May 2017
« Apr    

Are Britain’s “poor” really poor?

(Weekend blog – I’m afraid this one may be ‘politically incorrect) Since 2010, the amount of British taxpayers’ money ladled out in welfare to the supposed “deserving poor” has risen from £111bn a year in 2010 to £113bn in 2016. It is expected to remain at around £113bn this year.

This is extraordinary. Why? Because the British economy has grown (albeit slowly) every year since 2010. Moreover, there are so many jobs available in Britain that around four million EU citizens have moved here to work – around half from Eastern Europe and the other half from the Club Med countries ruined by Adolf Merkel’s (sorry, Freudian slip, of course I meant “Angela Merkel”) ‘Germany First’ (Deutschland über alles) policies which have led to 50% youth unemployment in countries like Greece, Spain and Italy.

The British Government has tried to halt the relentless rise in welfare payments. There were howls of outrage from the usual lefty libtards in Labour, the Guardian, the BBC and Channel 4 when the Government introduced a ‘household benefits cap’ supposedly limiting the amount any single household could claim in benefits to £26,000 tax-free a year. Endless ‘suffering families’ were paraded in the press and on TV telling us how they and their (usually many) children would be unable to afford food, heating, clothing and schoolbooks on a ‘mere’ £26,000 tax-free a year.

Then there was even more outraged howling from the same idiots when the household benefits cap was further reduced in 2016 to £23,000 in London and £20,000 outside London.

I don’t know about you, but I’d be more than happy if someone from the DWP turned up at my home and told me I could have £20,000 a year tax-free for the rest of my life thanks to the enforced generosity those who can be bothered to get up in the morning and go out and do some work.

Anyway, a couple of days ago I had some indirect contact with the poor oppressed families who are apparently struggling to survive on just £20,000 tax-free a year in welfare.

I wanted to give four dining-room chairs and a sideboard to charity. Here’s one of the chairs and the sideboard:


The chairs are I believe what’s called ‘Brown Furniture’ which pretty much every home had in the 1950s and 1960s.

OK, I admit the chairs aren’t too beautiful. But they’re in excellent condition and will last at least another ten years or more.

First I rang a couple of charity furniture shops. But Health and Safety rules meant they were not allowed to sell the chairs as the chairs had some fabric on them but didn’t have labels stating that the fabric was ‘flame resistant’ or ‘flame retardant’ or something like that. I suspect the chairs were made before the relevant Health and Safety rules were implemented. Anyway, the charity shops couldn’t sell the items.

But the charity shops told me about a local charity organisation that accepted furniture donations which they then gave out free to families in need. As the chairs weren’t being ‘sold’, this organisation could accept them. So I emailed a copy of the above photo to that organisation telling them I had four matching dining-room chairs, plus the sideboard if they wanted it.

A couple of hours later I got a reply. ‘No’ the local charity organisation couldn’t use the four chairs (or the sideboard) as they “aren’t in a style that is popular with our clients”. Apparently their ‘clients’ (who get everything free) prefer furniture “that is more modern”.

We’re constantly being lectured by the lefties about how the poor are suffering under the brutal rule of a Tory Government which only serves the rich and how the number of people dependent for their very survival on food banks keeps increasing:

But what struck me as strange was that these supposedly ‘poverty-stricken’ families saved from certain starvation by food banks are so particular about the style of furniture in their homes – furniture they could get for free – that they turned their noses up in disgust at Brown Furniture items like my chairs and sideboard.

That made me wonder how ‘starving’ Britain’s supposedly ‘deserving’ poor actually are.

And as for the Government’s supposed benefits cap per household – when our friends from the Religion of Benefits-R-Us (in which each man can have four wives and therefore four households) that gives each male up to £80,000 a year tax-free in benefits without ever having to work.

Yippeee! Maybe that’s why the welfare bill keeps rising even as more jobs are created and maybe that’s why around 200,000 of these good people pour into our country each and every year!

(If you click on the title, you’ll see from the comments that other people have also found that Britain’s “poor” are very fussy about what they’ll accept for free in their taxpayer-funded homes)

It’s competition time! Hooray! It’s “spot the women and children”

As we approach the weekend, I thought I’d test my readers with a short, brain-teasing competition.

