August 2022
« Jul    

Fritz’s retirement plan vs M*h*mmed’s retirement plan

(Weekend blog. Here’s a perceptive article written by somebody much more intelligent than me. Enjoy!)

European leaders talk about two things these days; preserving European values by taking in M*sl*m migrants and integrating M*sl*m migrants into Europe by getting them to adopt European values.

It does not occur to them that their plan to save European values depends on killing European values.

The same European values that require Sweden, a country of less than 10 million, to take in 180,000 M*sl*m migrants in one year also expects the new “Swedes” to celebrate tolerance, feminism and gay marriage. Instead European values have filled the cities of Europe with Shariah patrols, unemployed angry men waving ISIS flags and the occasional public act of terror.

European countries that refuse to invest money in border security instead find themselves forced to invest money into counterterrorism forces. And those are bad for European values too.

But, as Central European countries are discovering, European values don’t have much to do with the preservation of viable functioning European states. Instead they are about the sort of static Socialism that Bernie Sanders admires from abroad. But even a Socialist welfare state requires people to work for a living. Maine’s generous welfare policies began collapsing once Somali M*sl*ms swarmed in to take advantage of them. Denmark and the Dutch, among other of Bernie Sanders’ role models, have been sounding more like Reagan and less like Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren.

Two years ago, the Dutch King declared that, “The classic welfare state of the second half of the 20th century in these areas in particular brought forth arrangements that are unsustainable in their current form.” That same year, the Danish Finance Minister called for the “modernization of the welfare state.”

But the problem isn’t one of modernization, it’s medievalization.

27% of Moroccans and 21% of Turks in the Netherlands are unemployed. It’s 27% in Denmark for Iraqis. And even when employed, their average income is well below the European average.

Critics pointed out in the past that a multicultural America can’t afford the welfare states that European countries have. Now that those same countries are turning multicultural, they can’t afford them either.

Europe invested in the values of its welfare state. The M*sl*m world invested in large families. Europe expects the M*sl*m world to bail out its shrinking birth rate by working and paying into the system so that its aging population can retire. The M*sl*m migrants however expect Europe to subsidize their large families with its welfare state while they deal some drugs and chop off some heads on the side.

Once again, European values are in conflict with European survival.

The European values that require Europe to commit suicide are about ideology, not language, culture or nationhood. But the incoming migrants don’t share that ideology. They have their own *sl*mic values.

Why should 23-year-old M*h*mmed work for four decades so that Hans or Fritz across the way can retire at 61 and lie on a beach in Mallorca? The idea that M*h*mmed would ever want to do such a thing out of love for Europe was a silly fantasy that European governments fed their worried citizens.

M*h*mmed doesn’t share European values. Nor are they likely to take hold of him no matter how often the aging teachers, who hope he gets a job and subsidizes their retirement, try to drill them into his head. Europeans expect M*h*mmed to become a Swede or a German as if he were some child they had adopted from an exotic country and raised as their own, and work to subsidize their European values.

The M*sl*m migrants are meant to be the retirement plan for an aging Europe. They’re supposed to keep its ramshackle collection of economic policies, its welfare states and social programs rolling along.

But they’re more like a final solution.

M*h*mmed is Fritz’s retirement plan. But M*h*mmed has a very different type of plan. Fritz is counting on M*h*mmed to work while he relaxes. M*h*mmed relaxes and expects Fritz to work.  Fritz is not related to him and therefore M*h*mmed sees no reason why he should work to support him.

European social democracy reduces society to a giant insurance plan in which money is pooled together.  But insurance is forbidden in *sl*m which considers it to be gambling. European social democracy expects him to bail it out, but to M*h*mmed, European values are a crime against *sl*m.

M*h*mmed’s Imam will tell him to work off the books because paying into the system is gambling. However taking money out of the system is just Jizya; the money non-M*sl*ms are obligated to pay to M*sl*ms. Under *sl*mic law, it’s better for M*h*mmed to sell drugs than to pay taxes.

