October 2017
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Hey cousin! Let’s marry and produce dead babies or morons!

One London borough has just found (to their astonishment) that more than 20% of infant deaths between 2008 and 2016 were due to the parents being closely related.

A never-spoken-about problem with our ‘Asian’ friends is their inbreeding as a result of their long and deeply-ingrained practice of marrying first cousins — a practice that has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses.

In 2005, Labour MP Anne Cryer called for first-cousin marriages to be banned. Then in 2008, the UK’s environment minister Phil Woolas again sounded the alarm about this “very sensitive” issue that is “rarely debated”. Referring to the culture of arranged marriages between cousins in the ‘Asian’ immigrant community, Woolas said: “If you have a child with your cousin the likelihood is there’ll be a genetic problem.

Woolas, whose views are supported by medical experts, said most cases occur in immigrant families from rural Pakistan, where up to half of all marriages involve first cousins. Woolas said: “If you talk to any primary care worker they will tell you that levels of disability among the . . . Pakistani population are higher than the general population. And everybody knows it’s caused by first cousin marriage.

first cousin marriages 2

The problem is made worse by generational inbreeding. As Woolas put it, “Many of the parents themselves and many of the public spokespeople are themselves products of first cousin marriages”. That would explain why research for BBC2’s Newsnight in November 2005 showed that British Pakistanis accounted for just 3.4% of all births but 30% of all ‘British’ children with recessive genetic disorders.

But the problem isn’t exclusive to our Pakladeshi neighbours as Woolas seems to imply, but is pandemic among Religion of Peaceniks across the world.

According to Nicolai Sennels. a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into Religion of Enlightenment inbreeding, close to half of all the religion’s followers in the world are inbred:

  • 70% of Pakistanis are inbred.
  • 67% of Saudi Arabians are inbred.
  • 64% of those living in Jordan and Kuwait are inbred.
  • 63% of Sudanese are inbred.
  • 60% of Iraqis are inbred.
  • 54% of M*sl*ms in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar are inbred.
  • 25-30% of those in Turkey are inbred.
  • In England, at least 55% of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins.
  • In Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.

Sennels points out that cousin marriage was sanctioned by the Prophet and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Religion of Inbreeding. This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Religion of Inbreeding world since the Prophet, blessed be His name and from Whom all wisdom comes, is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage. To our Religion of Love friends, any scientific research conducted in the last 1,400 years is irrelevant if it contradicts the teachings of their wonderful book.

Sennels warns that massive inbreeding in M*sl*m culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the M*sl*m gene pool, including extensive damage to M*sl*ms’ intelligence, sanity, and health. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)

But perhaps the dead babies were the lucky ones? Below are the consequences of inbreeding in addition to dead babies:

  1. Birth and birth defects:
  • 100% increase in the risk of stillbirths.
  • 50% increase in the risk that the child dies during labor.
  • The risk of autosomal recessive genetic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher.
  • The risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher.
  1. Physical and mental retardation and illnesses:
  • The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of mental and physical retardation and schizophrenic illness.
  • The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness, i.e., insanity.
  • Social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. An academic paper published in the Indian National Science Academy found that “the onset of various social profiles like visual fixation, social smile, sound seizures, oral expression and hand-grasping are significantly delayed among the new-born inbred babies.”
  • Research shows that if one’s parents are cousins, intelligence goes down 10-16 IQ points. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by 400% among children of cousin marriages.

All of which would explain the following phenomena:

  • 1 out of every 3 Somalis are mentally ill.
  • More than 40% of the patients in Denmark‘s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant (i.e., M*sl*m) background.
  • One-third of all handicapped people in Copenhagen have a “foreign” (i.e., M*sl*m) background.
  • In Denmark, psychologist Sennels’ native country, “non-Western” immigrants (who are mainly M*sl*m) are more than 300% more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
  • In Denmark, M*sl*m children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education.
  • 64% of school children with Arabic parents in Denmark are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
  • The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of M*sl*ms in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.