You may have heard that last week alone over 1,000 ‘refugees’ (yes I know they’re not ‘refugees’) were supposedly ‘rescued’ (‘rescued?’ stop laughing you at the back) by EU Frontex boats and brave volunteers working for charities like Médecins Sans Frontières and Refugees Rescue.

Of course, anyone who is not a progressive, holier-than-thou, West-loathing libtard will know that these ‘refugees’ are mostly parasitic, violent, unemployable migrants headed for a life of benefits and crime in Europe. You will also know that they are not being ‘rescued’. Instead, they are being sent to sea by well-paid people-smugglers in flimsy, overcrowded boats that have just enough fuel to reach outside Libyan territorial waters where they are picked up by a flotilla of EU and charity boats and ferried in safety and comfort to Europe.

Anyway, here is a picture of just a few of these more than one thousand ‘rescued refugees’:

And here’s another picture from last week’s ‘rescues’:

In today’s competition, readers have to spot how many women and children there are among these ‘rescued refugees’.

So, what’s the answer? What? None? Duh. Wrong! Try again!

WTF! You’re still saying ‘none’! Of course there are no women. They’re all being held captive and constantly being raped and tortured and then killed by the Religion of Tolerance people-smugglers in Libya.

As for children, can’t you spot them? Still ‘no’? That shows how little you understand about the progressive, liberal, libtard narrative.

OK, here’s the answer . “They’re ALL children!”

Yes, I know they’re all big, strong, well-fed men in their late twenties and early thirties. But when they get to Europe they’ll all claim to be 17-year-old children and their claims will be immediately accepted by EU officials instructed by our rulers to flood our continent with Third-World debris to destroy any concept of countries in order to force the whole of Europe into one huge multi-cultural paradise.

But let’s move on. Here’s the graph that should terrify us all. It shows the UN’s projections on population growth for Europe and our dear friends and neighbours in Africa:

This is probably the most important graph that you’ll ever see. Yet it’s one that our rulers refuse to mention because the implications are too unimaginable for their supine subjects.

In the 1950s there were about 250 million Africans and most were impoverished and starving because the people’s laziness and stupidity meant their countries didn’t produce enough food to feed them. So, plagued by guilt about their colonial past, Western countries started pouring billions in aid to these poor starving Africans.

By 1995, there were around 500 million Africans and most were impoverished and starving because the people’s laziness and stupidity meant their countries didn’t produce enough food to feed them. So, plagued by guilt about their colonial past, Western countries continued to pour billions in aid to these poor starving Africans.

Now there are over one billion Africans and most are impoverished and starving because the people’s laziness and stupidity mean their countries don’t produce enough food to feed them. So, plagued by guilt about their colonial past, Western countries have increased the amount of money they’re handing over in aid to these poor starving Africans.

But now Western countries are doing something else. They’ve started providing a free ferry service from Africa to Europe for anyone who wants to come.

There are two main lies we’re given by our rulers to justify their policy of flooding our countries with these people.

Lie 1: we’re fed the story that, as Europeans have fewer children and their societies become older, we’ll need these migrants (sorry, I meant ‘refugees’) to do the jobs we no longer have the people to do. This is untrue as most of these migrants are illiterate and unemployable and intend to live off benefits and crime when they reach Europe.

Lie 2: We’re told that allowing these people into Europe will help alleviate poverty in Africa. But hold on, the population of Africa will increase by over 30 million people every year between now and the end of this century, so how many should we ferry to Europe each year? One million? Five million? Maybe even ten million a year? However many it is, this won’t make the slightest dent in Africa’s teeming, ever-increasing, impoverished hordes.

How Europe and the West handles the African population explosion is probably the most important issue facing our civilisation.

And it’s an issue our rulers don’t dare discuss.

Is Canada becoming North America’s Sweden?

There are several similarities between Sweden and Canada. Both are cold northern countries with loads of forests and lakes and rather few people. Moreover, until recently both were extremely boring places where nothing newsworthy ever happened. At least that was the case for Sweden before it flung open its borders to every piece of primitive, inbred, violent, illiterate, unemployable, Third-World garbage who fancied a life living off Sweden’s generous benefits system.

