February 2023
« Jan    

Watch out kids! Jabberman is coming to get you!

Thursday/Friday blog

I’m afraid it’s jabs for kids again today because I believe this story is important.

I just wanted to do two things:

  • recap two issues from my Tuesday/Wednesday blog
  • look at a new assault on our kids by the jab-fanatics – Jabberman

Fooled by the vaccine fanatics? Yet again?

There are two issues which arise from my Tuesday/Wednesday blog:

Issue 1 – At what age should we be vaccinating?

In my Tuesday/Wednesday blog I questioned whether 3 vaccinated children aged between 5 and 11 catching the Chinese Wuhan plague compared to 16 unvaccinated children (out of 1,305 in a trial), really was a sufficiently large statistical sample to justify vaccinating tens of millions of EU children.

I suspect that our vaccine-obsessed rulers have painted themselves into a corner. Having bludgeoned us all into being vaccinated, often using mandates and other forms of coercion, they could hardly admit that the risks of vaccinating children aged 5 to 11 outweighed the benefits.

After all, if our rulers suggested that there was no point vaccinating 5- to 11-year-olds, people might start asking at what age should we not be vaccinating – is really 11 years old? Or could it be 12 or 13 or 20 or 25? And that would open an enormous can of worms as people began to question at what age did the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Then the whole vaccinate vaccinate vaccinate strategy would start to fall apart.

Issue 2 – Does the research really justify vaccinating children?

The research used by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to justify jabbing children was based on the fact that in a study only 3 of the vaccinated children caught the WuFlu compared to 16 children in the group which received a vaccine placebo. That allowed the EMA bureaucrats to claim that children who were not vaccinated were more than 5 times more likely to get the WuFlu than vaccinated children.

But let’s turn the figures round. There were 1,305 children in the study. I guess that about 652 got the real vaccine and another 652 got the placebo vaccine. So, out of the 652 vaccinated, 3 (0.5%) got WuFlu and 649 didn’t. But perhaps more interesting is the fact that of those with the placebo vaccine, 16 (2.5%) got the WuFlu and 636 (97.5%) didn’t.

Of course, I don’t know how long the study lasted and maybe many of those with the placebo vaccine got the WuFlu after the study ended. Our numerically-illiterate politicians and similarly numerically-illiterate mainstream-media journalists enthusiastically and sycophantically swallowed the supposed experts’ claims that unvaccinated children were 5 times more likely to get the WuFlu than the vaccinated. But nobody seems to have noticed that 97.5% of the children with the placebo vaccine didn’t get the WuFlu either.

Does a WuFlu infection rate of 2.5% of children, none of whom as far as I know had any serious medical problems from the WuFlu, really justify expensively (but profitably for Pfizer and Moderna) vaccinating tens of millions of 5- to 11-year-olds?

I don’t think so!

Carry on jabbing and jabbing and jabbing

On Tuesday this week Pfizer and BioNTech announced they have submitted an application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for emergency use authorization of a booster dose of their coronavirus vaccine for children ages 5 to 11.

The companies said in a press release that data showed that children under 12 had a “strong immune response” from a booster dose. A third booster shot after six months is believed to raise Omicron-fighting antibodies by 36 times.

Earlier this month, Pfizer released data from their lab study of a third dose. In the study, 140 subjects between the ages of 5 and 11, with no evidence of prior COVID-19 infection, were given a third 10-microgram dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine at least six months after their second dose of the shot.

One month later, a subset of 30 test subjects showed that the Omicron-fighting antibodies had increased 36-fold. Pfizer and BioNTech claimed that “a robust response was observed regardless of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.”

So, here we go again. We have a supposed study commissioned by a body which benefited from ever more jabbing our kids claiming that we should carry on jabbing and jabbing and jabbing.

And how big was this latest study? Just 140 children of which only 30 apparently displayed a large increase in Omicron-fighting antibodies. I wonder what happened to the other 110?

Meanwhile another study seemed to suggest that developing natural immunity from previous infection was just as good as, if not better than, ever more costly vaccinations:

Tuesday’s application to the FDA comes just as a new study from the Centers for Disease Control found that most Americans had been infected with COVID at least once.

Using data from blood tests taken around the country, the CDC determined that 33.5% of Americans had COVID-19 antibodies that developed from infection, and not vaccination, in Dec. 2021. By Feb. 2022, that percentage had jumped significantly, up to 58%.

The biggest increase was in kids under 18 — by February, 75%, or 3 in 4 kids, had COVID-19 antibodies in their system.

Here’s the Pfizer big boss with his chum EU big boss Ursula Fond of Lying:

I wonder what this picture is telling us?????

So, watch out kids! The evil Pfizer Jabberman and the supine EU authorities are out to get you!

8 comments to Watch out kids! Jabberman is coming to get you!