The possible average lower IQ of our friends from the One and Only True Religion could mean a lowered ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking, which would explain why:

  • The Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone did before the economic crash of 2007/8. In the last 1,200 years of *sl*m, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain used to do in a single year.
  • 7 out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
  • Only 9 members of the Religion of Peace have ever won the Nobel Prize, and 5 of those 9 were, of course, for the “Peace Prize”.
  • According to Naturemagazine, Religion of Tolerance and Harmony countries produce just 10% of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).

Sennels concludes: “The troubling reality being referred to is the widespread practice of M*sl*m inbreeding and the birth defects and social ills that it spawns.

The tragic effect of the Left’s control of the boundaries of debate is that any discussion about vital issues such as these marks an individual as an “*sl*mophobe” and a “racist.”

A person who dares to point at the pathology of inbreeding in the M*sl*m community is accused of whipping up hatred against M*sl*m people.

But all of this could not be further from the truth. To fight against inbreeding anywhere is to defend humanity and to defend innocent babies from birth defects….

Let us keep in mind that M*sl*ms are the first — though maybe not the biggest — victims of *sl*m….

In fact, it is the Left’s callous silence on this issue (and on so many others) that exposes who is truly “anti-M*sl*m”.

Usually our useless, expenses-fiddling MPs are keen to get to get their faces and opinions on TV and in the press. But curiously, when Anna Cryer (2005) and Phil Woolas (2008) mentioned the problem of first-cousin marriages among a certain group in our society, all our other MPs suddenly became invisible.

As for the useless NHS, which is always issuing instructions to us proles on how to live (less alcohol, more exercise, less junk food etc), when asked about the problem of first-cousin marriages, the NHS refused to comment saying only that this was “a matter for local communities”.

8 comments to Hey cousin! Let’s marry and produce dead babies or morons!

  • NoMore

    Something else for the UKIP manifesto.

  • william boreham

    From an e-mail I got today:

    Biological fallout from 50 generations of first cousin marriages
    from a Lockheed employee in Saudi Arabia.
    During the pilot transition program with the KV-107 and C-130 with Lockheed, we found that most Saudi pilot trainees had very limited night vision, even on the brightest of moonlit nights.
    Their training retention rate was minimal including maintenance personnel. Some had dim memories and had to be constantly reminded of things that were told to them the day before. An American, British or any other western instructor is burned out pretty quick. It actually took Muslim C-130 pilots years before they could fly in the dark safely and then would be reluctant to leave the lights of a city.
    Ask any Marine, Air Force or Army guy who’s been trying to train Iraqis, and especially Afghans. Islam is not only a religion; it’s a barbaric way of life dating from the 7th Century all the way around. Here’s yet another set of revealing facts about Muslim beliefs and traditions and ways of life. 1400 years of inbreeding.
    Nikolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first cousins. This practice, which has been prohibited in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
    This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
    The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
    The numbers are equally devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
    According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
    The risks of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher, and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
    Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as “retarded,” increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time.)
    In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. Sennels says, “The ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world.” He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
    In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book. Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. “A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.”
    Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the “Peace Prize.” According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research measured by articles per million inhabitants.
    In Denmark, Sennels’ native country, Muslim children are grossly over represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of schoolchildren with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant dropout rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
    Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of insanity may explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark’s biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background. The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, “One study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.”
    Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. 
    Because Muslims’ religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. This has produced overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
    Bottom line: Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims.
    Simple Judeo-Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous ideology.