Welcome to Swedistan

I have written before about a UN report – the Human Development Index (HDI) – which tries to estimate how countries will develop or decline between 2010 and 2030.

Virtually all countries are projected to improve their citizens’ lives.

But there is one glaring exception. According to UN projections, unlike its Nordic neighbours and unlike all other developed countries, Sweden will be a much poorer country by 2030. This seems to be something the Swedish Government has ‘forgotten’ to tell its voters:

Sweden less developed ve developed countries

In 2010 Sweden was at 15th place in the HDI rankings. But Sweden has dropped to 25th last year and by 2030 will be 45th. I wonder why the BBC and Channel 4 have decided not to run this story.

Moreover most of today’s less developed countries such as Cuba, Mexico, the Baltic countries and Bulgaria will pass Sweden in prosperity according to the UN report:

Sweden less developed vs developing countries

The main reason for Sweden’s expected decline will be a massive increase in the number of households living off welfare. And that, of course, is mostly due to uncontrolled Third-World immigration.

What’s worse is that this report was produced before the current migration invasion which is seeing over 110,000 Third-Worlders pouring into Sweden each year. So Sweden’s decline will actually be much faster than the UN report predicts.

As for once being ‘boring’ – well now Sweden is often in the news with its regular riots in its 50+ no-go areas, its ever-rising rape levels and its very own terrorist truck attack in the centre of Stockholm. Sweden’s migrants have certainly livened the place up a bit.

Welcome to Canadistan

Now for Canada. There are four developments in Canada recently which suggest that Canada has decided to follow Sweden’s example of turning a once successful, civilised country into a Third-World cess-pit.

1. Canada’s Tony Blair

The election of Canada’s Tony Blair – Justin Trudeau. With his film-star looks and holier-than-thou self-righteousness, Mr Trudeau is so ‘progressive’ that it could make your eyes water:

2. Increased immigration

Since the wonderful achievement of Donald Trump winning the the US presidency against the candidate of the whole progressive establishment – Crooked Hillary – there has apparently been a flood of Third-Worlders fleeing from the USA for a better life (more benefits) in Canada.

More Third-World freeloaders arrived in the first three months of 2017 than arrived in the whole of several previous years.

3. Anti-Islamophobia motion

Under the ever so liberal, ever so progressive Trudeau, Canada has recently passed a motion targeting supposed “Islamophobia” to “quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear”. The non-binding motion, known as M-103 was passed by 201 votes to 91. Liberal MP Irqa Khalid, who tabled the motion, was cheered loudly by her party as the vote passed.

Conservative MP David Anderson put forward an amendment to the motion to try and change the wording to include other religions. He argued the motion should be to “condemn all forms of systemic racism, religious intolerance and discrimination of Muslims, Jews, Christians, Sikhs, Hindus and other religious communities”. But the amendment was rejected by Mr Trudeau’s Liberals.

4. Protecting citizenship for terrorists

The Canadian upper house – the Senate – passed Bill C-6 on Wednesday (May 3, 2017) after debating for almost a year on changes affecting citizenship, children’s rights and language requirements.

Bill C-6 which proposes changes to the Citizenship Act, removes the right to revoke citizenship from dual nationals who are convicted terrorists; ends the obligation for new citizens 14 -18 and 55 -65 to know either English or French; reduces the number of days someone must spend in Canada before they are eligible for citizenship; minors can apply for citizenship independent of their parents.

Bye, bye Canada?

I wonder if I’m really the only person who can see where Trudeau’s Canada is heading?

Down the same path as Sweden?

A £677,600,000 a year home-buying rip-off? And lots of happy surveyors and solicitors?

The expensive mess

There are about 1,100,000 homes sold in England and Wales each year. Of these around 28% of sales (308,000) fall through. The main reasons for sales falling through seem to be things like adverse surveys, gazumping/gazundering, incompetent/lazy solicitors and chains breaking down.

The average cost of a collapsed sale is around £2,200 per potential buyer.

So, multiplying 308,000 failed sales by £2,200 loss per potential buyer we arrive as a figure of £677,600,000 paid out to surveyors and solicitors by potential home-buyers for absolutely nothing in return. Without this wasted £677,600,000, our surveyors and solicitors would be an awful lot poorer.

