February 2024
« Jan    

“Self-inflicted” – the adjective the mainstream media never use

(Monday/Tuesday/Wednesday blog)

I want you to imagine the population of the UK doubling every 20 years. Officially there are just over 66 million people living in the UK. But if you include all the unregistered illegal immigrants, the real figure is probably comfortably over 70 million. However, for the purposes of this exercise, let’s accept the official 66 million figure.

So, if the UK population doubled every 20 years we’d have about 132 million people by 2040 and around 264 million by 2060. It should be more than blindingly obvious to anyone except a progressive, liberal, rapefugee-hugging moron that such population growth would be utterly disastrous. There would be mass unemployment, widespread poverty, most people would be living in overcrowded slums and there would be constant civil war as different ethnic groups fought over limited resources of food, water and space, while the rich would retreat into well-guarded, fortress-like compounds. Britain with 264 million people (or even 132 million) would be a dystopia that would make Soylent Green look like girl guides’ picnic.

Fortunately, Britain’s population is not doubling every 20 years. But the population of Crapistan is;

In fact, the population of practically every Asian and African sh*thole is doubling every 20 or so years:

When writing about poverty and famine and floods and earthquakes and suchlike, the one word the media never use is “self-inflicted”. Africa is NOT poor. Africa is one of the richest continents in the world. Africa has massive resources of land, water and minerals. But most Africans live in abject poverty. Why? Because there are too many of them and because their populations are growing much faster than their economies.

“Help” scream Oxfam and Save the Children and Unicef’s well-paid bosses and kiddy-fiddling staff, “give us more money to help the poor Africans”. After World War II under the Marshall Plan, Europe received about $20 billion (in today’s money) over 5 years to aid rebuilding. Since massive aid started flowing into Africa in the mid 1960s, Africa has received about $20 billion (in today’s money) every 5 years – equivalent to ten Marshall Plans. The result – more Africans live in excremental cesspit poverty than they did before the huge flows of foreign aid started.

What about famines?

“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about famines? We need to help people affected by famines“. Rubbish. For example, there is a lack of rainfall in the Horn of Africa every 7 to 10 years. This is completely predictable and could be planned for. But it could only be planned for if Ethiopia and Somalia and Sudan etc had growing economies that could support their people. But all these sh*tholes have are rapidly growing populations that no reasonable amount of foreign aid can ever adequately feed, clothe and house. As I keep repeating, in 1964 or whenever it was that Saint Bob did his BandAid thingy, there were about 40 million Ethiopians, now there are about 100 million. And by 2040 there will be about 200 million. How are you going to find jobs, homes and food for all of those people?

What about floods?

“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about floods? We need to help people affected by floods”. Rubbish. The main reason there are often devastating floods in the usual Third-World sh*tholes is due to excessive population growth. This leads to deforestation so that, when the rains do come, they are not absorbed into the ground through the trees but instead turn into deadly torrents causing landslides and loss of life. When it was thought London might be flooded, the Thames Barrier was built between 1974 and 1984. Most floods can be avoided if a country has the resources and money.

What about civil war?

“Ah” the bleeding heart liberals protest “but what about civil war? We need to help people affected by civil wars”. Rubbish. Most civil wars start when there are too many people fighting over too few resources – land, food, water etc. If there were fewer people and thus more resources available for each person, probably most civil wars wouldn’t happen.

It’s population control we need, not aid!

As long as sh*thole countries double their populations every 20 or so years we will have misery, poverty, war and other disasters. This misery is mostly self-inflicted! But this is something the useless, biased, ever so progressive mainstream media will never admit.

In the last 30 years, with their one-child policy, the Chinese have managed to take over 600 million people out of poverty. In the last 30 years, due to their explosive population growth, our friends in Africa have managed to push another 600 million people into poverty

We need to stop giving foreign aid and charity to these countries with rapidly-growing populations. All we’re doing is encouraging yet more unsustainable population growth. Instead we need to set conditions on all foreign aid and charity money – that only countries with active birth control programmes will receive our help.

But we can’t do this as we would be accused of “neo-colonialism” and “neo-imperialism” and, of course, the old favourite “racism”.

So, we can’t stop Africa’s and all the Sh*tistans’ population explosion. In fact, through foreign aid and charities, we’re actually encouraging it. And when their failed sh*thole countries inevitably collapse, millions of these people will flood into Europe, overwhelm us and destroy what’s left of our civilisation:

6 comments to “Self-inflicted” – the adjective the mainstream media never use

  • NoMore

    Possibly the best and most important article you have ever written. It deserves a far, far wider audience. I particularly liked the thought experiment with the UK population undergoing similar growth – that really brings it home (if you’ll pardon the pun.)

    These countries with the exponential population growth have been granted rights to modern medicine and technology they have not earned themselves, but have not accepted that with these rights come responsibilities to properly manage their populations.