    From my files:
    Also from the Danish psychologist Nicolai Sennels who has studied the ideology of Islam and how it affects Muslims. 
    He has concluded it creates monsters/psychopaths

    Here he writes:
    How Islam Creates Sociopaths
    Psychopathic people and behaviour are found within all cultures and religions. But one tops them all — by many lengths.
    The daily mass killings, terror, persecutions and family executions committed by the followers of Islam are nauseating, and the ingenuity behind the attacks — always looking for new and more effective ways of killing and terrorizing people — is astonishing: hijacking jumbo jets and flying them into skyscrapers, hunting unarmed and innocent people with grenades and automatic rifles in shopping malls, planting bombs in one’s own body, using model airplanes as drones, attaching large rotating blades to pickup trucks and using them as human lawn movers, killing family members with acid or fire, hanging people publicly from cranes in front of cheering crowds, etc.
    It makes one ask oneself: what creates such lack of empathy and almost playful and creative attitude towards murdering perceived enemies?
    This is a question for psychologists like me.
    Studying the Muslim mind
    Nobody is born a mass murderer, a rapist or a violent criminal. So what is it in the Muslim culture that influence their children in a way that make so relatively many Muslims harm other people?
    As a psychologist in a Danish youth prison, I had a unique chance to study the mentality of Muslims. 
    70 percent of youth offenders in Denmark have a Muslim background. 
    I was able to compare them with non-Muslim clients from the same age group with more or less the same social background. 
    I came to the conclusion that Islam and Muslim culture have certain psychological mechanisms that harm people’s development and increase criminal behaviour.
    One can understand a Muslim parent’s concern about his offspring’s religious choices, because the Sharia orders the death penalty for their children should they pick another religion than their parents. 
    The other group of mechanisms are more cultural and psychological. These cultural psychological mechanisms are a natural consequence of being influenced by a religion like Islam and stemming from a 1,400 year old tribal society with very limited freedom to develop beyond what the religion allows.
    During numerous sessions with more than a hundred Muslim clients, I found that violence and repetition of religious messages are prevalent in Muslim families.
    Muslim culture simply does not have the same degree of understanding of human development as in civilized societies, and physical pain and threats are therefore often the preferred tool to raise children. 
    This is why so many Muslim girls grow up to accept violence in their marriage, and why Muslim boys grow up to learn that violence is acceptable. 
    And it is the main reason why nine out of ten children removed from their parents by authorities in Copenhagen are from immigrant families. The Muslim tradition of using pain and intimidation as part of disciplining children are also widely used in Muslim schools — also in the West.
    Combined with countless repetitions of Quranic verses in Islamic schools and families, all this makes it very difficult for children to defend themselves against being indoctrinated to follow the Quran, even if it is against secular laws, logic, and the most basic understanding of compassion.
    And as we know from so many psychological studies, whatever a child is strongly influenced by at that age takes an enormous personal effort to change later in life. 
    It is no wonder that Muslims in general, in spite of Islam’s inhumane nature and obvious inability to equip its followers with humor, compassion and other attractive qualities, are stronger in their faith than any other religious group.
    In Western societies, the ability to handle criticism constructively if it is justified, and with a shrug if it is misguided, is seen as an expression of self-confidence and authenticity.
    As everyone has noticed, this is not the case among Muslims. 
    Here criticism, no matter how true, is seen as an attack on one’s honour, and it is expected that the honour is restored by using whatever means necessary to silence the opponent. 
    Muslims almost never attempt to counter criticism with logical arguments; instead, they try to silence the criticism by pretending to be offended or by name-calling, or by threatening or even killing the messenger.
    Everything happens “insha’ Allah” — if Allah wills — and the many religious laws, traditions and powerful male authorities leave little room for individual responsibility. 
    This is the cause for the embarrassing and world-famous Muslim victim mentality, where everybody else is blamed and to be punished for the Muslims’ own self-created situation.
    Finally, the fourth psychological factor making Muslims vulnerable to the violent message in the Quran concerns tolerance. 
    While Western societies in general define a good person as being open and tolerant, Muslims are told that they are superior to non-Muslims, destined to dominate non-Muslims, and that they must distance themselves socially and emotionally from non-Muslims. 
    The many hateful and dehumanizing verses in the Quran and the Hadiths against non-Muslims closely resemble the psychological propaganda that leaders use against their own people in order to prepare them mentally for fighting and killing the enemy. 
    Killing another person is easier if you hate him and do not perceive him as fully human.
    The cultural and psychological cocktail of anger, low self-esteem, victim mentality, a willingness to be blindly guided by outer authorities, and an aggressive and discriminatory view toward non-Muslims, forced upon Muslims through pain, intimidation and mind-numbing repetitions of the Quran’s almost countless verses promoting hate and violence against non-Muslims, is the reason why Islam creates monsters.
    The problem with Islam and Muslim culture is that there are so many psychological factors pushing its followers towards a violent attitude against non-Muslims that a general violent clash is — at least from a psychological perspective — inevitable. 
    With such strong pressure and such strong emotions within such a large group of people — all pitched against us — we are facing the perfect storm, and I see no possibilities of turning it around. 
    For people to change, they have to want it, to be allowed to change, and to be able to change — and only a tiny minority of Muslims have such lucky conditions.
    As we have already seen, no army of social workers, generous welfare states, sweet-talking politicians, politically correct journalists or democracy-promoting soldiers can stop these enormous forces. 
    Sensible laws on immigration and Islamization in our own countries can limit the amount of suffering, but based on my education and professional experience as a psychologist for Muslims, I estimate that we will not be able to deflect or avoid this many-sided, aggressive movement against our culture.

