Friday blog
Yesterday in my blog, I did some fairly simple arithmetic. This showed that, were Britain to deindustrialise and completely bankrupt the country at the altar of Net Zero, this could possible reduce atmospheric CO2 levels by an ‘impressive’ 3.4 millionths of a percent. Of course, this 3.4 millionths of a percent reduction would be dependent on no other country increasing their CO2 emissions. But that doesn’t seem to be happening:

So, Britain is committing societal and economic suicide for absolutely no purpose at all.
Yesterday’s arithmetic was clearly too complex for our useless rulers. So, today I’ve got a much simpler arithmetic puzzle for the loathsome Starmer and his motley band of UK-hating, WEF-puppet nobodies
In/out, in/out shake it all about
Let’s imagine there’s an island called Britain. And let’s imagine this island is ruled by a UK-despising, Davos-adoring, spineless, liar and coward – Keir ‘not queer’ Starmer – who has never had anything to do with alleged Ukrainian alleged rent boys.
This piece of loathsome garbage, Starmer, does a deal with (capitulation to?) a granny-bothering, perfumed, pompous French popinjay called Mr Macron.
Let’s take a typical week where 1,000 mostly uneducated, mostly unemployable, mostly backward, mostly criminal, mostly sex-obsessed illegal migrants are helped on their way to Britain by the pompous French popinjay’s police and navy and then are ferried in luxury to Britain by spineless, treacherous Starmer’s pointless Border Farce:

But Mr Starmer has done a ‘ground-breaking’ deal with the French granny-botherer whereby Mr Starmer will send 50 Third-World illegals back to France and in return Mr Starmer will take another 50 Third-Worlders from France.
Now children, here’s the question: If this ‘ground-breaking deal’ happens, how many mostly uneducated, mostly unemployable, mostly backward, mostly criminal, mostly sex-obsessed illegal migrants will remain in Britain that week? Is it:
- 1,050
- 1,000
- 950
- zero because this ingenious plan has ‘broken the evil people-smugglers’ business model‘ and ‘stopped the boats’ as Mr Starmer promised us.
You can send your answers on a postcard of a Union Jack to Mr Starmer, c/o Larry the Cat, Downing Street, Londonistan because Starmer clearly doesn’t know the answer to this question.
What about the fat lady?
To cheer us all up, for something completely different here’s a gravitationally-challenged lady being helped onto a plane. There’s something about this very short video which seems to sum up much that is wrong with Western society:
What stands out with these two items, is that with climate change, science and simple common sense can be used to identify the problems. The latest Starmer deal on migrants makes no sense to anybody, even to him.
I have just found the perfect description of Starmer and many others in Ayn Rand’s definition of “second-handers”. This is part of what she says:
“Isn’t that the root of every despicable action? Not selfishness, but precisely the absence of a self. Look at them. The man who cheats and lies, but preserves a respectable front. He knows himself to be dishonest, but others think he’s honest and he derives his self-respect from that, second-hand. The man who takes credit for an achievement which is not his own. He knows himself to be mediocre, but he’s great in the eyes of others. The frustrated wretch who professes love for the inferior and clings to those less endowed, in order to establish his own superiority by comparison . . . . They’re second-handers . . . .
They have no concern for facts, ideas, work. They’re concerned only with people. They don’t ask: “Is this true?” They ask: “Is this what others think is true?” Not to judge, but to repeat. Not to do, but to give the impression of doing. Not creation, but show. Not ability, but friendship. Not merit, but pull. What would happen to the world without those who do, think, work, produce? Those are the egoists. You don’t think through another’s brain and you don’t work through another’s hands. When you suspend your faculty of independent judgment, you suspend consciousness. To stop consciousness is to stop life. Second-handers have no sense of reality. Their reality is not within them, but somewhere in that space which divides one human body from another. Not an entity, but a relation—anchored to nothing. That’s the emptiness I couldn’t understand in people. That’s what stopped me whenever I faced a committee. Men without an ego. Opinion without a rational process. Motion without brakes or motor. Power without responsibility. The second-hander acts, but the source of his actions is scattered in every other living person. It’s everywhere and nowhere and you can’t reason with him. He’s not open to reason.”