    The leaders if they grew and spread the wealth would give the populace a chance to save for their old age so they are not totally reliant on children. But the people themselves should adapt to improving mortality rates and realise they don’t need ten kids any more as most will make it through to adulthood now. As for the !slamic countries well there is also the factor of being told irresponsibly to breed for A!!ah and treat women as baby factories.

  • William Boreham

    And of course, in total contrast, white Europeans have stopped having babies. I see only today in the Mail, “Why is it so tough to admit you don’t want a baby? Cosmopolitan editor FARRAH STORR reveals she decided to turn her back on motherhood.” Not one European nation has a fertility rate – 2.1 children per woman-sufficient to keep it alive. Between now and 2050, indigenous Europe will LOSE 40 million people. Much of what we loosely call the civilised Western World will not survive this century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our children’s lifetimes, including many if not most Western European countries. I recall reading the UN’s “World Population 2015 Chart. Consider but a few of those figures: Far from dying off due to disease, war and starvation, between now and 2050, Africa will add 1.3 billion people, to reach 2.4 billion in 2050. Then its population will double again, to 4.4 billion, by 2100! Only 5 percent of Africans are 60 or older, while 41 percent of Africans are 15 or younger. Unfortunately for us, as a result, combined with total inability to produce modern, advanced societies – Africa and parts of the Near East are beginning to fail as even semi functioning states. They are failing under the pressure of populations that have multiplied by 10 to 20 times since I was born. Climate for growing food is deteriorating at an accelerating rate; degraded soils; insufficient unpolluted water; bad governance; and lack of infrastructure. Consider Nigeria as an example: It had 19 million people when I was born and now has 187 million. In a recent poll, 40% of Nigerians (75 million) said they would like to emigrate, mostly to the UK (population 66 million). But the official UN estimate for Nigeria’s population in 2100 is over 800 million! (They still have a fertility rate of six children per woman.)
    But apart from African countries, what the UN statistics tell us is that (as of now) the future belongs to Islam. The Arab-Muslim population of North Africa alone, from the western Sahara and Morocco to Egypt and Sudan, will add 130 million people in 35 years. Egypt will add 60 million, to reach a population of 151 million by 2050. Yet Egypt will still have only the fifth-highest population of Muslims, behind Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh and India.

  • RealityBeckons...

    Can you imagine 10 Million British Christians heading to Pakistan and asking for unlimited welfare and healthcare and 1000s of churches to be built in Islamabad .Then getting them to criminalize any criticism .LOL…
    No neither can I only shit hole UK would do the reverse and ask for more, up yours Libtartds..

    Persecution of Christians in Pakistan..
    Farooqabad gang rape: 14 year old Christian minor left in critical condition after sexual assault.

    Kharian: Police unleashes third degree torture on Christians.

    Teacher incited anti-Christian hostility says father of Sharoon Masih

    You wont see that reported at the Scum BBC..

  • Stillreading

    It is evident to anyone who looks at the population figures and is aware of what is going on in the Middle East, North Africa and Pakistan that Islam is aiming for total world dominance – and in the absence of any effective action from the West, will get it eventually. Moderate, Westernised Muslims will have no alternative but to side with the invading majority or be slaughtered. It’s merely a matter of time. Islam is of far greater danger than Soviet Communism ever was, not least for the reason that Western leaders appear either not to be aware of it, or are terrified of implementing the measures necessary to halt its advance. Of course, once Islam has gained dominance, the entire world, including the West, will rapidly revert to pre-Medieval conditions. It’s a bleak prospect indeed for those of us who have grandchildren just on the brink of adulthood, establishing careers, forming relationships, intending to have children of their own in years to come. Appallingly, these dear grandchildren are so steeped in Leftie Libtard ideology that they can’t acknowledge the danger ahead. I’m glad I shan’t be alive to witness their probable fate.

  • DoneLikeDinner

    Plagued by another run of bank bailouts and simmering tensions between the partners in its ruling coalition, Italy’s brief reprieve following the detente between its populist rulers and angry bureaucrats in Brussels is already beginning to fade. As Bloomberg reminded us on Monday, Italy’s $1.7 trillion pile of public debt – the third largest sovereign debt pool in Europe – is threatening to set off a chain reaction that could hammer banks from Rome, to Madrid, to Frankfurt – and beyond.

  • Pete Eldridge

    I.Q. I have in my possession a book of facts(Q&A) written in ~1939. The low I.Q. of third-world countries is a known fact in 1939 but has since been brushed under the carpet.
    Charity. When at school in the 1950’s, we were told that our ‘help’ had doubled life expectancy in India over 5 years with a resulting population boom because their children were their old-age pension.

    Despite knowing these facts then we have continued to propogate the oncoming disaster. All in the name of humanity, stupid? or just business?

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>