Something most curious is happening with the Wuhan lab-leaked plague in Israel. The more people get 3rd and 4th WuFlu jabs, the higher the number of WuFlu cases seems to be.
If I remember correctly, Israel did a deal with Pfizer early on in the pandemic such that Israel would get lots of the Pfizer Chinese plague jabs and in return Israel would provide Pfizer with lots of real world data on things like Covid infection rates. I also understand that Israel started jabbing before most other countries and Israel is the most jabbed country in the world. The population is 9.2 million. Of the 9.2 million 6,710,075 million people (probably most of the adult population) have had a least two vaccination shots, while 4,495,077 million have had three, and 813,632 have had four.
Here’s the latest chart of Covid-19 cases per million of the population for Israel:
(to see charts more clearly, left-click on the chart once, wait till a small version appears, then left-click again and you’ll have the chart in glorious widescreen technicolour)
As you’ll see, there was a massive spike in infections per million of the population at the start of 2022. I suppose this must have been when the Omicron variant spread.
To put the Israel Omicron spike into context, here are the infection per million of population rates for a few other developed countries:
Now, all these countries are pretty close in levels of Covid infections, though heavily-vaccinated Israel is second highest. But please note how much higher the Omicron spike in heavily-vaccinated Israel is compared to other developed countries – Israel is several times higher than most of the other countries.
Why did Israel have so many infections?
There are two main theories as to why the infection rates in heavily-vaccinated Israel spiked so much higher than in other countries:
Israel, with its small population, did more thorough testing than other countries and thus appeared to have higher infection rates
Or, of course, the large Israel spike may be due to a combination of the above.
However, the “fact checkers” at Reuters and the Big Tech companies have been busy claiming that multiple Covid jabba-jabs do NOT weaken the body’s immune system.
“COVID-19 vaccines do not weaken your immune system’s ability to respond to other infections so getting your jab will not make you more susceptible to colds or flu,” said Dr Doug Brown, chief executive of the British Society for Immunology. “After COVID-19 vaccination, your immune system is just as able to fight off infections by cold or flu viruses, and it will be better prepared to protect you against COVID-19.”
So the massive infections spike in Israel will forever remain a mystery.
Better than Mad Cows?
If I remember correctly at the time of the ‘Mad Cow’ disease outbreak in the UK, our rulers had a choice – either slaughter 6.5 million cattle or else vaccinate them. The choice was made to slaughter rather than vaccinate.
Perhaps we should consider ourselves lucky that with the Wuhan Mad Chinaman disease, our rulers decided we should be vaccinated rather than slaughtered? After all, the untested and largely ineffective vaccines will only kill a few people.
There’s good news and bad news this week for Aussie climate catastrophists.
First the bad news:
Bad news – Catastrophists’ predictions always wrong
Australia’s climate catastrophists, like climate catastrophists the world over, have a habit of making bloodcurdling predictions of imminent disaster that invariably turn out to have been total nonsense.
Here, for example, is the ‘Head of Climate Analysis’ at the Australian Bureau of Meteorology quoted in the Sydney Morning Herald in January 2008 predicting that droughts would be the new normal weather in Australia:
And here’s the UK Guardian newspaper a couple of years later reporting that the Australian floods of 2010 and 2011 were so severe that they caused the world’s sea levels to drop “by as much as 7mm”:
Not much evidence of eternal drought there
Good news – Dumb Aussies believe climate voodoo, not facts
The good news for Australian climate catastrophists is that so many Australian have been indoctrinated to believe the climate catastrophist nonsense that they refuse to accept what is actually happening. In spite of Aussie climate catastrophists, like climate catastrophists everywhere, always being hopelessly wrong with 30 to 40 years of doom-and-disaster predictions, Australians have just elected a Labour government whose number one priority is cutting Australia’s CO2 emissions to supposedly fight the supposed “climate emergency”.
At the moment, Australia is experiencing its coldest start to its winter for over 40 years and the country is expecting a record ski season. But the majority of the dumbo Bruces and Sheilas are convinced they’re all about to die in a global warming inferno caused by evil humans’ activities.
In Australia, as in many Western countries, people are so brainwashed by the climate catastrophist mainstream media and the Saint Greta brigade that they’re no longer capable of accepting facts when these facts contradict their beloved climate catastrophist propaganda. (Meanwhile, the rather more sensible Indians have recently reopened about 100 coal mines to power their growing economy):
When historians look back on the late 20th and early 21st centuries, perhaps they will call this period the “Age of Idiocy”?