Having just been through the process of buying and selling a home in England, I was shocked by how inefficient and poorly designed the process was. And I was particularly struck by how the current system seems designed to make surveyors and solicitors rich at home-buyers’ expense.

Well,’ you might think, ‘Mr Craig. If you’re so smart how do you suggest things should be changed?’

In fact I do know how things should be changed. I know this, not because I’m smart, but because I’ve bought and sold homes in Denmark where probably less than 1% to 2% of sales fall through.

The key issue distinguishing buying a home from buying a car or a washing machine or a new smartphone with a gazillion functions that you’ll never actually use is that you don’t know the condition of the home until weeks after you’ve made your offer. Moreover during the two to three months (or more) that your survey and searches and other paperwork are done, either you or the seller can walk away.

You  might walk because you’ve found somewhere better or changed your mind about moving or unsuccessfully tried to gazunder the seller or failed to sell your home or been unable to raise the mortgage or whatever. Or the seller might walk because they’ve received a better (gazumping) offer or changed their mind about selling or been unable to buy the home they wanted etc etc.

All this creates months of often nailbiting uncertainty for buyers and sellers and lots of welcome extra work for surveyors and solicitors.

Trust a surveyor?

Moreover, as I’ve found, you can’t trust a surveyor’s report in England and Wales. Most surveyors will only work with you once in their lives. But they’ll work with local estate agents hundreds or even thousands of times in their careers. And most will get much of their work from being recommended by local estate agents. So, surveyors will be reluctant to point out too many faults in a property as, if they get a reputation among estate agents for being ‘difficult’ and causing lost sales, they soon won’t have much work and won’t be able to pay their mortgages and their children’s private schooling. Therefore, you can expect any survey to be strongly biased in favour of covering over faults to ensure the sale goes ahead.

Trust a solicitor?

As for solicitors – the word ‘incompetent’ is far too polite to describe the way they manage many home sales. Important papers are lost, they’re usually far too busy to be contacted, weeks can pass before they show any sign of activity and if there’s something they can bungle, they most certainly will.

The easy solution

Let’s look at how homes are bought and sold in Denmark:

Firstly, it is the responsibility of the seller to produce a Home Information Pack which includes a survey and other necessary information. This Home Information Pack is provided to all potential buyers immediately they contact an estate agent about a property.

‘Ah ha,’ you might think, ‘if the seller provides the Home Information Pack, then it will be biased in favour of getting the sale’. Good thinking, Sherlock! But the Danish system includes checks and balances to prevent this happening. When you make an offer and that offer is accepted, a contract is made and neither buyer nor seller can walk away. As part of that contract the buyer and seller each pay 50% of the cost of ‘Ejerskifteforsikring’ (Change of Ownership Insurance). This  Change of Ownership Insurance covers the buyer for anything that wan’t found out during the survey and searches done when the seller commissioned the Home Information Pack. So, if it is later discovered that there is subsidence or an airport being built in the back garden of the property you’ve bought, your losses should be covered by the insurance you and the seller have paid for.

Trust a surveyor?

In the Danish system, you can trust the surveyor’s report. Why? Because if any surveyor repeatedly covers up faults which later lead to claims on the Change of Ownership Insurance, that surveyor will soon be boycotted by the insurance companies and soon be very poor indeed

Trust a solicitor?

Because the contract between buyer and seller is established immediately the offer is accepted, however much the lazy or incompetent solicitors make a hash of things that won’t really affect the process too much and won’t lead to the sale falling through.

Why not improve the process?

“If the Danish system is so much better,” you may ask, “why not just adopt the Danish system in England and Wales?” And that brings us back to the title of today’s blog – the dreadful English and Welsh systems with biased surveyors, incompetent/lazy solicitors, broken chains, gazumping and gazundering, multiple surveys for each property, several solicitors working for potential buyers for each property and all its other delays and duplications produces an extra £677,600,000 each year for our surveyors and solicitors.

That’s money they’ll fight tooth and nail to keep flooding into their bank accounts at the expense of property buyers and sellers.

It’s a pity no mainstream media journalist or property expert has thought to mention how easy it would be to revolutionise the way properties are bought and sold in England and Wales. It’s a pity no journalist or property expert has dared to rock the surveyors’ and solicitors’ lucrative boat.