That’s why drug dealing and petty crime are such popular occupations for Salafis in Europe. It’s preferable to steal from infidels than to participate in the great gamble of the European welfare state.

M*h*mmed isn’t staking his future on the shaky pensions of European socialism. He invests in what social scientists call social capital. He plans his retirement by having a dozen kids. If this lifestyle is subsidized by infidel social services, so much the better. And when social services collapse, those of his kids who aren’t in prison or in ISIS will be there to look after him in his golden years.

As retirement plans go, it’s older and better than the European model.

M*h*mmed doesn’t worry much about the future. Even if he doesn’t make it past six kids, by the time he’s ready to retire the European country he’s living in will probably be an *sl*mic State. And he is confident that whatever its arrangements are, they will be better and more just than the infidel system.

Sweden will take in 180,000 migrants this year. Germany may take in 1.5 million. Most of them will be young men following the M*h*mmed retirement plan.

Europeans are being assured that the M*h*mmeds will balance out the demographic disparity of an aging population with too many retirees and too few younger workers. But instead the M*h*mmeds will put even more pressure on the younger workers who not only have to subsidize their elders, but millions of M*h*mmeds, their multiple brides and their fourteen-child *sl*mic retirement plans.

Retirement ages will go further up and social services for the elderly will be cut. The welfare state will collapse, but it will have to be kept running because the alternative will be major social unrest.

Among the triggers of the Arab Spring were rising wheat prices and cuts to food subsidies. Prices went up and governments fell as street riots turned into civil wars. Imagine a Sweden where 50 percent of the young male population is M*sl*m, mostly unemployed, turning into Syria when the economy collapses and the bill comes due. Imagine European M*sl*m street riots where the gangs have heavy artillery and each ghetto Caliph has his own Imams and Fatwas to back up his claims.

Europe is slowly killing itself in the name of European values. It’s trying to protect its economic setup by bankrupting it. European values have become a suicide pact. Its politicians deliver speeches explaining why European values require mass M*sl*m migration that make as little sense as a lunatic’s suicide note.

*sl*mic values are not compatible with European values. Not only free speech and religious freedom, but even the European welfare state is un-*sl*mic. M*sl*ms have a high birth rate because their approach to the future is fundamentally different than the European one. Europeans have chosen to have few children and many government agencies to take care of them. M*sl*ms choose to have many children and few government agencies. The European values so admired by American leftists have no future.

Europe is drinking rat poison to cure a cold. Instead of changing its values, it’s trying to maintain them by killing itself. The M*h*mmed retirement plan won’t save European Socialism. It will bury it.

15 comments to Fritz’s retirement plan vs M*h*mmed’s retirement plan

  • NoMore

    Very true – however the EU elites are playing some other game really. They don’t want “european” values any more than the invaders do – if they did why on Earth wouldn’t they be paying for unemployed Greek, Spaniards and Italians to learn German or Swedish and help them to work and settle in those countries. Why aren’t they offering massive tax incentives or benefits for indigenous families to have more indigenous children? Probably too late for the UK and Sweden now as the invaders will just take advantage of the latter. No they really want to change the populace as the current ones are too questioning and independent and wedded to the nation state and its history and culture. The invaders are just a weapon to accelerate the expansion and omnipotence of the EU and its banker/Big Corp backers.

  • Fred the Shred

    What more need be said:

    Muslim Refugee Warns: This Is the “Islamic Conquest of the West”
    He’s a Muslim refugee living in Europe. And he has a warning:

    Keep the Muslim “refugees” out of Europe.

    He’s Dr. Mudar Zahran, a Jordanian Palestinian academic and a leader of the Jordanian Opposition Coalition who is currently living in the United Kingdom, where he sought political asylum. Describing himself as an “orthodox Muslim,” he nonetheless says there’s a “genuine problem with Muslims in Europe” and calls the current wave of migrants entering the continent “the soft Islamic conquest of the West.”