Here’s the excellent Andrew Bolt from the excellent Sky News Australia trying to make sense of his compatriots’ stupidity:
I believe we may all have to learn a new word/expression. The new word/expression is a verb “to rwanda”. This can either be used in the form “to rwanda someone” or “to be rwandaed”.
The verb “to rwanda” should be used when a politician announces some great new policy which they believe will be popular with the public. But when you look at the small print, you find the politician is lying through their teeth as the policy will actually do the exact opposite of what the politician claims.
Is Priti Patel an honourable and trustworthy politician?
Here’s a link to the “Memorandum of Understanding” between the UK and Rwanda governments regarding the Provision of an Asylum Partnership Arrangement:
If you can be bothered to click on the link, you’ll see page after page of semi-legalistic verbiage about protecting the human rights of any illegal migrants transported from the UK to Rwanda. Here (in blue text) is just a tiny example:
2.1 The objective of this Arrangement is to create a mechanism for the relocation of asylum seekers whose claims are not being considered by the United Kingdom, to Rwanda, which will process their claims and settle or remove (as appropriate) individuals after their claim is decided, in accordance with Rwanda domestic law, the Refugee Convention, current international standards, including in accordance with international human rights law and including the assurances given under this Arrangement.
2.2 For the avoidance of doubt, the commitments set out in this Memorandum are made by the United Kingdom to Rwanda and vice versa and do not create or confer any right on any individual, nor shall compliance with this Arrangement be justiciable in any court of law by third-parties or individuals.
But what about Section 16?
Everything about this agreement looks fine till you come to Section 16.
Here (in red text) is Section 16.
16 Resettlement of vulnerable Refugees
16.1 The Participants will make arrangements for the United Kingdom to resettle a portion of Rwanda’s most vulnerable refugees in the United Kingdom, recognising both Participants’ commitment towards providing better international protection for refugees.
Section 16 is very short and contains none of the detailed explanation which you find in all the other sections of this Memorandum of Understanding. This is very odd.
But what can Section 16 mean? In it we learn that: The Participants will make arrangements for the United Kingdom to resettle a portion of Rwanda’s most vulnerable refugees in the United Kingdom
Ooops. You might have thought that Priti ‘Useless’ Patel’s great policy was all about sending illegal migrants to Rwanda. But Section 16 suggests that Rwanda will be sending a portion of its most vulnerable migrants to the UK.
We can find further indications of how we are being rwandaed by our charlatan government and Patel in the introduction to the Memorandum of Understanding where we learn: for many years, Rwanda has willingly been hosting and giving shelter to hundreds of thousands of refugees, offering adequate systems of refugee protection, consistent with the principles of international solidarity that underpin the international refugee protection system, and committed to the notion that cooperation and burden-sharing with respect to refugee status claimants can be enhanced.
And we also learn that Rwanda has been providing: life-saving protection, assistance and long-term solutions to extremely vulnerable refugees trapped in detention in Libya, through temporary evacuation to Rwanda.
Are you getting the picture now?
Our lying government has led us to believe that the Rwanda arrangement is all about sending Channel-crossing illegals from the UK to Rwanda. But it seems that actually there will be two-way traffic with loads of “vulnerable” migrants from Rwanda being sent to live at our expense in the UK.
I wonder why none of the mainstream media and nobody at the BBC or C4 News has noticed Section 16 of Patel’s Memorandum of Understanding?
It seems that nobody in our media thought it worth mentioning this possibly ‘inconvenient’ aspect of the great treaty with Rwanda.
As far as I can see, we’re being thoroughly rwandaed by our lying government, Patel and her minions.
Here’s the inimitable Simon Webb giving his interpretation of the great Section 16 mystery:
Regular readers will know that, in addition to trying to promote my own book about climate catastrophism – THERE IS NO CLIMATE CRISIS – I have several times recommended journalist Ross Clark’s satirical novel about climate lunacy – THE DENIAL:
In his novel, Ross Clark envisages a world in which every person has their own ‘carbon budget’. In this dystopia every purchase will have a carbon value and nobody is allowed to spend more than their ‘carbon budget’. So anyone eating meat or imported fruit or trying to take a foreign holiday will soon use up their carbon budget and be unable to buy any product or service which supposedly produces that ‘deadly’ greenhouse gas – CO2.
