June 2021
« May    


(Tuesday to Thursday blog)

First my apologies to any regular readers. I had intended to start blogging again at the start of March. But first I stayed in Thailand a little longer than I had planned for reasons I won’t explain here. Then I got distracted by a new project.

We’ve seen how our rulers have used Xi Pingpong’s Chinese Wuhan Institute of Virology plague to lock us into our homes and take away our freedoms. As we slowly emerge from our prisons and survey the economic wreckage of what was once our economy and massive unrepayable debt, our rulers have new plans for us. They intend using the same coercive methods they used against Xi’s WuFlu to fight supposed CAGW (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Change).

So we can expect all kinds of (totally futile) new restrictions to be imposed on us over the next few years. There will be limitations and controls on:

  • what kind off cars we can buy
  • how we heat our homes
  • how many holidays we can take
  • how much meat we can eat
  • how we travel to work
  • how much energy we can use
  • and much much more.

Moreover, the social media companies will be asked to delete the accounts of anyone daring to question whether CAGW is actually real.

So I’ve reluctantly decided to write a new book probably titled something like “THERE IS  NO CLIMATE CRISIS”.

Unfortunately I have a degree in Modern Languages and an MBA and so know nothing at all about the science and fake science behind the claims of the CAGW believers. So, I’m going to spend a lot of time over the next 6 weeks doing research in the hope of starting to write the book at the beginning of May.

The reason I’ve chosen to write a book about a subject of which I know nothing is that I’ve been given permission to use a large amount of research done by a US climate expert who has dared to use forensic analysis to expose and ridicule the whole CAGW bandwagon of fake science and gullible, power-hungry politicians. I think it would be a tragedy if this research was not published in an easily-accessible form like a popular book

Why should you care? One thing I think you might find interesting is that I mentioned the book – “THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS” – to my literary agent and he advised me not to bother writing it. Why? Not because I’m a useless writer, though Shakespeare I ain’t. But because he didn’t believe that any UK or US publisher would have the courage to defy the rampaging Twitter mob by being involved in anything that blasphemed against the great new man-made global warming religious cult. However I’m going to go ahead anyway as, if I can’t find a publisher, I’ll just publish the book myself. Formatting and publishing the book will probably cost less than £1,000.

Then comes the next problem – finding someone to do PR for the book. When I collaborated with an education expert to write my last book – “THE GREAT UNIVERSITY CON” – several book PR companies refused to accept a contract to promote the book because they looked at my snouts-in-the-trough website and could see that I was an intolerant, racist, bigotted, Izlumophobic scumbag. Moreover, none of the mainstream media are likely to even mention a book that blows the fake science of supposed CAGW to pieces. I’m not yet sure how I’ll deal with that.

The bottom line is that I won’t have the time to write a regular blog till my book is written and published. But just to keep this website going, I’ll plan to write two blogs a week – on Mondays and Fridays.

On Friday this week, I’ll be writing a blog about “oikophobia”,

See you then.

10 comments to My next book – “THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS”

  • Daveh

    Mornin David,

    Will look forward to the book and good luck with it.
    Obviously i don’t know your US source, but I think it would be worth you approaching ( If you haven’t already ) Tony Heller of Real Climate …. His research is excellent, with facts.
    Good luck,


  • IanJ

    Put me down for a copy. Your previous books have shown what is really going on, and where the so-caled experts in their fields, who should konw better, are really fleecing us.

  • Loppoman

    You’re right.
    There is no “crisis”. Some prefer to call it an “emergency” where a solution is of utmost urgency.
    Good luck with the book.

  • Hardcastle

    Of course there isn’t a genuine climate crisis.Those of us old enough to have received a real education,particularly in the earth sciences saw this as a scam from the outset.Problem is,all the positions of power and influence have been infiltrated and all intelligent discussion has been closed down.This so called pandemic has been invented to enable the introduction of the build back better,new world order and all the things you rightly predict.A lot of people are going to be very shocked at the realities ahead and even then they will be in denial.People who have been conned find it very difficult to admit to it.

  • A Thorpe

    Good luck with the book, but I suspect your publisher is correct. There are numerous books on the subject and there is nothing new to be said, especially about the science. There are some detailed books about specific aspects such as the work on the hockey stick and other are more general and from the experts. There are also thousands of documents on the internet for anybody prepared to search for then. I have also read articles by people criticising climate science and they some also get the physics wrong. It would be nice to find a killer fact that Greta would accept but it is not possible.

    What concerns me more now, is not the science, but the obvious ignorance of a majority who do not know anything about the science and who readily believe lies. If you could research this, it would be something new in my view. Gad Saad published “The Parasitic Mind” recently and there are YouTube videos of him discussing his theory. He discusses an idea parasite that is infecting minds and preventing rational thought. It seems to me that the parasite has been around since the dawn of civilisation. You will have to understand why people believe nonsense to get the message through.

    Considering your interest in education, you might research what is going on in schools, colleges, and universities. How can incorrect physics be taught, or possibly correct physics but young people do not see the fraud? I believe schools are just brainwashing institutions promoting a climate crisis caused by humans. There is no attempt to present alternative views and have a discussion. Al Gore’s film is standard fodder in schools. It is full of glaring errors and schools are failing children by accepting his nonsense. It is hardly surprising when the TV glamour boy, Brian Cox, also promotes it. Joseph Postma runs the Climate of Sophistry website, and he had written two books. He has had papers rejected and is getting frustrated which you can see at the end of some of his recent video. His view seems to be to create a new university from scratch, but I don’t see how that will be achieved or why it would attract students who don’t agree with what it will teach.