    Dr. Zahran issued these and more dire warnings on a Thursday segment of The Glazov Gang (video below). Zahran’s basic message is that the West is being manipulated, fooled, and played for suckers by migrants who by and large are not what they appear.

  • Tony Potts

    Anjem Choudary, in His Own Words.

    “In the Quran it is not allowed for you to feel sorry for non-Muslims. I don’t feel sorry for him.” — Anjem Choudary.

    “Eventually the whole world will be governed by Shari’ah & Muslims will have authority over China Russia USA etc This is the promise of Allah.” — Anjem Choudary.

    “Under the Koran the sale of alcohol is prohibited and if one were to also drink alcohol, that would be 40 lashes.” — Anjem Choudary.

    “We [Muslims] take the Jizya, which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the kuffar [non-Muslim]. They give us the money. You work, give us the money, Allahu Akhbar. We take the money.” — Anjem Choudary.

    Al-Muhajiroun—founded by Choudary and the exiled preacher, Omar Bakri Mohammed—is said to have also played a major role in radicalizing Michael Adebolajo, who was found guilty of murdering (and attempting to decapitate) the British soldier Lee Rigby outside London’s Woolwich Barracks in May 2013.

    Choudary said Rigby would “burn in hellfire” as a non-Muslim, and also praised Adebolajo as a “martyr.” He said:

    “Allah said very clearly in the Koran ‘Don’t feel sorry for the non-Muslims.’

    “So as an adult non-Muslim, whether he is part of the Army or not part of the Army, if he dies in a state of disbelief then he is going to go to the hellfire.

    “That’s what I believe so I’m not going to feel sorry for non-Muslims.

    “We invite them to embrace the message of Islam. If they don’t, then obviously if they die like that they’re going to the hellfires.”

  • Tony Potts

    The True Cost of Europe’s Muslim “Enrichment”

    The United Nations, in 2000, advocated the “replacement” of Europe’s population by Muslim migrants.

    There seems to be an economic premise underlying this view: that importing the Muslim world en masse into Europe is mutually beneficial. For decades, the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe has been labelled “enrichment.” Shouting “Islamophobia” does not negate how it is virtually impossible to think of a country actually made richer by it.

    Even in a country with an established Islamic population such as Britain, Muslim unemployment languishes at 50% for men, and 75% for women.

    Those using an economic rationale to implement Europe’s demographic transformation fail to recognize the complexities of Islam: they ignore the fundamentalist revival that has been ongoing for over a century. One feature of this growing embrace of literalism is a belief — validated by scripture — that Muslims are entitled to idly profit from the productivity of infidels.

    The idea that with time, Islam’s religious tenets will somehow moderate and dissolve, merely by being lodged in Europe, is wishful thinking, especially in communities where Muslim migrants already outnumber indigenous Europeans.

    The “blind eye” turned towards polygamy in Britain, France, Belgium and Germany has ensured that some Muslim men have upwards of 20 children by multiple wives, almost always at state expense. This suggests that families with fundamentalist views are outbreeding their more moderate coreligionists.

    The word “refugee” is a legal term, one defined by several international treaties. These documents brought the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) into existence, and sustain the relevance of the United Nations agency responsible for refugees to this day.

    The contents of these treaties, however, sit oddly with how the UNHCR has comprehensively sought to hoodwink the European public about the predominant status of the demographic influx into their continent this year.

    None of these documents — the 1951 Refugee Convention; the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, or the EU’s own Dublin Regulations — grants the right of refugee status to those traversing several safe countries, and illegally crossing multiple borders, to shop for the best welfare state.

    Even a legitimate refugee from Syria now living, for example, in Turkey or Lebanon, loses his refugee status by paying a people-smuggler to travel to Europe. According to international law, that refugee then becomes an “asylum seeker.” Only when his asylum claim has been investigated and judged to be valid by a requisite domestic agency, is he once again a “refugee.”