  • Stillreading

    Mass insanity in the form of unquestioning compliance has gripped the majority of the population of the so-called Free World. I see it every day as I happily go about my life, walking around town, going in and out of shops and on and off buses, and witness my fellow beings (some years young than I) still obsessively masked to the eyebrows and regarding my unmasked visage with hostility. Being an octogenarian, I have already been invited to submit myself to a 4th jab. This I am declining to do. I’ve had the prevous three, the first two of which I was grateful to receive, since already being past my sell-by date, I acknowledged that if the first, most severe, version of the WuFlu were to get me it could quite possibly see me off. I took the 2nd jab, and then the 3rd, for the same reason, believing that I was thereby receiving lasting immunity. However, now we know that the immunity conferred by the vaccines lasts a mere three months, and furthermore than the Omicron and successive variants are increasingly benign and less life-threatening, it is evident that the programme of ongoing mass vaccination is not justified or justifiable. As for vaccinating the Nation’s (or any nation’s) children, given scientists’ obvious inability to predict potentially hazardous or harmful long-term effects, it seems nothing short of wicked. As someone in the age group most likely to die should I contract WuFlu, I consider myself fully entitled to state unambiguously that jabbing a child with a substance any long term effects of which cannot be known for some years, in order to hold off the demise of those of us whose ends are undeniably nigh anyway, can never be justified. Incidentally, a thrice-vaccinated younger family member, a healthy person of 50, has recently recovered from a bout of Omicron, unpleasant for five days, and her son, still in his twenties and double vaccinated, from a similar bout. Both apparently contracted it from contact with a group of vaccinated friends. So tell me, please, you so-called “experts” out there (if any if you read this blog, which I doubt!) whose “science” we are all adjured to “follow”, just what exactly is the point of vaccination since it self-evidently protects neither against contracting nor passing on the WuFlu? And above all, what, please, is the justification for vaccinating 5 year olds?

  • david craig

    Thank you for a great comment.

  • A Thorpe

    I cannot find any reference to the clinical studies on children, but I haven’t looked thoroughly. In the previous blog you reported different data, which was 1305 vaccinated and 663 given a placebo. However, you have done a good job in the example of describing why we should use the absolute risk reduction. Parents need to see the results of the clinical trials. The EMA and now Pfizer refer to trials. Are they the same trials?

    The more important aspect is that none of the trials for any age tell us what the vaccines are effective at doing and this is because their purpose was never declared. They must be the worst trials ever conducted. When the virus appeared it was all about the fear of dying and deaths were announced daily. The all cause mortality rate for 2020 shows no significant increase in deaths, so what was that all about? The trials did not set out to prove that there was a reduction in deaths, a reduction in hospitalisation, a reduction in serious illness,or prevention of infection and transmission of the disease. All we know is a few people were infected based on tests rather than a clinical examination of their condition. These trials must be the biggest health fraud in history.

    The other purpose of trials is to identify side effects of vaccines and no attempt was made to do this in any of trials. We should all remember thalidomide. We now have reports of thousands of incidents in the vaccine adverse event reporting systems, but this is not the way to identify incidents. They can only be accurately identified with trials and a placebo group. However, there obviously seems to be something wrong, but why are the health organisations ignoring this? The USA stopped a vaccination programme, I think for swine flu, some years ago when they rushed out a vaccine that resulted in just a few deaths. Why is nothing being done about the reported Covid incidents.

    Stillreading effectively answers his question in the last sentence. He knows there was no justification for anybody to have the vaccine, but they did it out of fear and trust in the medical profession and especially trust in Big Pharma. The media propaganda tells them now to vaccinate their children and have a fourth booster and they will do it.

  • Jeffrey Palmer

    The justification for vaccinating five-year-olds is, of course, money.

    That’s why the woman who single-handedly reduced the German armed forces to total impotence while defence minister of that country, is hugging one of the men man who has cheerfully profited from the biggest scam ever perpetrated in the Western world.

    As someone who has yet to recover from the effect of his third jab – a Pfizer one, after the previous two AZ – I can literally say that it makes me sick.

  • A Thorpe

    Slightly related to this, I have just seen a Sky News item saying that climate change will cause 15,000 new viruses mostly from bats by 2070. Strange that they still don’t know where Covid came from.

  • Paul Chambers

    I do not know how relevant this is to UK but given our government seem to act as the dem deepstate poodle i assume it applies here. Robert F Kennedy Junior author of the Fauci exposee has said:

    “They are never going to market a vaccine, allow people access to a vaccine, an approved vaccine without getting liability protection. Now the emergency use authorization vaccines have liability protection under the PREP Act and under the CARES Act.

    So as long as you take an emergency use vaccine, you can’t sue them. Once they get approved, now you can sue them, unless they can get it recommended for children. Because all vaccines that are recommended, officially recommended for children get liability protection, even if an adult gets that vaccine.

    That’s why they are going after the kids. They know this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children, but they need to do it for the liability protection.”

  • Hardcastle

    Although money is a major factor and has always been so for the pharmaceutical companies,the politicians have been more interested in control of populations.This is particularly true with the certainty of the collapse of the post war financial system.The disappearance òf the annual population cull from flu and pneumonia, to be replaced by this covid explains why the annual death rate is virtually around the average.Add in the massive propaganda and psych op campaign waged by the establishment and the bought media,it is little wonder that so many were and still are frightened out of their wits.I see no need for mass inoculation of the population at all,even fo those of advanced years and with morbid illness.As we age we are susceptible to increased infirmity and an increase in the possibility of death.Something gets us in the end,fact of life.To mass vaccinate the younger cohorts who are at little risk from most things is not logical or intelligent.This suggests to me an altogether different agenda than good health.To even consider injecting children is in my mind madness,irresponsible and evil in intent.I am 75 years of age and am fortunate to be in good health and without any medication.I therefore decided to forego the injections and have had no illness whatsoever in the past few years.I am however realistic enough to realise that something will come along in the not too distant future that will see my demise.At the moment my judgement is that I am more likely to die driving or taking an untested injection than from covid,if it exists.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>