China shows the world how it’s done
That brings us to China. Here (in blue text) is a brief extract from Wikipedia’s piece on China’s social credit system:
According to the Chinese government’s 2015 Plan for Implementation, the Social Credit System was due to be fully implemented by 2020. Once implemented, the system will manage the rewards and punishments for businesses, institutions and individuals on the basis of their economic and personal behavior. Punishments for poor social credit include increased audits and government inspections for businesses, reduced employment prospects, travel bans, exclusion from private schools, slow internet connection, exclusion from high-prestige work, exclusion from hotels, and public shaming. Rewards for positive social credit include less frequent inspections and audits for businesses, fast-tracked approvals for government services, discounts on energy bills, being able to rent bikes and hotels without payment of a deposit, better interest rates at banks, and tax breaks.
As of June 2019, according to the National Development and Reform Commission of China, 27 million air tickets as well as 6 million high-speed rail tickets had been denied to people who were deemed “untrustworthy (失信)” (on a blacklist). Certain personal information of the blacklisted people is deliberately made accessible to the society and is displayed online as well as at various public venues such as movie theaters and buses while some cities have also banned children of “untrustworthy” residents from attending private schools and even universities. On the other hand, people with high credit ratings may receive rewards such as less waiting time at hospitals and governmental agencies, discounts at hotels, greater likelihood of receiving employment offers and so on.
Hopefully you get the picture of how technology-based social control works.
They’re developing the technology
I thought the company Alibaba was just the Chinese version of Amazon. But Alibaba seems to have greater ambitions. Below is a brief excerpt of a talk given by the president of Alibaba Group, a Chinese multinational technology company, at last week’s Davos World Economic Forum in which he bragged about developing technology which would monitor the “carbon footprint” of consumers.
“We’re developing through technology an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint,” Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans said at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Annual Summit in Davos, Switzerland. Evans described the technology as, “an individual carbon footprint tracker.”
They’re only trying to help us save the planet
Once this technology is developed, we’ll be told that it’s for our own benefit as it will help us each measure and thus reduce the damage we are each supposedly doing to the planet through what we eat, what we buy and how much we travel. But you don’t need much imagination to see how this technology can be turned into an instrument of control limiting how much we useless proles can buy or own or travel.
Within 10 to 20 years (or maybe sooner?) we’ll all have our very own ‘carbon budget card’. This will be loaded up with our carbon budget each year or each month and we will have to present the card every time we make a purchase. The carbon cost of that purchase will then be deducted from our carbon budget. Once you’ve used up that month’s carbon budget, no more food, travel or fun for you.
Of course, the ruling elites won’t have carbon budgets. Carbon budgets will just be for us worthless lumpenproletariat.
Someone much cleverer than I once said something like “George Orwell’s 1984 was meant to be a novel, not a user’s manual”. You could say the same for Ross Clark’s satirical novel – THE DENIAL
It’s odd how satirical novels about a dystopian future can so easily become reality.
Here’s the great man from Alibaba excitedly explaining the future he and his Davos chums are preparing for us:
My apologies for the bad language in this blog. But I just couldn’t find any other way of expressing what the globalist elites are doing to us all.
The W.H.O. defecates on us
First two pieces of great news from the World Health Organisation:
On 24 May 2022 (last week), the (IMHO) utterly corrupt, utterly corrupted, incompetent Ethiopian guy whose name I can’t be bothered to spell was re-elected as Director-General of the World Health Organisation for another five-year term. Tedros Whats-his-name was the guy who could have stopped the Wuhan lab-leaked plague in its tracks by admitting the plague could be passed from person to person and thus proposing an international travel ban. That was his job. Instead, he followed the orders of his Chinese boss claiming that the Chinese plague wasn’t infectious and that international travel should continue even as the Chinese were banning all travel within China. Then, of course, Tedros helped the Chinese cover up that the plague leaked from a filthy, badly-run lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
And while we’re on the subject of China and the World Health Organisation, on 28 May 2022, China was elected as one of the 12 members of the World Health Organisation’s Executive Board. China will join such paragons of medical excellence as Senegal, Morocco, Yemen, Moldova, the Maldives, Ethiopia and Micronesia in deciding the World Health Organisation’s strategy and activities. The only serious members of the World Health Organisation’s Executive Board are Canada and the USA. But they can always be outvoted by the worthless Third-World garbage countries most of whom are just glove puppets for the Chinese Communist Party
The United Nations defecate on us
This is not an April Fools joke. Or maybe it is a joke being played on us by the globalist elites. I guess our mainstream media were too busy celebrating the Queen’s platinum jubilee to have time and space to tell us that an important UN conference kicks off in Geneva this week – the UN Conference on Nuclear Disarmament. Chairing this important conference is that world leader in nuclear disarmament – North Korea.