    So far, the world’s media has dutifully followed the false narrative established by the UNHCR. Those concerned by an unchecked and unlimited flood of Muslims into Europe — concerns grimly validated by Friday’s jihadist atrocities in Paris — have mostly been accused of heartlessness towards alleged refugees.

    As recently announced by Baroness Caroline Cox, the “blind eye” turned towards polygamy in Britain — and in France, Belgium and Germany – has ensured that some Muslim men are having upwards of 20 children by multiple wives, almost always at the state’s expense. This is grim news indeed for integration: families with fundamentalist views are outbreeding their more moderate coreligionists.

    The large numbers of non-Syrians, who have exploited illegal passage to access Europe’s welfare states and live at the expense of the continent’s taxpayers, led one MEP to condemn the EU’s migrant relocation quotas. So far, the relocation quota plan is the only solution put forward to address the enormous numbers of migrants already in Europe. It is a measure, however, that effectively “contracts out” the continent’s immigration policy to people-smugglers.

    On September 22, the European Commission had been legally empowered to spread the rising number of migrants from Islamic countries throughout the continent. Members of European countries who objected were OVERRULED.

    Anjem Choudary (center), a prominent British Islamist, has urged his followers to quit their jobs and claim unemployment benefits so they could have time to plot holy war. “We [Muslims] take the Jizya, which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the kuffar [non-Muslim]. They give us the money. You work, give us the money, Allahu Akhbar. We take the money.”

  • Mike Roberts

    Europe’s Culture, Way Of Life And Pattern Of Existence Threatened By ‘Migrant Invasion’
    Category: Islam and Europe
    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán said yesterday that Europe’s ‘migrant invasion’ represents as unprecedented challenge that “could crush and bury under itself the form of existence we have known up to now.”

    Mr Orbán was addressing the opening ceremony of the World Science Forum (WSF), a four day international science policy conference being held this week in Budapest. He told delegates from over 100 countries “we are living in crazy, interesting times” but suggested Europe lacks sufficient strength, knowledge and means to continue the ordinary course of life. Instead, he said, the continent is undergoing a crisis of confidence that leaves it vulnerable to what he sees as a migrant invasion.

    Meanwhile while Victor Orban the only leader in Europe with is head on the right way round is being targetted for telling the truth.
    The European Parliament’s tax payer funded liberal group is hosting their annual congress in the Hungarian capital with the express intention of destabilising the democratically elected right-wing government. Belgian MEP Guy Verhofstadt said Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban is a “dictator” and “the problem of Europe” who deserves “sanction”.

    Other speakers – including the UK Liberal Democrat’s Catherine Bearder MEP – agreed with him at the meeting of the European Political Party for Liberal Democrat Values (ALDE) in Budapest.

    “It’s no coincidence that we are holding our annual congress in Budapest. Our presence is a clear ‘no’ to the illiberal state of Orban”, Mr. Verhofstadt explained in his speech on Friday afternoon. “This is why we are here. To say ‘no’”, confirmed Hungarian MP Gabor Fodor during a debate shortly after.

    “Why is [Mr. Orban] talking about family values, Christianity and the nation… and Hungarian culture?” asked Dutch MEP Sophie In ‘t Veld.

    The news will raise fresh questions about the use of European tax payer money to oppose democratically elected governments. The last similar example is when the EU apparatchiks and tax payer funded groups agitated against another Viktor – Former President Yanukovych – eventually leading to his topple in an EU-backed coup.

    Of course George Soros and his twisted cohorts are behind it.

    British Liberal Democrat and former MP Graham Watson chimed with the sentiment in his speech: “We know where Orban’s illiberal state will lead – back to the horrors of the past”,

    Well I have news for Graham Watson, what he advocates and forces upon WILL presage the return of the HORRORS of the past upon US. Has not the Horror of Paris meant anything to you.