It this a rip-off? Yes it is!

Islamic shampoo ads

Oh, and in case you were wondering (as I often do) how shampoo companies advertise their products in Muslim countries where it’s illegal to show women’s hair, here’s the answer. Good grief!

Will Britain have to rescue the “surrender monkeys” yet again?

Most readers will have probably heard of “Godwin’s Law”.

Godwin’s law (or Godwin’s rule of Hitler analogies) is an Internet adage which asserts that “As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Hitler approaches 1” ‍—‌that is, if an online discussion (regardless of topic or scope) goes on long enough, sooner or later someone will compare someone or something to Hitler or his deeds.

Godwin formulated his Law to warn against the incidence of inappropriate hyperbolic comparisons. “Although deliberately framed as if it were a law of nature or of mathematics….. I wanted folks who glibly compared someone else to Hitler to think a bit harder about the Holocaust”.

Well, in today’s blog, I’m afraid I’m going to prove Mr Godwin right. I’ll be doing some comparisons of Europe today to Europe of 1940. But sadly, I don’t think I’m making any ‘hyperbolic comparisons’.

Let’s start with the winner of last Sunday’s French presidential election. Here he is in all his glory – the French poodle:

The French poodle is a rather unpleasant over-dressed, over-coiffed, pampered creature – not like a real dog at all.

The new French president is vainglorious, self-admiring and married to his former schoolteacher – not a real man at all.

And here are two French poodles:

And here’s the two French poodles’ owner:

She seems to be telling her French poodles to go and fetch something. No doubt her French poodles obey her every command.

Anyone who thinks that the latest French poodle – globalist, pro-immigration, pro-Islamisation banker Macron is going to defend France’s interest is either a fool or mad.

I’ve written previously about Mark Twain’s well-known quote; “History doesn’t repeat itself but it rhymes”.

But what did Mark Twain mean? I believe the quote refers to the fact that different nationalities have their own characteristics and therefore, even though the historical context will change, each nationality will still react to each situation according to its national characteristics.

Applying that to the recent French presidential elections, I propose:

  • the German national character of obedience, hard work, self-righteousness and arrogance will always push the Germans to try to dominate other European countries either militarily (WW1 and WW2) or economically (the German-controlled EU)
  • the French national character of empty vanity, cowardice and pomposity will always cause the French to surrender to their German neighbours
  • the British national character of belief in democracy and freedom will always lead to the British opposing German domination of Europe

The result of these national characteristics has twice led to situations where France’s abject surrender to Germany has caused the French to come bleating to Britain begging us to save them from German rule. They’ve done this twice and each time have repaid Britain’s sacrifice of blood and resources with precious little gratitude.

If, in a few years time, the cheese-eating surrender monkeys come grovelling to us yet again demanding we save them from German rule, I hope we’ll tell them to get lost.

They said it was “multi-culturalism”, but they lied. They said they were “refugees”, but….

Supposed “fake news” is a hot topic at the moment for the mainstream media. And today Facebook has apparently placed expensive full-page ads in the main newspapers advising us how to spot what they call “false news”.

But what is “fake news” or “false news”? And who is lying to us? The alternative (usually Internet-based) news sites like the wonderful Breitbart and my own humble efforts. Or the mainstream media?

For decades we have been fed a torrent of lies by the mainstream media.

For example, multi-culturalism has been shoved down our throats. And who could argue with the proposition that different cultures could live happily alongside each other? But we didn’t get multi-culturalism. Instead Islamification was forced on us:

They told us that ships from the EU and charities were “rescuing” drowning migrants. But they weren’t “rescuing” anyone. They were just sitting just outside Libyan territorial waters providing a free ferry service to Europe to anyone who wanted to come:

And around six thousand African benefits-scrounging migrants availed themselves of our free ferry service last weekend alone.

Then they told us we had to accept up to two thousand helpless “child refugees” from the appropriately-named Jungle in Calais. But, of course, most weren’t “child refugees”, they were fully grown adult migrants of military age:

And the more who arrive, the higher the rape and other crime figures will rise.

