David Craig, on May 26th, 2013For more than obvious reasons, I must be careful about what I write today. So, I’ll make a few very brief observations and then refer you to a YouTube video made by an American ridiculing our politicians and journalists as they desperately try to explain away the Woolwich murder http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=SH7Ty8iPh5c
(I’m afraid it’s 9 minutes long. But the first 3-4 minutes where the person quotes extensively from the Koran is quite enough to expose the dishonesty of the politically-correct establishment)
Anyway, here are some establishment reactions to the murder:
THE GUARDIAN
Sit down and take a deep breath. In a Leader article discussing the murder of a British soldier, hacked to death by devout Muslims, one of the Guardian’s conclusions was: “Our research shows that EDL supporters are more likely than others in society to view violence as a justifiable course of action”.
Um, hold on a minute. Who hacked the soldier to death? Overweight, beer-bellied, shaven-headed, barely literate British right-wingers? No, they were devout Mulsims following what they thought was their duty as specified in the Koran.
Who was responsible for the London tube and bus bombings? Overweight, beer-bellied, shaven-headed, barely literate British right-wingers? No, they were devout Muslims following what they thought was their duty as specified in the Koran.
In fact, I’m struggling to remember any incident when the EDL or any other right-wing group made up of overweight, beer-bellied, shaven-headed, barely literate British right-wingers have murdered anyone claiming they were “doing God’s will”
THE POLICE
As for our politically-correct, useless police. Two Muslim madmen hack a soldier to death – the police take 15 to 20 minutes to arrive. A few overweight, beer-bellied, shaven-headed, barely literate EDL supporters with flags congregate near an underground station – police take 2 minutes to arrive.
Perhaps interestingly, the Swedish police have taken exactly the same politically-correct course as the British police. When immigrant youths started rioting and burning cars, homes and businesses, the police decided not to intervene in order to “calm the situation”. But when groups of Swedes started forming to try to protect their cars, homes and businesses, they were immediately arrested.
THE POLITICIANS
Tameena Hussain on Conservative Home: “The Woolwich horror was not, repeat not, caused by Islam” This assertion was (as you will see in the YouTube film) repeatedly used by both David Cameron and Boris Johnson. And, of course, Clegg and Miliband parroted the same message.
Yet, anyone with a knowledge of the Koran, particularly Chapter 9 (as the YouTube video helpfully shows), would know that what the British establishment are saying is absolutely not what Islam’s holy book tells its believers.
Category: 
They’re not all overweight beer swilling morons. Tommy Robinson, although an impulsive berk at times, did a great job on the sneering Paxman a while back. That video is getting hundreds of view each hour. Someone please post it on Conservative Home blog. I’ve been banned.
The scum bag media even censored the words spoken by the Islamic terrorist in Woolwich. They broadcast the following…
“we must fight them as they fight us, an eye for an eye
and a tooth for a tooth. I apologize that women had to witness this today but in our land women have to see the same. You people will never be safe. Remove your government, they don’t care about you.”
But they deliberately chose not to broadcast the beginning of his sentence where he justifies his act and says…
“There are many, many ayah throughout the Koran [referring to religious verses] that says…”
The full uncensored video is available on LiveLeak at…
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=51a_1369263651
Found this at Harry’s place. Bo-Jo cannot claim ignorance
Dcook • 8 hours ago −
Boris Johnson, I have a like for you but I’m afraid you seem to be a lying hippocrite when you support the latest government lie that this has nothing to do with Islam or is a perversion of Islam.
It was YOU who during the debate on the Racial and Religious Hatred Bill who quoted passages from the Koran.
You said this:-
During the debate, Johnson read out various excerpts from the Koran regarding the treatment of non-Muslims, including sura 22:19, which read in translation: “As for the unbelievers, for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowels and skins shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods.”
Johnson said while the Koran was not “unique in its hostility to other creeds,” he challenged a government minister to explain “why and how you think the repetition of those words in a public or a private place does not amount to an incitement to religious hatred of exactly the kind this bill is supposed to ban.”
So, by your own words you have stated that the Koran contains passages of Racial and Religious incitement. Yet, you now deny it. http://www.crosswalk.com/print…
Perhaps you should read the Koran on adultery!
“A few overweight, beer-bellied, shaven-headed, barely literate EDL supporters with flags…”
These blokes may be as you describe them…
But one thing they ain’t is “right wing”.