  • Help

    Case against ‘Syrian refugees’ accused of gang raping teenage girl descends into chaos as they argue and wail in the dock
    Questions emerged regarding their identity and whether they should be treated as juveniles
    Two young men are accused of being among a group who took turns to rape an ‘extremely vulnerable’ 18-year-old girl
    Immigration officials have judge one of the defendants is actually from Egypt

  • david brown

    NO MORE -Is right. The people who are intentionally facilitating the Islamic invasion of Western Europe are the enemy. None of this happened by mistake of folly its part of a plan for evil . They will use the threat of Islamist terrorists to pass all sorts of laws which will be used against us.

  • Help

    A group masquerading as conservative but backed by left-wing foundations including billionaire George Soros’ Foundation to Promote Open Society (FPOS) has launched an online advertising campaign in defense of bringing Syrian refugees to the United States.

  • Tom Trent

    Multicultural NOT , Flight YES

    Let’s talk about the exodus of 600,000 whites from London
    It is not wrong to discuss the cultural changes that large-scale immigration can cause, such as ‘white flight’ from certain areas in London.

    Imagine if Glasgow disappeared. Not overnight and not physically, but imagine if everyone who lived there decided to leave, in the space of 10 years. Argyle Street, in the city centre – empty. Byres Road, next to the university – derelict. The Crow Road – abandoned (except, perhaps – if this were an exciting new BBC drama – for an old Iain Banks novel, rain-damaged pages flapping in a gutter, symbol of the great evacuation). All those tenements, riverside apartments, suburban villas, all lying vacant. You’d sort of notice, wouldn’t you? You’d expect people to talk about it, at least.
    If your geographic history differs from mine, and you’ve no mental image of Glasgow to play with, consider, instead, Sheffield, or Nottingham, or Belfast. All cities of about 600,000 people. Imagine if everyone who lived there upped and left.
    Not the opening scenes of a dystopic science fiction screenplay, but the unfictional, real London, whose white British population has declined by roughly the population of those cities in the 10 years between the last two census surveys. “White British” (as opposed to Eastern European) citizens now make up less than half of London’s population. This is a change of profound significance, by any historical benchmark.

    That the proportion of white people in the borough of Barking and Dagenham has dropped from four fifths to less than a half in a decade is nothing more than the natural desire of increasingly prosperous people to retire to the seaside. I’m paraphrasing Mr Easton a little, but that was more or less the suggestion in his commentary. It’s a rising tide of prosperity that first of all flushed the Eastenders from Bethnal Green to Dagenham, and it’s the inexorable rise in property values that leads their descendants to move from metropolitan Essex to that beautiful county’s coastline.
    “Leigh[-on-Sea],” said Mr Easton, “is a particular favourite.” After all: “Many residents from Barking and Dagenham will have taken the train along the Thames Estuary towards Southend on a work excursion – the old beano to the seaside.” And so everything is dandy?
    Fundamentally, none of this is strictly about “race”, but rather the cultural constructs we layer on to genetics. There are good and bad neighbours of every hue, of course. But the scale of white flight demands more than issuing congratulations to the second and third generation children of immigrants, who’ve done well in life and moved from Zone 2 to Zone 5 of the Central or Northern Underground lines. It’s also absurd to assume that the grandchildren of cockneys are moving still further out, just because their houses have increased in value.
    Take Bethnal Green. The people leaving Dagenham now are themselves displaced Eastenders. The borough they first left behind would be unrecognisable to their grandparents, with a mayor whose election was supported by an Islamist group with unpleasant (to put matters mildly) views.
    Hate crimes disfigure its streets: in an ironic reversal of one reason for the East End’s fame – that it was where indigenous, working-class Londoners faced down home-grown fascists – the streets of Bethnal Green and Whitechapel are now scenes of increasingly violent attacks on gay people. The BBC doesn’t talk about this, oddly, or wonder why the Eastenders’ movement is always away from their original homes:

  • Tom Trent

    Islam is a totalitarian political system, usually introduced into western countries through three phases. The first phase introduces Islam as “tolerant” and peaceful, intentionally deceiving westerners, using“taqqiya,” Qur’an- sanctioned deceit.

