February 2024
« Jan    

Is a sample size of 16 really a reliable basis for v*ccinating millions of children?

Tuesday/Wednesday blog

I just wanted to briefly compare two scientific studies of the effectiveness and effects of the mRNA ‘miracle’ v*ccines:

Effectiveness – the European Medicines Agency

Here’s what the European Medicines Agency (EMA) announced on 25 November 2021 when justifying giving tens of millions of children the mRNA v*ccine:

EMA’s human medicines committee (CHMP) has recommended granting an extension of indication for the COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty to include use in children aged 5 to 11. The vaccine, developed by BioNTech and Pfizer, is already approved for use in adults and children aged 12 and above.

In children from 5 to 11 years of age, the dose of Comirnaty will be lower than that used in people aged 12 and above (10 µg compared with 30 µg). As in the older age group, it is given as two injections in the muscles of the upper arm, three weeks apart. 

A main study in children aged 5 to 11 showed that the immune response to Comirnaty given at a lower dose (10 µg) in this age group was comparable to that seen with the higher dose (30 µg) in 16- to 25-year-olds (as measured by the level of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2). The efficacy of Comirnaty was calculated in almost 2,000 children from 5 to 11 years of age who had no sign of previous infection. These children received either the vaccine or a placebo (a dummy injection). Of the 1,305 children receiving the vaccine, three developed COVID-19 compared with 16 out of the 663 children who received placebo. This means that, in this study, the vaccine was 90.7% effective at preventing symptomatic COVID-19 (although the true rate could be between 67.7% and 98.3%).

The most common side effects in children aged 5 to 11 are similar to those in people aged 12 and above. They include pain at the injection site, tiredness, headache, redness and swelling at the site of injection, muscle pain and chills. These effects are usually mild or moderate and improve within a few days of vaccination. 

The CHMP therefore concluded that the benefits of Comirnaty in children aged 5 to 11 outweigh the risks.

I ain’t no statistician nor am I a doctor, but I noticed two things:

  • the sample size of 1,305 children with 3 vaccinated children getting the Chinese plague compared to 16 unvaccinated seems to me to be rather a small sample on which to base the decision to vaccinate millions of children
  • in the list of “most common side effects” there is no mention of heart muscle inflammation (myocarditis or pericarditis)

It looks to my untrained eye that the euro-elites had already decided to vaccinate children as a measure of coercion and social control rather than a measure of the population’s health and just did the minimum study possible to be able to keep a straight face when they claimed “the benefits of Comirnaty in children aged 5 to 11 outweigh the risks.”

The heart inflammation problem

And now for a real scientific study of millions of people, not just 1,305 children.

Heart inflammation requiring hospital care was more common among people who received COVID-19 vaccines than those who did not, according to a new study of tens of millions of Europeans.

Rates of myocarditis or pericarditis, two types of heart inflammation, are above the levels in an unvaccinated cohort, pegged at 38 per 100,000 after receipt of a second dose of a vaccine built on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology in males aged 16 to 24—the group studies have shown are most at risk of the post-vaccination condition—researchers with health agencies in Finland, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway found.

“These extra cases among men aged 16–24 correspond to a 5 times increased risk after Comirnaty and 15 times increased risk after Spikevax compared to unvaccinated,” Dr. Rickard Ljung, a professor and physician at the Swedish Medical Products Agency and one of the principal investigators of the study, told The Epoch Times in an email.

Comirnaty is the brand name for Pfizer’s vaccine while Spikevax is the brand name for Moderna’s jab.

Rates were also higher among the age group for those who received any dose of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, both of which utilize mRNA technology. And rates were elevated among vaccinated males of all ages after the first or second dose, except for the first dose of Moderna’s shot for those 40 or older, and females 12- to 15-years-old.

Researchers pulled data from national health registers, analyzing 23.1 million people aged 12 or older. The analysis was of data from Dec. 27, 2020, to incidence of myocarditis or pericarditis, or the end of the study time period, which was Oct. 5, 2021.

“The risks of myocarditis and pericarditis were highest within the first 7 days of being vaccinated, were increased for all combinations of mRNA vaccines, and were more pronounced after the second dose,” researchers wrote in the study, which was published by the Journal of the American Medical Association following peer review.

Moderna and Pfizer did not respond to requests for comment.

Some previous studies have indicated that the risk of heart inflammation is higher from the companies’ vaccines, or certain doses of the vaccines, than from COVID-19 itself.