You could never accuse me of being a pessimist as here’s some wonderful news from our (IMHO) increasingly unhinged police.
Seven police forces in England and Wales have decided to allow criminal suspects to be recorded on their computer systems as non-binary, meaning they consider themselves neither male nor female.
Two other forces, Norfolk and Suffolk constabularies, allow suspects to describe their gender as “unknown and unspecified” because officers are “aware there are a growing number of terms associated with gender and sexuality”.
A spokesman for both forces said that they recognise there are 67 different genders people can present as.
It’s lucky that there is so little crime that our police have time and energy to spend on such total nonsense.
It’s worse than you imagined
In my previous blog, I included a chart showing police conviction rates falling from 15.5% in 2014/15 to a pathetic 7.8% in 2018/19:
Since then I’ve managed to find a chart showing crime clearance rates from 1970 to 2021
(left-click on charts, then left-click again to see more clearly)
I hardly need to comment on this utter failure by our worthless police except to say that, if you’re a criminal, you’d have to be pretty stupid and useless at your criminality to be caught by our pointless police.
The police retreat?
Perhaps even more shocking than this collapse in crime clearance rates is the following chart. This shows that the number of police stations in England and Wales has plunged from 2,729 in 1970 to a miserable 600 by 2020:
It seems our politicians and police blether on about supposed ‘community policing’ while our police retreat from our communities to hide in ever fewer centralised police stations as far away as possible from the communities they are paid to police.
To cheer us up
A dog-owner’s neighbours apparently started complaining about the noise from his home. So he set up a camera to record what went on while he was out at work.
I wonder if the dog is reading the sheet music as the piece being played sounds a bit like something from American composer Philip Glass. Or maybe the dog is just improvising?
Hopefully, you’ll have been as excited as I was to learn about our police bosses’ latest brilliant plan – the Police Race Action Plan.
Our police proudly announced their great idea a few days ago:
The Police Race Action Plan has been developed jointly by the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) and the College of Policing with input from stakeholders, including the National Black Police Association, the Independent Scrutiny and Oversight Board Chair, and the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners.
It aims to address:
disparities affecting Black people
lower levels of trust and confidence in the police among some Black people
I suspect the Police Race Action Plan will cost us taxpayers millions of pounds and use up tens of thousands of policing hours.
Policing everything except crime?
As our police launch their latest navel-gazing, own-arsehole-admiring initiative, they seem to have abandoned the old-fashioned idea that the job of the police might be to prevent crime and then solve crime when it does happen.
Violent crime, especially knife crime, is rising each year:
(left-click on image, then left-click again to see more clearly)
Moreover, in the five years up to the start of Xi PingPong’s lab-leaked Wuhan Chinese plague, the UK police’s rate of solving crime fell from a pathetic 15.5% in 2014/15 to and even more unbelievably derisory 7.8% by 2018/9:
Though, of course, our police still have plenty of time and energy to display their commitment to those three modern gods – diversity, inclusion and equity:
To do TikTok videos of their dance skills:
And to kneel in subservience to BLM rioters and thugs:
Here’s (I believe) one of the main sponsors of the terrific Police Race Action Plan – Chief Constable Sir David Thompson:
Meanwhile, the police no longer bother responding to boring stuff like burglaries, sexual assaults, domestic violence, car thefts, drug-dealing, antisocial behaviour etc etc. Though if you call your neighbour a “fat idiot” or use the wrong pronoun for someone or suggest certain individuals might be more at home in some other country, the police will be on you like a ton of bricks.
It’s a pity the police didn’t name their new idea – “Constabulary Race Action Plan” – as the acronym would have better represented the value of this nonsense for ordinary taxpayers.
Khan’s blood-soaked streets of London
The city with the worst rise in crime, especially knife crime, is of course our vibrant, diverse, multicultural paradise – London.
Here’s a video I made three years ago warning what would happen if Londoners re-elected the (IMHO) useless, self-serving, incompetent Mayor Khan. Enjoy:
Is having Sky or Netflix essential to preserving life?