    The second phase uses “lawfare” to destroy a country from within using its own laws. And, by the time the third phase is implemented “no-go zones” and violence has increased astronomically.

    All phases of Islam incorporate and regulate religious, political, legal, and social norms, through judicial, militia, and/or military means under Shari’a law.

    Phase Two, known as “Defensive Jihad” or “Civilization Jihad,” occurs when an immigrant population reaches between 10 and 20 percent of the population. It also mirrors the time in Muhammad’s life when he formed alliances with groups outside of Mecca and began fighting non-believers who rejected Islam (22:39,40). His experiences are reflected in the shorter chapters of the Qur’an, located towards the back. These texts supersede earlier transcribed texts, according to the Islamic doctrine of abrogation.

    While Muslim immigrants become a majority in a neighborhood, city, or region they lay the groundwork to eliminate existing western laws. In America, to eliminate constitutionally protected rights– using the Constitution– to destroy it under the guise of “Shari’a compliance.”

    This is accomplished by de-legitimizing existing laws, redefining legal terms related to human rights, and silencing and punishing free speech through “lawfare,” via lawsuits and dissemination of false and/or misinformation.

    Lawfare is only one of many approaches being used to infiltrate and transform every area of society with Islamic ideology. Phase Two involves:

    Making financial and banking operations Shari’a compliant;
    Influencing political decisions related to local municipalities, cultural institutions, prominent landmarks, and educational and non-profit organizations;
    Creating “charities” in order to receive non-profit IRS status, tax credits, and grants—that would otherwise not be, in order to act as fronts and intermediaries for financial and ideological terrorist-connected organizations and;
    Establishing Jihad training camps in nearly half of America’s states under the pretense of a non-profit organization on private property.
    Phase Two clarifies a simple fact: Islam encompasses every area of life rooted in Shari’a—for the worse. Shari’a offers only two choices, which are completely antithetical to the American way of life: submit to Islam or be killed.

  • Fred the Shred

    Former Iraqi MP: Thousands Of Mosques Are Preparing Followers For ISIS All Over The World.

    NOVEMBER 17, 2015
    Ayad Jamal Al-Din is a Shiite cleric and a former member of the Iraqi parliament. He is a well known Iraqi intellectual who advocates for a secular state with religious freedom.

    He begun his career advocating for Shiite rights at age 16. He fled Iraq and lived in Syria and Iran. After the US invasion of Iraq, he was elected to the Iraqi parliament. He later resigned when he felt the Shiite dominated parliament was aligning with Iran and moving Iraq towards a Shiite religious state. He believes that the 2010 Iraqi elections are tainted by fraud committed by Shiite radicals. The new parliament launched a backlash against Sunni Arabs that helped lead to the rise of ISIS.

    Here he tells Al-Iraqiya TV that fiqh, or Islamic religious law, is more dangerous than nuclear weapons. He says that thousands of mosques all over the world are preparing their followers to join ISIS or similar groups.

  • Tony Potts

    Well who’da thunk it:

    As the hunt for jihadists widens after last week’s Paris attacks, authorities in Greece warn it was virtually impossible to pick out dangerous extremists among arriving migrants, without prior intelligence.

    “If they are not already registered in the database, it’s nearly impossible,” says Dimitris Amountzias, police captain in charge of Moria, Greece’s main registration camp on the island of Lesvos.

    At the camp, dozens of migrants and refugees queue to give their fingerprints, have a photo taken and be quizzed by agents from European border agency Frontex.

    It’s a seemingly detailed security check, but jihadists have already proven they can bypass it with ease.

  • Tony Potts

    Sign of the times: Public notice erected in South Lanarkshire town welcomes visitors but notes ISIS are ‘t***s’ and can ‘f*** off’
    The sign was erected on the outskirts of the tiny British town of Larkhall
    It states: ‘Welcome to Larkhall. Except ISIS. You t**** can f*** off’
    Photographs of the hilarious sign have gone viral across social media
    Larkhall is a town which has had to cope with its own religious problems .