  • Gloria from Victoria

    A future civilisation will debate and ponder how we early 21st century inhabitants could have been so stupid as not to have seen the obvious coming destruction.

  • NoIfsNoButs

    Conservative and Labour Election Manifestos very similar to this from 1923..

    1. The creation of racism offences.
    2. Continual change to create confusion
    3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
    4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
    5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
    6. The promotion of excessive drinking
    7. Emptying of churches
    8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
    9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
    10. Control and dumbing down of media
    11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

    The Frankfurt School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. ‘Modern forms of subjection are marked by mildness’. They saw it as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

    http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2216734/posts

    Cultural Marxism has destroyed our society, Teresa May will ram it down our throats. We dont live in a Democracy, you are presented with a Leader that lies and then continues to undermine and destroy our Society. Teresa May just attacked the Pensioners again, seizing their Winter Fuel Payments.We all know who is draining the pot but that will never be mentioned.White man and Pensioners LAST as per The Cultural Marxist Tories and Labour.Turn everything upside down, confuse and destroy, what was right is wrong and visa versa.It doesnt look good Comrades, corrosion and corruption from within, slowly dying.I didnt see Teresa May stand up for Sgt Blackman, no he served 7 years for fighting for his country as directed by the War Monger Politicians.

  • Mufty

    ‘All women’ could be asked to wear headscarves in ‘solidarity’ with Muslims – Austrian president .

    “However, referring to discrimination against Muslims in Austria, the leader went on to state that “if this continues… with the widely spreading Islamophobia, the day will come when we have to ask all women to wear a headscarf – all – out of solidarity to those who do it for religious reasons.”

    https://www.rt.com/news/386378-austrian-president-women-headscarves/

    There’s an awful lot of Political Morons about too.

  • Mufty

    That Religion of Peace again..

    Muslims living in Luton in the United Kingdom were told during Ramadan last year that it was their Islamic “duty” to throw homosexuals from a “high building,”

  • Tony Solihull

    Tories Pledge to keep Immigrants Pouring in to the UK.The UK’s identity Culture and people must be removed at all costs.Resistance is futile and You will foot the Bill..

    “Tory Plege To Reform Refugee System May Change Nature, But Not Number of Arrivals.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/05/19/tories-pledge-to-reform-refugee-definition-favouring-young-with-resources-to-get-to-britain/

  • Michael Moore

    Uk Tranny friendly Police, they will all be wearing skirts next.

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/10/british-police-don-non-binary-hats-to-recruit-transgenders/

    Austrian Town Won’t Accept Any More Refugees After Girl Is Raped
    Jacob Bojesson

    http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/20/austrian-town-wont-accept-any-more-refugees-after-girl-is-raped/

    Maybe if they were all Castrated women and children would then be safer.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>