nt to n*t swear, then omit the words. You are not hiding words by putting an astericks. It has no purpose.

    A more effective way is to use adjectives, such as regressive progressives and semi-communist athiest liberals; not l*berals and pr*gressives.

  • Bill Sandelin

    Are they to dam scared to spell Muslim or Muslim’s.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>