  • Tony Potts

    Sign of the times: Public notice erected in South Lanarkshire town welcomes visitors but notes ISIS are ‘t***s’ and can ‘f*** off’
    The sign was erected on the outskirts of the tiny British town of Larkhall
    It states: ‘Welcome to Larkhall. Except ISIS. You t**** can f*** off’

  • Mike Rogers

    Sweden’s Fiscal Watchdog Lambastes Government Financing Plan.

    Sweden seems intent upon accelerating the timing of its own demise and collapse.

    Sweden’s fiscal watchdog warned that plans by Finance Minister Magdalena Andersson to abandon the country’s krona-for-krona budget principle risk driving up debt.
    The Social Democrat-led minority government has for some time been discussing whether to relax the country’s strict fiscal rules in a bid to push unemployment down to the lowest levels in the European Union by 2020. One idea is to aim for balanced budgets rather than stick with the current target of a 1 percent surplus over a business cycle.
    Scandinavia’s biggest economy is now struggling to deal with the costs of an unprecedented wave of asylum seekers from Syria and the Middle East, making the fiscal debate even more topical.
    “Even if the surplus target was changed to a balanced budget target, there’d be a need to keep krona-for-krona,” John Hassler, the chairman of the Swedish Fiscal Policy Council, said in a telephone interview on Monday. Otherwise there’s “an obvious risk that Sweden’s debt starts growing again.”
    You see some politicians here in the UK and across Western Europe will destroy our countries for the sake of so called Refugees helping the Worlds needy is paramount to our own safety and survival.

    As Mrs Thatcher said( a politican that was a Giant compared to the Dross of today)

    “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money [to spend].”

    Now the tricky of the AngloAmerican financial domination is rapidly coming to an end. The meddling and mess of the Middle East has all been about maintaining the Petro Dollar , Americas only claim left to Super Power status, we have all witnessed the fallout from that,that will accelerate from this point on.

    Right now, the US Dollar makes up 2/3rds of the worlds global reserve currency. This is because nearly every oil-exporting country in the world exclusively sells their oil in dollars, so nations are forced to hoard large amounts of the dollar.
    There are two countries that don’t sell their oil in the dollar: Syria, and Iran.

    If these two countries joined forces, got Venezuela on their side, maybe a few other countries, and then made an economic treaty with the BRICS nations, an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, to buy their oil in a currency other than the US dollar, the economy would collapse

    All countries in the world would send their massive hoards of the dollar back to the Fed in exchange for whichever currency replaces it. The value of the dollar would shrink dramatically and the Fed would be forced to take steps to shrink the money supply to stem massive inflation. The raising of the Federal Funds rate would mean that there would not be enough new loans created to pay off old loans (which is necessary, because there is always more debt in the economy than there is money, because money is created with interest attached, from the very beginning we are all indebted to a small cabal that sits behind the federal reserve). The defaulting of loans would lead to a chain reaction that would collapse the $700,000,000,000,000 derivatives market. In addition, the Fed wouldn’t be able to mindlessly pump money into the economy anymore such as with their current policy of quantitative easing.

    In 2001, Iraq began selling their oil in the Euro. We invaded.

    In 2010 Gaddafi proposed a new currency called the Gold Dinar to replace the dollar for oil sales. We bombed the shit out of his country and caused a regime change.

    Syria moved away from the Dollar in 06 and Iran in 08. That is what this is all about. There are other geopolitical objectives, sure, such as the pipeline that Syria signed with Iran instead of the US friendly Qatar, but the Petrodollar is the king. It is literally the only reason the dollar and US economy is stable. The entirety of the Western financial elite need the Petrodollar system and they are willing to go to war and kill millions to defend it.

    Some food for thought: how are they able to keep discussion about the petrodollar completely out of the mainstream media and politics? Hundreds, maybe thousands of people acting in concert to lie to the American people for another war. And they will do the same for Iran.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>