And now we hear that it’s good news that the EU’s and Angela ‘Mad Cow’ Merkel’s candidate for the French presidential elections has soundly beaten a supposedly right-wing quasi-fascist. But what the mainstream media has been desperately failing to report is the extraordinary level of migrant violence across Paris.

Oh, and when Merkel’s new French poodle, banker Macron, walked on stage at his victory rally  last night, they played the EU anthem (Beethoven’s Ode to Joy) rather than the French national anthem, the Marseillaise. So, we’re already beginning to see where europhiliac Macron’s real loyalties lie – and they’re not with his country.

Anyway, in case you were considering a trip to the French capital, perhaps the scenes in the video below (only available on the Internet and not reported in the mainstream media) will make you reconsider?

I agree with Facebook. There’s plenty of “fake news” or “false news” out there. But most of it comes from the BBC and Channel 4 and the main newspapers. Increasingly the Internet is the only place we can find out what’s really going on. And that’s why our rulers in London and Brussels and Berlin are urgently pressuring the main Internet companies with threats of fines and even criminal charges to censor what they publish. If this carries on, soon the only news we’ll have will be officially-sanctioned, mainstream media fake news.


Shared hatred of white males creates the strangest of political bedfellows

(weekend blog – I’ve sort of adapted this from someone else’s blog. Apologies for being a quasi-plagiarist)

Let’s spare a few moments to consider two groups of people who should be sworn enemies. But instead they are fiercely united in their shared hatred for white males and the advanced, Western, freedom-loving society the two groups seem to loathe to an equal degree.

Who are these strangest of bedfellows? They’re Islamists and Feminists, of course.

Here are just a few similarities between these two absurdly self-absorbed groups:

  • Both share an intense narcissism of the kind that makes them arrogant and weak at the same time.
  • Both employ passive/aggressive techniques to disguise themselves as vulnerable victims as opposed to the cut-throat psychological warriors they are.
  • Both will use their ostensible victim status either as a shield or a sword, depending on what gets results.
  • To remain a member in good standing of either group requires strict adherence to a rigid orthodoxy. No deviating here or there!
  • They both dress rather oddly.
  • Both hate Christian, white, males with equal vehemence

Both have a strong “end justifies the means” attitude thus allowing them to work together in a twisted, politically-convenient alignment. They’ll collaborate to destroy their common enemy and leave the pesky details of what to do with each other for later.

They think they’re right about everything, an easy claim since neither group accepts the idea of an “objective truth” from which to judge rightness.  In the face of irrefutable evidence that might suggest continuing to believe something would make one delusional, they’ll maintain the lie.

Both also lack a sense of humour. Irony? Satire? Lampooning? Sarcasm? NOT FUNNY! If you’re looking for someone to have a beer and a few laughs with, look elsewhere unless you can follow this simple rule about acceptable humour – as long as you’re “punching up” (i.e. target is either a white man and/or a conservative of any race or gender) you can say whatever you want and they’ll think it’s hilarious.

Their motivation for activism begins with a grievance, or more usually perceived grievance, which they’ll cling to at all costs.

Complain, complain, complain. Statistics from employment tribunals would probably show that Muslims and Feminists are the most frequent complainers.

Both tread a fine line between using victimhood to gain political advantage, while simultaneously asserting their superiority over those they loathe.

Both prey on and use damaged people when recruiting for the cause.  Well-balanced, functioning individuals can’t be turned into screaming banshees or murderous jihadists.

Both know how to use guilt to paralyse their opposition. Having successfully convinced us of our white and/or male privilege, the rest of us increasingly self-censor for fear of being labelled either “Islamophobes” or “misogynists”.

We’ve been taken for fools by both. In a condescending gesture of showing kindness to emotional retards, we’ve allowed the bar of acceptable behavior to sink ever lower so that the lunatics are indeed running the asylum.

A question for you – during April, how many countries were hit by Religion of Peace attacks?

Like me you probably thought that most Religion of the Future murders took place in the usual hell-holes – Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Egypt etc.

So, here’ a question for you – during April, how many countries were hit by Religion of Peace and Terror attacks? Five? Ten? Maybe fifteen? Possibly more? What do you think?