    I recommend you look at YouTube for the Q&A appearance on Australian TV and also look for a YouTube video that discusses it by pointing out all the errors. The original show included Malcolm Roberts, who studied mining and he would know something about thermodynamics, but he was not capable of standing up to Brian Cox and I thought the audience had been selected to be Cox supporters, no matter what he said. This is what you are up against.

    I am also concerned about the various experiments I see on TV demonstrating that the greenhouse effect is real. None of them remotely resemble an experiment that in any way represents the climate system. All of them are an attempt the recreate the work of John Tyndall. You can find his work on the internet and drawings of the apparatus he used, which was a metal tube through which he passed radiation. He mistakenly thought radiation was trapped in the tube by gases, but it wasn’t. It was being absorbed and emitted and travelling in all directions, but he only measured one direction. Also, if he believed heat was trapped in the tube, the gases in it would increase in temperature, but no attempt was made to put a thermometer in the tube. This is a failing of all the modern interpretations, because they know it would not show any increase in temperature.

    The first person I saw doing a modern experiment was Iain Stewart and you can find this on YouTube if you research his name and candles. His experiment was faked by using a thermal imaging camera tuned to detect CO2. They are used to detect gas leaks in industrial plant. However, the experiment was developed at Sussex University and Jonathan Hare at the Creative Science Centre publish a note describing how it was done. I got it from the internet, and it might still be available. If you see this the glass tube is filled with CO2 from a cylinder and a compressed gas that expands will decrease in temperature but there is nothing to show that time was allowed for it to reach room temperature and it certainly would not be heated by a candle outside the tube.

    An Imperial College chemistry professor, Andrea Sella, did an experiment with gun cotton and a magnifying glass. I have not found this on the internet but is from another TV programme about weather. The 2020 Royal Institution Christmas lectures also showed another ridiculous experiment, and I would recommend finding these three lectures. There is also the famous two jar experiment done by Al Gore and many others. If you can work out why they do not demonstrate what they claim and present the fraud in your book, it would be something new I think.

    If you could get the book into schools and start a discussion, which is where it should be taking place, then you will achieve something. But it will be banned. That is the state of teaching today.

    If you want to contact me directly, I could supply some of the information I have discussed.

    Good Luck.

  • Brenda Blessed

    The best of luck to you, mate. – Because our ever so high-minded “liberal” lot are going to use “climate change” and the “Global compact for migration” that the UK has signed to bring in migrants in the millions from all of the best places on earth, made that way by the quality of their people. The US did not sign up to it under Trump, but no doubt will under Xiden. The idea, of course, being to get the Cancel Culture that is already going to get going on steroids.

    With this “liberal” load of sociopaths, there are always ostensibly virtuous reasons put forth for everything they do that hide the real diabolical reasons.

    Global compact for migration

    “The global compact comprises 23 objectives for better managing migration at local, national, regional and global levels. The compact:

    aims to mitigate the adverse drivers and structural factors that hinder people from building and maintaining sustainable livelihoods in their countries of origin;

    intends to reduce the risks and vulnerabilities migrants face at different stages of migration by respecting, protecting and fulfilling their human rights and providing them with care and assistance;

    seeks to address the legitimate concerns of states and communities, while recognizing that societies are undergoing demographic, economic, social and environmental changes at different scales that may have implications for and result from migration;

    strives to create conducive conditions that enable all migrants to enrich our societies through their human, economic and social capacities, and thus facilitate their contributions to sustainable development at the local, national, regional and global levels.”

    Ain’t that cute? – Nothing mentioned about the effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that is going to make most people redundant.

  • William Boreham

    That gullible buffoon, Johnson, and his ‘green’ energy policies will bring the highest energy costs in Europe and economic suicide. What is the point of having a huge Conservative majority in Parliament if they sit back and watch the country go down the drain
    Perhaps we should kick them all out and put the Conservative women in charge!

    A few ‘climate’ sites to be getting on with:

  • Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), Nobel-Prize-winning novelist, historian and critic of Communist totalitarianism:

    “You must understand. The leading Bolsheviks who took over Russia were not Russians. They hated Russians. They hated Christians. Driven by ethnic hatred they tortured and slaughtered millions of Russians without a shred of human remorse. The October Revolution was not what you call in America the “Russian Revolution.” It was an invasion and conquest over the Russian people. More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their bloodstained hands than any people or nation ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be understated. Bolshevism was the greatest human slaughter of all time. The fact that most of the world is ignorant of this reality is proof that the global media itself is in the hands of the perpetrators.”

    [The perpetrators – Look up the ethnic makeup of the Bolsheviks.]

    “And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?”

    — Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn , The Gulag Archipelago 1918–1956

  • Ern

    A Great idea David. Keep the flag flying, we shall support you – quality if not exactly quantity. The sheep are becoming restless, the signs are see-able for anyone who is interesed.

    Best wishes to you and yours.

  • Dennis Roy Hartwell

    I will certainly be buying a copy, fear not ! For a while I was taken in by the ‘Anthropogenic Global Warming’ scam until they started the settled science and consensus narrative. I spent 43 years in (biological) sciences and settled science and consensus wouldn’t have got past any of the scientists I knew. In fact, to voice such opinions would have a) brought down ridicule on me b) probably have blighted my career. I immediately realised this was political/quasi-religious and did more delving which proved to me it was a total scam ! Keep up the good work. Since we lost Christopher Booker there has been no-one to champion this assault on civilisation.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>