As our financially-incontinent chancellor splashes around money which we don’t have, I began to wonder how impoverished the supposedly ‘impoverished’ really are. The professional bleaters and moaners in the mainstream media (MSM) warn us of an ‘apocalypse’ from rising prices, in particular energy prices. We’re told that by the end of this year 40% of the UK’s 30 million or so homes (12 million homes) will be in ‘fuel poverty’. Apparently many of these 12 million homes in ‘fuel poverty’ will have to choose between heating or eating.
Sounds pretty grim, huh?
To highlight the great ‘cost of living crisis’, the MSM have had no trouble in finding loads of fat, ugly, sexually incontinent women (sorry I meant “angelic single mums”) with dyed pink hair, piercings and tattoos all claiming they were on the brink of starvation and financial ruin. So I wondered how I could test whether things were really as dire as the MSM professional bleaters and moaners claim. Then I came across this news item in a specialist online media magazine:
“According to UK audience measurement firm BARB, the number of UK households with a subscription to any SVOD service is now 18.8 million homes (66%), up from 17.4 million in Q3 2020.” (SVOD – Subscription Video On Demand)
The report went on to explain:
“Netflix is the market leader, subscribed to by 16.8 million homes. Amazon Prime Video is in second place with 12.5 million subscriptions, while Disney+ is subscribed to by 4.8 million households. Sky’s streaming business NOW is in 2.3 million British homes”.
These are just the homes with video streaming. So, as far as I understand, these figures don’t include the 8+ million homes with Sky TV subscriptions. Though I imagine there will be quite a lot of overlap between the 8+million Sky TV subscribers and the 18.8 million SVOD subscribers.
Furthermore, the report goes on to explain that many homes do what is called “subscription stacking”:
“Subscription stacking is also becoming increasingly normalised in the UK. The proportion of homes with an SVOD service that subscribe to two or more services has risen to 65.3%, up from 58.3% in Q3 2020”.
This means that more than 12 million homes have two or more video subscription services (65.3% of 18.8 million homes).
I accept that rising fuel and other prices may force many homes to end their TV subscriptions. But I also suspect that some of those claiming dire poverty have several widescreen TVs in their homes and at least one TV subscription.
I hadn’t realised that having a subscription to some TV/video service or other was now considered as essential to the preservation of human life as heating and eating.
You learn something new every day.
Are Zuckerberg and Clegg accessories to the Uvalde primary school massacre?
From what little I understand, the guy who carried out the Uvalde primary school massacre announced his murderous rampage on Facebook prior to the shootings. I believe the shooter made three Facebook posts – one in which he announced he was going to kill his grandmother, a second in which he announced he had shot his grandmother and then a third about half an hour before the primary school attack in which the shooter announced he was going to attack a local primary school:
Facebook has loads of complicated algorithms and thousands of supposed ‘fact-checkers’ which mean than any posts questioning the official progressive, woke, libtard narrative on any issue get flagged and deleted. For example, if you dared suggest that the WuFlu leaked from a Chinese Wuhan lab or cast doubt on the effectiveness and safety of the miracle Pfizer mRNA vaccines or claim that catastrophic man-made climate change was a load of nonsense, you’d find that your Facebook posts rapidly disappeared and even that you were banned.
But apparently posting that you’re going to shoot your grandmother, that you’ve just shot your grandmother and that you’re about to massacre a load of primary-school kids is considered quite acceptable by Mr Zuckerberg and his sidekick, Nick Clegg.
I wonder if Facebook’s inaction in reporting the shooter to the police could in some way make the company accessories to the massacre? I hope the bereaved parents sue Facebook, Zuckerberg and Clegg. That would cause a bit of consternation for the woke social media mega-corporations who are trying to control our lives.
(Heavy Germanic accent) Vee have vays to make you obey! Vee kontroll ze future!
And on the subject of people trying to control our lives, can you spot the difference between these two famous, much-admired German orators?
First, here’s self-appointed ruler of the universe, Klaus Schwab, opening the latest World Economic Forum meeting for the ruling elites at Davos:
The NHS – our great national religion – apparently has so much money and so much time on its hands that it is opening a special clinic to offer free female-to-male surgery for anyone who wants it. I won’t go into detail about what this surgery involves. But clearly NHS bosses have too much money and seem completely unaware of the massive waiting lists for real (not narcissistic lifestyle) medical treatments.