In fact, during the past month, there were 141 religiously inspired attacks in no fewer than 24 countries, in which 1,109 people were killed and 808 injured. So, Religion of Peace slaughter is not something confined to a few stinking, corrupt, incompetently-run Arab cesspits and the occasional incident in Europe. Instead it’s something that is happening around the world in many more places and much more frequently than our mainstream media report.

During April, in addition to the usual Arab hell-holes, there were Religion of Peace murders in relatively civilised countries like the USA, Germany, France, Sweden, Thailand, the Philippines, the Maldives, India and Russia.

Could it possibly be the case that we are actually at the beginning of World War III and our rulers don’t dare admit this as it would lead to civil war throughout Europe?

Here are just the last seven days of our friends from the Religion of Love doing what they do best.

To list all of April’s Religion of Happiness murders would take up too much space.

Date Country City Killed Injured Description
2017.05.03 Afghanistan Kabul 8 25 Eight civilians are torn limb from limb by a Fedayeen suicide bomber.
2017.05.03 Pakistan Rahim Yar Khan 1 0 A 63-year-old Ahmadi religious minority is brutally gunned down by Sunni radicals.
2017.05.02 Syria Rajim Salibi 46 34 A 3-month-old baby is among forty-six refugees proudly massacred by Islamic State suicide bombers.
2017.05.01 Iraq Rifai 5 0 Islamic militants open fire on five young children searching for food, bringing down all five.
2017.04.30 Afghanistan Mazar-e-Sharif 2 5 Taliban bombers pick off a family on their way to a wedding.
2017.04.30 Syria Daraa 1 0 An alleged ‘sorcerer’ is beheaded by caliphate members.
2017.04.29 Iraq Rifai 5 0 Four women and a child are executed for trying to flee the Islamic State.
2017.04.29 Iraq Mosul 3 2 Three humanitarian workers are blown to bits by an ISIS rocket while distributing food.
2017.04.29 Iraq Jurf al-Sakhar 1 10 One other person is killed when a suicide bomber detonates outside a market.
2017.04.29 Germany Prien am Chiemsee 1 0 A woman is stabbed to death in front of her two children over her decision to leave Islam for Christianity.
2017.04.29 Yemen Lahij 1 8 An al-Qaeda attack leaves one dead.
2017.04.29 Iraq Bab al-Toub 14 20 Fourteen Iraqis are blown to bits by a Fedayeen suicide bomber.
2017.04.28 Saudi Arabia Qatif 1 0 A 33-year-old man is kidnapped from a café and executed by suspected Shiite radicals.
2017.04.28 Iraq Baghdad 3 8 A suicide bomber detonates in a police station, killing three bystanders.
2017.04.28 Nigeria Manguzum 5 40 Five Nigerians are taken out by a Shahid suicide car bomber.
2017.04.27 Somalia Mogadishu 1 0 A man is gunned down in front of his home by al-Shabaab.
2017.04.27 Pakistan Faqirabad 2 0 Two people are gunned down at a rival mosque, one of whom was a cleric.
2017.04.27 India Kupwara 3 0 Three security personnel lose their lives to an attack by Jaish-e-Mohammad.
2017.04.27 France Reunion 0 2 An Islamic radical shoots two police officers.
2017.04.27 Iraq Mosul 3 5 A suicide bomber kills three policemen tricked into trying to help him.
2017.04.27 Thailand Narathiwat 6 0 Muslim ‘insurgents’ murder six security personnel with a roadside bomb

Let us thank this preacher for telling the truth

The short (just over a minute) video below features an obvious madman claiming to be from the Religion of Love and Friendliness.

Of course, the man is crazy. After all, he’s predicting that Germany will eventually become a Muslim country, that Germans’ daughters will marry Muslims and that in a few generations a German Muslim parliament will adopt Sharia Law.

I mean how likely is that?

Oh, you mean with declining German birth rates and a million often inbred, low-IQ, violent, intolerant, rape-obsessed Third-World invaders pouring into the country each and every year, this could happen well before the end of the 21st Century?

Oh dear. Mrs Merkel forgot to tell us that this was her ultimate goal, that this was the legacy she wanted to leave – the total destruction of her country.