So it seems that EU leaders, by denigrating the cheap, UK’s traditional AstraZeneca v*ccine and preferring the much more expensive, experimental mRNA v*ccines due to their fury at the UK daring to leave their beloved Big Brother state EUSSR, have probably wasted billions of EU taxpayers’ money and have condemned hundreds or even thousands of their own citizens to completely unnecessary serious heart problems and even death.

It would be amusing if it wasn’t so serious.

What about athletes?

And here’ a chart of young athletes collapses and deaths:

I wonder if these collapses and deaths might possibly have anything to do with the experimental, largely untested ‘miracle’ mRNA v*ccines?

5 comments to Is a sample size of 16 really a reliable basis for v*ccinating millions of children?

  • A Thorpe

    The big con trick being pulling is the use of relative risk, which is comparing the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. The efficacy is 1 – RR, which gives the high numbers being quoted. The Absolute Risk Reduction is relevant for an individual making a decision. I think it is the CDC that requires both to be given and this has been ignored in all the reported benefits. I don’t know about UK recommendations.

    There is also another issue with the data above and that is huge difference is the size of the two groups. It is something that trials aim to prevent but I don’t know if that is a concern, and it can be taken into account in the calculations.

    For the data above the ARR is 0.022 and from this the number required to be vaccinated for one to benefit can be calculated. The desired number is obviously 1. In this case it is over 4,500. I wonder how much parents were paid to put them in the trial. Remember John Le Care’s novel The Constant Gardener, apparently based on Pfizer payments to African mothers.

    I don’t know about statistical significance but in the initial Pfizer trial they had a total of 43,548 in the trial in two groups and only 170 were infected. There is no mention statistical significance in the report.

    The real concern about the adverse effects is that the manufacturers, health authorities, politicians and MSM are not in the least concerned.

  • Jeffrey Palmer

    A Thorpe – As in a military campaign, ‘adverse effects’ are just collateral damage nowadays, and merit no concern on the part of those responsible.
    Who have in any case already been indemnified by governments against the financial results of any civil actions for compensation.

  • Ed P

    Apart from the Chinese, who are continuing their subtle war on America by disrupting world trade, by pretending to have covid infections, the rest of the world seems to have moved on.
    But now the bug has weakened, people are becoming ill & dying, not from the bug but from the jabs. (Don’t believe this? Look at the vaxed vs. purebloods statistics for hospital admissions, serious problems & deaths – the majority are in the double & triple jabbed.)
    Perhaps it’s time for the next release of ‘jabby-death’? (That’s unless those pesky Ruskies have captured all the poisons prepared for the next round in the US(Ukrainian) labs.)

  • Brenda Blessed

    The presidents of Burundi, Swaziland/Eswatini, Tanzania, Ivory Coast and Haiti all opposed the main-stream narrative on Covid and all of them have died.

    All the same, there has been very low take-up of the vaccinations in Sub-Saharan Africa. Most of the people are poor and badly educated if educated at all, but they can obviously sense that a giant confidence trick is at work.

    Apparently, according to the Mark Steyn show on GB News, official UK government data shows that a third of UK people who qualify for vaccination have refused the offer, not the 5 millions figure that the media and government were using to demonise them. According to that data, the unvaccinated are much less likely to be hospitalised or die *with* Covid. Mark Steyn called being unvaccinated the rational choice.

    GB News recently showed, from a Freedom of Informations Request, that of the 150,000 deaths claimed for Covid, only 17,500 died of Covid alone. And how many of the 17,000 were the old people removed from hospitals and put back into care homes and treated with Midazolam.

    It could not be more obvious to me that the “vaccinations” are really an attempt to introduce a DNA-gene-editing capability into the world’s population that would give the globalist-controlled governments control of who lives, who dies and who gets to have children. If they can’t get it into us via vaccinations, they will no doubt develop alternative methods.

    GB News – Mark Steyn Thursday 21th April 2022 –

    Everyone in the UK – and the whole world – should watch Mark Steyn provide the statistics on the vaccinations that the UK government itself provides via the UK Health Security Agency, but which the mainstream media is ignoring completely.

  • A Thorpe

    This morning a saw a reference to the work of Prof Norman Fenton with a link to a Rumble video, but it is an hour of listening. He goes into a lot of detail about the analysis and problems with the data. He has also been “cancelled”. The Ministry of Truth is certainly working hard.

    Here is the link

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>