In 2021, over 1,659,000 illegal migrants crossed the US/Mexico border. Actually, the 1,659,000 are ‘apprehensions’ – illegal migrants the authorities are aware of:
(left-click on chart, then left-click again to see more clearly)
That’s over 4,500 new arrivals in the US every single day.
Moreover, we’ve no idea how many thousands or hundreds of thousands more illegal migrants crossed into the US managing to avoid US border control.
But what does Biden care? This mass of humanity flooding into the US represents another 1,659,000 Democrat voters. I guess the Democrats would rather turn the US into another Venezuela than allow the Republicans to ever win another election.
The UK’s great replacement
There were 28,526 people detected arriving on small boats into the UK in 2021. This compares with 8,466 in 2020, 1,843 in 2019 and 299 in 2018. You don’t have to be a mathematical genius to spot a trend here.
A certain B. Greening issued a Freedom of Information request to the ludicrously misnamed “Immigration Enforcement” asking how many of those arriving between January 2018 and June 2021 had passports:
The answer was just 317. During this period, about 16,500 illegal migrants crossed the Channel. This means that 98% of these migrants mysteriously managed to cross several countries with passports and then sadly ‘lost’ their passports just before Priti Patel’s Border Farce luxury ferry service picked them up to bring them to Britain.
I’m feeling a bit under the weather today, so I’ll let Simon Webb of History Debunked explain how we’re being taken for fools by our UK-hating rulers:
Every debunked, over-simplified, pseudo-scientific, quasi-scientific, unsubstantiated, politically motivated myth, excuse and outright falsehood rolled into one easy (very, very easy) read. Useful to know how the tiny minority who make up the other side think (or, in fact, don’t)
I guess this reader wasn’t impressed!
You WILL take the vaccines!!!!
Here’s a nice photo of our favourite Big-Pharma boss – Pfizer CEO Eric Bourla. Eric is pictured with his great chum – EU big boss, Ursula Fond of Lying:
Ursula, as you’ll well know, has helped make Pfizer and her friend Eric Bourla rich beyond most people’s wildest dreams. Ursula has squandered tens of billions of EU taxpayers’ money on Eric’s supposed vaccines which, we now know, are only partially effective for a few months and which have killed hundreds of formerly healthy people.
Hopefully you all remember how we were coerced into taking these ineffective and sometimes deadly fake vaccines by mandates forbidding the unvaccinated from travel, entertainment and many other activities. And in some sectors, anyone refusing these ineffective and unsafe supposed ‘vaccines’ even lost their jobs. Care workers in the UK, for example, were fired if they refused vaccination. Tens of thousands did lose their jobs causing a staffing crisis in the care sector. And then, when care homes could no longer accept more patients, many elderly got stuck in hospitals becoming ‘bed-blockers’ thus worsening the crisis in the NHS and leading to ever-increasing waiting lists for hospital beds and operations.
All this shows that our rulers have found out how to force most of us to comply by taking whatever dubious vaccines they want to foist on us. But they can’t force us to take their medicines, can they?
You WILL take the medicine!!!
Even the conspiracy fanatics couldn’t have made this one up.
Here’s our friend Eric Bourla of Pfizer again. This time he’s taking part in a discussion at a World Economic Forum meeting (probably in Davos?). Eric is explaining that Pfizer have now developed the technology which allows a micro-transmitter to be put in a pill. So, when the pill is ingested, a signal will go to the authorities telling them that you have taken the required medicine.
Here’s a very short (slightly over-dramatised?) video featuring our favourite pharmacist extolling this great medical advance:
Even George Orwell couldn’t have imagined this level of Big-Brother government control.
W.H.O. rules the world?
A few blogs ago, I warned about a meeting of the World Health Assembly (I didn’t even know such an organisation existed, did you?) this week which will hand power to control any new ‘health emergencies’ to the World Health Organisation (W.H.O.). This will give the unelected, incompetent, China-controlled W.H.O. the authority to instruct national governments how to handle the next ‘health emergency’. A ‘health emergency’ will include pandemics. But using ‘scope creep’ the W.H.O. bureaucrats might (will definitely?) also widen the concept of a ‘health emergency’ to include such supposed ‘health emergencies’ like obesity, food availability, migration or, of course, catastrophic man-made climate change.
I haven’t seen this meeting reported anywhere in the mainstream media (apart from GB News). I wonder why not?
Here’s the magnificent Neil Oliver reacting to this latest power grab by the unelected globalist elites:
David Craig, on June 11th, 2022