(By the way. It seems that all the mainstream media are claiming that gerontologist {nudge nudge, wink wink} Emmanuel Macron easily won last night’s debate with the Front National’s Marine Le Pen. But Breitbart London website thankfully dares to take a different view. There is one of Marine Le Pen’s more memorable comments that the British mainstream media will probably ‘forget’ to mention “Whoever wins on Sunday, France will be governed by a woman – myself or Mrs Merkel”. Wow, nice uppercut Marine. Let’s see ‘I-married-my-teacher’ mummy’s boy Macron live that one down)

“Everybody matters more than you do!”

I’ve been musing on how ‘ordinary people’ must feel about today’s society in which they live.

And I’ve come up with the line “Everybody matters more than you do!”

Actually, let me change that from ‘ordinary people’ to ‘normal people’. Politicians use the expression ‘ordinary people’ when referring to the suckers who pay their massive packages of salary and expenses which cost us around £250,000 to £300,000 a year for each of our 650 mostly useless, self-serving MPs.

What are ‘normal people‘?

But before I explain “Everybody matters more than you do!”, let me suggest some attributes of what I would call ‘normal people’:

  • have jobs (or have had jobs and have since retired) and so have worked and paid taxes
  • believe sex is something that should happen between males and females
  • are neither hugely overweight  nor underweight
  • don’t want their country to be swamped by a tsunami of violent, inbred, low-IQ, intolerant, medieval subhumans
  • don’t want Britain to be a subservient part of a Fourth Reich – a resurgent German European empire
  • try to bring their children up to understand the value of education and a career
  • understand that the earth’s climate is changing and has always changed and that this is just something we must adapt to
  • feel ill whenever they hear the words ‘diversity’ and ‘tolerance’ because they know that ‘tolerance’ is a one-way street whereby the indigenous white population must be tolerant of those who are permanently intolerant
Who “matters more than you do”?

Now let’s get on to the people who “matter more than you do“. To find out who they are you just have to watch any BBC or Channel 4 news programme and you’ll see a seemingly endless stream of supposed ‘victims’ of something or other whose needs must be prioritised over those of ‘normal people’:

  • the fat/obese and stupid who are unable to control their greed and so demand that food manufacturers are forced to include contents and calorie information (which they never read anyway) on each packet that is almost as long as War and Peace
  • the excessively thin who claim to have fashionable ‘eating disorders’ and demand that advertising be censored as it is clearly unrealistic advertising, rather than their own immature self-obsession, that is responsible for their conditions
  • the infertile or those who have left it too late to have children who are so convinced of the need to continue their own wonderful genes that they demand that the rest of us pay millions each year for their IVF treatment on the NHS rather than paying for their own procreation or else just adopting a needy orphan
  • idiots who want every activity we do discouraged through ever higher taxation because they are convinced that every time the sun shines this is irrefutable proof of ‘Man-Made Global Warming’ and every time the sun doesn’t shine this is irrefutable proof of ‘Man-Made Climate Change’
  • those with psychological problems and supposed ‘gender issues’ who want to overturn conventional wisdom about male and female to justify their own flawed sense of self-image
  • leftists and libtards who protest and riot demanding the censorship of anyone with sufficient intellectual abilities to dare to challenge their most cherished prejudices
  • Third-World, violent, West-hating migrants/invaders (mostly from our favourite death cult masquerading as a religion) whose vociferous demands for free housing, free healthcare, free education, free money, free everything are always prioritised above the needs of the indigenous white population
  • Middle-East savages (from Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, Egypt) who have been made homeless and impoverished because their own violence and intolerance prevent them living in peace with each other
  • young African men who can’t live in their own countries because their breeding rate (with populations doubling every 20 years) far exceeds the capacity of their countries to support them
  • billionaire corrupt, oppressive, incompetent African kleptocrats who need ever more of our money to be stashed away in their offshore bank accounts

Anyway, these are just a few of the people who “matter more than you do”. I’m sure my readers could click on the title of today’s blog and use the ‘comments’ function to add many more examples to my list.

Dumb, dumber and the Religion of Low IQs

I’ve previously brought you videos of our friends from the Religion of the Mentally Challenged trying to cope with an escalator and trying to mow a lawn with an electric lawn-mower that wasn’t plugged in.

Today, here’s a video of one of these morons trying to navigate his way through some automated doors.

Good grief!!!!!